A3D Hybrid Model of ahelicon Source +

Similar documents
MODELING OF AN ECR SOURCE FOR MATERIALS PROCESSING USING A TWO DIMENSIONAL HYBRID PLASMA EQUIPMENT MODEL. Ron L. Kinder and Mark J.

SIMULATIONS OF ECR PROCESSING SYSTEMS SUSTAINED BY AZIMUTHAL MICROWAVE TE(0,n) MODES*

OPTIMIZATION OF PLASMA UNIFORMITY USING HOLLOW-CATHODE STRUCTURE IN RF DISCHARGES*

SPUTTER-WIND HEATING IN IONIZED METAL PVD+

INVESTIGATION of Si and SiO 2 ETCH MECHANISMS USING an INTEGRATED SURFACE KINETICS MODEL

PARTICLE CONTROL AT 100 nm NODE STATUS WORKSHOP: PARTICLES IN PLASMAS

INTRODUCTION TO THE HYBRID PLASMA EQUIPMENT MODEL

A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF RADIATION TRAPPING IN ELECTRODELESS GAS DISCHARGES HAVING COMPLEX GEOMETRIES*

MODELING OF SEASONING OF REACTORS: EFFECTS OF ION ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS TO CHAMBER WALLS*

I. INTRODUCTION J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16 4, Jul/Aug /98/16 4 /2454/9/$ American Vacuum Society 2454

MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF RADIATION TRAPPING IN ELECTRODELESS LAMPS: A STUDY OF COLLISIONAL BROADENERS*

Wave propagation and power deposition in magnetically enhanced inductively coupled and helicon plasma sources

SCALING OF HOLLOW CATHODE MAGNETRONS FOR METAL DEPOSITION a)

ANGULAR DEPENDENCE OF ELECTRON VELOCITY DISTRIBUTIONS IN LOW-PRESSURE INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMAS 1

Physique des plasmas radiofréquence Pascal Chabert

EFFECT OF REACTOR GEOMETRY ON ION ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR PULSED PLASMA DOPING (P 2 LAD)*

EFFECT OF PRESSURE AND ELECTRODE SEPARATION ON PLASMA UNIFORMITY IN DUAL FREQUENCY CAPACITIVELY COUPLED PLASMA TOOLS *

CONSEQUENCES OF RADIATION TRAPPING ON ELECTRON ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS IN LOW PRESSURE INDUCTIVELY COUPLED Hg/Ar DISCHARGES*

ELECTRON ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS AND NON-COLLISIONAL HEATING IN MAGNETICALLY ENHANCED INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMAS*

Plasma Modeling with COMSOL Multiphysics

Effect of Gas Flow Rate and Gas Composition in Ar/CH 4 Inductively Coupled Plasmas

CONTROL OF UNIFORMITY IN CAPACITIVELY COUPLED PLASMAS CONSIDERING EDGE EFFECTS*

The low-field density peak in helicon discharges

Consequences of asymmetric pumping in low pressure plasma processing reactors: A three-dimensional modeling study

SIMULATION OF POROUS LOW-k DIELECTRIC SEALING BY COMBINED He AND NH 3 PLASMA TREATMENT *

Low-field helicon discharges

Low Temperature Plasma Technology Laboratory

Investigation of the DSMC Approach for Ion/neutral Species in Modeling Low Pressure Plasma Reactor

Low Temperature Plasma Technology Laboratory

Angular anisotropy of electron energy distributions in inductively coupled plasmas

Diffusion during Plasma Formation

Hong Young Chang Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Republic of Korea

DEPOSITION AND COMPOSITION OF POLYMER FILMS IN FLUOROCARBON PLASMAS*

Model for noncollisional heating in inductively coupled plasma processing sources

Influences on ionization fraction in an inductively coupled ionized physical vapor deposition device plasma

Modélisation de sources plasma froid magnétisé

65 th GEC, October 22-26, 2012

Spatial distributions of power and ion densities in RF excited remote plasma reactors

Helicon Plasma Thruster Experiment Controlling Cross-Field Diffusion within a Magnetic Nozzle

Jackson 6.4 Homework Problem Solution Dr. Christopher S. Baird University of Massachusetts Lowell

Low Temperature Plasma Technology Laboratory

A time dependent propagator method for long mean free path transport of neutral particles in plasma processing reactors

fiziks Institute for NET/JRF, GATE, IIT-JAM, JEST, TIFR and GRE in PHYSICAL SCIENCES

LOW-PRESSURE radio-frequency (RF) inductive-coupled

Multi-fluid Simulation Models for Inductively Coupled Plasma Sources

Introduction to Plasma Physics

UNIT-I INTRODUCTION TO COORDINATE SYSTEMS AND VECTOR ALGEBRA

Contents: 1) IEC and Helicon 2) What is HIIPER? 3) Analysis of Helicon 4) Coupling of the Helicon and the IEC 5) Conclusions 6) Acknowledgments

A Working Electron Impact Cross Section Set for CHF 3. Mark J. Kushner a) and Da Zhang b) University of Illinois 1406 W. Green St Urbana, IL 61801

Faraday s Law. Underpinning of Much Technology

The plasma simulation system Brochure.

2D Hybrid Fluid-Analytical Model of Inductive/Capacitive Plasma Discharges

Electromagnetic Fields. Lecture 2. Fundamental Laws

Plasma waves in the fluid picture I

Characteristics and classification of plasmas

Cluster fusion in a high magnetic field

EP2Plus: a hybrid plasma. plume/spacecraft. interaction code. F. Cichocki, M. Merino, E. Ahedo

Numerical simulation of Vibrationally Active Ar-H2 Microwave Plasma

1. A moving kaon decays into two pions, one of which is left at rest. (m K

Shapes of agglomerates in plasma etching reactors

Electromagnetics in COMSOL Multiphysics is extended by add-on Modules

Plasma abatement of perfluorocompounds in inductively coupled plasma reactors

PRINCIPLES OF PLASMA DISCHARGES AND MATERIALS PROCESSING

General Physics II. Electromagnetic Induction and Electromagnetic Waves

MICRODISCHARGES AS SOURCES OF PHOTONS, RADICALS AND THRUST*

Effect of sputter heating in ionized metal physical vapor deposition reactors

Introduction to Electric Circuit Analysis

Last time. Gauss' Law: Examples (Ampere's Law)

A KINETIC MODEL FOR EXCIMER UV AND VUV RADIATION IN DIELECTRIC BARRIER DISCHARGES*

SCALING OF PLASMA SOURCES FOR O 2 ( 1 ) GENERATION FOR CHEMICAL OXYGEN-IODINE LASERS

Numerical Study of Power Deposition, Transport and Acceleration Phenomena in Helicon Plasma Thrusters

Overview of FRC-related modeling (July 2014-present)

Review of Electrodynamics

FARADAY S AND LENZ LAW B O O K P G

Two-dimensional Fluid Simulation of an RF Capacitively Coupled Ar/H 2 Discharge

Electron Density and Ion Flux in Diffusion Chamber of Low Pressure RF Helicon Reactor

Faraday's Law ds B B G G ΦB B ds Φ ε = d B dt

Jacob s Ladder Controlling Lightning

Plasma transport around dust agglomerates having complex shapes

2. Q. 1 to 5 are Very short Answer type questions (1 Mark each. ) 3. Q. 6 to 12 are short Answer type questions. (2 Marks each. )

Electromagnetic Induction

DHANALAKSHMI SRINIVASAN INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY

TENTATIVE CONTENTS OF THE COURSE # EE-271 ENGINEERING ELECTROMAGNETICS, FS-2012 (as of 09/13/12) Dr. Marina Y. Koledintseva

The Plasma Simulation System Brochure.

PHYSICS - GIANCOLI CALC 4E CH 29: ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION.

Waves in plasmas. S.M.Lea

Chapter 22. Induction

Plasmas rf haute densité Pascal Chabert LPTP, Ecole Polytechnique

Simulation of Low Pressure Plasma Processing Reactors: Kinetics of Electrons and Neutrals

Part 4: Electromagnetism. 4.1: Induction. A. Faraday's Law. The magnetic flux through a loop of wire is

PLASMA processing (etching, deposition, cleaning) is one

Dispersive Media, Lecture 7 - Thomas Johnson 1. Waves in plasmas. T. Johnson

EE 3324 Electromagnetics Laboratory

Modeling and Simulation of Plasma Based Applications in the Microwave and RF Frequency Range

Fast particle production in laser-irradiated targets

Using a Microwave Interferometer to Measure Plasma Density Mentor: Prof. W. Gekelman. P. Pribyl (UCLA)

4 Modeling of a capacitive RF discharge

EFFECTS OF PROPENE ON THE REMEDIATION OF NOx FROM DIESEL EXHAUSTS*

Tokamak Divertor System Concept and the Design for ITER. Chris Stoafer April 14, 2011

Electromagnetism Answers to Problem Set 9 Spring 2006

Transcription:

A3D Hybrid Model of ahelicon Source + Eric R. Keiter* and Mark J. Kushner** Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering 146 W. Green St., Urbana, IL 6181 USA Http://uigelz.ece.uiuc.edu 1st Gaseous Electronics Conference October 1998 +Work supported by Semiconductor Research Corp. and AFOSR/DARPA. * e-mail: mjk@uiuc.edu ** Present Address: Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque, NM, USA

Agenda!!!!! Abstract ModelDescription -waveequation -tensorconductivity Results,NagoyaTypeIIIcoil Results,M=Coil Conclusions Gec98_Helicon1

Abstract As the semiconductor industry moves to larger wafer sizes ($>$3mm) effecient new plasma sources which are capable of maintaining process uniformity at large scale will be needed. Helicon sources have been proposedasapossiblealternativetoinductivelycoupledplasmasources, duetohighefficiency,andthepowerdepositionnotbeinglimitedtoaskin depth. Additionally, helicon plasmas operate at very low pressure, so particulate contamination is minimal. In this paper, we present results fromanumericalstudyofaheliconsource. Thethreedimensionalhybrid plasmaequipmentmodel(hpem3d)hasbeenextendedtoincludeacold plasmatensorconductivityintheelectromagnetics(em)module. Astatic magneticfield isgenerated byasolenoid whichsurrounds thecylindrical reactor geometry and is simulated by solving for the vector potential. Transport of charged and neutral species is handled with a fluid simulation. By varying parameters such as the static magnetic field magnitude,reactorgeometry,andcoilconfiguration,weareabletomodify thepowerdepositionprofile. Thisinturndeterminesthedownstreamion and neutral flux uniformity. We find that for larger magnetic fields, the powerdepositionpenetratesmoredeeplyintothebulkplasma. Gec98_Helicon2

Scehmatic of 3D Hybrid Plasma Equipment Model (HPEM-3D)! HPEM-3D combines modules which address different physics or different timescales. E(r,z, θ) Magneto- Statics Module Circuit Module I,V Electromagnetics Module σ(r,z, θ ) E(r,z, θ) B(r,z, θ) Electron Energy Equation/ Boltzmann Module N(r,z, θ) P(r,z, θ) Φ(r,z, θ ) T(r,z, e θ) S(r,z, θ) µ (r,z, θ ) Electron Transport (Continuity) Ion Transport (Continuity, Momentum) Surface Kinetics Ambipolar Transport/ Sheath Poisson Solution Gec98_Helicon3

Electric Field Module: Wave Equation! The electric field module of the HPEM-3D is responsible for solving the 3D frequency domain wave equation: 2 E = µ ε ω E iµ ωj iωµ σe ant a f 2! The left hand side is replaced by: E = E E where the first term is neglected.! The conductivity, σ,is the cold plasma tensor conductivity (see next slide)! The finite difference form of the wave equation results in alarge matrix equation, whichis solved using ageneralized minimum residual method.!!! The Helicon wavelength can be estimated by If λ is small compared to reactor size, the numerical solution of the wave equation is difficult, as the problem is less well conditioned. The matrix problem is solved using the generalized minimum residual method. λ = 1. x1 2 B ωrn Gec98_Helicon4

Conductivity Tensor! The plasma current in the wave equation is handled by acold plasma tensor conductivity: σ = σ mv qa α 1 + B m 2 2 c h F G H 2 2 α + B αb + B B αb + B B r z r θ θ r z 2 2 αb + B B α + B αb + B B z r θ θ r θ z 2 2 θ r z r θ z z αb + B B αb + B B α + B I J K α = a iω q + v / m m f σ 2 = q m mv m! The addition of the static magnetic field results in alarger,less well conditioned matrix problem.! If the static magnetic field is predominantly in the z-direction, the (3,3) term of the tensor dominates Gec98_Helicon

Antenna Configuration! Two different antenna configurations were used: Nagoya Type III Double Ring (m=) J J! The Nagoya Type III is commonly used in laboratory Helicon plasmas, where it has been shown to produce an m=1 mode under the right conditions.! The Double Ring configuration was tested here to see if using it would resultin am=heliconmode. Gec98_Helicon6

Reactor Geometry 3 3 Side (r,z) view Showerhead Solenoid Top (r, θ)view, m= coil 2 1 Antenna Coil Dielectric Reactor wall Solenoid Top (r, θ)view, Nagoya Type III coil Coil Wafer! Antenna coil can either be the m= or Nagoya Type III configuration Gec98_Helicon7-1 1 2 Solenoid Coil

Plasma Parameters! M=cases: Pressure:.mTorr TotalPowerDeposition: 12Watts StaticMagneticField:,6,9Gauss Gas:Argon ReactorHeight:3cm ReactorRadius:1cm! NagoyaTypeIIIcases: Pressure:.mTorr TotalPowerDeposition: 6Watts StaticMagneticField:,3,6Gauss Gas:Argon ReactorHeight:3cm ReactorRadius:1cm Gec98_Helicon8

No Static Magnetic Field (B=), Nagoya Type III Coil AR 3.8E+11 1.78777E+11 1.377E+11 6.2327E+1 3.49617E+1 2.2933E+1 1.17791E+1 6.83713E+9 3.9688E+9 2.334E+9 1.3377E+9 7.7697E+8 4.481E+8 2.61479E+8 1.1774E+8 8.8964E+7.113E+7 2.9681E+7 1.72282E+7 1E+7 E-MAG 31.1429 18.662 1.483 6.7968 3.2686 2.49 1.18687.68811.39949.2317.13441.779723.42322.26239.2217.88319.1224.2976.172382.1 Argon Ion Density (cm-3) Electric Field Total Magnitude With no magnetostatic field, the plasma is in purely inductive mode. The power deposition is confined near the coil. Gec98_Helicon1

No Static Magnetic Field (B=), Nagoya Type III Coil 3 3 2 1 2.97469E+11 2.77638E+11 2.786E+11 2.3797E+11 2.18144E+11 1.98313E+11 1.78481E+11 1.86E+11 1.38819E+11 1.18988E+11 9.963E+1 7.93E+1.94938E+1 3.966E+1 1.98313E+1 3 3 2 1 27.831 13.486 6.4494 3.1743 1.4993.72143.346679.166893.83426.386772.186193.89634.431.27726.1 3 3 2 1.681.36386.16232.89187.488.9162.139764.73741.46488.219216.118222.63764.343834.18428.1-1 1 2-1 1 2-1 1 2 Argon Ion Density (cm -3 ) Electric Field Total Magnitude Total Power Deposition (Log Watt/cm -3 ) Top view: With no magnetostatic field, the plasma is in purely inductive mode. Gec98_Helicon11

No Static Magnetic Field (B=), Nagoya Type III Coil 3 3 2 1 1.1.9318.32693.21.7988.4886.291.17296.176.28211.1446.741738.38336.1922.1 3 3 2 1 26.331 12.7367 6.8 2.9716 1.43793.694966.33884.162336.78489.3792.183271.8877.42812.2696.1 3 3 2 1 1.1.9318.32693.21.7988.4886.291.17296.176.28211.1446.741738.38336.1922.1-1 1 2-1 1 2-1 1 2 Argon Ion Density (cm -3 ) Electric Field Total Magnitude Total Power Deposition (Log Watt/cm -3 ) Top view: With no magnetostatic field, the plasma is in purely inductive mode. Gec98_Helicon12

Static Magnetic Field (B=3 G), Nagoya Type III Coil AR 1.2E+12.891E+11 3.296E+11 1.618E+11 8.998E+1 4.9397E+1 2.67262E+1 1.46E+1 7.9389E+9 4.32619E+9 2.3773E+9 1.28494E+9 7.283E+8 3.81648E+8 2.799E+8 1.133E+8 6.17777E+7 3.36683E+7 1.83489E+7 1E+7 E-MAG 39.762 22.3992 12.8396 7.3993 4.2188 2.41832 1.38623.794612.4486.26193.149664.879.491764.281889.1684.926229.3932.3434.17443.1 Argon Ion Density (cm-3) Electric Field Total Magnitude With the addition of a magnetostatic field, power deposition extends downstream away from the coils. Gec98_Helicon13

Static Magnetic Field (B=3 G), Nagoya Type III Coil 3 3 2 1 2.4281E+11 1.9663E+11 1.7744E+11 1.634E+11 1.4986E+11 1.36188E+11 1.269E+11 1.89E+11 9.3313E+1 8.171E+1 6.8938E+1.447E+1 4.863E+1 2.7237E+1 1.36188E+1 3 3 2 1 38.463 18.913 8.182 4.382 1.883.88692.41681.19613.9241.433998.24169.9649.4181.2168.1 3 3 2 1.29363.16699.936872.29712.2992.16934 9.749E-.4132E- 3.684E- 1.7361E- 9.78498E-6.3248E-6 3.1281E-6 1.76864E-6 1E-6-1 1 2-1 1 2-1 1 2 Argon Ion Density (cm -3 ) Electric Field Total Magnitude Total Power Deposition (Log Watt/cm -3 ) Top view: With the addition of a magnetostatic field, power deposition extends downstream from the coils. Power deposition near the theta component of the coils is reduced. Gec98_Helicon14

Static Magnetic Field (B=3 G), Nagoya Type III Coil 3 3 2 1.7438E+11.377E+11 4.98713E+11 4.63E+11 4.21988E+11 3.836E+11 3.4263E+11 3.69E+11 2.6838E+11 2.317E+11 1.91813E+11 1.34E+11 1.88E+11 7.67E+1 3.836E+1 3 3 2 1 26.331 12.7367 6.8 2.9716 1.43793.694966.33884.162336.78489.3792.183271.8877.42812.2696.1 3 3 2 1 4.6387 2.321.999476.463936.2349.99967.463997.2378.999738.4647.246.999869.464118.2434.1-1 1 2-1 1 2-1 1 2 Argon Ion Density (cm -3 ) Electric Field Total Magnitude Total Power Deposition (Log Watt/cm -3 ) Top view: With the addition of a magnetostatic field, power deposition extends downstream from the coils. The addition of a Bz magnetic field results in the power deposition mostly being near the z component of the coil. Gec98_Helicon

Static Magnetic Field (B=6 G), Nagoya Type III Coil AR 1.2667E+12.9332E+11 3.4727E+11 1.6616E+11 9.446E+1 4.9276E+1 2.6846E+1 1.466E+1 7.9688E+9 4.34E+9 2.362E+9 1.28847E+9 7.1966E+8 3.82434E+8 2.832E+8 1.1311E+8 6.18413E+7 3.36914E+7 1.832E+7 1E+7 E-MAG 39.1143 22.4199 12.88 7.3697 4.2229 2.426 1.387.7911.4744.261227.149733.882.491941.28197.1616.926419.3114.34371.174462.1 Argon Ion Density (cm -3 ) Electric Field Total Magnitude With the addition of a magnetostatic field, power deposition extends downstream away from the coils. Gec98_Helicon16

Static Magnetic Field (B=6 G), Nagoya Type III Coil 3 3 2 1 2.4281E+11 1.9663E+11 1.7744E+11 1.634E+11 1.4986E+11 1.36188E+11 1.269E+11 1.89E+11 9.3313E+1 8.171E+1 6.8938E+1.447E+1 4.863E+1 2.7237E+1 1.36188E+1 3 3 2 1 38.4938 18.177 8.1794 4.688 1.88486.886647.41783.196198.922927.434.24226.96691.41914.2183.1 3 3 2 1.128344.639.332249.16947 8.619E- 4.37621E- 2.2266E- 1.13289E-.76411E-6 2.93276E-6 1.49218E-6 7.9217E-7 3.86288E-7 1.9642E-7 1E-7-1 1 2-1 1 2-1 1 2 Argon Ion Density (cm -3 ) Electric Field Total Magnitude Total Power Deposition (Log Watt/cm -3 ) Top view: With the addition of a magnetostatic field, power deposition extends downstream away from the coils. Enhanced power deposition near z- component of the coils. Gec98_Helicon17

Static Magnetic Field (B=6 G), Nagoya Type III Coil 3 3 2 1.7994E+11.4487E+11.1881E+11 4.6327E+11 4.24669E+11 3.8662E+11 3.4746E+11 3.88E+11 2.7244E+11 2.31637E+11 1.9331E+11 1.44E+11 1.819E+11 7.721E+1 3.8662E+1 3 3 2 1 33.363.823 7.3371 3.83 1.74.88643.38432.182637.86797.412497.19636.931649.44276.21419.1 3 3 2 1 4.6631 2.16 1.346.46629.21664.19.46228.2878.1173.464827.2691.186.464426.2.1-1 1 2-1 1 2-1 1 2 Argon Ion Density (cm -3 ) Top view: Electric Field Total Magnitude Total Power Deposition (Log Watt/cm -3 ) With the addition of a magnetostatic field, power deposition extends downstream from the coils. The addition of a Bz magnetic field results in the power deposition mostly being near the z component of the coil. Gec98_Helicon18

No Static Magnetic Field (B=), M= Coil.84667E+11 3.2819E+11 1.84132E+11 1.3333E+11.79894E+1 3.431E+1 1.82629E+1 1.2489E+1.716E+9 3.22774E+9 1.81138E+9 1.163E+9.7466E+8 3.214E+8 1.7969E+8 1.823E+8.689E+7 3.1726E+7 1.78193E+7 1E+7 38.81 22.132 12.694 7.2813 4.1768 2.397 1.37418.788237.4213.9347.148762.833.48949.2876.16142.92374.29864.33932.174336.1 Argon Ion Density (cm-3) Electric Field Total Magnitude (Log V/cm) With no magnetostatic field, the plasma is in purely inductive mode. Gec98_Helicon19

No Static Magnetic Field (B=), M= Coil 3 3 2 1.6466E+11.2713E+11 4.89369E+11 4.17E+11 4.1481E+11 3.76438E+11 3.38794E+11 3.1E+11 2.636E+11 2.863E+11 1.88219E+11 1.7E+11 1.12931E+11 7.287E+1 3.76438E+1 3 3 2 1 37.9781 17.8823 8.4 3.9646 1.86679.878994.413882.19488.91768.43264.23441.97919.4144.212378.1 3 3 2 1 1.7846.886621.44622.21897.18823.4816.268768.13369.663793.329884.163941.81473.44897.2122.1-1 1 2-1 1 2-1 1 2 Argon Ion Density (cm -3 ) Electric Field Total Magnitude Total Power Deposition (Log Watt/cm -3 ) Top view: With no magnetostatic field, the plasma is in purely inductive mode. Gec98_Helicon2

Static Magnetic Field: B=6 G, M= Coil.3348E+11 3.6E+11 1.6916E+11 9.949E+1.398E+1 3.4E+1 1.71436E+1 9.66776E+9.4191E+9 3.7448E+9 1.73378E+9 9.77726E+8.1366E+8 3.193E+8 1.7342E+8 9.888E+7.7611E+7 3.1442E+7 1.77328E+7 1E+7 836.19 477.617 272.87.823 89.31.837 29.372 16.86 9.47338.4113 3.969 1.763 1.834.7944.328969.18791.17326.61328.31.2 Argon Ion Density (cm -3 ) Electric Field Total Magnitude The addition of the magnetic field (B z =6G), the electrons tend to follow the magnetic field lines, and the heating region becomes elongated down the z-axis. Gec98_Helicon21

Static Magnetic Field: B=6 G, M= Coil 3 3 2 1.E+11 4.88E+11 4.11E+11 4.164E+11 3.817E+11 3.47E+11 3.123E+11 2.776E+11 2.429E+11 2.82E+11 1.73E+11 1.388E+11 1.41E+11 6.94E+1 3.47E+1 3 3 2 1 823.1 311.123 117.98 44.4494 16.89 6.338 2.43.97262.3429.129618.489929.18182.699949.26466.1 3 3 2 1.4.2472.1369.74394.47821.2237.1268.671937.368368.21946.1171.66933.332732.18249.1-1 1 2-1 1 2-1 1 2 Argon Ion Density (cm -3 ) Electric Field Total Magnitude Total Power Deposition (Log Watt/cm -3 ) Top view: The addition of the magnetic field (B z =6G), the electrons tend to follow the magnetic field lines, and the heating region becomes elongated down the z-axis. Gec98_Helicon22

Static Magnetic Field: B=9 G, M= Coil.33429E+11 3.83E+11 1.696E+11 9.624E+1.39389E+1 3.416E+1 1.72E+1 9.67212E+9.4417E+9 3.764E+9 1.73437E+9 9.782E+8.11E+8 3.11E+8 1.737E+8 9.88949E+7.7674E+7 3.14476E+7 1.7733E+7 1E+7 1273.33 68.9 369.471 199.21 17.26 7.7479 31.168 16.761 9.9 4.86196 2.61897 1.417.7992.49343.22499.11877.639799.344637.18644.1 Argon Ion Density (cm -3 ) Electric Field Total Magnitude As the magnetic field increases from 6 Gauss to 9 Gauss, the electric field penetration increases. Gec98_Helicon23

Static Magnetic Field: B=9 G, M= Coil 3 3 2 1.2969E+11 4.86237E+11 4.6E+11 4.1677E+11 3.8244E+11 3.47312E+11 3.181E+11 2.778E+11 2.43119E+11 2.8387E+11 1.7366E+11 1.389E+11 1.4194E+11 6.946E+1 3.47312E+1 3 3 2 1 13.44 49.72 168.634 61.838 22.6876 8.32164 3.232 1.1197.4161.624.2478.2264.743289.272633.1 3 3 2 1.462844.329.138612.78.4114.22717.124318.68326.37236.23743.111498.61169.333913.182733.1-1 1 2-1 1 2-1 1 2 Argon Ion Density (cm -3 ) Electric Field Total Magnitude Total Power Deposition (Log Watt/cm -3 ) Top view: As the magnetic field increases from 6 Gauss to 9 Gauss, the electric field penetration increases. Gec98_Helicon2