High Throughput Water Analysis using Agilent 7900 ICP-MS coupled with ESI prepfast

Similar documents
The Agilent 7700x ICP-MS Advantage for Drinking Water Analysis

Simple, reliable analysis of high matrix samples according to US EPA Method 6020A using the Agilent 7700x/7800 ICP-MS

Enhancing the productivity of food sample analysis with the Agilent 7700x ICP-MS

Trace elemental analysis of distilled alcoholic beverages using the Agilent 7700x ICP-MS with octopole collision/ reaction cell

High-Speed Environmental Analysis Using the Agilent 7500cx with Integrated Sample Introduction System Discrete Sampling (ISIS DS)

Simple and Reliable Soil Analysis using the Agilent 7800 ICP-MS with ISIS 3

Real World Analysis of Trace Metals in Drinking Water Using the Agilent 7500ce ICP-MS with Enhanced ORS Technology. Application. Authors.

Multi-Element Analysis of Cannabis using the Agilent 7800 ICP-MS

Rapid Analysis of High-Matrix Environmental Samples Using the Agilent 7500cx ICP-MS. Application. Author. Abstract. Introduction.

Direct Measurement of Metallic Impurities in 20% Ammonium Hydroxide by 7700s/7900 ICP-MS

China Soil Pollution Survey: Elemental Analysis of Soil and Sediment Digests by ICP-MS

The ultratrace determination of iodine 129 in aqueous samples using the 7700x ICP-MS with oxygen reaction mode

Determination of trace elements in ultrapure semiconductor grade sulfuric acid using the Agilent 8900 ICP-QQQ in MS/MS mode

Multi Analyte Custom Grade Solution. Calcium, Iron, Potassium,

Elemental Scientific. Stability. Elemental Scientific

Analysis of Trace Metal Impurities in High Purity Hydrochloric Acid Using ICP-QQQ

Multi-Element Analysis of Petroleum Crude Oils using an Agilent 7900 ICP-MS

Direct Analysis of Trace Metal Impurities in High Purity Nitric Acid Using ICP-QQQ

Elemental Scientific. Spike Recovery. Elemental Scientific

ICP/MS Multi-Element Standards

Implementing EPA Method 6020 with the Agilent ICP-MS Portfolio

On-line isotope dilution analysis with the 7700 Series ICP-MS: Analysis of trace elements in high matrix samples

Analysis of Arsenic, Selenium and Antimony in Seawater by Continuous-Flow Hydride ICP-MS with ISIS

Rapid, simple, interference-free analysis of environmental samples using the XSERIES 2 ICP-MS with 3 rd generation CCT ED

Determination of challenging elements in ultrapure semiconductor grade sulfuric acid by Triple Quadrupole ICP-MS

Determination of Chromium in Gelatin Capsules using an Agilent 7700x ICP-MS

Rapid Sample Assessment and Simplified Method Development with IntelliQuant

Analysis of domestic sludge using the Agilent 4200 MP-AES

Quantitative analysis of high purity metals using laser ablation coupled to an Agilent 7900 ICP-MS

Elemental analysis of river sediment using the Agilent 4200 MP-AES

Application. Determination of Trace Metal Impurities in Semiconductor-Grade Hydrofluoric Acid. Authors. Introduction. Abstract.

Total Elemental Analysis of Food Samples for Routine and Research Laboratories, using the Thermo Scientific icap RQ ICP-MS

Samples compliant with the WATER

Thermo Scientific icap TQ ICP-MS: Typical limits of detection

Validating performance of an Agilent 7800 ICP MS for USP <232>/<233> & ICH Q3D/Q2(R1): Elemental Impurity Analysis in Pharmaceuticals

Thermo Scientific icap RQ ICP-MS: Typical limits of detection

Elemental Scientific. Spike Recovery. Elemental Scientific

ANALYSIS CERTIFICATE OF

Fast Analysis of Water Samples Comparing Axially-and Radially- Viewed CCD Simultaneous ICP-OES

Trace Analyses in Metal Matrices Using the ELAN DRC II

Determination of major, minor and trace elements in rice fl our using the 4200 Microwave Plasma- Atomic Emission Spectrometer (MP-AES) Authors

U.S. EPA SW-846 Method 6010C using the Prodigy High Dispersion ICP

High-Throughput Semiquantitative Screening of Ambient Air Samples by ORS-ICP-MS and Integrated Sample Introduction System (ISIS) Application

Automated Determination of PPQ Levels of Thorium in High Purity Copper

Performance of the Agilent 7900 ICP-MS with UHMI for high salt matrix analysis

Application of the Agilent 7900 ICP-MS with Method Automation function for the routine determination of trace metallic components in food CRMs

Application note. Trace level analysis of sulfur, phosphorus, silicon and chlorine in NMP using the Agilent 8800 Triple Quadrupole ICP-MS

Semiquantitative Screening of Pharmaceutical Antiviral Drugs using the Agilent 7500ce ICP-MS in Helium Collision Mode

Ultra-fast determination of base metals in geochemical samples using the 5100 SVDV ICP-OES

Comparing Collision/Reaction Cell Modes for the Measurement of Interfered Analytes in Complex Matrices using the Agilent 7700 Series ICP-MS

Determination of Impurities in Silica Wafers with the NexION 300S/350S ICP-MS

METHOD 3010A ACID DIGESTION OF AQUEOUS SAMPLES AND EXTRACTS FOR TOTAL METALS FOR ANALYSIS BY FLAA OR ICP SPECTROSCOPY

Analysis of high matrix samples using argon gas dilution with the Thermo Scientific icap RQ ICP-MS

Applications of ICP-MS for Trace Elemental Analysis in the Hydrocarbon Processing Industry

Automated, intelligent sample preparation: Integration of the ESI prepfast Auto-dilution System with the Thermo Scientific icap 7400 ICP-OES

Accurate analysis of neptunium 237 in a uranium matrix, using ICP-QQQ with MS/MS

Determination of ultratrace elements in photoresist solvents using the Thermo Scientific icap TQs ICP-MS

Total elemental analysis of food samples for routine and research laboratories using the Thermo Scientific icap RQ ICP-MS

METHOD 6010A INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA-ATOMIC EMISSION SPECTROSCOPY

U.S. EPA SW-846 Method 6010C Using the Prodigy7 High- Dispersion ICP Introduction. Application Note - AN1305. Experimental

Ultra trace measurement of potassium and other elements in ultrapure water using the Agilent 8800 ICP-QQQ in cool plasma reaction cell mode

Agilent ICP-MS Journal September 2009 Issue 39

Direct Measurement of Trace Metals in Edible Oils by 7500cx ICP-MS with Octopole Reaction System

Application Note. Abstract. Authors

Lead isotope analysis: Removal of 204 Hg isobaric interference from 204 Pb using ICP-QQQ in MS/MS mode

Fergus Keenan Shona McSheehy Julian Wills

Today s Agilent Solutions for Determining Heavy Metals in Food using Atomic Spectroscopy

Chapter 2 Atoms and the Periodic Table

Direct Analysis of Photoresist Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) Application

Single-Element Standards for AAS

Determination of Trace Metals in Human Urine Using the NexION 300 ICP-MS

The Investigation of Fertilizer Analyses Using Microwave Digestion and the Agilent 720-ES

ICP-OES Application Note Number 35

Determination of Pb, Cd, Cr and Ni in Grains Based on Four Chinese National Methods via Zeeman GFAAS

Authors: C. Derrick Quarles, Jr. *, Patrick Sullivan, M. Paul Field, Hwan Kim, and Daniel R. Wiederin

ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY APPLICATIONS IN THE CONTRACT ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY. Primer July 2015 Edition

Agilent ICP-MS. Fundamentals of ICP-MS Analysis and Its Applications for Low Level Elemental Determination in Cannabis

Full file at

icap TQ ICP-MS Applications Compendium

Key Analytical Issues: Sample Preparation, Interferences and Variability. Tim Shelbourn, Eli Lilly and Company

Writing Chemical formula with polyatomic groups

OES - Optical Emission Spectrometer 2000

Agilent 7500a Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS)

Electron Configurations

Rapid determination of five arsenic species in polished rice using HPLC-ICP-MS

Multi Analyte Custom Grade Solution. Aluminum, Potassium, Magnesium, ANALYTE CERTIFIED VALUE ANALYTE CERTIFIED VALUE

Fundamentals of the ICP-MS Technique and How to Resolve Issues for Pharmaceutical Materials (In 20 Minutes) Tim Shelbourn, Eli Lilly and Company

Speciation of Bromine Compounds in Ozonated Drinking Water using Ion Chromatography and Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

William O. Moellmer, Theron G. Miller, Steve Wilbur, and Emmett Soffey

Sensitive Detection of 2-MIB and Geosmin in Drinking Water

Agilent 8900 Triple Quadrupole ICP-MS

Method 0060 or Method 29. Method for Determining Metals and Mercury Emissions in Stack Gas

Note that the protons and neutrons are each almost 2,000 times more massive than an electron; What is the approximate diameter of an atom?

ALLOWAY METHOD OUTLINE

Accurate Analysis of Trace Mercury in Cosmetics using the Agilent 8900 ICP-QQQ

Agilent Technologies at TIAFT 2013

Product Safety Reference Manual. Book 5 - Laboratory Policies and Procedures C

High Sensitivity HPLC Analysis of Perchlorate in Tap Water Using an Agilent 6460 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS System

APPENDIX C TO PART 136 INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA ATOMIC EMISSION SPECTROMETRIC METHOD FOR TRACE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF WATER AND WASTES METHOD

The Determination of Toxic, Trace, and Essential Elements in Food Matrices using THGA Coupled with Longitudinal Zeeman Background Correction

Transcription:

High Throughput Water Analysis using Agilent 7900 ICP-MS coupled with ESI prepfast Application Note Environmental Authors Austin Schultz and Jake Unnerstall, Elemental Scientific, Omaha NE, USA Steve Wilbur, Agilent Technologies Inc, Washington, USA Introduction Agilent ICP-MS users can simplify the routine elemental analysis of environmental, food, pharmaceutical, and other sample types using Elemental Scientific s (ESI) fully automated prepfast M5 autodilution system. Based on the ESI FAST autosampler, prepfast M5 is capable of discrete sampling, automated dilution of calibration standards, and autodiluting out-of-range samples using a precise and accurate syringe-based dilution approach [1]. Utilizing Agilent s ICP-MS MassHunter Software Developer s Kit (SDK), ESI has integrated operation and control of prepfast into Agilent s ICP-MS MassHunter software (from revision 4.3 onwards). The ESI software plug-in for ICP-MS MassHunter allows all prepfast functions to be operated seamlessly from within the MassHunter Batch software. By fully integrating prepfast control in this way, autocalibration and autodilution functionality become part of the method. As a discrete sampling device for ICP-MS, prepfast is ideally suited to the rapid analysis of high numbers of environmental samples in compliance with standard and regulatory methods. Many labs use the long-established US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 200.8 for guidance on the analysis of groundwaters, surface waters, drinking waters, and wastewaters by ICP-MS [2].

Laboratories that use method 200.8 are required to carry out several performance and quality control (QC) tests to verify the quality of the data. In this study, an Agilent 7900 ICP-MS, equipped with an ESI prepfast autodilution system, was used for the analysis of drinking and bottled water samples in accordance with EPA Method 200.8 QC criteria. These criteria include: A check on over-range sample concentration results, with an upper limit set at 120% of the top calibration point, above which the sample must be diluted and re-run. Internal Standard (ISTD) recovery limits of 60 to 125%, with out-of-range recoveries triggering sample dilution. Automated analysis of Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) and Continuing Calibration Blank (CCB) solutions after every 10 samples. CCV recoveries must be within ±10% of the reference value. Experimental Samples and solutions The sample list comprised three drinking water samples: a filtered Omaha tap water, tap water A, and tap water B; seven commercially available bottled water samples; and Standard Reference Material (SRM) NIST 1643f Trace Elements in Water (undiluted and 2x diluted). The prepfast autosampler rack was loaded with two vials of each of the 11 samples. The complete set of 22 samples was analyzed 10 times, with the sample order being the same for each run. There were 10 replicates of each sample, not including any reanalysis resulting from out-of-range QC failures. All solutions (diluent, carrier, rinse, internal standard, calibration standards) were prepared using 2% HNO 3 and 1% HCl. HCl was included to ensure the stability of the elements Ag, Sb, and Hg in solution. The 29 elements listed in Table 2 were calibrated from a single mixed stock standard, which was automatically diluted at factors of 100x, 50x, 20x, 10x, 5x, 2x, and 1x (undiluted) using the prepfast system. The ISTD mix, containing 72 Ge, 89 Y, 103 Rh, and 175 Lu, was automatically added to the samples at 20 ppb using prepfast. To simulate an ISTD out-of-range sample, one of the bottled water samples was spiked with an extra 21 ppb of Y. Instrumentation An Agilent 7900 ICP-MS with standard nickel cones was used for the analysis. The instrument was fitted with the PFA-ST nebulizer that is included with the prepfast system. Agilent ICP-MS systems include four argon gas lines as standard. In 2 addition to the plasma and auxiliary gas flows, both a nebulizer gas and a make-up gas line are supplied. This arrangement allows the nebulizer gas flow to be optimized independently from the total gas flow that carries the aerosol from the spray chamber into the plasma. In the case of the PFA-ST nebulizer, the optimum nebulizer gas flow is 0.7 L/min, so an additional 0.5 L/min make-up flow was used to give the optimum total carrier flow. The 7900 features a fourth-generation Octopole Reaction System (ORS 4 ) collision/ reaction cell, which includes a helium (He) mode cell gas line for the removal of common polyatomic interferences on most analyte elements. The General Purpose plasma mode was used, as defined in the Preset Method for drinking water analysis that is included in the ICP-MS MassHunter software. Cell modes (no gas and He) were autotuned independently, although parameters related to sample introduction and plasma conditions were consistent for both modes. The cell gas flow and energy discrimination values are also pre-defined in the Preset Method. Instrument operating conditions are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Agilent 7900 ICP-MS operating conditions. Parameter No gas He Plasma mode General purpose RF power (W) 1500 Sample depth (mm) 11 Carrier gas flow rate (L/min) 0.7 Make up gas flow rate (L/min) 0.5 Lens tune Autotune Cell gas flow rate (ml/min) 0 4.5 Energy discrimination (V) 5 Shaded parameters are predefined in the Preset Method for drinking water Figure 1. The prepfast system attached to the 7900 ICP-MS

The 7900 ICP-MS was connected to the ESI prepfast M5 autodilution system (Figure 1). The integrated system offers the following advantages for trace elemental analysis of environmental samples: Discrete sampling to reduce the analysis time to approximately 2 minutes per sample. Automated, real-time preparation of calibration standards from a single stock solution located in the autosampler rack. Instrument detection limits (IDLs) of 0.036 µg/l for V and 0.022 µg/l for As were obtained. The IDLs were based on three replicates, due to the limited measurement time available with discrete sampling. The low IDLs and sub-ppb background equivalent concentrations (BECs) of 0.35 ppb for V and 0.06 ppb for As demonstrate the efficient removal of the Cl-based interferences in He mode on the 7900 ICP-MS. prepfast M5 can dilute a calibration stock standard by up to a factor of 400, to give a multi-level calibration. If a wider calibration range is needed, two separate stock standards at different concentrations can each be diluted up to 400x to give a combined calibration range covering more than 4 orders of magnitude. Prescriptive autodilution: the analyst specifies the dilution factor for each sample ahead of time in the method Batch file, and prepfast dilutes the sample accordingly, directly from the autosampler. Intelligent autodilution: the operator specifies QC limits for out-of-range analytes and internal standards. ICP-MS MassHunter intelligently calculates the necessary dilution factors for any out-of-range samples based on these criteria. The user can select which elements or ISTDs to check for outlier conditions. ICP-MS MassHunter automatically checks the results and control limits for the selected elements, and calculates the minimum dilution factor required to bring the furthest outlier into range. prepfast dilutes the sample using the calculated dilution factor, and adds it to the sample list for reanalysis. The integrated TuneSelect valve provides selection of up to four different carrier or tune solutions for automated tuning or other tasks such as Startup tasks and EPA Tune Check. The TuneSelect valve supports unattended tuning and optimization of the ICP-MS without requiring any manual movement of the carrier line or changes to the plumbing. Figure 2. Calibration curves for V and As in He mode, showing effective reduction of Cl interferences. All standards contain 2% HNO 3 and 1% HCl. Cd and Hg are environmentally critical elements, and are controlled at the lowest maximum allowable concentrations in most drinking water regulations [3]. These elements are often measured in no gas mode to maximize sensitivity, but both can suffer from polyatomic overlaps in some natural matrices (from MoO + on Cd + at m/z 111 and WO + on Hg + at m/z 202). It is therefore beneficial to measure both elements in He mode if sensitivity can be maintained. The sub-ng/l (ppt) IDLs (0.5 ppt for Cd and 0.8 ppt for Hg) and low ppt BECs (5.2 ppt for Cd and 7.5 ppt for Hg) demonstrate the excellent sensitivity and low background achieved for these trace analytes in He mode. Results and Discussion Calibration Representative calibration curves for several trace elements are shown in Figure 2 (V and As) and Figure 3 (Cd and Hg). All curves show excellent linearity across the calibration range. Both V and As are subject to polyatomic overlap in chloride matrices (from ClO + on V + at m/z 51, and ArCl + on As + at m/z 75). Figure 3. Calibration curves for low-level elements Cd and Hg, illustrating sub-ppt instrumental DLs in He mode and excellent precision and linearity at low concentrations. 3

Method detection limits Method detection limits (MDLs) were determined for 29 elements including all analytes specified in EPA Method 200.8. The 3σ MDLs were calculated from the analysis of seven replicate aliquots of the spiked calibration blank (2% HNO 3 and 1% HCl). According to method 200.8 requirements, MDL replicates were spiked at ~2-5x the estimated MDL concentration. Table 2. List of analytes and 7900 ICP-MS MDLs. Analyte Preferred isotope Mode 7900 ICP-MS MDL Lithium (Li) 7 No gas 0.002 Beryllium (Be) 9 No gas 0.001 Boron (B) 11 No gas 0.06 Sodium (Na) 23 He 0.2 Magnesium (Mg) 24 He 0.04 Aluminum (Al) 27 He 0.1 Potassium (K) 39 He 3.3 Calcium (Ca) 44 He 4.0 Vanadium (V) 51 He 0.03 Chromium (Cr) 52 He 0.01 Manganese (Mn) 55 He 0.004 Iron (Fe) 56 He 0.05 Cobalt (Co) 59 He 0.001 Nickel (Ni) 60 He 0.02 Copper (Cu) 63 He 0.007 Zinc (Zn) 66 He 0.03 Arsenic (As) 75 He 0.01 Selenium (Se) 78 He 0.3 Strontium (Sr) 88 He 0.03 Molybdenum (Mo) 95 He 0.003 Silver (Ag) 107 He 0.003 Cadmium (Cd) 111 He 0.002 Antimony (Sb) 121 He 0.008 Barium (Ba) 137 He 0.008 Mercury (Hg) 202 He 0.01 Thallium (Tl) 205 He 0.0005 Lead (Pb) 208 + He 0.0004 Thorium (Th) 232 He 0.002 Uranium (U) 238 He 0.0004 *Shaded cells indicate additional analytes to those specified in Method 200.8 + Pb data is based on the sum of the 208, 207 and 206 isotopes Intelligent autodilution of out-of-range analytes and ISTDs Operation and control of the prepfast is seamlessly integrated into the Agilent ICP-MS MassHunter software. The analyst specifies the required QC limits in the ICP-MS MassHunter prepfast Batch window. If the out-of-range limits are exceeded, MassHunter calculates the appropriate dilution factor needed to bring the out-of-range analytes within the calibration range, and sends this to prepfast. In a real-time update to the sample list, prepfast then re-runs the sample with the calculated dilution factor as a QC Action on Failure (AOF). This function is similar to standard QC AOF in ICP-MS MassHunter, and requires no intervention from the analyst. Similarly, if an ISTD signal exceeds the user-set recovery range, the sample is autodiluted 5x (and then 10x if needed) to bring the ISTD recovery within the defined range. In this study, the ISTD recovery range was set to much tighter limits of 80-120% instead of the 60-125% range specified in 200.8. The tighter limits reflect the QC requirements specified in some labs operating procedures. One of the bottled water samples was spiked with Y at 21 ppb. The spike was in addition to the 20 ppb Y ISTD automatically added to each sample. The theoretical concentrations and ratios given in Table 3 show that a 10x dilution of the spiked sample would be required to bring the total Y concentration within 20% of the ISTD reference level (of 20 ppb). This theory was confirmed from the analytical results for the bottled water sample spiked with an extra 21 ppb Y, as shown in Table 4. At 5x dilution, the added Y still causes the Y ISTD recovery to exceed the 120% limit, so a 10x dilution was required to ensure that the sample passed the QC check. The recoveries of the other internal standards remained within the QC limits for all dilutions of the sample. Table 3. Expected concentrations and recoveries for Y ISTD in various dilutions of a water sample spiked with an extra 21 ppb Y. prepfast dilution factor Y from spike Total conc. of Y Expected conc. of Y Ratio of Total Y/ ISTD Y 1 21.0 41.0 20.0 205% 5 4.2 24.2 20.0 121% 10 2.1 22.1 20.0 111% Table 4. Measured ISTD recoveries (He mode) at various dilutions for a bottled water sample spiked with an extra 21 ppb Y. Dilution ISTD Recovery (%) 89 Y 103 Rh 175 Lu 1 203.5 103.7 103.3 5 124.2 107.0 104.8 10 110.3 103.7 105.4 4

Dilution accuracy In this study, NIST SRM 1643f Trace Elements in Water was analyzed undiluted and at 2x dilution. All recoveries were well within the Method 200.8 criteria of ±30%, and the recoveries for most of the certified elements were within ±10% in the undiluted and 2x diluted samples, as shown in Table 5. Since the level of Ba in the undiluted and 2x diluted SRM was more than 20% above the 100 ppb top calibration level, an automatic 10x dilution of the sample was triggered after each analysis of the SRM at 1x or 2x dilution. Again, excellent recoveries for the certified elements were achieved at the 10x dilution level, as shown in Table 5. Table 5. Recovery tests using different dilutions of NIST 1643f, (n=20). Element Mode Expected value Average found Undiluted 1643f 2x Diluted 1643f 10x Autodiluted 1643f % Recovery Average found % Recovery Average found 7 Li No gas 17.4 21.6 124 18.6 107 17.5 101 9 Be No gas 14.0 15.9 113 14.6 104 14.0 100 11 B No gas 157.9 171.2 108 147.6 93 170.0 108 23 Na He 20740.0 20188.3 97 20237.4 98 19652.7 95 24 Mg He 8037.0 8071.8 100 7863.1 98 7553.2 94 27 Al He 141.8 148.1 104 146.5 103 140.5 99 39 K He 2034.0 2135.3 105 2037.8 100 1929.0 95 44 Ca He 32300.0 30178.4 93 30028.9 93 29053.3 90 51 V He 37.9 37.9 100 36.6 97 35.0 92 52 Cr He 20.4 18.8 92 19.2 94 18.4 90 55 Mn He 39.0 37.6 97 38.1 98 37.1 95 56 Fe He 98.1 97.5 99 99.0 101 96.1 98 59 Co He 27.1 25.9 96 26.7 99 26.1 96 60 Ni He 62.4 60.0 96 61.8 99 60.9 98 63 Cu He 22.8 22.0 97 21.9 96 21.9 96 66 Zn He 78.5 76.5 97 78.1 99 77.0 98 75 As He 60.5 58.3 96 58.9 97 57.1 94 78 Se He 12.0 12.2 102 12.4 104 11.7 98 88 Sr He 323.1 329.4 102 325.6 101 307.5 95 95 Mo He 121.4 116.0 96 114.2 94 108.9 90 107 Ag He 1.1 0.9 88 1.0 89 0.9 83 111 Cd He 6.6 6.1 93 6.0 92 5.7 87 121 Sb He 58.3 59.6 102 58.3 100 55.4 95 137 Ba He 544.2 516.8 95 515.4 95 490.1 90 % Recovery 202 Hg He N/A <DL N/A <DL N/A <DL N/A 205 Tl He 7.4 7.0 94 7.0 94 6.8 91 208 Pb He 19.6 18.3 93 18.5 94 17.9 91 238 U He N/A <DL N/A <DL N/A <DL N/A 5

Intelligent autodilution of over-range samples The ICP-MS MassHunter method was set up to autodilute a sample if the measured concentration of any analyte was more than 20% above the top calibration standard. The AOF specified that the sample should be reanalyzed using a custom dilution factor calculated to bring all elements below the top calibration point. One of the tap water samples analyzed in this study had levels of Ca, Na, Mg, and Cu more than 20% higher than the top calibration standard concentration of 10,000 ppb (100 ppb for Cu), and so beyond the acceptable limit above the top calibration point (Table 6). Immediately after the undiluted sample was analyzed, the over-range results triggered an automatic re-run of the sample at a dilution factor of 20x, bringing all analytes within the calibration range. Table 6. Over-range sample analysis triggered by Ca, Na, Mg, Sr, and Cu. Element Mode Calibration range QC limit Undiluted tap water 20x diluted tap water reported 7 Li No gas 120 71.8 67.2 9 Be No gas 120 0 0 11 B No gas 12000 153.1 145.3 23 Na He 12000 75494* 73708 24 Mg He 12000 44844* 42091 27 Al He 12000 19.4 18.0 39 K He 12000 6752 6776 44 Ca He 12000 129064* 131390 51 V He 120 0.08 0 52 Cr He 120 0.1 0.04 55 Mn He 120 0.7 0.6 56 Fe He 12000 5.3 4.1 59 Co He 120 0.05 0.04 60 Ni He 120 0.4 0.4 63 Cu He 120 769.8* 852.0 66 Zn He 120 21.9 22.6 75 As He 120 0.4 0.2 78 Se He 120 0.5 0.3 88 Sr He 120 1254* 1152 95 Mo He 120 2.8 2.5 107 Ag He 120 0.01 0.03 111 Cd He 120 0.005 0.01 121 Sb He 120 0.09 0 137 Ba He 120 57.0 52.3 202 Hg He 120 0.002 0 205 Tl He 120 0.001 0 208 Pb He 120 1.30 1.26 238 U He 120 1.65 1.63 QC recovery tests Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) recoveries for all analytes were automatically measured after every 10 samples during the analytical sequence, as shown in Figure 4. All CCV recoveries were within the ±10 % limits defined in EPA method 200.8. Figure 4. CCV recoveries (2 ppm for B, Na, Ca, Al, K, Mg, and Fe; 1 ppb for Hg; 20 ppb for all other elements) for the 11 hour sequence. The red lines show the ±10 % control limits. The ISTD recovery plot shown in Figure 5 includes three samples that had been deliberately spiked with Y, in addition to the ISTD. Three different levels of Y were added: 7, 14 and 21 ppb, to show that the spiked sample would be diluted appropriately as a result of the out-of-range ISTD. Figure 5. Internal standard recovery plot showing three samples that had been spiked with increasing concentrations of Y at 7, 14 and 21 ppb to trigger an automatic dilution for out-of-range ISTD recovery. The red lines show the custom ±20 % control limits used in this work. For the ISTD recovery plot shown in Figure 6, the three samples that were deliberately spiked with Y have been removed. In this plot, all ISTD recoveries are within the ±20% limits indicated by the red lines. *Indicates those analytes that were >20% above calibration range in the undiluted sample 6

References 1. Austin Schultz and Paul Field, prepfast ICP-MS: Environmental, ESI publication, http://www.icpms.com/ products/prepfast.php (accessed June 2017). 2. U.S. EPA Method 200.8 Determination of Trace Elements in Waters and Wastes by ICP-MS, Revision 5.4, 1994. 3. Tetsushi Sakai and Ed McCurdy, Agilent 7900 ICP-MS simplifies drinking water analysis, Agilent application note, 2014, 5991-4938EN. Figure 6. Internal standard recovery plot with Y spiked samples removed. The red lines show the ±20 % control limits. Conclusions The Agilent 7900 ICP-MS, combined with ESI s prepfast M5 autodilution system, simplifies routine elemental analysis by providing a high degree of automation, including: Autocalibration from a single multi-element stock standard. Extended autocalibration using two multi-element standards at different concentrations. Autodilution of samples with ISTD recoveries outside the specified range. Autodilution to ensure that sample results are within a user-defined limit above the top calibration standard. Autodilution if QC limits are exceeded for CCV recoveries. By fully integrating prepfast operation and control from within ICP-MS MassHunter software using a plug-in developed by ESI, autocalibration and autodilution functionality become a part of the method. Eliminating the need for manual dilution of standards and samples reduces sample preparation time, the risk of sample-contamination and the need for re-runs due to QC failures and over-range results. Simplifying sample preparation in this way leads to an increased confidence in the data quality while significantly improving ease-of-use and productivity. Sample throughput is also improved using the discrete-sampling capabilities of prepfast. 7

www.agilent.com/chem Agilent shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for incidental or consequential damages in connection with the furnishing, performance or use of this material. Information, descriptions, and specifications in this publication are subject to change without notice. Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2017 Published July 4, 2017 Publication number: 5991-8148EN