Spectra, dynamical systems, and geometry. Fields Medal Symposium, Fields Institute, Toronto. Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Similar documents
Spectral theory, geometry and dynamical systems

Chaos, Quantum Mechanics and Number Theory

Quantum Billiards. Martin Sieber (Bristol) Postgraduate Research Conference: Mathematical Billiard and their Applications

Arithmetic quantum chaos and random wave conjecture. 9th Mathematical Physics Meeting. Goran Djankovi

Quantum ergodicity. Nalini Anantharaman. 22 août Université de Strasbourg

Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the Laplacian. Andrew Hassell

Fractal uncertainty principle and quantum chaos

What is quantum unique ergodicity?

A gentle introduction to Quantum Ergodicity

Ergodicity of quantum eigenfunctions in classically chaotic systems

Recent developments in mathematical Quantum Chaos, I

Quantum Ergodicity for a Class of Mixed Systems

On the sup-norm problem for arithmetic hyperbolic 3-manifolds

Bouncing Ball Modes and Quantum Chaos

Quantummushrooms,scars,andthe high-frequencylimitofchaoticeigenfunctions

Strichartz estimates for the Schrödinger equation on polygonal domains

Order and chaos in wave propagation

Optimal shape and placement of actuators or sensors for PDE models

Quantum Ergodicity and Benjamini-Schramm convergence of hyperbolic surfaces

Variations on Quantum Ergodic Theorems. Michael Taylor

Quantum symbolic dynamics

MAT 280: Laplacian Eigenfunctions: Theory, Applications, and Computations Lecture 7: Nodal Sets

The Berry-Tabor conjecture

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Peer reviewed version. Link to published version (if available): /

Recent Progress on QUE

Ergodic billiards that are not quantum unique ergodic

Zeros and Nodal Lines of Modular Forms

(5) N #{j N : X j+1 X j [a, b]}

Recent Progress on the Quantum Unique Ergodicity Conjecture

Asymptotics of polynomials and eigenfunctions

Eigenvalue statistics and lattice points

Math 5587 Midterm II Solutions

Applications of measure rigidity: from number theory to statistical mechanics

BOUNCING BALL MODES AND QUANTUM CHAOS

Ergodic Theory of Interval Exchange Transformations

0. Introduction. Suppose that M is a compact Riemannian manifold. The Laplace operator is given in local coordinates by f = g 1/2

MATHEMATICS: CONCEPTS, AND FOUNDATIONS - Introduction To Mathematical Aspects of Quantum Chaos - Dieter Mayer

THE SEMICLASSICAL THEORY OF DISCONTINUOUS SYSTEMS AND RAY-SPLITTING BILLIARDS

QUANTUM ERGODICITY AND BEYOND. WITH A GALLERY OF PICTURES.

The Fourier series for a 2π-periodic function

Research Statement. Jayadev S. Athreya. November 7, 2005

Introduction Hyperbolic systems Beyond hyperbolicity Counter-examples. Physical measures. Marcelo Viana. IMPA - Rio de Janeiro

Applications of homogeneous dynamics: from number theory to statistical mechanics

arxiv: v2 [math.sp] 1 Jun 2016

Control from an Interior Hypersurface

Microlocal limits of plane waves

Plane hyperbolic geometry

THE SELBERG TRACE FORMULA OF COMPACT RIEMANN SURFACES

Part IB GEOMETRY (Lent 2016): Example Sheet 1

Global Harmonic Analysis and the Concentration of Eigenfunctions, Part III:

Continued fractions and geodesics on the modular surface

Nodal lines of Laplace eigenfunctions

Fluctuation statistics for quantum star graphs

Spectral Theory on Hyperbolic Surfaces

arxiv: v1 [nlin.cd] 27 May 2008

Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of a clover plate

Mathematical Billiards

Stadium Billiards. Charles Kankelborg. March 11, 2016

LOCALIZED EIGENFUNCTIONS: HERE YOU SEE THEM, THERE YOU

Fuchsian groups. 2.1 Definitions and discreteness

Math 3150 HW 3 Solutions

Advances in Manifold Learning Presented by: Naku Nak l Verm r a June 10, 2008

Asymptotic rate of quantum ergodicity in chaotic Euclidean billiards

ESI Lectures on Semiclassical Analysis and Quantum Ergodicity 2012

Geometric and Arithmetic Aspects of Homogeneous Dynamics

McGill University April 20, Advanced Calculus for Engineers

ADELIC DYNAMICS AND ARITHMETIC QUANTUM UNIQUE ERGODICITY

THE DOUBLE COVER RELATIVE TO A CONVEX DOMAIN AND THE RELATIVE ISOPERIMETRIC INEQUALITY

Estimates from below for the spectral function and for the remainder in Weyl s law

Separation of Variables. A. Three Famous PDE s

Differential Geometry II Lecture 1: Introduction and Motivation

OPEN PROBLEMS IN DYNAMICS AND RELATED FIELDS

Arithmetic Quantum Unique Ergodicity for Γ \H

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MATHEMATICAL QUANTUM CHAOS PRELIMINARY VERSION/COMMENTS APPRECIATED

Geometry and analysis on hyperbolic manifolds

lim f f(kx)dp(x) = cmf

arxiv: v2 [math.sp] 2 Sep 2015

The Sound of Symmetry

Growth of energy density for Klein-Gordon equation coupled to a chaotic oscillator

2016 EF Exam Texas A&M High School Students Contest Solutions October 22, 2016

Lecture Notes 4: Fourier Series and PDE s

(Ortho)spectra and identities TIT 2012

This is a repository copy of The semiclassical theory of discontinuous systems and ray-splitting billiards.

Gaussian Fields and Percolation

Automorphic coefficient sums and the quantum ergodicity question

NON-UNIVERSALITY OF THE NAZAROV-SODIN CONSTANT

On the Topography of Maass Waveforms for PSL(2, Z)

A glimpse of Fourier analysis

Bianchi Orbifolds of Small Discriminant. A. Hatcher

Derivatives in General Relativity

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 12

On the Birkhoff Conjecture for Convex Billiards. Alfonso Sorrentino

Math 201 Assignment #11

Ihara zeta functions and quantum chaos

1 Wave Equation on Finite Interval

Nodal Sets of High-Energy Arithmetic Random Waves

International Conference on Spectral Geometry Dartmouth College, July 19 23, Abstracts 1

Theory of Adiabatic Invariants A SOCRATES Lecture Course at the Physics Department, University of Marburg, Germany, February 2004

Recent Developments in Mathematical Quantum Chaos

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

Transcription:

Spectra, dynamical systems, and geometry Fields Medal Symposium, Fields Institute, Toronto Tuesday, October 1, 2013 Dmitry Jakobson April 16, 2014

M = S 1 = R/(2πZ) - a circle. f (x) - a periodic function, f (x + 2π) = f (x). Laplacian is the second derivative: f = f. Eigenfunction φ = φ λ with eigenvalue λ 0 satisfies φ + λφ = 0. On the circle, such functions are constants (eigenvalue 0), sin(nx) and cos(nx), where n N. Eiegvalues: (sin(nx)) + n 2 sin(nx) = 0, (cos(nx)) + n 2 cos(nx) = 0. Fact: every periodic (square-integrable) function can be expanded into Fourier series: f (x) = a 0 + (a n cos(nx) + b n sin(nx)). n=1 Can use them to solve heat and wave equations:

Heat equation describes how heat propagates in a solid body. Temperature u = u(x, t) depends on position x and time t. The initial temperature is u(x, 0) = f (x) = a 0 + u t 2 u x 2 = 0. (a n cos(nx) + b n sin(nx)). n=1

One can check that and u 0 (x, t) = a 0 u n (x, t) = (a n cos(nx) + b n sin(nx)) e n2t, n 1 are solutions to the heat equation. The general solution with initial temperature f (x) is given by u n (x, t). n=0

One can also use Fourier series to solve the wave equation 2 u t 2 2 u x 2 = 0. The elementary solutions will be u n (x, t) = (a n cos(nx) + b n sin(nx))(c n cos(nt) + d n sin(nt)). This equation also describes the vibrating string (where u is the amplitude of vibration). Musicians playing string instruments (guitar, violin) knew some facts about eigenvalues a long time ago (that s how music scale was invented).

In Quantum mechanics, eigenfunctions sin(nx) and cos(nx) describe pure states of a quantum particle that lives on the circle S 1. Their squares sin 2 (nx) and cos 2 (nx) describe the probability density of the particle. The probability P n ([a, b]) that the particle φ n (x) = 2 sin(nx) lies in the interval [a, b] [0, 2π] is equal to 1 b φ n (x) 2 dx. 2π a Question: How does P n ([a, b]) behave as n? Answer: b a P n ([a, b]) 2π The particle φ n (x) becomes uniformly distributed in [0, 2π], as n. This is the Quantum Unique Ergodicity theorem on the circle!

Proof: Let h(x) be an observable (test function). To observe the particle φ n, we compute the integral P n (h) := 1 2π h(x)φ 2 2π n(x)dx = 1 2π h(x) 2 sin 2 (nx)dx. 0 2π 0 We know that 2 sin 2 (nx) = 1 cos(2nx). The integral is therefore equal to 1 2π h(x)dx 1 2π h(x) cos(2nx)dx. 2π 0 2π 0 The second integral is proportional to the 2n-th Fourier coefficient of the function h, and goes to zero by Riemann-Lebesgue lemma in analysis, as n. Therefore, P n (h) 1 2π h(x)dx, as n. 2π 0

To complete the proof, take h = χ([a, b]), the characteristic function of the interval [a, b]. Q.E.D. What happens in higher dimensions, for example if M is a surface?

Example 1: M is the flat 2-torus T 2 = R 2 /(2πZ) 2. f = 2 f x 2 + 2 f y 2. Periodic eigenfunctions on the 2-torus T 2 : φ λ (x ± 2π, y ± 2π) = φ λ (x, y). They are sin(mx) sin(ny), sin(mx) cos(ny), cos(mx) sin(ny), cos(mx) cos(ny), λ = m 2 + n 2.

Example 2: M is a domain in the hyperbolic plane H 2 : The Laplacian is given by {(x, y) : y > 0}. ( f = y 2 2 ) f x 2 + 2 f y 2. Eigenfunctions are functions on H 2 periodic with respect to several isometries of H 2 (motions that preserve lengths in the H 2 ).

Geodesics are shortest paths from one point to another. They are straight lines in R 2, and vertical lines and semicircles with the diameter on the real axis in H 2.

M is a hyperbolic polygon whose sides are paired by isometries. Here are eigenfunctions of the hyperbolic Laplacian on the modular surface H 2 /PSL(2, Z), Hejhal:

Curvature: Take a ball B(x, r) centred at x of radius r in M. Then as r 0, its area satisfies [ Area(B(x, r)) = πr 2 1 K (x)r 2 ] +... 12 The number K (x) is called the Gauss curvature at x M. Flat: In R 2, we have K (x) = 0 for every x. Negative curvature: In H 2, K (x) = 1 for every x. So, in H 2 circles are bigger than in R 2. Positive curvature: On the round sphere S 2, K (x) = +1 for all x. So, in S 2 circles are smaller than in R 2.

Curvature: Take a ball B(x, r) centred at x of radius r in M. Then as r 0, its area satisfies [ Area(B(x, r)) = πr 2 1 K (x)r 2 ] +... 12 The number K (x) is called the Gauss curvature at x M. Flat: In R 2, we have K (x) = 0 for every x. Negative curvature: In H 2, K (x) = 1 for every x. So, in H 2 circles are bigger than in R 2. Positive curvature: On the round sphere S 2, K (x) = +1 for all x. So, in S 2 circles are smaller than in R 2.

Curvature: Take a ball B(x, r) centred at x of radius r in M. Then as r 0, its area satisfies [ Area(B(x, r)) = πr 2 1 K (x)r 2 ] +... 12 The number K (x) is called the Gauss curvature at x M. Flat: In R 2, we have K (x) = 0 for every x. Negative curvature: In H 2, K (x) = 1 for every x. So, in H 2 circles are bigger than in R 2. Positive curvature: On the round sphere S 2, K (x) = +1 for all x. So, in S 2 circles are smaller than in R 2.

Curvature: Take a ball B(x, r) centred at x of radius r in M. Then as r 0, its area satisfies [ Area(B(x, r)) = πr 2 1 K (x)r 2 ] +... 12 The number K (x) is called the Gauss curvature at x M. Flat: In R 2, we have K (x) = 0 for every x. Negative curvature: In H 2, K (x) = 1 for every x. So, in H 2 circles are bigger than in R 2. Positive curvature: On the round sphere S 2, K (x) = +1 for all x. So, in S 2 circles are smaller than in R 2.

Geodesic flow: start at x M, go with unit speed along the unique geodesic γ v in a direction v for time t; stop at a point y on γ v. Let w be the tangent vector to γ v at y. Then by definition the geodesic flow G t is defined by G t (x, v) = (y, w). Negative curvature: geodesics never focus: if v 1, v 2 are two directions at x, and G t (x, v 1 ) = (y 1, w 1 ), G t (x, v 2 ) = (y 2, w 2 ), then the distance between w 1 (t) and w 2 (t) grows exponentially in t. If K < 0 everywhere, then geodesic flow is chaotic: small changes in initial direction lead to very big changes after long time. It is ergodic: almost all trajectories become uniformly distributed. Weather prediction is difficult since the dynamical systems arising there are chaotic! Positive curvature: If K > 0 everywhere, the light rays will focus (like through a lens).

Geodesic flow: start at x M, go with unit speed along the unique geodesic γ v in a direction v for time t; stop at a point y on γ v. Let w be the tangent vector to γ v at y. Then by definition the geodesic flow G t is defined by G t (x, v) = (y, w). Negative curvature: geodesics never focus: if v 1, v 2 are two directions at x, and G t (x, v 1 ) = (y 1, w 1 ), G t (x, v 2 ) = (y 2, w 2 ), then the distance between w 1 (t) and w 2 (t) grows exponentially in t. If K < 0 everywhere, then geodesic flow is chaotic: small changes in initial direction lead to very big changes after long time. It is ergodic: almost all trajectories become uniformly distributed. Weather prediction is difficult since the dynamical systems arising there are chaotic! Positive curvature: If K > 0 everywhere, the light rays will focus (like through a lens).

Geodesic flow: start at x M, go with unit speed along the unique geodesic γ v in a direction v for time t; stop at a point y on γ v. Let w be the tangent vector to γ v at y. Then by definition the geodesic flow G t is defined by G t (x, v) = (y, w). Negative curvature: geodesics never focus: if v 1, v 2 are two directions at x, and G t (x, v 1 ) = (y 1, w 1 ), G t (x, v 2 ) = (y 2, w 2 ), then the distance between w 1 (t) and w 2 (t) grows exponentially in t. If K < 0 everywhere, then geodesic flow is chaotic: small changes in initial direction lead to very big changes after long time. It is ergodic: almost all trajectories become uniformly distributed. Weather prediction is difficult since the dynamical systems arising there are chaotic! Positive curvature: If K > 0 everywhere, the light rays will focus (like through a lens).

Geodesic flow: start at x M, go with unit speed along the unique geodesic γ v in a direction v for time t; stop at a point y on γ v. Let w be the tangent vector to γ v at y. Then by definition the geodesic flow G t is defined by G t (x, v) = (y, w). Negative curvature: geodesics never focus: if v 1, v 2 are two directions at x, and G t (x, v 1 ) = (y 1, w 1 ), G t (x, v 2 ) = (y 2, w 2 ), then the distance between w 1 (t) and w 2 (t) grows exponentially in t. If K < 0 everywhere, then geodesic flow is chaotic: small changes in initial direction lead to very big changes after long time. It is ergodic: almost all trajectories become uniformly distributed. Weather prediction is difficult since the dynamical systems arising there are chaotic! Positive curvature: If K > 0 everywhere, the light rays will focus (like through a lens).

Geodesic flow: start at x M, go with unit speed along the unique geodesic γ v in a direction v for time t; stop at a point y on γ v. Let w be the tangent vector to γ v at y. Then by definition the geodesic flow G t is defined by G t (x, v) = (y, w). Negative curvature: geodesics never focus: if v 1, v 2 are two directions at x, and G t (x, v 1 ) = (y 1, w 1 ), G t (x, v 2 ) = (y 2, w 2 ), then the distance between w 1 (t) and w 2 (t) grows exponentially in t. If K < 0 everywhere, then geodesic flow is chaotic: small changes in initial direction lead to very big changes after long time. It is ergodic: almost all trajectories become uniformly distributed. Weather prediction is difficult since the dynamical systems arising there are chaotic! Positive curvature: If K > 0 everywhere, the light rays will focus (like through a lens).

Quantum ergodicity theorem (Shnirelman, Zelditch, Colin de Verdiere): If K < 0 (and the geodesic flow is ergodic), then almost all eigenfunctions of become uniformly distributed. There may be exceptional sequences of eigenfunctions that do not become uniformly distributed ( strong scars ), but these sequences are thin. If all eigenfunctions become uniformly distributed (no exceptions!), then quantum unique ergodicity (or QUE) holds. Example: S 1. Conjecture (Rudnick, Sarnak): QUE holds on negatively-curved manifolds; this includes hyperbolic surfaces. Theorem (Lindenstrauss; Soundararajan, Holowinsky): QUE holds for arithmetic hyperbolic surfaces. Arithmetic hyperbolic surfaces are very symmetric hyperbolic polygons M, coming from very special hyperbolic isometries.

Quantum ergodicity theorem (Shnirelman, Zelditch, Colin de Verdiere): If K < 0 (and the geodesic flow is ergodic), then almost all eigenfunctions of become uniformly distributed. There may be exceptional sequences of eigenfunctions that do not become uniformly distributed ( strong scars ), but these sequences are thin. If all eigenfunctions become uniformly distributed (no exceptions!), then quantum unique ergodicity (or QUE) holds. Example: S 1. Conjecture (Rudnick, Sarnak): QUE holds on negatively-curved manifolds; this includes hyperbolic surfaces. Theorem (Lindenstrauss; Soundararajan, Holowinsky): QUE holds for arithmetic hyperbolic surfaces. Arithmetic hyperbolic surfaces are very symmetric hyperbolic polygons M, coming from very special hyperbolic isometries.

Quantum ergodicity theorem (Shnirelman, Zelditch, Colin de Verdiere): If K < 0 (and the geodesic flow is ergodic), then almost all eigenfunctions of become uniformly distributed. There may be exceptional sequences of eigenfunctions that do not become uniformly distributed ( strong scars ), but these sequences are thin. If all eigenfunctions become uniformly distributed (no exceptions!), then quantum unique ergodicity (or QUE) holds. Example: S 1. Conjecture (Rudnick, Sarnak): QUE holds on negatively-curved manifolds; this includes hyperbolic surfaces. Theorem (Lindenstrauss; Soundararajan, Holowinsky): QUE holds for arithmetic hyperbolic surfaces. Arithmetic hyperbolic surfaces are very symmetric hyperbolic polygons M, coming from very special hyperbolic isometries.

Quantum ergodicity theorem (Shnirelman, Zelditch, Colin de Verdiere): If K < 0 (and the geodesic flow is ergodic), then almost all eigenfunctions of become uniformly distributed. There may be exceptional sequences of eigenfunctions that do not become uniformly distributed ( strong scars ), but these sequences are thin. If all eigenfunctions become uniformly distributed (no exceptions!), then quantum unique ergodicity (or QUE) holds. Example: S 1. Conjecture (Rudnick, Sarnak): QUE holds on negatively-curved manifolds; this includes hyperbolic surfaces. Theorem (Lindenstrauss; Soundararajan, Holowinsky): QUE holds for arithmetic hyperbolic surfaces. Arithmetic hyperbolic surfaces are very symmetric hyperbolic polygons M, coming from very special hyperbolic isometries.

Billiards: QE theorem holds for billiards (bounded domains in R 2 ); proved by Gerard-Leichtnam, Zelditch-Zworski. Geodesic flow is replaced by the billiard flow: move along straight line until the boundary; at the boundary, angle of incidence equals angle of reflection.

Ergodic planar billiards: Sinai billiard and Bunimovich stadium

Ergodic eigenfunction on a cardioid billiard.

Ergodic eigenfunction on the stadium billiard:

Theorem (Hassell): QUE conjecture does not hold for the (Bunimovich) stadium billiard. Exceptions: bouncing ball eigenfunctions, (they have density 0 among all eigenfunctions, so QE still holds).

Nodal set N (φ λ ) = {x M : φ λ (x) = 0}, codimension 1 is M. On a surface, it s a union of curves. First pictures: Chladni plates. E. Chladni, 18th century. He put sand on a plate and played with a violin bow to make it vibrate.

Chladni patterns are still used to tune violins.

Rudnick showed that if certain complex-valued eigenfunctions become equidistributed on hyperbolic surfaces (as in QE), then the same holds for their nodal sets (which are points). The question about nodal sets of real-valued eigenfunctions (lines) is more difficult, and is unsolved. We end with a movie showing nodal sets.