THE WORK OF EFIM ZELMANOV (FIELDS MEDAL 1994)

Similar documents
Khukhro, E. I. and Shumyatsky, P. MIMS EPrint: Manchester Institute for Mathematical Sciences School of Mathematics

Kevin James. p-groups, Nilpotent groups and Solvable groups

Two generator 4-Engel groups

Old and new questions in noncommutative ring theory

Pseudo Sylow numbers

THE GRIGORCHUK GROUP

NIL, NILPOTENT AND PI-ALGEBRAS

Algebra Exercises in group theory

Groups that are pairwise nilpotent

Solution of Brauer s k(b)-conjecture for π-blocks of π-separable groups

Smith theory. Andrew Putman. Abstract

THE FINITE BASIS QUESTION FOR VARIETIES OF GROUPS SOME RECENT RESULTS

NILPOTENCY INDEX OF NIL-ALGEBRA OF NIL-INDEX 3

BOUNDS ON ORDERS OF FINITE SUBGROUPS OF P GL n (K) Eli Aljadeff and Jack Sonn

Centralizers of Finite Subgroups in Simple Locally Finite Groups

Polynomials of small degree evaluated on matrices

1. Group Theory Permutations.

Note that a unit is unique: 1 = 11 = 1. Examples: Nonnegative integers under addition; all integers under multiplication.

Solutions of exercise sheet 8

MULTI-GGS-GROUPS HAVE THE CONGRUENCE SUBGROUP PROPERTY

D. S. Passman. University of Wisconsin-Madison

Algebra SEP Solutions

Exercises on chapter 1

ON VARIETIES IN WHICH SOLUBLE GROUPS ARE TORSION-BY-NILPOTENT

Section II.8. Normal and Subnormal Series

SOME RESIDUALLY FINITE GROUPS SATISFYING LAWS

MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS

SOME OPEN PROBLEMS IN THE THEORY OF INFINITE DIMENSIONAL ALGEBRAS

Math 594. Solutions 5

Algebraic Structures Exam File Fall 2013 Exam #1

Homological Decision Problems for Finitely Generated Groups with Solvable Word Problem

LIE RING METHODS IN THE THEORY OF FINITE NILPOTENT GROUPS

NILPOTENT NUMBERS JONATHAN PAKIANATHAN AND KRISHNAN SHANKAR

NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS

LANDAU S THEOREM, FIELDS OF VALUES FOR CHARACTERS, AND SOLVABLE GROUPS arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 26 Jun 2015

Examples of self-iterating Lie algebras

Recognising nilpotent groups

FINITE GROUPS AND EQUATIONS OVER FINITE FIELDS A PROBLEM SET FOR ARIZONA WINTER SCHOOL 2016

Adelic Profinite Groups

AN ALGEBRA PRIMER WITH A VIEW TOWARD CURVES OVER FINITE FIELDS

PERCOLATION ON GRIGORCHUK GROUPS

On the Burnside Problem

A Generalization of Wilson s Theorem

Bare-bones outline of eigenvalue theory and the Jordan canonical form

How many units can a commutative ring have?

Simple groups and the classification of finite groups

Finite groups determined by an inequality of the orders of their elements

List of topics for the preliminary exam in algebra

January 2016 Qualifying Examination

Oxford 13 March Surgery on manifolds: the early days, Or: What excited me in the 1960s. C.T.C.Wall

Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille

* 8 Groups, with Appendix containing Rings and Fields.

Groups with many subnormal subgroups. *

ON THE RESIDUALITY A FINITE p-group OF HN N-EXTENSIONS

A PROOF OF BURNSIDE S p a q b THEOREM

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM SPRING 2012

ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL

ERRATA. Abstract Algebra, Third Edition by D. Dummit and R. Foote (most recently revised on March 4, 2009)

Normal Automorphisms of Free Burnside Groups of Period 3

Sylow 2-Subgroups of Solvable Q-Groups

CHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL. Paul Vojta. University of California, Berkeley. 18 February 1998

Algebra Exam Syllabus

Multiplicative Jordan Decomposition in Integral Group Rings

AN AXIOMATIC FORMATION THAT IS NOT A VARIETY

Classifying Camina groups: A theorem of Dark and Scoppola

1 Kaplanski conjectures

Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order

Systems of distinct representatives/1

Implications of the index of a fixed point subgroup

GRE Subject test preparation Spring 2016 Topic: Abstract Algebra, Linear Algebra, Number Theory.

COMPACT GROUPS IN WHICH ALL ELEMENTS ARE ALMOST RIGHT ENGEL

FINITELY GENERATED SIMPLE ALGEBRAS: A QUESTION OF B. I. PLOTKIN

1 Fields and vector spaces

MATH 3030, Abstract Algebra FALL 2012 Toby Kenney Midyear Examination Friday 7th December: 7:00-10:00 PM

School of Mathematics and Statistics. MT5836 Galois Theory. Handout 0: Course Information

TEST CODE: PMB SYLLABUS

A Little Beyond: Linear Algebra

Landau s Theorem for π-blocks of π-separable groups

ERRATA. Abstract Algebra, Third Edition by D. Dummit and R. Foote (most recently revised on February 14, 2018)

On algebras arising from semiregular group actions

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

The following techniques for methods of proofs are discussed in our text: - Vacuous proof - Trivial proof

SPLITTING FIELDS AND PERIODS OF FIBONACCI SEQUENCES MODULO PRIMES

On quasi-frobenius semigroup algebras

Math 430 Exam 2, Fall 2008

Notation. 0,1,2,, 1 with addition and multiplication modulo

A Version of the Grothendieck Conjecture for p-adic Local Fields

CLASS FIELD THEORY WEEK Motivation

Integral Similarity and Commutators of Integral Matrices Thomas J. Laffey and Robert Reams (University College Dublin, Ireland) Abstract

On the Hausdorff spectrum of some groups acting on the p-adic tree

Classification of root systems

INVARIANT IDEALS OF ABELIAN GROUP ALGEBRAS UNDER THE MULTIPLICATIVE ACTION OF A FIELD, II

August 2015 Qualifying Examination Solutions

On Torsion-by-Nilpotent Groups

Amenable groups, Jacques Tits Alternative Theorem

PROFINITE GROUPS WITH RESTRICTED CENTRALIZERS

Math 3140 Fall 2012 Assignment #3

On a question of B.H. Neumann

arxiv:math/ v3 [math.qa] 16 Feb 2003

BY MolmS NEWMAN (1011) (11

Transcription:

THE WORK OF EFIM ZELMANOV (FIELDS MEDAL 1994) KAPIL H. PARANJAPE 1. Introduction Last year at the International Congress of Mathematicians (ICM 94) in Zürich, Switzerland one of the four recipients of the Fields Medal was a mathematician from the former Soviet Union Prof. Efim Zelmanov, now at the University of Wisconsin, USA. He has used techniques from the theory of non-commutative rings to settle a problem in group theory known as the Restricted Burnside Problem. In the following article I attempt to give a flavour of this Problem and the method of its final resolution. The material is largely based on the talk given by Zelmanov given at the ICM 90 held in Kyoto, Japan[13]. 2. Groups For basic definitions and results of group theory please see a standard text such as [2] or [8]. In a finite group G every element g satisfies g n = e for some least positive integer n called the order of g and denoted by (g). This leads us to, Problem 1 (General Burnside Problem). Let G be a finitely generated group such that for every element g of G there is a positive integer N g so that g Ng = e. Then is G finite? When G arises as a group of n n matrices (or more formally when G is a linear group) it was shown by Burnside that the answer is yes (a simple proof is outlined in Appendix A). However, in 1964 Golod and Shafarevich [3] showed that this is not true for all groups. Thereafter, Alyoshin [1], Suschansky [12], Grigorchuk [4] and Gupta Sidki [5] gave various counterexamples. We can tighten the above conjecture since we know that, (g) divides (G) the number of elements of the set of elements of G. Thus we can formulate, Problem 2 (Ordinary Burnside Problem). Let G be a finitely generated group for which there is a positive integer N such that for every element g we have g N = e. Then is G finite? (We call the smallest such integer N the exponent of G.) In 1968 Novikov and Adian [10] gave counter-examples for groups of odd exponents for the Ordinary Burnside Problem. 1

2 KAPIL H. PARANJAPE If we are primarily interested only in finite groups and their classification then we can again restrict the problem further. Thus Magnus [9] formulated the following problem. Problem 3 (Restricted Burnside Problem). Is there a finite number A(k, N) of finite groups which are generated by k elements and have exponent N? Alternatively one can ask if the order of all such groups is uniformly bounded. Hall and Higman [6] proved that the Restricted Burnside problem for a number N which can be factorised as p n 1 1 pnr r follows from the following three hypothesis: (1) The Restricted Burnside Problem is true for p n i i. (2) There are at most finitely many finite simple group quotients which are k-generated and have exponent N. (3) For each finite simple group quotient G as above the group of outer automorphisms of G is a solvable group. Thus modulo the latter two problems which have to do with the Classification of Finite Simple groups, we reduced to a study of the Restricted Burnside Problem for p-groups. We note that a key step in the Classification of Finite Simple groups was the celebrated theorem of Feit and Thompson which won a Fields Medal in 1970. According to this theorem if N is odd then there are no finite simple groups in items (2) and (3) above. 3. p-groups For our purposes a p-group is a finite group such that it has p a elements for some non-negative integer a. The Restricted Burnside problem for such groups can be stated as follows. Problem 4 (Restricted Burnside Problem for p-groups). Let G be a finite group with exponent p n which is generated by k elements. Then G has p a elements for some integer a. Is there a uniform bound a(k, n) for a? To study p-groups we first note that these are nilpotent. We define the Central series for G G 1 = G and by induction on i, G i = [G, G i 1 ] Recall that G is nilpotent if G i is the trivial group of order 1 for some i. Now if G is a p-group then the abelian groups G i /G i+1 have order a power of p. Thus we can construct a finer series called the p-central series for G a p-group G 1 = G and G i+1 is the subgroup generated by [G, G i ] and the set G p i By the above discussion it follows that G i becomes trivial for large enough i; in addition, each G i /G i+1 is a vector space over Z/pZ for all smaller i. The Z/pZ-vector space L(G) is defined as L(G) = i G i /G i+1

THE WORK OF EFIM ZELMANOV (FIELDS MEDAL 1994) 3 The non-commutative structure of G can be caught by a Lie algebra structure on L(G). We recall the definition of a Lie algebra. Definition 1. A vector space L over a field k is said to be a lie algebra if there is a pairing [, ] : L L L with the following properties [x, y] = [y, x] and [x, [y, z]] + [z, [x, y]] + [y, [z, x]] = 0 The Lie algebra structure on L(G) is given by G i /G i+1 G j /G j+1 G i+j /G i+j+1 where the map is (x, y) xyx 1 y 1 (Check that this is well-defined!). The above lie algebra has some additional structure. First is an identity proved by Higman [7]. If G has exponent p n then σ S p n 1 ad(a σ(1) ) ad(a σ(2) ) ad(a σ(p n 1)) = 0 as a map L(G) L(G); here ad(a) : L L for any element a in a Lie algebra is the map b [a, b]. The second identity is proved by Sanov [11]. Let x i be the elements of G 0 /G 1 L(G) corresponding to the finitely many generators g i of G. Then for any ρ a commutator on the x i we have ad(ρ) pn = 0. The main result of Zelmanov can formulated as follows. Theorem 1 (Zelmanov). Let L be any Lie algebra over Z/pZ which is generated as a Lie algebra by k elements x i such that we have the Higman and Sanov identities.then L is nilpotent as a Lie algebra. The interested reader can find this proof outlined in [13]. 4. The Proof of the Problem Now we claim that the Restricted Burnside Problem has an affirmative answer for exponent p n. Let us examine this claim. To prove the Restricted Burnside Problem we need to show that the order p a of a k-generated p- group G of exponent p n is uniformly bounded by some constant p a(k,n). Now we have dim Z/pZ L(G) = a. Thus it is enough to bound the dimension of the Lie algebra L(G). As in the case of the free group we can construct a universal Lie algebra L which is generated by k elements and satisfies the Higman and Sanov identities. Assuming the above theorem L is nilpotent. But then the abelian sub-quotients of the central series of L have a specified number of generators in terms of the generators of L and are thus finite dimensional. Thus L is itself finite dimensional, say of dimension a(k, n). Since any L(G) is a quotient of L its dimension is also bounded by a(k, n) and this proves the result. The rest of the Restricted Burnside Problem now follows since we have the result of Hall and Higman and also a complete Classification of Finite Simple groups by Feit, Thompson, Aschbacher et al.

4 KAPIL H. PARANJAPE Appendix A. A proof for Linear groups Let G be a finitely generated subgroup of the group of invertible n n matrices over complex numbers. We give a proof for the Ordinary Burnside problem first. Let R be the collection of complex linear combinations of elements of G. The R is a finite dimensional vector space over the field of complex numbers spanned by the elements of G; thus there are elements g 1,..., g r of G which form a basis of R. Now suppose r is an element of R such that the traces Trace(g i r) = 0 all vanish. Then we obtain Trace(r n ) = 0 for all positive integers n by expressing r n 1 as a linear combination of the g i. But then these identities imply that r = 0. Thus an element g of G is uniquely determined once we know Trace(g i g) for all i (if Trace(g i g) = Trace(g i h) then apply the above argument to r = g h). Now we are given that each element of G satisfies g N = e. Thus the trace of any element of G is a sum of n numbers of the form exp(2π 1 k/n) for k = 1,..., N. But there are only finitely such sums. Thus by the previous paragraph there are only finitely many elements in G. (Exercise: use the above argument to provide an explicit bound). We now show how to reduce the General Burnside Problem to the Ordinary Burnside Problem in this case. Let K be the field generated (over the field Q of rational numbers) by the matrix coefficients of the finite collection of generators of G. Let L be the subfield of K consisting of all algebraic numbers (elements satisfying a polynomial with rational coefficients). Since K is finitely generated L is a finite extension of Q. Now any element g of G has finite order. Hence the eigenvalues of g are roots of unity. Moreover, the characteristic polynomial of g has coefficients in the field K; since its roots are algebraic numbers the coefficients are in L. Thus the eigenvalues are roots of unity satisfying a polynomial of degree n over L; hence if d is the degree of the field extension L of Q we have roots of unity of degree at most n d over Q. There are only finitely many such roots of unity. Thus the order of G is bounded. References [1] S. V. Alyoshin, Finite automata and the Burnside problem on periodic groups, Matem. Zametki 11 (1972), no. 3, 319 328. [2] M. Artin, Algebra, Eastern Economy Edition, Bombay, 1995. [3] E. S. Golod, On nil algebras and residually finite p-groups, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR 28 (1964), no. 2, 273 276. [4] R. I. Grigorchuk, On the Burnside problem for periodic groups, Funct. Anal. Appl. 14 (1980), no. 1, 53 54. [5] N. Gupta and S. Sidki, On the Burnside problem for periodic groups, Math. Z. 182 (1983), 385 386. [6] P. Hall and G. Higman, On the p-length of p-solvable groups and reduction theorems for Burnside s problem, Proc. London Math. Soc. 3 (1956), 1 42.

THE WORK OF EFIM ZELMANOV (FIELDS MEDAL 1994) 5 [7] G. Higman, Lie ring methods in the theory of finite nilpotent groups, in Proc. of ICM 1958 Edinburgh UK, Edinburgh Math. Society. [8] I. Herstein, Topics in Algebra, Prentice Hall India, New Delhi, 1975. [9] W. Magnus, A connection between the Baker-Hausdorff formula and a problem of Burnside, Ann. Math. 52 (1950), 11 56; Errata 57 (1953) 606. [10] P. S. Novikov and S. I. Adian, On infinite periodic groups I,II, III, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR 32 (1968), no. 1, 212 244; no. 2 251-254; no. 3 709-731. [11] I. N. Sanov, On a certain system of relations is periodic groups of prime power exponent, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR 19 (1951), 477 502. [12] V. I. Suschansky, Periodic p-groups of permutations and the General Burnside Problem, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 247 (1979), no. 3, 447 461. [13] E. I. Zelmanov, On the Restricted Burnside Problem, pages 395-402 in Proceedings of ICM 1990 Kyoto Japan, Math. Society of Japan. School of Mathematics, TIFR, Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400 005 E-mail address: kapil@@math.tifr.res.in