DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FORT WINGATE DEPOT ACTIVITY P.O. BOX 268 FORT WINGATE, NM January 20, 2012

Similar documents
Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Soil Map Polk County, Florida

Wessinger Road, Hilton Area Chapin, South Carolina

±3.18 AC. 512 Rebecca Drive Leesville, South Carolina. Lakefront Lot. Property Features. For more information:

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Kennerly Road Irmo, South Carolina

±10.89 AC. Lincreek Drive Columbia, South Carolina. Site. Property Features. For Sale. Tom Milliken

Cook Road Ridgeway, South Carolina

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

Fairfield Hill Road Winnsboro, South Carolina

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

O\.OLSSON \ ASSOC I ATES

±2.14 AC Broad River Road Irmo, South Carolina. Site. Property Features. Lee Bussell, Jr

Cook and Peach Road. Ridgeway, South Carolina. Site. For Sale ±30.12 AC Commercial Land. Tom Milliken

RANCHO de DOS PALMAS DAVIS, California, AC +/-

±35.80 AC. E/S Old Brickyard Road Irmo, South Carolina. Site. Gerald Steele Property Features.

Custom Soil Resource Report for Valley County, Montana

Custom Soil Resource Report. Soil Map. Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 14N WGS84. Feet.

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL PR OPERTIES, IN C. GALE RANCH

Custom Soil Resource Report for Blanco and Burnet Counties, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gem County Area, Idaho

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hill County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kern County, California, Southwest Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hamilton County, Texas

Introduction to Soil Science and Wetlands Kids at Wilderness Camp

Using the Web Soil Survey Resilience and Resistance Score Sheet Soils Report

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hill County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gillespie County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Missoula County Area, Montana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Bucks County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for San Juan Area, Puerto Rico

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pinal County, Arizona, Western Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Multnomah County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Santa Fe Area, New Mexico, Santa Fe County and Part of Rio Arriba County; and Santa Fe County Area, New Mexico

Custom Soil Resource Report for Falls County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Bell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Victoria County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Appendix 2b. NRCS Soil Survey

CRUM RANCH AREA MAP YOLO COUNTY, California, AC +/-

Soil Surveys. What are the most important properties to consider in a taxonomic system used for making a soil survey?

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gillespie County, Texas

Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Impoundment Liner Assessment Report

Standards and Procedures for Site Specific Soil Mapping in Rhode Island. Pg 1

Custom Soil Resource Report for Washoe County, Nevada, South Part

Appendix G. Stony Creek Project

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gillespie County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Palo Verde Area, California

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clark County, Washington

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hutchinson County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Chase County, Kansas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Okeechobee County, Florida

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Northumberland County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for Franklin County, Missouri

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon, and Marion County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Fresno County, California, Western Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for St. Lucie County, Florida

Custom Soil Resource Report for Garfield County, Oklahoma

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hansford County, Texas

SOIL TEST REPORTING ELKO SPORTS COMPLEX

SOIL TEST REPORTING ELKO SPORTS COMPLEX

Wright County, MN. Overview. Legend

Custom Soil Resource Report for Bucks County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for Livingston Parish, Louisiana

KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report LAND SUBSIDENCE KIOWA COUNTY, KANSAS. May 2, 2007

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for San Luis Obispo County, California, Paso Robles Area

BUNCOMBE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

On-Site Soils Investigation. Buttermilk Way Storm water Treatment Project Buzzards Bay. MA. February 28 th, 2012

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cumberland County, New Jersey

Maggie Payne Jim Turenne

Custom Soil Resource Report for Wasco County, Oregon, Northern Part


Custom Soil Resource Report for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for Island County, Washington

2.a.. Physical Factors General Map

Alliance Ag Services, LLC

Custom Soil Resource Report for Wright County, Minnesota

Custom Soil Resource Report for Solano County, California

3.3 CLIMATE, GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS CLIMATE GEOLOGY TOPOGRAPHY

Custom Soil Resource Report for Marion County Area, Oregon

Jim Turenne. Soils on Social Media

Aperio Property Consultants, llc E. Grand Ave. Aurora, CO Phone (303) Contact: Aaron Thompson

Custom Soil Resource Report for Custer and Pennington Counties Area, Black Hills Parts, South Dakota

Custom Soil Resource Report for Yates County, New York

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kern County, California, Northwestern Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Potter County, Texas

GIS Assessment and Modeling to Support Soil Landscape Correlation. Southern Regional Cooperative Soil Survey Conference July 17, 2008

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia

Custom Soil Resource Report for Union County, Pennsylvania

Monday, October 15 th Grab a textbook! Objective: We will explain the formation of different soils and classify soils according to particle size.

Transcription:

EPARTMENT OF THE ARM FORT WINGATE EPOT ACTIVIT P.O. BO 268 FORT WINGATE, NM 87316 January 20, 2012 Mr. John Kieling Chief, Hazardous Waste Bureau New Mexico Environment epartment 2905 Rodeo Park rive East, Building 1 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505-6303 RE: Phase 2 Soil Background Work Plan ear Mr. Kieling: The purpose of this letter work plan is to describe the approach for obtaining additional soil background data for arsenic and antimony at Fort Wingate epot Activity (FWA). Recent RFIs at Parcels 21, 11, and 22 have shown arsenic values from hundreds of samples exceeding the background value established in the Soil Background Study and ata Evaluation Report, Version 2, Final, October 2010 and the NME Soil Screening Level. The Army believes the arsenic exceedances are due to natural concentrations of arsenic in the Administration and Workshop areas being higher than those found in the October 2010 background report. See Section 3.6.1 of the Parcel 11 RFI Report for additional discussion on arsenic. The Army believes there is a similar case for arsenic and antimony at Parcel 3. The Army implemented the Background Study and ata Evaluation Work Plan (Revised), dated ecember 2009 which was approved by NME on March 2, 2010. This work plan focused sampling on ecological zones as mentioned in Section 3.0 of the 2009 work plan instead of the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil units. Attachment -1 of the 2009 work plan and Figure 1, attached, show the NRCS soil units. Note the soil units where the background samples were taken are not the same ones at Parcels 11, 21, 22 and to some extent Parcel 3. It is possible the soil units at these and other parcels have naturally higher arsenic values than those in the 2010 background report. A description of the soil units is attached. Technical Approach: This work plan proposes obtaining background samples based on the NRCS soil units and comparing this data to results at SWMUs and AOCs on the depot. Samples will be taken from the soil units covering significant portions of the northern depot and soil units upgradient of the HWMU. Samples will not be taken in SWMUs or AOCs. The rationale and sample locations are presented in Table 1 and shown in Figures 2-5. Sample locations are represented by areas to allow for minor variances in sample locations determined in the field. The technical approach will follow Sections 3 and 4 of the ecember 2009 work plan approved by NME with a few modifications. Modifications to the 2009 work plan: All samples will be taken at 6-12 below the surface which represents the surface soil at FWA where most exposure occurs. The Army plans to consult the NRCS soil scientist who originally mapped the area around FWA for the NRCS to assist in sampling and classifying the soil Printed on Recycled Paper

according to the NRCS soil types. The soil scientist may make minor location adjustments in the field based on professional judgment. igging devices may include shovels, post hole diggers, or similar. Sample devices will be decontaminated between uses. Statistical calculations similar to those in the 2010 report will be prepared for each soil unit if possible, the entire combined data set taken under this work plan, and a combined data set from this work plan and that from the 2010 report. The Army plans to obtain the samples in mid-2012 pending NME approval of this work plan. If you have questions or require further information, please call me at 330-358-7312. Sincerely, CF: Shannon uran, NME HWB ave Cobrain, NME HWB Chuck Hendrickson, U.S. EPA Region 6 Mark Patterson BRAC Environmental Coordinator

Table 1 Proposed Soil Sampling Locations and Rationale 2012 Background Study Fort Wingate epot Activity Sample epth: (6-12") NRCS Map Unit No. of Samples Per Unit Parcel No. 40 6, 11, 21 10 1 351 10 1 10 1 414 10 1 10 1 555 10 2 Location escription Sample in three locations: 1) Parcel 11 north of SWMU 3 but south of a line from the sewer plant and guard house, 2) East of the admin area and SWMU 7 in parcel 11 & 21, and 3) southwest of Bldg 51 in Parcel 6. Sample south of the kickout area in Parcel 1. Sample south of the kickout area in Parcel 1. Sample south of the kickout area in Parcel 1. Sample south of the kickout area in Parcel 1. Sample in Parcel 1 but within the kickout area. Sample north of the kickout area in Parcel 2 and west of H-Block. Metal of Interest Arsenic Arsenic & Antimony Arsenic & Antimony Arsenic & Antimony Arsenic & Antimony Arsenic & Antimony Arsenic & Antimony Rationale Notes Soil unit covers all of the admin area and most of Take 10 samples north of SWMU 3, 20 samples the workshop area and portions of Parcels 6 & 7. east of the admin area and SWMU 7, and 10 Results can be compared to numerous SWMUs/AOCs samples southwest of Bldg 51. on north FWA. Samples will be spread over the three areas to better represent north FWA. The soil unit is up grade of and inside Parcel 3 and soil from the unit washes down the arroyo to the central part of Parcel 3. Soil unit 351 is the Hogback - a large area draining into Parcel 3. The soil unit is up grade of Parcel 3 and soil from the unit washes down the arroyo to the central part of Parcel 3. The soil unit lies in and near the bottom of the arroyo collecting eroded material from surrounding units and is upsteam of the HWMU. The unit lies within the kickout area but likely contributes a significant amount of soil down at the HWMU. Soil unit covers the arroyo near SWMU 14, 15, the CAMU, and AOC 89. An Army OESS will assist in site clearance and ensure no munitions debris (potential contamination) is in the sample area. Sample between the two arroyos. Note: Map Unit descriptions are located at the end of the work plan.

Map Unit escription (Brief, Generated) McKinley County Area, New Mexico, McKinley County and Parts of Cibola and San Juan Counties [Minor map unit components are excluded from this report] - Aquima-Hawaikuh silt loams, 1 to 5 percent slopes Component: Aquima (40%) The Aquima component makes up 40 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 1 to 5 percent. This component is on alluvial fans, uplands. The parent material consists of fan alluvium over stream alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. epth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is high. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. This component is in the R035A112NM Loamy ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6c. Irrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 8 percent. The soil has a slightly sodic horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Hawaikuh (40%) The Hawaikuh component makes up 40 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 1 to 5 percent. This component is on fan remnants, uplands. The parent material consists of fan alluvium over stream alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. epth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is high. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. This component is in the R035A128NM Clayey ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6c. Irrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 8 percent. The soil has a slightly sodic horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. - Toldohn-Vessilla-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes Component: Toldohn (35%) The Toldohn component makes up 35 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 35 percent. This component is on ridges, uplands. The parent material consists of slope alluvium over residuum weathered from shale. epth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 5 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is very low. Shrink-swell potential is high. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. This component is in the F035G134NM Pinus Edulis-Juniperus Monosperma/quercus Gambelii/bouteloua Gracilis ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 7s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 2 percent. The soil has a slightly sodic horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Vessilla (30%) The Vessilla component makes up 30 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on ridges, uplands. The parent material consists of eolian deposits over slope alluvium derived from sandstone. epth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 5 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat excessively drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. This component is in the R035F618AZ Sandy Upland 13-17" P.z. Moderately eep ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 7s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. Component: Rock outcrop (20%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Rock outcrop is a miscellaneous area. 351 - Rock outcrop-vessilla complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes Component: Rock outcrop (60%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Rock outcrop is a miscellaneous area. Tabular ata Version: 8 Tabular ata Version ate: 12/09/2008 Page 1 of 4

Map Unit escription (Brief, Generated) McKinley County Area, New Mexico, McKinley County and Parts of Cibola and San Juan Counties 351 - Rock outcrop-vessilla complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes Component: Vessilla (30%) The Vessilla component makes up 30 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 35 to 70 percent. This component is on cuestas, uplands. The parent material consists of eolian deposits over slope alluvium derived from sandstone. epth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 5 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat excessively drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. This component is in the R036B014NM Shallow Loam ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 7s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. - Rock outcrop-techado-stozuni complex, 5 to 60 percent slopes Component: Rock outcrop (35%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Rock outcrop is a miscellaneous area. Component: Techado (35%) The Techado component makes up 35 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 5 to 60 percent. This component is on cuestas, uplands. The parent material consists of slope alluvium and colluvium over residuum weathered from shale. epth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 10 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is very low. Shrink-swell potential is high. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. This component is in the F039A002NM Pinus Ponderosa-Pseudotsuga Menziesii/quercus Gambelii-Cercocarpus Montanus/poa Fendleriana ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 8. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The soil has a slightly sodic horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Stozuni (25%) The Stozuni component makes up 25 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 5 to 15 percent. This component is on cuestas, uplands. The parent material consists of eolian deposits over slope alluvium derived from sandstone. epth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 5 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat excessively drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. This component is in the F039A002NM Pinus Ponderosa-Pseudotsuga Menziesii/quercus Gambelii-Cercocarpus Montanus/poa Fendleriana ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 7s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 1 percent. 414 - Zunalei-Corzuni loamy fine sands, 2 to 10 percent slopes Component: Zunalei (50%) The Zunalei component makes up 50 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 10 percent. This component is on fan remnants, uplands. The parent material consists of eolian deposits over fan alluvium derived from sandstone. epth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. This component is in the F039A007NM Pinus Ponderosa-Pinus Edulis/muhlenbergia Montana-Bouteloua Curtipendula ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6c. Tabular ata Version: 8 Tabular ata Version ate: 12/09/2008 Page 2 of 4

Map Unit escription (Brief, Generated) McKinley County Area, New Mexico, McKinley County and Parts of Cibola and San Juan Counties 414 - Zunalei-Corzuni loamy fine sands, 2 to 10 percent slopes Component: Corzuni (40%) The Corzuni component makes up 40 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 10 percent. This component is on fan remnants, uplands. The parent material consists of eolian deposits over fan alluvium derived from sandstone. epth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat excessively drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 65 percent. This component is in the F039A007NM Pinus Ponderosa-Pinus Edulis/muhlenbergia Montana-Bouteloua Curtipendula ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6c. - Bryway-Galzuni loams, 1 to 8 percent slopes Component: Bryway (50%) The Bryway component makes up 50 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on cuestas, uplands. The parent material consists of slope alluvium derived from sandstone over residuum weathered from shale. epth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is low. Shrink-swell potential is high. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. This component is in the R035A112NM Loamy ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6c. Irrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. Component: Galzuni (35%) The Galzuni component makes up 35 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 1 to 8 percent. This component is on fan remnants, uplands. The parent material consists of eolian deposits over slope alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. epth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is high. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. This component is in the R036B002NM Clayey ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6c. Irrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. The soil has a slightly sodic horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. 555 - Parkelei-Evpark fine sandy loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes Component: Parkelei (45%) The Parkelei component makes up 45 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on cuestas, uplands. The parent material consists of eolian deposits over slope alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. epth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. This component is in the F035G134NM Pinus Edulis-Juniperus Monosperma/quercus Gambelii/bouteloua Gracilis ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6c. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. The soil has a slightly sodic horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Evpark (35%) The Evpark component makes up 35 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on cuestas, uplands. The parent material consists of eolian deposits over slope alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. epth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. This component is in the R035A112NM Loamy ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6c. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 5 percent. The soil has a slightly sodic horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. Tabular ata Version: 8 Tabular ata Version ate: 12/09/2008 Page 3 of 4

Map Unit escription (Brief, Generated) The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions in this report, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. The Map Unit escription (Brief, Generated) report displays a generated description of the major soils that occur in a map unit. escriptions of non-soil (miscellaneous areas) and minor map unit components are not included. This description is generated from the underlying soil attribute data. Additional information about the map units described in this report is available in other Soil ata Mart reports, which give properties of the soils and the limitations, capabilities, and potentials for many uses. Also, the narratives that accompany the Soil ata Mart reports define some of the properties included in the map unit descriptions. Tabular ata Version: 8 Tabular ata Version ate: 12/09/2008 Page 4 of 4

4,000 2,000 0 Feet 336 561 352!«15 317 121!«14 353!«16!«17 361 212 Legend Installation Boundary 305 566!( 6 Parcel Boundary and Number 352!«25!«18!«13 566 566 305!«19!«12!«11!«21!«20 418 352!«22 405!«10B!«7 336!«23 212 361 361!«1 260 150!«10A 212 245 565 336 Soils Legend!«9!«24 566!«6!«8 240!«5A!«5B!«4A!«4B 353 555!«2 351!«3 260 351 403 414 400 418 403 403 121 Badland 317 Highdye-Evpark-Bryway complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes Knifehill loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes 418 Asaayi-Osoridge complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes 150 Riverwash-Escawetter association, 0 to 1 percent slopes Evpark-Arabrab complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes Rizno-Tekapo-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 45 percent slopes Bryway-Galzuni loams, 1 to 8 percent slopes 212 Rehobeth silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Venadito clay, 1 to 3 percent slopes 361 Monpark silty clay, 2 to 8 percent slopes 555 Parkelei-Evpark fine sandy loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes Aquima-Hawaikuh silt loams, 1 to 5 percent slopes 336 Nuffel-Venadito complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes 400 Shoemaker-Stozuni complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes 561 Flugle-Plumasano association, 2 to 8 percent slopes 240 Breadsprings and Nahodish soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes Toldohn-Vessilla-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes 403 Valnor-Techado complex, 2 to 25 percent slopes 565 Plumasano-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes 245 Buckle-Gapmesa-Barboncito complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes 351 Rock outcrop-vessilla complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes Rock outcrop-techado-stozuni complex, 5 to 60 percent slopes 566 Bamac extremely gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 50 percent slopes 260 Quarries and pits 352 Zia sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes 405 Fortwingate-Owlrock complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes 305 Celavar-Atarque complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes 353 Mido loamy fine sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes 414 Zunalei-Corzuni loamy fine sands, 2 to 10 percent slopes Fort Wingate epot Activity, New Mexico Soils Map Figure 1

566 212 «11 212 «12 «6 «7 352 352 «21 20 Samples «13 566 «22 ³ 100 50 0 100 200 300 Feet Fort Wingate epot Activity SURFACE SOIL MAP PRELIMINAR SITE STU NORTH AREA BACKGROUN SAMPLING PHASE II Figure 2

33 5 5 33 555 2 «Gate 209 Parcel 3 555 Igloo Block J Kickout Aea Boundary 555 «3 ³ 100 50 0 100 200 300 Feet Fort Wingate epot Activity SURFACE SOIL MAP PRELIMINAR SITE STU SOUTH AREA 1 BACKGROUN SAMPLING PHASE II Figure 3

Parcel 3 OBO Area 3 «Gate 209C Parcel 3/Parcel 1 Boundary Fence 1 «414 Kickout Area Boundary 351 414 0 35 Kickout Area ³ 40 3 351 403 100 50 0 100 200 300 Feet Fort Wingate epot Activity SURFACE SOIL MAP PRELIMINAR SITE STU SOUTH AREA 2 BACKGROUN SAMPLING PHASE II Figure 4

Kickout Area 35 0 Kickout Area Boundary 403 4 41 414 351 35 1 351 40 3 1 «200 100 0 50 100 ³ 300 Feet Fort Wingate epot Activity SURFACE SOIL MAP PRELIMINAR SITE STU SOUTH AREA 3 BACKGROUN SAMPLING PHASE II Figure 5