Analysis of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol Utilizing the Stratum PTC and Aquatek 70

Similar documents
Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

A Comparative Analysis of Fuel Oxygenates in Soil by Dynamic and Static Headspace Utilizing the HT3 TM Automatic Headspace Analyzer

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water and Soil by EPA Method 8260 with the Atomx Concentrator/Multimatrix Autosampler

UCMR 3 Low-Level VOC Analysis by Purge and Trap Concentration and GC/MS using Selective Ion Monitoring

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler

A Comparison of Volatile Organic Compound Response When Using Nitrogen as a Purge Gas

Amy Nutter, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1

Validation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System

US EPA Method with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

Evaluation of a New Analytical Trap for Gasoline Range Organics Analysis

Analytical Trap Comparison for USEPA Method 8260C

Volatile Organic Compounds in Every Day Food

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Samples by EPA Method 8260 with The Stratum PTC and SOLATek 72 Multi-Matrix Autosampler

Validation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C

Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions

Optimizing. Abstract: is standardd. procedures. altered to

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Using USEPA Method 8260 Application Note

US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

ANNE JUREK. Abstract: soils and are found. in can also with GC/MS. poster. in series. option for. There are problems. analytes. in methanol.

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1

Analysis. Introduction: necessary. presented. Discussion: As part of be carried. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Using Hydrogen as An Alternative Carrier Gas for US EPA 8260

System and JUREK ANNE. Introduction: in an in purge and. trap sampling. Discussion: As part of. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time

Low-Level Sulfur Compounds in Beer by Purge and Trap with a Pulsed Flame Photometric Detector (PFPD)

Sensitive Detection of 2-MIB and Geosmin in Drinking Water

Optimization of Method Parameters for the Evaluation of USEPA Method Using a Purge and Trap with GC/MS

The Determination of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals Using the Agilent G1888 Network Headspace Sampler Application

Optimizing Standard Preparation

Static Headspace Blood Alcohol Analysis with the G1888 Network Headspace Sampler Application

THE NEW QUANTITATIVE ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR ULTRATRACE SULFUR COMPOUNDS IN NATURAL GAS

Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s

Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the Clarus SQ 8

Improved Volatiles Analysis Using Static Headspace, the Agilent 5977B GC/MSD, and a High-efficiency Source

Validation of Environmental Water Methods on One System: Considerations for Sample Volume, Purge Parameters and Quality Control Parameters

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler

Headspace Technology for GC and GC/MS: Features, benefits & applications

Optimizing of Volatile Organic Compound Determination by Static Headspace Sampling

Fast USEPA 8270 Semivolatiles Analysis Using the 6890/5973 inert GC/MSD with Performance Electronics Application

Techniques for Optimizing the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Using Purge-and-Trap/GC/MS Application

Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air

Application Note. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry/Food Safety. Abstract. Authors

Study of Residual Solvents in Various Matrices by Static Headspace

British American Tobacco Group Research & Development. Method - Determination of phenols in mainstream cigarette smoke

USP <467> Headspace Residual Solvent Assay with a HT3 Headspace Instrument

-xt. -xt SYSTEM. Specifications for PAL-xt Systems. Valid for PAL-xt System models only. Prep and Load Platform

INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT. Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist, EST Analytical

Determination of Total Volatile Organic Compounds in Indoor Air Using Agilent 7667A mini TD and 7820A GC

Method of determination of phtalates in spirituous beverages by gaschromatography/mass

VOC Analysis of Water-Based Coatings by Headspace-Gas Chromatography

Automated Sample Preparation of Headspace Standards Using the Agilent 7696 WorkBench

Application Note 032

Determination of Off-Odor Compounds in Drinking Water Using an SPME Device with Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

Determination of Volatile Aromatic Compounds in Soil by Manual SPME and Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD

ICBA Guidance Document to Mitigate the Potential for Benzene Formation in Beverages Adopted by the ICBA Council on 29 April 2006

USP<467> residual solvents

Analyzing Semi-Volatiles by GC-MS

Blood Alcohol Determination using Static Headspace Analysis with Optimized Sample Throughput

Analysis of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals (USP<467>) with Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus and HS-10 Headspace Sampler

Analysis of USP Method <467> Residual Solvents on the Agilent 8890 GC System

TOTALLY INNOVATIVE MULTIMODE AUTOSAMPLER NEW KONIK ROBOKROM Laboratory Gas Generators An Overview +8 OPERATIONAL MODES MAIN FEATURES

U.S. EPA Method 8270 for multicomponent analyte determination

DIQUAT DIBROMIDE. The Determination of Ethylene Dibromide in Diquat Dibromide and Diquat Dibromide / Paraquat Dichloride SL Formulations

Analysis of Ethanol and Isotopomers by 240 Quadrupole Ion Trap GC/MS

The Focus Robotic Sample Processor as a Tool for the Multiple Analysis of Samples using Complementary Techniques

A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260

GC/MS Application Note

Optimal VOC Method Parameters for the StratUm PTC Purge & Trap Concentrator

Author. Abstract. Introduction

Sulfotepp impurities in Chlorpyrifos EC formulations

Detection of Chemical Warfare Agents by Transportable GC/MS

Analysis of Trace (mg/kg) Thiophene in Benzene Using Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography and Flame Ionization Detection Application

Applying the Technology of the TurboMatrix 650 ATD to the Analysis of Liquid Accelerants in Arson Investigation

Analysis of Low Level Volatile Organic Compounds in Air Anne Jurek

Date 02/24/96 Page 1 Revison 4.0 OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY METHODS 8020/8015 (MODIFIED) GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS (GRO)

Method - Determination of aromatic amines in mainstream cigarette smoke

A Direct 5 ms Column Performance Comparison for Active Semi-Volatile Analytes

Limit-test of NDMA and NDEA in Sartans. by GC-MS (Liquid-direct-injection)

Dynamic headspace (DHS) technique: set-up and parameter control for GC/MS analysis of odorant formulations

Understanding Gas Chromatography

Introduction to Capillary GC. Page 1. Agilent Restricted February 2, 2011

Chemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 27. Chem 4631

Applying the Agilent 5977A MSD to the Analysis of USP<467> Residual Solvents with the 7697A Headspace Sampler and 7890B GC

Application Note. Author. Abstract. Introduction. Hydrocarbon Processing

A New Way to Extract Off-Flavor Compounds in the Aquatic Environment. Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE)

Analysis of Terpenes in Cannabis Using the Agilent 7697A/7890B/5977B Headspace GC-MSD System

Helium conservation in volatile organic compound analysis using U.S. EPA Method 8260C

Expectations for GC-MS Lab

Simultaneous dual capillary column headspace GC with flame ionization confirmation and quantification according to USP <467> Application Note

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP: 1828 PAGE: 1 of 14 REV: 0.0 DATE: 05/12/95 ANALYSIS OF METHYL PARATHION IN CARPET SAMPLES BY GC/MS

Practical Faster GC Applications with High-Efficiency GC Columns and Method Translation Software

ACETONE IN URINE BY GC/MS Headspace Code GC10110

Optimizing Conditions for Volatiles Analysis

Transcription:

Analysis of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol Utilizing the Stratum PTC and Aquatek 70 Application Note Abstract Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol are organic compounds that have a distinct scent. These compounds also have an extremely low odor detection threshold and because of this, many drinking water laboratories require detection levels of below 10ppt. This application note investigates the detection of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol at a one part per trillion level utilizing Purge and Trap (P&T) coupled with a Gas Chromatograph and Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS). Introduction Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol have very poor purge efficiencies. In order to detect these compounds down to the 1ppt level it was necessary to optimize the P&T and GC/MS techniques. In this study, the GC/MS was run in Selective Ion Monitoring (SIM) mode while the P&T conditions were modified in order to achieve a 1ppt level of detection. A 10% (w/v) salt solution was utilized along with a 25mL purge volume in order to aid in compound detection. The Stratum PTC was configured with a #1 trap and three different injection techniques were examined in order to determine the optimum method for injection. Experimental-Instrument Conditions The Stratum PTC and Aquatek 70 Autosampler were coupled to an Agilent 7890A GC and a 5975 inert XL MS system for analysis. A #1 trap was the analytical trap used. The GC was configured with a J&W Scientific DB-VRX 30m x 0.250mm x 1.4μm column. The MS scanned in the SIM mode. The Stratum PTC transfer line was configured to the GC column three different ways. The first was through a cryofocusing module, the second was through the Split/Splitless inlet of the GC and the third configuration was a direct column connection. Finally, a 25mL purge volume of 10% (w/v) salt water was used. The GC/MS parameters are outlined in Tables 1 and 2 respectively while Tables 3 and 4 outline the P&T conditions. GC Parameters MSD Parameters GC: Agilent 7890A MSD: Agilent 5975C inert XL Column: J&W Scientific DB-VRX 30m x 0.250mm x1.4um Source: 230 C Oven Program: 40 C for 2.0 min; 16 C/min to 160 C for 0 min; 20 C /min to 240 C for 5.0 min; 18.5 min. runtime Quad: 150 C Inlet: 220 C Solvent Delay: 5.0 min Column Flow: 1.02mL/min SIM Ions 95, 107, 108, 112, 125, 126 Split: (Used for Split/Splitless 10:1 Dwell Time: 100 msec dwell per ion Inlet Injection only) Gas: Helium Pressure: 12.089 psig Table 1: GC Parameters Table 2: MS Parameters Sales/Support: 800-874-2004 Main: 513-229- 7000

Stratum PTC and AQUATek 70 Parameters Water Parameters for Cryofocusing Injection Variable Value Variable Value Pressurize Time 0.60 min Purge Time 12.00 Fill IS Time 0.00 min Purge Temp 0 C Sample Transfer Time 0.75 min Purge Flow 45mL/min Rinse Loop Time 0.75 min Dry Purge Time 5.00 min Purge Loop Time 1.00 min Dry Purge Temp 20 C Bake Rinse On Dry Purge Flow 45mL/min Number of Bake Rinses 3 GC Start End of Desorb Bake Drain Time 1.50 min Desorb Preheat Temp 220 C Bake Drain Flow 250mL/min Desorb Drain On Valve Oven Temp 175 C Desorb Time 6.00 min Transfer Line Temp 175 C Desorb Temp 225 C Sample Mount Temp 60 C Desorb Flow 300mL/min Purge ready Temp 40 C Bake Time 15.00 min Condenser Ready Temp 40 C Bake Temp 230 C Condenser Purge Temp 20 C Bake Flow 250mL/min Standby Flow 45mL/min Condenser Bake Temp 175 C Pre-Purge Time 0.0 min Focus Temp -100 C Pre-Purge Flow 0.0mL/min Inject Time 2.00 min Sample Heater On Inject Temp 200 C Sample Preheat Time 0.01 min Standby Temp 150 C Sample Temp 40 C Table 3: Stratum PTC and AQUATek Parameters for a Cryofocusing Injection Stratum PTC Parameters are in Blue Cryofocusing Parameters are in Green Stratum PTC and AQUATek 70 Parameters Water Parameters for Split/Splitless Inlet and Direct Column Injections Variable Value Variable Value Pressurize Time 0.60 min Purge Time 10.00 Fill IS Time 0.00 min Purge Temp 0 C Sample Transfer Time 0.75 min Purge Flow 100mL/min Rinse Loop Time 0.75 min Dry Purge Time 5.00 min Purge Loop Time 1.00 min Dry Purge Temp 20 C Bake Rinse On Dry Purge Flow 45mL/min Number of Bake Rinses 3 GC Start Start of Desorb Bake Drain Time 1.50 min Desorb Preheat Temp 220 C Bake Drain Flow 250mL/min Desorb Drain On

Valve Oven Temp 175 C Desorb Time 2.00 min Transfer Line Temp 175 C Desorb Temp 225 C Sample Mount Temp 60 C Desorb Flow 300mL/min Purge ready Temp 40 C Bake Time 15.00 min Condenser Ready Temp 40 C Bake Temp 230 C Condenser Purge Temp 20 C Bake Flow 250mL/min Standby Flow 45mL/min Condenser Bake Temp 175 C Pre-Purge Time Pre-Purge Flow Sample Heater Sample Preheat Time 0.0 min 0.0mL/min On 0.01 min Sample Temp 40 C Table 4: Stratum PTC and Aquatek Parameters for Split/Splitless Inlet and Direct Column Injections Stratum PTC Parameters are in Blue A 50ppb working calibration standard was prepared in methanol. standards were prepared in a 50mL volumetric flask and filled to volume with 10% (w/v) de-ionized salt water solution. The calibration range was 1.0-100ppt. The standards were transferred to headspace free 40mL vials for analysis. The calibration data was analyzed using Agilent Chemstation software. The calculated linear regression and the of each compound and their respective injection techniques are outlined in Tables 5, 6 and 7. Method Detection Limit (), Carryover, and and Accuracy Study A statistical determination of the s was determined for both of the compounds with each injection technique by analyzing seven replicate standards of a 1ppt calibration standard. Furthermore, seven replicate standards of a 10ppt calibration standard were analyzed for each injection method in order to determine the precision and accuracy of the experimental conditions. Finally, three blanks were run after a high, 100ppt calibration standard in order to determine percent carryover for each technique. The detection limits, precision and accuracy data and percent carryover for each compound and their respective injection method are provided in Tables 5, 6, and 7. Compound % Carryover Geosmin 3.94 1.000 1.00 0.114 10.00 5.80 103.89 0.13 2-Methylisoborneol 6.52 1.000 1.00 0.236 10.00 7.38 107.43 0.03 Table 5: Cryofucusing Injection Experimental Results Summary Compound %Carryover Geosmin 3.99 1.000 1.00 0.123 10.00 3.61 94.22 0.44 2-Methylisoborneol 1.70 1.000 1.00 0.206 10.00 4.25 98.39 0.10 Table 6: Split/Splitless Inlet Injection Experimental Results Summary

Compound %Carryover Geosmin 7.18 1.000 1.00 0.220 10.00 2.10 100.01 0.11 2-Methylisoborneol 7.35 1.000 1.00 0.172 10.00 2.77 103.25 0.04 Table 7: Direct Column Injection Experimental Results Summary Figure 1: Total Ion Chromatogram of a 50ppt Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol Standard Using Cryofocusing Injection Figure 2: Total Ion Chromatogram of a 50ppt Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol Standard using Split/Splitless Inlet Injection

Figure 3: Total Ion Chromatogram of a 50ppt Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol Standard Using a Direct Column Injection Conclusions The Stratum PTC and AQUATek 70 configured with an Agilent GC/MS system operating in SIM mode performed very well in detecting Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol with all three injection techniques. The linearity of all of the curves was 1.000 for both compounds with a of below 10%. The system displayed excellent accuracy and precision results and the detection limits for the compounds were below 0.250ppt for all three injection methods. The 25mL sample volume and 10% (w/v) salt solution aided in increasing the purge efficiency of both the Geosmin and the 2-Methylisoborneol compounds. Further analysis of the compound responses for all three techniques displayed that the direct column injection configuration had the optimum compound response, thus although the three techniques all showed consistent analytical results and comparable detection limits, I would recommend the direct column injection for Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol detection down to a 1ppt level.