Project Engineer: Wesley Kinkler Project Number: 4.14 Submission Date: 11/15/2003. TAMUK Truss Company Trusses Made Simple

Similar documents
COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS)

Post Graduate Diploma in Mechanical Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method

Linear Static Analysis of a Simply-Supported Truss (SI)

The Design of Polyurethane Parts: Using Closed Solutions and Finite Element Analysis to Obtain Optimal Results

[5] Stress and Strain

Lecture 8: Flexibility Method. Example

Name (Print) ME Mechanics of Materials Exam # 1 Date: October 5, 2016 Time: 8:00 10:00 PM

2. Rigid bar ABC supports a weight of W = 50 kn. Bar ABC is pinned at A and supported at B by rod (1). What is the axial force in rod (1)?

Section Downloads. Section Downloads. Handouts & Slides can be printed. Other documents cannot be printed Course binders are available for purchase

Two Tier projects for students in ME 160 class

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola

Mechanics of Materials

1.105 Solid Mechanics Laboratory Fall 2003

1 of 12. Given: Law of Cosines: C. Law of Sines: Stress = E = G

Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Module - 01 Lecture - 13

Cable Tension APPENDIX D. Objectives: Demonstrate the use of elastic-plastic material properties. Create an enforced displacement on the model.

Introduction to Finite Element Analysis Using Pro/MECHANICA Wildfire 5.0

Due Monday, September 14 th, 12:00 midnight

Due Tuesday, September 21 st, 12:00 midnight

Using Thermal Boundary Conditions in SOLIDWORKS Simulation to Simulate a Press Fit Connection

Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. Preliminary Qualifying Examination Solid Mechanics February 25, 2002

Arberi Ferraj. Wentworth Institute of Technology. Design of Machine Elements MECH 420

Workshop 8. Lateral Buckling

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF A WESTFALL 2800 MIXER, BETA = 0.8 GFS R1. By Kimbal A. Hall, PE. Submitted to: WESTFALL MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Due Date 1 (for confirmation of final grade): Monday May 10 at 11:59pm Due Date 2 (absolute latest possible submission): Friday May 14 at 5pm

Stress analysis of a stepped bar

TINIUS OLSEN Testing Machine Co., Inc.

ME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft.

Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Module - 01 Lecture - 11

4 Finite Element Method for Trusses

Please review the following statement: I certify that I have not given unauthorized aid nor have I received aid in the completion of this exam.

Sstan builds the global equation R = KG*r starting at the element level just like you did by hand

Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Module - 01 Lecture - 12

INTRODUCTION TO STRAIN

Module 10: Free Vibration of an Undampened 1D Cantilever Beam

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

Solid Mechanics Homework Answers

Trigonometry. Pythagorean Theorem. Force Components. Components of Force. hypotenuse. hypotenuse

General elastic beam with an elastic foundation

Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams

Institute of Structural Engineering Page 1. Method of Finite Elements I. Chapter 2. The Direct Stiffness Method. Method of Finite Elements I

NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines:

Mechanical Properties of Materials

CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES TRUSS ANALYSIS. Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20. First: determine loads in various members

Final Exam - Spring

Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Lecture - 06

Institute of Structural Engineering Page 1. Method of Finite Elements I. Chapter 2. The Direct Stiffness Method. Method of Finite Elements I

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

Engineering Mechanics Prof. U. S. Dixit Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Introduction to vibration

Figure 1: Throwing arm dimensions

Multi-Point Constraints

Module 2: Thermal Stresses in a 1D Beam Fixed at Both Ends

3.032 Problem Set 1 Fall 2007 Due: Start of Lecture,

If the solution does not follow a logical thought process, it will be assumed in error.

Level 7 Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method

A Simple Problem Which Students Can Solve and Check Using an Inexpensive Calculator

Lab Exercise #5: Tension and Bending with Strain Gages

CAAM 335 Matrix Analysis Planar Trusses

ME345 Modeling and Simulation, Spring 2018 Case Study 3 Assigned: Friday April 20

Free Body Diagram: Solution: The maximum load which can be safely supported by EACH of the support members is: ANS: A =0.217 in 2

Physics 8 Monday, November 20, 2017

Quintic beam closed form matrices (revised 2/21, 2/23/12) General elastic beam with an elastic foundation

ME 475 Modal Analysis of a Tapered Beam

k 21 k 22 k 23 k 24 k 31 k 32 k 33 k 34 k 41 k 42 k 43 k 44

STATICALLY INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

ENGN1300: Structural Analysis

Integrating ANSYS with Modern Numerical Optimization Technology Part I : Conjugate Feasible Direction Method

A two-dimensional FE truss program

1 of 7. Law of Sines: Stress = E = G. Deformation due to Temperature: Δ

ARC 341 Structural Analysis II. Lecture 10: MM1.3 MM1.13

BOOK OF COURSE WORKS ON STRENGTH OF MATERIALS FOR THE 2 ND YEAR STUDENTS OF THE UACEG

Mixed Review Write an equation for each problem. Then solve the equation. 1. The difference between 70 and a number is 2. A number minus 13 is 1.

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination Analysis

1.105 Solid Mechanics Laboratory Fall 2003 Experiment 3 The Tension Test

Laboratory 4 Topic: Buckling

Tutorial #1 - CivE. 205 Name: I.D:

1 332 Laboratories 1. 2 Computational Exercises 1 FEA of a Cantilever Beam... 1 Experimental Laboratory: Tensile Testing of Materials...

Mechanics of Materials

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

Theory of structure I 2006/2013. Chapter one DETERMINACY & INDETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES

Finite Element Solutions for Geotechnical Engineering

Section Downloads. Section Downloads. Handouts & Slides can be printed. Course binders are available for purchase. Download & Print. Version 2.

CIV 207 Winter For practice

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS REVIEW

Structural System, Machines and Load Cases

Flexural-Torsional Buckling of General Cold-Formed Steel Columns with Unequal Unbraced Lengths

Alvaro F. M. Azevedo A. Adão da Fonseca

ME 243. Mechanics of Solids

Flitched Beams. Strain Compatibility. Architecture 544 Wood Structures. Strain Compatibility Transformed Sections Flitched Beams

MAAE 2202 A. Come to the PASS workshop with your mock exam complete. During the workshop you can work with other students to review your work.

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

Structural Dynamics. Spring mass system. The spring force is given by and F(t) is the driving force. Start by applying Newton s second law (F=ma).

Vectors. In kinematics, the simplest concept is position, so let s begin with a position vector shown below:

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

Electrical Theory. Mathematics Review. PJM State & Member Training Dept. PJM /22/2018

Mechanics of Materials Primer

Chapter Two: Mechanical Properties of materials

RODS: THERMAL STRESS AND STRESS CONCENTRATION

Chapter 11. Displacement Method of Analysis Slope Deflection Method

Transcription:

Submission Date: 11/15/2003 TAMUK Truss Company Trusses Made Simple

Table of Contents Introduction..3 Proposal.3 Solution..5 Hand Calculations 5 TRUSS2D 7 NENastran 7 Comparison of Results... 8 Data Analysis.10 Removal of 0 Force Members 10 Modification Structural Elements..11 Conclusion..12 Appendices.13 Appendix A: Tables..13 Appendix B: Figures.....15 Appendix C: Data. 20 2

Introduction A simple truss system will be evaluated using hand calculations and finite element software, TRUSS2D and NENastran. Nodal displacements, elements forces, element stresses, and factors of safety for each element will be calculated. The truss setup is explained in the proposal. Methods of calculation and use of programs are exhibited in the solution section. The results of the calculations are compiled and compared in the comparison of results section. There are some alterations proposed for the current design of the truss. These alterations are discussed in the data analysis section. Proposal An eleven-element truss system has been proposed to support a 150,000-pound force. A two-dimensional representation of the model is shown in Figure 1a and Figure 1b: Figure 1: Two-Dimensional Truss Layout 7ft. 9ft. 9ft. 9ft. 150000 lbs. 9ft. y x AISI 4340 Steel E=30,000,000 psi 3

Figure 1b: Node and Element Identification 6 e11 7 e5 e6 e7 e8 e9 e10 1 e1 2 e2 3 e3 4 e4 5 Figure 1a gives the dimensions of the truss system, the load placement, and the support layout. Figure 1b shows the node identification numbers (1-7) and element identification numbers (e1-e11). Elements e1, e2, e3, e4, e6, and e9 are twelve-inch area rods, and bolded elements e5, e7, e8, e10, and e11 are eighteen-inch area rods. The rods are made from AISI 4340 steel with a modified Young s modulus of 30,000,000 pounds per square inch. A support at node 3 prevents movement in the vertical (y) direction and a support at node 5 prevents movement in both the horizontal and vertical (x and y) directions. The 150,000-pound force will be set at node 1 in the negative y direction. The truss is evaluated for translation at each node, stresses in each member, and reactions at the supports. Failure analysis and a factor of safety are calculated using the Max Stress Failure criteria. Truss analysis is done by hand and by computer programs TRUSS2D, a two dimensional truss analysis program in Excel Visual Basic, and NENastran, a finite element analysis package. 4

Solution The truss is initially evaluated by hand. The results are then checked with TRUSS2D and NENastran. Figure 2 shows the forces in each element. Hand calculations, TRUSS2D input and output, and NENastran output are included in the appendix. Table 2 and Table 3 give a comparison of the hand calculations, the TRUSS2D output, and the NENastran output. Hand Calculations: The forces in each member and the reaction forces are calculated by balancing the forces in each node. An example of balancing forces at a node is shown in Figure 3. First, the forces at the reaction are determined by balancing the forces in the y direction. Then starting at node 1, the force in each member can be found by balancing the forces in the x and y directions. Figure 3 shows the forces for each element. Figure 4 gives the element forces and support reactions in kilo pounds (kip equals 1000 pounds). The maximum failure theory is used to determine the factor of safety for each element. The factor of safety for each element can be calculated by dividing the yield point stress by the beam s axial stress. A yield point stress of 60,000 pounds per square inch in tension and 60,000 pounds per square inch in compression is used for the calculations. If the factor of safety for a beam is calculated to be less than 1, the beam has failed. The factor of safety for each beam is shown in Table 1. 5

Table 1: Element Factor of Safety TAMUK Truss Company Factor of Safety Element Factor of Safety E1 3.20 E2 3.20 E3 3.20 E4 3.20 E5 3.99 E6 N/A E7 3.99 E8 3.99 E9 N/A E10 3.99 E11 2.40 According to Table 3, there were no failures. Elements e6 and e9 have a N/A in the factor of safety field because they are zero force members, and have no axial stress. Table 3 shows that element e11 has the lowest factor of safety at 2.4. The required factor of safety usually depends on types of service and industry standards. A factor of safety of around 1.5 is usually acceptable. Figure 3: Balancing Forces at Nodes e5 Reactive Force θ Given Load 150000 pounds e1 Reactive Force 6

Figure 4: Element Forces and Support Reactions 450 kips 270.416 kips 270.416 kips 270.416 kips 405.624 kips 0 kips 0 kips 225 kips 225 kips 225 kips 225 kips 150 kips 300 kips 150 kips TRUSS2D: TRUSS2D is an Excel Visual Basic program that analyzes two dimensional truss systems only. The number of nodes, number of elements, number and location of degrees of freedom, node location, element orientation with respect to the nodes, area of elements, load and load placement, and material properties are all needed to analyze a truss. TRUSS2D will output nodal displacements, element stresses, and support reactive forces when given the numerical representation of the truss. The element forces can then be calculated by multiplying the element stress by the element area. TRUSS2D input, input legend, and output can be found in Appendix C, Data 1, Data 2, and Data 3 respectively. NENastran: NENastran is a finite element package that is capable of analyzing many different types structures. To analyze this truss, the modeler must be used to draw the structure. First a material is selected. AISI 4340 steel is used in this analysis, but the Young s modulus has been changed to 30,000,000 pounds per square inch. Then the properties for the two different rods are set up, using areas of 12 square inches and 18 square inches for this 7

problem. Next, elements are drawn from node to node. Constraints are then set at node 3 and node 5. Node three is restrained in the y and z directions, and retrained from rotation about the x, y, and z axis. Node 4 is fixed, so there is no translation or rotation. Then the load is set at node 1 in the negative y direction. Figure 6 of Appendix B shows the truss layout in the NENastran Modeler. Once all the information is entered, the analysis can be run. The output can be sent directly to the printer, displayed in a list file, and displayed in a window directly below the viewing window. The outputs include total translation, CBAR forces, and CBAR stresses. NENastran can also display a deformed model of the truss. Deformation of the truss is shown in Figure 7 of appendix B. Note that deformations are exaggerated and not to scale. Comparison of Results The results of the hand calculations, the TRUSS2D and NENastran outputs are compiled in Table 2 and Table 3. The tables show that the forces and stresses are the same from all three methods of calculation. Table 4 displays a comparison of nodal displacements given by TRUSS2D and NENastran. 8

Table 2: Element Force Comparison TAMUK Truss Company Force Comparison Element Hand TRUSS2D NENastran e1-225000.0000-225000.0000-225000.0000 e2-225000.0000-225000.0000-225000.0000 e3-225000.0000-225000.0000-225000.0000 e4-225000.0000-225000.0000-225000.0000 e5 270416.3457 270416.3457 270416.3000 e6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 e7-270416.3457-270416.3457-270416.3000 e8-270416.3457-270416.3457-270416.3000 e9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 e10 270416.3457 270416.3457 270416.3000 e11 450000.0000 450000.0000 450000.0000 Table 3: Element Stress Comparison TAMUK Truss Company Stress Comparison Element Hand TRUSS2D NENastran e1-18750.0000-18750.0000-18750.0000 e2-18750.0000-18750.0000-18750.0000 e3-18750.0000-18750.0000-18750.0000 e4-18750.0000-18750.0000-18750.0000 e5 15023.1303 15023.1303 15023.1300 e6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 e7-15023.1303-15023.1303-15023.1300 e8-15023.1303-15023.1303-15023.1300 e9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 e10 15023.1303 15023.1303 15023.1300 e11 25000.0000 25000.0000 25000.0000 Note that the forces and stresses for elements e5, e10, and e11 are all negative. The negative solution shows the members to be in compression, the remaining elements are in tension. Element e11 is the most heavily loaded element at 450,000 lbs. Elements e6 and e9 are both zero force members. 9

The nodal displacements given by TRUSS2D and NENastran differ. Table 4 lists the displacements in the x and y direction for each node given by both programs. Table 4: Nodal Displacements TAMUK Truss Company Translation Comparison TRUSS2D NENastran Node x-displacement y-displacement x-displacement y-displacement 1 2.70E-01-1.41E+00 2.70E-01-1.41E+00 2 2.03E-01-6.06E-01 2.03E-01-6.06E-01 3 1.35E-01-2.41E-06 1.35E-01 0.00E+00 4 6.75E-02 1.01E-01 6.75E-02 1.01E-01 5-5.39E-22 1.21E-06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 6-1.91E-01-6.06E-01-1.91E-01-6.06E-01 7-1.06E-02 1.01E-01-1.06E-02 1.01E-01 TRUSS2D gives small displacements at node 3 in the y direction and at node 5 in the x and y directions. The Penalty method gives such answers. The displacements are so small, they are considered to be 0. Other than the differences due to the Penalty method, TRUSS2D and NENastran agree on nodal displacements. The maximum x and y displacements are at node 1 with 0.27 and 1.41 inches of movement respectively. Data Analysis Analysis of the data shows that a few design alterations that can be made that will save in material costs, without significantly changing the displacements of the nodes. Removal of 0 Force Members: First, the 0 force members e6 and e9 can be eliminated. These rods carry no force and therefore they are not needed. Figure 8 of Appendix B gives a model of the truss in NENastran without the 0 force members. Table 5 of Appendix A shows a comparison of 10

the displacements for the original structure, which will be referred to as Structure 1, and structure with out the zero force members, which will be referred to as Structure 2. Note that nodes 2 and 4 are no longer present in the modified structure. A model of Structure 2 deformed is shown in Figure 9 of Appendix B. Since the displacements are the same, the stresses in each member will be the same. Modifying Structural Elements: The cross sectional area of the rods may also be decreased in order to save on material costs. The diameter of the 18 square inch rod is 4.787 inches, and the diameter of the 12 square inch area rod is 3.9088 inches. If all of the members were constructed of 4 inch diameter, 12.5664 square inch area, rods, the nodal displacement at the load would only drop 0.3593 inches in the y direction. Which is minimal compared to the overall length of the truss members. The axial stress in the most heavily loaded bar is increased by 43%, but the factor of safety is still 1.68, well above the 1.5 standard. By removing the 0 force members and changing the dimensions of the materials of construction, 5,478 cubic inches of steel can be saved. AISI 4340 steel has a density of 0.283 pounds per cubic inch. Although the body force of the structure was not considered in the analysis, the weight of the structure is reduced by 7.6% of the total weight, or 1,550 pounds. A representation of Structure 3 deformed is given in Figure 10 of Appendix B. Table 6 of Appendix A gives a comparison of the displacements of the Structure 2 and the modified structure with no zero force members, which will now be called Structure 3. Figure 5 shows the new identification numbers for structures 2 and 3. Table 7 of Appendix A compares the stresses in each element, and Table 8 of Appendix A will show the differences in the factors of safety. 11

Figure 5: Node and Element Identification for Structure 2 and Structure 3 6 e7 7 e3 e4 e5 e6 1 e1 3 e2 5 Conclusion: Three methods of calculations are used to analyze the truss system of Project Number 4.14. The hand calculations, TRUSS2D and NENastran outputs all prove to be similar. Analysis software like TRUSS2D and NENastran allow for quick modification of the structure or structural elements. Removing the 0 force members, e6 and e9, proved to have no effect on the structures displacements or stresses. Significantly reducing the cross sectional area of the larger rods and slightly increasing the area of the smaller rods showed to have little effect on the displacement at the load, while reducing the weight by 7.7%. The factors of safety for the modified structure remain high. Analysis of the structure reveals that the truss is safe under its current design conditions, but some minor design changes will save money while keeping the truss safe. 12

Appendix A Tables Table 5: Displacements in Structure 1 and Structure 2 TAMUK Truss Company Translation Comparison Original Truss Zero Force Members Removed Node x-displacement y-displacement x-displacement y-displacement 1 0.2700-1.4100 0.2700-1.4137 2 0.2030-0.6060 N/A N/A 3 0.1350 0.0000 0.1350 0.0000 4 0.0675 0.1010 N/A N/A 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6-0.1910-0.6060-0.1906-0.6056 7-0.0106 0.1010-0.0106 0.1013 Table 6: Displacements in Structure 2 and Structure 3 TAMUK Truss Company Translation Comparison Structure 2 Structure 3 Node x-displacement y-displacement x-displacement y-displacement 1 0.2700-1.4137 0.2578-1.8316 3 0.1350 0.0000 0.1289 0.0000 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6-0.1906-0.6056-0.3053-0.8191 7-0.0106 0.1013-0.0474 0.0967 13

Appendix A Tables Table 7: Stresses in Structure 2 and Structure 3 TAMUK Truss Company Stress Comparison Element Structure 2 Structure 3 e1-18750.00-17904.89 e2-18750.00-17904.89 e3 15023.13 21519.00 e4-15023.13-21519.00 e5-15023.13-21519.00 e6 15023.13 21519.00 e7 25000.00 35809.78 Table 8: Factor of Safety for Structure 2 and Structure 3 TAMUK Truss Company Factor of Safety Element Structure 2 Structure 3 e1 12.80 13.40 e2 12.80 13.40 e3 14.31 9.99 e4 15.98 11.15 e5 15.98 11.15 e6 14.31 9.99 e7 8.60 6.00 14

Appendix B Figures Figure 6: NENastran Model of Structure 1 15

Appendix B Figures Figure 7: NENastran Model of Structure 1 Deformed 16

Appendix B Figures Figure 8: NENastran Model of Structure 2 17

Appendix B Figures Figure 9: NENastran Model of Structure 2 Deformed 18

Appendix B Figures Figure 10: NENastran Model of Structure 3 Deformed 19

Data 1: TRUSS2D Input Appendix C Data << 2D TRUSS ANALYSIS USING BAND SOLVER>> Project Number 4.14 NN NE NM NDIM NEN NDN 7 11 1 2 2 2 ND NL NMPC 3 1 0 Node# X Y 1 0 0 2 108 0 3 216 0 4 324 0 5 432 0 6 108 72 7 324 72 Elem# N1 N2 Mat# Area TempRise 1 1 2 1 12 0 2 2 3 1 12 0 3 3 4 1 12 0 4 4 5 1 12 0 5 1 6 1 18 0 6 6 2 1 12 0 7 6 3 1 18 0 8 3 7 1 18 0 9 7 4 1 12 0 10 7 5 1 18 0 11 6 7 1 18 0 DOF# Displacement 6 0 9 0 10 0 DOF# Load Solve the Problem Delete Results Sheet 2-150000 MAT# E Alpha 1 3.00E+07 0.00E+00 B1 i B2 j B3(Multi-point constr. B1*Qi+B2*Qj=B3) 20

Data 2: TRUSS2D Input Legend Appendix C Data Input Legend: NN NE NM NDIM NEN NDN ND NL NMPC Node# Elem# Mat# Area TempRise DOF# Displacement Load E Alpha Number of nodes Number of elements Number of different materials Number of coordinates per node Number of nodes per element Number of degrees of freedom per node Number of boundary conditions Number of applied component loads Number of applied multipoint constraints Individual node - give x and y coordinate Individual elements - specify from node to node (N1 to N2) Specify which material Give cross sectional area of element Give change in temperature Give degree of freedom at which constraint or load will be applied Give displacement at that node (0 if constrained) Give load at degree of freedom Youngs modulus Coefficient of thermal expansion 21

Data 3: TRUSS2D Output Appendix C Data Results from Program TRUSS2D Project Number 4.14 Node# X-Displ Y-Displ 1 2.70E-01-1.41E+00 2 2.03E-01-6.06E-01 3 1.35E-01-2.41E-06 4 6.75E-02 1.01E-01 5-5.39E-22 1.21E-06 6-1.91E-01-6.06E-01 7-1.06E-02 1.01E-01 Elem# Stress 1-18750 2-18750 3-18750 4-18750 5 15023.13 6 0 7-15023.13 8-15023.13 9 0 10 15023.13 11 25000 DOF# Reaction 6 300000 9 6.7E-11 10-150000 22

Appendix C Data Data 3: NENastran Output for Structure 1 Translation X Y Z Rotation POINT T1 T2 T3 R1 R2 R3 1 2.70E-01-1.41E+00 0 0 0 0 2 2.03E-01-6.06E-01 0 0 0 0 3 1.35E-01 0 0 0 0 0 4 6.75E-02 1.01E-01 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6-1.91E-01-6.06E-01 0 0 0 0 7-1.06E-02 1.01E-01 0 0 0 0 Axial Force ELEMENT AXIAL ID. FORCE TORQUE 1-2.25E+05 0 2-2.25E+05 0 3-2.25E+05 0 4-2.25E+05 0 5 2.70E+05 0 6 0 0 7-2.70E+05 0 8-2.70E+05 0 9 0 0 10 2.70E+05 0 11 4.50E+05 0 Axial Stress ELEMENT AXIAL ID. STRESS 1-1.88E+04 2-1.88E+04 3-1.88E+04 4-1.88E+04 5 1.50E+04 6 0 7-1.50E+04 8-1.50E+04 9 0 10 1.50E+04 11 2.50E+04 23

Appendix C Data Data 4: NENastran Output for Structure 2 Translation X Y Z Rotation POINT T1 T2 T3 R1 R2 R3 1 2.70E-01-1.41E+00 0 0 0 0 3 1.35E-01 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6-1.91E-01-6.06E-01 0 0 0 0 7-1.06E-02 1.01E-01 0 0 0 0 Axial Force ELEMENT AXIAL ID. FORCE TORQUE 1-2.25E+05 0 2-2.25E+05 0 3 2.70E+05 0 4-2.70E+05 0 5-2.70E+05 0 6 2.70E+05 0 7 4.50E+05 0 Axial Stress ELEMENT AXIAL ID. STRESS 1-1.88E+04 2-1.88E+04 5 1.50E+04 7-1.50E+04 8-1.50E+04 10 1.50E+04 11 2.50E+04 24

Appendix C Data Data 5: NENastran Output for Structure 3 Translation X Y Z Rotation POINT T1 T2 T3 R1 R2 R3 1 2.58E-01-1.83E+00 0 0 0 0 3 1.29E-01 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6-3.05E-01-8.19E-01 0 0 0 0 7-4.74E-02 9.67E-02 0 0 0 0 Axial Stress ELEMENT AXIAL ID. STRESS 1-1.79E+04 2-1.79E+04 3 2.15E+04 4-2.15E+04 5-2.15E+04 6 2.15E+04 7 3.58E+04 25

Data 6: Hand Calculations Appendix C Data Balancing Forces at a Node The vertical component of the reactive force for e5 (see Figure 3) can be found by balancing the forces in the y direction. Equation 1 shows that the summation of the forces in the y direction is equal to 0, which is equal to the negative of the given load plus the y component of e5. This gives a y component value of 150,000 pounds. Theta (θ) is equal to the inverse tangent of the division of the y dimension of the element by x dimension of the element, which is shown in Equation 2. Using Equation 3, the reactive force of e5 can be found by dividing the y component by the sine of theta (θ), giving a force of 270,416 pounds. Then, using Equation 4, the x component of e5 can be found by multiplying the reactive force of e5 by the cosine of theta, which results in a force of 225,000 pounds. Finally, the reactive force of e1 is given by the summation of the forces in the x direction. According to Equation 5, the summation of the forces in the x direction is equal to 0, which is equal to the x component of e5 minus the reactive force of e1. This gives the reactive force of e1 to be 225,000 pounds. Reactive forces, which point away from the node, denote an element in tension, and reaction forces in the direction of the node denote an element in compression. Variations of equations 1 through 5 will solve for the forces in the rest of the elements Equation 1: ΣF y = 0 = -150000 + F e5y F e5y = 150000 pounds Equation 2: θ = tan -1 (y/x) = tan - (71/108) = 33.69 Equation 3: F e5 = F e5y /sin(θ) = 150000/sin(33.69 ) = 270416 pounds Equation 4: F e5x = cos(θ) F e5 = cos(33.69 ) 270416 = 225000 pounds Equation 5: ΣF x = 0 = F e5x - F e1x F e1x = -225000 pounds 26

Data 7: Hand Calculations Appendix C Data 27