Design of a Multi-Moon Orbiter

Similar documents
Design of low energy space missions using dynamical systems theory

Design of a Multi-Moon Orbiter. Jerrold E. Marsden

Design of Low Energy Space Missions using Dynamical Systems Theory

14 th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Conference

Connecting orbits and invariant manifolds in the spatial three-body problem

DESIGN OF A MULTI-MOON ORBITER

Dynamical Systems and Space Mission Design

Chaotic Motion in the Solar System: Mapping the Interplanetary Transport Network

Invariant Manifolds, Material Transport and Space Mission Design

Invariant Manifolds and Transport in the Three-Body Problem

Cylindrical Manifolds and Tube Dynamics in the Restricted Three-Body Problem

Dynamical Systems and Space Mission Design

INTERPLANETARY AND LUNAR TRANSFERS USING LIBRATION POINTS

THE ROLE OF INVARIANT MANIFOLDS IN LOW THRUST TRAJECTORY DESIGN

Set oriented methods, invariant manifolds and transport

The Coupled Three-Body Problem and Ballistic Lunar Capture

Periodic Orbits and Transport: Some Interesting Dynamics in the Three-Body Problem

From the Earth to the Moon: the weak stability boundary and invariant manifolds -

Trajectories to the Moons (incl. a trajectory for an Enceladus orbiter)

MULTIPLE GRAVITY ASSISTS IN THE RESTRICTED THREE-BODY PROBLEM

Dynamical system theory and numerical methods applied to Astrodynamics

Periodic Orbits and Transport: From the Three-Body Problem to Atomic Physics

PATHFINDING AND V-INFININTY LEVERAGING FOR PLANETARY MOON TOUR MISSIONS

Low Energy Interplanetary Transfers Using Halo Orbit Hopping Method with STK/Astrogator

Dynamical Systems and Space Mission Design

Exploration of Distant Retrograde Orbits Around Europa AAS

A map approximation for the restricted three-body problem

Multiple Gravity Assists, Capture, and Escape in the Restricted Three-Body Problem

Invariant Manifolds, Spatial 3-Body Problem and Space Mission Design

OPTIMIZATION OF LOW-ENERGY RESONANT HOPPING TRANSFERS BETWEEN PLANETARY MOONS

Lecture D30 - Orbit Transfers

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

TITAN TRAJECTORY DESIGN USING INVARIANT MANIFOLDS AND RESONANT GRAVITY ASSISTS

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Resonance Hopping Transfers Between Moon Science Orbits

INVARIANT MANIFOLDS, DISCRETE MECHANICS, AND TRAJECTORY DESIGN FOR A MISSION TO TITAN

Heteroclinic and Homoclinic Connections Between the Sun-Earth Triangular Points and Quasi-Satellite Orbits for Solar Observations

Dynamical Systems and Control in Celestial Mechanics and Space Mission Design. Jerrold E. Marsden

Design of Low Fuel Trajectory in Interior Realm as a Backup Trajectory for Lunar Exploration

Optimal Titan Trajectory Design Using Invariant Manifolds and Resonant Gravity Assists. Final Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship Report

What is the InterPlanetary Superhighway?

Earth-Mars transfers with ballistic escape and low-thrust capture

SUN INFLUENCE ON TWO-IMPULSIVE EARTH-TO-MOON TRANSFERS. Sandro da Silva Fernandes. Cleverson Maranhão Porto Marinho

Chaotic transport through the solar system

EXPLORATION OF DISTANT RETROGRADE ORBITS AROUND EUROPA

A Study of the Close Approach Between a Planet and a Cloud of Particles

Research Article Application of Periapse Maps for the Design of Trajectories Near the Smaller Primary in Multi-Body Regimes

Halo Orbit Mission Correction Maneuvers Using Optimal Control

Optimal Gravity Assisted Orbit Insertion for Europa Orbiter Mission

Low-Energy Earth-to-Halo Transfers in the Earth Moon Scenario with Sun-Perturbation

Swing-By Maneuvers for a Cloud of Particles with Planets of the Solar System

Earth-to-Halo Transfers in the Sun Earth Moon Scenario

Analysis for the Earth Escape Strategy Using Unstable Manifolds of Sun-Earth Halo Orbit and Lunar Gravity Assists

The Law of Ellipses (Kepler s First Law): all planets orbit the sun in a

Earth-to-Moon Low Energy Transfers Targeting L 1 Hyperbolic Transit Orbits

COMPARISON OF LOW-ENERGY LUNAR TRANSFER TRAJECTORIES TO INVARIANT MANIFOLDS

Identifying Safe Zones for Planetary Satellite Orbiters

Interplanetary Travel

Initial Condition Maps of Subsets of the Circular Restricted Three Body Problem Phase Space

Heteroclinic connections between periodic orbits and resonance transitions in celestial mechanics

JOVIAN ORBIT CAPTURE AND ECCENTRICITY REDUCTION USING ELECTRODYNAMIC TETHER PROPULSION

Dynamical Systems, the Three-Body Problem

Interplanetary Trajectory design for Rosetta and Solar Orbiter

Interplanetary Mission Analysis

OPTIMIZATION OF SPACECRAFT TRAJECTORIES: A METHOD COMBINING INVARIANT MANIFOLD TECHNIQUES AND DISCRETE MECHANICS AND OPTIMAL CONTROL

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.

Earth-to-Moon Low Energy Transfers Targeting L 1 Hyperbolic Transit Orbits

LOW-COST LUNAR COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION

Optimized Three-Body Gravity Assists and Manifold Transfers in End-to-End Lunar Mission Design

Dynamical Systems, the Three-Body Problem and Space Mission Design

Barcelona, Spain. RTBP, collinear points, periodic orbits, homoclinic orbits. Resumen

Connecting orbits and invariant manifolds in the spatial restricted three-body problem

TRANSFER ORBITS GUIDED BY THE UNSTABLE/STABLE MANIFOLDS OF THE LAGRANGIAN POINTS

ESA s Juice: Mission Summary and Fact Sheet

Massimiliano Vasile, Stefano Campagnola, Paolo Depascale, Stefano Pessina, Francesco Topputo

A SURVEY OF BALLISTIC TRANSFERS TO LOW LUNAR ORBIT

HOW TO FIND SPATIAL PERIODIC ORBITS AROUND THE MOON IN THE TBP *

TISSERAND-LEVERAGING TRANSFERS

TRANSFER TO THE COLLINEAR LIBRATION POINT L 3 IN THE SUN-EARTH+MOON SYSTEM

Lagrangian Coherent Structures in the Elliptic Restricted Three-body Problem and Space Mission Design

AN ASSESSMENT OF MULTIPLE SATELLITE-AIDED CAPTURE AT JUPITER

ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS TWO SYNODIC PERIOD EARTH-MARS CYCLER TRAJECTORIES

ORBITAL CHARACTERISTICS DUE TO THE THREE DIMENSIONAL SWING-BY IN THE SUN-JUPITER SYSTEM

ONE CLASS OF IO-EUROPA-GANYMEDE TRIPLE CYCLERS

Interplanetary Trajectory Design using Dynamical Systems Theory

OPTIMAL MANEUVERS IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL SWING-BY TRAJECTORIES

Space Travel on a Shoestring: CubeSat Beyond LEO

AIAA Calculation of Weak Stability Boundary Ballistic Lunar Transfer Trajectories

ABOUT COMBINING TISSERAND GRAPH GRAVITY-ASSIST SEQUENCING WITH LOW-THRUST TRAJECTORY OPTIMIZATION

Interplanetary Mission Opportunities

ASTRIUM. Interplanetary Path Early Design Tools at ASTRIUM Space Transportation. Nathalie DELATTRE ASTRIUM Space Transportation.

Patch Conics. Basic Approach

ORBITS WRITTEN Q.E. (June 2012) Each of the five problems is valued at 20 points. (Total for exam: 100 points)

Problem Description for the 6 th Global Trajectory Optimisation Competition. Anastassios E. Petropoulos 1

A note on weak stability boundaries

A study of trajectories to the Neptune system using gravity assists

Science Scenario Modeling

Previous Lecture. Approximate solutions for the motion about an oblate planet: The Brouwer model. The Cid- Lahulla model 2 / 39

Rigorous Global Optimization of Impulsive Space Trajectories

Electrodynamic Tether at Jupiter 1. Capture operation and constraints

Transcription:

C C Dynamical A L T E C S H Design of a Multi-Moon Orbiter Shane D. Ross Control and Dynamical Systems and JPL, Caltech W.S. Koon, M.W. Lo, J.E. Marsden AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting Ponce, Puerto Rico February 9-13, 2003

Interplanetary Mission Design Use natural dynamics for fuel efficiency Dynamical channels connect planets and moons. Trajectory generation using invariant manifolds in the 3-body problem suggests new numerical algorithms for interplanetary missions Current research importance Design fuel efficient interplanetary trajectories (1) Multi-Moon Orbiter to multiple Jovian moons (2) Earth orbit to lunar orbit 2

Mission to Europa Motivation: Oceans and life on Europa? There is international interest in sending a scientific spacecraft to orbit and study Europa. 3

Multi-Moon Orbiter Orbit each moon in a single mission Other Jovian moons are also worthy of study All may have oceans, evidence from Galileo suggests 5

Multi-Moon Orbiter We propose a trajectory design procedure which uses little fuel and allows a single spacecraft to orbit multiple moons Orbit each moon for much longer than the quick flybys of previous missions Using a standard patched-conics approach, the V necessary would be prohibitively high By decomposing the N-body problem into 3-body problems and using the natural dynamics of the 3-body problem, the V can be lowered significantly 6

Multi-Moon Orbiter First attempt: A Ganymede-Europa Orbiter was constructed V of 1400 m/s was half the Hohmann transfer Gómez, Koon, Lo, Marsden, Masdemont, and Ross [2001] Maneuver performed Jupiter Ganymede's orbit Europa's orbit 0.02 z 1.5 1 0.5 Close approach to Ganymede y 0-0. 5-1 -1. 5-1. 5-1 (a) -0. 5 0 x 0.5 1 1.5 Injection into high inclination orbit around Europa 0.01 0.015 0.01 0.005 0.005 z 0-0.005 z 0-0.01-0.015-0.005-0.02 0.02 0.01 y 0-0.01-0.02 0.98 0.99 1 x 1.01 1.02-0.01 0.99 0.995 x 1 1.005 1.01-0.01-0.005 0 y 0.005 0.01 (b) (c) 7

Multi-Moon Orbiter Refinement Preceding V of 1400 m/s for the Ganymede-Europa orbiter was half the Hohmann transfer (that is, using patched conics, as in manned moon missions) Desirable to decrease V further one now does not directly tube-hop, but rather makes more refined use of the phase space structure New things: resonant gravity assists with the moons Interesting: still fits well with the tube-hopping method 32

Multi-Moon Orbiter Second attempt: Desirable to decrease V further One can consider using resonant gravity assists with the moons, leading to ballistic captures Consider the following tour of Jupiter s moons Begin in an eccentric orbit with perijove at Callisto s orbit, achievable using a patched-conics trajectory from the Earth to Jupiter Orbit Callisto, Ganymede, and Europa 8

Multi-Moon Orbiter V = 22 m/s, but flight time is a few years Low Energy Tour of Jupiter s Moons Seen in Jovicentric Inertial Frame Callisto Ganymede Europa Jupiter 9

Multi-Moon Orbiter Results are promising This result is preliminary Model is a restricted bicircular 5-body problem A user-assisted algorithm was necessary to produce it An automated algorithm is a future goal Future challenges The flight time is too long; should be reduced below 18 months Evidence to be presented later in this talk suggests that a significant decrease in flight time can be gained for a modest increase in V Radiation dose is not accounted for; will be included in future models 10

Construction Procedure Building blocks Patched three-body model: linking two adjacent three-body systems Inter-moon transfer: decreasing Jovian energy via resonant gravity assists Orbiting each moon: ballistic capture and escape Small impulsive manuevers: to steer spacecraft in sensitive phase space We will give some background on these issues 11

Inter-Moon Transfer Spacecraft gets a gravity assist from outer moon M 1 when it passes through apoapse if near a resonance When periapse close to inner moon M 2 s orbit is reached, it takes control ; this occurs for ellipse E Leaving moon M 1 Approaching moon M 2 Apoapse A fixed Periapse P fixed 15

Inter-Moon Transfer Small impulsive maneuvers are performed at opposition Exterior Realm Forbidden Realm Semimajor Axis vs. Time a+ S/C J L 1 M Interior Realm L 2 Spacecraft Maneuvers Performed When Opposite Moon a a a+ Moon Realm 16

Inter-Moon Transfer The transfer between three-body systems occurs when energy surfaces intersect; can be seen on semimajor axis vs. eccentricity diagram (similar to Tisserand curves of Longuski et al.) Spacecraft jumping between resonances on the way to Europa 0.3 Spacecraft path 0.25 eccentricity 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 Curves of Constant 3 Body Energy within each system 0 E G C 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 semimajor axis (a Europa = 1) 17

Ballistic Capture An L 2 orbit manifold tube leading to ballistic capture around a moon is shown schematically Escape is the time reverse of ballistic capture 18

Why Does It Work? Recall the planar circular restricted three-body problem: motion of a spacecraft in the gravitational field of two larger bodies in circular motion. View in rotating frame = constant energy E Forbidden Realm (at a particular energy level) Exterior Realm Poincare section spacecraft Interior (Jupiter) Realm L 1 L 2 Moon Realm Rotating frame: different realms of motion at energy E. 19

Poincaré Surface of Section Study Poincaré surface of section at fixed energy E, reducing system to a 2-dimensional area preserving map. z P(z) Poincaré surface of section 20

Poincaré Surface of Section Poincaré section reveals mixed phase space structure: KAM tori and a chaotic sea are visible. Identify Semimajor Axis (Neptune = 1) Argument of Periapse (radians) Poincaré surface of section 21

Transport in Poincaré Section Phase space divided into regions R i, i = 1,..., N R bounded by segments of stable and unstable manifolds of unstable fixed points. R 2 q 1 q 4 q 2 R 1 B 12 = U [p 2,q 2 ] U S [p 1,q 2 ] q 5 p 2 p 3 p 1 q 3 R 3 R 4 q 6 R 5 22

Lobe Dynamics Transport btwn regions computed via lobe dynamics. L 2,1 (1) R 2 q 0 f (L 1,2 (1)) f -1 (q 0 ) q 1 p i L 1,2 (1) f (L 2,1 (1)) p j R 1 23

Movement btwn Resonances We can compute manifolds which naturally divide the phase space into resonance regions. Identify Semimajor Axis Argument of Periapse Unstable and stable manifolds in red and green, resp. 24

Movement btwn Resonances Transport and mixing between regions can be computed. Identify R 3 Semimajor Axis R 2 R 1 Argument of Periapse Four sequences of color coded lobes are shown. 25

Movement btwn Resonances Navigation from one resonance to another, essential for the Multi-Moon Orbiter, can be performed. Identify Semimajor Axis Resonance Region B } R 3 }R 2 Resonance Region A }R 1 Argument of Periapse 26

Resonances and Tubes Resonances and tubes are linked It has been observed that the tubes of capture (resp., escape) orbits are coming from (resp., going to) certain resonances. Resonances are a function of energy E and the mass parameter µ Koon, Lo, Marsden, Ross [2001] 27

Earth to Moon Trajectories Similar methods can be applied to near-earth space to study the V verses time trade-off 68

Earth to Moon Trajectories Results: much shorter transfer times than previous authors for only slightly more V Trajectories from a circular Earth orbit (r=59669 km) to a stable lunar orbit 1300 1200 Hohmann transfer V = 1220 m/s TOF = 6.6 days 1100 V (m/s) 1000 900 Present Work 800 Bollt & Meiss [1995] Schroer & Ott [1997] 700 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Time of Flight (days) 39

Earth to Moon Trajectories Compare with Bollt and Meiss [1995] A tenth of the time for only 100 m/s more Current Result Bollt and Meiss [1995] 65 days, V = 860 m/s 748 days, V = 750 m/s TOF = 65 days V = 860 m/s 1 Day Tick Marks Earth Moon 40

e.g., GEO to Lunar Orbit GEO to Moon Orbit Transfer Seen in Geocentric Inertial Frame TOF = 63 days V = 1211 m/s 1 Day Tick Marks Moon s Orbit Earth 41

References Trade-Off Between Fuel and Time Optimization, in preparation. Koon, W.S., M.W. Lo, J.E. Marsden and S.D. Ross [2002] Constructing a low energy transfer between Jovian moons. Contemporary Mathematics 292, 129 145. Gómez, G., W.S. Koon, M.W. Lo, J.E. Marsden, J. Masdemont and S.D. Ross [2001] Invariant manifolds, the spatial three-body problem and space mission design. AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference. Koon, W.S., M.W. Lo, J.E. Marsden & S.D. Ross [2001] Resonance and capture of Jupiter comets. Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy 81(1-2), 27 38. Koon, W.S., M.W. Lo, J.E. Marsden and S.D. Ross [2000] Heteroclinic connections between periodic orbits and resonance transitions in celestial mechanics. Chaos 10(2), 427 469. For papers, movies, etc., visit the websites: http://www.cds.caltech.edu/ marsden http://www.cds.caltech.edu/ shane 27