Generalized Coordinates, Lagrangians

Similar documents
Constrained motion and generalized coordinates

Coordinates, phase space, constraints

Coordinates, phase space, constraints

Electric and Magnetic Forces in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Formalism

REVIEW. Hamilton s principle. based on FW-18. Variational statement of mechanics: (for conservative forces) action Equivalent to Newton s laws!

4.1 Important Notes on Notation

Energy and Equations of Motion

Hamilton s principle and Symmetries

15. Hamiltonian Mechanics

Curves in the configuration space Q or in the velocity phase space Ω satisfying the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equations,

Lecture 4. Alexey Boyarsky. October 6, 2015

Phys 7221, Fall 2006: Midterm exam

Physical Dynamics (PHY-304)

Lagrangian Dynamics: Derivations of Lagrange s Equations

06. Lagrangian Mechanics II

the EL equation for the x coordinate is easily seen to be (exercise)

Classical Mechanics and Electrodynamics

Classical Mechanics Comprehensive Exam Solution

Dynamics of Nonholonomic Systems

B.Sc. (Semester - 5) Subject: Physics Course: US05CPHY01 Classical Mechanics

Classical Mechanics and Electrodynamics

Forces of Constraint & Lagrange Multipliers

Physical Dynamics (SPA5304) Lecture Plan 2018

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformations-1

LAGRANGIAN AND HAMILTONIAN

Analytical Dynamics: Lagrange s Equation and its Application A Brief Introduction

The Particle-Field Hamiltonian

Lecture 19: Calculus of Variations II - Lagrangian

Physics 106a, Caltech 4 December, Lecture 18: Examples on Rigid Body Dynamics. Rotating rectangle. Heavy symmetric top

Part of the advantage : Constraint forces do no virtual. work under a set of virtual displacements compatible

Video 2.1a Vijay Kumar and Ani Hsieh

The Principle of Least Action

Sketchy Notes on Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics

DYNAMICS OF SERIAL ROBOTIC MANIPULATORS

Physics 235 Chapter 7. Chapter 7 Hamilton's Principle - Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Dynamics

Modeling of Electromechanical Systems

Relativistic Dynamics

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics. Final Examination December 17, 2004

The Principle of Least Action

M2A2 Problem Sheet 3 - Hamiltonian Mechanics

Non-holonomic constraint example A unicycle

The Accelerator Hamiltonian in a Straight Coordinate System

Announcements. 1. Do not bring the yellow equation sheets to the miderm. Idential sheets will be attached to the problems.

MSMS Basilio Bona DAUIN PoliTo

Physics 106a, Caltech 16 October, Lecture 5: Hamilton s Principle with Constraints. Examples

Lecture 13: Forces in the Lagrangian Approach

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

ANALYTICAL MECHANICS. LOUIS N. HAND and JANET D. FINCH CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS

In most robotic applications the goal is to find a multi-body dynamics description formulated

[ ] ( ) L = L = r p. We can deal with this more conveniently by writing: so that L becomes: α α α. α α N N N N

Particle collisions and decays

PHY 5246: Theoretical Dynamics, Fall September 28 th, 2015 Midterm Exam # 1

More Examples Of Generalized Coordinates

Lectures on basic plasma physics: Hamiltonian mechanics of charged particle motion

Transverse Linearization for Controlled Mechanical Systems with Several Passive Degrees of Freedom (Application to Orbital Stabilization)

Classical Mechanics. FIG. 1. Figure for (a), (b) and (c). FIG. 2. Figure for (d) and (e).

Chapter 1. Principles of Motion in Invariantive Mechanics

Euler-Lagrange's equations in several variables

Analytical Mechanics for Relativity and Quantum Mechanics

G : Statistical Mechanics

Goldstein Problem 2.17 (3 rd ed. # 2.18)

MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS

PHY 5246: Theoretical Dynamics, Fall November 16 th, 2015 Assignment # 11, Solutions. p θ = L θ = mr2 θ, p φ = L θ = mr2 sin 2 θ φ.

2.3 Calculus of variations

Video 3.1 Vijay Kumar and Ani Hsieh

Dynamics. Basilio Bona. Semester 1, DAUIN Politecnico di Torino. B. Bona (DAUIN) Dynamics Semester 1, / 18

Lecture 9: Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors in Classical Mechanics (See Section 3.12 in Boas)

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 18 Nov 2008

Noether s Theorem. 4.1 Ignorable Coordinates

Kinetic Energy and Work

Lagrange s Equations of Motion and the Generalized Inertia

Physics 6010, Fall Relevant Sections in Text: Introduction

Solving high order nonholonomic systems using Gibbs-Appell method

Central Force Problem

HW 6 Mathematics 503, Mathematical Modeling, CSUF, June 24, 2007

HAMILTON S PRINCIPLE

Buckingham s magical pi theorem

Analytical Dynamics: Lagrange s Equation and its Application A Brief Introduction

2 Canonical quantization

Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics (Symon Chapter Nine)

13.7 Power Applied by a Constant Force

Physics 141 Energy 1 Page 1. Energy 1

1 Lagrangian for a continuous system

Part II. Classical Dynamics. Year

Nonholonomic Constraints Examples

Problem Goldstein 2-12

for changing independent variables. Most simply for a function f(x) the Legendre transformation f(x) B(s) takes the form B(s) = xs f(x) with s = df

ANALYTISK MEKANIK I HT 2014

Columbia University Department of Physics QUALIFYING EXAMINATION

Constraints. Noninertial coordinate systems

Week 1, solution to exercise 2

Theoretical physics. Deterministic chaos in classical physics. Martin Scholtz

Computational Astrophysics

Physics 6010, Fall 2016 Constraints and Lagrange Multipliers. Relevant Sections in Text:

D Alembert s principle of virtual work

Advanced Dynamics. - Lecture 4 Lagrange Equations. Paolo Tiso Spring Semester 2017 ETH Zürich

Deriving Lagrange s Equations Using Elementary Calculus

Adding angular momenta

FINAL EXAM GROUND RULES

Analysis and Control of Multi-Robot Systems. Elements of Port-Hamiltonian Modeling

Transcription:

Generalized Coordinates, Lagrangians Sourendu Gupta TIFR, Mumbai, India Classical Mechanics 2012 August 10, 2012

Generalized coordinates Consider again the motion of a simple pendulum. Since it is one dimensional, use arc length as a coordinate. Since radius is fixed, use the angular displacement, θ, as a generalized coordinate. The equation of motion involves θ, as it should, although the coordinate is dimensionless. Problem 5: Simple pendulum Choose θ as the generalized coordinate for a simple pendulum. What is an appropriate generalized momentum, so that its time derivative is equal to the force? What is the engineering dimension of the generalized momentum. Draw phase space trajectories for the pendulum: periodic motion corresponds to closed trajectories. What is the dimension of the area enclosed by such a trajectory? What is the physical interpretation of this area?

Many particles Following the motion of N particles requires keeping track of N vectors, x 1, x 2,, x N. The configuration space has 3N dimensions; the phase space has 6N dimensions. We say that there are 3N degrees of freedom. Phase space volume has engineering dimension of (energy time) 3N. The equations of motion are x i = p i, m i p i = f i ({x,p}). If these are subject to some non-holonomic constraints, then there is no reduction in the number of degrees of freedom. If there are M scalar equations expressing holonomic constraints, then the number of degrees of freedom reduces to D = 3N M. There is a consequent change in the dimension of phase space and the engineering dimension of phase space volume.

Generalized coordinates If there are M constraints of the form f α (x 1,x 2,,x N ) = 0 with 1 α M, then all the coordinates of the N particles are given in terms of generalized coordinates q i where 1 i D = 3N M. In other words, one has N vector-valued functions x j = x j (q 1,q 2, q D,t). If the generalized coordinates are to provide a complete description of the dynamics then knowledge of all the q k should be equivalent to specifying all the x j. A counting of the number of scalar equations shows that this is possible. Clearly, the velocities are v j = ẋ j = k x j q k + x j t. As a result one has the important identity v j q k = ẋ j q k = x j.

Generalized forces The equations of motion are equivalent to the principle that if one makes an instantaneous virtual displacement of a mechanical system, then the work done by the forces goes into a change of the total kinetic energy. In other words ) δx j (F j ṗ j = 0. j Now one can use the generalized coordinates to rewrite the work done by the forces δw = j δx j F j = jk F j x j δq k = k Q k δq k, where one has defined the generalized forces Q k = j F j x j.

The change in kinetic energy One can write m j ẍ j δx j = j k = k = k = k δq k j δq k { m j j m j v j x j ( ) } d x dt v j v j v j j δq k d v j m j v j dt q k j j [ ( ) d T δq k T ] dt q k v j m j v j

Equation of motion Since the virtual displacements of the generalized coordinates are all independent, one can set each coefficient independently to zero. Then we have ( ) d T T = Q k. dt q k If the particles move in a field of conservative forces then Q k = V and V q k = 0. Then the equations of motion can be written in terms of the Lagrangian function L = T V, ( ) d L L = 0. dt q k

The Euler-Lagrange equations of motion The generalized momenta are defined as p k = L q k. One recovers the usual definition for systems where the velocities appear only in the kinetic part of the energy. Similarly, if one considers the kinds of systems where the coordinates only appear in the potential, then d dt ( ) L q k = L implies ṗ k = Q k. The Euler-Lagrange equations reduce to the usual form of Newton s equations of motion in these cases. Interesting generalizations arise in other cases.

Particle in an electromagnetic field The Lorentz force on a particle in an electromagnetic field is F = q (E+ 1c ) ( v B = q φ 1 A c t + 1 ) c v A, where q = charge, c = speed of light, v the velocity, E and B the electric and magnetic fields, and φ and A the scalar and vector potentials. The Lagrangian formalism continues to be useful if one can write down a velocity dependent potential V(q, q) such that Q = d ( ) V V dt q q. Now using the identity v A = (v A)+ A t da dt, one finds that V = q(φ v A/c) gives the Lorentz force.

Dissipation The problem of dissipative forces lies a little away from the developments made till now. However, models of frictional forces show that they are proportional to the velocity. Hence, for the dissipative forces on a body one may write the relation Q = F q. This introduces the Rayleigh term, F( q), which is usually chosen to be quadratic in q. The equations of motion are then written as ( ) d L L dt q q + F q = 0. In order to describe the motion of a body in a dissipative environment both the Lagrangian L and the Rayleigh term F need to be specified.

Keywords and References Keywords engineering dimensions, conservative forces, configuration space, degrees of freedom, virtual displacement, generalized coordinates, generalized forces, generalized momenta, Lagrangian function, Lorentz force, Rayleigh term References Goldstein, chapter 1.