Method of Perturbative-PIC Simulation for CSR Effect

Similar documents
Synchrotron radiation reaction force (Lecture 24)

DESY/TEMF Meeting - Status 2011

1. (16) A point charge e moves with velocity v(t) on a trajectory r(t), where t is the time in some lab frame.

Andreas Kabel Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

CERN Accelerator School. Intermediate Accelerator Physics Course Chios, Greece, September Low Emittance Rings

Low Emittance Machines

Beam instabilities (I)

Modeling of Space Charge Effects and Coherent Synchrotron Radiation in Bunch Compression Systems. Martin Dohlus DESY, Hamburg

Beam-Beam Simulations for e + e Colliders

Low Emittance Machines

III. CesrTA Configuration and Optics for Ultra-Low Emittance David Rice Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education

Particle Accelerators: Transverse Beam Dynamics

CSR calculation by paraxial approximation

Instabilities Part III: Transverse wake fields impact on beam dynamics

Beam Dynamics in Synchrotrons with Space- Charge

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

Physics 598ACC Accelerators: Theory and Applications

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Self-consistent analysis of three dimensional uniformly charged ellipsoid with zero emittance

Equations of motion in an accelerator (Lecture 7)

Synchrotron Motion with Space-Charge

Retarded Potentials and Radiation

Index. Accelerator model 8 Adiabatic damping 32, 141 Air-bag model 338 Alternating explicit time scheme 112 Azimuthal modes, see Modes

Synchrotron Radiation Reflection from Outer Wall of Vacuum Chamber

Accelerator Physics Issues of ERL Prototype

Optics considerations for

Analysis of Slice Transverse Emittance Evolution in a Photocathode RF Gun. Abstract

!"#$%$!&'()$"('*+,-')'+-$#..+/+,0)&,$%.1&&/$ LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS

EFFECTS OF THE WIGGLER ON THE HEFEI LIGHT SOURCE STORAGE RING

S1: Particle Equations of Motion S1A: Introduction: The Lorentz Force Equation

The kinetic equation (Lecture 11)

Transverse Dynamics II

Fast Simulation of FEL Linacs with Collective Effects. M. Dohlus FLS 2018

BEAM INSTABILITIES IN LINEAR MACHINES 1.

EFFICIENT 3D POISSON SOLVERS FOR SPACE-CHARGE SIMULATION

Letter of Intent for KEK Super B Factory

Lecture 21 April 15, 2010

Head-tail instability caused by electron cloud in positron storage rings

r,t r R Z j ³ 0 1 4π² 0 r,t) = 4π

Part II Effect of Insertion Devices on the Electron Beam

Linear and Nonlinear Oscillators (Lecture 2)

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 18 Jun 2008

Electron cloud studies for the CLIC damping rings

Coherent synchrotron radiation in magnetic bunch compressors. Qiang Gao, ZhaoHeng Guo, Alysson Vrielink

Speeding up simulations of relativistic systems using an optimal boosted frame

Computer Algorithm for Longitudinal Single Bunch Stability Study in a Storage Ring * Abstract

Beam-Beam Simulation for PEP-II

Fast proton bunch generation in the interaction of ultraintense laser pulses with high-density plasmas

Electron Linear Accelerators & Free-Electron Lasers

RESONANCE BASIS MAPS AND npb TRACKING FOR DYNAMIC APERTURE STUDIES *

NOVEL METHOD FOR MULTI-TURN EXTRACTION: TRAPPING CHARGED PARTICLES IN ISLANDS OF PHASE SPACE

Lecture notes on Classical Mechanics and Electromagnetism in Accelerator Physics

The Detector Design of the Jefferson Lab EIC

Accelerator Physics NMI and Synchrotron Radiation. G. A. Krafft Old Dominion University Jefferson Lab Lecture 16

Overview of CSR codes

CSR Effects in Beam Dynamics

Xiaobiao Huang Accelerator Physics August 28, The Dipole Passmethod for Accelerator Toolbox

Progress Report: New Particle-In-Cell Code For Numerical Simulations of Coherent Synchrotron Radiation

Introduction to electron and photon beam physics. Zhirong Huang SLAC and Stanford University

Accelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.

Modeling CESR-c. D. Rubin. July 22, 2005 Modeling 1

X-ray non-resonant and resonant magnetic scattering Laurent C. Chapon, Diamond Light Source. European School on Magnetism L. C.

Suppression of Radiation Excitation in Focusing Environment * Abstract

Electron-Cloud Theory & Simulations

(x1+x2)/2 (m) time (s)

Accelerator Physics Homework #3 P470 (Problems: 1-5)

Space Charge Mi-ga-on

Lecture 2: Modeling Accelerators Calculation of lattice functions and parameters. X. Huang USPAS, January 2015 Hampton, Virginia

INVESTIGATIONS OF THE DISTRIBUTION IN VERY SHORT ELECTRON BUNCHES LONGITUDINAL CHARGE

Transverse beam stability and Landau damping in hadron colliders

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

On-axis injection into small dynamic aperture

Three Loose Ends: Edge Focusing; Chromaticity; Beam Rigidity.

Beam Physics at SLAC. Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department Head. July 8, 2008 SLAC Annual Program Review Page 1

R&D for the International Linear Collider Damping Rings

3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics

modeling of space charge effects and CSR in bunch compression systems

ThomX Machine Advisory Committee. (LAL Orsay, March ) Ring Beam Dynamics

NUMERICAL MODELING OF FAST BEAM ION INSTABILITIES

Outline. 1 Why PIC Simulations Make Sense. 2 The Algorithm. 3 Examples Surface High Harmonics Generation. 4 Extensions Of The PIC Algorithm

S2E: Solenoidal Focusing

S2E: Solenoidal Focusing

AN ULTRA-HIGH RESOLUTION PULSED-WIRE MAGNET MEASUREMENT SYSTEM. Alex D Audney Thesis Defense Colorado State University

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

Numerical Methods II

Magnetic Multipoles, Magnet Design

A NEW PARADIGM FOR MODELING, SIMULATIONS AND ANALYSIS OF INTENSE BEAMS

LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS OF PARTICLES IN ACCELERATORS. Author: Urša Rojec Mentor: Simon Širca. Ljubljana, November 2012

Introduction to Accelerator Physics Old Dominion University. Nonlinear Dynamics Examples in Accelerator Physics

S. Guiducci. Table 1 PADME beam from Linac. Energy (MeV) 550. Number of positrons per pulse Pulse length (ns)

04.sup Equations of Motion and Applied Fields *

RF LINACS. Alessandra Lombardi BE/ ABP CERN

S5: Linear Transverse Particle Equations of Motion without Space Charge, Acceleration, and Momentum Spread S5A: Hill's Equation

S5: Linear Transverse Particle Equations of Motion without Space Charge, Acceleration, and Momentum Spread S5A: Hill's Equation

Impedance & Instabilities

Tracking code for microwave instability

Beam Dynamics. Gennady Stupakov. DOE High Energy Physics Review June 2-4, 2004

(a) Sections 3.7 through (b) Sections 8.1 through 8.3. and Sections 8.5 through 8.6. Problem Set 4 due Monday, 10/14/02

Transcription:

Method of Perturbative-PIC Simulation for CSR Effect Jack J. Shi Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Kansas OUTLINE Why Do We Want to Do This? Perturbation Expansion of the Retardation of CSR PIC Method for the Evaluation of the Retarded Field Supported by U.S. DOE

The Problem How to evaluate numerically the interaction between a short bunch and its synchrotron radiation? An ultrashort bunch moving along a circular orbit. The interaction is collective in nature particle distribution is involved. bunch The interaction involved a retarded bunch particle distribution.

Radiation Field of a Moving Charge in Free Space The field radiated from a moving charge at ( X 1, t 1 ) and observed at ( X, t) in the lab frame is e( n β 1 ) E( X, t, X 1, t 1 ) = + e n [( n β 1 ) β 1 ] γ1 2 r2 (1 n β 1 ) 3 c ret r (1 n β 1 ) 3 ret B( X, t, X 1, t 1 ) = n E where r = X X 1, n = r/r, β 1 = v 1 (t 1 )/c, and the retardation condition is r = c(t t 1 ) = cτ. For an electron in an ultra-relativistic beam, v 1 and v 1 are dominated by the bunch centroid motion and, therefore, can be well approximated by the velocity and acceleration of the bunch centroid at t 1.

Lorenz Force due to Synchrotron Radiation Let X(t) = X c (t) + x(t) be a global coordinate of a bunch particle in the lab frame, where X c (t) is the global coordinate of the bunch centroid and x is the coordinate of the particle respect to its bunch centroid. The Lorenz force on a particle at X due to the radiation from its bunch is F SR ( X, t) = G( X X 1, t, τ) f( X 1, P 1, t τ) d X 1 d P 1 [ ] G( X X 1, t, τ) = e E( X, t, X 1, t 1 ) + β B( X, t, X 1, t 1 ) where τ = X X 1 /c is the retardation of the radiation field and f( X 1, P 1, t τ) is the retarded bunch particle distribution.

Traditional PIC Method Cannot Be Easily Used: Chief of difficulties in a self-consistant simulation of the CSR problem is how to construct the retarded particle distribution f( X 1, P 1, t τ) numerically. It is very difficult, if not impossible, to use the traditional PIC method for this problem. Current CSR Codes: The most codes developed for the CSR problem so far have thus adapted the approaches of (a) non-self-consistent; (b) tracking of a limited number of macroparticles and the particle-radiation interaction being calculated with particle-to-particle individually; or (c) solving the Vlasov-Maxwell equation in phase space.

Our Approach: The retardation of f( X 1, P 1, t τ) is treated perturbatively. The expansion of the retarded distribution can be reconstructed effectively with the PIC method during the simulation. This perturbative-pic calculation of the retarded distribution can be applied to the calculation of either the radiation field or the Liénard-Wiechert potential of the radiation field.

m ax 1 m ax 0 Expansion of the Retardation of f( X 1, P 1, t τ) Maximal Retardation of CSR The maximal retardation of the radiation-particle interaction is between particles in the tail and particles in the head of a bunch. Including those particles in the tail of the distribution ( 4σ z ), ( 24σz θmax 2 R ) 1/3 For an example, if R 10 m, γ 1000, σ z 1 mm, θmax < 0.3 < 16 retardation << time scale of slow emittance growth!

Expansion of the Retardation of f( X 1, P 1, t τ) Fact: The time dependence of a bunch particle distribution has two significantly different time scales: A fast time scale is of the linear dynamics of a bunch as its centroid moves along the lattice and its beam sizes vary with lattice functions. A slow time scale is of the slow beam-size growth due to nonlinear perturbations. Retardation on the Fast Time Scale: Since the linear dynamics is known, the retardation on the fast time scale can be eliminated in the distribution analytically by using the normalized variables. Retardation on the Slow Time Scale: Since the retardation in the distribution is usually much shorter than the slow time scale, the retardation on the slow time scale can be approximated by an expansion in terms of the retardation.

Elimination of Fast Time Dependence of f( X, P, t) The fast time dependence of f( X, P, t τ) can be eliminated by using the normalized variables ( q, p). For an ultra-relativistic beam, the transformation of ( X, P) to ( q, p ) is symplectic. The force integral of the radiation simply becomes F SR ( q, t) = G 1 ( q, q, τ) ρ( q, t τ) d q ρ( q, t) = f( q, p, t) d p x = ( β 1/2 x (θ)q 1, β 1/2 y (θ)q 2, q 3 ), θ = v 0 t/r x 1 = ( β 1/2 x (θ δθ)q 1, β1/2 y (θ δθ)q 2, q 3 ), δθ = v 0τ/R X = X c (t) + x, X 1 = X c (t τ) + x 1 Both τ and G 1 are only functions of ( q, q ), not ( p, p ).

Retardation in ρ( q, t τ) Without any nonlinear perturbation and if a bunch matches with linear ring, f( q, p, t) is a constant of motion and ρ( q, t) does not depend on t explicitly. With the perturbation of CSR, ρ( q, t) depends on t weakly. If the emittance growth due to CSR is insignificant in the time scale of the retardation, i.e. τmax ρ( q, t) ρ( q, t) t τ max σ dσ dt << 1 the retardation of the weakly t-dependence of ρ( q, t τ) can be treated perturbatively. For a bunch that is slightly mismatched with linear ring, as long as the oscillation of the bunch is not significant in the time scale of the retardation, the perturbative treatment of the retardation in ρ( q, t τ) should still be valid.

Expansion of Weak τ-dependence of ρ( q, t τ) ρ( q, s τ s ) = n=0 1 n! n ρ( q, s) ( τ s n s ) n where s = v 0 t and τ s = v 0 τ. Note that this expansion preserves the normalization condition of the distribution. The force integral of SCR is then F SR ( q, s) = n=0 F n ( q, s) F n ( q, s) = G 1 ( q, q, τ s ) ( τ s) n n! n ρ( q, s) s n d q If the time step in the simulation is small enough, ( F SR ( q, s) F 0 ( q, s) + F 1 ( q, s) + O τ max 2 2 ) ρ( q, s) s 2 where F 0 can be evaluated with the standard PIC method.

How To Evaluate F 1, which needs ρ/ s? ρ/ s can be obtained directly with numerical differentiation during the simulation but it could be numerically unstable! Since G 1 ( q, q, τ s ) does not depend on the momenta, ρ/ s can be obtained without the numerical differentiation with s. To manipulate ρ/ s, we start with the Liouville s equation, f s = d p ds f p d q ds f q and the equation of motion with the kick approximation for CSR, d q H 0 = ds p d p = H 0 ds q + s k F SR ( q, s) δ(s s k ) k where H 0 is the Hamiltonian without SCR, s k is the location of the kick, and s k is the duration between two successive kicks.

Substituting the equation of motion into the Liouville s equation yields ρ s = k = q H 0 q f p d p s k δ(s s k ) H0 p For an ultra-relativistic beam, H0 p i H0 p 3 p p = = 1 β i (s) [ 1 + β1/2 x (s) q 1 R where β 1 = β x and β 2 = β y. p H 0 p f q d p F SR ( q, s) f p d p p i f( q, p, s)d p = 1 β i (s) p i p, i = 1 or 2 ] ρ( q, s)

Final Formulas for Computing the Retarded Field F 0 ( q, s) = G 1 ( q, q, τ s ) ρ( q, s) d q F 1 ( q, s) = 2 G i ( q, q, s) p i p d q i=1 G 3 ( q, q, s) ρ( q, s) d q G i ( q, q, s) = G 3 ( q, q, s) = 1 β i (s) [ (τ s G 1 ) q i 1 + β1/2 x (s) q 1 R, i = 1, 2 ] (τs G 1 ) q 3 p p as a function of q and ρ( q, s) can be constructed on a mesh in PIC simulation by using a similarly computational procedure.

Retardation δθ = τ s /R as a Function of ( q, q ) [ ] 2 [ ] 2 δθ 2 = 1 + β 1/2 x (θ) q 1 + 1 + β 1/2 x (θ δθ) q 1 [ ] 2 + β 1/2 y (θ) q 2 β 1/2 y (θ δθ) q 2 + q 2 3 + q 2 3 {[ ] [ ] } 2 1 + β 1/2 x (θ) q 1 1 + β 1/2 x (θ δθ) q 1 + q 3 q 3 cos δθ [ ] [ ]} +2 { q 3 1 + β 1/2 x (θ δθ) q 1 q 3 1 + β 1/2 x (θ) q 1 sin δθ where q = q/r. For a given mesh, δθ can be solved numerically at all the grid points prior to particle tracking. If the change of β x is small in the time scale of δθ, one may use the approximation β x (θ δθ) β x (θ) + 2Rα x (θ)δθ If R >> max( x, x 1 ), δθ 2 [ 3( q 3 q 3 )] 1/3 If R 10 m, σ z 1 mm, σ x 0.1 mm, the error in this approximation is less than 1%.

Green s Function in ( q, q )-Coordinate G 1 ( q, q, τ) = e2 r b 3 3 [ b 1 n + b 2 ( n β 1) β 1 + b 3 ( n β 1) 1 c β 1 ] where r = [(R + x) (R + x 1 ) cos δθ z 1 sin δθ] e x + (y y ) e y + [(R + x 1 ) sin δθ + z z 1 cos δθ] e z β 1 = e x sin δθ + e z cos δθ 1 c β 1 = 1 R ( e x cos δθ + e z sin δθ) b 1 = b 2 (1 cos δθ) b 3 R b 2 = 1 ( ) 1 γ + r β 2 1 n c sin δθ b 3 = r(1 n β 1 )

PIC Method for Evaluating Quadratures of F 0 and F 1 (Construct ρ( q, s) and p p on grids with Cloud-in-Cell ) Weight of q in horizontal, w 3 w 4 at the left = x 2 a, at the right = x 1 a Weight of q in vertical, at the bottom = y 2 b, at the top = y 1 = Weight of q at four corners: y 2 y 1 x 1 x 2 b w 1 w 2 w 1 = x 2 a y 2 b, w 2 = x 1 a y 2 b, w 3 = x 2 a y 1 b, w 4 = x 1 a y 1 b Contribution to ρ( q, s): ρ(j) ρ(j) + w j, j = 1,..., 4 Contribution to p p : p p (j) p p (j) + pw j

SUMMARY A 1st-order perturbation expansion of the retarded bunch particle distribution is developed for a study of the CSR effect numerically without a need of memorizing the history of the distribution. The use of the PIC method provides a smooth particle distribution constructed on a mesh in configuration space so that the expansion of the retarded distribution can be calculated on the mesh with a desired accuracy. The current approach of the perturbative-pic method neglects the effect of beam pipe on the radiation field and, therefore, can only be applied to the unshielded CSR problem. Methods of including the shielding effect need to be explored.