A stable treatment of conservative thermodynamic variables for semi-implicit semi-lagrangian dynamical cores

Similar documents
Overview of the Numerics of the ECMWF. Atmospheric Forecast Model

Semi-implicit methods, nonlinear balance, and regularized equations

A semi-implicit non-hydrostatic covariant dynamical kernel using spectral representation in the horizontal and a height based vertical coordinate

Francis X. Giraldo,

New variables in spherical geometry. David G. Dritschel. Mathematical Institute University of St Andrews.

The Shallow Water Equations

An inherently mass-conserving semi-implicit semi-lagrangian discretization of the deep-atmosphere global non-hydrostatic equations

Formulation and performance of the Variable-Cubic Atmospheric Model

Computational challenges in Numerical Weather Prediction

ECMWF Overview. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts is an international. organisation supported by 23 European States.

Time-Parallel Algorithms for Weather Prediction and Climate Simulation

Data Science in Academic Research & Physics of Wind Energy

CAM-SE: Lecture I. Peter Hjort Lauritzen

Time-Parallel Algorithms for Weather Prediction and Climate Simulation

NCAR Global Atmospheric Core Workshop, Boulder, June 2008

Modelling the atmosphere. Hennie Kelder University of Technology Eindhoven

MOX EXPONENTIAL INTEGRATORS FOR MULTIPLE TIME SCALE PROBLEMS OF ENVIRONMENTAL FLUID DYNAMICS. Innsbruck Workshop October

Chapter 3. Finite Difference Methods for Hyperbolic Equations Introduction Linear convection 1-D wave equation

Adaptive Mesh Methods for Numerical Weather Prediction

Reynolds Averaging. We separate the dynamical fields into slowly varying mean fields and rapidly varying turbulent components.

Chapter 5. Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling

The spectral transform method

Fluid Animation. Christopher Batty November 17, 2011

Tangent-linear and adjoint models in data assimilation

Improving ECMWF s IFS model by Nils Wedi

8 Mechanisms for tropical rainfall responses to equatorial

SWiM A Semi-Lagrangian, Semi-Implicit Shallow Water

Meteorology 6150 Cloud System Modeling

An Overview of Fluid Animation. Christopher Batty March 11, 2014

ICON. The Icosahedral Nonhydrostatic modelling framework

Physics/Dynamics coupling

Univ. of Maryland-College Park, Dept. of Atmos. & Oceanic Science. NOAA/NCEP/Environmental Modeling Center

Nonlinear baroclinic dynamics of surface cyclones crossing a zonal jet

Dynamics of the Zonal-Mean, Time-Mean Tropical Circulation

Earth System Modeling Domain decomposition

POD Model Reduction of Large Scale Geophysical Models. Ionel M. Navon

HEIGHT-LATITUDE STRUCTURE OF PLANETARY WAVES IN THE STRATOSPHERE AND TROPOSPHERE. V. Guryanov, A. Fahrutdinova, S. Yurtaeva

The development and testing of a new two-time-level semi-lagrangian scheme (SETTLS) in the ECMWF forecast model

IMPACTS OF SIGMA COORDINATES ON THE EULER AND NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS USING CONTINUOUS/DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHODS

Chapter 4. Nonlinear Hyperbolic Problems

Linear model for investigation of nonlinear NWP model accuracy. Marko Zirk, University of Tartu

Recent developments of the global semi-lagrangian atmospheric model

Mass-conserving and positive-definite semi-lagrangian advection in NCEP GFS: Decomposition for massively parallel computing without halo

Impact of Resolution on Extended-Range Multi-Scale Simulations

The General Circulation of the Atmosphere: A Numerical Experiment

A Modified Dynamic Framework for the Atmospheric Spectral Model and Its Application

Coupled Global-Regional Data Assimilation Using Joint States

Split explicit methods

Vertical Coordinates and Upper Boundary Conditions. When selecting a vertical coordinate, there are three primary considerations to keep in mind:

Comparing the formulations of CCAM and VCAM and aspects of their performance

Exploring Gravity Wave Dynamics, Sources, and Predictability in DeepWave

11A.3 The Impact on Tropical Cyclone Predictions of a Major Upgrade to the Met Office Global Model

The WRF NMM Core. Zavisa Janjic Talk modified and presented by Matthew Pyle

Fall Colloquium on the Physics of Weather and Climate: Regional Weather Predictability and Modelling. 29 September - 10 October, 2008

Data Assimilation Development for the FV3GFSv2

A primal-dual mixed finite element method. for accurate and efficient atmospheric. modelling on massively parallel computers

Semi-Lagrangian Formulations for Linear Advection Equations and Applications to Kinetic Equations

Daniel J. Jacob, Models of Atmospheric Transport and Chemistry, 2007.

How does 4D-Var handle Nonlinearity and non-gaussianity?

A Strategy for the Development of Coupled Ocean- Atmosphere Discontinuous Galerkin Models

ρ x + fv f 'w + F x ρ y fu + F y Fundamental Equation in z coordinate p = ρrt or pα = RT Du uv tanφ Dv Dt + u2 tanφ + vw a a = 1 p Dw Dt u2 + v 2

Exact Solution of the Linear, 4D-Discrete, Implicit, Semi-Lagrangian Dynamic Equations with Orographic Forcing

Radiative contribution to the North-American cold air outbreaks in a Lagrangian perspective

Evaluation of three spatial discretization schemes with the Galewsky et al. test

AOS 452 Lab 13 Handout Upper-Level Frontogenesis and Sawyer-Eliassen Circulations

Introduction of a Stabilized Bi-Conjugate Gradient iterative solver for Helmholtz s Equation on the CMA GRAPES Global and Regional models.

Latest thoughts on stochastic kinetic energy backscatter - good and bad

On the prognostic treatment of stratospheric ozone in the Environment Canada global NWP system

Lecture #2 Planetary Wave Models. Charles McLandress (Banff Summer School 7-13 May 2005)

Hydrodynamic conservation laws and turbulent friction in atmospheric circulation models

Scalable Non-Linear Compact Schemes

A Proposed Test Suite for Atmospheric Model Dynamical Cores

Background Error Covariance Modelling

Weather Forecasting Models in Met Éireann. Eoin Whelan UCD Seminar 3 rd April 2012

A Nodal High-Order Discontinuous Galerkin Dynamical Core for Climate Simulations

Four ways of inferring the MMC. 1. direct measurement of [v] 2. vorticity balance. 3. total energy balance

The ECMWF Hybrid 4D-Var and Ensemble of Data Assimilations

Circulation and Vorticity

A High Order Conservative Semi-Lagrangian Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Two-Dimensional Transport Simulations

AA214B: NUMERICAL METHODS FOR COMPRESSIBLE FLOWS

SPECIAL PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT

Hamiltonian particle-mesh simulations for a non-hydrostatic vertical slice model

Toward the Mitigation of Spurious Cloud-Edge Supersaturation in Cloud Models

Numerical explorations of a forward-backward diffusion equation

The Advanced Research WRF (ARW) Dynamics Solver

A Study on Numerical Solution to the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equation

Quasi-geostrophic system

3.4. Monotonicity of Advection Schemes

+ ω = 0, (1) (b) In geometric height coordinates in the rotating frame of the Earth, momentum balance for an inviscid fluid is given by

Experience with DNS of particulate flow using a variant of the immersed boundary method

The Canadian approach to ensemble prediction

Dynamical kernel of the Aladin NH spectral limited-area model: Revised formulation and sensitivity experiments

MODEL TYPE (Adapted from COMET online NWP modules) 1. Introduction

ICON. The Icosahedral Nonhydrostatic model: Formulation of the dynamical core and physics-dynamics coupling

The CMC 15km Global Deterministic Prediction System with the Yin-Yang grid.

Dynamic Meteorology (Atmospheric Dynamics)

Boundary layer controls on extratropical cyclone development

Vorticity in natural coordinates

Partial Differential Equations

Analysis Methods in Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

Transcription:

A stable treatment of conservative thermodynamic variables for semi-implicit semi-lagrangian dynamical cores Kevin Viner Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA September 26, 2012 Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 1 / 21

Introduction Navy Global Environmental Model (NAVGEM) 3TL SL-SI hydrostatic spectral transform horizontal, finite-difference vertical with Lorenz staggering hybrid pressure coordinates {u, v, θ v, p s } prognostic variables Currently T359L50 with t = 360s Requires heavy implicit biasing (α = 0.8) for stability...why? Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 2 / 21

SI scheme in NAVGEM Introduction Robert [3] semi-implicit scheme with {p s, T } ref = {800hPa, 300K } du dt dv = fu cos2 (Φ) dt a 2 dθ v = tt {τd} dt dp 1 s = [D p dt η + η = fv 1 φ a 2 λ c pθ v π a 2 λ tt a 2 {γ θ v φ µ c pθ v cos 2 (Φ) 0 tt () = [α() + () 0 + (1 α)() ] a 2 λ + δ p s λ } ( η p η )]dη tt{νd} π µ tt a 2 {γ θ v µ + δ p s µ } where {γ, δ, τ, ν} are prebuilt reference matrices. Performing a spectral transform allows reduction to a single Helmholtz equation in terms of D which can be solved through an eigenvalue decomposition of the mass matrix Γ = (γτ + δν). Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 3 / 21

Introduction Stability Conditions for SL advection SL removes the limiting CFL condition t < α x u associated with Eulerian advection The new stability condition is t < α x u, known as the Lipschitz or deformation CFL condition Shown with traditional linear backward trajectories from a regular grid... x D x D Crossing trajectories represent a non-unique solution...not allowed! i-1 i i+1 i+2 x xa A Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 4 / 21

semi-implicit scheme Introduction Fast mode terms are treated implicitly in Eulerian models to relax the CFL condition In SL models this has the effect relaxing the deformation CFL condition Generally, for a 3TL scheme (extension to 2TL is straightforward) for some prognostic variable ψ: EUL ψ t SL dψ dt = S 0 + F 0 + tt F L = F 0 M + ttf L What happens if F and S are not separable? Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 5 / 21

Problem SI-SL using potential temperature (or other conservative thermodynamic variable) Consider the "energy conversion term" in the thermodynamic equation for temperature (e.g., ECMWF s IFS) and potential temperature (e.g., NAVGEM, UKMO s UM) or similarly for enthalpy (e.g., NCEP s GFS-SL, Juang 2011 [1]) in a model utilizing a hybrid pressure coordinate η: F N = κωt p F N = η θ η = S vert The time discretization for the potential temperature case is then: dθ dt = tt F L. However, it has been noted by "The Joy of U.M. 6.3" (Staniforth et. al. 2006 [4]) that the lack of a semi-implicitly treated energy conversion term on the RHS results in an unstable scheme. Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 6 / 21

Solutions Potential Remedies Circumvent the problem with reduced accuracy smoothing: Decentering (α > 0.5) increased diffusion increased time filter Return the missing nonlinear term to RHS: Vertically non-interpolating scheme for θ (see UKMO UM New Dynamics documentation) SL advection of perturbation θ (see UKMO UM ENDGame documentation, Wood et. al 2010 [2]) Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 7 / 21

Solutions Vertically non-interpolating scheme for θ Project the departure point onto the nearest vertical level, treat the remainder in an Eulerian semi-implicit fashion on RHS. x A k ' x D k+1 x Stable in linear stability analysis. However, unstable in practice. UKMO forced to result to heavy decentering to maintain stability (α 1) D Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 8 / 21

Solutions SL advection of perturbation θ as done in ENDGame The predictor-corrector and iterative Helmholtz solver applied in the UM are quite useful for this particular problem: Use solution from previous time step as basic state to keep θ vd small Eulerian advection of basic state is treated semi-implicitly by the predictor-corrector (No CFL worries) Iterative Helmholtz solver can be used to reduce the dependence of the discretization on the choice of basic state d(θ vd θvd 0) + v θ 0 dt vd = 0 Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 9 / 21

Solutions SL advection of perturbation θ as done is NAVGEM Since our SI scheme forces us to use θ v throughout our coupled equation set, in addition to gaining stability we have the opportunity to: reduce error in vertical integration of geopotential gradient terms treat variation in θ v due to terrain in an Eulerian fashion to eliminate terrain resonance Borrow idea from Wu et al 2008 [5] and most limited area models to define and extract hydrostatically balanced basic state a single vertical profile is used which represents a nonlinear regression to the U.S. standard atmosphere θ 0 = θ 0 (p) Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 10 / 21

Solutions NAVGEM implementation, continued du dt dv dt = fv 1 a 2 φ λ c pθv a 2 π λ = fu cos2 (Φ) φ a 2 µ c pθ v cos 2 (Φ) π µ a 2 dθ v dt = ω dθ 0 dp 1 dp s = [D p dt 0 η + p ( η η η )]dη dq = 0 dt φ π = c pθ v η p η = p t 1 [D p η + η ( U p cos 2 (Φ) λ + V p µ )]dη 0 Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 11 / 21

Experimental Setup Experimental setup Perform a few experiments for with and without modifications described: Single one month cold start Varied time step Cycled DA tests for 7 weeks (snapshots) SL details and physics may vary across experiments, but only difference in settings between compared results are modification discussed herein. Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 12 / 21

Results Stratospheric Warming: monthly mean zonal winds Control Perturbation Analysis c.f., GMAO MERRA Analysis for January 2011 Thanks to Y.-J. Kim Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 13 / 21

Results Stability: T239L60 Control Case with α = 0.80 Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 14 / 21

Results Stability: T239L60 Perturbation θ with α = 0.60 Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 15 / 21

Results 2012070400+120hrs pressure vertical velocity at 0.2mb: Control case (with limiters) Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 16 / 21

Results 2012070400+120hrs pressure vertical velocity at 0.2mb: Perturbation case (α = 0.55, no limiters) Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 17 / 21

Results Advantages/Limitations Advantages: Semi-implicit scheme is stable and effective Allows larger time steps without issue Reduced decentering retains high frequency motions that drive stratospheric/mesospheric circulations Better agreement with satellite observations at upper levels Limitations: choice of basic state is subjective and allows large variations in θ v Use without predictor-corrector leaves behind explicit nonlinear vertical advection term requiring weak decentering to avoid CFL violations over steep terrain Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 18 / 21

Results Influence of Basic State?...structure of θ Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 19 / 21

Results Influence of Basic State?...(θ pert θ ctrl ) 2012070400 Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 20 / 21

Summary Conclusions Application of a standard SISL scheme to a conservative thermodynamic variable leads to an unstable centered scheme The only way to realize stability using a centered scheme is to extract the vertical advection of said variable from the SL trajectory and treat it in an Eulerian manner Results show significant improvements above 10mb where decentering was most detrimental Future work will look to create more uniform θ v and attempt a more implicit treatment once we move to a two-time-level scheme Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 21 / 21

Summary A. White J. Thuburn T. Allen T. Davies M. Diamantakis M. Dubal M. Gross T. Melvin C. Smith M. Zerroukat N. Wood, A. Staniforth. Endgame formulation v3.01. Technical report, U.K.M.O. A. Robert. The integration of a spectral model of the atmosphere by the implicit method, journal =. A. Staniforth, A. White, N. Wood, J. Thuburn, M. Zerroukat, E. Cordero, and T. Davies. The joy of u.m. 6.3- model formulation, unified model documentation paper no. 15. Technical report, U.K.M.O. Tongwen Wu, Rucong Yu, and Fang Zhang. A modified framework for the atmospheric spectral model and its application. Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 21 / 21

Summary J. Atmos. Sci., 65:2235 2253, 2008. Kevin Viner (NRL) PDE s on the sphere 2012 21 / 21