technological change and economic growth more fragmented; slower, higher population growth middle emissions path

Similar documents
chapter 3. Climate Change Summary

A Study of the Uncertainty in Future Caribbean Climate Using the PRECIS Regional Climate Model

Southern New England s Changing Climate. Raymond S. Bradley and Liang Ning Northeast Climate Science Center University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Soil Erosion Vulnerability Across the Conterminous U.S.

Experiments with Statistical Downscaling of Precipitation for South Florida Region: Issues & Observations

Using a library of downscaled climate projections to teach climate change analysis

Climate Change Scenarios Dr. Elaine Barrow Canadian Climate Impacts Scenarios (CCIS) Project

Climate Summary for the Northern Rockies Adaptation Partnership

Future population exposure to US heat extremes

BUILDING A GRIDDED CLIMATOLOGICAL DATASET FOR USE IN THE STATISTICAL INTERPRETATION OF NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION MODELS

INVESTIGATING THE SIMULATIONS OF HYDROLOGICAL and ENERGY CYCLES OF IPCC GCMS OVER THE CONGO AND UPPER BLUE NILE BASINS

Supplemental Information The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography

NOAA s National Weather Service

Use of PRISM Data. for Precipitation Estimates. in ESPAM2 AS BUILT

Northern Rockies Adaptation Partnership: Climate Projections

Training: Climate Change Scenarios for PEI. Training Session April Neil Comer Research Climatologist

Using Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) data product for climate projections

Twenty-first-century projections of North Atlantic tropical storms from CMIP5 models

Zambia. General Climate. Recent Climate Trends. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Temperature. C. McSweeney 1, M. New 1,2 and G.

Credibility of climate predictions revisited

Julie A. Winkler. Raymond W. Arritt. Sara C. Pryor. Michigan State University. Iowa State University. Indiana University

Mozambique. General Climate. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. C. McSweeney 1, M. New 1,2 and G. Lizcano 1

UP-TO-DATE MONTHLY CLIMATE MAPS FOR THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 5, May ISSN

Climatic and Ecological Conditions in the Klamath Basin of Southern Oregon and Northern California: Projections for the Future

Historical North Cascades National Park. +2.7ºC/century (+4.9ºF./century)

Climate Dataset: Aitik Closure Project. November 28 th & 29 th, 2018

Climate Variability and Change Past, Present and Future An Overview

Confronting Climate Change in the Great Lakes Region. Technical Appendix Climate Change Projections CLIMATE MODELS

Authors. Keywords: Climate scenario, downscaling, PRISM, natural renewable resource assessments, RPA Scenarios.

Future Climate Projection in Mainland Southeast Asia: Climate change scenario for 21 st century. Suppakorn Chinvanno

CLIMATE SIMULATIONS AND PROJECTIONS OVER RUSSIA AND THE ADJACENT SEAS: а CMIP5 Update

Prediction of Climate Change Impacts in Tanzania using Mathematical Models: The Case of Dar es Salaam City

Malawi. General Climate. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. C. McSweeney 1, M. New 1,2 and G. Lizcano 1

THE CANADIAN CENTRE FOR CLIMATE MODELLING AND ANALYSIS

The CLIMGEN Model. More details can be found at and in Mitchell et al. (2004).

Use of climate reanalysis for EEA climate change assessment. Blaz Kurnik. European Environment Agency (EEA)

Climate Data: Diagnosis, Prediction and Projection

Cape Verde. General Climate. Recent Climate. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Temperature. Precipitation

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

FUTURE CARIBBEAN CLIMATES FROM STATISTICAL AND DYNAMICAL DOWNSCALING

The ENSEMBLES Project

Update on Climate Science. Professor Richard Betts, Met Office

Climate Change RMJOC Study Summary

Climate Change Scenario, Climate Model and Future Climate Projection

knowledge Generation of related to future climate: downscaling by the Meteorological Service of Catalonia

Extremes Events in Climate Change Projections Jana Sillmann

Climate Impacts Projections

Climate Change Models: The Cyprus Case

P6.3 QPFHELPER: APPLICATION OF THE MOUNTAIN MAPPER FORECAST TECHNIQUE WITHIN THE GRAPHICAL FORECAST EDITOR

Climate projections for the Chesapeake Bay and Watershed based on Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA)

More extreme precipitation in the world s dry and wet regions

Multi-model climate change scenarios for southwest Western Australia and potential impacts on streamflow

The general procedure for estimating 24-hour PMP includes the following steps:

INTRODUCTION Landslides are bad but good

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF OREGON

Using PRISM Climate Grids and GIS for Extreme Precipitation Mapping

North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program

Future freshwater stress for island populations

Current Climate Science and Climate Scenarios for Florida

Research on Climate of Typhoons Affecting China

Climate Risk Profile for Samoa

Philosophy, Development, Application, and Communication of Future Climate Scenarios for the Pileus Project

Development of Projected Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves for Welland, Ontario, Canada

CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT PREDICTION IN UPPER MAHAWELI BASIN

Summary of Seasonal Normal Review Investigations. DESC 31 st March 2009

Climate Projections and Energy Security

Projected Impacts of Climate Change in Southern California and the Western U.S.

Suriname. General Climate. Recent Climate Trends. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Temperature. C. McSweeney 1, M. New 1,2 and G.

Assessment of the reliability of climate predictions based on comparisons with historical time series

Future extreme precipitation events in the Southwestern US: climate change and natural modes of variability

NARCCAP and NetCDF. Seth McGinnis & Toni Rosati IMAGe NCAR.

Changes in Frequency of Extreme Wind Events in the Arctic

Muhammad Noor* & Tarmizi Ismail

CLIMATE OF THE ZUMWALT PRAIRIE OF NORTHEASTERN OREGON FROM 1930 TO PRESENT

Climate projection data, information, and knowledge: Perspectives from USGCRP s leadership role at the boundary of science advancement and application

Jay Lawrimore NOAA National Climatic Data Center 9 October 2013

Drylands face potential threat under 2 C global warming target

CLIMATE SCENARIOS FOR ALBERTA

Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Met Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK.

The Netherlands approach for generating climate change scenarios

SEASONAL VARIABILITY AND PERSISTENCE IN TEMPERATURE SCENARIOS FOR ICELAND

The Victorian Climate Initiative: VicCI

Future precipitation in the Central Andes of Peru

Global climate model scenarios downscaled for Canada. David Price Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton CIF e-lecture, 14 March 2012

The 20th century warming and projections for the 21st century climate in the region of the Ukrainian Antarctic station Akademik Vernadsky

Table 13 Maximum dewpoint temperature (degrees Celsius), primary meteorological station, H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, 5/10/72 through 12/31/84

Oliver Elison Timm 1, Thomas W. Giambelluca 2, and Henry F. Diaz 3. Albany, Albany, New York, USA, Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA

A PROTOTYPE FOR THE APPLICATION OF CLIMATE INFORMATION TO IMPROVE HIGHWAY AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING IN THE COASTAL REGIONS OF LAKE VICTORIA

Introduction to Weather Data Cleaning

Key information and data that is available, and transparent protocols required, to support mainstreaming of climate change into planning processes

AERMOD Sensitivity to AERSURFACE Moisture Conditions and Temporal Resolution. Paper No Prepared By:

Climate Change Scenarios in Southern California. Robert J. Allen University of California, Riverside Department of Earth Sciences

An Update on Snowpack Projections for Alaska: Chugach Results. Jeremy Littell, USGS Alaska Climate Science Center

Appendix E. OURANOS Climate Change Summary Report

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION


Climate Change Impact on Drought Risk and Uncertainty in the Willamette River Basin

ClimateBC version history

Oxford (Cape Town) programme on the attribution of weather risk

Transcription:

TACCIMO Climate Report: Flathead National Forest 08-28-2013 Table of Contents Introduction Historic National Regional Forest Metadata and Interpretive Guidance Page 1 2 3 6 9 12 Introduction The TACCIMO climate report gives an organizational framework of geospatial climate forecast data necessary to evaluate the literature and planning report outputs. The climate projections in this report provide context for considering potential effects, management options, and their planning implications. This climate report v2.0 is a standalone version of what will become an integrated TACCIMO report feature in future versions. Considering differences among IPCC general circulation models (GCM) and emissions scenarios (SRES) is critical to understanding the full range of potential future climate anticipated for a given location. As such, the TACCIMO climate report is divided into three sections focusing on national, regional, and location specific trends in precipitation and temperature. Maps representing decadal averages* of precipitation and temperature are available through the GIS Viewer. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the GCMs and SRES available through TACCIMO. Strategies for selecting the appropriate GCMs and SRES are available in the User Guide, along with additional interpretive guidance. Table 1. Summary of GCM model groups, GCMs, and qualitative description Modeling Group GCM Description Canadian Centre for Climate Modeling & Analysis Wet and Cool Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research / Met Office UKMO- Hot US Dept of Commerce / NOAA / Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory GFDL- Dry and Warm Table 2. Summary of IPCC Scenarios, emission path, and description. Scenario Emissions Path Description SRES higher emissions path technological change and economic growth more fragmented; slower, higher population growth SRES middle emissions path technological change in the energy system balanced across all fossil and non-fossil energy sources, not relying too heavily on one particular energy source SRES lower emissions path rapid change in economic structures toward service and information; emphasis on clean, sustainable technology *Decadal averages were calculated from monthly averages of the five years before and after each referenced decade (e.g., 2010 decadal average is an average of monthly data from 2005 to 2014). Temperature is unaffected by reporting the monthly average, but precipitation values must be multiplied by 12 to obtain an annual average. page 1

Historic Figure 1 shows long-term historic averages for monthly precipitation and temperature. Monthly PRISM data from 1970 to 2000 were averaged to estimate the historic baseline, and the national averages for both variables are presented below the maps. Historic Monthly Precipitation (mm) 65.8 mm Historic Monthly Temperature (C) 11.0 C 0-50 -7-0 50-100 0-6 100-150 6-12 150-200 200-250 12-18 250-300 18-24 300-400 24-30 400-500 500-610 Precipitation (mm/mo) Temperature (C) Figure 1. Historic precipitation and temperature (based on PRISM climate data, averaged from 1970 to 2000) page 2

National: United States Tables 3 and 4 present the projected national average precipitation and temperature among the GCMs and IPCC SRES for the period spanning 2009 to 2099. Green and yellow cells indicate the maximum and minimum precipitation projections. Red and blue cells indicate the maximum and minimum temperature projections. These maximum and minimum projections are shown in Figures 2 and 3 as decadal averages, which were calculated using monthly averages of the five years before and after each reference decade (e.g., 2010 is an average of monthly data from 2005 to 2014). Note that different GCM-SRES combinations may represent the driest / wettest or hottest / coolest projections at different spatial scales. Table 3. 71.0 National average precipitation by GCM and SRES (mm, monthly average spanning 2009-2099, multiply by 12 to get annual total) SRES/GCM 69.3 69.1 67.5 68.6 62.1 62.9 64.3 63.1 63.9 66.4 65.2 65.2 69.0 67.0 PRISM Historic 1970-2000 = 65.8 65.0 63.0 61.0 59.0 57.0 55.0 53.0 51.0 49.0 Table 4. 14.5 National average temperature by GCM and SRES (C, monthly average spanning 2009-2099) SRES/GCM 13.0 12.8 12.4 13.3 13.3 12.5 13.3 13.5 12.9 14.0 13.5 13.0 12.5 12.0 11.5 12.7 13 13.2 PRISM Historic 1970-2000 = 11.0 11.0 10.5 10.0 page 3

Projected Precipitation (mm) Year Driest: CM2 Wettest: CGCM3 2010 : 62.5 Range: 2.4-432.2 : 66.4 Range: 2.6-475.0 : 65.6 Range: 3.0-473.1 : 67.6 Range: 2.7-524.7 : 57.4 Range: 2.0-457.4 : 73.5 Range: 1.8-610.5 0-50 50-100 100-150 150-200 200-250 250-300 300-400 2050 400-500 500-610 Precipitation (mm/mo) 2090 Figure 2.National scale decadal precipitation projections for driest and wettest GCM-SRES combinations page 4

Projected Temperature (C) Year Hottest: HadCM3 Coolest: CGCM3 2010 : 12.0 Range: -6.3-25.2 : 11.9 Range: -6.1-25.3 : 13.9 Range: -4.2-27.3 : 12.6 Range: -5.4-26.2 : 15.5 Range: -2.8-28.6 : 13.2 Range: -4.9-26.9-7 - 0 0-6 6-12 12-18 2050 18-24 24-30 Temperature (C) 2090 Figure 3.National scale decadal temperature projections for hottest and coolest GCM-SRES combinations page 5

Regional: Northern Region Tables 5 and 6 present the projected regional average precipitation and temperature among the GCMs and IPCC SRES for the period spanning 2009 to 2099. Green and yellow cells indicate the maximum and minimum precipitation projections. Red and blue cells indicate the maximum and minimum temperature projections. These maximum and minimum projections are shown in Figures 4 and 5 as decadal averages, which were calculated using monthly averages of the five years before and after each reference decade (e.g., 2010 is an average of monthly data from 2005 to 2014). Note that different GCM-SRES combinations may represent the driest / wettest or hottest / coolest projections at different spatial scales. Table 5. 53.0 Regional average precipitation by GCM and SRES (mm, monthly average spanning 2009-2099, multiply by 12 to get annual total) SRES/GCM 51.7 51.4 48.6 50.6 42.8 44.2 44.9 44 45.8 46.8 46.6 46.4 51.0 49.0 47.0 45.0 PRISM Historic 1970-2000 = 43.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 37.0 35.0 33.0 31.0 Table 6. 7.1 7.3 6.9 7.4 6.7 6.5 7.3 7.7 7.0 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 PRISM Historic 1970-2000 = 5.4 5.5 8.5 Regional average temperature by GCM and SRES (C, monthly average spanning 2009-2099) SRES/GCM 6.9 7.1 7.3 5.0 4.5 4.0 page 6

Projected Precipitation (mm) Year Driest: CM2 Wettest: CGCM3 2010 : 42.9 Range: 10.9-176.4 : 43.8 Range: 11.3-180.9 : 45.7 Range: 12.2-179.6 : 51.9 Range: 14.7-225.8 : 40.8 Range: 9.8-170.4 : 61.3 Range: 17.3-273.0 0-50 50-100 100-150 150-200 200-250 250-300 300-400 2050 400-500 500-610 Precipitation (mm/mo) 2090 Figure 4.Regional scale decadal precipitation projections for driest and wettest GCM-SRES combinations page 7

Projected Temperature (C) Year Hottest: HadCM3 Coolest: CM2 2010 : 6.1 Range: -2.9-12.2 : 5.8 Range: -3.0-11.5 : 8.2 Range: -0.7-14.3 : 7.2 Range: -1.6-13.0 : 9.8 Range: 0.8-16.0 : 7.2 Range: -1.5-13.2-7 - 0 0-6 6-12 12-18 2050 18-24 24-30 Temperature (C) 2090 Figure 5.Regional scale decadal temperature projections for hottest and coolest GCM-SRES combinations page 8

Forest: Flathead National Forest Tables 7 and 8 present the projected forest average precipitation and temperature among the GCMs and IPCC SRES for the period spanning 2009 to 2099. Green and yellow cells indicate the maximum and minimum precipitation projections. Red and blue cells indicate the maximum and minimum temperature projections. These maximum and minimum projections are shown in Figures 6 and 7 as decadal averages, which were calculated using monthly averages of the five years before and after each reference decade (e.g., 2010 is an average of monthly data from 2005 to 2014). Note that different GCM-SRES combinations may represent the driest / wettest or hottest / coolest projections at different spatial scales. Table 7. 111.0 Forest average precipitation by GCM and SRES (mm, monthly average spanning 2009-2099, multiply by 12 to get annual total) SRES/GCM 109.1 108.0 101.7 106.3 87.7 90.3 93.3 90.4 97.7 99.6 98.2 98.5 109.0 107.0 105.0 103.0 101.0 99.0 97.0 95.0 93.0 PRISM Historic 1970-2000 = 90.6 91.0 89.0 Table 8. 4.5 4.6 4.4 4.6 4.0 3.8 4.6 5.0 4.4 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 6.5 Forest average temperature by GCM and SRES (C, monthly average spanning 2009-2099) SRES/GCM 4.3 4.3 4.7 PRISM Historic 1970-2000 = 3.2 3.0 2.5 2.0 page 9

Projected Precipitation (mm) Year Driest: CM2 Wettest: CGCM3 2010 : 91.1 Range: 40.6-143.0 : 91.6 Range: 41.2-142.8 : 91.0 Range: 40.1-143.0 : 110.4 Range: 49.6-172.7 : 84.1 Range: 34.9-135.8 : 132.2 Range: 59.2-217.2 0-50 50-100 100-150 150-200 200-250 250-300 300-400 2050 400-500 500-610 Precipitation (mm/mo) 2090 Figure 6.Forest scale decadal precipitation projections for driest and wettest GCM-SRES combinations page 10

Projected Temperature (C) Year Hottest: HadCM3 Coolest: CM2 2010 : 3.4 Range: 0.5-8.0 : 3.0 Range: 0.2-7.5 : 5.5 Range: 2.3-10.0 : 4.5 Range: 1.7-9.0 : 7.2 Range: 4.0-11.7 : 4.7 Range: 1.8-9.2-7 - 0 0-6 6-12 12-18 2050 18-24 24-30 Temperature (C) 2090 Figure 7.Forest scale decadal temperature projections for hottest and coolest GCM-SRES combinations page 11

Metadata and Interpretive Guidance Historic climate data were derived from data provided by the PRISM Modeling Group at Oregon State University. Parameter-elevation regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) data have spatial resolution of 4 km, spatial extent of the conterminous US, temporal resolution of month, and temporal extent of 1895-1997. Data are described in detail in W.P. Gibson, C. Daly, T. Kittel, D. Nychka, C. Johns, N. Rosenbloom, A. McNab, and G. Taylor. 2002. Development of a 103-year high-resolution climate data set for the conterminous United States. In: Proceedings, 13th AMS Conference on Applied Climatology, American Meteorological Society, Portland, OR, May 13-16, 181-183. Data are available at http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu/products/. Climate prediction data (IPCC GCMs) were derived from data provided by the World Climate Research Programme's Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) dataset. These downscaled data have spatial resolution of 12 km, spatial extent of the conterminous US, temporal resolution of month, and temporal extent of 2001-2099. E.P. Maurer, L. Brekke, T. Pruitt, and P.B. Duffy. 2007. Fine-resolution climate projections enhance regional climate change impact studies. Eos Trans AGU 88(47): 540. Data are available at http://gdo-dcp.ucllnl.org/downscaled_cmip_projections/dcpinterface.html. For additional metadata, please see the Metadata-Overview and Metadata-Details links on the TACCIMO GIS Viewer. Guidelines and other background information necessary for the responsible use of TACCIMO are fully documented in the User Guide. The section entitled Interpreting Results provides a detailed explanation of the purpose, strengths, limitations, and intended applications of the provided information. The section entitled Content Production System fully explains methods and criteria for the inclusion of content in TACCIMO. Fully understanding these dimensions of TACCIMO is essential to the proper application of its information. It is critical that users apply the results within a broader science assessment process that is part of a larger decision support framework. The exact form of this process will vary with the scale and nature of the planning or management activity in question, but the bottom line is that TACCIMO is an initial supplement to a more involved decision support process and not a substitute for it. This geospatial information was prepared by the USDA Forest Service. These data were been developed from sources of differing accuracy, based on modeling or interpretation, accurate only at certain scales, or incomplete while being created or revised. The Forest Service cannot assure the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of this information for any particular purpose. Using geospatial data for purposes other than those for which they were created may yield inaccurate or misleading results. The Forest Service is not liable for any activity involving this information with respect to losses or damages. page 12 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)