Professional Agreement Invoice and Progress Report

Similar documents
Everything you ever wanted to know about HMA in 30 minutes. John D AngeloD The mouth

What is on the Horizon in HMA. John D AngeloD Federal Highway Administration

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF IDAHO HMA MIXES USING GYRATORY STABILITY

Development and Evaluation of Performance Tests to Enhance Superpave Mix Design and Implementation in Idaho. Quarterly Progress Report QR4

Status Update: NCHRP Project 9-48

2002 Design Guide Preparing for Implementation

The Superpave System Filling the gaps.

DYNAMIC MODULUS MASTER CURVE AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SUPERPAVE HMA CONTAINING VARIOUS POLYMER TYPES

The financial reports included in your board packet represent IHLS Financial Activities through July 31, 2018.

EFFECTS OF TEST VARIABILITY ON MIXTURE VOLUMETRICS AND MIX DESIGN VERIFICATION

Sponsored Financial Services. How We Get Our Funds

AF2903 Road Construction and Maintenance. Volumetric Analysis of Asphalt Mixtures

BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY ROUND-ROBIN USING THE CORELOK VACUUM SEALING DEVICE

NJDOT RESEARCH PROJECT MANAGER: Mr. Anthony Chmiel

Evaluation of Aggregate Structure Stability Using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor

Of course the importance of these three problematics is affected by the local environmental conditions.

Internal Audit Report

2008 SEAUPG CONFERENCE-BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA

Mn/DOT Flexible Pavement Design Mechanistic-Empirical Method

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENCE GUIDE

AN INVESTIGATION OF DYNAMIC MODULUS AND FLOW NUMBER PROPERTIES OF ASPHALT MIXTURES IN WASHINGTON STATE

DESIGN OF ULTRA-THIN BONDED HOT MIX WEARING COURSE (UTBHMWC) MIXTURES

Laboratory Evaluation Report for: Dielectric Pipe Unions

NCAT Report Results of Inter- laboratory Study for AMPT Pooled Fund Study TPF- 5(178) By Adam Taylor, P.E. Nam Tran, Ph.D., P.E.

EVALUATING GEORGIA S COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR STONE MATRIX ASPHALT MIXTURES

IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

RFP # Attachment 5 Revised Proposal Evaluation Form Attachment 5 PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM All proposals will be reviewed for responsiven

E-Community Check Request Checklist

Research Article SGC Tests for Influence of Material Composition on Compaction Characteristic of Asphalt Mixtures

Relationships of HMA In-Place Air Voids, Lift Thickness, and Permeability Volume Two

Implementation of M-E PDG in Kansas

Administration by the CER of the Carbon Revenue Levy

Technical Requirements. Version No. 1.0 Effective Date 10/1/2008

EVALUATION OF VACUUM DRYING FOR DETERMINATION OF BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF HMA SAMPLES

DOE S RADIOLOGICAL TRACEABILITY PROGRAM FOR RADIOANALYTICAL MEASUREMENTS: WORK IN PROGRESS

Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: A User s Perspective. Brian D. Prowell, Ph.D., P.E.

Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design

TARGET AND TOLERANCE STUDY FOR THE ANGLE OF GYRATION USED IN THE SUPERPAVE GYRATORY COMPACTOR (SGC) By

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10-D

ON SITE SYSTEMS Chemical Safety Assistant

County of San Diego, Planning & Development Services

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Academic and Student Affairs ******************************************************************************

Mass Asset Additions. Overview. Effective mm/dd/yy Page 1 of 47 Rev 1. Copyright Oracle, All rights reserved.

APPENDIX A PROGRAM FLOW CHARTS

Flexible Pavement Design

YEAR 2018 CCIL CORRELATION. MIX COMPLIANCE (Ontario)

An evaluation of Pavement ME Design dynamic modulus prediction model for asphalt mixes containing RAP

Implementation Status & Results Ghana GH:Sustainable Rural Water & Sanit Serv (P120026)

Payment of Funds

Dynamic Resilient Modulus and the Fatigue Properties of Superpave HMA Mixes used in the Base Layer of Kansas Flexible Pavements

(add the following:) DESCRIPTION. Contractors Quality Control and Acceptance Procedures will apply to all asphalt as herein specified.

JOB TITLE: CURRENT CLASSIFICATION/GRID POSITION # GIS Coordinator AD Grid Level 6(c) # 420

The purpose of this report is to recommend a Geographic Information System (GIS) Strategy for the Town of Richmond Hill.

Beta Testing and. Validation of HMA PRS 1

July 12, IHLS Finance Committee IHLS Board of Directors. Adrienne L. Elam. Subject: IHLS Financial Reports as of June 30, 2017

Public Disclosure Copy. Implementation Status & Results Report Strengthening Institutional Capacity for Government Effectiveness Project (P149176)

Laboratory Chemical Hood Hibernation

SUPERPAVE VOLUMETRIC MIXTURE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS HANDBOOK

Performance-Based Mix Design

PRECISION OF HAMBURG WHEEL-TRACK TEST (AASHTO T 324)

FIN STABILIZER OPERATIONS TRAINING COURSE

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 709 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF LAND MANAGEMENT SURVEYING AND MAPPING SECTION PHOTOGRAMMETRY UNIT

Precision Estimates of Selected Volumetric Properties of HMA Using Non-Absorptive Aggregate

ISO 844 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Rigid cellular plastics Determination of compression properties

COARSE VERSUS FINE-GRADED SUPERPAVE MIXTURES: COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF RESISTANCE TO RUTTING

Systematic Review Round 7 Application Form

TECHNICAL PAPER INVESTIGATION INTO THE VALIDATION OF THE SHELL FATIGUE TRANSFER FUNCTION

WACEL AGGREGATE LABORATORY TESTING TECHNICIAN

Mechanistic Investigation of Granular Base and Subbase Materials A Saskatchewan Case Study

Pavement Design Where are We? By Dr. Mofreh F. Saleh

Dynamic Modulus of Asphalt Mixtures for Development of

State of Wisconsin/Department of Transportation RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING: JUNE 30, 2008

Unbound Pavement Applications of Excess Foundry System Sands: Subbase/Base Material

Date: June 14, IHLS Finance Committee IHLS Board of Directors. Adrienne L. Elam. Subject: IHLS Financial Reports as of May 31, 2017

Evaluation of the dynamic modulus of asphalt mixture incorporating reclaimed asphalt pavement

RADON AND THE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM

FY2011 Capital Budget Reprogramming

Asphalt Mix Performance Testing on Field Project on MTO Hwy 10

Association Financials

Interconversion of Dynamic Modulus to Creep Compliance and Relaxation Modulus: Numerical Modeling and Laboratory Validation

Mountain View County Gravel Road Maintenance Costs Therese Morris GIS Coordinator March 1, 2012

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE VESYS PROGRAM TO PREDICT CRITICAL PAVEMENT RESPONSES FOR RUTTING AND FATIGUE PERFORMANCES OF PAVEMENT INFRASTRUCTURES

Superpave Implementation Phase II: Comparison of Performance-Related Test Results

Application for Radioactive Material Use

Evaluating Structural Performance of Base/Subbase Materials at the Louisiana Accelerated Pavement Research Facility

Project Plan for the City of Philadelphia Pole and Pole Attachment Geodatabase Design Project

EVALUATION OF COMPACTION SENSITIVITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ASPHALT MIXES. Thesis Submitted to the College of. Graduate Studies and Research

Numerical Simulation of HMA Compaction Using Discrete Element Method

Linear Amplitude Sweep Test:

Inclusion of the Dynamic Angle Validator (DAV) In AASHTO T AASHTO Subcommittee on Materials Branson, Missouri August 2002

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. James R. McCain, Jr. Corporation Secretary/Assistant General Counsel

CERTIFICATE COURSE IN GEO-INFORMATICS 1 (GGFGIS7) 2016

ESTA governance Quality Assurance System for Seed Treatment and Treated Seed

Evaluation of Rutting Depth in Flexible Pavements by Using Finite Element Analysis and Local Empirical Model

GUIDELINES FOR FILMING IN TOMBALL, TEXAS

PAID INVOICE TAX REPORT

GASB 34. Basic Financial Statements M D & A

Asphalt Mix Designer. Module 2 Physical Properties of Aggregate. Specification Year: July Release 4, July

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Transcription:

ITD 0771 (Rev. 10-06) itd.idaho.gov Professional Agreement Invoice and Progress Report Idaho Transportation Department This page must be filled out monthly by the Consultant and forwarded to the Agreement Administrator with the monthly invoice. If necessary, attach additional sheets for continuation. Key Number Project Number Project Name Date ITD RP193 ITD Implementation of the MEPDG 12/10/2009 Agreement Administrator Progress Report Number Agreement Number Ned Parrish KLK557-6 UI0903 Consultant Report/Billing Period (From and To) 11/1/09-11/30/09 Certification of Payment Submitted Certification Date PSA Number Invoice Number Yes No NO INVOICE Description of Work Accomplished During the Month Work during this period included: 1. Samples were prepared for standard Superpave and E* samples for each following Project: SP3-2 JCT US-26 to Bonneville Co. Ln., ID # Stp 6420(106), Key # 7728., SP4-1 Broadway Ave. Rossi St. to Ridenbaugh Cnl. Br., ID # A009(812), Key # 9812, SP4-2 Cleft to Sebree, ID # A 010(533), Key # 10533, SP4-3 Alton Road to MP 454 / Dingle, ID # NH1480(127), Key # 9543. See Appendix A for GS results details. 2. E* testing was done for the following project: One sample of SP5-2 Deep Creek to Devil Creek IC, ID # A 011 (094), Key # 11094. See Appendix B for E* results details. Summary of Work Completed to Date (Milestones Completed and Dates) Please refer to the attached Gantt chart for work progress. Work performed in the project so far covered the installation and running the latest beta version of the MEPDG software (Version 1.0). An inventory of the HMA mixes that were previously sent to our lab have been made. Job Mix formulas for many of these mixes were procured. Asphalt mix testing in Gyratory stability and E* is in progress. The overall progress of the project is estimated to be about 13% complete. Information Required from ITD to Avoid Delays None List Changes in Scope or Complexity Requiring a Supplemental Agreement or Time Adjustments None Consultant's Signature Printed Name and Title Fouad Bayomy, Principal Investigator Page 1 of 2

ITD 0771 (Rev. 10-06) itd.idaho.gov Professional Agreement Invoice and Progress Report Idaho Transportation Department This page must be filled out by the Agreement Administrator. Key Number Program (Work Authority) Progress Report Number Agreement Number RP193 UI0903 Report Reviewed By Review Date The Following was Initiated Status Report A completed status report must accompany all Agreement invoices recommended for payment. The requested percentage measurements of progress to this report are required. Agreement Time Time Passed Percent of Agreement Time Elapsed Percent of Work Completed 32 months 7 months 21.88% 13% Original Agreement Amount Supplemental(s) Current Agreement Amount Payments (Including this Payment) Percent of Agreement Dollars Paid $187,822.04 $0.00 $187,822.04 $16,512.73 9% Certification of Payment Submitted Certification Date This Invoice To Date Negotiated Yes No Fixed Fee $ $ $ If There is a Significant Variance Between the Percentages, Please Explain Consultant Invoice Number NO INVOICE $0.00 This Payment Amount Progress Payment: I certify that the Agreement provisions have been reviewed, the invoice amount checked, progress is substantiated, significant material expenses have support documentation (receipts), and the costs billed are project related and represent the work accomplished. I hereby approve the progress estimate for payment. Final Payment: I certify that all work under the terms of the Agreement has been satisfactorily completed, any capital assets acquired have been delivered or value received, an affidavit of indebtedness received, and the project reviewed or audited and costs verified for work performed. I hereby approve final payment under the Agreement. Agreement Administrator's Signature Date Second (Independent) Reviewer's Signature Page 2 of 2

% Task Completed Phase / Task KLK557 - Implementation of the MEPDG for Flexible Pavements in Idaho - Tentative Time Schedule 2009 2010 2011 Month 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Project Tasks Task 1: Procure and study the latest version of the MEPDG software 1 1 5% 25% Task 2a: Review of other state agencies 1 1 2 implementation efforts ` Task 2b: Submit memorandum summarizing other state implementation efforts to ITD Task 3: Establish input database for materials properties 5% 5% 2% 3% 2% 2% 19% Task 4: Establish input database for traffic load spectra 5% 5% Task 5a: Establish input database for climatic factors Task 5b. Submit completed database with materials, traffic, and climate components for ITD review Task 6: Determine performance and reliability design criteria Task 7: Developing a plan for local calibration and validation Task 8: Implementation of research products and training Task 9. Submit report outline and summary of findings, conclusions and recommendations Task 10:Preparation and external peer review Final Report Review and Submittal Task 11: Final report review by ITD Task 12: Final Submittal

Appendix A - GS Results Table 1. SP3-2 (Project ID# Stp6420-106)_GS Samples Results SP3-2 Sample1 Sample2 Gyratory Stability (kn.m) 14.81 12.01 Air Voids (@ N-design = 75) 4.3% 4.2% CEI (kn.m) 14.81 12.01 Air Voids (@ N-Final = 75) 4.3% 4.2% Starting No. of gyration N G1 15 20 Ending No. of gyration N G2 75 75 Inputs 1- Compactor Data Vertical stress (kpa) 600 600 Angle of gyration (degree) 1.25 1.25 No. of gyrations up to 75 75 2- Specimen Data N design 75 75 Identification SP3-2_GS1 SP3-2_GS2 Diameter (mm) 150 150 Weight (g) 4693.5 4824.1 Mix G mm 2.453 2.453 Final G mb 2.347 2.349 Final height (mm) 116.4 119.9 3- Specific Gravity Sample Dry Weight (g) 4693.5 4824.1 Sample SSD Weight (g) 4705.1 4836.7 Sample Submerged Weight (g) 2705.0 2782.9 Bulk Specific Gravity, Gmb 2.347 2.349 Max. Specific Gravity, Gmm 2.453 2.453 Air Voids (%) 4.3 4.2

Table 2. SP4-1 (Project ID# A009-812)_GS Samples Results SP4-1 Sample1 Sample2 Gyratory Stability (kn.m) 12.55 15.32 Air Voids (@ N-design = 90) 3. 3.1% CEI (kn.m) 12.55 15.32 Air Voids (@ N-Final = 90) 3. 3.1% Starting No. of gyration N G1 22 17 Ending No. of gyration N G2 90 90 Inputs 1- Compactor Data Vertical stress (kpa) 600 600 Angle of gyration (degree) 1.25 1.25 No. of gyrations up to 90 90 2- Specimen Data N design 90 90 Identification SP4-1_GS1 SP4-1_GS2 Diameter (mm) 150 150 Weight (g) 4727 4723.5 Mix G mm 2.434 2.434 Final G mb 2.360 2.359 Final height (mm) 116.2 115.7 3- Specific Gravity Sample Dry Weight (g) 4727 4723.5 Sample SSD Weight (g) 4738.5 4730 Sample Submerged Weight (g) 2735.5 2728 Bulk Specific Gravity, Gmb 2.360 2.359 Max. Specific Gravity, Gmm 2.434 2.434 Air Voids (%) 3.1 3.1

Table 3. SP4-2 (Project ID# A010-533)_GS Samples Results SP4-2 Sample1 Sample2 Gyratory Stability (kn.m) 15.02 14.47 Air Voids (@ N-design = 90) 4.3% 4.5% CEI (kn.m) 15.02 14.47 Air Voids (@ N-Final = 90) 4.3% 4.5% Starting No. of gyration N G1 17 17 Ending No. of gyration N G2 90 90 Inputs 1- Compactor Data Vertical stress (kpa) 600 600 Angle of gyration (degree) 1.25 1.25 No. of gyrations up to 90 90 2- Specimen Data N design 90 90 Identification SP4-2_GS1 SP4-2_GS2 Diameter (mm) 150 150 Weight (g) 4748 4758 Mix G mm 2.435 2.435 Final G mb 2.331 2.326 Final height (mm) 117.4 117.9 3- Specific Gravity Sample Dry Weight (g) 4748 4758 Sample SSD Weight (g) 4754 4765 Sample Submerged Weight (g) 2717 2719 Bulk Specific Gravity, Gmb 2.331 2.326 Max. Specific Gravity, Gmm 2.435 2.435 Air Voids (%) 4.3 4.5

Table 4. SP4-3 (Project ID# NH1480-127)_GS Samples Results SP4-3 Sample1 Sample2 Gyratory Stability (kn.m) 12.39 12.39 Air Voids (@ N-design = 90) 3. 3.9% CEI (kn.m) 12.39 12.39 Air Voids (@ N-Final = 90) 3. 3.9% Starting No. of gyration N G1 29 29 Ending No. of gyration N G2 90 90 Inputs 1- Compactor Data Vertical stress (kpa) 600 600 Angle of gyration (degree) 1.25 1.25 No. of gyrations up to 90 90 2- Specimen Data N design 90 90 Identification SP4-3_GS1 SP4-3_GS2 Diameter (mm) 150 150 Weight (g) 4802.5 4819 Mix G mm 2.462 2.462 Final G mb 2.388 2.365 Final height (mm) 116.4 116.9 3- Specific Gravity Sample Dry Weight (g) 4802.5 4819 Sample SSD Weight (g) 4821.5 4831.5 Sample Submerged Weight (g) 2810 2794 Bulk Specific Gravity, Gmb 2.388 2.365 Max. Specific Gravity, Gmm 2.462 2.462 Air Voids (%) 3.0 3.9

Appendix B - E* Results Summary of E* testing results for the 1 st sample of Project SP5-2 ID # A 011 (094): Table 5. Test Results Summary for 1st Sample of SP5-2 Temperature ( o C) 4.4 o C Frequency (Hz) 25 10 5 1 0.5 0.1 Dynamic modulus (MPa) 14863 13501 12443 9977 8954 6696 Phase angle (Degrees) 9.61 10.78 11.79 14.49 15.81 19.28 Temperature ( o C) 21.1 o C Frequency (Hz) 25 10 5 1 0.5 0.1 Dynamic modulus (MPa) 6727 5495 4674 2943 2376 1327 Phase angle (Degrees) 21.01 23.40 25.13 29.57 30.93 34.47 Temperature ( o C) 37.8 o C Frequency (Hz) 25 10 5 1 0.5 0.1 Dynamic modulus (MPa) 3465 2550 1970 947.5 697.4 311.2 Phase angle (Degrees) 36.67 46.22 51.68 39.90 39.77 38.85 Temperature ( o C) 54.4 o C Frequency (Hz) 25 10 5 1 0.5 0.1 Dynamic modulus (MPa) 954.1 580.3 409.4 176.3 130.3 68.9 Phase angle (Degrees) 120.44 59.39 17.5 12.25 29.04 31.68 10000 Modulus vs. Loading Frequency for 1 st Sample Rep-1 @ 4.4c E*, ksi 1000 100 Rep-1 @ 21.1C Rep-1 @ 37.8C Rep-1 @ 54.4C 10 0.1 1 10 100 Frequency, Hz Figure 1. Modulus vs. Loading Frequency for 1st Sample of SP5-2