Utilization of Extractable Soil Test Sulfate as an Indicator for Acid Producing Pyritic Sulfur

Similar documents
Soil Fertility. Fundamentals of Nutrient Management June 1, Patricia Steinhilber

ph and Liming Practices Kent Martin Stafford County 1/5/2010

Acid Soil. Soil Acidity and ph

Mehlich and Modified Mehlich Buffer for Lime Requirement

CLASS EXERCISE 5.1 List processes occurring in soils that cause changes in the levels of ions.

Be sure to show all calculations so that you can receive partial credit for your work!

AGRONOMIC POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF USING PRECIPITATED CALCIUM CARBONATE IN THE HIGH PLAINS

AN APPLICATION OF ACID BASE ACCOUNTING FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION IN EAST TENNESSEE 1

REMEDIATION OF THE MILLTOWN DAM SEDIMENTS IN MONTANA

Only healthy soil can grow a nutrient dense food. You are what you eat!

Pyrite in acid sulfate soils: transformation and inhibition of its oxidation by application of natural materials

Agricultural Fertilizer Applicator Soil Test Results What the heck do they mean?

Gain a better understanding of soil ph and how it is measured. Understand how lime requirement is determined.

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

EVALUATION OF NUTRIENT EXTRACTION ABILITY OF COMMONLY EMPLOYED PROCEDURES IN NUTRIENT SORPTION STUDIES

Adsorption of ions Ion exchange CEC& AEC Factors influencing ion

Alleviating Soil Acidity through Organic Matter Management. Malcolm E. Sumner, University of Georgia Marcos A Pavan IAPAR

Characterization and comparison of mine wastes from legacy mines in NM

BUFFERING MECHANISM AND SENSITIVITY TO ACID DEPOSITION OF SOILS OF AKWA IBOM STATE, NIGERIA

Supplementary Material: Crop & Pasture Science, 2013, 64(12),

Soil changes during stockpiling and after reclamation at three Wyoming natural gas production areas

Saline and Sodic Soils: Characteristics and Properties

Rocks and Weathering

Soil ph: Review of Concepts

Overview. Rock weathering Functions of soil Soil forming factors Soil properties

FOR Soil Quality Report 2017

A Global Assessment of Precipitation Chemistry and Deposition

Eighth Work Plan, Pond Dynamics Research 1 (PDR1)

MAIZE PRODUCTION AND CATION CONTENT IN BIOMASS DEPENDING ON SOIL ACIDITY NEUTRALIZATION AND MINERAL NUTRITION

Appendix 2b. NRCS Soil Survey

Chapter 6. Weathering, Erosion, and Soil

An assessment of the risk of aerial transport of rust pathogens to the Western Hemisphere and within North America

Quantifying the Value of Precise Soil Mapping

Priority Pollutants in Untreated and Treated Discharges from Coal Mines

for GREENHOUSES GREENHOUSE Why are Mycorrhizae Important? Benefit to Plants

LESSONS LEARNED FROM MINING-INFLUENCED WATERS STUDIES AT THE NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES

Rhizosphere Effects of Carboniferous and Clayey Compounds in Sandy Soil Matrices

KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report LAND SUBSIDENCE KIOWA COUNTY, KANSAS. May 2, 2007

USDA FOREST SERVICE RESEARCH NOTE NE-198

Introduction to Soil Science and Wetlands Kids at Wilderness Camp

soil assessment and management planning for CSG projects

Minerals and Rocks. Environmental Learning Community CORC 1332 Sept 21, 2010

HYDRIC SOILS. Background

Effect of integrated nutrient management practices on acidity and nutrient availability in acid soil

2010 Crop Year Fertilizer Report

Landscapes & Hydric Soils Bruce Vasilas University of Delaware

STUDENT SOIL PRESENTATIONS

Studying Rocks and Soil

Volume Composition of a Desirable Surface Soil

2012 Crop Year Fertilizer Report

Soil Formation. Lesson Plan: NRES B2-4

UNITED STATES AND SOUTH AMERICA OUTLOOK (FULL REPORT) Wednesday, April 18, 2018

Classification according to patent rock material/origin, soil distribution and orders

Properties and Management of Soil Damaged by the 2011 Huge Tsunami in Eastern Japan

Impact of Gypsum and Sulfuric Acid Application on Cotton Yield under Saline Sodic Soil Condition in Melka Sadi Irrigated Farm

Boron sorption in soils and its extractability by soil tests (Mehlich 3, ammonium acetate and water extraction)

2.2 Acid mine drainage

2012/2013 Powell River Project Annual Report Predicting TDS Release from SW Virginia Soil-Overburden Sequences

Soils. Source: Schroeder and Blum, 1992

EFFECTIVENESS OF SCREENED AG-LIME A REVIEW

WEATHERING ACCORDING TO THE CATIONIC BONDING ENERGIES OF COLLOIDS I ABSTRACT

Soil - the battery of your business

April 9, Phosphate Mining and Reclamation Overview

Nutrient status of potatoes grown on compost amended soils as determined by sap nitrate levels.

Project Annual Report :

Weathering is the process that breaks down rock and other substances at Earth s surface

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2015, 7(9S): Research Article

Simplified Analysis for Soil Samples with Compact Water Quality Meter <LAQUAtwin>

SUMMARY OF ASL TEST METHODS

Weathering, Soil, and Mass Movements

3.3 CLIMATE, GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS CLIMATE GEOLOGY TOPOGRAPHY

Lecture 16: Soil Acidity; Introduction to Soil Ecology

AZUCAR MINERALS COMMENCES DRILLING AT THE EL COBRE PROJECT, MEXICO

Chapter 6 9/25/2012. Weathering, Erosion and Soils. Introduction. How Are Earth Materials Altered? Introduction. How Are Earth Materials Altered?

MINERALOGY AND CHEMISTRY OF MINE WASTE ROCK PILES IN MINING DISTRICTS IN SOUTHERN COLORADO AND NEW MEXICO

Lab 8 Dynamic Soil Systems I: Soil ph and Liming

APPLICATION OF NEAR INFRARED REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY (NIRS) FOR MACRONUTRIENTS ANALYSIS IN ALFALFA. (Medicago sativa L.) A. Morón and D. Cozzolino.

Soil Chemistry. Dr. Shalamar Armstrong Dr. Rob Rhykerd Department of Agriculture

Sea Level Rise in Connecticut A Risk-Informed Approach

The future of the Lowland Belizean Savannas?.

RED OAK SEEDLING RESPONSE TO DIFFERENT TOPSOIL SUBSTITUTES AFTER FIVE YEARS 1

Practice Questions for Lecture 5 Geology 1200

Chapter 2. Regional Landscapes and the Hydrologic Cycle

Earth Science, 10e. Edward J. Tarbuck & Frederick K. Lutgens

Acid sulfate soils in Finland Anton Boman

Unit E: Basic Principles of Soil Science. Lesson 2: Understanding Soil Formation

What are Metal Leaching and Acid Rock Drainage and Why are They Important to Mining?

FRACTIONATION OF METALS IN SEDIMENTS AFFECTED BY MINING WASTES IN THE TRI-STATE MINING DISTRICT

Sulfidic materials in dryland river wetlands

Arsenic and Other Trace Elements in Groundwater in the Southern San Joaquin Valley of California

Correction to Spatial and temporal distributions of U.S. winds and wind power at 80 m derived from measurements

Treatment of Salt Affected Soil in the Oil Field

(4) Give an example of important reactions that are responsible for the composition of river water.

GEOL Lab #11 Information (Guidelines for Student Soil Presentations on April 8)

Weathering and Soil Formation. Chapter 10

Boron Desorption Kinetic in Calcareous Soils

ABSTRACT I. INTRODUCTION

Theoretical settling time for suspended sediment in flooded rice fields

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ANALYSIS

Preliminary soil survey of the NATL Old Field Plots

Transcription:

Utilization of Extractable Soil Test Sulfate as an Indicator for Acid Producing Pyritic Sulfur David J. Lang and K. Keith Crouse Mississippi State University

Thionic Fluvisols (acid sulfate soils) Worldwide about 24 Mi. ha (~ 0.2 %) are found, mostly in SE Asia; often influenced by tide. Thionic Fluvisols are found in the coastal lowlands of: a. SE Asien (Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand) b. W-Africa: Senegal, Gambia, Sierra Leone c. NE-coast of S-America (Venezuela, Guyana)

Grey reduced sulfidic materials are commonly encountered during active construction in the Fredericksburg/Stafford area of Virginia. These materials will usually acidify over time to ph less than 3.5 unless large amounts of lime are added and incorporated. http://www.landrehab.org/acid_sulfate_soils Dr. Lee Daniels

Victoria Australia Road Guidelines

ph and Total Sulfur (S) are Initial Assessments Stage A: Preliminary Hazard Assessment A ph of in situ soil or oxidised soil less than 5 indicates the presence of ASS. ph < 5 Stage B: Detailed Soil Site Assessment %S (% sulfur) if less than 0.03 %S, ASS are not present and the proposed road construction activities can proceed without restriction. Pyritic Sulfur Fe2 S = 53.45 % Sulfur 0.03 %S = 0.0561% Pyrite If the net acidity is 0.03 %S or greater, ASS are present. (0.0561 % Pyrite) Sulfur (S) and Acid Base Accounting Procedures are $$$$ https://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/searchresultpage?q=acid%20sulfate%20soil

TEXAS HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES SO 4 -S = 35.5 %S Multiply x 0.355 = % S Recommended Practice for Stabilization of Sulfate-Rich Subgrade Soils Texas _ National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) National Academy Press http://nap.edu/22997 DOI 10.17226/22997

METHODS FOR SULFATE QUANTIFICATION IN SOILS These methodologies use different sulfate measurement techniques Chromatography, Gravimetric (Turbidity) Colorimetry ICP Most of the test methods are based on determining water soluble sulfates in the soil. Commonly Used Soil Test Extractants

Soil Test Extraction Reagents Reagents containing Sulfates cannot be utilized Mehlich-1 extracting solution: 0.0125 M H 2 SO 4. Newer Mehlich s (2 and 3) are OK In the Northeast USA: Extraction for Sulfate-S (Morgan s / Modified Morgan s) OK North Central USA Soil Extractants: Bray, Olsen, Mehlich OK South and Southeast Mehlich developed in North Carolina Lancaster Method Developed in Mississippi Lancaster Reagents OK

Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-AES) Sulfur is determined by the Intensity of the Sulfate and Sulfide Emission at 180.7 nm Colon at al, 2008. Sulfide and Sulfate Determination.. by ICP.. J. Anal. Atomic Spec 23:416-418

Lignite Coal Mine, Choctaw County, MS

R H M S E L M A https://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/0283/report.pdf Crider 1906 Geology of Mississippi

Introduction Overburdens in the Mississippi Embayment are mined for lignite in Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas. Similar Eocene deposits are mined for lignite in Wyoming, Montana and North Dakota. There are unconsolidated sediment layers that are unoxidized gray materials and may be suitable inclusion as final respreads (NOT APPROVED!). Variable amounts of pyritic sulfur may be present in these overburdens selected for reclamation that can be difficult to predict from visual characterizations. Generally, red oxidized materials contain little pyritic S, so these are favored as suitable topsoil substitutes (RedOX Approved as Respread)

Introduction Standard agricultural soil testing determines exchangeable potassium (K) and phosphorus and extractable potassium (K), but neither ph nor the predicted lime requirement provides an indication of potentially oxidizable sulfur. Normal agricultural soils contain 50 to 200 mg kg -1 extractable sulfate depending upon seasonal sulfur mineralization stages and it can vary by extraction method utilized (Bray, Mehlich, Lancaster, etc).

Sulfur Cycle is Very Complex and Dynamic

Sulfur Emissions Success! https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/books/abstracts/agronomymonogra/sulfuramissingl/25

Muck Soil (Histosol) in Florida Releases NO 3-, NH 4 + and SO 4 - even without Sulfur or N Added SO 4 - and NO 3 - at 200 to 400+ mg kg -1 Seasonal Mineralization Changes SEASONAL CHANGES IN NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY FOR SULFUR-AMENDED EVERGLADES SOILS UNDER SUGARCANE Ye, Wright,and McCray. 2011 Journal of Plant Nutrition, 34:2095 2113. DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2011.618571

Lime Requirement of Agricultural Soils Not Applicable for Reclaimed Mine Land with some Pyritic Sulfur

Experiments in Mississippi with Reclaimed Lignite Lands Early work with Red Gray Mixtures Greenhouse Incubation USDA Manure and Gypsum

Objectives Determine Potential Adverse Effects of Utilizing Gray Unoxidized Deep Subsoil as a Plant Growth Medium Determine the Optimum Ratio of Gray to Red Soil as Suitable Plant Growth Substitute Material Utilize Common Soil Test Extractable Sulfate as an Early Indication of Pyritic Sulfur FeS 2

Site B was a Sweatman Silt Loam Soil Low Pyritic Sulfur 0.05% Light colored gray

Site A Site A was from a Smithdale Sandy Loam Area There was a small band of lignite I or H Seam Gray Material with 0.16% Pyritic Sulfur

Site A was from a Smithdale Sandy Loam Area with Medium to High Pyritic Sulfur 0.16% Gray unoxidized was very dark gray, almost black

Methods and Materials Red and Gray Overburden Mixtures (w/w) Gray Portion: 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 % 10 kg per pot Overburdens were Analyzed for Pyritic S, Acid Base Accounting (ABA) and Texture by Energy Labs, College Station, TX Soil Fertility was Analyzed by the Mississippi Extension Soil Fertility Lab (Lancaster Extractant) Included extractable Sulfate-S and Mn

All samples exceed the current 0.10% Pyritic S level 0.8 0.7 XXXX % OVERBURDEN Samples 2, 3 and 4 had a benign light gray color There was no relationship between Total S levels and Organic matter 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 TOT_S SO4_S PYR_S ORG_S 0 Gray 1A Gray 1B Gray 2 Gray 3 Gray 4

24 20 Four of the five samples have acceptable ABA levels 16 12 8 ABA NP PA Balanced by High CaCO 3 Levels from Selma Chalk 4 0-4 -8 Gray 1A Gray 1B Gray 2 Gray 3 Gray 4 ABA - 5 is the Regulatory Limit

Methods The Mississippi Soil Testing laboratory routinely utilizes the Lancaster solution to determine agricultural fertilizer and lime recommendations. It determines most of its parameters with an Optima 4300 DV ICP Spectrophometer including Ca, Mg, P, K, Na, Zn, Mn and SO 4 -S, though Mn and SO 4 -S are not routinely reported. Since 2005, all samples from reclamation research in Mississippi have had SO 4 -S and Mn reported. Samples with known pyritic-s levels of 0.05 (B) to 0.16% (A) were found in some gray unoxidized materials not suitable for topsoil replacement utilization. These were mixed with various portions of suitable red oxidized materials with 0.00 % pyritic-s and tested for extractable sulfate and incubated in the greenhouse for 12 months.

Pearl Millet is Tolerant of Low ph and is a good indicator plant for Loblolly Pines

Acid Base Accounting of Red and Gray Overburden ktonnes CaCO 3 ktonne -1 soil 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0-2 ABA NP PA Red Site A Red Site B Gray Site A Gray Site B

Pyritic S Levels FeS 2 % 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 Red Gray 0.04 0.02 0 Site A Site B

Soil Fertility Analysis All Major Nutrients (P, K, Ca, and Mg) Increase with Increasing Levels of Gray Overburden Pyrite Levels at Site A Exceed Acceptable (Desirable?) Levels Increased Potential Acidity ph and Neutralization Potential at Site B Indicates that this Overburden would be Suitable for only high ph Loving Plants

Red Gray Mixtures with Pyrite in Gray at 0.05 and 0.16% Red Gray s.u. ph 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Change in ph 12 to 24 Months in GH 0 25 50 75 100 LSD SiteA 12Mos SiteA 24 Mos SiteB 12Mos SiteB 24 Mos Site A = 0.16% Pyrite Site B = 0.05% Pyrite In only the Gray Material ; Red = 0.0% Pyrite

Red Gray Mixtures with Pyrite (FeS 2 ) at 0.05 and 0.16% Extractable SO 4 -S mg kg -1 Soil 1200 Extractable SO 4 -S after 12 Months 1000 800 600 400 200 0 0 25 50 75 100 LSD Pyrite 0.16% Pyrite 0.05% Site A Site B

Greenhouse Growth Response of Pearl Millet to Red Oxidized / Gray Unoxidized Mixtures Grams per pot Grams per pot 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 25 50 75 100 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 25 50 75 100 0 Site A Site B 0 Site A Site B August October Site A = 0.16% Pyrite Site B = 0.05% Pyrite In only the Gray Material ; Red = 0.0% Pyrite

Manganese (Mn) Levels in Pearl Millet Growing in Red and Gray Mixtures with Low (Site B) and Moderate (Site A) Pyritic Sulfur mg Mn kg -1 mg Mn kg -1 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Site A Site B 0 25 50 75 100 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Site A Site B 0 25 50 75 100 Site A 0.16% Pyrite Site B 0.05% Pyrite 1600 ppm 500 ppm August October Sufficient at 100 mg Mn kg -1 ; Toxic to pearl millet at > 500-1000 mg Mn kg -1. Toxic to wildlife and Livestock at 2000 ppm (2000 mg kg -1 )

Results and Discussion Extractactable SO 4 - from site B (Moderate pyritic S) was 500 to 1000 mg kg -1 initially and 150 to 180 mg kg -1 SO 4 - S from the low pyritic-s site (A). Apparent ph remained high (7.2 to 7.8) at site A, but it declined to 4.6 to 5.1 in the higher pyritic-s materials. Economical utilization of routine agricultural soil testing provides a viable initial screening tool prior to expenditure of scare resources for expensive overburden testing procedures.

Restoration of soils after strip mining of coal USDA is cooperating to find potential uses for animal and industrial by-products. Soil respread Reclamation Work USDA January 2012 April 2012 site

Sulfate Sulfur and Soluble Salts mg SO4-S kg -1 Soil Soluble Salts as EC ds m -1 converted to ohms x 10-5 cm -1 by 100x 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 SolSalts100x SulfateS Solsalts Duncan Sulfate-S: 344 Soluble Salts: 36

Threshold Sensitivity of Various Crops ds m -1 8 Electrical Conductivity 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Field Crops Legume Crops Forage Grasses Forage Legumes Vegetables ECThreshold ECMinT ECtoMinT NRCS Soil Electrical Guidelines

Conclusions Site A with a Pyrite Level of 0.16% dropped in ph and Pearl Millet had Increased Levels of Mn as Gray Portion Increased Inclusion of Gray Unoxidized Overburden is Not Desirable for Suitable Plant Growth, particularly loblolly pines Utilization of Routine Soil Tests Provides the Mining Company and Landowners Assurance of Good Reclamation Soluble Salts and Extractable Test SO 4 -S can be Used as Initial Indicators

If Sulfate Sulfur > 100 mg kg -1 Suspect Pyrite If Sulfate Sulfur > 100 to 300 mg kg -1 Check History OK if Sulfate Sulfur < 100 mg kg -1

THANK YOU! Questions??