Downtown Chattanooga Parking Study Guide to August 2017 Public Meeting Materials

Similar documents
City of Hermosa Beach Beach Access and Parking Study. Submitted by. 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA

DOWNTOWN SUB-AREA. Final Parking Study. Prepared for: City of Bellingham. March Prepared by:

Attachment A. Page 1 of 15

REQUEST FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST RETAIL OPPORTUNITIES GEORGE R. BROWN CONVENTION CENTER GREATER HOUSTON PARTNERSHIP BUILDING HOUSTON, TEXAS

GRB QUICK REFERENCE: Contact Information.

MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015

Downtown Parking Study

WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS

Trip and Parking Generation Study of Orem Fitness Center-Abstract

APPENDIX I: Traffic Forecasting Model and Assumptions

III. FORECASTED GROWTH

[Leveraging & Improving Neighborhood Connections] Area E Cedar Creek

NATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Table of Contents

King City URA 6D Concept Plan

St. Mary s County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Article 5. REGULATION OF USES. Schedule 50.4 Use Classifications. Legend

Neighborhood Locations and Amenities

North Easton Village Parking Study. Final Report

River Realty Services Commercial

CITY OF CEDAR FALLS D O W N T O W N PA R K I N G S T U D Y P U B L I C W O R K S H O P D E C E M B E R 5,

River North Multi-Modal Transit Analysis

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

East Bay BRT. Planning for Bus Rapid Transit

MEMORANDUM. Trip Generation Analysis

Welcome to the City of Raleigh from ParkLink, the City s Parking Program

CLAREMONT MASTER PLAN 2017: LAND USE COMMUNITY INPUT

KEY: R-1 Low Density Residential. R-2 Medium Density Residential. R-3 High Density Residential. S-C Service Commercial. D-C Downtown Commercial

ZONING. 195 Attachment 1

Artist Information. June 18, :00 AM 5:00 PM

California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study. Jim Daisa, P.E.

Guidelines on Using California Land Use/Transportation Planning Tools

Trip Generation Characteristics of Super Convenience Market Gasoline Pump Stores

Trip to National Weather Service & NASA Thursday, June 12, by Claude Cox and Mike Kees

Study Overview. the nassau hub study. The Nassau Hub

ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS. Table 4-2 Permitted Uses by Zoning Districts Use Types AG RR R-1 R-2 R-3 MH LC CC DC GC LI GI P Addl Reg

ARTICLE 8. USES 8.0 GENERAL USE PERMISSION 8.1 USE MATRIX 8.2 PRINCIPAL USE STANDARDS 8.3 TEMPORARY USE STANDARDS

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

Parking Study MAIN ST

INVITATION TO NEGOTIATE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT OF CITY- OWNED SITES WITH PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENT PARTICIPATION

Complete Bicycle Network Project Prioritization

Local Economic Activity Around Rapid Transit Stations

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY

Alternatives Analysis Report

Zoning Ordinance. Requirements Used Districts R1 R2 R2.6 R3 R4 R5 B1 B2 B3 B4 M1 M2 RH Density Low Low Med Med High High Gen Local CBD Local LT Hvy Ag

Attachment E: CADP Design Shadow Analysis

Town of Davie B-2 (Community Business) Zoning:

NEW WATERFRONT METROPARK. P u b l i c O p e n H o u s e, J u n e 2 1,

2129 NORTH MAIN STREET HOTE PROJECT ULI SHARED PARKING STUDY City of Santa Ana, California

An amazing location, many reasons to stay.

Jordan Harrison, Planner III, San Francisco Recreation and Park Department

Wiarton Revitalization Committee (WRC) Supporting Economic Opportunities for our Town

Land Use and Zoning Page 1 of 10 LAND USE AND ZONING

The Attractive Side of Corpus Christi: A Study of the City s Downtown Economic Growth

Night Comes to the Cumberlands and It s Awesome: Promoting Night Sky Conservation and Development in the Upper Cumberland

Trip Generation Study: A 7-Eleven Gas Station with a Convenience Store Land Use Code: 945

Attachment 3. Updating UBC s Regional Context Statement. University of British Columbia CONSIDERATION MEMORANDUM OF CONSULTATION INPUT

Market Street PDP. Nassau County, Florida. Transportation Impact Analysis. VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Nassau County Growth Management

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 4B10

where vibrancy and value INTERSECT

DOWNTOWN DELAWARE PARKING STUDY February 6, 2017

VHD Daily Totals. Population 14.5% change. VMT Daily Totals Suffolk 24-hour VMT. 49.3% change. 14.4% change VMT

I. M. Schoeman North West University, South Africa. Abstract

New Partners for Smart Growth: Building Safe, Healthy, and Livable Communities Mayor Jay Williams, Youngstown OH

Trip Generation Model Development for Albany

Parking areas in all zoning districts shall comply with the following standards:

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

2014 Data Collection Project ITE Western District

ST. ELIZABETHS EAST CAMPUS PARKING MASTER PLAN STUDY

Com munity Advisor y C ommitte e Meeting

15.0 Operations and Maintenance Cost Calculations

TABLE OF USE REGULATIONS

Foreword. Vision and Strategy

ArcGIS Urban: An Introduction. Lisa Staehli ArcGIS Urban Team Product Development Brooks Patrick ArcGIS Urban Team Business Development

FOR SALE +/- 419 ACRES ¼ Mile South of Alliance Airport

RE: Existing and Future Parking Demand Analysis St. Joseph Center Expansion

INTRODUCTION PURPOSE DATA COLLECTION

CHANGES IN THE STRUCTURE OF POPULATION AND HOUSING FUND BETWEEN TWO CENSUSES 1 - South Muntenia Development Region

Downtown Bozeman Parking Study

Kitsap County 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update. Appendix A: Growth Estimates

HARPETH SQUARE

Density and Walkable Communities

GIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line

Urban White Paper on Tokyo Metropolis 2002

Regional Transit Development Plan Strategic Corridors Analysis. Employment Access and Commuting Patterns Analysis. (Draft)

Application #: TEXT

Recovery Renewal Rebuilding

HALFF 16196? TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN. Richardson ISD Aikin Elementary School Dallas, Texas North Bowser Road Richardson, Texas 75081

Economic Activity Economic A ctivity

Data driven approaches to Urban Planning Experience from Derry/Londonderry

CITY OF CAMBRIDGE Growth & Intensification Study Secondary Plan Stakeholder Session June 26th, 2017

CITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY

NON-RESIDENTIAL LIGHT MANUFACTURING ZONE DISTRICT (NR-LM)

Figure 8.2a Variation of suburban character, transit access and pedestrian accessibility by TAZ label in the study area

Prepared for: San Diego Association Of Governments 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92101

Tornado Safety: 2013 Practical Steps for Weather-Related Emergencies

Traffic Impact Study

Transportation Statistical Data Development Report OKALOOSA-WALTON OUTLOOK 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Home Owners. Age Male/Female. Snow removal for his/her driveway or private property

Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 2010 to 2050

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:

September 13, 2018 MEDIA RELEASE. Waynesboro Department of Emergency Management Waynesboro Police Department Waynesboro Fire Department

Transcription:

Guide to August 17 Public Meeting Materials The Downtown Chattanooga ing Study is a comprehensive study effort for all public and private parking in central downtown Chattanooga, and it seeks to collect current parking information, look ahead to estimate future parking need, and develop strategic recommendations for how to manage and potentially expand current parking resources. The study is led by River City Company and the Chattanooga ing Authority/Chattanooga Area Regional Transit Authority (CARTA), working with a consultant team led from Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates. The study s current status Most inventory and utilization counts as well as most analysis is complete, and the consultant team has begun developing recommendations. None of these recommendations are finalized. In partnership with the City of Chattanooga, the team hosted a public open house on August 2, 17 to share findings and hear feedback from those who were interested. Presentation of findings The series of display boards that accompany this summary was presented at the August open house. This guide is intended to explain them to those who were not able to attend the open house. The study area is divided into seven subareas, similar to the generally accepted downtown districts, and these subareas make the representation of data more comprehensible. These smaller areas also relate to most Chattanoogans current parking behavior and expectations. Each of the subareas includes three slides, describing the following information: ing inventory: the current supply of parking and where is it (i.e. onstreet, lots, garages). ing utilization: when is parking being used at different times of the day? Supplydemand balance: how much parking is being used compared to the demand. The following three pages explain how to interpret the information on each of the three slides for each subarea, using one of the districts (City Center North) as an example and explaining why the information is important. Study Subareas Riverfront City Center North City Center South Southside UTC ML King Health & Ed The study s recommendations The purpose of the study is to identify strategies and actions for the City, River City, CARTA and other partners to take to address parking needs and identify current opportunities. Although these recommendations are not finalized, the study team has observed patterns and conditions that point to particular strategies that might be effective. It is important to note that the study team is driven be a philosophy of managing current resources most effectively before recommending new parking being constructed, especially when most areas of downtown have available space during most times of the day. ing is costly to build and requires continued funding to make it possible, and there are lowercost, lower effort opportunities that Chattanooga may be able to use to meet its parking needs. The study s next steps The study team has developed early recommendations, and they are currently in the process of finalizing these ideas with input from stakeholders and agency partners. The study will be finished in fall 17.

Inventory Board Downtown Chattanooga ing Study City Center North Downtown Chattanooga s business core, which also includes attractions such as Memorial Auditorium and the Tivoli Theater. This is the singlelargest subarea inventory in the overall downtown parking study area, with over a quarter of all downtown parking in this subarea alone. ing Inventory What this board contains: The maps illustrate both the onstreet and offstreet parking supply, colorcoded by type. On the offstreet parking map, the numbers indicate how many spaces are in each highlighted garage or lot. The table provides a detailed breakdown of the parking inventory. The highlighted rows of onstreet and offstreet parking represent the breakdown of total spaces, and the detailed rows under these show how each onstreet and offstreet spaces are broken down by different categories. Why this information is important: Greater Downtown Chattanooga has over parking spaces and is a complex puzzle of private, public, onstreet and offstreet parking. It is important to see the full breakdown of parking in each of the study s subareas to see what s available and to whom it is available. Riverfront Pkwy ing Inventory (Supply) OnStreet W Aquarium Way W 3rd St Boynton Chestnut St St Broad Broad St St W 6th St Pine Pine St St W 5th St W 7th St Tivoli Theater E th St W th St Martin Cherry St St ONSTREET PARKING TYPES No ing Free, Unregulated Free, Min ing Free, 1Hr ing Free, 2 Hour ing Free, Restricted Use Metered, Min Meters Metered, 2 Hour ing Metered, Hour ing Carter St Walnut Walnut St St Market St St Convention and Trade Center Lookout St St E 6th St Luther King Blvd W th St W th St Miller Georgia Ave Memorial Auditorium Patten Pkwy Broad St Lindsay St E th St E th St Market Market St St OffStreet (numbers of spaces indicated for each facility) 1 1 2 2 2 3 2 1 0 600 2 22 61 00 1 6 37 0 1 00 1 00 Oak St W Aquariu W 3rd St 5 172 Boynton 51 5 6 Chestnut St St 2 77 6 Broad Broad St St 60 0 3 W 6th St Pine Pine St St 3 7 7 W 5th St 0 5 0 61 6 26 Tivoli Theater 5 W 7th St E th St 10 Cherry St St 17 W th St Martin 75 Walnut Walnut St St 2 2 OFFSTREET PARKING TYPES Employees Only Employees and Customers Customers / Guests Only Permit & Event ing Reserved Residence Only Valet Open / Public 56 Market St St 1 6 Convention and Trade Center Lookout St St E 6th St 0 707 32 326 W th St 5 Luther King Blvd W th St 1 62 17 Miller Georgia Ave 66 3 3 61 Memorial Auditorium 3 66 77 Patten Pkwy Broad St 67 7 1 5 2 65 65 1 1 7 Lindsay St 5 5 21 0 0 E th St E th St 50 1 71 2 7 1 2 6 17 17 1 3 Market Market St St 55 O ing Facility Type Number of Spaces Percentage of Spaces TOTAL SPACES,35 0% ONSTREET 1,05 % 2Hour Meters 756 6.0% No ing.6% Truck Loading 7 7.2% Bus Stops 17 1.6% Unregulated 1.% OFFSTREET, 1% Open to the Public 5,75 51.0% Reserved Spaces 1,.5% Customers Only 7 7.0% Employees Only 2,2 21.5% Employees and Customers 617 5.5% Major ing Facilities in this district: Unum Garages ( spaces total) Liberty Garage (77 spaces) County Garage (707 spaces) Tallen Garage (6 spaces) Volunteer Garage (5 spaces) EPB Garage (5 spaces)

Utilization Board Downtown Chattanooga ing Study City Center North ing Utilization What this board contains: The maps illustrate how parking is used throughout the day. The study has counted parking use on a typical weekday and on a Saturday. Most of the seven subareas counted parking every two hours. The top row is the weekday count while the bottom row is the Saturday counts (on some boards, weekday maps are on the left side and weekend maps are on the right side). The text in between these maps guides readers through patterns that were observed. The degree to which the district s parking is used throughout the day is driven by its employment focus: parking is much busier than weekday business hours than at other times. Weekday Utilization (Thursday) 7 am am am am am 1 pm 1 pm 3 pm 3 pm 5 pm 5 pm 7 pm Early morning parking activity is focused on hotels and other uses with overnight demand especially on weekends. Later into the weekday, many lots and garages are much closer to full, though little is exceeding functional capacity. On weekends, much of the Rates of Utilization The highest parking use rates are in the core business district, and they include both onstreet and offstreet parking. Although weekend parking is more heavily 0% to % % to 60% 60% to 0% 0% to 0% 0% to 0% Over 0% Onstreet parking remains busy in the late afternoon on weekdays. Even on weekends when overall parking demand is lower, some onstreet Onstreet parking remains busy in the late afternoon on weekdays. Even on weekends when overall parking demand is lower, some onstreet Utilization declines substantially in the evenings, even though some onstreet locations and select offstreet lots remain in high use. Why this information is important: Chattanooga has not had a comprehensive study showing how existing parking is used throughout the day. This is useful to guide decisionmaking around actual data and helps to show how the balance of supply and demand is different throughout downtown. Weekend Utilization (Saturday) 7 am am am am am 1 pm 1 pm 3 pm 3 pm 5 pm 5 pm 7 pm Rates of Utilization 0% to % % to 60% 60% to 0% 0% to 0% 0% to 0% Over 0%

Supply Demand and Strategies Board Downtown Chattanooga ing Study City Center North Based on the current development (homes, businesses and other uses) in the subarea, we can compare what we would expect parking demand to be with what levels of use we actually observed. This helps to guide what strategies may be most appropriate to manage parking, both now and in the future. Current Development SupplyDemand Balance and Potential Strategies Current + Future Development DRAFT Study work is still in progress and not yet final. What this board contains: The study team considered the land use information (the number of residential units, the amount of office space, etc.) in each subarea and estimated what demand for parking these uses generate. These estimates are driven by knowledge on how much parking demand typically occurs with these different uses. The team estimated both the unshared demand, or what would be needed if parking supported only a single use (i.e. residential parking), and real demand, or how much total parking is needed across the day. We compared this to the observed parking (illustrated in maps on the previous board) to understand how an estimated amount of parking compared to the observed use. In many cases, the observed use (again, what was actually counted by the team) today is lower than what we would expect, though in some cases the two are very close. When parking is built for a land use, zoning typically requires a certain amount (defined by a ratio of parking spaces to floor space, dwelling units, or other measures of intensity). These amounts are based on what the transportation industry understands the peak parking demand to be, regardless of when that happens in a day. This is the amount of parking that would be needed if we built it this way. However, peak levels of demand for different land uses occur at different times of the day. By comparing these peaks and considering how they overlap, we get a better sense of what the real demand is throughout the day. It is generally less than the exclusive demand shown above. This graph compares the estimated real demand with the amount that existing parking was observed to be used during field counts for parking utilization. Unshared Demand 1 1 1,000,000 :00 :00 :00 :00 Real Demand Profile 1 1 1,000,000 1 1 1,000,000 Unshared Peak: 1,51 Actual Supply:,35 Functional Supply:,17 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 Actual Supply:,35 Functional Supply:,17 Real Demand Profile and Observed Use :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 :00 2:00 2:00 1:00 Actual Supply:,35 Functional Supply:,17 3:00 3:00 2:00 3:00 :00 :00 :00 5:00 5:00 5:00 :00 Estimated Peak:,23 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 The study also considers forthcoming and future development to understand how new additions to downtown will change parking supply (by adding their own parking or building on land currently 1 1 1,000,000 Hotel: 700 rooms : 0 apartments : 50,000 square feet Retail: 2 square feet Restaurants: 2 square feet Real Demand Profile: LongTerm Future Growth Actual Supply:,2 Functional Supply:,2 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 Potential Strategic Approaches 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 Overall, these observations point to parking supply in the City Center district being greater than the expected levels of demand, even with the amount of new development assumed. However, as the utilization graphs illustrate, this available supply is not evenly distributed through the district. The study Why this information is important: Even when the utilization maps illustrate that parking facilities are heavily used or not heavily used, there is a districtwide relationship of overall parking to overall need. Understanding how these relate especially when expected demand is close to or even less than what use is observed helps parking managers and planners understand how urgently action may be needed to satisfy parking need. 5,7 7,050 7, 7, 6,0 3,70 2,0 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00

City Center North ing Inventory Downtown Chattanooga s business core, which also includes attractions such as Memorial Auditorium and the Tivoli Theater. This is the singlelargest subarea inventory in the overall downtown parking study area, with over a quarter of all downtown parking in this subarea alone. ront Pkwy ing Inventory (Supply) OnStreet W Aquarium Way W 3rd St Chestnut St St Broad Broad St St W 6th St Pine St St W 5th St W 7th St Tivoli Theater E th St W th St Martin Cherry St St Lookout Lookout St St Walnut St St Market Market St St E 6th St Luther King Blvd W th St W th St Miller Georgia Ave Memorial Auditorium Patten Pkwy Lindsay St E th St E th St 61 Oak St OffStreet (numbers of spaces indicated for each facility) W Aquariu 5 600 W 3rd St 172 51 5 1 6 6 Chestnut St St 2 77 6 1 37 Broad St St 60 2 0 W 6th St 3 Pine Pine St St 3 22 7 7 W 5th St 0 5 1 0 61 6 26 W 7th St Tivoli Theater 5 10 1 E th St 00 Cherry St St 17 W th St Martin 75 2 3 0 Walnut St St 56 Market St St 2 0 1 0 707 2 6 Lookout Lookout St St 32 2 E 6th St 326 W th St 00 00 5 Luther King Blvd W th St 1 62 17 1 Miller Georgia Ave 66 77 2 3 3 61 Memorial Auditorium 3 66 67 1 7 1 2 Patten Pkwy 2 65 65 5 1 Lindsay St 1 7 5 5 21 0 0 E th St 1 2 E th St 50 1 71 2 6 17 17 1 7 3 55 O ing Facility Type Number of Spaces Percentage of Spaces TOTAL SPACES,35 0% ONSTREET 1,05 % 2Hour Meters 756 6.0% No ing.6% Truck Loading 7 7.2% Bus Stops 17 1.6% Unregulated 1.% OFFSTREET, 1% Open to the Public 5,75 51.0% Reserved Spaces 1,.5% Customers Only 7 7.0% Employees Only 2,2 21.5% Employees and Customers 617 5.5% Valet ing 5 1.% Major ing Facilities in this district: Unum Garages ( spaces total) Liberty Garage (77 spaces) County Garage (707 spaces) Tallen Garage (6 spaces) Boynton ONSTREET PARKING TYPES No ing Free, Unregulated Free, Min ing Free, 1Hr ing Free, 2 Hour ing Free, Restricted Use Metered, Min Meters Metered, 2 Hour ing Metered, Hour ing Carter St Convention and Trade Center Broad St St Market Market St St Boynton OFFSTREET PARKING TYPES Employees Only Employees and Customers Customers / Guests Only Permit & Event ing Reserved Residence Only Valet Open / Public Convention and Trade Center Broad St St Market Market St St Volunteer Garage (5 spaces) EPB Garage (5 spaces)

City Center North ing Utilization The degree to which the district s parking is used throughout the day is driven by its employment focus: parking is much busier than weekday business hours than at other times. Rates of Utilization 0% to % % to 60% 60% to 0% 0% to 0% 0% to 0% Over 0% 7 am am am am am 1 pm 1 pm 3 pm 3 pm 5 pm 5 pm 7 pm Weekend Utilization (Saturday) Weekday Utilization (Thursday) Early morning parking activity is focused on hotels and other uses with overnight demand especially on weekends. Later into the weekday, many lots and garages are much closer to full, though little is exceeding functional capacity. On weekends, much of the offstreet facilities are mostly unused. The highest parking use rates are in the core business district, and they include both onstreet and offstreet parking. Although weekend parking is more heavily used and through a larger portion of the district, it remains mostly unused on weekends. Onstreet parking remains busy in the late afternoon on weekdays. Even on weekends when overall parking demand is lower, some onstreet locations are in high use. Onstreet parking remains busy in the late afternoon on weekdays. Even on weekends when overall parking demand is lower, some onstreet locations are in high use. Utilization declines substantially in the evenings, even though some onstreet locations and select offstreet lots remain in high use. 7 am am am am am 1 pm 1 pm 3 pm 3 pm 5 pm 5 pm 7 pm Rates of Utilization 0% to % % to 60% 60% to 0% 0% to 0% 0% to 0% Over 0%

City Center North SupplyDemand Balance Based on the current development (homes, businesses and other uses) in the subarea, we can compare what we would expect parking demand to be with what levels of use we actually observed. This helps to guide what strategies may be most appropriate to manage parking, both now and in the future. Current Development Current + Future Development When parking is built for a land use, zoning typically requires a certain amount (defined by a ratio of parking spaces to floor space, dwelling units, or other measures of intensity). These amounts are based on what the transportation industry understands the peak parking demand to be, regardless of when that happens in a day. This is the amount of parking that would be needed if we built it this way. Unshared Demand 1 1 1,000,000 Unshared Peak: 1,51 Actual Supply:,35 Functional Supply:,17 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 The study also considers forthcoming and future development to understand how new additions to downtown will change parking supply (by adding their own parking or building on land currently used for parking) but also add to parking demand. In the City Center North district, this included the following assumptions of new development: Hotel: 700 rooms : 0 apartments : 50,000 square feet Retail: 2 square feet Restaurants: 2 square feet Real Demand Profile Real Demand Profile: LongTerm Future Growth 1 1 However, peak levels of demand for different land uses occur at different times of the day. By comparing these peaks and considering how they overlap, we get a better sense of what the real demand is throughout the day. It is generally less than the exclusive demand shown above. 1 1,000,000 Actual Supply:,35 Functional Supply:,17 Estimated Peak:,23 1 1,000,000 Actual Supply:,2 Functional Supply:,2 Estimated Peak:,72 Considering real demand, there is still more parking in the district than what we would expect to be needed, even with future development. :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 Real Demand Profile and Observed Use 1 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 This graph compares the estimated real demand with the amount that existing parking was observed to be used during field counts for parking utilization. 1 1,000,000 Actual Supply:,35 Functional Supply:,17 Estimated Peak:,23 5,7 7,050 7, 7, 6,0 3,70 2,0 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00

City Center South ing Inventory The southern edge of the downtown core, including Warehouse Row, the Tennessee Valley Authority office buildings, and the Chattanooga Convention and Trade Center. ing Inventory (Supply) OnStreet OffStreet (numbers of spaces indicated for each facility) ing Facility Type Number of Spaces Percentage of Spaces Martin Luther King Blvd W th St W th St Miller E th St E th St King St Foster St 5 Martin 2 2 6 5 Luther King Blvd W th St W th St 1 Miller 67 2 65 65 E th St 21 2 E th St 1 7 3 55 71 1 2 26 35 75 King St 22 5 5 Foster St 2 1 TOTAL SPACES 5,5 0% ONSTREET 517 % 2Hour Meters 2 1.% 2Hour ing 0 23.2% No ing 5.% Bus Stops 21.1% Carter St Convention and Trade Center Fort St Chestnut St Broad St St W th St ONSTREET PARKING TYPES No ing Free, Unregulated Free, Min ing Free, 1Hr ing Free, 2 Hour ing Free, Restricted Use Metered, Min Meters Metered, 2 Hour ing Metered, Hour ing W Main St Market Market St St Cowart St W 1th St Williams St King St 6 3 Carter St 2 Convention and Trade Center 00 Fort St 6 2 1 7 Chestnut St 05 5 Broad St St W th St OFFSTREET PARKING TYPES Employees Only Employees and Customers Customers / Guests Only Permit & Event ing Reserved Residence Only Valet Open / Public 67 3 3 3 3 W Main St Market Market St St 7 7 7 7 Cowart St 5 1 2 50 1 1 35 10 W 1th St King St 23 3 0 3 3 26 5 1 53 22 Truck Loading 1 3.7% Unregulated 17 3.3% Electric Vehicle ing 17 3.3% Other Regulations 2.3% General Loading 6 1.2% Passenger Loading 0.% OFFSTREET 5,7 1% Open to the Public 3,32 60.7% Employees and Customers 0.6% Reserved Spaces 55.3% Employees Only 333 6.1% Customers Only 2 5.2% Permit/Event ing 6 2.5% Valet ing 0.5% Other Categories 0.1% Major ing Facilities in this district: Convention Center Garages (1,0 spaces) Southside Garage (1,005 spaces) Lot C (2 Spaces) Freight Depot Lot (2 spaces)

City Center South ing Utilization The district s parking serves both employment and destination land uses, such as the Convention Center and Warehouse Row, and parking activity reflects both of these purposes. Rates of Utilization 0% to % % to 60% 60% to 0% 0% to 0% 0% to 0% Over 0% 7 am am am am am 1 pm 1 pm 3 pm 3 pm 5 pm 5 pm 7 pm Weekend Utilization (Saturday) Weekday Utilization (Thursday) The Convention Center parking facility and Southside garages represents the largest amount of supply in the district, and their level of utilization tends to influence districtwide figures. Both of these facilities and others surrounding them are influenced heavily by TVA s campus. Some smaller parking facilities are in high levels of use, although the district generally functions within its capacity. On weekends, however, little of the district s parking is utilized. Into the later afternoon on weekdays, the effects of TVA employment are apparent, especially in the Southside Garage. 7 am am am am am 1 pm 1 pm 3 pm 3 pm 5 pm 5 pm 7 pm Rates of Utilization 0% to % % to 60% 60% to 0% 0% to 0% 0% to 0% Over 0%

City Center South SupplyDemand Balance Based on the current development (homes, businesses and other uses) in the subarea, we can compare what we would expect parking demand to be with what levels of use we actually observed. This helps to guide what strategies may be most appropriate to manage parking, both now and in the future. Current Development Current + Future Development When parking is built for a land use, zoning typically requires a certain amount (defined by a ratio of parking spaces to floor space, dwelling units, or other measures of intensity). These amounts are based on what the transportation industry understands the peak parking demand to be, regardless of when that happens in a day. This is the amount of parking that would be needed if we built it this way. Unshared Demand 7,000 Actual Supply: 5,5 Functional Supply: 5,36 Unshared Peak: 5, :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 The study also considers forthcoming and future development to understand how new additions to downtown will change parking supply (by adding their own parking or building on land currently used for parking) but also add to parking demand. In the City Center South district, this included the following assumptions of new development: Hotel: 0 rooms : townhomes : 50,000 square feet Retail: square feet Restaurants: square feet Real Demand Profile Real Demand Profile: LongTerm Future Growth However, peak levels of demand for different land uses occur at different times of the day. By comparing these peaks and considering how they overlap, we get a better sense of what the real demand is throughout the day. It is generally less than the exclusive demand shown above. 7,000 Actual Supply: 5,5 Functional Supply: 5,36 Estimated Peak:,3 7,000 Actual Supply: 5,71 Functional Supply: 5,373 Estimated Peak:,63 Considering real demand, there is still more parking in the district than what we would expect to be needed, even with future development. :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 This graph compares the estimated real demand with the amount that existing parking was observed to be used during field counts for parking utilization. Real Demand Profile and Observed Use 7,000 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 Actual Supply: 5,5 Functional Supply: 5,36 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 Estimated Peak:,3 1,5 2,7 3,67 3,670 2,7 2,55 2,1 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00

Broad St Broad St Market Market St St Market St St Mitchell Ave Ave Read Ave Ave Mitchell Ave Ave Read Read Ave Ave Downtown Chattanooga ing Study Southside ing Inventory A large district that encompasses the emerging business and entertainment corridor along Main Street, the Chattanooga Choo Choo, Finley Stadium, and the primary singlefamily neighborhood in the larger Downtown ing Study Area. ing Facility Type Number of Spaces Percentage of Spaces ing Inventory (Supply) C W th St TOTAL SPACES 5,61 0% ONSTREET 1,053 1% Unregulated 770 73.1% No ing 1.0% Other Regulations 3 3.6% 2Hour Meters 37 3.5% 2Hour ing 60 5.7% Bus Stops 21 2.0% Minute ing 0.% Truck Loading 3 0.3% General Loading 0.% OFFSTREET,566 1% Permit/Event ing 1,2 26.6% Employees and Customers 1,035 22.7% Employees Only 6.% Open to the Public 7.% Reserved Spaces 36.1% Residents Only 7 6.% Customers Only.1% Other Regulations 65 1.% Major ing Facilities in this district: Finley Stadium Lots (1,2 spaces total) CARTA South Garage (53 spaces) OffStreet (numbers of spaces indicated for each facility) OnStreet Chattown Skatepark Chattown Skatepark 6 3 Reggie White Blvd Carter St Reggie White Blvd 2 Fort St Finley Stadium W 1th St 00 Fort St 6 Finley Stadium W 1th St 2 1 7 Chestnut St Chestnut St Chestnut St Chestnut St 05 5 0 53 W Main St W th St W th St 3 0 W 17th St 3 7 7 W 17th St 2 32 0 Cowart St 7 67 3 W Main St W th St 7 Cowart St W 1th St 5 1 1 6 W 1th St Williams St W 1th St 10 W 1th St W 1th St Station St Long St 23 1 22 3 0 5 Williams St W 1th St 37 32 26 1 E th St 50 0 0 35 17 26 Long St 53 Station St 7 55 1 21 E th St 0 5 7 0 7 Johnson St Rossville Ave Ave Cappella St 1 th E E th St 17 Johnson St 10 1 S t Rossville Ave Ave Cappella St 1 th E E th St S t E Main St Kerr St 326 66 Kerr St E Main St Washington St Washington St E 17th St 3 3 55 E 17th St Adams Adams St St Adams Adams St St ONSTREET PARKING TYPES No ing Free, Unregulated Free, Min ing Free, 1Hr ing Free, 2 Hour ing Free, Restricted Use Metered, Min Meters Metered, 2 Hour ing Metered, Hour ing OFFSTREET PARKING TYPES Employees Only Employees and Customers Customers / Guests Only Permit & Event ing Reserved Residence Only Valet Open / Public Jefferson Street

Southside ing Utilization There is less employment in the Southside district than in City Center, but many parking lots are still used to more than 60 percent of their capacity. Weekend and evening patterns reflect the district s entertainment focus, especially along East Main. Rates of Utilization 0% to % % to 60% 60% to 0% 0% to 0% 0% to 0% Over 0% 7 am am am 3 pm pm pm Weekend Utilization (Saturday) Weekday Utilization (Thursday) Finley Stadium s parking lots are the single largest resource in the district, but due to their distance and specialuse nature, they are not heavily utilized throughout the week. However, smaller parking lots are more heavily used, and on a consistent basis. Finley Stadium lots see their busiest period of activity on weekends, especially during special events. ing patterns during weekday and weekend afternoons and evenings reflect the growth in the Southside as a dining and entertainment destination, with both onstreet and offstreet parking heavily used along East Main Street. 7 am am am 3 pm pm pm Rates of Utilization 0% to % % to 60% 60% to 0% 0% to 0% 0% to 0% Over 0%

Southside SupplyDemand Balance Based on the current development (homes, businesses and other uses) in the subarea, we can compare what we would expect parking demand to be with what levels of use we actually observed. This helps to guide what strategies may be most appropriate to manage parking, both now and in the future. Current Development Current + Future Development When parking is built for a land use, zoning typically requires a certain amount (defined by a ratio of parking spaces to floor space, dwelling units, or other measures of intensity). These amounts are based on what the transportation industry understands the peak parking demand to be, regardless of when that happens in a day. This is the amount of parking that would be needed if we built it this way. Unshared Demand 3,500 2,500 1,500 500 Unshared Peak: 2,733 Actual Supply: 5,61 Functional Supply: 5.0 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 The study also considers forthcoming and future development to understand how new additions to downtown will change parking supply (by adding their own parking or building on land currently used for parking) but also add to parking demand. In the Southside district, this included the following assumptions of new development: Hotel: 0 rooms : 00 apartments and 0 townhomes : 60,000 square feet Retail: 50,000 square feet Restaurants:,000 square feet Real Demand Profile Actual Supply: 5,61 Functional Supply: 5.0 Real Demand Profile: LongTerm Future Growth Actual Supply: 6,177 Functional Supply: 5,55 However, peak levels of demand for different land uses occur at different times of the day. By comparing these peaks and considering how they overlap, we get a better sense of what the real demand is throughout the day. It is generally less than the exclusive demand shown above. 3,500 2,500 1,500 Estimated Peak: 2,5 3,500 2,500 1,500 Estimated Peak: 2,5 Considering real demand, there is still more parking in the district than what we would expect to be needed, even with future development. 500 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 500 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 This graph compares the estimated real demand with the amount that existing parking was observed to be used during field counts for parking utilization. Real Demand Profile and Observed Use 3,500 2,500 1,500 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 Estimated Peak: 2,5 Actual Supply: 5,61 :00 :00 :00 Functional Supply: 5.0 500 :00 1,71 2,1 2,21 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00

Riverfront ing Inventory The Riverfront is downtown Chattanooga s primary destination for tourists and visitors, anchored by the Tennessee Aquarium and AT&T and connected to the north shore of the Tennessee River by the Walnut Street pedestrian bridge. It also features the Bluff View Arts District, home of the Hunter Museum of American Art. ing Facility Type Number of Spaces Percentage of Spaces ing Inventory (Supply) TOTAL SPACES,560 0% Hunter Museum of American Art E 2nd St ONSTREET 66 1% 2Hour Meters 35 55.% Unregulated 1.3% No ing 63.% Bus Stops 1 6.3% General Loading 0 0.0% Truck Loading 2 3.7% OFFSTREET 3,1 6% Open to the Public 2,3 5.3% Employees Only 52 1.3% Employees and Customers 322.2% Customers Only 56 1.5% Reserved Spaces 3.% Residents Only 2 7.6% Other Regulations 0.2% Major ing Facilities in this district: River Pier Garage ( spaces) CARTA North Garage (600 spaces) OffStreet (numbers of spaces indicated for each facility) OnStreet Riverfront Pkwy Ross' Landing 7 AT&T Riverfront Pkwy Ross' Landing 35 AT&T 61 Tennessee Aquarium W Aquarium Way 1 W 3rd St Tennessee Aquarium W Aquarium Way 5 600 W 3rd St 172 1 2 5 E 1st St Chestnut Chestnut St St 1 6 5 Broad St St E 1st St 6 Chestnut St St 2 1 37 5 33 Broad St St E Aquarium Way 21 W 5th St E Aquarium Way 2 0 2 3 22 7 7 W 5th St 1 0 61 E th St 26 10 Cherry Cherry St St Hunter Museum of American Art 6 3 1 E th St 75 Walnut Walnut St St 00 Cherry Cherry St St 3 2 0 Walnut Walnut St St Lookout St St High St St E 6th St E 2nd St 17 3 0 2 Lookout St St 0 707 High High St St 2 E 6th St 00 00 Georgia Ave 1 Georgia Ave E 3rd Memorial Auditorium 2 3 3 1 7 1 2 61 Memorial Auditorium E 5t say St E 3rd St 1 Lindsay St 1 ONSTREET PARKING TYPES No ing Free, Unregulated Free, Min ing Free, 1Hr ing Free, 2 Hour ing Free, Restricted Use Metered, Min Meters Metered, 2 Hour ing Metered, Hour ing OFFSTREET PARKING TYPES E th St Employees Only Employees and Customers Customers / Guests Only Permit & Event ing Reserved Residence Only Valet Open / Public NOTE: The reserved structures and lot serving Unum s headquarters office complex lie within the Riverfront district but are counted in City Center North.

Riverfront ing Utilization Weekday Utilization (Thursday) 1 pm 3 pm Weekend Utilization (Saturday) 71 am pm 3 pm am The district s concentration of visitor uses, especially the Tennessee Aquarium, leads to higher parking demand later in the day. ing in this district is less occupied on weekdays than on weekends, but some parking especially supporting hotels is routinely busy. The district s concentration of visitor uses, especially the Tennessee Aquarium, leads to higher parking demand later in the day. Several large facilities are effectively full on weekends, although these are largely located around the Aquarium and baseball stadium. Onstreet parking is heavily used in these same areas, especially later in the afternoon and evening when it is not metered. 7 am am 3 pm 5 pm 7 am am 73 am pm 5 pm am am am 5 pm 7 pm 7 am am 75 am pm 7 pm am am 1 pm 7 pm pm 7 am 1 pm am 7 am pm pm am Rates of Utilization 0% to % % to 60% 60% to 0% 0% to 0% 0% to 0% Over 0%

Riverfront SupplyDemand Balance Based on the current development (homes, businesses and other uses) in the subarea, we can compare what we would expect parking demand to be with what levels of use we actually observed. This helps to guide what strategies may be most appropriate to manage parking, both now and in the future. Current Development Current + Future Development When parking is built for a land use, zoning typically requires a certain amount (defined by a ratio of parking spaces to floor space, dwelling units, or other measures of intensity). These amounts are based on what the transportation industry understands the peak parking demand to be, regardless of when that happens in a day. This is the amount of parking that would be needed if we built it this way. Unshared Demand Unshared Peak:,1 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 Actual Supply:,560 Functional Supply:, 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 The study also considers forthcoming and future development to understand how new additions to downtown will change parking supply (by adding their own parking or building on land currently used for parking) but also add to parking demand. In the Riverfront district, this included the following assumptions of new development: Hotel: 0 rooms : 0 apartments and townhomes :,000 square feet Retail: square feet Restaurants: square feet Real Demand Profile Real Demand Profile: LongTerm Future Growth However, peak levels of demand for different land uses occur at different times of the day. By comparing these peaks and considering how they overlap, we get a better sense of what the real demand is throughout the day. It is generally less than the exclusive demand shown above. Actual Supply:,560 Functional Supply:, Estimated Peak: 3,6 Actual Supply:, Functional Supply:,00 Estimated Peak: 3,3 Considering real demand, there is still more parking in the district than what we would expect to be needed, even with future development. :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 Real Demand Profile and Observed Use :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 This graph compares the estimated real demand with the amount that existing parking was observed to be used during field counts for parking utilization. Actual Supply:,560 Functional Supply:, Estimated Peak: 3,6 60 1,1 1,663 1,7 1,600 1,67 2,71 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00

Mabel St St Douglas St University St el el St St as St ity St Magnolia Magnolia St St St St Downtown Chattanooga ing Study UTC Campus Area ing Inventory This district is primarily the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga campus and adjacent blocks. Although it has many facilities with over 0 spaces each, it does not contain any large, single structure that anchors parking in the district. Most of the district s parking is also controlled by permits, with some facilities also offering hourly or daily access to public parking customers. ing Facility Type Number of Spaces Percentage of Spaces TOTAL SPACES 6, 0% ONSTREET 23 % Unregulated 326 3.6% 2Hour Meters 22.7% ing Inventory (Supply) E 3rd St E th St McKenzie Arena E 3rd St C h a t t a n o o g a Co n fe d e r a t e Ce m e t e r y Collins St Palmetto Palmetto St St P alm alm E 3rd St E th ONSTREET PARKING TYPES No ing Free, Unregulated Free, Min ing Free, 1Hr ing Free, 2 Hour ing No ing 2 1.5% Bus Stop 3.% General Loading 1.% 1Hour ing 1.% Vine St Lansing Ct Vine St UTC Fine Arts Center Free, Restricted Use Metered, Min Meters Metered, 2 Hour ing Metered, Hour ing Truck Loading 17 2.1% Other Regulations 1 1.7% Government Vehicles 1.3% Electric Vehicle ing 0.5% 2Hour ing 7 0.% Passenger Loading 1 0.1% OFFSTREET 5,35 7% Permit/Event ing 3,53 73.0% Reserved Spaces 72 1.0% Employees and Customers 326 6.0% Residents Only 2.0% Employees Only 0.0% Other Regulations 0.0% Major ing Facilities in this district: UTC Garages & (353 spaces) UTC Garage (5 spaces) UTC Lot (362 spaces) OffStreet (numbers of spaces indicated for each facility) OnStreet rial ium wy 1 2 7 Lindsay St Oak St ston St McCallie Ave 1 E th St 62 Campus Dr Oak St 0 Palmetto St Flynn St 1 1 62 Memorial 7 Auditorium 66 6 2 17 1 17 7 3 66 0 7 65 0 Patten Pkwy E 3rd St 5 1 7 Lindsay St 5 0 50 1 E th St 1 62 17 17 Oak St Houston St 1 33 0 3 McKenzie Arena Vine St 26 6 5 33 3 33 51 52 5 McCallie Ave E th St Lansing Ct E 3rd St 2 C h a t t a n o o g a Co n fe d e r a t e Ce m e t e r y 2 Campus Dr 2 12 362 Oak St 353 1 35 Collins St 3 2 Vine St 55 0 2 UTC Fine Arts Center Palmetto St Palmetto Palmetto St St 6 5 Flynn St 3 35 P alm alm e tto tto E 3rd St 5 S t 55 3 17 0 23 E th St 53 OFFSTREET PARKING TYPES Employees Only Employees and Customers Customers / Guests Only Permit & Event ing Reserved Residence Only Valet Open / Public

UTC Campus Area ing Utilization 1 pm 3 pm 1 pm 3 pm Weekday Utilization (Thursday) Weekend Utilization (Saturday) The high levels of use of UTC s parking facilities follow the regular hours of the day when classes are held and university offices are open. Some facilities remain in high use throughout the day, though many are under half full after 5 pm. ing on the university campus is significantly less utilized on weekends, with exceptions being facilities in the center of campus near the Library and Student Center. 7 am am 37 pm am 5 pm am 7 am am 37 pm am 5 pm am am am pm am 7 pm am am am pm am 7 pm am am 1 pm 7 pm am pm am am 1 pm 7 pm am pm am Rates of Utilization 0% to % % to 60% 60% to 0% 0% to 0% 0% to 0% Over 0%

UTC Campus Area SupplyDemand Balance Based on the current development (homes, businesses and other uses) in the subarea, we can compare what we would expect parking demand to be with what levels of use we actually observed. This helps to guide what strategies may be most appropriate to manage parking, both now and in the future. Current Development Current + Future Development When parking is built for a land use, zoning typically requires a certain amount (defined by a ratio of parking spaces to floor space, dwelling units, or other measures of intensity). These amounts are based on what the transportation industry understands the peak parking demand to be, regardless of when that happens in a day. This is the amount of parking that would be needed if we built it this way. Unshared Demand 7,000 Actual Supply: 6, Functional Supply: 5. Unshared Peak: 5, :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 (UTC) The study also considers forthcoming and future development to understand how new additions to downtown will change parking supply (by adding their own parking or building on land currently used for parking) but also add to parking demand. In the UTC district, this included the following assumptions of new development: Student : 600 student beds Overall 65% growth in enrollment These enrollment figures are based on current UTC planning with the university s Master Plan and assume that no significant changes occur to bring more students to campus or to change how students and faculty rely on automobile use and parking. The study s final recommendations will include a series of scenarios on how the University might continue its future growth. Real Demand Profile Real Demand Profile: LongTerm Future Growth However, peak levels of demand for different land uses occur at different times of the day. By comparing these peaks and considering how they overlap, we get a better sense of what the real demand is throughout the day. It is generally less than the exclusive demand shown above. 7,000 Actual Supply: 6, Functional Supply: 5. :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 Estimated Peak: 5, 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 (UTC),000,000,000 7,000 Actual Supply: 6,65 Functional Supply: 6,0 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 Estimated Peak:,3 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 (UTC) Considering real demand, there is still more parking in the district than what we would expect to be needed, even with future development. Real Demand Profile and Observed Use 7,000 :00 :00 :00 Actual Supply: 6, Functional Supply: 5. :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 This graph compares the estimated real demand with the amount that existing parking was observed to be used during field counts for parking utilization. Estimated Peak: 5, (UTC) 3,267 3,23 3,6 3, 3, 3,0 2,65 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00

Central Central Ave Ave Central Ave Ave Downtown Chattanooga ing Study Health & Ed District ing Inventory Composed primarily of Erlanger and Siskin Hospitals, this district also includes the Chattanooga for Arts and Sciences and the Hamilton County Health Department offices. This is a major employment center on the eastern edge of downtown. ing Inventory (Supply) ing Facility Type Number of Spaces Percentage of Spaces TOTAL SPACES 5,2 0% ONSTREET 33 1% Unregulated 1 5.5% No ing.3% Bus Stop 6 1.2% OFFSTREET 5,261 % Open to the Public 2,771 53.0% Reserved Spaces 1,73 33.0% Customers Only 5.0% Employees and Customers 1 3.0% Employees Only 1 3.0% Valet ing 7 2.0% Permit/Event ing 52 1.0% Other Regulations 37 1.0% Major ing Facilities in this district: Erlanger Hospital Garage (2,3 spaces) Siskin Hospital Garage ( spaces) OffStreet (numbers of spaces indicated for each facility) OnStreet 1 51 62 ng Ct 5 Lansing Ct E 3rd St C h a t t a n o o g a Co n fe d e r a t e Ce m e t e r y E 3rd St Siskin Dr 12 362 Collins St 1 50 Siskin Dr 2 2 C h a t t a n o o g a Co n fe d e r a t e Ce m e t e r y Collins St 2 75 72 0 Palmetto St St Palmetto Palmetto St St 6 S t P alm alm e tto tto 2 5 5 55 E 3rd St E th St 0 0 0 26 1 1 36 22 0 3 S t P alm alm e tto tto E 3rd St 6 3 17 23 72 23 5 2 2 E th St 53 52 23 21 50 5 6 Engel Engel Stadium ONSTREET PARKING TYPES No ing Free, Unregulated Free, Min ing Free, 1Hr ing Free, 2 Hour ing Free, Restricted Use Metered, Min Meters Metered, 2 Hour ing Metered, Hour ing OFFSTREET PARKING TYPES Employees Only Employees and Customers Customers / Guests Only Permit & Event ing Reserved Residence Only Valet Open / Public

Health & Ed District ing Utilization Weekday Utilization (Thursday) 1 pm 3 pm Weekend Utilization (Saturday) 1 pm 3 pm Utilization is heaviest in the morning and early afternoon, reflecting both the shiftbased employment of both hospitals (which does not follow regular to5 business hour schedules) and the relative frequency of patient services in the mornings. By the midafternoon, utilization is significantly less. The district has low levels of utilization throughout the weekend, with most facilities under percent utilized. 7 am am 37 pm am 5 pm am 7 am am 37 pm am 5 pm am am am pm am 7 pm am am am pm am 7 pm am am 1 pm 7 pm am pm am am 1 pm 7 pm am pm am Rates of Utilization 0% to % % to 60% 60% to 0% 0% to 0% 0% to 0% Over 0%

Health & Ed District SupplyDemand Balance Based on the current development (homes, businesses and other uses) in the subarea, we can compare what we would expect parking demand to be with what levels of use we actually observed. This helps to guide what strategies may be most appropriate to manage parking, both now and in the future. Current Development Current + Future Development When parking is built for a land use, zoning typically requires a certain amount (defined by a ratio of parking spaces to floor space, dwelling units, or other measures of intensity). These amounts are based on what the transportation industry understands the peak parking demand to be, regardless of when that happens in a day. This is the amount of parking that would be needed if we built it this way. Unshared Demand Actual Supply: 5,2 Functional Supply:,765 Unshared Peak:,05 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 (CSAS) (includes medical office) (Hospitals) The study also considers forthcoming and future development to understand how new additions to downtown will change parking supply (by adding their own parking or building on land currently used for parking) but also add to parking demand. In the Health & Ed district, this included the following assumptions of new development: Hospitals: new outpatients at Siskin; Children s Hospital built with % increase in patient activity Hotel: 0 rooms : 50 apartments Medical : 0,000 square feet Retail: 0,000 square feet Real Demand Profile Real Demand Profile: LongTerm Future Growth However, peak levels of demand for different land uses occur at different times of the day. By comparing these peaks and considering how they overlap, we get a better sense of what the real demand is throughout the day. It is generally less than the exclusive demand shown above. Actual Supply: 5,2 Functional Supply:,765 (CSAS) (includes Estimated Peak:,37 medical office) Estimated Peak: 5,5 (Hospitals) Actual Supply:, Functional Supply:, (CSAS) (includes medical office) (Hospitals) Considering real demand, there is still more parking in the district than what we would expect to be needed, even with future development. :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 This graph compares the estimated real demand with the amount that existing parking was observed to be used during field counts for parking utilization. Real Demand Profile and Observed Use :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 Actual Supply: 5,2 Functional Supply:,765 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 1:00 2:00 2:00 3:00 3:00 :00 :00 5:00 5:00,61,6,3 3,0 2,76 1,1 73 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 Estimated Peak:,37 :00 (CSAS) (includes medical office) (Hospitals)

Peeples Peeples St St Mabel Mabel St St Douglas St University St Peeples St St Mabel Mabel St St Douglas St University St Magnolia St St Magnolia St St Downtown Chattanooga ing Study Martin Luther King Corridor ing Inventory This district is the smallest in the overall study area and is focused on the Martin Luther King corridor east of Georgia Avenue. It is the location of emerging businesses and residential development, though the latter is closely tied to (and parking is influenced by) UTC. ing Facility Type Number of Spaces Percentage of Spaces TOTAL SPACES 2,53 0% ONSTREET 33 % 2Hour ing 1.0% Free, No Time Limit 3.6% No ing 32.5% Truck Loading.% Government Vehicles 7 2.1% Hour Meters 1.2% General Loading 2 0.6% Electric Vehicle ing 2 0.6% OFFSTREET 2,5 7% Reserved Spaces 635 2.0% Permit/Event ing 60.0% Employees Only 375 17.0% Employees and Customers 35.0% Residents Only 17.0% Open to the Public 5 6.0% Other Regulations.0% Customers Only 33 1.0% ing Inventory (Supply) OffStreet OnStreet kwy E th St E th St Houston St King St Foster St E th St E Martin Luther King Blvd 5 0 Palmetto St Whiteside E th St Flynn St 1 17 7 3 66 0 7 65 0 Patten Pkwy 5 65 65 5 E th St 5 21 2 E th St 50 7 55 71 Houston St 1 1 33 King St 35 22 23 5 5 26 Foster St 1 2 3 7 E th St 52 70 63 E Martin Luther King Blvd 2 6 35 Palmetto St Whiteside E th St Wall St Flynn St 35 Wall St 0 Ave Ave ONSTREET PARKING TYPES No ing Free, Unregulated Free, Min ing Free, 1Hr ing Free, 2 Hour ing Free, Restricted Use Metered, Min Meters Metered, 2 Hour ing Metered, Hour ing OFFSTREET PARKING TYPES Employees Only Employees and Customers Customers / Guests Only Permit & Event ing Reserved Residence Only Valet Open / Public

Martin Luther King Corridor ing Utilization Weekday Utilization (Thursday) Weekend Utilization (Saturday) ing patterns during weekday and weekends vary, with heavily used facilities near others that are under percent used. 7 am am 7 am am The western half of the corridor, generally between Lindsay Street and the railroad, is where parking utilization is highest, with both onstreet and offstreet parking in heavy use. am 3 pm am 3 pm Utilization on weekdays is lowest in the late afternoon and evening, although some facilities associated with student housing remain heavily used. pm pm pm pm Utilization on weekends is lowest in the late afternoon and evening throughout the study area, although demand is concentrated in key locations that are still highly utilized. Rates of Utilization 0% to % % to 60% 60% to 0% 0% to 0% 0% to 0% Over 0%

ML King Corridor SupplyDemand Balance Based on the current development (homes, businesses and other uses) in the subarea, we can compare what we would expect parking demand to be with what levels of use we actually observed. This helps to guide what strategies may be most appropriate to manage parking, both now and in the future. Current Development Current + Future Development When parking is built for a land use, zoning typically requires a certain amount (defined by a ratio of parking spaces to floor space, dwelling units, or other measures of intensity). These amounts are based on what the transportation industry understands the peak parking demand to be, regardless of when that happens in a day. This is the amount of parking that would be needed if we built it this way. Unshared Demand Actual Supply: 2,53 Functional Supply: 2,65 Unshared Peak: 1,37 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 The study also considers forthcoming and future development to understand how new additions to downtown will change parking supply (by adding their own parking or building on land currently used for parking) but also add to parking demand. In the Martin Luther King corridor district, this included the following assumptions of new development: : 0 apartments and 0 student beds Retail: 2 square feet Restaurants: 2 square feet Real Demand Profile Real Demand Profile: LongTerm Future Growth However, peak levels of demand for different land uses occur at different times of the day. By comparing these peaks and considering how they overlap, we get a better sense of what the real demand is throughout the day. It is generally less than the exclusive demand shown above. Actual Supply: 2,53 Functional Supply: 2,65 Estimated Peak: 6 Actual Supply: 3, Functional Supply: 3,10 Estimated Peak: 1,12 Considering real demand, there is still more parking in the district than what we would expect to be needed, even with future development. :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 Real Demand Profile and Observed Use :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 This graph compares the estimated real demand with the amount that existing parking was observed to be used during field counts for parking utilization. Actual Supply: 2,53 Functional Supply: 2,65 Estimated Peak: 6 36 61 1,0 733 632 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 1:00 2:00 3:00 :00 5:00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00