Quantitative characters - exercises

Similar documents
3. Properties of the relationship matrix

INTRODUCTION TO ANIMAL BREEDING. Lecture Nr 4. The efficiency of selection The selection programmes

MIXED MODELS THE GENERAL MIXED MODEL

INTRODUCTION TO ANIMAL BREEDING. Lecture Nr 2. Genetics of quantitative (multifactorial) traits What is known about such traits How they are modeled

The concept of breeding value. Gene251/351 Lecture 5

Lecture 5: BLUP (Best Linear Unbiased Predictors) of genetic values. Bruce Walsh lecture notes Tucson Winter Institute 9-11 Jan 2013

INTRODUCTION TO ANIMAL BREEDING. Lecture Nr 3. The genetic evaluation (for a single trait) The Estimated Breeding Values (EBV) The accuracy of EBVs

Mixed-Models. version 30 October 2011

Mixed-Model Estimation of genetic variances. Bruce Walsh lecture notes Uppsala EQG 2012 course version 28 Jan 2012

Maternal Genetic Models

Animal Model. 2. The association of alleles from the two parents is assumed to be at random.

Quantitative Genetics I: Traits controlled my many loci. Quantitative Genetics: Traits controlled my many loci

Reduced Animal Models

Repeated Records Animal Model

Best unbiased linear Prediction: Sire and Animal models

Estimating Breeding Values

Breeding Values and Inbreeding. Breeding Values and Inbreeding

Models with multiple random effects: Repeated Measures and Maternal effects

GBLUP and G matrices 1

Lecture 9. QTL Mapping 2: Outbred Populations

Variance Components: Phenotypic, Environmental and Genetic

Lecture 3. Introduction on Quantitative Genetics: I. Fisher s Variance Decomposition

Lecture 9. Short-Term Selection Response: Breeder s equation. Bruce Walsh lecture notes Synbreed course version 3 July 2013

Raphael Mrode. Training in quantitative genetics and genomics 30 May 10 June 2016 ILRI, Nairobi. Partner Logo. Partner Logo

... x. Variance NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES. Mice. Fruit Flies CHARACTERIZING A NORMAL DISTRIBUTION MEAN VARIANCE

Multiple random effects. Often there are several vectors of random effects. Covariance structure

Short-Term Selection Response: Breeder s equation. Bruce Walsh lecture notes Uppsala EQG course version 31 Jan 2012

1. they are influenced by many genetic loci. 2. they exhibit variation due to both genetic and environmental effects.

Lecture 4. Basic Designs for Estimation of Genetic Parameters

Genetic evaluation for three way crossbreeding

Lecture 13 Family Selection. Bruce Walsh lecture notes Synbreed course version 4 July 2013

Resemblance among relatives

Lecture WS Evolutionary Genetics Part I 1

Chapter 7 The Genetic Model for Quantitative Traits

Lecture 7 Correlated Characters

Quantitative characters

Lecture 11: Multiple trait models for QTL analysis

Lecture 2. Fisher s Variance Decomposition

Lecture 2. Basic Population and Quantitative Genetics

Quantitative characters

Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal cross model

Lecture 5 Basic Designs for Estimation of Genetic Parameters

Inbreeding depression due to stabilizing selection on a quantitative character. Emmanuelle Porcher & Russell Lande

Accounting for read depth in the analysis of genotyping-by-sequencing data

Common Mating Designs in Agricultural Research and Their Reliability in Estimation of Genetic Parameters

Evolutionary quantitative genetics and one-locus population genetics

Lecture 6: Introduction to Quantitative genetics. Bruce Walsh lecture notes Liege May 2011 course version 25 May 2011

Quantitative characters II: heritability

Effects of inbreeding on milk production, fertility, and somatic cell count in Norwegian Red

5. Best Linear Unbiased Prediction

Towards more uniform pig performance. Craig Lewis and Susanne Hermesch

Genetics and Genetic Prediction in Plant Breeding

VARIANCE COMPONENT ESTIMATION & BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION (BLUP)

Partitioning Genetic Variance

Just to review Genetics and Cells? How do Genetics and Cells Relate? The cell s NUCLEUS contains all the genetic information.

Genotyping strategy and reference population

Evolution of quantitative traits

Genetics Review Sheet Learning Target 11: Explain where and how an organism inherits its genetic information and this influences their

Lecture 6: Selection on Multiple Traits

Heinrich Grausgruber Department of Crop Sciences Division of Plant Breeding Konrad-Lorenz-Str Tulln

19. Genetic Drift. The biological context. There are four basic consequences of genetic drift:

Covariance between relatives

7.2: Natural Selection and Artificial Selection pg

Crosses. Computation APY Sherman-Woodbury «hybrid» model. Unknown parent groups Need to modify H to include them (Misztal et al., 2013) Metafounders

Genetic parameters for various random regression models to describe total sperm cells per ejaculate over the reproductive lifetime of boars

Lecture 9 Multi-Trait Models, Binary and Count Traits

Lecture 2: Introduction to Quantitative Genetics

Selection on Correlated Characters (notes only)

Legend: S spotted Genotypes: P1 SS & ss F1 Ss ss plain F2 (with ratio) 1SS :2 WSs: 1ss. Legend W white White bull 1 Ww red cows ww ww red

BS 50 Genetics and Genomics Week of Oct 3 Additional Practice Problems for Section. A/a ; B/B ; d/d X A/a ; b/b ; D/d

SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR CHAPTER 9

Modeling IBD for Pairs of Relatives. Biostatistics 666 Lecture 17

Resemblance between relatives

Lecture 3: Linear Models. Bruce Walsh lecture notes Uppsala EQG course version 28 Jan 2012

The phenotype of this worm is wild type. When both genes are mutant: The phenotype of this worm is double mutant Dpy and Unc phenotype.

Genetics and Natural Selection

LINEAR MODELS FOR THE PREDICTION OF ANIMAL BREEDING VALUES SECOND EDITION

TASK 6.3 Modelling and data analysis support

Single and multitrait estimates of breeding values for survival using sire and animal models

Biometrical Genetics. Lindon Eaves, VIPBG Richmond. Boulder CO, 2012

Estimation of Parameters in Random. Effect Models with Incidence Matrix. Uncertainty

Quantitative Genetics & Evolutionary Genetics

Prediction of Future Milk Yield with Random Regression Model Using Test-day Records in Holstein Cows

LECTURE # How does one test whether a population is in the HW equilibrium? (i) try the following example: Genotype Observed AA 50 Aa 0 aa 50

2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

DNA polymorphisms such as SNP and familial effects (additive genetic, common environment) to

STUDY GUIDE SECTION 16-1 Genetic Equilibrium

Impact of Using Reduced Rank Random Regression Test-Day Model on Genetic Evaluation

Lecture 10. Factorial experiments (2-way ANOVA etc)

KEY: Chapter 9 Genetics of Animal Breeding.

Genetic assessment of fighting ability in Valdostana cattle breeds

The Chromosomal Basis of Inheritance

Chapter 17: Population Genetics and Speciation

Methods for QTL analysis

Lecture 6. QTL Mapping

Genetic Parameters for Stillbirth in the Netherlands

Theory a well supported testable explanation of phenomenon occurring in the natural world.

1. The diagram below shows two processes (A and B) involved in sexual reproduction in plants and animals.

Prediction of breeding values with additive animal models for crosses from 2 populations

Evolution of phenotypic traits

Transcription:

Quantitative characters - exercises 1. a) Calculate the genetic covariance between half sibs, expressed in the ij notation (Cockerham's notation), when up to loci are considered. b) Calculate the genetic covariance between full sibs, expressed in the ij notation, when up to loci are considered. c) Show how the covariances between full-sibs and half-sibs, respectively can be combined to get an estimation of the particular part of variation in a trait that is caused by dominance effects ( = ) D 01. Two individuals X and Y are cousins and thus have the following pedigree: A B E C D F X Y a) What is the respective additive and dominance relationship between X and Y? b) What is the composition of the genetic covariance for this type of relatives? Note that: (X) 0 = (0) 0 = 1 (0) 1 = (0) = 0 1

3. A B C D E F G H X Y What is the genetic covariance (expressed in -units) between the individuals X and Y when loci are considered? 4. a) Calculate the composition of the genetic covariance between parent offspring. b) Put the results from 4.a), 1.a) and 1.b) together in the upper part of the following table: Covariance 10 b. 01 0 11 0 Parent offspring Half-sibs Full-sibs c. Parent offspring Half-sibs Full-sibs c) Multiply the respective covariances above by a figure each so that you get an estimate of the total additive genetic variance A. Fill in the results in the lower part of the table above. Compare the covariances regarding bias that appears as non-additive components in the estimation.

5. The following table gives the weight at 8 weeks for chicken. The chicken were progenies from five different, randomly selected cocks. Only half-sibs were found within each progeny group. Sires A B C D E Offspring 687 691 793 675 700 753 704 717 618 680 59 683 631 691 694 73 618 687 763 747 678 737 731 603 600 657 669 606 718 693 669 648 717 658 674 611 678 788 650 690 Y i 570 531 5564 560 5466 Σ i Σ j Y ij = 7331 Σ i Σ j Y ij = 18773473 N = 40 a) Set up a statistical model which describes the data set. b) Set up the ANOVA-table and calculate MS (mean squares) and E(MS) (expected mean squares). c) Solve for the statistical variance components and translate these into biological components, i.e. the additive genetic and phenotypic variances for the weight at 8 weeks. d) In what way will the estimation of the additive genetic variance be affected if the trait above is affected by - interaction between non-allelic genes - interaction between allelic genes e) Calculate the heritability for the weight at 8 weeks. 3

6. Within the cow recording system an investigation has been conducted where the daily milk yield has been recorded on 350 cows. These cows were the progeny of 40 sires, which had all an equal number of progenies. The relationship (= additive relationship) was calculated to 0.8. The sires were not selected. The following sums of squares were calculated in the analysis of variance: Source of variation d.f. SS MS E(MS) Between sires 5 000 Within sires 46 800 Total a) Calculate the statistical parameters that are needed and then estimate the additive genetic variance and the phenotypic variance for daily milk yield. b) Is the covariance between half-sibs the most appropriate method for estimation of the additive genetic variance in daily milk yield? Explain why! c) Calculate the heritability for daily milk yield. 4

7. The tenderness of meat from 88 Landrace pigs was estimated. The pigs were progenies of 138 boars which were mated to 3 sows each. Two full-sibs from each litter were slaughtered at 90 and 100 kg live weight respectively, and the shear force was measured. The structure of the data set was thus: Boar.. 1 138 Sow.. 1 3 41 413 414 o o o o o o.. o o o o o o Progeny 1 3 4 5 6 83 84 85 86 87 88 The effects of boar and sow can be considered as random and weight as fixed. The following sums of squares were calculated: Source of variation d.f. SS MS E(MS) Between boars Between sows within boars Between weights Residual 137 76 1 413 184.9 3.5 9.4 51.9 Total 87 669.7 a) Set up a complete statistical model for the analysis above. b) Calculate the mean squares (MS) and fill in the expected mean squares (EMS) in the table. c) Solve for the variance components. 5

d) Estimate the additive genetic variance, A, from the statistical variance component which, according to you, gives the best unbiased estimate. State the reasons for your choise. e) Estimate the phenotypic variance P. f) How high is the heritability (h ) for tenderness in this data set? g) The taste of the meat has also been estimated in the same material. The following variance and covariance components were calculated: Taste: = 0.40 ; = 0.50 ; s% d% = 1.0 e% Tenderness taste: % = 0.06 ; % = 0.09 ; % = 0.50 ss dd ee Calculate the genetic and the phenotypic correlation between the two traits tenderness and taste. 6

8. The daily weight gain and the height at withers have been recorded on 57 young bulls, which make equal groups of half-sibs from 31 sires. In the variance/covariance analysis the following mean squares and mean products have been calculated. Source of variation d.f. Mean square (MS) Weight gain Height at withers MCP Weight Height at gain x withers Between sires 30 0.0187 3097. 3.1978 Within sires 56 0.0110 158.5 1.1746 a) Calculate the statistical variance and covariance components. b) Estimate the additive genetic variance for the two traits respectively ( and A A % ) and the additive genetic covariance ( % ) between them. AA c) Estimate the environmental covariance ( EE % ) and the phenotypic covariance ( PP % ) between the two traits. d) What is the association between the three biological covariance components? e) Calculate the genetic correlation between daily weight gain and height at withers. What conclusions could be drawn from the result? f) Calculate the phenotypic correlation between the two traits. g) Calculate the environmental correlation. 7

9. a) Which biological variance- and covariance components contribute to the phenotypic covariance between half-sibs? Explain the meaning of the components. b) Which of these components are assumed to be zero or negligible when we estimate A? 10. Why do we estimate biological variance/covariance components in animal breeding, and what are the estimates used for? 11. When we estimate genetic variances most attention is often paid to the additive genetic variance ( ) A. Why? 1. What are the advantages of using data on half-sibs instead of parent offspring when we? estimate ( A ) 8