Why Models Need Standards Update on AgGateway Initiative

Similar documents
Application of the Integrated Aerobiology Modeling System to Soybean Rust Forecasting in 2006

Regional Variability in Crop Specific Synoptic Forecasts

NOAA s Climate Normals. Pre-release Webcast presented by NOAA s National Climatic Data Center June 13, 2011

Fusarium Head Blight (FHB)

2012 will likely be remembered for the significant cold injury damage that occurred to fruit during the spring season. Our scheduled first speaker

EVALUATION OF PEANUT DISEASE DEVELOPMENT FORECASTING. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

4/17/2015. Overview. Introduction to decision support systems. Introduction to decision support systems. Introduction to decision support systems

An assessment of the risk of aerial transport of rust pathogens to the Western Hemisphere and within North America

A Cotton Irrigator s Decision Support System Using National, Regional and Local Data

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2008

Remote Sensing Geographic Information Systems Global Positioning Systems

Impact on Agriculture

The role of climate normals in crop specific weather forecasts. Department of Geography, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA 2

SuperPack North America

Operational MRCC Tools Useful and Usable by the National Weather Service

The Colorado Climate Center at CSU. residents of the state through its threefold

Localized Aviation Model Output Statistics Program (LAMP): Improvements to convective forecasts in response to user feedback

Wheat disease forecasting using weather radar observations

An Online Platform for Sustainable Water Management for Ontario Sod Producers

Climate Change Impact on Air Temperature, Daily Temperature Range, Growing Degree Days, and Spring and Fall Frost Dates In Nebraska

Accuracy of cotton-planting forecasts assessed in the San Joaquin Valley

Guide to the Late Blight Decision Support System (DSS) For Potatoes and Tomatoes

Earth Networks ENcast 6- Day Hourly Lat- Lon Forecast Feed

Speedwell High Resolution WRF Forecasts. Application

MxVision WeatherSentry Web Services Content Guide

NOAA-EPA s s U.S. National Air Quality Forecast Capability

NYS Mesonet Data Access Policy

Monitoring: Spore Trapping. Presenter John Rupe

Monitoring Extreme Weather Events. February 8, 2010

AIRNow and AIRNow-Tech

SWAT WEATHER DATABASE TOOL

AREP GAW. AQ Forecasting

5B.1 DEVELOPING A REFERENCE CROP EVAPOTRANSPIRATION CLIMATOLOGY FOR THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES USING THE FAO PENMAN-MONTEITH ESTIMATION TECHNIQUE

Chesapeake Bay Remote Sensing Pilot Executive Briefing

AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION TOOLBOX. L. Albert Brower, Curtis L. Hartzell, and Steffen P.

Westmap: The Western Climate Mapping Initiative An Update

Operational Practices in South African Weather Service (SAWS)

WeatherHawk Weather Station Protocol

WeatherCloud Hyper-Local Global Forecasting All rights reserved. Fathym, Inc.

Agrometeorologists for farmers in hotter, drier, wetter future, 9-10 November 2016, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Importance of Numerical Weather Prediction in Variable Renewable Energy Forecast

Background and Assumptions

Weather versus Climate: What is the difference? Sources of Weather Information

SEASONAL CLIMATE OUTLOOK VALID FOR JULY-AUGUST- SEPTEMBER 2013 IN WEST AFRICA, CHAD AND CAMEROON

Crop / Weather Update

Plant Disease Prediction Using a Mesoscale Weat her Forecasting Technique

Using NEWA Resources in a Vineyard IPM Strategy. Tim Weigle and Juliet Carroll NYS IPM Program, Cornell Cooperative Extension

Development of Pakistan s New Area Weighted Rainfall Using Thiessen Polygon Method

Day of the Last Spring Freeze?

Workshop on Drought and Extreme Temperatures: Preparedness and Management for Sustainable Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery

AN INTERNATIONAL SOLAR IRRADIANCE DATA INGEST SYSTEM FOR FORECASTING SOLAR POWER AND AGRICULTURAL CROP YIELDS


Climate Information for Managing Risk. Victor Murphy NWS Southern Region Climate Service Program Mgr. June 12, 2008

Founding of a Grower-based Weather/Pest Information Network to Aid IPM Adoption

H2020-TWINN Guest lecture. 9May2018 Vienna, Austria

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Crop / Weather Update

Jon W. Zeitler* NOAA/NWS/Austin/San Antonio Weather Forecast Office, TX. Paul G. Witsaman NOAA/NWS/Southern Region Headquarters, Ft.

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2017

Using the EartH2Observe data portal to analyse drought indicators. Lesson 4: Using Python Notebook to access and process data

Nonlinear Temperature Effects of Dust Bowl Region and Short-Run Adaptation

Integrated Electricity Demand and Price Forecasting

Bangladesh Weather and Climate Services Regional Project (BWCSRP)

Application and verification of the ECMWF products Report 2007

Degree Days: Heating, Cooling, and Growing 1

USDA s Operational GIS & related processes for International Weather & Crop Assessements

Reclamation Perspective on Operational Snow Data and Needs. Snowpack Monitoring for Streamflow Forecasting and Drought Planning August 11, 2015

Agrometeorological activities in RHMSS

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2013

REQUIREMENTS FOR WEATHER RADAR DATA. Review of the current and likely future hydrological requirements for Weather Radar data

The North American Electric Reliability Corporation hereby submits Informational Filing of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Determination of Optimum Fixed and Adjustable Tilt Angles for Solar Collectors by Using Typical Meteorological Year data for Turkey

Use of Climate information in Disaster Risk Management in Zimbabwe

The Climate of Payne County

Crop / Weather Update

Title: NEWA (Network for Environment and Weather Awareness) 2006: A Year in Review

Memo. I. Executive Summary. II. ALERT Data Source. III. General System-Wide Reporting Summary. Date: January 26, 2009 To: From: Subject:

Seasonal Hydrological Forecasting in the Berg Water Management Area of South Africa

Gridded Spring Forecast Maps for Natural Resource Planning

Water information system advances American River basin. Roger Bales, Martha Conklin, Steve Glaser, Bob Rice & collaborators UC: SNRI & CITRIS

Prince Edward County Appellation 2015 Growing Season Summary

Speakers: NWS Buffalo Dan Kelly and Sarah Jamison, NERFC Jeane Wallace. NWS Flood Services for the Black River Basin

Minnesota s Runoff Risk Advisory Forecast

The Climate of Bryan County

The TexasET Network and Website User s Manual

REPRESENTING EUMETSAT S ACTIVE FIRE MONITORING PRODUCT BY GOOGLE EARTH OVER TURKEY

Agrometeorological network and information systems based on meteorological informations in Slovenia., Vlasta Knapič,

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions

Multivariate Regression Model Results

AERMOD Sensitivity to AERSURFACE Moisture Conditions and Temporal Resolution. Paper No Prepared By:

Understanding Weather and Climate Risk. Matthew Perry Sharing an Uncertain World Conference The Geological Society, 13 July 2017

Experimental MOS Precipitation Type Guidance from the ECMWF Model

Behind the Climate Prediction Center s Extended and Long Range Outlooks Mike Halpert, Deputy Director Climate Prediction Center / NCEP

Web GIS Based Disaster Portal Project ESRI INDIA

Evaluation of updated JXAM5 snow cover extent product using ground based snow depth information

Establishing Kansas as a Data Provider to the National Ground-water Monitoring Network

Robert Shedd Northeast River Forecast Center National Weather Service Taunton, Massachusetts, USA

Statement of indicative wholesale water charges and charges scheme

EAS 535 Laboratory Exercise Weather Station Setup and Verification

2018 Annual Review of Availability Assessment Hours

Transcription:

Why Models Need Standards Update on AgGateway Initiative Joe Russo, Jean Batzer, Mark Gleason and Roger Magarey Midwest Weather Working Group 6 th Annual Meeting Austin, Texas August 9, 2013

Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc. Information Technology (IT) Paradigm Hierarchy of Information Flow

Models/Data/Risk in Management Decision Making Data Viewing In Situ Sensors Alerts Guidance Record Keeping Equip Sensors As-Applied Remote Sensing April May June July August September Yield Monitor Planting Irrigation Application Scouting Tillage Harvest Data Management Field Communication Field Communication Irrigation Scheduling Fertilizer/Chemical Applications Soil/Field Sampling Degree Day Tracking Scouting Web Access Models Models Models Models Risk Analysis April May June July August September Data Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc. Offsite Data Sources

Why Models Need Standards Convert input weather and other data to standard spatial and temporal scales. Quantify spatial and temporal uncertainties associated with standard input (weather) data scales. The combined uncertainties can define input accuracy. Create a standard glossary of variables and units. Create a standard variable nomenclature. Establish standard truth sets to evaluate model output precision and accuracy as a function of input accuracy. Create standard terms for model output. Specify experimental protocols for model verification. Define a standard application programming interface (API) for exchanging model configuration and output files in a standard format.

Scale of Weather Data Sources Relative to Farm, Field, Canopy CFSv2 GFS, NOGAPS NAM, RUC CFSv2 + NWS station network WRF, RTMA, GFSMOS + NWS graphical forecast (grid) + 1000 m SkyBit grid + 800 m PRISM grid Agricultural decision-making scales in blue box Precision Agriculture Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc.

Grid Versus Station Weather Data........ Weather Stations Source: http://www.research.noaa.gov/climate/images/modeling_grid.png Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc.

Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc. Converting Weather Data Sources to Standard Scales

Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc. Converting Weather Data Sources to Standard Scales

Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc. Converting Weather Data Sources to Standard Scales

Why Models Need Standards Convert input weather and other data to standard spatial and temporal scales.

Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc. Uncertainty Associated With Spatial Scales

Value Value Uncertainty Associated With Temporal Scales and Forecasts Observation 1- hour 6-hour 1-day 1-week 1-month 6-month 1-year Forecast 6-day 5-day 4-day 3-day 2-day 1-day Observation Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc.

Why Models Need Standards Convert input weather and other data to standard spatial and temporal scales. Quantify spatial and temporal uncertainties associated with standard input (weather) data scales. The combined uncertainties can define input accuracy.

Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc. Standard Glossary of Variables and Units

Why Models Need Standards Convert input weather and other data to standard spatial and temporal scales. Quantify spatial and temporal uncertainties associated with standard input (weather) data scales. The combined uncertainties can define input accuracy. Create a standard glossary of variables and units. Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc.

Standard Variable Nomenclature (1) Give variable name. Examples, temperature maximum temperature (2) Give original sampling interval. Examples, hourly temperature daily maximum temperature (3) State any statistics used to create a new variable from observations. Examples, daily average temperature (1/2maximum + 1/2minimum) (4) State any statistics used to derive a mean of the original observations for longer periods. You must state period of mean as days, months, years, etc. Examples, monthly mean of daily average temperature for 1961 monthly means of daily average temperature for 1961 thru 1995 annual mean of hourly temperature for 1961 annual means of hourly temperature for 1961 thru 1995 (5) State any statistics used to derive a normal for a long-term climatology. You must state period of normal as days, months, years, etc. Examples, 30-year normal of monthly means of daily average temperature for 1961-1990 10-year normal of annual means of hourly temperature for 1961 thru 1970 Note: It is implicitly understood that the monthly mean is for the same period as the normal. Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc.

Why Models Need Standards Convert input weather and other data to standard spatial and temporal scales. Quantify spatial and temporal uncertainties associated with standard input (weather) data scales. The combined uncertainties can define input accuracy. Create a standard glossary of variables and units. Create a standard variable nomenclature.

Model Output Precision and Accuracy Input Output Model (Black Box) ~ Model output compared (~) to truth set = Observation/ Forecast Input Accuracy = Model Output Precision = Model Output Accuracy Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc.

Model Output Precision and Accuracy How do we measure dew? Truth vs. Electric resistance threshold establishment droplet size sensor surface sensor angle compass direction canopy location

Why Models Need Standards Convert input weather and other data to standard spatial and temporal scales. Quantify spatial and temporal uncertainties associated with standard input (weather) data scales. The combined uncertainties can define input accuracy. Create a standard glossary of variables and units. Create a standard variable nomenclature. Establish standard truth sets to evaluate model output precision and accuracy as a function of input accuracy. Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc.

Terms for Plant Pathology Presence or absence of a disease in a canopy. Disease incidence is the proportion of a plant community that is infected. Disease severity is the proportion of a plant that is infected. Pathogen (urediniospore) intensity is the number of urediniospores per unit host area (cm 2 ). Disease counts are the number of uredinia or pustules per unit area. Primary disease counts are the number of uredinia resulting from primary infection due to the first deposition of urediniospores.

Terms for crop loss assessment depends on the disease Disease severity: percentage or proportion of plant area or fruit volume destroyed by a pathogen Disease incidence: proportion of a plant community that is diseased

Why Models Need Standards Convert input weather and other data to standard spatial and temporal scales. Quantify spatial and temporal uncertainties associated with standard input (weather) data scales. The combined uncertainties can define input accuracy. Create a standard glossary of variables and units. Create a standard variable nomenclature. Establish standard truth sets to evaluate model output precision and accuracy as a function of input accuracy. Create standard terms for model output.

Observational Protocol for Model Verification Can you use a 5 km area model to predict disease in a 100 m orchard? May 5, 2009 Biglerville, PA Copyright 2011 ZedX Inc. Source: pa-pipe.zedxinc.com

Observational Protocol for Model Verification Biglerville, PA Experimental Site 1000 m 100 m Copyright 2011 ZedX Inc.

Observational Protocol for Model Verification Biglerville, PA Experimental Site Credit: Jim Travis, Noemi Halbrendt, Penn State Fruit Research & Extension Station, Biglerville, PA

Observational Protocol for Model Verification Biglerville, PA Experimental Site 10 m Copyright 2013 ZedX Inc.

% Disease % Disease % Disease % Disease 100 80 60 40 20 0 Observational Protocol for Model Verification 2009 Scab Incidence on Shoot Leaves, Red Delicious University Drive Orchard, PSU-FREC, Biglerville, PA North Top of Block (R1) Center Canopy 5-5 5-18 5-26 6-1 Date Top Canopy 100 80 60 40 20 0 Slope Side of Block (R2 Center Canopy Top Canopy 5-5 5-18 5-26 6-1 Date Center Block (R3) South Block (R4 Center Canopy Top Canopy Center Canopy Top Canopy 100 100 80 60 40 20 0 5-5 5-18 5-26 6-1 Date 80 60 40 20 0 5-5 5-18 5-26 6-1 Date Credit: Jim Travis, Noemi Halbrendt, Penn State Fruit Research & Extension Station, Biglerville, PA

% Disease % Disease % Disease % Disease 100 80 60 40 20 0 Observational Protocol for Model Verification 2009 Scab Incidence on Shoot Leaves, Red Delicious University Drive Orchard, PSU-FREC, Biglerville, PA North Top of Block (R1) Center Canopy PA-PIPE 5 km Model 5-5 5-18 5-26 6-1 Date Top Canopy 100 80 60 40 20 0 Slope Side of Block (R2 Center Canopy Top Canopy 5-5 5-18 5-26 6-1 Date Center Block (R3) South Block (R4 Center Canopy Top Canopy Center Canopy Top Canopy 100 100 80 60 40 20 0 5-5 5-18 5-26 6-1 Date 80 60 40 20 0 5-5 5-18 5-26 6-1 Date Credit: Jim Travis, Noemi Halbrendt, Penn State Fruit Research & Extension Station, Biglerville, PA

Why Models Need Standards Convert input weather and other data to standard spatial and temporal scales. Quantify spatial and temporal uncertainties associated with standard input (weather) data scales. The combined uncertainties can define input accuracy. Create a standard glossary of variables and units. Create a standard variable nomenclature. Establish standard truth sets to evaluate model output precision and accuracy as a function of input accuracy. Create standard terms for model output. Specify experimental protocols for model verification.

Standard Model Configuration and Output Files Model Configuration File File Name: corn_country_state_xxx (county fips)_xxx (user number).conf Group= Corn Models Country= US State= PA (042) County= 027 (Centre) Site Name= ZedX Site ID= US_PA_027_001 Latitude, LAT= 40.8880 Longitude, LON= -77.7759 Elevation, ELV= 329 (meters) Standard Time Offset= -5 Daylight Start Date= 20040404 Daylight End Date= 20041031 Data Type= Obs Data Type= Fct Product= Standard Corn Phenology Sim Start Date= 20040301 Sim End Date= 20030930 User Para= crop= crn User Para= var= pioneer 3394 User Para= cmr= 110 Std Para= oset Std Para= phen User Para= seed= 2 Std Para= crdx User Para= pldate= 20040310 User Para= stex= sicl User Para= sdep= 20 Std Data= gcrnut Std Data= gcrnuc User Data= scrn Std Data= crdcrn

Standard Model Application Programming Interface (API) Manufacturer Seed Company 1 API Models (3 rd Party) API Management Template (USDA) Farmer FMIS 2 Wireless Media Seed Company 2 Equipment Company 1 AgGateway API API Product XML Equip XML Output XML FMIS Standard XML FMIS XML ISO XML ISO Standard XML Telematics Controller Core Data Consultant FMIS 1 AgFleet Service Provider FMIS 3 Local Data Implement Tractor XML AgGateway Standard XML FMIS XML Standard XML ISO 11783-10 Standard

Why Models Need Standards Convert input weather and other data to standard spatial and temporal scales. Quantify spatial and temporal uncertainties associated with standard input (weather) data scales. The combined uncertainties can define input accuracy. Create a standard glossary of variables and units. Create a standard variable nomenclature. Establish standard truth sets to evaluate model output precision and accuracy as a function of input accuracy. Create standard terms for model output. Specify experimental protocols for model verification. Define a standard application programming interface (API) for exchanging model configuration and output files in a standard format.

Offsite (Model) Data Specifications 1. Name of Data Set 2. Source (as in organization or individual) 3. Contact (to receive data) 4. Content of Data Set 5. Units (metric will be the standard) 6. Record Length (first to last date of availability) 7. Quality Control/Quality Assurance Procedure 8. Data Collection Protocol (material and method) 9. Domain (extent of area where data are available) 10. Spatial Resolution 11. Temporal Resolution 12. Update Frequency 13. Data Format (for transfer between source and user) 14. Storage Requirements (minimum size on user end) 15. Usage Policy (any restriction on type of user) 16. Citation Policy (when distributing data) 17. Privacy Policy 18. Cost 19. Access Instructions (for transfer between source and user) 20. Comment

Why Models Need Standards Convert input weather and other data to standard spatial and temporal scales. Quantify spatial and temporal uncertainties associated with standard input (weather) data scales. The combined uncertainties can define input accuracy. Create a standard glossary of variables and units. Create a standard variable nomenclature. Establish standard truth sets to evaluate model output precision and accuracy as a function of input accuracy. Create standard terms for model output. Specify experimental protocols for model verification. Define a standard application programming interface (API) for exchanging model configuration and output files in a standard format. Identify offsite (model) data specifications.

Thank You! Questions?