ESTIMATION OF 90 SCATTERING COEFFICIENT IN THE SHIELDING CALCULATION OF DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EQUIPMENT

Similar documents
Rad T 290 Worksheet 2

Progress in Nuclear Science and Technology, Volume 6,

Production of X-rays. Radiation Safety Training for Analytical X-Ray Devices Module 9

Development of new educational apparatus to visualize scattered X-rays

Monte Carlo Simulation concerning Particle Therapy

PHYS 3650L - Modern Physics Laboratory

Problem P7. Stéphanie Ménard. Dosimetry Department Fontenay-aux FRANCE IRSN QUADOS IRSN

Basic physics Questions

Heuijin Lim, Manwoo Lee, Jungyu Yi, Sang Koo Kang, Me Young Kim, Dong Hyeok Jeong

STANDARD WATER PHANTOM BACKSCATTER FACTORS FOR MEDIUM ENERGY X-RAYS

Electron density and effective atomic number images generated by dual energy imaging with a 320-detector CT system: A feasibility study

Georgia Institute of Technology. Radiation Detection & Protection (Day 3)

Development of Gamma-ray Monitor using CdZnTe Semiconductor Detector

PHYS 5020 Computation and Image Processing

1Meherun Nahar, Sazzad, 3Abdus Sattar Mollah and 4Mir Mohammad Akramuzzaman Correspondence Address INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS Mathematical

USE OF DLP FOR ESTABLISHING THE SHIELDING OF MULTI- DETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ROOMS

X-ray Interaction with Matter

MEASUREMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY SPECTRA USING CdZnTe DETECTOR

Gy can be used for any type of radiation. Gy does not describe the biological effects of the different radiations.

Compton suppression spectrometry

Spectral Filtering for Improving Quality of Material Discrimination Using Dual Energy X-rays

Chapter V: Cavity theories

Evaluation of Phantom Equivalent Materials in Polychromatic Diagnostic X-Ray Beam

Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (CEA/LIST/LNHB), France (2) ENEA-Radiation Protection Institute, Bologna, Italy (3)

Shielding of Ionising Radiation with the Dosimetry & Shielding Module

(a) Mono-absorber. (b) 4-segmented absorbers. (c) 64-segmented absorbers

X-RAY SCATTERING AND MOSELEY S LAW. OBJECTIVE: To investigate Moseley s law using X-ray absorption and to observe X- ray scattering.

Secondary Neutron Dose Measurement for Proton Line Scanning Therapy

INTERACTIONS OF RADIATION WITH MATTER

Specific Accreditation Criteria Calibration ISO/IEC Annex. Ionising radiation measurements

CHARACTERISTICS OF DEGRADED ELECTRON BEAMS PRODUCED BY NOVAC7 IORT ACCELERATOR

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 3, March-2014 ISSN

Development of a Dosimetric System using Spectrometric Technique suitable for Operational Radiation Dose Measurements and Evaluation

TITLE: Air Kerma Primary Standard: Experimental and Simulation Studies on Cs-137

Calculations of Photoneutrons from Varian Clinac Accelerators and Their Transmissions in Materials*

Volume 1 No. 4, October 2011 ISSN International Journal of Science and Technology IJST Journal. All rights reserved

Midterm Radiation Physics

Radiation shielding for undulator beamline in Indus-2 synchrotron radiation source

A Radiation Monitoring System With Capability of Gamma Imaging and Estimation of Exposure Dose Rate

Radiation Shielding of Extraction Absorbers for a Fermilab Photoinjector

THE ACTIVITY CALIBRATOR

INTRODUCTION TO MEDICAL PHYSICS 1 Quiz #1 Solutions October 6, 2017

Current and Recent ICRU Activities in Radiation Protection Dosimetry and Measurements

Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2006), Vol. 118, No. 3, pp Advance Access publication 6 October 2005

Radiation exposure of personnel during IORT: radiation protection aspects.

Medical Neutron Science

Chapter 30 X Rays GOALS. When you have mastered the material in this chapter, you will be able to:

Radhakrishnan B*, Kurup P G G**, Ramakrishnan G***, Chandralingam S****

APPLIED RADIATION PHYSICS

11/19/2014. Chapter 3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. Nuclide Families. Family Nuclides with Same: Example

CHAPTER 5 EFFECTIVE ATOMIC NUMBER OF SELECTED POLYMERS BY GAMMA BACKSCATTERING TECHNIQUE

X-Rays and Scattering from Filters Used in Diagnostic Radiology

Implementing the ISO Reference Radiations at a Brazilian Calibration Laboratory

Since the beam from the JNC linac is a very high current, low energy beam, energy loss induced in the material irradiated by the beam becomes very lar

Outline. Radiation Interactions. Spurs, Blobs and Short Tracks. Introduction. Radiation Interactions 1

A Brief Introduction to Medical Imaging. Outline

ABSOLUTE AIR-KERMA MEASUREMENT IN A SYNCHROTRON LIGHT BEAM BY IONIZATION FREE-AIR CHAMBER

Two-Material Decomposition From a Single CT Scan Using Statistical Image Reconstruction

Compton Camera. Compton Camera

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 3, March-2014 ISSN

Radiation Dosimetry. Electron interactions with matter. Important processes in radiotherapy. Contents. Alun Beddoe

Occupational Radiation Protection at Accelerator Facilities: Challenges

Ba (Z = 56) W (Z = 74) preferred target Mo (Z = 42) Pb (Z = 82) Pd (Z = 64)

Comparative Analysis of Nuclear Cross Sections in Monte Carlo Methods for Medical Physics Applications

Derivation of factors for estimating the scatter of diagnostic x-rays from walls and ceiling slabs

1 Gamma-Ray Burst Polarimeter GAP aboard

A comprehensive study on energy absorption and exposure buildup factors for some Vitamins and Tissue Equivalent Materials

Document downloaded from: This paper must be cited as:

Radiation Dose, Biology & Risk

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 417 (1998) 86 94

Absorption spectra variations of EBT radiochromic film from radiation exposure

The Dose from Compton Backscatter Screening

Chapter 16 Basic Precautions

X-Ray Spectrum Generation for a Multiphase Flow Meter

Basic principles of x-ray production

October 4th, Bioengineering 508: Physical Aspects of Medical Imaging Some Elementary Particles

Computational Toolset for X-ray Spectral Analysis

Neutron source strength measurements for Varian, Siemens, Elekta, and General Electric linear accelerators

DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS IB PHYSICS

Physics of Radiography

Geant4 Monte Carlo code application in photon interaction parameter of composite materials and comparison with XCOM and experimental data

Estimation of Radioactivity and Residual Gamma-ray Dose around a Collimator at 3-GeV Proton Synchrotron Ring of J-PARC Facility

Introduction to Accelerator Physics Part 1

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

a). Air measurements : In-air measurements were carried out at a distance of 82cm from the surface of the light beam

Radiation Quantities and Units

Radiation Safety for X-ray Diffraction

Characterizations and Diagnostics of Compton Light Source

Measurement of induced radioactivity in air and water for medical accelerators

Updated Contact Dose Rate Conversion Factors for Encapsulated Gamma Sources Including Secondary Electron Emission

Recent Activities on Neutron Standardization at the Electrotechnical Laboratory

Gamma Radiation Absorption Characteristics of Concrete with Components of Different Type Materials

Determining how uncertainties in optical properties affect light dose calculations

11/23/2014 RADIATION AND DOSE MEASUREMENTS. Units of Radioactivity

Computation of energy imparted in diagnostic radiology

Measurements with the new PHE Neutron Survey Instrument

Ionizing Radiation Metrology at NMIJ/AIST and ENEA-INMRI

Neutron Fluence and Energy Spectra Around the Varian Clinac 2lOOC/23OOC Medical Accelerator

LECTURE 4 PRINCIPLE OF IMAGE FORMATION KAMARUL AMIN BIN ABDULLAH

Shell Atomic Model and Energy Levels

Transcription:

Proceedings of the Eleventh EGS4 Users' Meeting in Japan, KEK Proceedings 2003-15, p.107-113 ESTIMATION OF 90 SCATTERING COEFFICIENT IN THE SHIELDING CALCULATION OF DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EQUIPMENT K. Noto and K. Koshida* Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University 5-11-80, Kodatsuno, Kanazawa 920-0942, Japan *Department of Radiological Technology, Kanazawa University 5-11-80, Kodatsuno, Kanazawa 920-0942, Japan Abstract The calculating method of leakage effective dose in a controlled area boundary is regulated by law No. 188. When calculating the leakage dose by scattered x-rays, the 90 scattering coefficient is required. In this study, the 90 scattering coefficient was calculated using EGS4 as a function of field size and the strength of the incident x-ray spectrum and compared with the value given in law No. 188. It was found that the value given by law No. 188 underestimates the calculated value. 1. Introduction Diagnostic x-ray equipment may have three sources of x-ray leakage, from the primary x-rays, the scattered x-rays, and the x-ray tube. To calculate the effective dose of the leakage of the equipment it is necessary to determine all three. The notice of the ministry ordinance which revises the part of medical law enforcement regulation (Law No. 188) provides regulations for the various parameters used in the leakage effective dose calculation [1]. This law makes use of data from the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) [2]. Because The NCRP data was measured by self-rectified equipment at a target angle of 45, it isn t fully appropriate for diagnostic x-ray equipment mainly spreads at present. It is therefore necessary to reexamine the numerical values in law No. 188. In this study, the 90 scattering coefficient, necessary for calculating the leakage dosage by scattered x-rays, was examined. The value of the 90 scattering coefficient in law No. 188 is defined as the ratio of the exposure radiation dose at a distance of 100 cm on a 400-cm 2 organization resemblance phantom at 90 from the useful beam direction to the radiation dose from the primary beam. For different radiation fields, a simple method of calculating the coefficient by taking a ratio of field sizes was used. Monte Carlo simulation code EGS4 was used to obtain the 90 scattering coefficient for different radiation fields and incident x-ray beam strengths. The 90 scattering coefficient generated in this way was then compared to the values given in law No. 188. 2. Method and simulations 2.1 Geometry The geometry used was that given in the literature [3] and quoted by NCRP. A water phantom was used, 30 cm wide, 20 cm high, and 72 cm long. The detector used was air of volume 15 15 15 cm 3 and an SID at a distance of 100 cm (Fig.1). 2.2 X-ray spectra Incidence x-ray spectra were obtained from the equation of Birch and Marshall [4]. 90 scattering coefficient data were measured for a number of tube voltages at a target angle of 45 with filtration of 0.5 mm Al at a tube voltage of 50 kv, 1.5 mm Al at 70 kv, and 2.5 mm Al at 100 kv, 125 kv, and 150 kv. Since a target angle of 12 is currently the most 107

commonly used angle, incidence x-ray spectra at a target angle of 12 and filtration 2.5 mm Al for each tube voltage were also examined. 2.3 Simulations Firstly, the primary x-ray spectrum in air at 1 m SID without the phantom was calculated using EGS4 (KEK improved) (Fig.1-a). Next, with a phantom in place, scattered x-ray spectra at a distance of 100 cm at 90 to the useful beam direction were calculated (Fig.1-b). The history numbers were 10 7 per kev and the incident photon energy was changed from 10 kev to 150 kev in 1 kev steps. By multiplying each energy-fluence by the mass energy-absorption coefficient, the absorbed dose in air could be calculated. The 90 scattering coefficient was obtained by taking the ratio of the scattered x-ray dose to the primary ray dose. Scattering coefficients were obtained at tube voltages of 50 kv, 70 kv, 100 kv, 125 kv, and 150 kv, target angles of 45 and 12, and radiation fields of 20 20 cm 2, 28 28 cm 2, and 34 28 cm 2. 3. Results and discussion The 90 scattering coefficients for different tube voltages at a target angle of 45 are shown in Figure 2. The value of the 90 scattering coefficient calculated using EGS4 for a field size of 20 20 cm 2 is less than the value given in law No. 188 by about 20% to 40% for all tube voltage. The reason for this difference is that in the EGS4 calculated coefficient, only the 90 scattered x-ray, which comes from phantom, is detected, while the value given in law No. 188 includes the scattered radiation from the x-ray tube and the mobile restriction. The 90 scattering coefficients for the different field sizes are shown in Figure 3. The 90 scattering coefficients increase as the field size is increased. For a field size of 20 20 cm 2, the EGS4 calculated coefficient is smaller than the value given in law No. 188. However, for larger radiation fields the EGS4 calculated coefficient is greater than the values given in law No. 188. For a field size of 28 28 cm 2, the EGS4 calculated coefficient was greater than the value given in law No. 188 by 1.8 to 3.4 times. It therefore appears that law No. 188 underestimates the 90 scattering coefficient when it is calculated as a simple area ratio. The EGS4 calculated coefficient for a field size of 34 28 cm 2 is lower than that for a field size of 28 28 cm 2 by about 40% at 50 kv, about 10% at 70 kv, and 5% over 100 kv. In spite of the increase in field size, the radiation field doesn t increase at the detector but by the extended shaft side of the phantom. Therefore, the detected photon number decreases. The 90 scattering coefficients at a target angle of 12 for different tube voltages are shown in Figure 4. The coefficient at a target angle of 12 is greater than the coefficient at a target angle of 45 by a factor of about 2 at a tube voltage of 50 kv, 1.4 at 70 kv, and 1.2 over 100 kv. Table 1 shows a comparison between the values for the 90 scattering coefficient given in law No. 188 and the values calculated for a target angle of 45, 12. The calculated values are larger than those given in law No. 188 when the radiation field is large, for both target angles of 45 and 12. X-ray spectra for target angles 45 and 12 were compared in order to examine the difference in the 90 scattering spectrum for the two target angles. spectra and 90 scattering spectra are shown in Figures 5 and 6. For a target angle of 45 filtration was 0.5 mm Al at a tube voltage of 50 kv, 1.5 mm Al at 70 kv, and 2.5 mm Al at over 100 kv. However, since there is a regulation for filtration to be over 2.5 mm Al for diagnostic x-ray apparatus in medical law enforcement regulations, filtration was set at 2.5 mm Al for the target angle of 12 for all tube voltages. A filter effect is produced by this difference in filtration in the two target angles. For tube voltages of 50 kv and 70 kv the filter effect causes the effective energy of the incident x-rays to rise. The spectral shape for both target angles is almost equal over 100 kv, but the spectra for the target angle of 12 are higher than for a target angle of 45 in effective energy, since the low energy part is small. Spectra for both target angles were almost equal for the peak position of the 90 scattered radiation spectrum. However, the photon number at 50 kv and 70 kv is quite different and the detected photon number for the 12 target angle is greater than that for the 45 target angle, due to an increase in Compton scattering. Hence, it is clear that the 90 scattering coefficient changes with target angle and filtration. 108

4. Conclusions It was found that the 90 scattering coefficient calculated by EGS4 was proportional to the size of the radiation field. However, it is not a simple irradiation area ratio. Also, the 90 scattering coefficient is dependent on the target angle and filtration. At present, there are almost no diagnostic x-ray equipment with a target angle of 45 and it is necessary that the filtration be over 2.5 mm Al. Therefore, the numerical values regulated in law No. 188 may become the underestimate the 90 scattering coefficient. X-rays are scattered not only in the 90 direction, and hence studies are underway on x-rays scattered in other directions. 5. References [1] Public welfare Ministry of Labor medicine director notice, On the operation of the ministry ordinance which revises the part of medical law enforcement regulation (2001). [2] National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements: NCRP Report No.49, Structure Shielding Design and Evaluation for Medical Use of X rays and Gamma Rays of Energies Up to 10 MeV, p.59 (1976). [3] E. Dale Trout, John P. Kelly: Scattered Radiation from a Tissue-Equivalent Phantom for X Rays from 50 to 300 kvp, Radiology 104161-169 (1972). [4] R. Birch, Marshall: Computation of Bremsstrahlung X-ray Spectra and Comparison with Spectra Measured with a Ge(Li)Detector, PHYS. MED. BIOL. Vol.24, No.3, 505-517 (1978). 109

Detector : Air Phantom : Water 100cm Detector : Air 100cm X-ray tube : 10 7 for 1 kev X-ray tube : 10 7 for 1 kev 1-a : 1-b : 90 scatter x-ray Fig.1 Geometry of EGS4 simulation. Fig.2 90 scattering coefficient as the tube voltage changes at target angle 45 110

Fig.3 90 scattering coefficient as the field size changes at target angle 45 Fig.4 90 scattering coefficient as the field size changes at target angle 12 111

Table1. Comparison of EGS4 and The law No.188 50kV 50kV 70kV 90 scatter x-ray Fig.5 Comparison of primary and 90 x-ray spectrums at 50, 70kV 112

100kV 125kV 150kV Fig.6 Comparison of primary and 90 x-ray spectrums at 100, 125, 150kV 113