Angular momentum operator algebra

Similar documents
Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics

Lecture 11 Spin, orbital, and total angular momentum Mechanics. 1 Very brief background. 2 General properties of angular momentum operators

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

Mathematical Formulation of the Superposition Principle

Adding angular momenta

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 14 Coupling of Angular Momenta

The quantum state as a vector

DS-GA 1002 Lecture notes 0 Fall Linear Algebra. These notes provide a review of basic concepts in linear algebra.

II. The Machinery of Quantum Mechanics

Page 52. Lecture 3: Inner Product Spaces Dual Spaces, Dirac Notation, and Adjoints Date Revised: 2008/10/03 Date Given: 2008/10/03

The Simple Harmonic Oscillator

Representations of angular momentum

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Fall Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 5, January 27, 2006

Group representation theory and quantum physics

Addition of Angular Momenta

1. Rotations in 3D, so(3), and su(2). * version 2.0 *

In this lecture we will go through the method of coupling of angular momentum.

Quantum Mechanics I Physics 5701

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

Quantization of the Spins

,, rectilinear,, spherical,, cylindrical. (6.1)

QM and Angular Momentum

Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

Coordinate and Momentum Representation. Commuting Observables and Simultaneous Measurements. January 30, 2012

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws

Page 404. Lecture 22: Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 2008/11/19 Date Revised: 2008/11/19

Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Mathematical Introduction

Linear Algebra in Hilbert Space

Review of Linear Algebra

Lecture notes on Quantum Computing. Chapter 1 Mathematical Background

SCE3337 Quantum Mechanics III (Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Optics) Teaching Team

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND TYPOS (send to

Econ Slides from Lecture 7

An operator is a transformation that takes a function as an input and produces another function (usually).

Vector Spaces for Quantum Mechanics J. P. Leahy January 30, 2012

2 The Density Operator

1. What is the determinant of the following matrix? a 1 a 2 4a 3 2a 2 b 1 b 2 4b 3 2b c 1. = 4, then det

Recitation 1 (Sep. 15, 2017)

MIT Final Exam Solutions, Spring 2017

Incompatibility Paradoxes

PY 351 Modern Physics - Lecture notes, 3

This is the important completeness relation,

Degenerate Perturbation Theory. 1 General framework and strategy

Isotropic harmonic oscillator

1 Mathematical preliminaries

Homework 2. Solutions T =

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2004 Assignment 3

4.3 Lecture 18: Quantum Mechanics

C/CS/Phys C191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell 10/06/07 Fall 2009 Lecture 12

J = L + S. to this ket and normalize it. In this way we get expressions for all the kets

Quantum Mechanics crash course (For the scholar with an higher education in mathematics) Fabio Grazioso :48

Consistent Histories. Chapter Chain Operators and Weights

B553 Lecture 5: Matrix Algebra Review

Chapter 3 Transformations

Implications of Time-Reversal Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics

Vector Spaces. Vector space, ν, over the field of complex numbers, C, is a set of elements a, b,..., satisfying the following axioms.

Linear Algebra II. 2 Matrices. Notes 2 21st October Matrix algebra

Foundations of Matrix Analysis

All of my class notes can be found at

If you like us, please share us on social media. The latest UCD Hyperlibrary newsletter is now complete, check it out.

Non-Abelian Symmetries in the Numerical Renormalization Group

in terms of the classical frequency, ω = , puts the classical Hamiltonian in the form H = p2 2m + mω2 x 2

Vector Spaces in Quantum Mechanics

MTH 2032 SemesterII

Relationship of the commutation rules to classical-like representations of quantum angular momenta addition

University of Colorado at Denver Mathematics Department Applied Linear Algebra Preliminary Exam With Solutions 16 January 2009, 10:00 am 2:00 pm

Family Feud Review. Linear Algebra. October 22, 2013

Basic Quantum Mechanics Prof. Ajoy Ghatak Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

Are these states normalized? A) Yes

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. D(g 1 g 2 ) = D(g 1 )D(g 2 ), g 1, g 2 G. and, as a consequence, (2) (3)

Quantum Mechanics- I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

A Short Course on Frame Theory

Lecture 12. The harmonic oscillator

The Framework of Quantum Mechanics

Chapter 2. Linear Algebra. rather simple and learning them will eventually allow us to explain the strange results of

Fundamentals of Linear Algebra. Marcel B. Finan Arkansas Tech University c All Rights Reserved

Quantum Mechanics - I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Existence of Antiparticles as an Indication of Finiteness of Nature. Felix M. Lev

Linear Operators, Eigenvalues, and Green s Operator

Math Camp Lecture 4: Linear Algebra. Xiao Yu Wang. Aug 2010 MIT. Xiao Yu Wang (MIT) Math Camp /10 1 / 88

Elementary Linear Algebra

Linear Algebra Review. Vectors

Mathematical Methods wk 1: Vectors

Mathematical Methods wk 1: Vectors

2-7 Solving Absolute-Value Inequalities

Supplementary Notes on Linear Algebra

Physics 342 Lecture 2. Linear Algebra I. Lecture 2. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I

What is A + B? What is A B? What is AB? What is BA? What is A 2? and B = QUESTION 2. What is the reduced row echelon matrix of A =

Lecture If two operators A, B commute then they have same set of eigenkets.

Recall the convention that, for us, all vectors are column vectors.

Vectors in Function Spaces

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENVECTORS 3

Jim Lambers MAT 610 Summer Session Lecture 1 Notes

Hilbert Spaces. Hilbert space is a vector space with some extra structure. We start with formal (axiomatic) definition of a vector space.

MATH 583A REVIEW SESSION #1

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

Numerical Linear Algebra

A = 3 1. We conclude that the algebraic multiplicity of the eigenvalues are both one, that is,

Transcription:

Lecture 14 Angular momentum operator algebra In this lecture we present the theory of angular momentum operator algebra in quantum mechanics. 14.1 Basic relations Consider the three Hermitian angular momentum operators Ĵx, Ĵy and Ĵz, which satisfy the commutation relations ] [Ĵx, Ĵy = i Ĵ z, ] [Ĵz, Ĵx = i Ĵ y, ] [Ĵy, Ĵz = i Ĵ x. (14.1 The operator Ĵ 2 = Ĵ 2 x + Ĵ 2 y + Ĵ 2 z, (14.2 is also Hermitian and it commutes with Ĵx, Ĵy and Ĵz: [Ĵ ] [Ĵ ] [Ĵ ] 2, Ĵx = 2, Ĵy = 2, Ĵz = 0. (14.3 These relations are not difficult to prove using the operator identity [Â, ˆBĈ ] = [ Â, ˆB ] Ĉ + ˆB [ Â, Ĉ]. (14.4 1

2 LECTURE 14. ANGULAR MOMENTUM OPERATOR ALGEBRA For example, [Ĵ ] [Ĵ 2, Ĵz = 2 x + Ĵ y 2 + Ĵ z 2, Ĵz] = [ Ĵ 2 x, Ĵz] + [Ĵ 2 y, Ĵz], (14.5 because by definition Ĵz commutes with itself and, using (14.4, [Ĵ ] ] 2 z, Ĵz = [Ĵz, ]Ĵz Ĵz [Ĵz Ĵz, Ĵz = 0. (14.6 The remaining two commutators in the last row of (14.5 can be calculated using again (14.4: and [Ĵ ] 2 x, Ĵz = [Ĵx, ]Ĵx Ĵz + [Ĵx Ĵx, Ĵz] = i (Ĵy Ĵ x + ĴxĴy, (14.7 [Ĵ ] 2 y, Ĵz = [Ĵy, ]Ĵy Ĵz + [Ĵy Ĵy, Ĵz] = i (Ĵx Ĵ y + ĴyĴx. (14.8 The sum of [ Ĵx, Ĵz] [Ĵ 2 and 2 y, Ĵz] is therefore zero and from (14.5 it follows that [ Ĵ 2, Ĵz] = 0. Rather then working with the Hermitian operators Ĵx and Ĵy, it is more convenient to work with the non-hermitian linear combinations, Ĵ + = Ĵx + iĵy, Ĵ = Ĵx iĵy, (14.9a (14.9b where, by definition, (Ĵ = Ĵ+. For reasons that will become clear later, Ĵ + and Ĵ are called ladder operators. Using (14.1 and (14.3, it is straight-

14.1. BASIC RELATIONS 3 forward to show that ] [Ĵz, Ĵ+ = Ĵ +, (14.10a ] [Ĵz, Ĵ = Ĵ, (14.10b ] [Ĵ+, Ĵ = 2 Ĵ z, (14.10c [Ĵ ] [Ĵ ] 2, Ĵ+ = 2, Ĵ = 0. (14.10d The operators Ĵ+ and Ĵ often appear in the products Ĵ+Ĵ and Ĵ Ĵ+, which are equal to Ĵ + Ĵ = (Ĵx + iĵy (Ĵx iĵy = Ĵ x 2 + Ĵ y 2 i [ ] Ĵ x, Ĵy = Ĵ 2 x + Ĵ 2 y + Ĵz, (14.11 and Ĵ Ĵ + = (Ĵx iĵy (Ĵx + iĵy = Ĵ x 2 + Ĵ y 2 + i [ ] Ĵ x, Ĵy = Ĵ 2 x + Ĵ 2 y Ĵz, (14.12 respectively. After noticing that (14.2 implies Ĵ x 2 + Ĵ y 2 straightforwardly rewrite Ĵ+Ĵ and Ĵ Ĵ+ as Ĵ + Ĵ = Ĵ 2 Ĵ z 2 + Ĵz, Ĵ Ĵ + = Ĵ 2 Ĵ z 2 Ĵz. = Ĵ 2 Ĵ 2 z, we can (14.13a (14.13b Adding equations (14.13 side-by-side and rearranging the terms, we obtain Ĵ 2 = 1 Ĵ + 2 Ĵ Ĵ+ + Ĵ z 2. (14.14

4 LECTURE 14. ANGULAR MOMENTUM OPERATOR ALGEBRA Two additional useful relations are: [Ĵz, ( Ĵ + n ] = n n, [Ĵz, ( Ĵ n ] = n (Ĵ n, (14.15a (14.15b where n = 0, 1, 2,..., is an integer number. We demonstrate, for example, the first relation (14.15a. The proof is by iteration. If n = 0, then 0 = Î and (14.15a becomes a trivial identity. If n = 1, we simply recover (14.10a. If n > 1, we first rewrite Ĵ z n = ĴzĴ+ n 1, (14.16 and then use (14.10a to write ĴzĴ+ = Ĵ+Ĵz + Ĵ+. This permits us to find the following recursion relation: n n 1 Ĵ z = Ĵ z + Ĵ+ = ( n ] n 1 Ĵ + + Ĵ + [Ĵz. (14.17 If we rewrite this equation replacing n with n 1, we easily find Ĵ z n 1 = n 1 + Ĵ + [Ĵz n 2 ]. (14.18 Substituting this expression into (14.17, we obtain Ĵ z n = n + Ĵ + { ( Ĵ + n 1 + Ĵ + [Ĵz n 2 ]} = 2 ( Ĵ + n + 2 [Ĵz n 2 ]. (14.19 This procedure can be iterated again and again. After p iterations we find Ĵ z n = p n + p [Ĵz n p ], (14.20 which becomes, for p = n, Ĵ z n = n n + nĵ z. (14.21

14.2. COMPATIBLE AND INCOMPATIBLE OBSERVABLES 5 This proves (14.15a. Equation (14.15b can be obtained in the same way using (14.10b. Finally, from [ Ĵ 2, Ĵ±] = 0 and the equation 1 [Â, ˆBn ] = [ Â, ˆB ] ˆBn 1 + ˆB [ Â, ˆB ] ˆBn 2 +... + ˆB n 1[ Â, ˆB ], (14.22 where n is a positive integer number, it follows that [Ĵ 2, (Ĵ± n] = 0. (14.23 14.2 Compatible and incompatible observables In quantum mechanics, two observables A and B are said to be compatible when the corresponding operators  and ˆB commute, [Â, ˆB] = 0, (14.24 and incompatible when they do not [Â, ˆB] 0. (14.25 If A and B are compatible and ψ is an eigenvector of  associated with the eigenvalue a,  ψ = a ψ, (14.26 then ˆB ψ is also an eigenvector of  associated with the same eigenvalue a. This can be easily seen applying ˆB to both sides of (14.26: Since, by hypothesis, [ Â, ˆB ] = 0, we can replace equation with  ˆB, thus obtaining (  ˆB ψ Now, there are two possibilities: ˆB ψ = a ˆB ψ. (14.27 1 This equation can be easily proved by induction using (14.4. ˆB on the left side of this ( = a ˆB ψ. (14.28

6 LECTURE 14. ANGULAR MOMENTUM OPERATOR ALGEBRA 1 If a is a non-degenerate eigenvalue, then all vectors ψ satisfying (14.26 are parallel 2 and ˆB ψ is necessarily proportional to ψ, that is ˆB ψ = b ψ. (14.29 Therefore, ψ is also an eigenvector of ˆB. 2 If a is a degenerate eigenvalue, then the set of all vectors ψ satisfying (14.26 spans a subspace E a associated with the eigenvalue a. Then, if ψ E a, all what we can say is that ˆB ψ belongs to E a : ˆB ψ E a. (14.30 In the first case, the knowledge of the common eigenvector ψ of  and ˆB, uniquely determines the values of both a and b. This means that a and b are not independent variables and the knowledge of a fixes the value of b and vice versa. In the second case, instead, we need to specify both values a and b to uniquely identify the common eigenvectors of  and ˆB. A fundamental theorem of quantum mechanics states that 3 : When two observables A and B are compatible, it is always possible to find an orthonormal basis of the vector space spanned by the eigenvectors common to the corresponding operators  and ˆB. We denote with { a, b } such a basis, where the eigenvectors a, b are defined by the properties  a, b = a a, b, ˆB a, b = b a, b, (14.31a (14.31b 2 Here and hereafter, the statement that two vectors ψ and φ are parallel, signifies that ψ = γ φ, where γ is any nonzero complex number. 3 For a demonstration see, e.g., C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Vol. I (Wiley-Vch, 2005, Chapter II, D-3-a.

14.2. COMPATIBLE AND INCOMPATIBLE OBSERVABLES 7 and a, b a, b = δ aa δ bb. (14.32 If the ordered pair of eigenvalues (a, b determine a unique common eigenvector a, b of  and ˆB, then the set of observables {A, B} is called a Complete Set of Commuting Observables (CSCO, or a maximal set of commuting observables; that is there is not a third observable C such that [Â, [Â, ˆB] = Ĉ ] = [ ˆB, Ĉ ] = 0. (14.33 The eigenvalues of operators  and ˆB may still be degenerate, but if we specify a pair (a, b, then the corresponding eigenvector a, b common to  and ˆB is uniquely specified. The Hermitian operator  possess at least one degenerate eigenvalue when there are two observables B and C compatible with A but incompatible each other. To prove this statement, consider three observables A, B and C such that {A, B} is a CSCO, with [Â, ˆB] = 0 = [Â, Ĉ ], and [ ˆB, Ĉ ] 0. (14.34 According to our nomenclature, equations (14.34 imply that A is compatible with both B and C, but B and C are incompatible. Let a, b be a common eigenvector of  and ˆB associated with the eigenvalues a and b, respectively. From [ Â, Ĉ] = 0 it follows that Ĉ a, b is also eigenvectors of  associated with the same eigenvalue a. Therefore, we have ( (  ˆB a, b = a ˆB a, b, (14.35a  (Ĉ a, b = a (Ĉ a, b, (14.35b Suppose that a is a non-degenerate eigenvalue. Then Ĉ a, b must be proportional to ˆB a, b, otherwise according to (14.35 Ĉ a, b and ˆB a, b

8 LECTURE 14. ANGULAR MOMENTUM OPERATOR ALGEBRA would be two different eigenvectors associated with the same eigenvalue a, which is incompatible with the hypothesis that a is a non-degenerate eigenvalue. Therefore, we can write ( Ĉ a, b = γ ˆB a, b = γ b a, b, (14.36 because ˆB a, b = b a, b, and γ is a numerical constant. Multiplying by ˆB both sides of this equation, we obtain: ˆBĈ a, b = γ b ( ˆB a, b = γ b 2 a, b. (14.37 On the other hand, applying Ĉ to both sides of we find ˆB a, b = b a, b, (14.38 Ĉ ˆB a, b = b (Ĉ a, b = γ b 2 a, b, (14.39 where (14.36 has been used. Subtracting (14.39 from (14.37 we obtain [ ˆB, Ĉ ] a, b = 0. (14.40 This equality cannot be true for all the basis vectors { a, b }, because this would imply [ ˆB, Ĉ ] = 0, (14.41 in contradiction to the assumption (14.34. Therefore, the presupposition that the eigenvalue a is non-degenerate cannot be valid for all eigenvalues of the operator Â. This means that  has at least one degenerate eigenvalue. 14.3 Definitions and notation for the eigenvalues of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz From the definition (14.2 it follows that for any ket ψ, the expectation value ψ Ĵ 2 ψ is nonnegative, because ψ Ĵ 2 ψ = ψ Ĵ x ψ 2 + ψ Ĵ y 2 ψ + ψ Ĵ z 2 ψ = Ĵx ψ 2 + Ĵy ψ 2 + Ĵz ψ 2 0, (14.42

14.3. THE EIGENVALUES OF Ĵ 2 AND ĴZ 9 where ψ Ĵ 2 x ψ = ψ Ĵ xĵx ψ = Ĵ x ψ 2, et cetera (remember that Ĵx is Hermitian, therefore ψ Ĵ x = ψ Ĵx. If ψ is an eigenvector of Ĵ 2 associated with the eigenvalue λ 2 (λ is thus dimensionless, then (14.42 implies λ 0. (14.43 It is conventional (but not mandatory to introduce a nonnegative number j 0 defined by λ = j (j + 1. (14.44 For j 0 the function j (j + 1 is positive or null and monotonically increasing, as shown in Fig. 14.1. λ = j( j + 1 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 j Figure 14.1: Graph of the function λ = j (j + 1, for j 0. The vertical gray line mark the value j = ( 5 1/2, which gives λ = 1. Therefore, if necessary, we can invert (14.44 to obtain j = 1 ( 4λ + 1 1. (14.45 2 According to Sec. 14.2, since Ĵ 2 and Ĵz commute, it is possible to find a set of common eigenvectors { j, m }, such that Ĵ 2 j, m = j(j + 1 2 j, m, Ĵ z j, m = m j, m, (14.46a (14.46b

10 LECTURE 14. ANGULAR MOMENTUM OPERATOR ALGEBRA and j, m j, m = δ jj δ mm, (14.47 where the eigenvalue of Ĵz is traditionally written as m, and m is a dimensionless number 4. From inspection of (14.1-14.3, we can easily convince ourselves that using only Ĵx, Ĵy and Ĵz, it is not possible to build an additional (nontrivial Hermitian operator commuting with both Ĵ 2 and Ĵz. Therefore, from the results of Sec. 14.2, it follows that {J 2, J z } is a CSCO. This can be also rigorously demonstrated using group theory, but this is outside the scope of these lectures. In short, in the language of group theory, the set of the three Hermitian operators Ĵx, Ĵy and Ĵz, is closed under commutation, as shown by (14.1. These operators are the generators of a Lie group. Specifically, the commutation relations (14.1 represent the Lie algebra of the SO(3 group. The rank of a Lie group is defined as the largest number of generators commuting with each other. Since none of the operators Ĵx, Ĵy and Ĵz commute with any other, the SO(3 group has rank 1 and it has a single independent Casimir element 5, which is Ĵ 2 = Ĵ x 2 + Ĵ y 2 + Ĵ z 2. Therefore, there are three independent pairs of commuting operators: {Ĵ 2, Ĵx}, {Ĵ 2, Ĵy} and {Ĵ 2, Ĵz}. We can choose any one of these pairs to build a CSCO. Traditionally, the choice is {Ĵ 2, Ĵz}. So, assigning the two eigenvalues of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz (that is, fixing j and m, completely defines the eigenvector j, m. However, according to the last result of Sec. 14.2, since the J 2 is compatible with J x, J y and J z, but J x, J y and J z are reciprocally incompatible, we expect the eigenvalue j(j + 1 2 of Ĵ 2, to be degenerate. 4 It should be noted that at this point we are not making any assumption upon the either discrete or continuous nature of the eigenvalues j and m. Therefore, δ jj and δ mm can be interpreted either as discrete Kronecker s delta, or continuous Dirac s delta functions. 5 In our non-technical parlance, we can say that a Casimir operator is an operator that commutes with Ĵx, Ĵy and Ĵz.

14.4. EIGENVALUES AND EIGENVECTORS OF Ĵ 2 AND ĴZ 11 14.4 Properties of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz Let j(j + 1 2 and m be the eigenvalues of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz associated with the eigenvector j, m. Then j and m satisfy the following inequality: j m j. (14.48 To prove this assertion, consider first the two vectors Ĵ+ j, m and Ĵ j, m. By definition, their squared norms are nonnegative, that is Ĵ+ j, m 2 = j, m Ĵ Ĵ+ j, m 0, Ĵ j, m 2 = j, m Ĵ+Ĵ j, m 0, (14.49a (14.49b where we have used Ĵ =. Substituting (14.12 and (14.13 in the equations above, we find j, m Ĵ Ĵ+ j, m = j, m Ĵ 2 Ĵ 2 z Ĵz j, m = [ j(j + 1 m(m + 1 ] 2 j, m j, m 0, (14.50a j, m Ĵ+Ĵ j, m = j, m Ĵ 2 Ĵ 2 z + Ĵz j, m These equations imply = [ j(j + 1 m(m 1 ] 2 j, m j, m 0. (14.50b j(j + 1 m(m + 1 = (j m(j + m + 1 0, j(j + 1 m(m 1 = (j + m(j m + 1 0, (14.51a (14.51b where to obtain the right sides we have added the null term jm mj = 0 to the left sides. For example, j(j + 1 m(m + 1 = j(j + 1 m(m + 1 + jm mj = j(j + 1 + m m(m + 1 + j = (j m(j + m + 1. (14.52

12 LECTURE 14. ANGULAR MOMENTUM OPERATOR ALGEBRA Then, from (14.51a and (14.51b it follows that (j + 1 m j, j m j + 1, (14.53a (14.53b respectively. From j 0, it follows that (j + 1 < j j < j + 1. Therefore, equations (14.53a and (14.53b are satisfied together only if m satisfies the inequality j m j. (14.54 This proves (14.48. A necessary and sufficient condition for a ket ψ to be a null vector, that is ψ = 0, is that its norm vanishes: ψ ψ = 0. Therefore, from (14.49a,14.50a,14.51a it follows that Ĵ + j, m = 0 if and only if (j m(j + m + 1 = 0. (14.55 The solutions of the algebraic equation (j m(j +m+1 = 0 are m = j and m = j 1 < j. Since the values of m are constrained by j m j, only the solution m = j is acceptable and (14.55 implies: Ĵ + j, j = 0. (14.56 Similarly, from (14.49b,14.50b,14.51b it follows that Ĵ j, m = 0 if and only if (j + m(j m + 1 = 0, (14.57 and, therefore, Ĵ j, j = 0. (14.58 The converse relations are also true, namely Ĵ ± j, m = 0 = m = ±j. (14.59

14.4. EIGENVALUES AND EIGENVECTORS OF Ĵ 2 AND ĴZ 13 This is easy to prove. Applying Ĵ to both sides of Ĵ± j, m = 0 and using (14.13 and (14.51, we obtain Ĵ Ĵ ± j, m = ( Ĵ 2 Ĵ 2 z Ĵz j, m = 2[ j(j + 1 m(m ± 1 ] j, m = 2[ (j m(j ± m + 1 ] j, m = 0. (14.60 The last equality together with (14.48 implies m = ±j. What if m ±j? Then, the following two statements are true: 1 If m > j, Ĵ j, m is a non-null eigenvector of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz associated with the eigenvalues j(j + 1 2 and (m 1, respectively. 2 If m < j, Ĵ + j, m is a non-null eigenvector of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz associated with the eigenvalues j(j + 1 2 and (m + 1, respectively. To prove 1, first we notice that from (14.49b,14.50b it follows that Ĵ j, m is a non-null vector because its norm is positive for m > j. Then, we show that Ĵ j, m is an eigenvector of Ĵ 2. Using (14.10d, we can write [Ĵ ] 2, Ĵ j, m = 0. (14.61 This can be rewritten as Ĵ (Ĵ 2 j, m = Ĵ Ĵ 2 j, m = j(j + 1 (Ĵ 2 j, m, (14.62 which signifies that Ĵ j, m is an eigenvector of Ĵ 2 associated with the eigenvalue j(j + 1 2. Now, we prove that Ĵ j, m is an eigenvector of Ĵz. If we multiply from right both sides of (14.10b by j, m, we obtain ] [Ĵz, Ĵ j, m = Ĵ j, m, (14.63

14 LECTURE 14. ANGULAR MOMENTUM OPERATOR ALGEBRA which is equivalent to Ĵ z (Ĵ j, m = Ĵ Ĵz j, m Ĵ j, m = (m 1 (Ĵ j, m. (14.64 This shows that Ĵ j, m is an eigenvector of Ĵz with the eigenvalue (m 1. If m < j, we can use arguments similar to the ones leading to (14.62 and (14.64, to prove statement 2. Of course, we must replace Ĵ j, m with Ĵ + j, m, work again with (14.10d and use (14.10a instead of (14.10b. The final result is: Ĵ 2 j, m = j(j + 1 2 j, m, Ĵ z j, m = (m + 1 j, m. (14.65 These relations may be straightforwardly generalized to include powers of Ĵ±, that is (Ĵ± n, where n = 1, 2,... is a positive integer. Specifically, we assert that 3 If j + n m j, then (Ĵ n j, m is an eigenvector of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz associated with the eigenvalues j(j + 1 2 and (m n, respectively. 4 If j m j n, then n j, m is an eigenvector of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz associated with the eigenvalues j(j + 1 2 and (m + n, respectively. The proof is very simple. First, we use (14.23 to write: [Ĵ 2, ( Ĵ ± n ] j, m = 0, (14.66 which can be rewritten as Ĵ 2 [ (Ĵ± n j, m ] = ( Ĵ ± nĵ 2 j, m = j(j + 1 2 [ (Ĵ± n j, m ]. (14.67

14.5. THE SPECTRUM OF Ĵ 2 AND ĴZ 15 This relation means that ( n j, Ĵ ± m is an eigenvector of Ĵ 2 with eigenvalue j(j + 1 2. Next, if we multiply from right both sides of equations (14.15 by j, m, we obtain [Ĵz, ( n ] n j, Ĵ ± j, m = ±n (Ĵ± m, (14.68 namely, Ĵ z [ (Ĵ± n j, m ] = ( Ĵ ± nĵ z j, m ± n ( Ĵ ± n j, m Therefore, ( Ĵ ± n j, m is an eigenvector of Ĵz = m ( n j, n j, Ĵ ± m ± n (Ĵ± m [ ] n j, = (m ± n (Ĵ± m. (14.69 with eigenvalue (m ± n. However, since (14.48 requires that j m j, we must demand j m + n j j m j n, (14.70a j m n j j + n m j. (14.70b This concludes the demonstration of statements 3 and 4. 14.5 The spectrum of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz Now we are able to determine the possible values of j and m, that is, the spectrum of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz. According to our previous findings, since the set {J 2, J z } is a CSCO, the knowledge of j and m uniquely identify the eigenvector j, m common to Ĵ 2 and Ĵz. Therefore, once we know the spectrum of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz, we also know the common eigenvectors. Thus, let j(j + 1 2 and m be the eigenvalues of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz associated with the eigenvector j, m. We do not make any hypothesis about the values of j and m; we only require, according to (14.48, that j and m satisfy the inequality j m j, with j 0. So, at this stage m can be any real number between j and j.

16 LECTURE 14. ANGULAR MOMENTUM OPERATOR ALGEBRA Consider the two vectors p j, m and (Ĵ q j, m, where p and q are nonnegative integers. According to 3 of the previous section, (Ĵ q j, m is an eigenvector of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz with the eigenvalues j(j + 1 2 and (m q, respectively. Similarly, from 4 it follows that p j, m is an eigenvector of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz with the eigenvalues j(j + 1 2 and (m + p, respectively. As usual, (14.48 requires that j m q, m + p j. (14.71a (14.71b Now, let us choose p and q to be the greatest nonnegative integers such that: m (q + 1 < j, m + (p + 1 > j, (14.72a (14.72b as illustrated in Fig. 14.2. m - q m - 1 m m + 1 m + p a b j j m Figure 14.2: Graphical representation of the inequalities (14.72. By hypothesis, the nonnegative integers q and p are chosen to satisfy a = j +(m q < 1 and b = j (m+p < 1. The intervals a and b are pictured as gray bands. The unnormalized eigenvectors of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz with the eigenvalues of Ĵz proportional to m q,..., m 1, m, m + 1,..., m + p, (14.73 are, according to 3 and 4 of the previous section, (Ĵ q j, m,..., Ĵ j, m, j, m, Ĵ + j, m,..., ( Ĵ + p j, m. (14.74

14.5. THE SPECTRUM OF Ĵ 2 AND ĴZ 17 It is important to understand that these are the only possible vectors with these properties, because the pair (j, m uniquely identify (up to an irrelevant multiplicative numerical constant the eigenvector j, m. Given the leftmost and the rightmost vectors ( q j, p j, Ĵ m and m, we can calculate [ ] [ q+1 j, ] q+1 j, Ĵ z (Ĵ m = (m q 1 (Ĵ m, (14.75a [ ] [ p+1 j, ] p+1 j, Ĵ z m = (m + p + 1 m. (14.75b According to (14.75a, either ( Ĵ q+1 j, m = 0 or (Ĵ q+1 j, m is an eigenvector of Ĵ z with eigenvalue m q 1. However, from (14.72 it follows that m q 1 < j, in contradiction with (14.48. Therefore, we conclude that ( Ĵ q+1 j, m = 0. An analogous argument yields to p+1 j, m = 0. When a vector is null, its norm is equal to zero, that is ( q+1 j, 2 q+1 q+1 j, Ĵ m = j, m (Ĵ m = 0, ( Ĵ + p+1 j, m 2 = j, m (Ĵ p+1 p+1 j, m = 0. It is convenient to rewrite these equations as: (14.76a (14.76b j, m ( Ĵ + q+1 (Ĵ q+1 j, m = j, m q Ĵ (Ĵ q j, m = 0, (14.77a j, m ( Ĵ p+1 p+1 j, m = j, m (Ĵ p (Ĵ Ĵ + p j, m = 0. (14.77b Substituting (14.12 and (14.13 in the equations above, we find α Ĵ+Ĵ α = α Ĵ 2 Ĵ 2 z + Ĵz α = [ j(j + 1 (m q(m q 1 ] 2 α α = 0, (14.78a β Ĵ Ĵ+ β = β Ĵ 2 Ĵ 2 z Ĵz β = [ j(j + 1 (m + p(m + p + 1 ] 2 β β = 0, (14.78b

18 LECTURE 14. ANGULAR MOMENTUM OPERATOR ALGEBRA where we have used the shorthand notation, Equations (14.78 imply that: α ( Ĵ q j, m, β p j, m. (14.79 j(j + 1 (m q(m q 1 = (j + m q(j m + q + 1 = 0, (14.80a j(j + 1 (m + p(m + p + 1 = (j m p(j + m + p + 1 = 0. (14.80b The solution of these two algebraic equations are: m = q j, or m = j + (q + 1 > j, (14.81a m = j p, or m = j (p + 1 < j. (14.81b According to the condition (14.48, the only acceptable solutions are: m = q j m q = j, (14.82a m = j p m + p = j. (14.82b Clearly, these two equalities are satisfied simultaneously only if q j = j p j = q + p 2. (14.83 Therefore, j is equal to a positive or zero integer (by hypothesis q and p are nonnegative integers divided by 2: j = 0, 1 2, 1, 3 2,... (14.84 Equations (14.82 imply that if j is an integer, all m values are integers; if j is a half-integer, all m values are half-integers. The allowed values of m for a given j are therefore: that is j = m q, m q + 1,..., m + p 1, m + p = j, (14.85 m = j, j + 1,..., j 1, j. (14.86 }{{} 2j + 1 values

14.6. MATRIX ELEMENTS OF ANGULAR-MOMENTUM OPERATORS19 This equation expresses the fact that each eigenvalue j(j + 1 2 of Ĵ 2, is 2j + 1 times degenerate. We predicted this degeneracy at the end of Sec. 14.3, on the ground of commutation relations (14.1. To illustrate the procedure of building the set { j, m } of 2j + 1 eigenvectors of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz with a given j, suppose to fix a value of j and to consider the eigenvector j, j with m = j. This implies q = 0 and p = 2j, that is one needs 2j steps to reach the other side of the spectrum with m = j. Therefore, the eigenvalues of Ĵz are: m = j, j + 1,..., j 1, j, (14.87 and the associated (unnormalized eigenvectors of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz, are obtained by applying 2j times 6 the ladder operator Ĵ+ to j, j : j, j, Ĵ + j, j,..., ( 2j 1 j, 2j j, Ĵ + j, j. (14.88 Vice versa, if we start from the eigenvector j, j with m = j, then we have q = 2j and p = 0. In this case, obviously the eigenvalues of Ĵz are still m = j, j + 1,..., j 1, j, (14.89 and the associated (unnormalized eigenvectors of Ĵ 2 and Ĵz, are obtained by applying 2j times the ladder operator Ĵ to j, j : 2j j, 2j 1 j, (Ĵ j, (Ĵ j,..., Ĵ j, j, j, j. (14.90 14.6 Matrix elements of angular-momentum operators Let us assume that the kets j, m are normalized: j, m j, m = δ jj δ mm. (14.91 6 Note that from (14.83 it follows that the number 2j = q+p is necessarily a nonnegative integer.

20 LECTURE 14. ANGULAR MOMENTUM OPERATOR ALGEBRA Then, from equations (14.46 we clearly have and j, m Ĵ 2 j, m = j(j + 1 2 δ jj δ mm, (14.92 j, m Ĵz j, m = m δ jj δ mm. (14.93 To find the matrix elements of Ĵx and Ĵy, we first calculate the matrix elements of Ĵ±. We have from (14.60 j, m Ĵ Ĵ± j, m = 2[ (j m(j ± m + 1 ]. (14.94 Since Ĵ± j, m is an eigenvector of Ĵz with eigenvalue (m ± 1, then it must be the same as j, m ± 1 up to a multiplicative constant 7. Thus, we set Ĵ ± j, m = c ± jm j, m ± 1, (14.95 where the coefficients c ± jm have to be determined. Substituting this expression in the left side of (14.94, we obtain c ± jm 2 = 2[ (j m(j ± m + 1 ]. (14.96 This equation determines c ± jm up to an arbitrary phase factor. Conventionally, this phase is chosen to be zero. This choice guarantees that the matrix elements of Ĵ± are all nonnegative; this is called the Condon-Shortley phase convention. So, we found Ĵ ± j, m = (j m(j ± m + 1 j, m ± 1. (14.97 Therefore, the matrix elements of Ĵ± are j, m Ĵ± j, m = (j m(j ± m + 1 δ jj δ m±1,m. (14.98 7 Remember that by definition, the eigenvalues a, b,..., z, of the operators Â, ˆB,..., Ẑ corresponding to a CSCO {A, B,..., Z}, uniquely determine the eigenvectors a, b,..., z up to a multiplicative constant. Therefore, since Ĵ± j, m and j, m ± 1 are associated with the same pair of eigenvalues j(j +1 2 and (m±1, it must be Ĵ± j, m j, m±1.

14.6. MATRIX ELEMENTS OF ANGULAR-MOMENTUM OPERATORS21 Finally, we determine the matrix elements of Ĵx and Ĵy to be and j, m Ĵx j, m = 1 2 [ ] j, m Ĵ+ j, m + j, m Ĵ j, m, (14.99 j, m Ĵy j, m = 1 [ ] j, m Ĵ+ j, m j, m Ĵ j, m. (14.100 2 i