PHYSICS 304 QUANTUM PHYSICS II (2005) Assignment 1 Solutions

Similar documents
Assignment 2 Solutions. 1. The general state of a spin half particle with spin component S n = S ˆn = 1 2 can be shown to be given by

Homework assignment 3: due Thursday, 10/26/2017

PH425 Spins Homework 5 Due 4 pm. particles is prepared in the state: + + i 3 13

Physics 113!!!!! Spring 2009!! Quantum Theory Seminar #5

Quantum Information: Homework 2

PH 425 Quantum Measurement and Spin Winter SPINS Lab 2

Vector Spaces in Quantum Mechanics

Review of the Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

The experiment consists of studying the deflection of a beam of neutral ground state paramagnetic atoms (silver) in inhomogeneous magnetic field:

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 6 Solutions 3/23/05

Vector Spaces in Quantum Mechanics

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2013 Assignment 3

The Stern-Gerlach experiment and spin

Lecture 9. Angular momentum - 2

Solutions to chapter 4 problems

4 A Measurement is a Projection or a dot product (or inner product)!!

Angular momentum and spin

Sample Problems on Quantum Dynamics for PHYS301

1 Polarization of Light

1 Algebra of State Vectors

16.1. PROBLEM SET I 197

Graduate Quantum Mechanics I: Prelims and Solutions (Fall 2015)

Final Exam Tuesday, May 8, 2012 Starting at 8:30 a.m., Hoyt Hall Duration: 2h 30m

Lecture 18: 3D Review, Examples

The Bloch Sphere. Ian Glendinning. February 16, QIA Meeting, TechGate 1 Ian Glendinning / February 16, 2005

How the Result of a Measurement of a Component of the Spin of a Spin- 1 2 Particle Can Turn Out to be 100

Physics 221A Fall 2010 Notes 3 The Density Operator

Singlet State Correlations

The Spin (continued). February 8, 2012

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 12 Orbital Angular Momentum and Spherical Harmonics

One-electron Atom. (in spherical coordinates), where Y lm. are spherical harmonics, we arrive at the following Schrödinger equation:

Lecture 4 (Sep. 18, 2017)

Lecture3 (and part of lecture 4).

1 1D Schrödinger equation: Particle in an infinite box

Physics Capstone. Karsten Gimre May 19, 2009

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 21 Nov 2003

PHYSICS 250 May 4, Final Exam - Solutions

{0,1} = B versus a 0 +b 1 C 2

ADIABATIC PHASES IN QUANTUM MECHANICS

The quantum state as a vector

PHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Final Exam SOLUTIONS December 17, 2004, 7:30 a.m.- 9:30 a.m.

10 Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

INTRODUCTORY NOTES ON QUANTUM COMPUTATION

Chm 331 Fall 2015, Exercise Set 4 NMR Review Problems

Quantum Field Theory. Chapter Introduction. 8.2 The Many Particle State

Spin Dynamics Basic Theory Operators. Richard Green SBD Research Group Department of Chemistry

THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY FACULTY OF SCIENCE INTERMEDIATE PHYSICS PHYS 2912 PHYSICS 2B (ADVANCED) ALL QUESTIONS HAVE THE VALUE SHOWN

Lecture If two operators A, B commute then they have same set of eigenkets.

129 Lecture Notes More on Dirac Equation

Legendre Polynomials and Angular Momentum

The Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1

Prob (solution by Michael Fisher) 1

Notes on excitation of an atom or molecule by an electromagnetic wave field. F. Lanni / 11feb'12 / rev9sept'14

1 1D Schrödinger equation: Particle in an infinite box

The curious properties of spin

Atkins & de Paula: Atkins Physical Chemistry 9e Checklist of key ideas. Chapter 8: Quantum Theory: Techniques and Applications

Lecture 11 Spin, orbital, and total angular momentum Mechanics. 1 Very brief background. 2 General properties of angular momentum operators

Figure 1: Grad, Div, Curl, Laplacian in Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical coordinates. Here ψ is a scalar function and A is a vector field.

Quantization of the Spins

STERN-GERLACH EXPERIMENTS

PHYS 508 (2015-1) Final Exam January 27, Wednesday.

Columbia University Department of Physics QUALIFYING EXAMINATION

The Convex Hull of Spin Coherent States

PHY413 Quantum Mechanics B Duration: 2 hours 30 minutes

A Simple Model of Quantum Trajectories. Todd A. Brun University of Southern California

Lecture 13B: Supplementary Notes on Advanced Topics. 1 Inner Products and Outer Products for Single Particle States

Angular momentum. Quantum mechanics. Orbital angular momentum

Quantum Mechanics is Linear Algebra. Noah Graham Middlebury College February 25, 2014

arxiv: v1 [physics.ed-ph] 5 Dec 2013

More On Carbon Monoxide

ONE AND MANY ELECTRON ATOMS Chapter 15

Rotation Matrices. Chapter 21

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 13 Spins in Magnetic Fields

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

Problem 1: Step Potential (10 points)

Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen

G : Quantum Mechanics II

General Exam Part II, Fall 1998 Quantum Mechanics Solutions

The Framework of Quantum Mechanics

2 Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Common operators in QM: Potential Energy. Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case: 3-D case

Physics 221A Fall 2018 Notes 3 The Density Operator

1 Recall what is Spin

Does Quantum Measurement Violate the Conservation of Angular Momentum? A Paradox Resolved Rick Bradford, 6/12/16

Testing Heisenberg s Uncertainty Principle with Polarized Single Photons

Classical Mechanics Comprehensive Exam

Coherent states, beam splitters and photons

Lecture 10. Central potential

Postulates of Quantum Mechanics

Collection of formulae Quantum mechanics. Basic Formulas Division of Material Science Hans Weber. Operators

So far we have limited the discussion to state spaces of finite dimensions, but it turns out that, in

Fun With Carbon Monoxide. p. 1/2

20 The Hydrogen Atom. Ze2 r R (20.1) H( r, R) = h2 2m 2 r h2 2M 2 R

Tight-Binding Model of Electronic Structures

Right sign of spin rotation operator

Time dependent perturbation theory 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 11 May 2012

Introduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann

d 1 µ 2 Θ = 0. (4.1) consider first the case of m = 0 where there is no azimuthal dependence on the angle φ.

Lab #13: Polarization

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics

Transcription:

PHYSICS 04 QUANTUM PHYSICS II 200 Assignment Solutions. The general state of a spin half particle with spin component S n = S n = be shown to be given by 2 h can S n = 2 h = cos 2 θ S z = 2 h + eiφ sin 2 θ S z = 2 h where n is a unit vector n = sin θ cos φ î + sin θ sin φ ĵ + cos θ k, with θ and φ the usual angles for spherical polar coordinates. a Determine the expression for the states S x = 2 h and S y = 2 h. b Suppose that a measurement of S z is carried out on a particle in the state S n = 2 h. What is the probability that the measurement yields each of ± 2 h? c Determine the expression for the state for which S n = 2 h. d Calculate the inner products S n = 2 h S n = 2 h, S n = 2 h S n = 2 h and S n = 2 h S n = 2 h. a For the state S x = 2 h, the unit vector n must be pointing in the direction of the X axis, i.e. θ = π/2, φ = 0, so that S x = 2 h = 2 Sz = 2 h + S z = 2 h For the state S y = 2 h, the unit vector n must be pointed in the direction of the Y axis, i.e. θ = π/2 and φ = π/2. Thus S y = 2 h = 2 Sz = 2 h + i S z = 2 h b The probabilities will be given by S z = ± 2 h S n = 2 h 2. These probabilities will be S z = 2 h S n = 2 h 2 = cos 2 2 θ S z = 2 h S n = 2 h 2 = e iφ sin 2 θ 2 = sin 2 2 θ. c The state for which S n = 2 h is the state for which S n = 2 h, i.e. S n = 2 h. Thus the required result can be obtained by making the replacement n n, which is achieved through the replacements θ π θ and φ φ + π. Thus, the required expression is S n = 2 h = cos 2 π θ S z = 2 h + eiφ+π sin 2 π θ S z = 2 h = sin 2 θ S z = 2 h eiφ cos 2 θ S z = 2 h

d The required inner products are, using the orthonormality of the basis states S z = ± 2 h : S n = 2 h S n = 2 h = sin 2 θ S z = 2 h e iφ cos 2 θ S z = 2 h cos 2 θ S z = 2 h + eiφ sin 2 θ S z = 2 h = sin 2 θ cos 2 θ cos 2 θ sin 2 θ = 0 S n = 2 h S n = 2 h = cos 2 θ S z = 2 h + e iφ sin 2 θ S z = 2 h cos 2 θ S z = 2 h + eiφ sin 2 θ S z = 2 h = cos 2 2 θ + sin2 2θ =. S n = 2 h S n = 2 h = sin 2 θ S z = 2 h e iφ cos 2 θ S z = 2 h sin 2 θ S z = 2 h eiφ cos 2 θ S z = 2 h = sin 2 2 θ + cos2 2θ =. 2

2. A beam of spin half particles is sent through a series of three Stern-Gerlach devices, as illustrated in the figure below. The first device transmits particles with S z = 2 h and filters out particles with S z = 2 h i.e. this beam is blocked. In the second device, the magnetic field is oriented in the direction n, which lies in the XZ plane and makes an angle θ with the Z axis. This device transmits particles with S n = S n = 2 h and filters out particles with S n = 2 h. A last device transmits particles with S z = 2 h and filters out particles with S z = 2 h. Oven Z S n = 2 h S z = 2 h Z S z = n 2 h a What fraction of the particles transmitted through the first Stern-Gerlach device will survive the third measurement? You will need the probability of transmission through the second Stern-Gerlach apparatus set at an angle θ obtained in Question. b How must the angle θ of the second device be oriented so as to maximize the number of particles that are transmitted by the final device? What fraction of the particles survive the third measurement for this value of θ? c What fraction of the particles survive the last measurement if the second Stern- Gerlach device is simply removed from the experiment? a As the relative angle of orientation of the two magnetic fields between the first and second Stern-Gerlach devices is θ, the probability of an atom emerging from the second device with S n = 2 h will be cos2 2θ. The relative angle of the magnetic fields between the second and the third devices is θ so that the probability of an atom emerging from the second device with S z = 2 h is cos 2 2 θ = cos2 2 θ and the probability of emerging with S z = 2 h is cos 2 2 π θ = sin2 2θ. Consequently the probability of an atom emerging in the final S z = 2 h beam is cos2 2 θ sin2 2 θ = 4 sin2 θ. b The maximum value that sin 2 θ can have is unity. This will occur when θ = π/2, i.e. when the second device has its magnetic field oriented in the x direction. The maximum fraction of atoms that will make it through the series of Stern- Gerlach devices is 4. Half will be lost in passing through the second device, and of those that make it through, another half will be lost when passing through the final device. c If the intervening device is simply removed, then no atoms will emerge from the last device in the S z = 2 h beam as all atoms entering the device will have S z = 2 h.

. A neutral molecule consisting of identical atoms sitting at the vertices A, B, C of an equilateral triangle is ionized by the addition of an electron which can be attached to any one of the three atoms. Let the state of the system in which the electron is attached to atom A be A etc. a Show that the states are orthonormal. = A + e 2iπ/ B + e 2iπ/ C 2 = A + B + C b What is the third state required to make these states a complete orthonormal set of basis states? a First check that the states are normalized: = + e 2iπ/ 2 + e 2iπ/ + e 2iπ/ 2 + e 2iπ/ = + + = 2 2 = + 2 + + 2 + = + + =. Now for orthogonality: 2 = + e 2iπ/ 2 + e 2iπ/ + 2 + = + e 2iπ/ + e 2iπ/ + 2 cos2π/ = = 0 since cos2π/ = 2. b Suppose we let the third state be given by = a A + b b + c C. We then have, by the orthogonality of with amd 2 : = a + e 2iπ/ b + e 2iπ/ c = 0 2 = a + b + c = 0. 2 Eliminating a from this pair of equations gives which can be written e 2iπ/ b + e 2iπ/ c = 0 e iπ/ e iπ/ e iπ/ b + e iπ/ e iπ/ e iπ/ c = 0 4

Cancelling the common factor then gives or e iπ/ b e iπ/ c = 0 b = e 2iπ/ c. If we now multiply Eq. by exp2iπ/ and use the fact that exp4iπ/ = exp 2iπ/ we get e 2iπ/ a + e 2iπ/ b + c = 0 which becomes, on reordering the terms c + e 2iπ/ a + e 2iπ/ b = 0 c + b + a = 0 which is of the same form as the original pair of equations with b a, a c and c b so that the solution will be Combining Eq. and Eq. 4 then gives Thus, overall, we can write a = e 2iπ/ b. 4 b = e 2iπ/ a and c = e 2iπ/ a = a A + e 2iπ/ B + e 2iπ/ a C Checking the normalization to determine a then shows that the final normalized state is = A + e 2iπ/ B + e 2iπ/ C. 4. A cavity which supports a single mode of oscillation of the electromagnetic field can have states in which there are n = 0,, 2,... photons present, from which we can construct the basis vectors { n ; n = 0,, 2,... }. For the following two states, ψ = n= n n and φ = n= n n determine whether or not the states are normalizable, and if so, write down the expression for the normalized state. Which of the states represents a possible physical state of the system? The inner product ψ ψ is given by ψ ψ = which is a divergent series, and hence the state vector ψ cannot be normalized to unity. No probability interpretation can be applied in this case, and hence this vector does not represent a possible physical state of the system. n= n

The inner product φ φ in contrast is φ φ = which is a convergent series it converges to π 2 /6 so the state vector φ can be normalized to unity: φ = 6 π φ, and hence can represent a physical state of the system. n= n 2. With respect to a pair of orthonormal vectors and 2 that span the state space H of a certain system, the Hermitean operator ˆQ is defined by its action on these base states as follows: ˆQ = 2 2i 2 ˆQ 2 = 2i 2. a What is the matrix represention of ˆQ in the {, 2 } basis? b Show that the states q = + 2i 2 q 2 = 2 i 2. are eigenstates of ˆQ and determine the associated eigenvalues. c The operator ˆQ above represents a certain physical observable Q of a quantum system which is prepared in the state ψ = + + i 2. i What are the possible results of a measurement of the observable Q? ii What are the probabilities of obtaining each of the possible results? iii What is the state of the system after the measurement is performed for each of the possible measurement outcomes? a The required matrix is ˆQ =. 2 2i 2i b Letting ˆQ act on q gives ˆQ q = ˆQ + 2i 2 = ˆQ + 2i ˆQ 2 = 2 2i 2 4 2i 2 = 2 4i 2 = 2 q. 6

Thus, q is an eigenstate of ˆQ with eigenvalue 2. Similarly, letting ˆQ act on q 2 gives ˆQ q 2 = ˆQ 2 i 2 = 2 ˆQ i ˆQ 2 = 4 4i 2 + 2 + i 2 = 6 i 2 = q 2. Thus, q 2 is an eigenstate of ˆQ with eigenvalue. c i The possible results are the eigenva;ues of ˆQ, that is -2 or. ii the probability of obtaining the result 2 will be q ψ 2 and this is given by q ψ 2 = q + + i q 2 2 = 2i + i 2 = 2i + 2 2 =. Here we have made use of the expression for q in terms of the states and 2 to calculate the inner products q and q 2. The probability of obtaining the other result can be calculated in the same manner as above, or by simply subtracting this first result from unity. We will follow the longer route as a check on the calculations. Thus we require q 2 ψ 2 which is given by q 2 ψ 2 = q 2 + + i q 2 2 2 = 2 + i + i 2 = 2 + i 2 = 2. iii If the result q = 2 is obtained, then the state of the system immediately after the measurement is performed is q, and if the result q 2 = is obtained, then the state of the system immediately after the measurement is performed is q 2. 7