Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of congestion pricing

Similar documents
First-Best Dynamic Assignment of Commuters with Endogenous Heterogeneities in a Corridor Network

Morning Commute with Competing Modes and Distributed Demand: User Equilibrium, System Optimum, and Pricing. Eric J. Gonzales and Carlos F.

Anticipatory Pricing to Manage Flow Breakdown. Jonathan D. Hall University of Toronto and Ian Savage Northwestern University

On the global stability of departure time user equilibrium: A Lyapunov approach

First-Best Dynamic Assignment of Commuters with Endogenous Heterogeneities in a Corridor Network

CONGESTION TOLLING AND URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE. Richard Arnott. Department of Economics. Boston College. Chestnut Hill, MA U.S.A.

A cork model for parking

Using Piecewise-Constant Congestion Taxing Policy in Repeated Routing Games

PROBING A TRAFFIC CONGESTION CONTROVERSY: A COMMENT*

The dynamics of urban traffic congestion and the price of parking

Congestion Externality and Autonomous Vehicles

Congestion in a city with a central bottleneck

Real-Time Congestion Pricing Strategies for Toll Facilities

A SIMPLIFIED MODEL OF URBAN RAILWAY SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT

1.225 Transportation Flow Systems Quiz (December 17, 2001; Duration: 3 hours)

arxiv: v1 [cs.gt] 16 Jul 2012

Lecture 19: Common property resources

Decentralisation and its efficiency implications in suburban public transport

The morning commute in urban areas with heterogeneous trip lengths. ISTTT22, Northwestern University Raphaël Lamotte, Nikolas Geroliminis

Cumulative Count Curve and Queueing Analysis

Dynamic Traffic Modeling: Approximating the equilibrium for peak periods in urban areas. LUTS, EPFL April 2015

Mapping Accessibility Over Time

CEE 320 Midterm Examination (50 minutes)

A Model of Traffic Congestion, Housing Prices and Compensating Wage Differentials

Parking Slot Assignment Problem

CURBSIDE PARKING TIME LIMITS *

Dynamic Pricing, Managed Lanes and Integrated Corridor Management: Challenges for Advanced Network Modeling Methodologies

Surge Pricing and Labor Supply in the Ride- Sourcing Market

Endogenous scheduling preferences and congestion 1

Queueing Systems: Lecture 6. Lecture Outline

Reducing Congestion Through Information Design

Parking Space Assignment Problem: A Matching Mechanism Design Approach

A Model of Rush-Hour Traffic Dynamics in an Isotropic Downtown Area

Course Outline Introduction to Transportation Highway Users and their Performance Geometric Design Pavement Design

The curse of the first-in-first-out queue discipline

Pareto-Improving Congestion Pricing on General Transportation Networks

URBAN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (ASSIGNMENT)

Traffic Games Econ / CS166b Feb 28, 2012

How to Estimate, Take Into Account, and Improve Travel Time Reliability in Transportation Networks

Departure Time and Route Choices with Bottleneck Congestion: User Equilibrium under Risk and Ambiguity

AGlimpseofAGT: Selfish Routing

Do new transit lines necessarily improve user cost in the transit system? DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES DPS15.15

The effects of public transportation on urban form

Metrolinx Transit Accessibility/Connectivity Toolkit

Financing Urban Transport. UNESCAP-SUTI Event

Cyber-Physical Cooperative Freight Routing System

UC Berkeley Working Papers

Random queues and risk averse users

Strategic Games: Social Optima and Nash Equilibria

SPACE-TIME ACCESSIBILITY MEASURES FOR EVALUATING MOBILITY-RELATED SOCIAL EXCLUSION OF THE ELDERLY

Foreword. Vision and Strategy

2.1 Traffic Stream Characteristics. Time Space Diagram and Measurement Procedures Variables of Interest

Feedback Based Dynamic Congestion Pricing

CIV3703 Transport Engineering. Module 2 Transport Modelling

Game Theory: Spring 2017

TIME DEPENDENT CORRELATIONS BETWEEN TRAVEL TIME AND TRAFFIC VOLUME ON EXPRESSWAYS

A New Look at the Two-Mode Problem. Marvin Kraus *

Optimal Adaptive Routing and Traffic Assignment in Stochastic Time-Dependent Networks. Song Gao

Fundamental Characteristics of Urban Transportation Services

INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS

The Economics of Crowding in Public Transport

Supplementary Technical Details and Results

Leveraging Urban Mobility Strategies to Improve Accessibility and Productivity of Cities

Theoretical premises of the Keynesian approach

Lagrangian road pricing

Analysis and Design of Urban Transportation Network for Pyi Gyi Ta Gon Township PHOO PWINT ZAN 1, DR. NILAR AYE 2

Pareto-improving toll and subsidy scheme on transportation networks

SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC INDICATORS FOR REGIONAL POPULATION POLICIES

TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY ON EXPRESSWAY NETWORK UNDER UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT OF SNOWFALL AND TRAFFIC REGULATION

Estimating Transportation Demand, Part 2

MS&E 246: Lecture 17 Network routing. Ramesh Johari

A Paradox on Traffic Networks

Network Equilibrium Models: Varied and Ambitious

2.2t t 3 =1.2t+0.035' t= D, = f ? t 3 dt f ' 2 dt

The Corridor Problem

Forecasts from the Strategy Planning Model

Homework 1 - SOLUTION

Congestion Equilibrium for Differentiated Service Classes Richard T. B. Ma

OD-Matrix Estimation using Stable Dynamic Model

c) What are cumulative curves, and how are they constructed? (1 pt) A count of the number of vehicles over time at one location (1).

A dynamic tra c equilibrium assignment paradox

Pre-trip Information and Route-Choice Decisions with Stochastic Travel Conditions: Theory

Tradable Permits for System-Optimized Networks. Anna Nagurney Isenberg School of Management University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003

SECOND-BEST CONGESTION PRICING AND USER HETEROGENEITY IN STATIC TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS

A control strategy to prevent propagating delays in high-frequency railway systems

Manchester City Region: The case for agglomeration economies. Steve Gibbons Henry Overman Alessandra Tucci

A Review of Auction Theory: Sequential Auctions and Vickrey Auctions

Public Transport Versus Private Car: GIS-Based Estimation of Accessibility Applied to the Tel Aviv Metropolitan Area

Dynamic Atomic Congestion Games with Seasonal Flows

Realistic Commuting. Marcus Berliant. April 2016 Preliminary and Incomplete Comments Welcome. Abstract

When is the concept of generalized transport costs useless? The effects of the change in the value of time

Publication List PAPERS IN REFEREED JOURNALS. Submitted for publication

BROOKINGS May

Journal of Urban Economics

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 9, Issue 6, June ISSN

Manipulable Congestion Tolls

Power-Law Congestion Costs: Minimal Revenue (MR) Pricing and the Braess Paradox

Designing Cross-Subsidy Mechanisms for Multi-Modal Transportation Systems

Street mobility and network accessibility: towards tools for overcoming barriers to walking amongst older people

SOME FACTORS INFLUENCING THE REGULARITY OF SHORT HEADWAY URBAN BUS OPERATION*

Transcription:

Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of congestion pricing Tokyo Institute of Technology Postdoctoral researcher Katsuya Sakai 1

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Method/Tool (Previous studies) 1. Equilibrium 2. Route choice equilibrium 3. Departure time choice equilibrium 1. Without toll 2. With toll 3. Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of tradable bottleneck permits (My study) 1. Solution procedure 2. Numerical example 4. Welfare effect analysis (My study) 1. Input 2. Result 5. Conclusion 2

Problems of congestion wasting a lot of resources Time Energy Mental health 3

How congestion occurs? caused by a concentration of demand At a location origin destination During short period Demand rate Time of day 4

How to eliminate congestion? distributing the concentrated demand At a location origin destination During short period Demand rate Time of day 5

Congestion management Information provision Congestion length Travel time Physical control (quantitative control) Ramp metering Advance booking Economic approach (pricing control) Congestion charging Tradable bottleneck permits 6

Congestion management Approach Advantages Limitations Information provision Quantitative control Pricing control Travel time can be reduced Total travel time can be minimized Social cost can be minimized Total travel time cannot be minimized Social cost cannot be minimized Equity problem; poor people may suffer a loss Focusing on pricing control (economic approach) - Tradable bottleneck permits (TBP) scheme 7

Tradable bottleneck permits scheme (Akamatsu et al. 2006) 1. Road administrators issue a right that allows a permit holder to pass through the bottleneck at a pre-specified time period ( bottleneck permits ). 2. A new auction market is established for bottleneck permits differentiated by a prespecified time. As a result of auction, toll is determined by each commuter s willingness to pay (value-pricing) Under the toll, social cost is minimized 8

Equity problem of congestion charging The Welfare Effects of Congestion Tolls with Heterogeneous Commuters (Arnott et al., 1994) The poor suffer a loss The rich get a benefit 9

Suggestion Applying congestion pricing only a portion of road (lanes). Drivers can choose paying or not paying Free Toll How much portion should be charging lanes? Don t the poor suffer a loss? 10

How to evaluate pricing scheme? Comparing equilibrium states before/after pricing applied, we can know the effect of congestion pricing. Equilibrium BEFORE pricing - Commuter s travel cost - Social cost Equilibrium AFTER pricing - Commuter s travel cost - Social cost Need to calculate equilibrium 11

Objective To formulate the departure time choice equilibrium problem and to solve it when the TBP scheme is partially applied. To examine the welfare effect of partial congestion pricing with heterogeneous commuters. 12

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Method/Tool (Previous studies) 1. Equilibrium 2. Route choice equilibrium 3. Departure time choice equilibrium 1. Without toll 2. With toll 3. Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of tradable bottleneck permits (My study) 1. Solution procedure 2. Numerical example 4. Welfare effect analysis (My study) 1. Input 2. Result 5. Conclusion 13

What is equilibrium? The most realizable state. At equilibrium, nobody can improve their travel cost by unilaterally changing their behavior. Equilibrium 14

What is equilibrium? Route choice equilibrium (Wardrop, 1952) The journey times on all the routes actually used are equal, and less than those which would be experienced by a single vehicle on any unused route. Departure time choice equilibrium (Vickrey, 1969) Times => costs Routes => departure time 15

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Method/Tool (Previous studies) 1. Equilibrium 2. Route choice equilibrium 3. Departure time choice equilibrium 1. Without toll 2. With toll 3. Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of tradable bottleneck permits (My study) 1. Solution procedure 2. Numerical example 4. Welfare effect analysis (My study) 1. Input 2. Result 5. Conclusion 16

Route choice equilibrium (Wardrop, 1952) Both routes are used Travel time of two routes must be same Either of routes is used Travel time of used road must be smaller or at most equal to that of the unused road. 17

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Method/Tool (Previous studies) 1. Equilibrium 2. Route choice equilibrium 3. Departure time choice equilibrium 1. Without toll 2. With toll 3. Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of tradable bottleneck permits (My study) 1. Solution procedure 2. Numerical example 4. Welfare effect analysis (My study) 1. Input 2. Result 5. Conclusion 18

Departure time choice problem (Vickrey, 1969) Focusing on morning peak hour (commute) problem Employing bottleneck model, we simply describe traffic congestion one-to-one network with a single bottleneck Demand: N Origin Destination (Demand rate) > = < (Capacity) 19

Departure time choice equilibrium Travel cost / Demand rate (Vickrey, 1969) Travel cost Demand rate Time of day Time without demand Time with demand Time without demand 20

Departure time choice equilibrium Travel cost / Demand rate (Vickrey, 1969) What is travel cost? Travel cost How to determine? Demand rate Time of day Time without demand Time with demand Time without demand 21

Departure time choice equilibrium (Vickrey, 1969) Defining travel cost with tradeoff between waiting and schedule delays. Waiting cost Schedule cost Toll cost Value of time home Driving In working hour office out of working hour γ β α TC: travel cost w: waiting delay α: marginal cost of waiting delay β: marginal cost of early arrival γ: marginal cost of late arrival t 0 : desired arrival time t: actual arrival time 22

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Method/Tool (Previous studies) 1. Equilibrium 2. Route choice equilibrium 3. Departure time choice equilibrium 1. Without toll 2. With toll 3. Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of tradable bottleneck permits (My study) 1. Solution procedure 2. Numerical example 4. Welfare effect analysis (My study) 1. Input 2. Result 5. Conclusion 23

Equilibrium conditions without toll Departure (arrival) time choice equilibrium condition; if 0 if 0 Demand-supply equilibrium condition; if 0 if 0 Flow conservation Non-negativity constraint 0 TC : travel cost : equilibrium travel cost q : demand rate μ : bottleneck capacity w : waiting delay : total demand 24

How to solve equilibrium problem? Solving the equivalent optimization problem (Iryo and Yoshii, 2007) Minimizing total schedule cost (waiting-time base) KKT conditions are equal to the original problem *It is also possible to analytically solve the equilibrium problem. 25

Equilibrium solution without toll Cumulative # of Vehicles N A(t) D(t) Cost TC t 0 Time of day $ #! " # t 0 Time of day 26

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Method/Tool (Previous studies) 1. Equilibrium 2. Route choice equilibrium 3. Departure time choice equilibrium 1. Without toll 2. With toll 3. Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of tradable bottleneck permits (My study) 1. Solution procedure 2. Numerical example 4. Welfare effect analysis (My study) 1. Input 2. Result 5. Conclusion 27

Equilibrium conditions with toll (TBP) Departure (arrival) time choice equilibrium condition; % if 0 % if 0 Demand-supply equilibrium condition; if % 0 if % 0 Flow conservation Non-negativity constraint 0 TC : travel cost : equilibrium travel cost p : price of bottleneck permits q : demand rate μ : bottleneck capacity p : price of TBP N : total demand 28

Equivalent optimization problem Minimizing total schedule cost (monetary base) *It is also possible to analytically solve the equilibrium problem. 29

Cumulative # of Vehicles Equilibrium solution with TBP N A(t) D(t) Cost s t TC ' # t 0 f t Time of day $ # s t t 0 f t Time of day 30

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Method/Tool (Previous studies) 1. Equilibrium 2. Route choice equilibrium 3. Departure time choice equilibrium 1. Without toll 2. With toll 3. Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of tradable bottleneck permits (My study) 1. Solution procedure 2. Numerical example 4. Welfare effect analysis (My study) 1. Input 2. Result 5. Conclusion 31

Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of tradable bottleneck permits Problem including departure time choice and lane (route) choice problem Commuter heterogeneity Value of time (waiting delay cost) Flexibility of job (schedule delay cost) route 1 (without TBP) µ (1) O µ D O route 2 (with TBP) µ (2) D 32

Equilibrium conditions Departure (arrival) time and route choice equilibrium condition; ()* if ()* 0 ()* if ()* 0 +, Demand-supply equilibrium condition in route 1; - (-* if 0 - - if 0 Demand-supply equilibrium condition in route 2;.. if % 0.. if % 0 Flow conservation Non-negativity constraint ) ) ()* 0 +, 33

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Method/Tool (Previous studies) 1. Equilibrium 2. Route choice equilibrium 3. Departure time choice equilibrium 1. Without toll 2. With toll 3. Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of tradable bottleneck permits (My study) 1. Solution procedure 2. Numerical example 4. Welfare effect analysis (My study) 1. Input 2. Result 5. Conclusion 34

How to solve? No equivalent optimization problem Dividing the problem into 3 parts Departure time choice Equilibrium in route 1: LP optimization problem Route assignment problem Departure time choice Equilibrium in route 2: LP optimization problem N k route 1 (without TBP) µ (1) N (1) k O route 1 (without TBP) µ (1) D O route 2 (with TBP) µ (2) D N k (2) O route 2 (with TBP) µ (2) D 35

Solution algorithm start input parameters and variables N k,α k, β k, γ k, µ (1), µ (2) route assignment x k Solving departure time choice equilibrium in each route (1-x k )N k, α k, β k, γ k, µ (1) x k N k, β k, γ k, µ (2) departure time choice equilibrium in route 1 departure time choice equilibrium in route 2 q (1) k(t), w(t), ρ k TC k (1) q (2) k(t), p(t), π k TC k (2) Route choice equilibrium condition discriminant of route choice equilibrium No TC TC TC (1) k (1) k (1) k < TC = TC > TC (2) k (2) k (2) k if if if x 0 < x x k k = 0 k = 1 < 1 k Yes output variables q (1) k(t), q (2) k(t), w(t), p(t), U k end TC k 36

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Method/Tool (Previous studies) 1. Equilibrium 2. Route choice equilibrium 3. Departure time choice equilibrium 1. Without toll 2. With toll 3. Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of tradable bottleneck permits (My study) 1. Solution procedure 2. Numerical example 4. Welfare effect analysis (My study) 1. Input 2. Result 5. Conclusion 37

Input Bottleneck capacity: μ=100 veh/min Capacity without toll: μ (1) =40 veh/min Capacity with toll: μ (2) =60 veh/min Model inputs N k (veh) t 0 α k (USD/min) β k (USD/min) γ k (USD/min) k=1 1000 8:50 0.25 0.20 0.30 k=2 2000 9:10 1.00 0.10 0.20 k=3 3000 9:00 0.50 0.15 0.40 38

Convergence to equilibrium 1 0.5 group 1 group 2 group 3 0 0 10 20 30 Iteration Rate of choosing route 2 (Buying bottleneck permits) 39

Convergence to equilibrium Route 1 (without toll) Route 2 (with toll) 15 Travel cost in route 1 (USD) 10 5 0 0 10 20 30 Iteration group 1 group 2 group 3 Travel cost in route 2 (USD) 10 5 0 0 10 20 30 Iteration group 1 group 2 group 3 40

Equilibrium state Waiting delay Price of TBP Waiting delay (min) 15 10 5 0 8:20 8:30 8:40 8:50 9:00 9:10 9:20 9:30 Time of day Price of bottleneck permit (USD) 6 4 2 0 8:20 8:30 8:40 8:50 9:00 9:10 9:20 9:30 Time of day 41

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Method/Tool (Previous studies) 1. Equilibrium 2. Route choice equilibrium 3. Departure time choice equilibrium 1. Without toll 2. With toll 3. Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of tradable bottleneck permits (My study) 1. Solution procedure 2. Numerical example 4. Welfare effect analysis (My study) 1. Input 2. Result 5. Conclusion 42

Welfare effect analysis Examining changes in commuter s route choice and travel cost. Partial pricing (ρ=90%) Full pricing (ρ=100%) All of commuters need to buy TBP Partial pricing (ρ=10%) No pricing (ρ=0%) No commuters need to buy TBP 43

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Method/Tool (Previous studies) 1. Equilibrium 2. Route choice equilibrium 3. Departure time choice equilibrium 1. Without toll 2. With toll 3. Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of tradable bottleneck permits (My study) 1. Solution procedure 2. Numerical example 4. Welfare effect analysis (My study) 1. Input 2. Result 5. Conclusion 44

Welfare effect analysis Input Commuter s heterogeneity in value of time and flexibility of job (Job flexibility) Flexible Inflexible (value of time) δ=0.20 δ=0.80 Poor α=0.20 [Group 1] [Group 2] Rich α=1.00 [Group 3] [Group 4] δ: flexibility of job (δβ/α) β/γ assumed constant q k (veh) t 0 α k (USD/min) δ β k (USD/min) γ k (USD/min) k=1 1000 9:00 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.08 k=2 1000 9:00 0.20 0.80 0.16 0.32 k=3 1000 9:00 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.40 k=4 1000 9:00 1.00 0.80 0.80 1.60 45

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Method/Tool (Previous studies) 1. Equilibrium 2. Route choice equilibrium 3. Departure time choice equilibrium 1. Without toll 2. With toll 3. Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of tradable bottleneck permits (My study) 1. Solution procedure 2. Numerical example 4. Welfare effect analysis (My study) 1. Input 2. Result 5. Conclusion 46

Change in route choice 1 Rate of choosing route 2 (Buying bottleneck permits) 0.5 0 Flexible Inflexible Poor group 1 group 2 Rich group 3 group 4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 TBP implementation rate group 1 group 2 group 3 group 4 47

Change in travel cost 15 Equilibrium travel cost (USD) 10 5 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 TBP implementation rate Flexible Inflexible Poor group 1 group 2 Rich group 3 group 4 group 1 group 2 group 3 group 4 48

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Method/Tool (Previous studies) 1. Equilibrium 2. Route choice equilibrium 3. Departure time choice equilibrium 1. Without toll 2. With toll 3. Departure time choice equilibrium problem with partial implementation of tradable bottleneck permits (My study) 1. Solution procedure 2. Numerical example 4. Welfare effect analysis (My study) 1. Input 2. Result 5. Conclusion 49

Conclusions Equilibrium problem under partial TBP implementation Welfare effect of partial congestion pricing scheme Possibility of congestion pricing scheme harming nobody even if the toll revenues are not refunded Future works To prove uniqueness of equilibrium point 50

References Arnott, R. J.; de Palma, A. & Lindsey, R. The Welfare Effects of Congestion Tolls with Heterogeneous Commuters Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath and The London School of Economics and Political Science, 1994, 28, 139-161. Iryo, T. and Yoshii, T., Equivalent optimization problem for finding equilibrium in the bottleneck model with time choices, in Mathematics in Transport, B.G. Heydecker (Ed.), 2007, Elsevier: Oxford. 231-244. Vickrey, W. S. Congestion Theory and Transport Investment The American Economic Review, 1969, 59, 251-260 Wardrop, J. G. Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1952, 1, 325-362. 51