COOMET.M.V-S2 (587/RU-a/12) COOMET SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON IN THE FIELD OF MEASUREMENTS OF LIQUIDS KINEMATIC VISCOSITY

Similar documents
COOMET Project 277/UA/03 COOMET L.S-1 Conducting of comparisons of comparators with photoelectric microscopes. Final report

The National Unitary Institution "Belarusian State Institute of Metrology" (BelGIM)

Report on Key Comparison COOMET.AUV.A-K5: Pressure calibration of laboratory standard microphones in the frequency range 2 Hz to 10 khz

Comparison protocol EURAMET project

382/RU/07 SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON

Project: CООМЕТ 390/BY/07. SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON OF STANDARDS OF THE UNIT FOR LENGTH (METRE) IN THE MEASUREMENT RANGE FROM 0,1 TO 100 mm

A bilateral comparison of a 1 kg platinum standard

AFRIMETS. Supplementary Comparison Programme. Calibration of Gauge Blocks. by Mechanical Comparison Method AFRIMETS.L S3.

EUROMET Project 702 EUROMET.M.D-K4

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt

Final Report On COOMET Vickers PTB/VNIIFTRI Key Comparison (COOMET.M.H- K1.b and COOMET.M.H- K1.c)

Centre for Metrology and Accreditation, MIKES

Technical Protocol of the Bilateral Comparison in Primary Angular Vibration Calibration CCAUV.V-S1

Final Report On RMO VICKERS KEY COMPARISON COOMET M.H-K1

Technical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5

Final Report on COOMET Supplementary Comparison of Capacitance at 100 pf (COOMET.EM-S4)

REPORT to the CCT on Comparison COOMET. T-K3 (COOMET theme No. 285/RU-а/03) Final Report

Final report on CCQM-K36.1 with erratum

Final Report of COOMET.T-K7: Regional key comparison of water triple point cells (COOMET theme No 395/BY/07)

Appendix B1. Reports of SMU

Report on EURAMET.M.M-S9

Final Report on APMP.M.M-K4.1 - Bilateral Comparison of 1 kg Stainless Steel Mass Standards between KRISS and A*STAR

Final Report on COOMET Key Comparison of Capacitance at 10 pf (COOMET.EM-K4)

ANNEXE 8. Technical protocols for the interlaboratory comparisons

EURAMET Project no Inter-comparison of a 1000 L proving tank

Euramet project 1187 Comparison of Instrument Current Transformers up to 10 ka. Technical protocol (March 2012)

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF PLATINUM RESISTANCE THERMOMETERS BETWEEN CHILE AND ECUADOR

Final Report on Comparison of Hydraulic Pressure Balance Effective Area Determination in the Range up to 80 MPa

Final Report 06 July 2006 Frank Wilkinson, Gan Xu, and Yuanjie Liu

High pressure comparison among seven European national laboratories

Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM-S19 EURAMET Project No. 688

APMP Key Comparison of DC Voltage at V and 10 V

Improvement of traceability in the field of mass concentration measurements of particles in aerodisperse media carried out in the Russian Federation

Comparison of primary standards for liquid micro flow rates

INTERLABORATORY MASS COMPARISON BETWEEN LABORATORIES BELONGING TO SIM SUB-REGIONS COORDINATED BY CENAM (SIM.7.31a & SIM.7.31b)

RECENT ILC ACTIVITY IN ROMANIAN MASS MEASUREMENTS

Portuguese Institute for Quality. Contents

Supplementary comparison SIM.M.FF-S12. Final Report for Volume of Liquids at 20 L

Final Report EUROMET PROJECT 818 CALIBRATION FACTOR OF THERMISTOR MOUNTS. Jan P.M. de Vreede

P1-APMP.EM-S9. VNIIM/KRISS Bilateral Comparison of DC Magnetic Flux Density by Means of a Transfer Standard Coil. TECHNICAL PROTOCOL

Bureau International des Poids et Mesures

ЕВРО-АЗИАТСКОЕ СОТРУДНИЧЕСТВО ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫХ МЕТРОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЙ (KOOMET)

R SANAS Page 1 of 7

Comparison of V and 10 V DC Voltage References

National Physical Laboratory Hampton Road Teddington Middlesex United Kingdom TW11 0LW

COOMET Project 507/BY/10. Supplementary COMPARISON OF LENGTH STANDARDS FOR MEASURING GEAR PARAMETERS COOMET.L- S10. Final Report

OIML D 28 DOCUMENT. Edition 2004 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION. Conventional value of the result of weighing in air

SAMM POLICY 5 (SP5) POLICY ON MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY REQUIREMENTS FOR SAMM TESTING LABORATORIES Issue 2, 28 February 2007 (Amd. 1, 11 August 2014)

Fluid Mechanics Introduction

WGFF Guidelines for CMC Uncertainty and Calibration Report Uncertainty

H1: Metrological support. Milena Horvat, Polona Vreča, Tea Zuliani, Radojko Jaćimović, Radmila Milačič

INTERNATIONAL KEY COMPARISON OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON FLOW FACILITIES CCM-FF-K2 (Final Report) BIPM Pavillon de Breteuil F Sevres France

Force Key Comparison APMP.M.F-K2.a and APMP.M.F-K2.b (50 kn and 100 kn) Final Report 6 August Pilot: KRISS, Republic of Korea Yon-Kyu Park

A guide to expression of uncertainty of measurements QA4EO-QAEO-GEN-DQK-006

OA03 UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN CHEMICAL TESTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SIST EN ISO/IEC Table of contents

International Atomic Energy Agency. Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications. IAEA Environment Laboratories

International Atomic Energy Agency. Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications. IAEA Environment Laboratories

Calibration Models and Uncertainty Analysis of the Euroloop Liquid Hydrocarbon Flow Facility

Final Report - Version B.5

Part 5: Total stations

Document No: TR 12 Issue No: 1

Report of the key comparison APMP.QM-K19 APMP comparison on ph measurement of borate buffer

DECISION LIMITS FOR THE CONFIRMATORY QUANTIFICATION OF THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES

English - Or. English NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY STEERING COMMITTEE FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY

Provläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO Second edition

CCL-K5. CMM 1D: Step Gauge and Ball Bars. Final Report

GULF ASSOCIATION FOR METROLOGY. Calibration of Gauge Blocks by Mechanical Comparison Method GULFMET.L-S1

This document is a preview generated by EVS

COMPARISON OF HUMIDITY MEASUREMENTS USING A DEW POINT METER AS A TRANSFER STANDARD APMP-IC-1-97 REPORT

TYPICAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY DEFINED BY AN FPG8601 FORCE BALANCED PISTON GAUGE

ITTC Recommended Procedures

Final Report CCM.V-K2 Comparison

Provläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO Second edition

Country Fiche Estonia

Final Report. CCEM Comparison of 10 pf Capacitance Standards. Anne-Marie Jeffery Electricity Division NIST May 2000 Revised March 2002

Calibration of long gauge blocks. Technical protocol (Issue 1)

Metrology Principles for Earth Observation: the NMI view. Emma Woolliams 17 th October 2017

Final Report on the Torque Key Comparison CCM.T-K2 Measurand Torque: 0 kn m, 10 kn m, 20 kn m Dirk Röske 1), Koji Ogushi 2)

A drop forms when liquid is forced out of a small tube. The shape of the drop is determined by a balance of pressure, gravity, and surface tension

A comparison of primary platinum-iridium kilogram mass standards among eighteen European NMIs

PROTOCOL OF MASS AND VOLUME COMPARISONS BETWEEN SIM NMIs

Radiation Thermometry Review Protocol

APPENDIX G EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY

UNCERTAINTY SCOPE OF THE FORCE CALIBRATION MACHINES. A. Sawla Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Bundesallee 100, D Braunschweig, Germany

METHODS TO CONFIRM THE MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY OF THE FORCE STANDARD MACHINES AFTER REINSTALLATION

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

SIM AUV.A-K1.prev Microphone Intercomparison

Certified Reference Material - Certificate of Analysis

International Comparison

Comparison of measurement uncertainty budgets for calibration of sound calibrators: Euromet project 576

Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt

Ajchara Charoensook, Chaiwat Jassadajin. National Institute of Metrology Thailand. Henry Chen, Brian Ricketts and Leigh Johnson

Report on APMP Supplementary Comparison High precision roundness measurement APMP.L-S4. Final report

EU DIRECTIVES PREPACKAGES AND IMPLEMENTATIONS IN CROATIAN NATIONAL LEGISLATION 76/211/EEC 2007/45/EC 75/107/EEC

CCQM-K27.2 Second Subsequent Study: Determination of Ethanol in Aqueous Media Final Report

Measurement Uncertainty, March 2009, F. Cordeiro 1

Supplementary Comparison EUROMET.EM-S23 EURAMET PROJECT No 815 FINAL REPORT

Uncertainty Propagation for Force Calibration Systems

Draft protocol of APMP.RI(I)-K8 Reference air kerma rate for HDR Ir-192 brachytherapy sources

Certificate of Accreditation

Transcription:

Final Report COOMET.M.V-S2 (587/RU-a/12) COOMET SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON IN THE FIELD OF MEASUREMENTS OF LIQUIDS KINEMATIC VISCOSITY List of authors: a) Coordinator of comparison: Alexey Demyanov, D. I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology (VNIIM) 190005, Russia, St.Petersburg Moskovsky pr., 19 e-mail: A.A.Demyanov@vniim.ru phone: +7 812 323-9605 fax: +7 812 323-9671 b) Researcher: Anastasiya Tsurko, D. I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology (VNIIM) 190005, Russia, St.Petersburg Moskovsky pr., 19 e-mail: A.A.Tsurko@vniim.ru phone: +7 812 323-9671 fax: +7 812 323-9671

2 Abstract This report describes the COOMET Supplementary comparison of liquid kinematic viscosity standards of two National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) carried out in the period from February and May, 2013. Three Newtonian liquids with nominal kinematic viscosities of 20 mm²/s, 100 mm²/s, 1000 mm²/s at 20 C were used to determine the degrees of equivalence between the NMIs.The mean values obtained by VNIIM- participant in the CCM.V-K1 comparison, were used as reference values for this COOMET comparison. The relative standard uncertainty of the reference valuesranges from 0,096 % at 20 mm²/s to 0,4 % at 1000 mm²/s and 20 C.

3 CONTENTS CONTENTS... 3 1. Introduction... 4 2. Participants... 4 3. Organization of comparisons... 4 4. Description of the measurement method... 6

4 1. Introduction This comparison was conducted by decision of the 16th Meeting of COOMET TC 1.6 "Mass and related quantities", held in St. Petersburg from 27 to 30 September 2011. The pilot laboratory was VNIIM. Each NMI presented the results of measurements with corresponding uncertainties and uncertainty budget. The aim of the present comparison was to confirm the calibration and measurement capabilities (CMC) of the participating NMIs. 2. Participants Information about the participants is shown in Table 1. Table 1. Participants in COOMET.M.V-S2 NMI Address NMI abbreviation 1 D. I. Mendeleyev 190005, Russia, VNIIM Institute for St.Petersburg Metrology Moskovsky pr., 19 2 The Republican State Enterprise with the right of economic conducting The Kazakhstan Institute of Metrology 3. Organization of comparisons 010000, Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, left Bank, Orynbor str., 11 KazInMetr Contact person Alexey Demyanov E-mail, phone, fax e-mail:a.a.demyanov@vniim.ru phone: +7 812 323-9605 fax: +7 812 323-9671 Ulan e-mail: ulan_mol@mail.ru Moldagana phone: +7 7172 270-958 -pov The comparison schedule and additional information are given in tables 2 and 3, respectively. Table 2. Comparison schedule Date Event September, 2011 Decision to carry out the comparison taken at the 16th Meeting of COOMET TK 1.6 May, 2012 Preparation of the first draft of Technical Protocol September, 2012 Approval of the Protocol at the 17th Meeting of COOMET TK 1.6 October, 2012 Acquisition of liquids, vials and preparation of specimens November, 2012 Measurements of liquids by the pilot laboratory, testing their stability and uniformity, shipping to the participating laboratories January, 2013 Measurements in by participating laboratories March, 2013 Sending liquids to the pilot laboratory, implementation of control measures in the pilot laboratory September, 2013 Testing the stability of liquids at 20 ºС. Receiving reports from the participants October, 2013 Draft A report December, 2013 Draft B report

Table 3. Additional information on the COOMET.M.V-S2 comparison Information Note 1 Circulation of the transfer standards Radial 5 2 Purpose of the comparison Confirmation of measurement and calibration capabilities (CMC) claimed by the participating NMIs 3 Dates of measurements VNIIM "20" 23.04.2013 "100" 17.04.2013 "1000" 25.04.2013 KazInMetr "20" 26.04.2013 "100" 27.04.2013 "1000" 04.05.2013 4 Measurement conditions VNIIM "20" t=21,1 ºС, p=101,2 kpa, φ=45,3 % "100" t=21,3 ºС, p=101,6 kpa, φ=44,8 % "1000" t=20,8 ºС, p=100,4 kpa, φ=44,3 % KazInMetr "20" t=22,4 ºС, p=97kpa, φ=43 % "100" t=24,2 ºС, p=96,6 kpa, φ=33 % "1000" t=21,3 ºС, p=97,9 kpa, φ=32,4 % 5 Transfer standards: «20», «100» и «1000» Name of the standard Liquid Type REV Model of the standard «20», «100», «1000» Packaging description Bottles of dark color with a capacity of 500 ml. 6 Packing and unpacking Packing content Three dark bottle of 500 ml each containing liquid «20», «100» and «1000» Sequence of actions in the NMI when unpacking Upon receipt, the vials are kept unopened in the standard of comparison the participating laboratory for at least two days. Bottles and seals shall be opened only for measurements. Before opening the bottles, you must still check them every time for visible damages or dirt. All significant problems should be specified in the report. Note: Physical constants of liquids are shown in tables 4 and 5.

Table 4. Temperature coefficient of volume expansion Liquid β, kg/(m 3 K) Uncertainty, kg/(m 3 K), k=1 1 «20» 0,60 0,05 2 «100» 0,60 0,05 3 «1000» 0,60 0,05 Table 5. The nominal value of the surface tension and density values Liquid, mn/m Density, kg/m 3 1 «20» 31 860 2 «100» 31 880 3 «1000» 31 890 4. Description of the measurement method 6 All participants, when measuring the viscosity of each liquid sample, use two Ubbelohde viscometer (which are national standards in the participating countries) with close values of the calibration constant. The viscosity of each liquid sample was measured 10 times by each viscometer at the temperature of 20 C. The kinematic viscosity was calculated by the formula 1: γ - kinematic viscosity mm 2 /s;b - correction for the loss of fluid kinetic energy, mm 2 ;K - calibration constant of the viscometer, mm 2 /s 2 ;t - time of liquid flow through the capillary viscometer, s;g, g cal - the acceleration of gravity at the place of measurement of viscosity and calibration of viscometer, m 2 /s. The relative expanded uncertainty of measurement of the fluid viscosity (Uoγ) was calculated by each participant. Formula 2 was used to calculate the uncertainty in measurement of the kinematic viscosity of the samples:. (1) (2) u ok -relative standard measurement uncertainty constant K of the primary standard; u ob - relative standard uncertainty of measurement of the constant B of the primary standard; u ϑγ - relative standard uncertainty caused by the temperature gradient; u осх - relative standard uncertainty of fluid flow through the capillary viscometer; u oτ - relative standard uncertainty of the time counter.

7 5. Comparison results The measurement results and the value of the relative expanded uncertainty of measurement of kinematic viscosity of the liquid obtained by the participants received the comparisons are shown in Table 6. Table 6. Measurement results and values of the expanded uncertainty in measurement of the kinematic viscosity of liquids. COOMET.M.V-S2 (587/RU-a/12) SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISONS OF COOMET IN THE FIELD OF MEASUREMENTS OF LIQUIDS KINEMATIC VISCOSITY Participant Liquid "20" Liquid "100" Liquid "1000" γ, (mm 2 /s) u γ,% Δ γ, (mm 2 /s) y, (mm 2 /s) u γ,% Δ γ, (mm 2 /s) y, (mm 2 /s) u γ,% Δ γ, (mm 2 /s) VNIIM 19,446 0,096 112,49 0,10 1007,3 0,1 KazInMetr 19,453 0,255 + 0,007 112,68 0,32 + 0,19 1006,8 0,4-0,5 Note: The values of VNIIM are taken as the reference values; u γ,%- expanded relative uncertainty of measurement of viscosity of liquid by each participant (k=2); Δ γ - absolute deviation of the result KazInMetr from VNIIM result. Figs. 1 to 3 show the results of the supplementary comparison.

8 Fig. 1. Liquid "20" (mm 2 /s) Fig. 2. Liquid "100" (mm 2 /s) Fig. 3. Liquid "1000" (mm 2 /s)

9 6. Uncertainty budgets and confirmation of calibration and measurement capabilities (CMCs) of the participating NMIs Uncertainty budget is shown in Table 7. Table 7. Uncertainty budget Uncertainty VNIIM KazInMetr Liquid Liquid "20" "100" "1000" "20" "100" "1000" 1 Relative standard uncertainty of fluid flow through the capillary 5,53 10-4 5,12 10-4 3,51 10-4 0,19 10-4 2,91 10-4 0,96 10-3 viscometers(u осх ) 2 Relative standard measurement uncertainty constant k of the 3,91 10-4 4,48 10-4 5,45 10-4 1,25 10-3 1,6 10-3 1,65 10-3 primary standard (u ok ) 3 Relative standard uncertainty in measurement of the constant b 1,625 10-4 in the primary standard (u ob ) 4 Relative standard uncertainty caused by the temperature 2,198 10-4 2,21 10-4 2,80 10-4 0,25 10-3 gradient(u ϑγ ) 5 Relative standard uncertainty of the time counter (u oτ ) 2,968 10-5 5,13 10-5 0,57 10-6 0,50 10-5 0,46 10-5 0,49 10-5 6 The combined standard uncertainty in measurement of kinematic viscosity of liquids 0,479 10-3 0,501 10-3 0,613 10-3 1,275 10-3 1,632 10-3 1,802 10-3 (u c ) 7 Relative expanded uncertainty in measurement of kinematic viscosity of liquids (U op ), k=2 0,0958 0,100 0,12 0,2548 0,326 0,36 The participants CMCs was assessed according to the COOMET "Guideline on COOMET supplementary comparison evaluation" (R/GM/19:2008). Сomparison COOMET.MV-S2 (587/RU-a/12) was classified as type II, in accordance with COOMET R/GM/19:2008. The procedure for evaluation of data on this comparison type is as follows:: 1. Reference value of the supplementary comparison: The reference laboratory (VNIIM) on the basis of measurement results or calculations establishes the supplementary comparisons reference value the traveling standard value assessment and corresponding uncertainty: x ref, u(x ref ). 2. Checks the consistency of the comparison data (criterion E n ) according to formula 3: (3) If the criterion E n value calculated in accordance with the result provided by i-th NMI doesn t exceed 1 with the coverage level 0,95, then it could be acknowledged that this NMI data confirm announced uncertainties. Note:The covariance value for these comparisons is set to zero, cov(x i,x ref )=0. The estimated results of this supplementary comparison are shown in Table 8.

Table 8. Evaluated data obtained in the supplementary comparison Liquid (x KazInMetr -x ref ), mm 2 /s u 2 (x KazInMetr )+u 2 (x ref ) E n "20" 0,007 0,0717 0,013 "100" 0,19 0,1124 0,283 "1000" 0,5 0,17 0,61 10 7. Conclusion The data of participants are in agreement with respect rthe the the criterion En, which confirms the stated uncertainty claimed by the KazInMetr. 8. Acknowledge We are grateful to the KazInMetr for the active participation in these comparisons.

8. References 1. JGCM100:2008 - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). 2. JGCM200:2008 International vocabulary of metrology (VIM). 11 3. COOMET R/GM/11:2010 "CООМЕТ Recommendations. Regulations on comparisons national standards NMI COOMET". 4. COOMETR/GM/19:2008 "Guideline on evaluation of the results obtained in COOMET supplementary comparisons".