Pacific Whiting Conservation Cooperative. Amendment 20 Catcher/Processor Cooperative. Final Annual Report 2014

Similar documents
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE REPORT: ANALYSIS OF SEAFLOOR CONTACT IN MIDWATER TRAWLS ENGAGED IN THE US WEST COAST PACIFIC HAKE FISHERY

California Sea Grant College Program

DRAFT Stock Assessment of Pacific Hake, Merluccius productus, (a.k.a. Whiting) in U.S. and Canadian Waters in 2009

9.0 Consistency with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSFCMA)

Preliminary Report Oceana Important Ecological Areas Seafloor Habitat Expedition Off the Central Oregon Coast. November 1, 2013

Stock Assessment of Pacific Hake, Merluccius productus, (a.k.a. Whiting) in U.S. and Canadian Waters in 2010

Use of Ocean Observations to Develop Forecasts in Support of Fisheries Management

This Presentation Will Cover

Distributional changes of west coast species and impacts of climate change on species and species groups

Ecological Atlas of the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas, 2 nd Edition: Metadata

Name/ Affiliation: Ben Enticknap, Fishery Project Coordinator Alaska Marine Conservation Council Address: PO Box Anchorage, AK 99510

3.4 Southeast Alaska Region

Socioeconomic Profile and Spatial Analysis of Fisheries in the three central California National Marine Sanctuaries

Spatial dynamics of small pelagic fish in the California Current system on the regime time-scale. Parallel processes in other species-ecosystems.

Final Completion Report Assessment of Recreational Halibut Harvest in Alaska

Report of. the Akutan Catcher Vessel. Association. North Pacific Fishery Management Council. Presented to the

Potential of Observer Data for Assessment: Standardizing CPUE from the Eastern Aleutian Islands Golden King Crab Fishery Observer Data

SCW6-Doc05. CPUE standardization for the offshore fleet fishing for Jack mackerel in the SPRFMO area

The Status of Dover Sole (Microstomus pacificus) along the U.S. West Coast in 2011

Alaska Sportfishing Charter Operator Survey Pilot Project: July 30 through September 21, 2001

3.3 South Central Alaska Region

J.P. Glazer and D.S. Butterworth

Fisheries Observers as Enforcement Assets: Lessons from the North Pacific. Marine Policy, Elsevier Press, Published online January 2010

Empirical evidence for North Pacific regime shifts in 1977 and 1989

NOAA 2011 Protected Species Studies of Eulachon Smelt in Oregon and Washington

Stock Assessment of Pacific Ocean Perch in Waters off of the U.S. West Coast in 2011

Fish Without Borders: Trends in the Status and Distribution of Groundfish in the Transboundary Waters of Washington and British Columbia

GROUNDFISH AMENDMENT 28 REGULATION DEVELOPMENT UPDATE

CALIFORNIA CURRENT INTEGRATED ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT (CCIEA) STATE OF THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT REPORT, 2016

Spanish Mackerel and Cobia Abundance Indices from SEAMAP Groundfish Surveys in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. AG Pollack and GW Ingram, Jr SEDAR28 DW03

CLIMAR-III Third JCOMM Workshop on Advances in Marine Climatology 6-9 May Gdynia, Poland

Evaluating the Impact of Rights-based Fisheries Management: Evidence from the New England Groundfish Fishery

Falkland Island Fisheries Department. Golden Chicha (ZDLC1) Falkland Islands. Ignacio Payá. - March

PROJECT TEAM REPORT 2 ON ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT AND ROCKFISH CONSERVATION AREA SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

National Perspectives - Portugal. Margarida Almodovar

USE OF STATISTICAL BOOTSTRAPPING FOR SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION TO ESTIMATE LENGTH-FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR PACIFIC ALBACORE TUNA (THUNNUS ALALUNGA)

Hydrography and biological resources in the western Bering Sea. Gennady V. Khen, Eugeny O. Basyuk. Pacific Research Fisheries Centre (TINRO-Centre)

Marine Spatial Planning: A Tool for Implementing Ecosystem-Based Management

Multi-sector biodiversity surveys: integrating federal, territorial and community-based surveys. Kevin J. Hedges

Falkland Island Fisheries Department. Loligo gahi Stock Assessment Survey, First Season Argos Vigo (ZDLU1) Falkland Islands

Dab (Limanda limanda) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat)

4/26/94 Revised 12/26/96 5/9/99 7/30/01 WSCC UNSCHEDULED FLOW MITIGATION PLAN

Complementary information to the Commission's Impact Assessment. European Parliament Meeting of the Fisheries Committee Brussels 18 June 2013

Assessing regional patterns of juvenile salmon growth in the Salish Sea

Advice September 2012

Application of GIS in Marine Fisheries Trawl Surveys

MARITIMES RESEARCH VESSEL SURVEY TRENDS ON GEORGES BANK

Maritime Weather Information: Automatic Reporting, A New Paradigm

Monitoring MPAs in Deep Water Off Central California IMPACT Submersible Baseline Survey

Status of the U.S. petrale sole resource in 2008

Harvest, Catch, and Participation in Alaska Sport Fisheries During 1997

Data poor Impact Assessment: The case of the fisheries around Fehmarn Island

53 contributors for 35 individual reports in 2009 show 5% of figures today

Abstract. Keywords: blue ling, GIS, marine protection areas, spatial management. 1. Introduction. P. Posen, P. Large and J. Lee

Implementation of the Political Declaration on energy cooperation between the North Seas Countries. Support Group 1 on Maritime Spatial Planning

Salmon prey assemblages and oceanographic conditions along the California Current shelf ecosystem

W. R. Bowering and D. Power Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, P. O. Box 5667 St. John s, Newfoundland, Canada A1C 5X1. Abstract

Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in Subarea 7 (Southern Celtic Seas, and the English Channel)

Completion Report. Punt, Andre

Public Disclosure Copy. Implementation Status & Results Report Pacific Islands Regional Oceanscape Program - Solomon Islands (P151777)

Country Fiche Estonia

Review of Vermont Yankee Thermal Discharge Permit Requirements and Analysis of Connecticut River Water Temperature and Flow

HAB Forecaster. For info on HABs in the Pacific Northwest see:

Fish Conservation and Management

TEPCO. August 28, Revised Version We have corrected the unit of the standard value on page 2.

Marine Spatial Planning, a Norwegian user case NSHC33

Persistence of prey hot spots in southeast Alaska

Biogeographic Approach to Coastal Assessments & Spatial Planning

SEDAR 42- DW November 2014

MPAs - do we need them?

Rebate Report. $15,990,000 Public Finance Authority Charter School Revenue Bonds (Voyager Foundation, Inc. Project) Series 2012A

ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF BAITFISH STOCKS IN PUGET SOUND. Final Report Service Contract No. 501 Washington Department of Fisheries 1973

BOEM Marine Minerals Program

Subject: Availability of New and Revised Public Housing Agency (PHA) Five-Year and Annual Plan Templates and Other Forms

Country Fiche Estonia

Supplemental Figures and Tables for Groundfish EFH Review Phase 1 Report Federal and State Marine Protected Areas Type of Fishing Restriction

Serial No. N4470 NAFO SCR Doc. 01/83 SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 2001

ATLANTIC HERRING PDT. Jamie M. Cournane, Ph.D. University of New Hampshire and Environmental Defense Fund

Administration by the CER of the Carbon Revenue Levy

ARCTIC FISHERIES: GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

Math 122 Fall Solutions for Recitation Handout 16: Taylor Series and the Atlantic Bluefin Tuna

EGMP Meeting in Stockholm in the framework of the Swedish Presidency 21 March, Stockholm. Linda Lingsten Unit of maritime spatial planning

OMNIBUS ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT AMENDMENT 2 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Fish and Fish Habitat Follow-up Program. Scotian Basin Exploration Project

Fishing effects enhanced variability and sensitivity of exploited fish populations

ESTONIAN SVALBARD EXPLORATORY SURVEY

Norway s Integrated Ocean Management (IOM) Policies and Plans - A Brief Presentation

Vineyard Wind NGO Agreement January 22, 2019

The IUCN Facilitated Independent Advisory Panel on Remediation and Rehabilitation of Biodiversity and Habitats of Oil Spill Sites in the Niger Delta

DOCUMENT SAC-08-03e THE FISHERY ON FISH-AGGREGATING DEVICES (FADs) IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN UPDATE

Estimating the relative abundance of juvenile coho salmon in the Strait of Georgia using trawls

SHIFT IN SIZE-AT-AGE OF THE STRAIT OF GEORGIA POPULATION OF PACIFIC HAKE (MERLUCCIUS PRODUCTUS)

Draft Model Memorandum of Understanding to promote voluntary cooperation between Government and Chemical Industry to enhance Precursors Chemicals

Appendix 12J Winter-Run Chinook Salmon Life Cycle Modeling

HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES MANAGEMENT TEAM REPORT ON SWORDFISH MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN HARDCAPS

28TH LOWELL WAKEFIELD FISHERIES SYMPOSIUM

Pacific Salmon Commission Technical Report No. 13

Climatic and Ecological Conditions in the California Current LME for Month to Month Year

Aquaculture Spatial Planning: The case of Greece

RD1 - Page 469 of 578

Transcription:

Informational Report 3 April 2015 Pacific Whiting Conservation Cooperative Amendment 20 Catcher/Processor Cooperative Final Annual Report 2014 Submitted to the National Marine Fisheries Service March 2015

Pacific Whiting Conservation Cooperative Final Annual Report for 2014 Introduction In 1997, the owners of the catcher/processor (C/P) vessels operating in the Pacific whiting fishery formed a fishing cooperative to coordinate harvesting efforts. This research and harvesting cooperative is the Pacific Whiting Conservation Cooperative (PWCC). A private contract dictates the activities of the PWCC and a harvest agreement facilitates efficient management and accurate accounting of harvest by the PWCC and PWCC member companies. In 2011, rationalization of the US Pacific coast groundfish trawl fishery was implemented via Amendments 20 and 21 to the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) summarized the significant effects of Amendment 20 on the shoreside groundfish trawl and mothership whiting fisheries, as well as the effect on the C/P fishery in the September 2, 2011 proposed rule for the Program Improvement and Enhancement (PIE) Rule: In January 2011, NMFS and the Pacific Fishery Management Council set up a new management program called the trawl rationalization program. This program significantly changes how two of these groups work. Shore trawlers now fish under their own set of individual species quotas by vessel. [T]he mothership fishery works as a coop where catcher-vessels and motherships work together collectively. The catcherprocessor fleet continues as a single coop. Trawl rationalization regulations require a final report of the prior year s fishery be submitted to NMFS in March the following year. Purpose of Report This report is intended to disclose all information required or identified in Federal Regulations at 50 CFR 660.113(d)(3). The table in this report is largely self-explanatory. The catch data in this report was provided by Sea State, Inc. and was obtained from the NMFS At-Sea Hake Observer Program. Prior to trawl rationalization, NMFS provided a similar report, but with catch information at the sector level (rather than individual vessel information). Catch information at the C/P-vessel level was and is known by NMFS. Therefore, production of this more detailed report by the PWCC should reduce NMFS workload and cost burden. Reporting Requirements Federal regulations (50CFR660.113(d)(3)) detail the report requirements: (3) Annual coop report The designated coop manager for the C/P coop must submit an annual report to NMFS and the Council by March 31 each year, before a coop permit is issued for that year. The annual coop report will contain information about the previous year's fishery, including: 1

(i) The C/P sector's annual allocation of Pacific whiting; (ii) The C/P coop's actual retained and discarded catch of Pacific whiting, salmon, Pacific halibut, rockfish, groundfish, and other species on a vessel-by-vessel basis; (iii) A description of the method used by the C/P coop to monitor performance of cooperative vessels that participated in the fishery; (iv) A description of any actions taken by the C/P coop in response to any vessels that exceed their allowed catch and bycatch; and (v) Plans for the current year's C/P coop fishery, including the companies participating in the cooperative, the harvest agreement, and catch monitoring and reporting requirements. A. C/P Sector's Annual Allocation of Pacific Whiting In May 2014, NMFS issued the C/P cooperative permit, which was effective on May 15, 2014. As specified at 50 CFR 660.160(c), [t]he C/P Coop Program allocation of Pacific whiting is equal to the catcher/processor sector allocation. Only a single coop may be formed in the catcher/processor sector with the one permitted coop receiving the catcher/ processor sector allocation. For 2014, the C/P sector amounts of Pacific whiting and non-whiting groundfish species with allocations are as follows (per NMFS, Initial Administrative Determination Notice of Right to Appeal, May 13, 2014): 2014 C/P sector allocations mt pounds Pacific whiting 88,186 194,416,619 Pacific ocean perch 10.2 22,487 Widow rockfish 170.0 374,785 Darkblotched rockfish 9.0 19,842 Canary rockfish 7.6 16,755 Two reapportioments of tribal Pacific whiting occurred in 2014, the first on September 12, 2014 (25,000 mt) and a second on October 23, 2014 (20,000 mt), which resulted in a final 2014 C/P sector allocation of 103,486 mt. In October 2014, the Mothership (MS) sector exceeded their allocation of darkblotched rockfish and voluntarily ceased fishing. Based on guidance from NMFS that it was the only timely measure to quickly re-open the MS fishery, the C/P sector notified NMFS that it was likely that 3.0 mt of darkblotched rockfish would be unused by the C/P sector and could, therefore, be provided to the MS sector, which allowed the MS sector to continue fishing. Subsequently, the PFMC acted to reimburse the C/P sector 3.0 mt of darkblotched rockfish, which was (eventually) implemented by NMFS. B. C/P Cooperative s Actual Retained and Discarded Catch of Pacific Whiting, Salmon, Pacific Halibut, Rockfish, Groundfish, and Other Species on a Vessel-by-Vessel Basis Complete catch data for 2014 is provided in Table 1. Species are grouped per the advice of NMFS. 2

C. Description of the Method Used by the C/P Cooperative to Monitor Performance of Cooperative Vessels that Participated in the Fishery Each vessel in the C/P Cooperative carries two NMFS-certified observers to monitor and account for the catch of Pacific whiting and non-whiting groundfish allocations (i.e., canary rockfish, widow rockfish, darkblotched rockfish, and Pacific ocean perch), and to monitor and account for the catch of prohibited species. Observers report each vessel's catch on a daily basis to both the NMFS Observer Program in Seattle and to Sea State, Inc. (a private, third-party catch monitoring firm). For 2014, the C/P Cooperative contracted with Sea State, Inc. to process the catch data provided by the observer program and to provide in-season management support. Sea State regularly provides catch reports to each C/P vessel, the C/P fleet, and the C/P Cooperative. These reports may include cumulative fleet-wide and vessel-level catch data as well as tow-by-tow summaries. Fleet managers are able to reconcile the tow-by-tow catch information provided by Sea State against their own catch records to identify possible data errors and ensure accurate catch accounting throughout the fishing season. Sea State reports also provide a mechanism to identify and avoid fishing areas where incidental catch of overfished species and/or prohibited species is occurring. The C/P Cooperative has authorized Sea State, Inc. to identify specific fishing areas to be avoided as a mechanism to reduce catch of overfished species and/or prohibited species. Catch aboard C/P vessels is weighed using flow scales and motion-compensated platform scales. The flow scale is tested daily by the vessel to ensure the accuracy of the data collected by the NMFS-certified observer. Regulations at 50 CFR 660.15(b) state that the vessel operator is responsible for ensuring the vessel crew performs daily testing of all at-sea scales (belt and/or platform). In addition to regulatory requirements for the vessel operator, NMFS-certified observers are required to test the motion-compensated platform scale during their shift and to be present during testing of the flow scale (At-Sea Hake Observer Program Observer Sampling Manual, Version 2014). The species composition of the catch is determined by the NMFS-certified observer. Because two observers are aboard each vessel the number of hauls sampled are high, at or near 100 percent. C/P vessels endeavor to provide conditions that facilitate large samples of individual hauls. The use of two observers, flow and platform scales, and high rates of sampling leads to very accurate catch accounting for Pacific whiting, non-whiting groundfish, and prohibited species. The C/P Cooperative acknowledges and agrees that minimizing incidental catch of overfished species to the extent practicable is a primary objective of the C/P Cooperative. In general, incidental catch of overfished species in the C/P sector is very low. For 2014, each C/P Cooperative member agreed to employ bycatch avoidance techniques recommended by the PWCC Board of Directors and Sea State, Inc. Non-whiting groundfish species amounts (functionally, bycatch limits ) allocated by NMFS to the C/P sector were assigned to C/P Cooperative members proportional to their Pacific whiting allocations. These hard caps on incidental catch, if exceeded, would cause the C/P sector to cease fishing, thereby ensuring that C/P Cooperative catch of overfished species is minimized to the extent practicable. 3

D. Description of Any Actions Taken by the C/P Cooperative in Response to Any Vessels that Exceed Their Allowed Catch and Bycatch In 2014, no vessels exceeded their allowed catch or bycatch amounts. Minor adjustments to the harvest schedule may be made to accommodate the inseason needs of member vessels. For example, one member company may choose to provide small amounts of their percentage of the annual catcher processor allocation of catch or bycatch to another member company if the former company has completed operations for the year and the latter is still active in the fishery. E. Plans for the 2015 C/P Cooperative Fishery, Including the Companies Participating in the Cooperative, the Harvest Agreement, and Catch Monitoring and Reporting Requirements For 2015, companies participating in the C/P Cooperative include: AMERICAN SEAFOODS COMPANY LLC; GLACIER FISH COMPANY LLC; TRIDENT SEAFOODS CORPORATION 2015 C/P Cooperative Pacific Whiting Harvest Schedule: Member Percentage of Annual Catcher Processor Allocation American Seafoods Company LLC 49.4% Trident Seafoods Corporation 29.6% Glacier Fish Company LLC 21.0% 2015 C/P Cooperative Catch Monitoring and Reporting Requirements: Each member of the C/P Cooperative carries two NMFS-certified observers aboard each of its vessels to monitor and account for total catch, including catch of prohibited species. Observers report each vessel's daily catch to the NMFS Observer Program in Seattle and to Sea State. For 2015, the C/P Cooperative will contract with Sea State, Inc. to process the catch data provided by the observer program and to provide in-season management support. Sea State regularly provides catch reports to each C/P vessel, the C/P fleet, and the C/P Cooperative. These reports may include cumulative fleet-wide and vessel-level catch data as well as tow-bytow summaries. Fleet managers are able to reconcile the tow-by-tow catch information provided by Sea State against their own catch records to identify possible data errors and ensure accurate catch accounting throughout the fishing season. Catch aboard C/P vessels is weighed using flow scales and motion-compensated platform scales. The flow scale is tested daily by the vessel to ensure the accuracy of the data collected by the 4

NMFS-certified observer. Regulations at 50 CFR 660.15(b) state that the vessel operator is responsible for ensuring the vessel crew performs daily testing of all at-sea scales (belt and/or platform). In addition to regulatory requirements for the vessel operator, NMFS-certified observers are required to test the motion-compensated platform scale during their shift and to be present during testing of the flow scale (At-Sea Hake Observer Program Observer Sampling Manual, Version 2014). The species composition of the catch is determined by the NMFS-certified observer. Because two observers are aboard each vessel the number of hauls sampled are high, at or near 100 percent. C/P vessels endeavor to provide conditions that facilitate large samples of individual hauls. The use of two observers, flow and platform scales, and high rates of sampling leads to very accurate catch accounting for Pacific whiting, non-whiting groundfish, and prohibited species. ### 5

Table 1. Final 2014 Catcher-Processor Sector Total Catch American Dynasty American Triumph Northern Eagle Northern Jaeger Alaska Ocean Pacific Glacier Island Enterprise Kodiak Enterprise Seattle Enterprise Total ROUNDFISH (mt) Whiting 10,730.83 12,478.08 17,556.99 12,338.43 12,232.11 8,293.84 7,695.60 12,658.43 9,219.04 103,203.36 Pacific Cod Lingcod 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.04 Sablefish 0.44 2.57 4.12 1.09 1.02 0.05 5.16 0.53 0.27 15.24 FLATFISH (mt) Arrowtooth Flounder 0.65 0.43 3.84 0.68 1.13 0.06 1.78 0.16 0.06 8.79 Dover Sole 0.03 0.01 0.23 0.07 0.09 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.87 English Sole 0.01 0.00 0.01 Petrale Sole Starry Flounder Other Flatfish Rex Sole 0.69 0.22 2.57 0.32 0.80 0.24 2.54 0.18 0.02 7.59 Pacific Sanddab 0.00 0.0004 Flathead Sole 0.00 0.0001 Slender Sole 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 ROCKFISH (mt) Pacific Ocean Perch 0.04 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.09 0.02 0.00 0.32 Shortbelly Rockfish 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 Widow Rockfish 1.01 0.80 0.56 0.82 1.14 0.08 0.37 10.83 0.92 16.55 Canary Rockfish 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.28 Yellowtail Rockfish 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 Thornyhead Rockfish Unidentified 2.55 2.55 Shortspine Thornyhead 1.25 2.22 3.23 3.55 3.04 0.19 2.69 2.43 0.21 18.81 Longspine Thornyhead 0.00 0.002 Dark Blotched Rockfish 0.48 0.20 0.79 0.27 0.54 0.07 0.45 0.31 0.29 3.41 Yelloweye Rockfish Minor Shelf Rockfish North 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.07 Minor Slope Rockfish North 2.59 0.96 3.73 0.64 1.06 0.16 6.83 1.50 0.20 17.68 REMAINING GROUNDFISH (mt) Spiny Dogfish Shark 2.86 2.07 8.95 5.81 8.12 0.56 2.43 5.27 2.08 38.14 Longnose Skate 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.17 0.01 0.02 0.35 Other Groundfish 7.91 4.92 14.27 6.60 8.04 7.30 11.02 3.40 6.93 70.39 PROHIBITED and PROTECTED SPP Chinook Salmon (numbers of fish) 395.00 416.00 630.00 326.67 888.00 37.00 578.00 258.00 252.00 3,780.67 Chum Salmon (numbers of fish) Coho Salmon (numbers of fish) 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 8.00 Pink Salmon (numbers of fish) Sockeye Salmon (numbers of fish) Steelhead (numbers of fish) Salmon Unidentified (numbers of fish) 0.00 0.0005 Pacific Halibut (mt) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.04 Dungeness Crab (numbers of fish) Eulachon (mt) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 NON-GROUNDFISH SPP (mt) American Shad 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.09 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.20 Pacific Herring 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0001 Humboldt Squid Squid Unidentified 11.56 13.76 20.30 17.29 11.03 6.59 17.23 20.37 9.76 127.87 Jack Mackerel 26.97 0.65 3.46 1.57 1.61 0.25 1.25 14.19 1.52 51.48 Pacific Mackerel 0.06 0.03 18.05 0.23 1.13 0.00 2.46 15.75 0.34 38.05 Pacific Sardine 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.03 All Other Non-Groundfish 0.33 0.23 0.55 0.67 0.27 0.40 0.34 0.29 0.53 3.61