Conservation genetics of the Ozark pocket gopher

Similar documents
NUPP ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY 2018 ARKANSAS STATE WILDLIFE GRANT PRE-PROPOSAL 1

Project Budget: State Wildlife Grant Requested: $16,412 Project Match (UARK in kind services): $5,744 Total Project Cost: $22,156

Title of the Project: Distribution and population status of Arkansas bumble bees

PROJECT PARTNER: PROJECT PARTNER:

Applications of Genetics to Conservation Biology

Conservation Genetics. Outline

The science behind the conservation of endangered species: My experiences with Australian and Japanese bats. Kyle N. Armstrong

Microsatellite data analysis. Tomáš Fér & Filip Kolář

OMICS Journals are welcoming Submissions

WHAT IS BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY?

Lecture 13: Variation Among Populations and Gene Flow. Oct 2, 2006

Curriculum Links. AQA GCE Biology. AS level

PROGRESS REPORT for COOPERATIVE BOBCAT RESEARCH PROJECT. Period Covered: 1 January 31 May Prepared by

Enabling Success in Enterprise Asset Management: Case Study for Developing and Integrating GIS with CMMS for a Large WWTP

Postgraduate teaching for the next generation of taxonomists

CONSERVATION AND THE GENETICS OF POPULATIONS

Population Structure

A Help Guide for Using gssurgo to Find Potential Wetland Soil Landscapes

Amy Driskell. Laboratories of Analytical Biology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, Wash. DC

Project Leader: Project Partners:

Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution

GIS Applications to Museum Specimens

Organizing Life s Diversity

The Avian Perspective

Chesapeake Bay Remote Sensing Pilot Executive Briefing

WEBINAR AGENDA. Review of connectivity mapping progress to date. Describe draft methodology for delineating and validating core areas

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Space Time Population Genetics

Manuscript received September 24, Revised copy received January 09,1974 ABSTRACT

Unit of Study: Genetics, Evolution and Classification

Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat Mapping Study in the Upper and Middle Susitna Basin Study Plan Section 11.5

Grant Opportunity Monitoring Bi-State Sage-grouse Populations in Nevada

SWAT2009_LUC: A TOOL TO ACTIVATE LAND USE CHANGE MODULE IN SWAT 2009

Native species (Forbes and Graminoids) Less than 5% woody plant species. Inclusions of vernal pools. High plant diversity

Multivariate analysis of genetic data an introduction

The role of reproductive timing as a driver of genetic differentiation in populations of Pacific herring

Title: Status, Distribution, and Genetics of Three Arkansas Crayfish: Cambarus causeyi, Procambarus parasimulans, and Orconectes meeki brevis

1. What is the definition of Evolution? a. Descent with modification b. Changes in the heritable traits present in a population over time c.


An Introduction to Day Two. Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning Lakewood, Colorado August 15-16, 16, 2006

Evaluating Physical, Chemical, and Biological Impacts from the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project Cooperative Agreement Number W912HZ

11 major glaciations occurred during the Pleistocene. As glaciers advanced and receded the sea level globally decreased and rose accordingly.

Nebraska Conservation and Environmental Review Tool (CERT): Terminology used in the Tables of the CERT Report

Why the Indian subcontinent holds the key to global tiger recovery

Inbreeding depression due to stabilizing selection on a quantitative character. Emmanuelle Porcher & Russell Lande

Q1) Explain how background selection and genetic hitchhiking could explain the positive correlation between genetic diversity and recombination rate.

MAPPING AND ANALYSIS OF FRAGMENTATION IN SOUTHEASTERN NEW HAMPSHIRE

Development of a Web-Based GIS Management System for Agricultural Authorities in Iraq

An Introduction to NatureServe Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning Phoenix, Arizona November 8 & 9, 2006

Detecting historical population structure among highly impacted White Sturgeon populations of the Upper Columbia River

Lecture 13: Population Structure. October 8, 2012

Modeling Disease Transmission in Long-tailed Macaques on Bali

Introduction to Molecular Evolution (BIOL 3046) Course website:

NEW CONCEPTS - SOIL SURVEY OF THE FUTURE

Investigation 3: Comparing DNA Sequences to Understand Evolutionary Relationships with BLAST

Rate of Evolution Juliana Senawi

STABILIZING SELECTION ON HUMAN BIRTH WEIGHT

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY AND GENETIC DIVERSITY ANALYSIS. Masatoshi Nei"

Licensed Science Officer Benchmark

1. PURPOSE 2. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

Project Title: Eleven Point River Streambank Erosion Assessment

Prereq: Concurrent 3 CH

AEC 550 Conservation Genetics Lecture #2 Probability, Random mating, HW Expectations, & Genetic Diversity,

MEMGENE package for R: Tutorials

PLANT BIOLOGY (PBIO) Plant Biology (PBIO) 1

Amira A. AL-Hosary PhD of infectious diseases Department of Animal Medicine (Infectious Diseases) Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Assiut

Readings Lecture Topics Class Activities Labs Projects Chapter 1: Biology 6 th ed. Campbell and Reese Student Selected Magazine Article

The neutral theory of molecular evolution

Introduction to Biosystematics - Zool 575

- point mutations in most non-coding DNA sites likely are likely neutral in their phenotypic effects.

Chapter 17: Population Genetics and Speciation

Plant Names and Classification

Unit 7: Evolution Guided Reading Questions (80 pts total)

Phylogeography and genetic differentiation between Loxigilla noctis and L. barbadensis in the Lesser Antilles

CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION. Habitat fragmentation, or the subdivision of once-continuous tracts of habitat into

Quantitative Trait Variation

Name: Hour: Teacher: ROZEMA. Inheritance & Mutations Connected to Speciation

Biology Assessment. Eligible Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills

United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Northeast Region

STAAR Biology: Assessment Activities. Biological Evolution and Classification. The Charles A. Dana Center at The University of Texas at Austin

Arkansas Retiree In-Migration: A Regional Analysis

OVERVIEW. L5. Quantitative population genetics

Biodiversity and sustainability of grasslands

Ph ylogeography. A guide to the study of the spatial distribution of Seahorses. By Leila Mougoui Bakhtiari

CONGEN Population structure and evolutionary histories

ADVANCED PLACEMENT BIOLOGY

2012 Assessment Report. Biology Level 3

Resolving habitat classification and structure using aerial photography. Michael Wilson Center for Conservation Biology College of William and Mary

How small can isolated brook trout populations become and still respond to environmental change?

2004 Report on Roadside Vegetation Management Equipment & Technology. Project 2156: Section 9

Louisiana Transportation Engineering Conference. Monday, February 12, 2007

Assessing state-wide biodiversity in the Florida Gap analysis project

Multivariate analysis of genetic data: an introduction

Figure 1. Consider this cladogram. Let s examine it with all three species concepts:

Beetles (Coleoptera: Histeridae and Scarabaeidae) from previously unsampled populations of pocket gopher burrows in Louisiana

Coastal Response Research Center. Nancy Kinner University of New Hampshire (UNH) Michele Jacobi NOAA ORR. September 27, 2007

Warm-Up- Review Natural Selection and Reproduction for quiz today!!!! Notes on Evidence of Evolution Work on Vocabulary and Lab

BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:6

Assessing Michigan s Biological diversity. Michigan Natural Features Inventory MSU Extension

EVOLUTION UNIT. 3. Unlike his predecessors, Darwin proposed a mechanism by which evolution could occur called.

Transcription:

Conservation genetics of the Ozark pocket gopher Project Summary The Ozark pocket gopher (Geomys bursarius ozarkensis) is a range-restricted subspecies of the broadly distributed plains pocket gopher (G. bursarius) with documented populations only in Izard Co., Arkansas. The goal of this study is to assess the genetic diversity and divergence of the Ozark pocket gopher in order to guide conservation priorities and future management decisions. Specific objectives include: 1. To determine its genetic uniqueness (and taxonomic validity) of the Ozark pocket gopher 2. To determine levels of connectivity among regions of documented occurrence 3. To assess levels of genetic diversity in this small, isolated subspecies Project Leader Russell Pfau, PhD Professor Department of Biological Sciences Tarleton State University Stephenville TX 76402 pfau@tarleton.edu 254-968-9761 Project Partner Matthew Connior Bentonville, AR mconnior@nwacc.edu Project Budget SWG amount requested: $28,858 Match: $10,100 Total: $38,958

Project Statement Need The Ozark pocket gopher (Geomys bursarius ozarkensis) is a range-restricted subspecies of the broadly distributed plains pocket gopher (G. bursarius) with documented populations only in Izard Co., Arkansas (Connior and Risch, 2009a; Connior et al., 2010). This isolated population of gophers was documented to be G. bursarius by Elrod et al. (1996) and described as a subspecies by Elrod et al. (2000) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences and cranial morphology. However, the latter study examined only one DNA sequence from each subspecies. Larger sample sizes are required to distinguish between genetic diversity within and among subspecies or populations--a critical component necessary to identify genetic uniqueness worthy of taxonomic recognition and conservation concern. Therefore, there is a need to better understand the genetic uniqueness of this subspecies and to clarify its phylogenetic and phylogeographic affinities with the two nearest subspecies of the plains pocket gopher (G. b. missouriensis and G. b. illinoisensis). Specific locations of occurrence were documented by Connior and Risch (2009a), and I have recently documented additional occurrences by visually identifying mounds from satellite imagery in Google Maps (accessed December 2017; Fig. 1). Based on these occurrence data, it appears that the distribution of the Ozark pocket gopher is not continuous, but consists of multiple, potentially disjunct populations. Herein, I refer to these as populations simply because they appear discontinuous based on the available occurrence data--their status as true, disconnected populations is a hypothesis that I am proposing herein. These hypothesized populations are delimited in Figure 1, and consist of one large and three smaller populations. Three of the four hypothesized populations appear to be largely restricted to narrow, riparian corridors (B, C, and D). The larger one (A) has extensions along corridors, but also has broad areas not closely tied with riparian habitats. These four populations are not connected by riparian corridors, but the potential exists for gene flow between the hypothesized populations because apparently suitable soil habitat exists between documented occurrences (Fig. 1). Using radiotelemetry and drift fences, Connior and Risch (2009a) did not document any instances of long-distance dispersal beyond home range sizes of ~290 m 2. However, radiotelemetry in gophers can only assess dispersal over a portion of an individual s lifespan, and can rarely capture instances of infrequent, long-distance dispersal which may occur only among a few individuals within a population. Such dispersal events also are not likely to be detected by other methods. Infrequent, long-distance dispersal events could be sufficient to maintain genetic connectivity among populations and to allow gophers to recolonize areas from which they have been extirpated (due to natural or human causes). There is a need to document the population genetic structure and level of genetic connectivity within the Ozark pocket gopher in order to better understand the impacts of population extirpation and potential for recolonization. Small populations are subject to genetic drift causing loss of genetic diversity which could potentially lead to inbreeding depression and loss of evolutionary potential. A need exists to compare genetic diversity of the Ozark pocket gopher with the two nearest subspecies of the plains pocket gopher to provide a baseline for monitoring future changes in genetic diversity.

Purpose and Objectives The purpose of this study is to assess the genetic diversity and divergence of the Ozark pocket gopher in order to guide conservation priorities and future management decisions. Specific objectives include: 1. To determine the genetic uniqueness (and taxonomic validity) of the Ozark pocket gopher 2. To determine levels of connectivity among regions of documented occurrence 3. To assess levels of genetic diversity in this small, isolated subspecies Location Izard County, Arkansas (Ozark Highlands; Ozark-Ouachita Riparian and Pasture Land habitats) Approach Population genetic techniques have the potential to shed light on the population structure of the Ozark pocket gopher. Mitochondrial DNA sequencing and multilocus genetic techniques such as microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphisms have been used extensively over the past several decades to assess population structure. With the advent of high-throughput DNA sequencing methods, even more powerful approaches have been developed. Specifically, reduced-representation sequencing, led by RADseq, or restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (Miller et al., 2007) provide a means to obtain data from thousands of nuclear loci across the genome of non-model organisms. The large number of loci assayed increases the statistical power to detect population structure when it exists. My approach will use two genetic methods: mitochondrial DNA sequencing to address Objective 2 and RADseq to address Objectives 1 and 3. Gophers will be live- and kill-trapped (depending on population size and density), with Matthew Connior leading these efforts. For live-trapped gophers, a toe snip will be obtained from the hind foot. For kill-trapped gophers, tissues will be obtained by dissection and the skin, skull, and skeleton will be prepared as vouchers for deposition (along with tissues) into the Texas Tech Natural Science Research Laboratory collection. Live-trapping will be conducted using traps developed by Connior and Risch (2009b) and kill-trapping by standard gopher traps. For comparative purposes, tissue will be subsampled from the two nearest subspecies (G. b. missouriensis and G. b. illinoiensis) from tissues of specimens already in collections (no additional field work necessary). DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (to amplify mitochondrial DNA) will be conducted in my laboratory. DNA sequencing of mitochondrial DNA will be performed by the Genomics Core Lab at Texas A&M University Corpus Christi. Resulting DNA sequences will be analyzed from a phylogenetic and phylogeographic context to determine how divergent the Ozark pocket gopher is from the nearest two subspecies. Preliminary steps for RADseq will be performed in my laboratory. RADseq sequencing libraries will be prepared and sequenced at the Genomics and Bioinformatics Service Laboratory, Texas A&M AgriLife Research Genomics and Bioinformatics Service (College Station, TX). A PyRAD software pipeline will be used to prepare raw data for analysis. The resulting multi-locus genotypes will be used to identify population structure and measure population connectivity

using methods such as STRUCTURE (Pritchard et al., 2000), discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC; Jombart et al., 2010), analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), and FST. Both mitochondrial and RADseq datasets will be used to quantify genetic diversity relative to the nearest two subspecies by measuring haplotype diversity, heterozygosity, and effective number of alleles. Timeline: October 2018 - May 2019: Field work to obtain specimens June - December 2019: Lab work to obtain genetic data January - September 2020: Data analysis and drafting of report Expected Results and Benefits The Ozark pocket gopher is ranked as critically imperiled in Arkansas due to its restricted range and nuisance control by landowners. Previous genetic studies were very limited in scope, only being able to determine that the Izard County population was G. bursarius and not G. breviceps (as occurs elsewhere in the state). Because they did not quantify the genetic uniqueness of this population by taking into account diversity among individuals within the population versus between subspecies, the genetic uniqueness of this subspecies is not well documented. The proposed study will be the first to thoroughly quantify genetic uniqueness of the subspecies, genetic connectivity across its distribution, and genetic diversity within the subspecies. These three results will be important for guiding future conservation decisions. Literature cited available upon request. Budget PI salary and benefits (one month) $13,623 Travel/room/board for PI $1,135 Contracted services for fieldwork (Matthew Connior) $6,000 Wages for student assistants $720 Shipping costs (specimens from Matthew Connior to Russell Pfau) $180 Mitochondrial DNA sequencing (80 individuals) $1,200 RADseq (80 individuals) $6,000 Total SWG amount requested $28,858 Matching funds (35%; includes lab equipment) $10,100 Total amount of project $38,958

Qualifications The project leader has 23 years of experience in the field of population and evolutionary genetics, with a focus on mammals. Recently, two Master s students completed their theses on the population and evolutionary genetics of pocket gophers: Geomys arenarius and Geomys breviceps. These studies are being prepared for submission to peer-reviewed journals. A third project, currently underway, seeks to understand the impacts of population isolation of Geomys bursarius along the Colorado River of Texas. Matthew Connior, project partner, studied the Ozark pocket gopher for his Master s thesis, has extensive hands-on experience with this subspecies, and has developed good relationships with landowners in the area. He has studied pocket gophers throughout Arkansas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Texas, resulting in numerous publications. Figure 1. Occurrence locations and hypothesized populations of the Ozark pocket gopher in Izard County, AR. Open diamonds are occurrences documented by Connior and Risch (2009) and Connior et al. (2010). Closed circles are additional occurrences documented by visually identifying mounds from satellite imagery in Google Maps (accessed December 2017). Gray polygons are named soil types inhabited by gophers based on GIS mapping of mounds (closed circles only) and SSURGO soil classifications.