A Basis for Polynomial Solutions to Systems of Linear Constant Coefficient PDE's

Similar documents
LINEAR EQUATIONS WITH UNKNOWNS FROM A MULTIPLICATIVE GROUP IN A FUNCTION FIELD. To Professor Wolfgang Schmidt on his 75th birthday

Harmonic Polynomials and Dirichlet-Type Problems. 1. Derivatives of x 2 n

MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA

Section III.6. Factorization in Polynomial Rings

How many units can a commutative ring have?

Pacific Journal of Mathematics

TIGHT CLOSURE IN NON EQUIDIMENSIONAL RINGS ANURAG K. SINGH

WEAK NULLSTELLENSATZ

Factorization in Polynomial Rings


Derivatives of Harmonic Bergman and Bloch Functions on the Ball

MATH 431 PART 2: POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND FACTORIZATION

STABLY FREE MODULES KEITH CONRAD

Factorization of integer-valued polynomials with square-free denominator

PolynomialExponential Equations in Two Variables

S. Paul Smith and James J. Zhang

COUNTING SEPARABLE POLYNOMIALS IN Z/n[x]

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Polynomial Harmonic Decompositions

The only global contact transformations of order two or more are point transformations

Integral Similarity and Commutators of Integral Matrices Thomas J. Laffey and Robert Reams (University College Dublin, Ireland) Abstract

MODEL THEORY OF PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL FIELDS: FROM COMMUTING TO NONCOMMUTING DERIVATIONS

AN INEQUALITY INVOLVING TIGHT CLOSURE AND PARAMETER IDEALS. Dedicated to the memory of Professor Nicolae Radu

Injective semigroup-algebras

RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RIMS On self-intersection of singularity sets of fold maps. Tatsuro SHIMIZU.

Searching for Multigrades

January 2016 Qualifying Examination

Problems on Minkowski sums of convex lattice polytopes

Hilbert function, Betti numbers. Daniel Gromada

A note on Samelson products in the exceptional Lie groups

LIMITING CASES OF BOARDMAN S FIVE HALVES THEOREM

MATH 196, SECTION 57 (VIPUL NAIK)

A correction to Conducteur des Représentations du groupe linéaire

The Graph Isomorphism Problem and the Module Isomorphism Problem. Harm Derksen

Manoj K. Keshari 1 and Satya Mandal 2.

Lecture Notes Math 371: Algebra (Fall 2006) by Nathanael Leedom Ackerman

1. Group Theory Permutations.

Mathematical Journal of Okayama University

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ.

Math 120 HW 9 Solutions

50 Algebraic Extensions

James J. Madden LSU, Baton Rouge. Dedication: To the memory of Paul Conrad.

HILBERT FUNCTIONS. 1. Introduction

SPACES OF RATIONAL CURVES ON COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS

HILBERT BASIS OF THE LIPMAN SEMIGROUP

A Tilt at TILFs. Rod Nillsen University of Wollongong. This talk is dedicated to Gary H. Meisters

arxiv: v2 [math.ac] 25 Apr 2011

Math 418 Algebraic Geometry Notes

CYCLIC HOMOLOGY AND THE BEILINSON-MANIN-SCHECHTMAN CENTRAL EXTENSION. Ezra Getzler Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138

g(x) = 1 1 x = 1 + x + x2 + x 3 + is not a polynomial, since it doesn t have finite degree. g(x) is an example of a power series.

NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS

Chapter 2: Linear Independence and Bases

10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann

Primary Decompositions of Powers of Ideals. Irena Swanson

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 8 Nov 2008

On the Computation of the Adjoint Ideal of Curves with Ordinary Singularities

be any ring homomorphism and let s S be any element of S. Then there is a unique ring homomorphism

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 10 May 2013

THE CONE OF BETTI TABLES OVER THREE NON-COLLINEAR POINTS IN THE PLANE

58 CHAPTER 2. COMPUTATIONAL METHODS

VARIETIES WITHOUT EXTRA AUTOMORPHISMS II: HYPERELLIPTIC CURVES

THE NUMBER OF MULTIPLICATIONS ON //-SPACES OF TYPE (3, 7)

Generic section of a hyperplane arrangement and twisted Hurewicz maps

Computing syzygies with Gröbner bases

Boundary of Cohen-Macaulay cone and asymptotic behavior of system of ideals

Mathematical Olympiad Training Polynomials

THE REGULAR ELEMENT PROPERTY

CONSIDERATION OF COMPACT MINIMAL SURFACES IN 4-DIMENSIONAL FLAT TORI IN TERMS OF DEGENERATE GAUSS MAP

MULTIPLICATIVE FIBRE MAPS

Difference Equations for Multiple Charlier and Meixner Polynomials 1

REVISITED OSAMU FUJINO. Abstract. The main purpose of this paper is to make C n,n 1, which is the main theorem of [Ka1], more accessible.

Lecture Notes Math 371: Algebra (Fall 2006) by Nathanael Leedom Ackerman

arxiv: v1 [math.ac] 7 Feb 2009

Some examples of two-dimensional regular rings

A linear algebra proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra

RINGS: SUMMARY OF MATERIAL

DOES XY 2 = Z 2 IMPLY X IS A SQUARE?

COMPLEX PARALLISABLE MANIFOLDS

SOME INEQUALITIES FOR THE EUCLIDEAN OPERATOR RADIUS OF TWO OPERATORS IN HILBERT SPACES

An Introduction to Supersingular Elliptic Curves and Supersingular Primes

Problem 1A. Find the volume of the solid given by x 2 + z 2 1, y 2 + z 2 1. (Hint: 1. Solution: The volume is 1. Problem 2A.

Polynomials. Chapter 4

Quadratic Forms. Marco Schlichting Notes by Florian Bouyer. January 16, 2012

Solutions of exercise sheet 6

APPLICATIONS OF LOCAL COHOMOLOGY

Math 4320 Final Exam

Name: MAT 444 Test 4 Instructor: Helene Barcelo April 19, 2004

Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory

The Hilbert-Mumford Criterion

arxiv:alg-geom/ v1 21 Mar 1996

GROUP DUALITY AND ISOMORPHISMS OF FOURIER AND FOURIER-STIELTJES ALGEBRAS FROM A W*-ALGEBRA POINT OF VIEW

THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS

Arithmetic Analogues of Derivations

Projective Schemes with Degenerate General Hyperplane Section II

Canonical systems of basic invariants for unitary reflection groups

A CHARACTERIZATION OF LOCALLY FINITE VARIETIES THAT SATISFY A NONTRIVIAL CONGRUENCE IDENTITY

Sharp estimates for a class of hyperbolic pseudo-differential equations

Spherically Symmetric Logistic Distribution

arxiv: v1 [math.ac] 24 Feb 2010

Primitive sets in a lattice

Transcription:

advances in mathematics 7, 5763 (996) article no. 0005 A Basis for Polynomial Solutions to Systems of Linear Constant Coefficient PDE's Paul S. Pedersen Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mail Stop B265, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 Received January, 992 Let K represent either the real or the complex numbers. Let P k, k=, 2,..., r be constant coefficient (with coefficients from K) polynomials in n variables and let N M =[u(x)#k[x] M P k (x,..., x n ) u(x)=0; k=, 2,..., r] be the set of all polynomial solutions (of degree M) to this system of partial differential equations. We solve the problem of finding an easily computed basis for the vector space N M. To do this we use a certain associative, and commutative algebra (defined over K), namely K[;]=K[;, ; 2,..., ; n ] where [P k (;)=0 k=,..., r] and [; m ;m 2 2 }}};m n =0 m n +}}}+m n =M+]. Let the vector space K[;] M equal the span over K of [; m ;m 2 2 }}};m n n m +}}}+m n M]. We show how the expression M j=0 (x ; +}}}+x n ; n ) j j! can be used to find an easily computed basis for N M. 996 Academic Press, Inc. Introduction Let P k, k=, 2,..., r be polynomials in n variables (with coefficients from K) and let K[x] M represent the set of all polynomials of degree less than or equal M in x=(x, x 2,..., x n ) (throughout this paper K will represent either the complex or the real numbers). We will find an easily computed basis for the vector space N M = {u # K[x] M } P k\ x,..., x n+ u=0; k=, 2,..., r =. () As the introduction in [] points out, the problem of finding a basis for the vector space () is both natural and basic. [] also points out that little has been done in addressing the general problem. In that same paper a method is discussed for finding a basis for N M when [w # C n P k (w), k=,..., r] is smooth and irreducible. In [2] and [3] a method was 57 000-870896 2.00 Copyright 996 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

58 paul s. pedersen developed for finding a basis in a large number of cases where the P k are of homogeneous order. In discussing a closely related question, Stiller and, in earlier work, Michelli established various facts regarding the dimension of N M when the P k are also of homogeneous order (see [4]). There have also been numerous publications discussing polynomial solutions for special cases of (). For example, much has been written about polynomial solutions to Laplace's equation in several variables (see any book discussing spherical harmonics; see e.g., []). The method presented in this paper extends the method appearing in [2] and [3] and is distinct from the methods presented by other authors. Furthermore, our method is simple and will give a basis for all cases of (). It is well know that the real and imaginary parts of polynomials in z=x +x 2 i form a basis for the set of all polynomial solutions to Laplace's equation ( 2 x 2 +2 x 2 2 ) u(x, x 2 )=0. We will be guided by the similarity between the algebraic relationship 2 +i 2 =0 (which relates the elements which form a basis for the complex number system) and the form of the 2 dimensional Laplacean operator. Specifically, to find all polynomial solutions in (), we use a finitely generated, commutative, and associative algebra K[;]=K[;, ; 2,..., ; n ] whose generators satisfy the system of algebraic equations and [P k (;)=0 k=, 2,..., r] [; m ;m 2 2 }}};m n n =0 m +}}}+m n =M+] (2) We show how the expression M j= (n i= x i ; i ) j j! can be used to find a basis for N M. Notation. We let N be the set of non-negative integers and we let C represent the complex numbers. A symbol w will generally represent the ordered n-tuple (w, w 2,..., w n ) and [w] will represent the set [w, w 2,..., w n ]. As is usual, K[w] will represent the set of all polynomials in w, w 2,..., w n. For M in N, K[w] M will equal the vector space spanned by all polynomials of degree M and K[w] M will equal the vector space spanned by all polynomials degree less than or equal M. We use the standard notation of letting w m represent w m w m 2 2 }}}wm n n where m= (m, m 2,..., m n )isinn n. For m in N n we define m =m +m 2 +}}}+m n and let N n =[m # M Nn m M], X m =x m xm 2 2 }}}xm n m n!m 2!}}}m n! and D m =D m }}}Dm n n =m +}}}+m n x m }}}xm n. Also, for m in n Zn &N n we set X m =0. So, for example, for any i, j in N n we have D i X j =X j&i.

bases 59 A Pairing of Vector Spaces General references for the material in this section are [5, pp. 628] and [6, p. 39] and [, p. 558]. The function (, ): C[x]_C[D] C defined by (f(x), P(D))=P (D) f(x) 0 (we apply the complex conjugate of the operator P(D) tof(x) and then evaluate the result at 0) is bilinear. Since D j X j = we see that (, ) is non-degenerate. Also since (X i, D j )=$ ij, [D j ] and [X j ] for j in N n are dual bases. Let C[D]*=Hom(C[D], C). Since (, ) is non-degenerate there is a linear isomorphism 8: C[D]*C[x] given by the following conditions: For 9 # C[D]* we have 8(9)=f (f,q)=9(q) for all Q # C[D]. Let P (D),..., P r (D) be polynomials in C[D] of any degrees. We extend this set of polynomials to P (D),..., P r (D),..., P v (D), by joining the elements of [D m m =M+]. Let J=(P (D),..., P v (D)) /C[D] (the ideal generated by P (D),..., P v (D)) and let J M =J & C[D] M. We also let N=[f(x)#C[x] (f(x), P i (D))=0 for i=, 2,..., v] and N M = N & C[x] M (it is easy to verify that this is the same N M that we defined in ()). J M and N M are, of course, vector spaces. The restriction (, ) M of (, ) to C[x] M _C[D] M is still bilinear and non-degenerate. Therefore 8=C[D]* M C[x] M is given by 8(9)=f (f,q) M = 9(Q) for all Q # C[D] M. Lemma. N M $J = M. Proof. Choose a basis Q (D),..., Q t (D) for C[D] M so that Q s+ (D),..., Q t (D) is a basis for J M. (3) Therefore N M =[f(x)#c[x] M (f(x), Q i (D)) M =0 for i=s+,..., t]. Let 9,..., 9 t # C[D]* M be dual to Q (D),..., Q t (D) which is to say that 9 i (Q j (D))=$ ij for all i, j such that i, jt. Set f i =8(9 i ) for i=,..., t. (4) Since the 9 i are linearly independent in C[D]* M the f i form a basis for C[x] M. Now (f i (x), Q j (D)) M =9 i (Q j (D))=$ ij implies that f (x),..., f s (x) forms a basis for C[x] M.

60 paul s. pedersen Lemma 2. Let z=z(d, M)= : m M Then 8(9)=f(x) if and only if (9)z=f(x). X m D m. (5) Proof. Let f(x)= m M a m X m #C[x] M. Then ( 9)z= m M X m 9(D m )= m M X m (f(x), D m ) M = m M X m ( p M a p X p, D m ) M =f(x). Corollary 3. For Q i (D) in (3), f i (x) in (4) and z in (5) we have t z= : i= f i (x)q i (D). (6) Proof. By a change of basis in (5) we can find h i (x) so that z= t h i= i(x)q i (D). Hence f j (x)=(9 j )z= t h i= i(x) 9 j (Q i (D))= h j (x). The point of Corollary 3 is that for any pair of dual bases [f i (x)] and [Q i (D)] we have (6). Theorem 4. Let ; i represent the class of x i in the residue class ring C[x,..., x n ](P (x,..., x n ),..., P v (x,..., x n )). Let C[D] M have basis [Q i (D) i=,..., t] where [Q i (;)=0 i=s+,..., t]. Then there exist f i (x) so that z(;, M)= s i= f i (x)q i (;) and [ f i (x) i=,..., s] forms a basis for N M. Proof. By definition of the ; i we have that P j (;)=0 for j=, 2,..., v, that Q j (;)=0 for j=s+,..., t and that Q (;),..., Q s (;) forms a basis for C[;] M. We apply vector space homomorphism C[x]C[D] C[x]C[;] (where D j ; j )toz(d,m) to get z(;, M)= t f i= i(x) Q i (;)= s f i= i(x)q i (;). The proof of Lemma shows that [f i (x) i=,..., s] forms a basis for N M. Remarks. () The preceeding arguments work if we are finding real solutions to a system of real coefficient PDE's. (2) There always exist subsets I of N n so that M [;m m#i] is a basis for C[;] M. (3) It is easy to verify that z(;, M)= n j=0 (M x i= i ; i ) j j!. (4) If J M =(P (D),..., P v (D)) contains then N M =[0] and there are no polynomial solutions.

bases 6 (5) If the P k (D), k=,..., r are of homogeneous order then N= N M=0 M and there is a basis of N consisting of homogeneous elements. We can find a basis for N M by finding a basis for C[;] M and rewriting ( n x i= i ; i ) M in terms of this basis. So if C[;] M has basis Q (;),..., Q s (;) then there exist f (x),..., f s (x) (homogeneous, degree M) so that ( n x i= i ; i ) M = s f i= i(x)q i (;) and we may conclude that f (x),..., f s (x) forms a basis for N M. Examples. () Let P(D)=( 2 x 2 +2 x 2 ). Let R[x 2,x 2 ] (P(D), D M+, D M D 2,..., D M+ 2 )$R[;, ; 2 ]. Therefore ; 2 +;2 2 =0 and it is not hard to verify that R[;] M has basis [; k, ;k& ; 2 0kM]. Now we can find f k, (x), f k,2 (x), k=0,,..., M so that z(;, M)= M f k=0 k,(x); k +f k,2(x); k& ; 2. Theorem 4 implies that f k, (x), f k,2 (x), k=0,,..., M form a basis for the set of all polynomial solutions to Laplace's equation having degree M. These solutions are in fact the same as the solutions one gets by finding the real and imaginary parts of the functions (x +x 2 i) k, k=0,..., M. If we use Remark 5 in this example, we have that R[;] M has basis [; M, ;M& ; 2 ]. We then get that (x ; + x 2 ; 2 ) M =f M, (x); M +f M,2(x); M& ; 2 and we may conclude that f M, (x) and f M,2 (x) form a basis for N M. (2) Let P(D)=( 2 x 2 &x 2) and let R[x 2,x 2](P(D), D 4, D 3 D 2,..., D 4 2 ) $R[;, ; 2 ] where ; 2 &; 2=0 and [; m =0 m =4]. Now R[;] 3 has basis, ;, ; 2, ; ; 2 and using this basis we have that z(;, 3)=+x ; +(x 2 +x 2 2); 2+(x x 2 +x 3 6); ; 2. We conclude that the four coefficients, x, (x 2 +x 2 2), (x x 2 +x 3 6) form a basis for all real polynomial solutions to the heat equation having degree 3. (3) Let P (D)= 2 x 2 +2 x 2 2 +2 x 2 3 and P 2 (D)=(x ) (x 2 )+(x )(x 3 )+(x 2 )(x 3 ). We will find a basis for the complex vector space N 3 by using Remark 5. To find these solutions we form the algebra C[;] generated by ; i, i=, 2, 3 where ; 2 +;2 2 +;2=0, 3 ; ; 2 +; ; 3 +; 2 ; 3 =0 and [; m =0 m =4]. Now C[;] 3 has basis ; 3, ; 2 ; 2, ; 2 ; 3, ; ; 2 2. We leave it to the reader to verify that these elements are indeed linearly independent in C[;] 3. The following table shows how the other elements of C[;] 3 can be written in terms of these elements. ; ; 2 3 =&;3 &; ; 2 2, ; ; 2 ; 3 =&; 2 ; 2&; 2 ; 3, ; 3 2 =&;3 &2;2 ; 2&; 2 ; 3&; ; 2 2, ;2 2 ; 3=; 2 ; 2+; 2 ; 3&; ; 2 2, ; 2 ; 2 3 =;3 +;2 ; 2+; 2 ; 3+; ; 2 2, ;3 3 =&;2 ; 2&2; 2 ; 3+; ; 2 2.

62 paul s. pedersen In ( 3 i= x i ; i ) 3 we replace the ; m by the appropriate linear combination of our basis elements as given in the table. Collecting terms we get 3 3 \ : x i ; i= i+ =(x 3 6&x x 2 3 2&x3 2 6+x 2x 2 3 2);3 +(x 2 x 2 2&x x 2 x 3 &x 3 23+x 2 2x 3 2+x 2 x 2 32&x 3 36); 2 ; 2 +(x 2 x 32&x x 2 x 3 &x 3 2 6+x2x 2 32+x 2 x 2 3 2&x3 3 3);2; 3 +(x x 2 2&x 2 x 2 3 2&x3 2 6&x2x 2 32+x 2 x 2 3 2+x36); 3 ; 2. 2 Theorem 4 tells us that these four coefficients of the basis elements form a basis for N 3. The Hilbert Characteristic Function If P (x,..., x n ),..., P r (x,..., x n ) are of homogeneous order, then J=(P (x,..., x n ),..., P r (x,..., x n )) is a homogeneous ideal and the number of linearly independent forms of degree M in the residue class ring C[x,..., x n ]J is designated /(J;M). The function / is called the Hilbert characteristic function of the ideal. A consequence of Lemma is that /(J; M)=dim N M. Other papers have noted that this equality holds for sufficiently large M (see [4]). As a corollary to this observation we have that dim N M is a polynomial in M for sufficiently large M (see, for example, [7, pp. 230237]). Polynomial and C Solutions to Systems References [8, 9, and ] discuss the relationship between polynomial solutions and C solutions to systems of constant coefficient PDE's. [0] and [9] discuss how one may find a basis for the C solutions to the system [u # C P k (x,..., x n ) u=0; k=, 2,..., r] by using functions of the form Q(x)e n i=0 x ia i where [: # C n P k (:)=0, k=, 2,..., r] and where the Q(x) are certain unspecified polynomials. However this later work does not allow one to find a polynomial basis for the system. Acknowledgment The author thanks an anonymous referee who made suggestions that greatly simplified an earlier form of this paper.

bases 63 References. S. P. Smith, Polynomial solutions to constant coefficient differential equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 329, No. 2 (992), 55569. 2. P. Pedersen, A function theory for finding all polynomial solutions to a linear constant coefficient PDE's of homogeneous order, J. Complex Variables 24 (993), 7987. 3. P. Pedersen, Analytic solutions to a class of PDE's with constant coefficients, J. Differential Integral Equations 3, No. 4 (990), 72732. 4. P. J. Stiller, Vector bundles on complex projective spaces and systems of partial differential equations, I, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 298, No. 2 (986), 537548. 5. W. H. Greub, ``Linear Algebra,'' Springer-Verlag, New York, 967. 6. E. M. Stein and G. Weiss, ``Introduction to Fourier Analysis on Euclidean Spaces,'' Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 97. 7. O. Zariski and P. Samuel, ``Commutative Algebra, Vol. II,'' van Nostrand, New York, 958. 8. B. Malgrange, Existence et approximation des solutions des e quations de convolution, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 6 (955), 27355. 9. F. Treves, ``Linear Partial Differential Operators,'' Gordon and Breach, New York, 970. 0. L. Ehrenpreis, A fundamental principle for systems of linear differential equations with constant coefficients, in ``Proceedings International Symposium on Linear Spaces, Jerusalem, 96,'' p. 6.. O. Kellogg, ``Foundations of Potential Theory,'' Verlag von Julius Springer, Berlin, 929. Printed in Belgium Uitgever: Academic Press, Inc. Verantwoordelijke uitgever voor Belgie : Hubert Van Maele Altenastraat 20, B-830 Sint-Kruis