Fourth Generation Shufang Su U. of Arizona S. Su In collaboration with J. Alwall, J.L. Feng, J. Kumar ariv: 02.3366; 3.xxxx.
Not the usual 4th generation... t t q q S. Su
Direct searches m b > 372 GeV m t > 335 GeV S. Su Daniel Whiteson, LHC West Coast Meeting @ Irvine
LHC 3/pb (ICHEP20) Just saw top. ~No sensitivity to t,b 40/pb (Moriond20) t Wq l+jets ~350 GeV t Wq dileptons ~300 GeV b Wt ss dileptons ~350 GeV S. Su 500/pb+ (LP20?) Up to 500 GeV+? Daniel Whiteson, LHC West Coast Meeting @ Irvine
b and t If m t > m b q t t q b S. Su Flacco, DW, BarShalom & Tait arvix: 05.77, PRL 20 Daniel Whiteson, LHC West Coast Meeting @ Irvine
Exotic 4th Generation Mirror Quarks S. Su
Exotic 4th Generation Mirror Quarks chiral under SM gauge group S. Su
Exotic 4th Generation Mirror Quarks chiral under SM gauge group same charge opposite chirality S. Su
Exotic 4th Generation Mirror Quarks chiral under SM gauge group charge under hidden symmetry same charge opposite chirality S. Su
New after LHC West Coast @ Irvine B B study @ Tevatron and LHC T T results from CDF S. Su
Outline Motivation: general / specific WIMPless model Constraints Simulations and cut analysis Exclusion and discovery reach Conclusion S. Su 8
Dark matter motivation: general Dark Matter: longlived on cosmological time scale Charge under a new unbroken symmetry absolutely stable have only gravitational interaction with the SM can not be discovered at colliders couple to SM through connector Y YY production with y f Y f DM connector SM S. Su 9
Dark matter motivation: general Dark Matter: longlived on cosmological time scale Charge under a new unbroken symmetry absolutely stable have only gravitational interaction with the SM can not be discovered at colliders couple to SM through connector Y YY production with y f Y f DM connector SM SM charge & dark charge S. Su 9
Dark matter motivation: general Dark Matter: longlived on cosmological time scale Charge under a new unbroken symmetry absolutely stable have only gravitational interaction with the SM can not be discovered at colliders couple to SM through connector Y YY production with y f Y f DM connector SM SM charge & dark charge SUSY neutralino squark quark Rparity ExD KK gauge boson KK quark quark KKparity Our study DM(no SM charge) exotic quark quark dark charge S. Su 9
WIMP miracle WIMP m WIMP m weak g g weak Ω h 2 0.3 naturally around the observed value S. Su
WIMP miracle WIMP m WIMP m weak g g weak Ω h 2 0.3 naturally around the observed value S. Su
WIMPless miracle Ω σv m2 g 4 only fixes one combination of dark matter mass and coupling m/g 2 ~ mweak/gweak 2, Ωh 2 ~ 0.3 could have m mweak as long as the relation holds WIMPless DM J.L. Feng and J. Kumar, PRL, 2330 (2008) J.L. Feng, H. Tu and H. Yu, JCAP 08, 043 (2008) J.L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat, H. Tu and H. Yu, JCAP 0907, 004 (2009) dark matter: no SM gauge interactions, not WIMP naturally obtain right relic density: similar to WIMP S. Su
WIMPless model J.L. Feng and J. Kumar, PRL, 2330 (2008) Dark matter is hidden no SM interactions DM sector has its own particle content, mass m, coupling g Connected to SUSY breaking sector m g 2 m g 2 F 6π 2 M Ω σv m2 g 4 right relic density! (irrespective of its mass) If no direct coupling to SM: interact only through gravity impact on structure formation no direct/indirect/collider signals S. Su 2
WIMPless: not hidden S. Su 3
WIMPless: not hidden my max (mweak, m) interaction λ Yf S. Su 3
WIMPless: not hidden my max (mweak, m) interaction λ Yf indirect detection ff, YY direct detection f f collider: 4th generation fermions S. Su 3
WIMPless: not hidden my max (mweak, m) interaction λ Yf indirect detection ff, YY direct detection f f open new possibility for DM model parameters new experimental search windows collider: 4th generation fermions S. Su 3
WIMPless: not hidden my max (mweak, m) interaction λ Yf indirect detection ff, YY direct detection f f light dark matter open new possibility for DM model parameters new experimental search windows collider: 4th generation fermions S. Su 3
ENON0 ENON0 (.7 live days) ENON 0: 05.265 Reply to the Comments on the ENON0 First Dark Matter Results. Heated debate goes on and on and on... Collar and Mckinsey: 05.3723 Response to ariv:05.265 S. Su 4
Dark matter motivation: specific light DM with large SI not generic in typical WIMP SI : chirality flip, proportional to Yukawa coupling A. Bottino, F. Donato, N. Fornengo and S. Scopel, PRD 68, 043506 (2003); PRD 77, 05002 (2008); PRD 78, 083520 (2008). can be easily accommodated in WIMPless model with connector Y J.L. Feng, J. Kumar and L.E. Strigari, PLB 670, 37 (2008) S. Su 5
Explaining DAMA: WIMPless WIMPless model (discrete symmetry) V = λ Q Lq L + B Rb R + T Rt R Q L : T R : B R : 3, 2, 6 3,, 2 3 3,, 3. scattering: q Q q, q=b,t, induce coupling to gluon at loop M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. B 78, 443 (978). Q q q g q S. Su 6 g
Explaining DAMA: WIMPless WIMPless model (discrete symmetry) V = λ Q Lq L + B Rb R + T Rt R not chirality opposite chirality of SM quark Q L : T R : B R : 3, 2, 6 3,, 2 3 3,, 3. scattering: q Q q, q=b,t, induce coupling to gluon at loop M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. B 78, 443 (978). Q q q g q S. Su 6 g
Explaining DAMA: WIMPless WIMPless model (discrete symmetry) V = λ Q Lq L + B Rb R + T Rt R not chirality opposite chirality of SM quark Q L : T R : B R : 3, 2, 6 3,, 2 3 3,, 3. Exotic 4thgeneration mirror quarks scattering: q Q q, q=b,t, induce coupling to gluon at loop M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. B 78, 443 (978). Q q q g q S. Su 6 g
Explaining DAMA: WIMPless WIMPless model m ~ GeV, mq ~300500 GeV, λ ~ 0.3, σsi in right range J.L. Feng, J. Kumar and L.E. Strigari, PLB 670, 37 (2008) Q couples to b S. Su 7
3rd generation vs. the first two first two generations, tree level scattering λ ~ 0.03 Q q q third generation loop level scattering, λ ~ 0.3, more natural less constrained by FCNC S. Su 8
Collider Signature: exotic quarks Y particle appears as exotic 4th generation mirror quarks Q p Qʼ DM q DM Collider Signal T T tt, B B bb p Qʼ q differ from SUSY searches: cascade decay differ from usual 4th generation quark T Wb, B Wt appears in a general set of new physics scenarios asymmetric dark matter little Higgs with Tparity B. Dutta and J. Kumar, ariv: 2.34 baryon and lepton number as gauge symmetry... H.C. Cheng and I. Low, JHEP 0408, 06 (2004) P. Fileviez Perez and M. B. Wise, ariv: 02.754 S. Su 9
Constraints perturbativity constraints: mq = yq v, mq 600 GeV precision electroweak data: mt mb ~ 50 GeV direct searches limits B B bb, similar to sbottom pair production with b b χ 0 (pb) 2 "! B D0, L=5.2 fb (a) D0 LQ NLO cross section, B%BF(LQ $b# )= LQ NLO cross section, B= 0.5!F 50 200 250 300 Leptoquark Mass (GeV) 3 Observed limits Expected limits sp 0 0 50 0 50 200 250 Bottom Squark Mass (GeV) S. Su 20 V. M. Abazov et al. [D0 Collaboration], 05.2222 Neutralino Mass (GeV) 20 0 80 60 40 20 D0, L=5.2 fb (b) m b ~ Observed Expected = m b + m & ' 0 LEP s=208 GeV D0 Run I 92 pb CDF Run I 88 pb D0 Run II 5.2 fb CDF Run II 295 pb D0 Run II 3 pb msb>247 GeV (95% C.L.)
Constraints perturbativity constraints: mq = yq v, mq 600 GeV precision electroweak data: mt mb ~ 50 GeV direct searches limits B B bb, similar to sbottom pair production with b b χ 0 (pb) 2 "! B D0, L=5.2 fb (a) D0 LQ NLO cross section, B%BF(LQ $b# )= LQ NLO cross section, B= 0.5!F 50 200 250 300 Leptoquark Mass (GeV) 3 Observed limits Expected limits msb > 247 GeV sp 0 0 50 0 50 200 250 Bottom Squark Mass (GeV) S. Su 20 V. M. Abazov et al. [D0 Collaboration], 05.2222 Neutralino Mass (GeV) 20 0 80 CDF mb 60 > 365 (440) GeV 40 20 D0, L=5.2 fb (b) m b ~ Observed Expected = m b + m & ' 0 LEP s=208 GeV D0 Run I 92 pb CDF Run I 88 pb D0 Run II 5.2 fb Run II 295 pb D0 Run II 3 pb msb>247 GeV (95% C.L.)
Constraints B B bb, similar to sbottom pair production with b b χ 0 20 0 CDF M~ b < M "! 0 + M b Observed Limit (95% C.L.) Expected Limit (95% C.L.) CDF D0 CDF (2650 pb ) (3 pb ) (295 pb.... ).. ] 2 [GeV/c M! "0 80 60 40 msb>230 GeV (95% C.L.) 20 o LEP # = 0 0 0 50 0 50 200 250 S. Su 2 2 M~ T. Aaltonen et al. [CDF Collaboration], 05.2600 b [GeV/c ]
Constraints: direct search CDF, Run II, 2.5 fb, gluino pair production, g b b b b χ 0 two or more jets, large MET, 2btagging T. Aaltonen et al. [CDF Collaboration], PRL 2, 2280 (2009). Cross Section [pb] 2 CDF Run II (2.5 fb ) pp ~ g ~ g at 2 95% CL limit (m[b ~ ]=250 GeV/c ) Expected limit 2 95% CL limit (m[b ~ ]=300 GeV/c ) Expected limit ~ g ~ s=.96 GeV b b ~ bb (0% BR) PROSPINO NLO (CTEQ6M) µ = µ = m( ~ g) R F ~ 2 0 2 m( q)=500 GeV/c m( )=60 GeV/c 250 300 350 400 0 (0% BR) 2 m( ~ g) [GeV/c ] 200 250 300 350 400 S. Su 22 ] 2 Sbottom Mass [GeV/c 350 CDF Run II (2.5 fb ) 300 250 200 50 0 95% CL limit Expected limit g ~ bb ~ kinematically forbidden CDF Run II 56 pb Excluded Region CDF Run I excluded ~ ~ g bb (0% BR) ~ 0 b b (0% BR) 0 2 m( ) = 60 GeV/c 2 m( ~ q) = 500 GeV/c D0 Run II 3 pb Sbottom Pair Production Excluded Region 2 Gluino Mass [GeV/c ]
Constraints: direct search CDF, Run II, 2.5 fb, gluino pair production, g b b b b χ 0 two or more jets, large MET, 2btagging T. Aaltonen et al. [CDF Collaboration], PRL 2, 2280 (2009). Cross Section [pb] 2 CDF Run II (2.5 fb ) 200 250 300 350 400 S. Su 22 ] 2 Sbottom Mass [GeV/c 350 CDF Run II (2.5 fb ) ~ ~ g bb (0% BR) ~ mgluino > 340 GeV 250 m( ~ for 0 Δm ~ 20 GeV mb > 370 GeV pp ~ g ~ g at 2 95% CL limit (m[b ~ ]=250 GeV/c ) Expected limit 2 95% CL limit (m[b ~ ]=300 GeV/c ) Expected limit s=.96 GeV b b PROSPINO NLO (CTEQ6M) µ = µ = m( ~ g) R F ~ 2 0 2 m( q)=500 GeV/c m( )=60 GeV/c (0% BR) 250 300 350 400 2 m( ~ g) [GeV/c ] 300 200 50 0 95% CL limit Expected limit g ~ bb ~ kinematically forbidden CDF Run II 56 pb Excluded Region m( CDF Run I excluded ~ ~ g bb (0% BR) ~ 0 b b (0% BR) 2 ) = 60 GeV/c 2 Gluino Mass [GeV/c ] 0 q) = 500 GeV/c D0 Run II 3 pb Sbottom Pair Production Excluded Region 2
Constraints: direct search CDF, Run II, 2.7 fb, stop pair production, t b χ ± b χ0 lν mst > 50 85 GeV, weaker than sbottom limit 2 ) GeV/c 0 M(! " CDF Run II Preliminary (2.7 fb 85 ± 2 M(! " )=5.8 GeV/c 2 ± 0 ~ ± 80 BR( t! " BR (! " #! " $l)=.0 # b)= 75 70 65 60 55 2 ± 0 BR (! " #! " $l)=0.50 2 #! " 0 (! " ± BR $l)=0.25 Observed 95% CL ) 2 ) GeV/c 0 M(! " 2 ± 0 CDF Run II Preliminary (2.7 fb ) BR (! " #! " $l)=.0 85 ± 2 M(! " )=25.8 GeV/c ~ ± 80 BR( t! " # b)= 75 70 65 60 55 2 #! " 0 (! " ± BR $l)=0.50 Observed 95% CL 2 #! " 0 (! " ± BR $l)=0.25 50 45 Excluded by LEP 20 30 40 ~ 50 60 70 80 2 M( t ) GeV/c 50 Excluded by LEP 45 35 40 45 50 55 ~ 60 65 70 75 80 85 2 M( t ) GeV/c A. G. Ivanov [CDF Collaboration], ariv:08.0788 [hepex]. S. Su 23
Simulation MadGraph Pythia PGS Signal: T T t ( ) t ( ) bw + bw hadronic channel: large cross section SM backgrounds, tt, W, have MET with lepton irreducible background: Z νν + jets semileptonic channel: isolated lepton, suppress QCD background purely leptonic channel: suppressed cross section Similar analyses in the literature semileptonic mode, high mass, large luminosity T. Han, R. Mahbubani, D. G. E. Walker and L. T. E. Wang, JHEP 0905, 7 (2009) hadronic mode, spin and mass determination P. Meade and M. Reece, Phys. Rev. D 74, 050 (2006). S. Su 24
Simulation MadGraph Pythia PGS Signal: T T t ( ) t ( ) bw + bw hadronic channel: large cross section SM backgrounds, tt, W, have MET with lepton irreducible background: Z νν + jets semileptonic channel: isolated lepton, suppress QCD background purely leptonic channel: suppressed cross section Similar analyses in the literature semileptonic mode, high mass, large luminosity T. Han, R. Mahbubani, D. G. E. Walker and L. T. E. Wang, JHEP 0905, 7 (2009) hadronic mode, spin and mass determination P. Meade and M. Reece, Phys. Rev. D 74, 050 (2006). S. Su 24
Simulation MadGraph Pythia PGS Signal: T T t ( ) t ( ) bw + bw hadronic channel: large cross section SM backgrounds, tt, W, have MET with lepton irreducible background: Z νν + jets semileptonic channel: isolated lepton, suppress QCD background purely leptonic channel: suppressed cross section Similar analyses in the literature semileptonic mode, high mass, large luminosity T. Han, R. Mahbubani, D. G. E. Walker and L. T. E. Wang, JHEP 0905, 7 (2009) hadronic mode, spin and mass determination P. Meade and M. Reece, Phys. Rev. D 74, 050 (2006). S. Su 24
Semileptonic channel: precuts Signal:T T tt bbjj l + MET Precuts one isolated electron or muon large MET large mt W m W T m T (p l T, p T ) = 2 p l T p T cos( φ(p l T, p T )) Cross section / bin (pb) LHC,m =300,,m =400,,m =500, W+jets tt (2e/µ) tt ( ) tt (e/µ) Cross section / bin (pb) LHC,m =300,,m =400,,m =500, W+jets tt (2e/µ) tt ( ) tt (e/µ) 2 2 3 0 0 200 300 400 500 Missing E (GeV) T S. Su 25 0 50 0 50 200 250 300 350 400 W (GeV) M T
Semileptonic channel: precuts Signal:T T tt bbjj l + MET Precuts one isolated electron or muon large MET large mt W m W T m T (p l T, p T ) = 2 p l T p T cos( φ(p l T, p T )) Cross section / bin (pb) LHC,m =300,,m =400,,m =500, W+jets tt (2e/µ) tt ( ) tt (e/µ) Cross section / bin (pb) SM bg peak around mw LHC,m =300,,m =400,,m =500, W+jets tt (2e/µ) tt ( ) tt (e/µ) 2 2 3 0 0 200 300 400 500 Missing E (GeV) T S. Su 25 0 50 0 50 200 250 300 350 400 W (GeV) M T
Semileptonic channel: precuts Njet 4 Cross section / bin (pb) 2 3 LHC,m =300,,m =400,,m =500, W+jets tt (2e/µ) tt ( ) tt (e/µ) 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 N(jets) Cross section / bin (pb) 2 second, hadronically decay W LHC,m =300,,m =400,,m =500, W+jets tt (2e/µ) tt ( ) tt (e/µ) 3 60 80 0 20 40 60 80 (GeV) S. Su 26 m jj
Semileptonic channel: Tevatron Additional cuts: MET, mt W, HT he partonlevel generation. Tevatron: semileptonic Cut T (300) T (400) T (500) t t W +jets No cut 203.2 6.33. 569 (579) µ/e, noτ 36. 2.88 0.94 4 (2060) /E T > 0 GeV 7.7 2.00 0.57 7.2 (728.8) m W T > 0 GeV.7.38 0.4 22.6 (36.62) 4jets 4.8 0.64 0.062 2.6 0.30 m jj m W < GeV 4.3 0.5 0.049 2.2 0.9 All precuts 4.3 0.5 0.049 2.9 0.9 m W T > 50 GeV.93 0.325 0.036 0.62 0.035 /E T > 50 GeV.75 0.367 0.04 0.28 0.035 H T > 300 GeV.93 0.353 0.042.8 0.07 /E T > 50, H T > 300.04 0.279 0.037 0.056 0.07 2.4 fb S. Su 27
Semileptonic channel: LHC Additional cuts: MET, mt W, HT Cut LHC: semileptonic T (300) T (400) T (500) t t ( e/µ) t t ( τ) t t (2 e/µ) W +jets No cut 4.89 3.6 0.922 66.67 43.96.62 (42.28) µ/e, noτ 3.2 0.669 0.93 36.45 8.5 3.8 (5.74) /E T > 0 GeV.92 0.52 0.65 5.05 2.07 0.888 (.33) m W T > 0 GeV. 0.342 0.6 0.34 0.638 0.47 (0.235) 4jets 0.357 0.6 0.043 0.056 0.09 0.062 0.028 m jj m W < GeV 0.65 0.049 0.06 0.026 0.03 0.04 0.0 All precuts 0.65 0.049 0.06 0.027 0.03 0.04 0.0 Additional m W T cut: mw T > 50, 200 GeV Additional E T cuts: E T > 50, 200, 250 GeV. H T = 4 i= pj T i + p l T cuts: H T > 400, 500 GeV. Combinations of the cuts above. 82 fb S. Su 28
Hadronic channel: precuts Signal: T T tt bbjjjj + MET Precuts Background: leptonic W decay with lepton missed tau lepton mistagged as jets Z νν + jets Cross section / bin (pb) Cross section / bin (pb) No isolated electron, muon, tautagged jets large MET LHC,m =300, m T,m =300, m T,m =400,,m =400, m T m,m T,m =500, =500, Z+jets Z+jets W+jets W+jets tt (hadronic) tt (hadronic) tt (e/µ) tt (e/µ) tt (!) tt (!) Cross section / bin (pb) Njet 5 LHC,m =300,,m =400,,m =500, Z+jets W+jets tt (e/µ) tt (!) 2 2 S. Su 29 0 0 0 0 200 200 300 300 400 400 500 500 Missing Missing E (GeV) E (GeV) T T 2 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 N(jets),m =300, m T,m =300, m,m =400, m,m =400,
Hadronic channel: precuts φ(/p T,p j T ) o reduce the suppress QCD bg Cross section / bin (pb) 2 3 after Precuts LHC,m =300,,m =400,,m =500, Z+jets W+jets tt (e/µ) tt ( ) Cross section / bin (fb) after Precuts LHC,m =300,,m =400,,m =500, Z+jets W+jets tt (e/µ) tt ( ) 2 0 50 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 Missing E (GeV) (after precuts) T S. Su 30 200 400 600 800 00 200 400 (GeV) (after precuts) H T
Hadronic channel: precuts Cross section / bin (pb) 2 3 φ(/p T,p j T ) o reduce the after Precuts suppress QCD bg LHC,m =300,,m =400,,m =500, Z+jets W+jets tt (e/µ) tt ( ) Cross section / bin (fb) tau background: important for new physics with jets and MET. after Precuts LHC,m =300,,m =400,,m =500, Z+jets W+jets tt (e/µ) tt ( ) 2 0 50 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 Missing E (GeV) (after precuts) T S. Su 30 200 400 600 800 00 200 400 (GeV) (after precuts) H T
Hadronic channel: Tevatron Additional cuts: MET, HT, Njet n the partonlevel generation. Tevatron: hadronic Cut T (300) T (400) T (500) t t W +jets Z+jets No cut 203.24 6.33. 569. (579.06) (3030.09) 0isolatedleptons 82.88 6.97 0.499 2265.54 (756.96) (2545.2) /E T > 0 GeV 42.86 5.28 0.422 25.93 (663.5) (29.22) 5jets 22.64 3.07 0.273 22. 3.3 2.6 φ cuts 9.0 2.74 0.245 5.8 2.8 2.2 All precuts 9 2.74 0.245 5.8 2.8 2.2 2 fb Additional E T cuts: E T > 50, 200, 250 GeV. H T = 5 i= pj T i cuts: H T > 300, 350, 400 GeV. At least 6 jets with p j T > 20 GeV. Combinations of the cuts above. S. Su 3
Hadronic channel: LHC Additional cuts: MET, HT, Njet in pb. Cut LHC: hadronic T (300) T (400) T (500) t t ( τ) t t ( e/µ) t t (had) W +jets Z+jets No cut 4.89 3.6 0.922 43.96 66.67 4.59 (42.28) (8.86) 0isolatedleptons 6.75.5 0.45 6.88 3. 72.29 (6.8) (5.7) /E T > 0 GeV 4.5.2 0.394 3.9 2.67 0.097 (.25) (.48) 5jets.34 0.406 0.35 0.664 0.47 0.03 0.305 0.22 φ cuts.9 0.374 0.25 0.56 0.4 0.0 0.265 0.87 All precuts.9 0.374 0.25 0.56 0.4 0.0 0.265 0.87 Additional E T cuts: E T > 50, 200, 250, 300 GeV. H T = 5 i= pj T i cuts: H T > 400, 500 GeV. At least 6 jets with p j T > 40 GeV. Combinations of the cuts above..4 pb S. Su 32
Tevatron exclusion optimal cuts (after precuts) S/B > 0., more than 2 events Poisson statistics (GeV) m Exclusion for T T! t t at the Tevatron 200 80 60 40 20 0 80 60 2 fb fb 5 fb = m + m t 20 fb Semileptonic channel (GeV) m Exclusion for T T! t t at the Tevatron 200 80 60 40 20 0 80 60 2 fb = m + m t 20 fb fb 5 fb Hadronic channel 40 40 20 20 95% C.L. 95% C.L. S. Su 0 33 0 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 (GeV) 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 (GeV)
Tevatron exclusion optimal cuts (after precuts) S/B > 0., more than 2 events Poisson statistics soft decay products (GeV) m Exclusion for T T! t t at the Tevatron 200 80 60 40 20 0 80 60 2 fb fb 5 fb = m + m t 20 fb Semileptonic channel (GeV) m Exclusion for T T! t t at the Tevatron 200 80 60 40 20 0 80 60 2 fb = m + m t 20 fb fb 5 fb Hadronic channel 40 40 20 20 95% C.L. 95% C.L. S. Su 0 33 0 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 (GeV) 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 (GeV)
Tevatron Searches (CDF) Search for Production of Heavy Particles Decaying to Top Quarks and Invisible Particles in p p collisions at s =.96 TeV ] 2 [ GeV/c m 0 80 60 40 20 T. Aaltonen et al. [CDF Collaboration], ariv:3.2482 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 2 [ GeV/c S. Su 34 Expected exclusion Observed exclusion m t = m Semileptonic 4.8 fb 95% C.L. ] 3 2 Cross section upper limit [fb] [] J. [2] J. [3] H [a [4] P. ph [5] M W [6] D 7 [7] A Le la [8] C ax pr p T [9] F.
LHC exclusion (GeV) m Exclusion for T T! t t 250 200 50 mt = m + m t at TeV LHC Semileptonic channel 300 pb 200 pb (GeV) m Exclusion for T T! t t 250 200 50 mt = m + m t at TeV LHC Hadronic channel 0 pb 300 pb 200 pb 0 0 pb 0 50 50 0 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 95% C.L. 95% C.L. 0 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 (GeV) (GeV) S. Su 35
LHC exclusion offshell top (GeV) m Exclusion for T T! t t 250 200 50 mt = m + m t at TeV LHC Semileptonic channel 300 pb 200 pb (GeV) m Exclusion for T T! t t 250 200 50 mt = m + m t at TeV LHC Hadronic channel 0 pb 300 pb 200 pb 0 0 pb 0 50 50 0 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 95% C.L. 95% C.L. 0 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 (GeV) (GeV) S. Su 35
Tevatron discovery (GeV) m Discovery of T T! t t at the Tevatron 200 80 60 Semileptonic channel = m + m t (GeV) m Discovery of T T! t t at the Tevatron 200 80 60 Hadronic channel = m + m t 40 40 20 0 80 60 40 5 fb fb 20 fb 20 0 80 60 40 2 fb 5 fb fb 20 fb 20 3 σ 20 3 σ 0 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 0 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 (GeV) (GeV) S. Su 36
LHC discovery (GeV) m Discovery for T T! t t at TeV LHC 200 80 60 40 Semileptonic channel = m + m t (GeV) m Discovery for T T! t t 200 80 60 40 = m + m t at TeV LHC Hadronic channel 300 pb 20 0 300 pb 20 0 200 pb 80 200 pb 80 0 pb 60 40 0 pb 60 40 20 0 0 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 (GeV) (GeV) LHC @7TeV, multiply lumonisity by a factor of 3. S. Su 37 20 3 σ 3 σ
Tevatron Search Signal: B B bb Bg: W(lν)jj, Z(νν) jj,wz, ttbar Precuts no lepton 2 or 3 jets, with ηj <2.5, PTj > 20 GeV αjj2 < 64 o MET 40 GeV, MET/GeV > 80 40Δϕmin (MET, jets) 2 bjets, including leading jet Δϕ(MET, jets) > 0.6, A=(METMHT)/(MET+MHT), 0. < A < 0.2 jj = (PTj+PTj2)/HT, jj > 0.75 HT > 60 GeV Additional cuts PTj, MET, jj, HT S. Su 38
Tevatron Reach Preliminery results for B B bb optimal cuts (after precuts) S/B > 0., more than 2 events Poisson statistics 300 300 m (GeV) 250 200 50 0 50 5 fb PRELIMENARY fb 0 300 350 400 450 500 mb (GeV) m (GeV) 250 200 50 0 50 5 fb fb PRELIMENARY 20 fb 95% C.L. 3 σ 20 fb 0 300 350 400 450 500 mb (GeV) S. Su 39
LHC7 Search Signal: B B bb Bg: W(lν)jj, Z(νν) jj,wz, ttbar Precuts no lepton 2 or 3 jets, with ηj <2.5, PTj > 0, 40 (40) GeV MET 80 GeV f=met/meff, f>0.3 for 2 jets, f>0.25 for 3 jets Δϕ(MET, jets) > 0.2 Sphericity ST>0.2 bjets, including leading jet Additional cuts PTj, MET, Meff, additional btag S. Su 40
LHC Reach Preliminery results for B B bb 400 400 optimal cuts (after precuts) S/B > 0., more than 2 events Poisson statistics m (GeV) 350 300 250 200 50 PRELIMENARY m (GeV) 0 0 0. fb 0. fb 50 fb 50 fb 95% C.L. fb 3 σ fb 0 0 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 mb (GeV) mb (GeV) 350 300 250 200 50 PRELIMENARY S. Su 4
Conclusions Pair production of exotic quarks DM + SM particles DM motivated, WIMPless scenario natural obtain the right relic density explain DAMA results: light DM, large σsi T T t t semileptonic mode and hadronic mode Current CDF exclusion (4.8 fb ): 360 GeV Exclusion: LHC @ TeV, 300 pb Discovery: m<30 GeV, mt < 405 GeV for Tevatron 20 fb m<70 GeV, mt < 490 GeV for LHC 300 pb S. Su 42
Conclusions B B bb current exclusion (5.2 fb, D0): 440 GeV Tevatron 20 fb, exclusion, 470 GeV LHC @ 7 TeV, fb, discovery: 545 GeV identify signal as T T t t,comparing with SUSY Need ILC... complementary between collider studies and DM searches small λ, DM searches unsuccessful displaced vertex at collider t t t t χ 0 χ 0 S. Su 43