Department of Economics, University of California, Davis Ecn 00C Micro Theory Professor Giacomo Bonanno ANSWERS TO PRACTICE PROBEMS 8. If price is Number of cars offered for sale Average quality of cars offered for sale. $500 (/8)00 = 5 000 $300 [(/8)+(3/8)]00=00 (/4)000+(3/4) 3000 = 750 $4600 (6/8)00 = 50 (/6)000+(3/6)3000+(/6)4000 = 366 $550 00 (all the cars) (/8)000+(3/8)(3000)+(/8)4000+(/8)5000=365 $600 00 (all the cars) (/8)000+(3/8)(3000)+(/8)4000+(/8)5000=365. Given price p, the only car-owners who are willing to sell are those whose θ is less than or equal to p. Thus, given p, the quality of the cars offered for sale is uniformly distributed in the interval [000, P], hence the average quality is p + 000 utility if the price is p is:. [ p + 000 ] p = 00 + 3 5 p p = 00 5 p. ence buyers are willing to buy only if [00 5. Thus the buyer s expected p] 0, i.e. only if p 3000. When p = 3000 supply equals demand (if there are at least as many buyers as sellers). Thus in this case there is a market for second-hand cars, even though the market is not efficient. Efficiency requires that all cars be sold, because buyers value them more than sellers do. Yet only of the cars are actually sold. It is still the case that bad cars drive good cars out of 4 the market, although not to the point of having only the lowest-quality cars up for sale. Page of 5
3. The wage offered by the employer is represented by the thick lines in the following diagram: + y/4 + y/4 y 0 y For example, if y 0 = 3, anybody with y = will be offered a salary of + /4 = 4 (even if he belongs to Group II, because the employer does not know to which group the applicant belongs) and anybody with y = 6 will be offered a salary of + 6/4 = 6 (even if he belongs to Group I). First of all, note that the only sensible choices are y = 0 and y = y 0. In fact, if you increase y by unit, you get an extra $(/4) but you pay more than this (you pay $ if you belong to Group I and $ 0.5 if you belong to Group II). Decision for a Group I person: wage cost net income y = 0 + 0/4 = 0 y = y 0 + y 0 /4 y 0 + y 0 /4 y 0 In equilibrium a Group I person chooses what the employer expects him to choose, namely y = 0. owever, it must be in his interest to make this choice, i.e. it must be the case that > + yo 4 yo Decision for a Group II person: wage cost net income y = 0 + 0/4 = 0 y = y 0 + y 0 /4 y 0 / + y 0 /4 y 0 / In equilibrium a Group II person chooses what the employer expects him to choose, namely y = y 0. owever, it must be in his interest to make this choice, i.e. it must be the case that + yo 4 yo >. These two inequalities are simultaneously satisfied if and only if 4 3 < y o < 4. Page of 5
4. (a) For contract C : h = 0,000, D = 5,000. For contract C : h =,000, D = 8,000. (b) The expected utility from is EU 0 = 0, 000 + 40, 000 = 0. The 0 0 expected utility from contract C is EU = 80, 000 + 65, 000 = 80.054 and the 0 0 expected utility from contract C is EU = 78, 000 + 70, 000 = 77.84. Thus the 0 0 individual would prefer not to insure. (c) The certain wealth that is on the same indifference curve as the point is given by the solution to w = 0 which is w = 84,00. Thus the maximum premium that the individual would be willing to pay for full insurance is 0,000 84,00 = 5,00. (d) The fair odds line is a straight line with slope W 850, 000 W =. It is shown below. W =. Thus it has equation 0 0 850,000 0,000 40 40 850,000 W wealth in bad state (e) Since she is risk averse she would choose the full insurance contract, given by the solution 850, 000 W to W = which is W = 85,000. Thus the contract would have a premium h = 5,000 and zero deductible. (f) The equilibrium would involve full insurance for both groups. Thus the type would get the same contract as under (e): h = 5,000, D = 0. For the type we need to first determine their fair odds line, which has slope = and is thus given by the equation 3,550,000 W 3,550,000 W W =. The solution to W = is W = 88,750. Thus their contract would be h =,50, D = 0. (g) A candidate for a separating equilibrium is the pair of contracts represented by points and in the diagram below. Page 3 of 5
W o 45 line 0,000 fair odds line for type with slope p p indifference curve of type W wealth in bad state fair odds line for p type, with slope p Point is the full insurance contract for the type, which we found under (f): h = 5,000, D = 0. To find point we need to calculate the intersection between the fair odds line for the 3,550,000 W type, which has equation W = and the indifference curve of the type that goes through point. Expected utility for the type at point is 85,000 =.548. Thus the indifference curve through point is given by the equation W + W = 85, 000. 0 0 Solving for W we get the equation for the indifference curve: 8,500, 000 + W 34, 000, 000W W =. Thus contract is given by the solution to 8 3,550,000 W 8,500, 000 + W 34, 000, 000W =, which is W 8 = 47,78.8 and the corresponding W is 3,550,000 47,78.8 = 8,80.08. Thus the contract for the type has h = 0,000 8,80.08 = 7. and D = 4,083.7. In order for this to be an equilibrium, there cannot be any points that lie strictly between the indifference curve for the -type that goes through contract and the average fair odds line. This we need the average fair-odds line to be below the -indifference curve that goes though contract, as shown in the following figure. Page 4 of 5
W o 45 line 0,000 fair odds line for type with slope p p indiff curve of type indifference curve of type fair odds line for type, with slope p p W average fair odds line wealth in bad state The average fair odds line has slope p + where p = α + ( α) =. Thus its slope p 0 40 40 + 50, 000 7 + is equal and the line is defined by the equation W = W. 3 Next we calculate the equation of the -indifference curve that goes through point. -type expected utility from contract is EU = 8,80.08 + 47, 78.8 = 7.64. Thus the 40 40 indifference curve is given by the equation W + W = 7.64, which can be written as 40 40 W = 3,0.87 5.66 W + 0.00W. Thus the necessary and sufficient condition for the pair of contracts found above to be an equilibrium is the following inequality, which says that the average fair odds line is weakly below the -indifference curve: 50, 000 7 + 3 3 α W 3,0.87 5.66 W 0.00W +, for every W When α = this inequality is satisfied and when α = 0 it is not. Thus the inequality can be interpreted and a condition on α namely that α be sufficiently large. Page 5 of 5