Analytical classical dynamics

Similar documents
High-Order Hamilton s Principle and the Hamilton s Principle of High-Order Lagrangian Function

The Noether theorem. Elisabet Edvardsson. Analytical mechanics - FYGB08 January, 2016

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. D Alembert s Principle and The Lagrangian-1

Canonical transformations

Classical Mechanics Symmetry and Conservation Laws

Mechanics Physics 151

Lagrangian Field Theory

Quantum Mechanics I Problem set No.1

Integrals and Invariants of Euler-Lagrange Equations

Poisson brackets and canonical transformations

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Calculus of Variations II

Lecture 20: Noether s Theorem

PHZ 6607 Lecture Notes

Yukawa Potential and the Propagator Term

Mechanics Physics 151

Lagrange Multipliers. A Somewhat Silly Example. Monday, 25 September 2013

Mechanics Physics 151

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Principle of Virtual Work-1

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformation II

Calculus of Variations Basics

Classical Field Theory

A particle in a state of uniform motion remain in that state of motion unless acted upon by external force.

10. Canonical Transformations Michael Fowler

Integrals and Invariants of

12. The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation Michael Fowler

p(z) = 1 a e z/a 1(z 0) yi a i x (1/a) exp y i a i x a i=1 n i=1 (y i a i x) inf 1 (y Ax) inf Ax y (1 ν) y if A (1 ν) = 0 otherwise

Module 1 : The equation of continuity. Lecture 1: Equation of Continuity

ENGI9496 Lecture Notes Multiport Models in Mechanics

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Newtonian Mechanics

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Hamilton-Jacobi Equation

Notes on Analytical Dynamics

On the First Integrals of KdV Equation and the Trace Formulas of Deift-Trubowitz Type

Module 3: Element Properties Lecture 1: Natural Coordinates

On a one-parameter family of Riordan arrays and the weight distribution of MDS codes

NMT EE 589 & UNM ME 482/582 ROBOT ENGINEERING. Dr. Stephen Bruder NMT EE 589 & UNM ME 482/582

Chapter 2 Transformations and Expectations. , and define f

CHAPTER 14 GENERAL PERTURBATION THEORY

Mechanics Physics 151

Physics 106a, Caltech 11 October, Lecture 4: Constraints, Virtual Work, etc. Constraints

ON MECHANICS WITH VARIABLE NONCOMMUTATIVITY

Lecture 6/7 (February 10/12, 2014) DIRAC EQUATION. The non-relativistic Schrödinger equation was obtained by noting that the Hamiltonian 2

Three views of mechanics

MA209 Variational Principles

4. Laws of Dynamics: Hamilton s Principle and Noether's Theorem

Classical Mechanics ( Particles and Biparticles )

Homework & Solution. Contributors. Prof. Lee, Hyun Min. Particle Physics Winter School. Park, Ye

coordinates. Then, the position vectors are described by

Physics 181. Particle Systems

Mathematical Preparations

LECTURE 8-9: THE BAKER-CAMPBELL-HAUSDORFF FORMULA

ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION IN A CONTINUOUS MEDIUM

The universal Lagrangian for one particle in a potential

1 What is a conservation law?

Comparative Studies of Law of Conservation of Energy. and Law Clusters of Conservation of Generalized Energy

The non-negativity of probabilities and the collapse of state

LAGRANGIAN MECHANICS

The Feynman path integral

Snce h( q^; q) = hq ~ and h( p^ ; p) = hp, one can wrte ~ h hq hp = hq ~hp ~ (7) the uncertanty relaton for an arbtrary state. The states that mnmze t

Point symmetries of the Euler Lagrange equations

The generating function of a canonical transformation

Bernoulli Numbers and Polynomials

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

Finslerian Nonholonomic Frame For Matsumoto (α,β)-metric

Large-Scale Data-Dependent Kernel Approximation Appendix

In this section is given an overview of the common elasticity models.

HW #6, due Oct Toy Dirac Model, Wick s theorem, LSZ reduction formula. Consider the following quantum mechanics Lagrangian,

Classical Mechanics Virtual Work & d Alembert s Principle

Quadratic invariants and multi-symplecticity of partitioned Runge-Kutta methods for Hamiltonian PDEs

Classical Mechanics. Jung Hoon Han

8.323 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory I

1 Derivation of Rate Equations from Single-Cell Conductance (Hodgkin-Huxley-like) Equations

A how to guide to second quantization method.

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Transfer Functions. Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: ( ) system

CHAPTER 6. LAGRANGE S EQUATIONS (Analytical Mechanics)

ON A DETERMINATION OF THE INITIAL FUNCTIONS FROM THE OBSERVED VALUES OF THE BOUNDARY FUNCTIONS FOR THE SECOND-ORDER HYPERBOLIC EQUATION

Multi-Time Euler-Lagrange Dynamics

Elementary work, Newton law and Euler-Lagrange equations

2-π STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED TO THE LAGRANGIAN MECHANICAL SYSTEMS UDC 531.3: (045)=111. Victor Blãnuţã, Manuela Gîrţu

A new Approach for Solving Linear Ordinary Differential Equations

Salmon: Lectures on partial differential equations. Consider the general linear, second-order PDE in the form. ,x 2

Spin-rotation coupling of the angularly accelerated rigid body

THE VIBRATIONS OF MOLECULES II THE CARBON DIOXIDE MOLECULE Student Instructions

Field and Wave Electromagnetic. Chapter.4

Army Ants Tunneling for Classical Simulations

THEOREMS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

Marginal Effects in Probit Models: Interpretation and Testing. 1. Interpreting Probit Coefficients

A NUMERICAL COMPARISON OF LANGRANGE AND KANE S METHODS OF AN ARM SEGMENT

Iterative General Dynamic Model for Serial-Link Manipulators

Bézier curves. Michael S. Floater. September 10, These notes provide an introduction to Bézier curves. i=0

Section 8.3 Polar Form of Complex Numbers

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

Ch. 7 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics Homework Problems 7-3, 7-7, 7-15, 7-16, 7-17, 7-18, 7-34, 7-37, where y'(x) dy dx Δ Δ Δ. f x.

Review of Newtonian Mechanics

A MULTIDIMENSIONAL ANALOGUE OF THE RADEMACHER-GAUSSIAN TAIL COMPARISON

(Online First)A Lattice Boltzmann Scheme for Diffusion Equation in Spherical Coordinate

Open Systems: Chemical Potential and Partial Molar Quantities Chemical Potential

Uniqueness of Weak Solutions to the 3D Ginzburg- Landau Model for Superconductivity

CHAPTER 5 NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE

Bezier curves. Michael S. Floater. August 25, These notes provide an introduction to Bezier curves. i=0

Transcription:

Analytcal classcal ynamcs by Youun Hu Insttute of plasma physcs, Chnese Acaemy of Scences Emal: yhu@pp.cas.cn Abstract These notes were ntally wrtten when I rea tzpatrck s book[] an were later revse to a more contents. Generalze coornates or a ynamcal system wth egrees of freeom, the Cartesan coornates can be expresse n terms of generalze coornates (q,q 2,,q, x =x (q,q 2,.,q,t, for,, ( 2 Generalze force The work on a ynamcal system when ts Cartesan coornates change by δx s gven by δw = δx = x δq = = x δq = = = Q δq, where Q s efne by Q = x, (2 whch s calle generalze force. or conservatve system, can be wrtten n the form Usng Eq. (3, the generalze force s wrtten as = U x. (3 Q = U x x = U. (4 3 Euler-Lagrange equaton Newton s secon law s wrtten as m ẍ =. (5

2 Secton 3 Usng we obtan ẋ = x t + x q, (6 = ẋ q I = x, (7 where the partal ervatve on the left-han se s taken by holng q,, q constant (ths conventon s mportant for ervng the Euler-Lagrange equaton. Multplyng Eq. (7 by mẋ an summng over, we obtan ẋ m ẋ = x m ẋ. (8 q I Takng tme fferental, the above equaton s wrtten as ẋ m ẋ = x m ẋ t q I t (9 The left-han se of Eq. (9 s wrtten as ẋ m ẋ t q I = 2 t 2 m ẋ q I = t q I 2 m 2 ẋ = ( K t q I, (0 where K m 2 ẋ 2 s the knetc energy. The rght-han se of Eq. (9 s wrtten as x m ẍ + m t ( x Usng Newton s secon law, the above expresson s wrtten as x + m t ( x ẋ. ( ẋ, (2 whch can be further wrtten as, by usng the efnton of the generalze force, Q I + m t ( x ẋ. (3 In orer to smplfy the secon term n expresson (3, we try to prove that x = ẋ, (4 t where the partal ervatve wth respect to q I on the rght-han se s taken by holng q, q 2,.,q constant. [Proof: The rght-han se of the above equaton s wrtten as ẋ = x t + x q = = x t + x q, (5 =

Prove that Euler-Lagrange equaton s coornates nepenent 3 In obtanng the last equalty, we have use the fact that the orer of the partal ervatve of x wth respect to q, q I, an t s nterchangeable. The rght-han se of Eq. (5 can be further wrtten as t ( x + = ( x q, (6 whch s obvously the total tme ervatve of x /,..e., x, (7 t whch s exactly the left-han se of Eq. (4. Thus Eq. (4 s prove.] Usng Eq. (4, the expresson (3 s wrtten as whch can be further wrtten as.e., Thus we obtan Q I + m ẋ ẋ, Q I + 2 2 m ẋ, Q I + K (8 K =Q I + K. t q I (9 If the generalze force s gven by Eq. (4, equaton (9 s wrtten as K = U + K. (20 t q I Defne L=K U (2 an notng that U s nepenent of q,q, q, Eq. (20 s wrtten as L = L, (22 t q I whch s the Euler-Lagrange equaton, where, recallng the remarks below Eqs. (7 an (4, we know that the partal ervatve wth respect to q I an q I are taken by treatng q an q, respectvely, as nepenent varables. Defne the canoncal momentum then the Euler-Lagrange equaton s wrtten as p I = L q İ, (23 t (p I= L. (24 4 Prove that Euler-Lagrange equaton s coornates nepenent Try to use L = L, (25 t ẋ x where x are rectangular coornates, to prove that L = L. (26 t q

4 Secton 5 where q are arbtrary generalze coornates. Proof: The left-han se of Eq. (26 s wrtten as ( L = L x + t q t x q ( = 0+ L ẋ t ẋ q = L ẋ t ẋ q = [ L ẋ t ẋ q Usng Eq. (25, the above equaton s wrtten as ( L t q Usng the fact that Eq. (29 s wrtten as Usng the fact that t = ( L q t = L ẋ ẋ q + L ẋ t [ L ẋ + L x q ẋ t ( ẋ = ẋ ] ẋ q ] ẋ q (27 (28 (29. (30 ] (3 q [ L ẋ + L ẋ x q ẋ ẋ q Eq. (3 s further wrtten as L = t q.e., whch s what we want. t = x (32 [ L x + L ] ẋ x ẋ = L, (33 ( L q = L, (34 5 Usng Euler-Lagrange equaton to erve Hamlton s equaton The Euler-Lagrange equaton s gven by wth p I efne by t (p I= L, (35 p I = L q İ, (36 The Lagrangan L s efne as the fference of the knetc energy an the potental energy of the system,.e., L=K U. (37 In the Euler-Lagrange equaton, the nepenent varables are chosen to be q an q wth =, 2, where s the freeom of the system,.e., L=L(q,q 2, q,q, q Ḟ. (38 Now we use the above results to erve Hamlton s equaton. In Hamlton s equaton the nepenent varables are chosen to be q an p wth =,2,.. The Hamltonan s equal to the total energy of the system,.e. H=K+U. (39

Prove that 2K= p q 5 An the Hamltonan must be expresse as a functon of q an p wth =,2 (.e., t s the total energy expresse n terms of q an p that can be calle Hamltonan. Notng that 2K= p q. (40 (The proof of ths result s gven n Sec. 6, we can obtan the relaton between the Lagrangan an Hamltonan L+H= p q. (4 Snce the nepenent varables n Hamlton s equaton are q an p, thus the q shoul be vew as a functon of general coornates an general momentum,.e., q =q (q,q 2, q,p,p 2, p. (42 Unerstanng ths epenence, we can take the fferental of Eq. (4 wth respect to p I, whch gves (usng the chan rule L + L + H = p +q İ. (43 Notng that q an p are nepenent varables, thus / = 0, the above equaton s wrtten as 0+ L + H = p +q İ. (44 Notng the efnton of the general momentum, the two summaton terms cancel each other, we are left wth q İ = H, (45 whch s the frst Hamlton s equaton. Smlarly, we take the fferental of Eq. (4 wth respect to q I, whch gves L + L + H = q p. (46 q Notng the efnton of the general momentum, the two summaton terms cancel each other, we are left wth L = H. (47 Usng the Euler-Lagrange equaton (35, the above equaton s wrtten whch s the secon Hamlton s equaton. p İ = H, 6 Prove that 2K = p q To prove that 2K= p q. (48 Proof: Usng the efnton of the generalze momentum p, the rght-han se of the above equaton s wrtten as p q = L q q. (49

6 Secton 8 Notng that L=K U, where the potental U s nepenent of q, Eq. (49 s wrtten as p q = Usng the efnton of the knetc energy, Eq. (50 s wrtten as Usng the fact that Eq. (5 s wrtten as p q = = = p q = K q. (50 m 2 2 ẋ q 2 2 m ẋ q q ẋ m ẋ q q. (5 ẋ = x, (52 = m ẋ x q m ẋ x q (53 If the coornates transformaton x =x (q,, q,t oes not explctly epens on t,.e., x = x (q,,q, then the above equaton s wrtten as p q = m ẋ ẋ = 2K (54 Thus Eq. (48 s prove. 7 Varatonal prncple The ervaton of Lagrange s equaton gven n the last secton starts wth Newton s law. The ervaton can also starts wth a varatonal prncple. Defne the acton ntegral t 2 J = Lt, (55 Then the acton prncple says that the equaton of moton s gven by t δj =0. (56 rom Eq. (56, we can erve the Euler-Lagrange equaton L = L (57 t q I 8 el theory not fnshe Generally speakng, the Lagrangan of a ynamcal system s a functon that summarzes the ynamcs of the system. Moern formulatons of classcal fel theores ten to be expresse by usng Lagrangan. The Lagrangan s a functon that, when subecte to an acton prncple, gves rse to the fel equatons an a conservaton law for the theory.

Noether s theorem not fnshe 7 The Lagrangan n many classcal systems s a functon of generalze coornates q an ther veloctes q. These coornates (an veloctes are, n turn, parametrc functons of tme. In the classcal vew, tme s an nepenent varable an (q, q are epenent varables. Ths formalsm was generalze further to hanle fel theory. In fel theory, the nepenent varable s replace by an event n space-tme (x, y,z,t, or more generally by a pont s on a manfol. An the epenent varables q are replace by ϕ, the value of a fel at that pont n space-tme, so that fel equatons are obtane by means of an acton prncple, wrtten as: δs =0. (58 δϕ Lagrangan enstes n fel theory The tme ntegral of the Lagrangan s calle the acton enote by S. In fel theory, a stncton s occasonally mae between the Lagrangan L, of whch the acton s the tme ntegral: S= Lt (59 an the Lagrangan ensty L, whch one ntegrates over all space-tme to get the acton: S[ϕ]= L[ϕ(x] 4 x. (60 The Lagrangan s then the spatal ntegral of the Lagrangan ensty. L=L(ϕ, ϕ, ϕ,,x (6 9 Noether s theorem not fnshe We know that f the Lagrangan s nepenent of a coornate q (.e., q k s a gnorable coornate, the corresponng canoncal momentum p k wll be conserve. The absence of the gnorable coornate q k from the Lagrangan mples that the Lagrangan s unaffecte by a change or transformaton of q k. Ths means the Lagrangan exhbt a symmetry uner the transformaton. Ths s the see ea generalze n Noether s theorem. L=L(q,q 2,,q k, q,q,,q k,.,q,t (62 If there exsts a transformaton q = q (s q = q (s wth =,., an the Lagrangan L s nvarant uner ths transformaton, that s Then t s easy to prove that C efne n the followng s conserve, Proof C t C= L =0. (63 s p q (s s. (64 = q p (s t s = [ q (s p + q ] (s t s s t p = [ q (s p + q ] (s L t s s = [ q (s p + q ] (s L s t s = [ L q q s + q ] (s L s = L s = 0 (65

8 Secton QED. 0 Posson bracket not fnshe Hamlton s equatons are an p İ = H (66 q İ = H. (67 Defne the Posson brackets of two functons f(q,p an g(q,p, {f,g} ( f g f g, (68 p p then Hamlton s equatons are wrtten n symmetrcal form an q İ ={q I,H} (69 p İ ={p I,H}. (70 More generally, for any functon f =f(q,p, we obtan If f explctly epens on tme,.e., f =f(q,p,t, then f ={f,h}. (7 f ={f,h}+ f t. (72 0. Propertes of Posson bracket rom the efnton of the Posson bracket, t s easy to prove that {f,g}= {g,f}, (73 {f,g+h}={f,g}+{f,h}, (74 an {f +h,g}={f,g}+{h,g}, (75 {f,gh}={f,g}h+{f,h}g. (76 Jacob entty for the Posson bracket s (I o not check ths n entty {f,{g,h}}+{g,{h,f}}+{h,{f,g}}=0. (77 Bblography [] Analytcal Classcal Dynamcs. Rchar tzpatrck, 2004. [2] Robert G. Lttleohn. Dfferental forms an canoncal varables for rft moton n toroal geometry. Phys. lus, 28(6:205 206, 985. [3] Shaoe Wang. Canoncal hamltonan theory of the gung-center moton n an axsymmetrc torus, wth the fferent tme scales well separate. Phys. Plasmas, 3(5:052506, 2006.