Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics University of Minnesota Written Preliminary Examination: Control Systems Friday, April 9, 2010

Similar documents
Mech 6091 Flight Control System Course Project. Team Member: Bai, Jing Cui, Yi Wang, Xiaoli

CHAPTER 1. Introduction

A SIMPLIFIED ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS AND CONCEPTUAL CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN

Problem 1: Ship Path-Following Control System (35%)

MAE 143B - Homework 9

EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators.

Control Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch Emilio Frazzoli

Chapter 9. Nonlinear Design Models. Beard & McLain, Small Unmanned Aircraft, Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 9, Slide 1

The Role of Zero Dynamics in Aerospace Systems

Time Response of Linear, Time-Invariant (LTI) Systems Robert Stengel, Aircraft Flight Dynamics MAE 331, 2018

Applications Linear Control Design Techniques in Aircraft Control I

Stability of CL System

Confidence metrics analysis of a fixed-wing UAV. Janos Polgar

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design

MAE 142 Homework #5 Due Friday, March 13, 2009

Today (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10

Adaptive Output Feedback Control of the NASA GTM Model with Unknown Nonminimum-Phase Zeros

AFRL MACCCS Review. Adaptive Control of the Generic Hypersonic Vehicle

Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall 2007

First-Order Low-Pass Filter

(a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: G(s) =


CDS 101/110a: Lecture 10-2 Control Systems Implementation

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries

Fault-Tolerant Flight Control Using One Aerodynamic Control Surface

Flight Controller Design for an Autonomous MAV

Localizer Hold Autopilot

Frequency Domain System Identification for a Small, Low-Cost, Fixed-Wing UAV

Topic # Feedback Control. State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback

Squaring-Up Method for Relative Degree Two Plants

Longitudinal Flight Control Systems

6th USA/Europe ATM 2005 R&D Seminar Statistical performance evaluation between linear and nonlinear designs for aircraft relative guidance

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 10-1 Robust Performance

FLIGHT DYNAMICS NEW STYLE EXAMINATION

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems

Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014

An introduction to flight control algorithms. Gertjan Looye 6SX%RQIVOYRKIRZSR71SRXIRIKVS

DERIVATIVE FREE OUTPUT FEEDBACK ADAPTIVE CONTROL

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems

ECSE 4962 Control Systems Design. A Brief Tutorial on Control Design

D(s) G(s) A control system design definition

State Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules

ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques

AE Stability and Control of Aerospace Vehicles

MECH 6091 Flight Control Systems Final Course Project

Mechatronics Assignment # 1

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 1

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 7 Solution April 17, K(s + 0.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =

Positioning Servo Design Example

Richiami di Controlli Automatici

Linear Control Systems Lecture #3 - Frequency Domain Analysis. Guillaume Drion Academic year

CHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES

Wind Turbine Control

Topic # Feedback Control

Aim. Unit abstract. Learning outcomes. QCF level: 6 Credit value: 15

Alireza Mousavi Brunel University

LONGITUDINAL STABILITY AUGMENTATION DESIGN WITH TWO DEGREE OF FREEDOM CONTROL STRUCTURE AND HANDLING QUALITIES REQUIREMENTS

K(s +2) s +20 K (s + 10)(s +1) 2. (c) KG(s) = K(s + 10)(s +1) (s + 100)(s +5) 3. Solution : (a) KG(s) = s +20 = K s s

Exam - TTK 4190 Guidance & Control Eksamen - TTK 4190 Fartøysstyring

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Topic # Feedback Control Systems

100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =

(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:

Linear Flight Control Techniques for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Stochastic and Adaptive Optimal Control

Performance of Disturbance Augmented Control Design in Turbulent Wind Conditions

Classify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.

CHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION

Autopilot design for small fixed wing aerial vehicles. Randy Beard Brigham Young University

Chapter 9 Robust Stability in SISO Systems 9. Introduction There are many reasons to use feedback control. As we have seen earlier, with the help of a

FAULT DETECTION AND FAULT TOLERANT APPROACHES WITH AIRCRAFT APPLICATION. Andrés Marcos

Robustness Analysis and Optimally Robust Control Design via Sum-of-Squares

Control Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling and Linearization. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch Jacopo Tani

Flight Dynamics and Control. Lecture 3: Longitudinal stability Derivatives G. Dimitriadis University of Liege

Adaptive Control of Hypersonic Vehicles in Presence of Aerodynamic and Center of Gravity Uncertainties

Digital Control Systems

x(t) = x(t h), x(t) 2 R ), where is the time delay, the transfer function for such a e s Figure 1: Simple Time Delay Block Diagram e i! =1 \e i!t =!

Two-Point Boundary Value Problem and Optimal Feedback Control based on Differential Algebra

Nyquist Stability Criteria

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 6 Solution April 17, (s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/20) + 1]

Control System Design

Alternative Expressions for the Velocity Vector Velocity restricted to the vertical plane. Longitudinal Equations of Motion

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad

16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2

DISTURBANCES MONITORING FROM CONTROLLER STATES

Fundamentals of Airplane Flight Mechanics

VN-100 Velocity Compensation

Robot Dynamics Fixed Wing UAS: Control and Solar UAS

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 8 Solution December 11,

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

Mechatronics Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems Case-Study Exercise

Detection and Estimation of Icing in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles using a Bank of Unknown Input Observers

Development and Design of the Landing Guidance and Control System for the S20 UAV

R. Balan. Splaiul Independentei 313, Bucharest, ROMANIA D. Aur

Transcription:

Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics University of Minnesota Written Preliminary Examination: Control Systems Friday, April 9, 2010 Problem 1: Control of Short Period Dynamics Consider the following linear model for the short-period dynamics of an aircraft: [ ] [ ] 3 1 0 ẋ = x + δ 50 5 65 e where x := [ Angle of Attack α (rad), Pitch Rate q (rad/sec) ] T and δ e is the elevator deflection (rad). Show that the transfer function from δ e to α is based on the state-space equations. G(s) = 65 s 2 + 8s + 65

Problem 1a: Bode Plot Sketch the Bode plot for G. 10 2 10 1 Magnitude 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 Frequency (rad/sec) 180 90 0 Phase (deg) 90 180 270 360 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 Frequency (rad/sec) Figure 1: Bode Plot

Problem 1b: PD Control Design Consider the feedback loop in the figure shown below. Design a Proportional-Derivative control law, K(s) = k d s+k p so that the closed loop meets the following requirements: State state error due to a unit step command α cmd is 0.1. Closed loop poles have damping 0.7 d α cmd e K(s) u G(s) α Figure 2: α Tracking Feedback Loop

Problem 1c: Step Response Sketch the response of α due to a unit step command for the feedback system with the controller designed in part b.

Problem 1d: Bending Mode Suppose that the aircraft has a bending mode that was neglected during the control design. A model of the aircraft with the bending mode is G b (s) := G(s)H(s) where G(s) was given in part a and the bending mode is modeled as: H(s) := 100 2 s 2 + 2s + 100 2 Sketch a Bode plot for the loop transfer function G b (s)k(s) using the controller designed in part b. What is the impact of the bending mode? How would you design a controller (not necessarily a PD controller) to meet the design specifications in part b and also address any issues that arise due to this bending mode? You don t need to perform a detailed design. You only need to describe the steps you would pursue in redesigning the controller. 10 2 10 1 Magnitude 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 Frequency (rad/sec) 180 90 0 Phase (deg) 90 180 270 360 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 Frequency (rad/sec) Figure 3: Bode Plot

Problem 1e: Sensor Noise Let s return to the aircraft model without the bending mode, G(s), and consider the feedback loop below with additional input n to model noise in the α sensor. K(s) is the PD control law designed in part b. Compute the transfer function from AOA sensor noise to elevator command. Suppose alpha signal is very noisy. 1. How would you redesign the control law to deal with the sensor noise? 2. Suppose you had the option of using a pitch rate sensor in addition to the α sensor. What control architectures might you consider to use both sensors? 3. What factors would impact your choice between the design options in 1) and 2)? d α cmd e K(s) u G(s) α n Figure 4: α Tracking Feedback Loop with Sensor Noise

Problem 2: Linearization Level flight trajectories of a conventional aircraft in the horizontal plane can be reasonably described by the following four-state two-control nonlinear dynamic model V = u 1 βv 2 w 1 (1) Ψ = g V u 2 + w 2 (2) ẋ = V sin Ψ + w 3 (3) ẏ = V cos Ψ + w 4 (4) where V is the normalized airspeed, Ψ is the heading angle measured clockwise from the North, (x,y) are (East, North) coordinates, (u 1,u 2 ) correspond to thrust and bank angle, and w k s are disturbances. For convenience, it is assumed that β = 0.1. The state and control variables in vector forms are x = V Ψ x y, u = [ u1 u 2 ] (5) Determine the trim conditions of the system around the nominal conditions of V 0 = 1,Ψ 0 = 90 o. Linearize this set of equations around the trim trajectory of x(t) = t,y(t) = 0 assuming w k = 0. This trim trajectory corresponds to V 0 = 1,Ψ 0 = 90 o. Call linearized states and controls as δv,δψ,δx,δy,δu 1,δu 2, where δv = V V 0, etc. Express the linearized system in a state-space form and determines the corresponding A and B matrices. Assuming [δx,δy] is the output vector, obtain the C and D matrices.

Problem 3. Linear System as a Predictive Model We are now going to use the above linearized system model as the basis to predict future system behaviors. In particular in using the linear system to predict future states, the initial state values are estimated from measurements and in general contain errors δx 0 = δˆx 0 + z 0 = δ ˆV δ ˆΨ δˆx δŷ + z V z Ψ z x z y (7) This error z 0 can affect the model s ability to accurately predict the future behavior of the aircraft. Analyze the sensitivity of the predicted linearized system response δx(t) with respect to initial state errors z 0 δx(t) z 0 In this analysis, let s assume that both disturbances and controls are zero. What is the effect of an initial airspeed error (z V ) on the future position along the East δx(t)? What is the effect of an initial heading error (z Ψ ) on the future position along the East δx(t)?