p 1 ( Y p dp) 1/p ( X p dp) 1 1 p

Similar documents
Stochastic Calculus February 11, / 33

Mathematical Methods for Neurosciences. ENS - Master MVA Paris 6 - Master Maths-Bio ( )

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

Stochastic Differential Equations.

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

Brownian Motion. 1 Definition Brownian Motion Wiener measure... 3

Poisson Jumps in Credit Risk Modeling: a Partial Integro-differential Equation Formulation

Exercises. T 2T. e ita φ(t)dt.

A Short Introduction to Diffusion Processes and Ito Calculus

Kolmogorov Equations and Markov Processes

I forgot to mention last time: in the Ito formula for two standard processes, putting

MA8109 Stochastic Processes in Systems Theory Autumn 2013

Bernardo D Auria Stochastic Processes /10. Notes. Abril 13 th, 2010

1. Stochastic Processes and filtrations

Lecture 4: Introduction to stochastic processes and stochastic calculus

{σ x >t}p x. (σ x >t)=e at.

The concentration of a drug in blood. Exponential decay. Different realizations. Exponential decay with noise. dc(t) dt.

LAN property for sde s with additive fractional noise and continuous time observation

Reflected Brownian Motion

Verona Course April Lecture 1. Review of probability

Homogenization with stochastic differential equations

Properties of an infinite dimensional EDS system : the Muller s ratchet

2012 NCTS Workshop on Dynamical Systems

Introduction to Random Diffusions

Stochastic Integration.

Convoluted Brownian motions: a class of remarkable Gaussian processes

Applications of Ito s Formula

6. Brownian Motion. Q(A) = P [ ω : x(, ω) A )

An adaptive numerical scheme for fractional differential equations with explosions

TMS165/MSA350 Stochastic Calculus, Lecture on Applications

Local vs. Nonlocal Diffusions A Tale of Two Laplacians

Solution for Problem 7.1. We argue by contradiction. If the limit were not infinite, then since τ M (ω) is nondecreasing we would have

Bernardo D Auria Stochastic Processes /12. Notes. March 29 th, 2012

Intertwinings for Markov processes

13 The martingale problem

Birth and Death Processes. Birth and Death Processes. Linear Growth with Immigration. Limiting Behaviour for Birth and Death Processes

Exercises in stochastic analysis

Brownian Motion and the Dirichlet Problem

Lecture 12: Detailed balance and Eigenfunction methods

Lecture 3. This operator commutes with translations and it is not hard to evaluate. Ae iξx = ψ(ξ)e iξx. T t I. A = lim

Path integrals for classical Markov processes

An Introduction to Malliavin calculus and its applications

Partial Differential Equations with Applications to Finance Seminar 1: Proving and applying Dynkin s formula

A Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation: entropies and convergence to equilibrium

BROWNIAN MOTION AND LIOUVILLE S THEOREM

Lecture 12: Detailed balance and Eigenfunction methods

Brownian motion. Samy Tindel. Purdue University. Probability Theory 2 - MA 539

The Smoluchowski-Kramers Approximation: What model describes a Brownian particle?

Brownian Motion on Manifold

Jump Processes. Richard F. Bass

Gaussian processes for inference in stochastic differential equations

Weak convergence and large deviation theory

1. Stochastic Process

The multidimensional Ito Integral and the multidimensional Ito Formula. Eric Mu ller June 1, 2015 Seminar on Stochastic Geometry and its applications

LAN property for ergodic jump-diffusion processes with discrete observations

Branching Processes II: Convergence of critical branching to Feller s CSB

4.6 Example of non-uniqueness.

Starting from Heat Equation

Solutions to the Exercises in Stochastic Analysis

Kolmogorov equations in Hilbert spaces IV

Theoretical Tutorial Session 2

Stability of Stochastic Differential Equations

Simulation of conditional diffusions via forward-reverse stochastic representations

Potential theory of subordinate killed Brownian motions

The Wiener Itô Chaos Expansion

Simulation methods for stochastic models in chemistry

Week 9 Generators, duality, change of measure

HJB equations. Seminar in Stochastic Modelling in Economics and Finance January 10, 2011

Problem 1. Construct a filtered probability space on which a Brownian motion W and an adapted process X are defined and such that

Lecture 12. F o s, (1.1) F t := s>t

Lower Tail Probabilities and Normal Comparison Inequalities. In Memory of Wenbo V. Li s Contributions

Convergence of Markov Processes. Amanda Turner University of Cambridge

Albert N. Shiryaev Steklov Mathematical Institute. On sharp maximal inequalities for stochastic processes

MSH7 - APPLIED PROBABILITY AND STOCHASTIC CALCULUS. Contents

Discretization of SDEs: Euler Methods and Beyond

Stochastic Differential Equations

Optimal Stopping and Maximal Inequalities for Poisson Processes

A new approach for investment performance measurement. 3rd WCMF, Santa Barbara November 2009

Model Specification Testing in Nonparametric and Semiparametric Time Series Econometrics. Jiti Gao

Mean-field SDE driven by a fractional BM. A related stochastic control problem

Densities for the Navier Stokes equations with noise

A Concise Course on Stochastic Partial Differential Equations

Lecture 4: Ito s Stochastic Calculus and SDE. Seung Yeal Ha Dept of Mathematical Sciences Seoul National University

Linear Ordinary Differential Equations

Nonlinear representation, backward SDEs, and application to the Principal-Agent problem

Some Tools From Stochastic Analysis

Infinite-dimensional methods for path-dependent equations

Feller Processes and Semigroups

SMSTC (2007/08) Probability.

Sloppy derivations of Ito s formula and the Fokker-Planck equations

Smoluchowski Diffusion Equation

Generalized Gaussian Bridges of Prediction-Invertible Processes

WEYL S LEMMA, ONE OF MANY. Daniel W. Stroock

SDE Coefficients. March 4, 2008

Approximation of BSDEs using least-squares regression and Malliavin weights

1 Brownian Local Time

Selected Exercises on Expectations and Some Probability Inequalities

Markov processes and queueing networks

The Chaotic Character of the Stochastic Heat Equation

lim n C1/n n := ρ. [f(y) f(x)], y x =1 [f(x) f(y)] [g(x) g(y)]. (x,y) E A E(f, f),

Transcription:

Doob s inequality Let X(t) be a right continuous submartingale with respect to F(t), t 1 P(sup s t X(s) λ) 1 λ {sup s t X(s) λ} X + (t)dp 2 For 1 < p <, E[sup s t X(s) p ] ( p p 1) p E[ X(t) p ] 1 2: P(λ) = P( X λ), X = sup s t X(s), Y = X(t), p E[ X p ] = = p p 1 λ p dp(λ) = p λ p 1 P(λ)dλ λ p 1 ( 1 X YdP)dλ = p Y λ p 2 dλdp λ X>λ Y X p 1 dp p p 1 ( Y p dp) 1/p ( X p dp) 1 1 p () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 1 / 22

Existence and Uniqueness Theorem σ : R d [, T ] R d d, b : R d [, T ] R d be Borel measurable, A <, σ(x, t) + b(x, t) A(1 + x ) x R d, t T and Lipschitz; σ(x, t) σ(y, t) + b(x, t) b(y, t) A x y. x R d indep of B t, E[ x 2 ] <. Then there exists a unique solution X t on [, T ] to and E[ T X t 2 dt] <. dx t = b(x t, t)dt + σ(x t, t)db t, X = x Uniqueness means that if Xt 1 and Xt 2 are two solutions then P(Xt 1 = Xt 2, t T ) = 1 () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 2 / 22

dx t = σ(t, X t )db t + b(t, X t )dt t f (t, X t ) = f (, X ) + Lf (t, x) = 1 2 t + i,j=1 i,j=1 { } s f (s, X s ) + Lf (s, X s ) ds σ ij (s, X s ) x i f (s, X s )db j s a ij (t, x) 2 f x i x j (t, x) + i=1 b i (t, x) f x i (t, x) a ij = σ ik σ jk k=1 a = σσ T () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 3 / 22

Markov property X t can be obtained by solving the stochastic differential equation up to time s < t and then solving in [s, t] with initial condition X s By uniqueness this gives the same answer Define the transition probability p(s, x, t, A) = P(X s,x t A) where X s,x t is the solution starting at x at time s From the construction we have P(X,x t A F s ) = p(s, X,x s, t, A) which is the Markov property () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 4 / 22

Diffusions A diffusion is a Markov process with transition probabilities p(s, x, t, dy) satisfying, for each δ > as h, 1 i. p(t, x, t + h, dy) continuous paths h y x δ 1 ii. (y x)p(t, x, t + h, dy) b(t, x) h y x <δ 1 iii. (y i x i )(y j x j )p(t, x,, t + h, dy) a ij (t, x) h y x <δ () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 5 / 22

t { } t f (t, X t ) f (, X ) s + L f (s, X s )ds = f (s, X s ) σdb s L = 1 2 2 a ij (t, x) + x i x j i,j=1 M t = f (t, X t ) t { } s + L i=1 b i (t, x) x i = generator f (s, X s )ds is a martingale t { } = E[f (t, X t ) f (s, X s ) u + L f (u, X u )du F s ] s = f (t, y)p(s, x, t, y)dy f (s, x) t { u + L} f (u, y)p(s, x, u, y)dydu, s X s = x () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 6 / 22

For any f, = f (t, y)p(s, x, t, y)dy f (s, x) t { u + L} f (u, y)p(s, x, u, y)dydu s Fokker-Planck (Forward) Equation t p(s, x, t, y) = 1 2 i,j=1 i=1 = L yp(s, x, t, y) 2 y i y j (a i,j (t, y)p(s, x, t, y)) y i (b i (t, y)p(s, x, t, y)) lim p(s, x, t, y) = δ(y x). t s () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 7 / 22

Kolmogorov (Backward) Equation s p(s, x, t, y) = 1 2 + i,j=1 i=1 = L x p(s, x, t, y) a ij (s, x) 2 p(s, x, t, y) x i x j p(s, x, t, y) b i (s, x) x i lim p(s, x, t, y) = δ(y x). s t () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 8 / 22

Example. Brownian motion d = 1 2 L = 1 2 x 2 Forward p(s, x, t, y t = 1 2 p(s, x, t, y) 2 y 2, t > s p(s, x, s, y) = δ(y x) Backward p(s, x, t, y s = 1 2 p(s, x, t, y) 2 x 2, s < t, p(t, x, t, y) = δ(y x) () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 9 / 22

Example. Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Process L = σ2 2 2 x 2 αx x Forward p(s, x, t, y t = 1 2 p(s, x, t, y) 2 y 2 + (αyp(s, x, t, y), t > s, y p(s, x, s, y) = δ(y x) Backward p(s, x, t, y s = 1 2 p(s, x, t, y) 2 x 2 αx p(s, x, t, y), s < t, x p(t, x, t, y) = δ(y x) () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 1 / 22

Formal derivation of the backward equation p(s, x, t, A) = p(s, x, s + h, dy)p(s + h, y, t, A) = { } p(s, x, s + h, dy) p(s + h, y, t, A) p(s, x, t, A) = { p(s, x, t, A) p(s, x, s + h, dy) h + s + 1 2 p(s, x, t, A) (y i x i ) x i i=1 (y i x i )(y j x j ) 2 p(s, x, t, A) } + x i x j i,j=1 p(s, x, t, A) = s i=1 p(s, x, t, A) b i (t, x) + 1 x i 2 i,j=1 a ij (t, x) 2 p(s, x, t, A) x i x j () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 11 / 22

Real derivation f (x) smooth s u = L su s < t u(t, x) = f (x) Ito s formula: u(s, X(s)) martingale up to time t u(s, x) = E s,x [u(s, X(s))] = E s,x [u(t, X(t))] = f (z)p(s, x, t, dz) Let f n (z) smooth functions tending to δ(y z) u(s, x) = p(s, x, t, y) if s u = L su s < t u(t, x) = δ(x y) () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 12 / 22

Existence result from PDE Suppose that a(t, x) and b(t, x) are bounded and that there are α >, γ (, 1], C < such that for all s, t, x, y R d, i. ξ T a(t, x)ξ α ξ 2, ξ R d, ii. a(s, x) a(t, y) + b(s, x) b(t, y) C( x y γ + t s γ ). Then the backward equation has a solution and furthermore p(s, x, t, A) = p(s, x, t, y)dy with p(s, x, t, y) jointly continuous in s, x, t, y. Furthermore, p(s, x, t, y) is the unique weak solution of the forward equation,i.e. f (t, y)p(s, x, t, y)dy f (s, x) = A t s { u + L } f (u, y)p(s, x, u, y)dydu () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 13 / 22

The solution X t, t of dx t = b(x t )dt + σ(x t )db t with X = x is a Markov process with infinitesimal generator Itô s formula L = 1 2 2 a ij (x) + x i x j i,j=1 f (t, X t ) = f (, X ) + t + i,j=1 t i=1 b i (x) x i, a = σσ. { } s f (s, X s ) + Lf (s, X s ) ds σ ij (s, X s ) x i f (s, X s )db j s () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 14 / 22

Under the previous conditions, the following are equivalent 1 B t, t, dx t = b(t, X t )dt + σ(t, X t )db t 2 For each λ R d, Z λ (t) = e λ{x t R t b(s,xs)ds} 1 R t 2 λt a(s,x s)λds is a martingale with respect to F t 3 For all smooth f (t, x), f (t, X t ) t is a martingale with respect to F t 4 For all smooth f (x), { s + L}f (s, X s )ds t f (X t ) Lf (X s )ds is a martingale with respect to F t () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 15 / 22

Brownian motion in R d 1 B t = (Bt 1,..., Bd t ), Bi t independent Brownian motions 2 B t Markov with P(B t A B s = x) = A 1 e y x 2 (2π(t s)) d/2 2(t s) dy 3 B t has stationary independent mean zero increments with E[ B t B s 2 ] = d(t s) 4 e λ B t 1 2 λ 2t is a martingale for any λ Note that 1 does not depend on the basis: If Bt 1,..., B2 t independent and O is orthogonal, then the coordinates of OB t are independent Brownian motions in fact Theorem Suppose X 1, X 2 independent and θ Nπ/2 such that X 1 cos θ + X 2 sin θ, X 1 sin θ + X 2 cos θ independent Then X 1, X 2 are Gaussians (Maxwell) () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 16 / 22

Dirichlet problem Given a bounded open subset G R d and a continuous function f : G R find a continuous function u : Ḡ R such that { u = in G u G = f u def = i=1 2 u x 2 i = 2d lim r r 2 ( 1 S(r, x) S(r,x) uds u(x) ) Lemma u harmonic in G u satisfies the mean value property: for all sufficiently small r >, 1 uds = u(x) S(r, x) S(r,x) () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 17 / 22

Lemma u harmonic in G u satisfies the mean value property: for all sufficiently small r >, 1 uds = u(x) S(r, x) S(r,x) Proof. Green s identity G v udx = G u vdx + { G v u n u v n log r log x log r log δ d = 2 G = {δ < x < r}, v = x 2 d r 2 d d > 2 δ 2 d r 2 d let ρ ds () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 18 / 22

B t d-dimensional Brownian motion starting at x G τ G = inf{t : B(t) G} u(x) = E x [f (B(τ G ))] Theorem If G nice then u solves the Dirichlet problem E x [f (B(τ G ))] = G f (y)π G (x, dy), π G (x, Γ) = P x (B(τ G ) Γ), Γ G Example. G = B(x, r), π G (x, Γ) = Γ, Γ S(x, r) S(x,r) Brownian motion is invariant under rotations π G (x, ) is invariant under rotations () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 19 / 22

Proposition G bounded open R d, f bounded measurable on G. Then u(x) = E x [f (B(τ G ))] is harmonic in G. Proof. B = B(x, r) G τ B τ G Strong Markov property: u(b(τ S )) = E x [f (B(τ G )) F τs ] u(x) = E x [f (B(τ G ))] = E x [E x [f (B(τ G )) F τs ]] So u satisfies the mean value property in G. = E x [u(b(τ S ))] = u(y)π S (x, dy) = S 1 S u(y)ds () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 2 / 22 S

a G To complete the proof that u solves the Dirichlet problem we need Proposition lim E x[f (B(τ G ))] = f (a) x a, x G It is not always true! If lim x a P x [τ G > ɛ] =, ɛ > then for any bdd mble function x G f : G R which is continuous at a, lim x a E x [f (B(τ G ))] = f (a) x G Proof. Need: lim x a, x G P x ( B(τ G ) x < δ) = 1 P x ( B(τ G ) x < δ) P x ( sup B(t) x < δ, τ G ɛ) t ɛ P x ( sup B(t) x < δ) P x (τ G ɛ) t ɛ 1 as x a, x G then ɛ () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 21 / 22

Proposition a G is regular if P a (σ G = ) = 1 σ G = inf{t > : B(t) G} a regular lim x a, x G E x [f (B τg )] = f (a) f bdd mble, cont at a Proof of Enough to prove P x (σ G < ɛ) lower semi-continuous in x Then lim sup x a P x (σ G < ɛ) P a (σ G < ɛ) = 1 and σ G τ G x G But p(, x, δ, y)p y ( s (, ɛ δ), B(s) G) continuous and P x (σ G < ɛ) as δ Examples 1 If G is a smooth manifold near a then a is regular by LIL 2 If cone C of height h > and vertex at a such that C {a} ḠC then a is a regular (exterior cone condition) 3 d 2 always,d 3 counterexamples () Stochastic Calculus March 4, 29 22 / 22