Earthquake Commission Darfield Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report New Brighton

Similar documents
Earthquake Commission. Darfield Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report Avondale

REPORT. Earthquake Commission. Christchurch Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report Hillsborough Appendix B: Cone Penetration Testing

Increased Liquefaction Vulnerability (ILV) Engineering Assessment

Geotechnical Completion Report Knights Stream Park Stage3A Development (Lots 107 to 148)

Christchurch CBD: Lessons Learnt and Strategies for Foundation Remediation 22 February 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand, Earthquake

Foundations on Deep Alluvial Soils

Developments in geotechnical site investigations in Christchurch following the Canterbury earthquake sequence

Performance and Post Earthquake Assessment of CFA Pile Ground Improvement 22 February 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand Earthquake

Comparison between predicted liquefaction induced settlement and ground damage observed from the Canterbury earthquake sequence

Consideration of Ground Variability Over an Area of Geological Similarity as Part of Liquefaction Assessment for Foundation Design

REPORT. Ngai Tahu Property Ltd. Wigram Skies Subdivision Geotechnical Assessment

Area-wide geotechnical information summary for CERA zoning review panel

GUIDANCE D. Part D: Guidelines for the geotechnical investigation and assessment of subdivisions in the Canterbury region.

LSN a new methodology for characterising the effects of liquefaction in terms of relative land damage severity

Area-wide geotechnical information summary for CERA zoning review panel

The LSN Calculation and Interpolation Process

Rosemerryn Subdivision, Lincoln Stages 10 to 18 Geotechnical Investigation Report Fulton Hogan Land Development Limited

Liquefaction induced ground damage in the Canterbury earthquakes: predictions vs. reality

3.4 Typical Soil Profiles

Guidelines for Geotechnical Site Investigation for Residential Building Consents in Hastings District. (Draft)

Area-wide geotechnical information summary for CERA zoning review panel

Area-wide geotechnical information summary for CERA zoning review panel

Appendix C: Groundwater modelling methodology

A practical seismic liquefaction zoning system for risk management of urban development

A high-resolution shear wave velocity model for near surface soils in Christchurch using CPT data

Improvement mechanisms of stone columns as a mitigation measure against liquefaction-induced lateral spreading

REPORT. Earthquake Commission. Christchurch Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report Bryndwr Appendix C: Borehole Logs

Comparison of existing CPT- correlations with Canterbury-specific seismic CPT data

Reliability of lateral stretch estimates in Canterbury earthquakes

Tonkin & Taylor Christchurch Central City Geological Interpretative Report

Nonlinear shear stress reduction factor (r d ) for Christchurch Central Business District

Forms of Flat Land Damage

REPORT. Liquefaction Vulnerability and Geotechnical Assessment Guidance for Gisborne District Council. Gisborne District Council.

Macro and micro scale assessment and quantification of Ground damage following the Canterbury 2010/2011 Earthquake sequence

Geotechnical Investigation of 32 Chapter Street, Saint Albans, Christchurch

Hawke s Bay Liquefaction Hazard Report - Frequently Asked Questions

Analysis of Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading Data from the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch Earthquakes

Case Study - Undisturbed Sampling, Cyclic Testing and Numerical Modelling of a Low Plasticity Silt

Canterbury Earthquake Sequence: Increased Liquefaction Vulnerability Assessment Methodology

Imaging Unknown Faults in Christchurch, New Zealand, after a M6.2 Earthquake

Guidelines for Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Reports for Essential and Hazardous Facilities and Major and Special-Occupancy Structures in Oregon

Regional Liquefaction Study for Waimakariri District

Geotechnical issues in seismic assessments: When do I need a geotechnical specialist?

BELFAST SEWERS PROJECT

Distribution: Tonkin & Taylor Ltd (FILE) 1 copy 1 copy

Sensitivity of predicted liquefaction-induced lateral spreading displacements from the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch earthquakes

5 Information used for the ILV Assessment

Feilding Liquefaction Study Geotechnical Evaluation Interpretive Report

10 Stage 2 Assessments

Soil type identification and fines content estimation using the Screw Driving Sounding (SDS) data

REPORT STAGE 1 REPORT. Earthquake Commission. Darfield Earthquake 4 September 2010 Geotechnical Land Damage Assessment & Reinstatement Report

Comparison of liquefaction-induced land damage and geomorphic variability in Avonside, New Zealand

NZ Transport Agency s Detailed Design Guidance for Piled Bridges at Sites Prone to Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading

BP Connect Development Turangi Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment Report

Sensitivity of predicted liquefaction-induced lateral displacements from the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch Earthquakes

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AT 29 PETRIES ROAD, WOODEND. KIRK ROBERTS CONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD

Pore pressure response during high frequency sonic drilling and SPT

2012 Caernarfon Award Submission New Zealand LAND DAMAGE ASSESSMENT LIQUEFACTION & LATERAL SPREAD

An application of liquefaction hazard evaluation in urban planning

Lake Rotoiti Wastewater Scheme - Stage 1 Investigations. Rotorua Lakes Council

REPORT Palmerston North City Council

Geophysical Site Investigation (Seismic methods) Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOSTER BLOCK, GOULDS ROAD ROLLESTON

REPORT. Housing Re-Zone. Middle Road and Iona Road - Geotechnical Investigation Report

The Impact of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) Earthquake on the Geodetic Infrastructure in New Zealand 1

SHAKING AND GROUND FAILURE-INDUCED DAMAGE TO BUILDINGS BY THE 2010 AND 2011 CHRISTCHURCH EARTHQUAKES AND ITS LESSONS

Milford Centre Ltd. Private Plan Change GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT

Hydraulic uplift forces on basements subject to liquefaction

Cyclic strength testing of Christchurch sands with undisturbed samples

Geotechnical Engineering and Resilience

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

Assessment of liquefaction risk in the Hawke's Bay Volume 1: The liquefaction hazard model

SURFACE GEOLOGY AND LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY IN THE INNER RIO GRANDE VALLEY NEAR ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO

Geotechnical verification of impact compaction

14 Geotechnical Hazards

Free Range Broiler Farm, Arapohue: Geotechnical assessment

16 January 2018 Job Number: RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN

Preston Downs Lot 295/296 Geotechnical Subdivision Report GW West Melton Limited

Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading Misko Cubrinovski University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

Earthquake Risk Assessment of Flood Protection Assets in the Wellington Region

Appendix N. Engineering Design Consultants Limited Liquefaction Potential Assessment Interpretive Geotechnical Report

Report prepared for: Report prepared by: Auckland Council. Geotechnical Desk Study South Auckland Rural Urban Boundary Project.

Literature Review of Liquefaction Research with a Case Study of Christchurch, NZ

COASTAL QUATERNARY GEOLOGY MAPPING FOR NSW: EXAMPLES AND APPLICATIONS

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section

Omaroro Lower Playing Field - Geotechnical Interpretive Report

Christchurch ocean outfall pumping station liquefaction mitigation

Probabilistic Earthquake Risk Assessment of Newcastle and Lake Macquarie Part 1 Seismic Hazard.

Keywords: CPTu, pore water pressure, liquefaction analysis, Canterbury earthquake sequence

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

The key natural hazards relevant to the Project area relate to seismic activity and flood risk.

Characterisation of Liquefaction Features in Eastern Christchurch, New Zealand

Redcliffs Park Coastal inundation and coastal erosion

Slope Stability Review

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS Geotechnical Aspects of Site Evaluation and Foundations in NPPs, NS-G-3.6

Integrated geological approach to the study of coastal subsidence in Emilia-Romagna. Luisa PERINI Calabrese Lorenzo, Luciani Paolo, Severi Paolo,

Liquefaction potential of Rotorua soils

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION HANDBOOK Second Edition

The Effect of Sea Level Rise on Liquefaction Vulnerability

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE

Transcription:

REPORT Earthquake Commission Darfield Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report New Brighton

REPORT Earthquake Commission Darfield Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report New Brighton Report prepared for: EARTHQUAKE COMMISSION Report prepared by: TONKIN & TAYLOR LTD Distribution: EARTHQUAKE COMMISSION TONKIN & TAYLOR LTD (FILE) 3 copies 1 copy February 2011 T&T Ref: REP-NBT-FAC

Table of contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Project background 1 3 Site description 2 3.1 General 2 3.2 Regional geology 2 4 Geotechnical investigations 2 4.1 General 2 4.2 Cone penetration testing (CPT) 2 4.3 Machine boreholes 3 4.4 Geophysical testing 4 5 Groundwater observations 4 6 Laboratory testing 4 7 Environment Canterbury information 4 8 References 4 Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D: Investigation Location Plans Cone Penetration Testing Geophysical Testing Environment Canterbury Boreholes

1 1 Introduction The Earthquake Commission (EQC) engaged Tonkin & Taylor (T&T) to undertake site investigations around selected suburbs of Canterbury following the Darfield Earthquake sequence that started on 4 September 2010. These site investigations comprise: a) Cone penetration testing b) Machine boreholes c) Geophysical testing d) Groundwater observations e) Laboratory testing Site investigation works and factual reporting is being undertaken for a number of suburbs that were affected by liquefaction induced land damage. The report contains factual data to provide a geotechnical source for council consent applications for the suburb. This report presents all currently available geotechnical and engineering geological investigations that were commissioned by EQC after the 2010 Darfield Earthquake and all readily available data that Environment Canterbury and Christchurch City Council hold for the suburb. This is a factual report of field investigations. The field investigations have been undertaken at discrete locations and no inferences about the nature and continuity of ground conditions away from the investigations locations are made. No interpretation of investigation results has been made in this report. 2 Project background The magnitude (M) 7.1 Darfield Earthquake occurred on 4 September 2010. The epicentre was close to the town of Darfield, approximately 40 km west of Christchurch. The earthquake caused extensive ground liquefaction, in localised areas of Canterbury. The liquefaction resulted in major ground settlement, lateral spreading and, to a lesser extent, foundation support failure, with consequential building damage. T&T carried out a broad geotechnical land damage assessment and mapping of the main urban areas in the Canterbury region that have been significantly affected by strong ground motion arising from the earthquake. The results of that assessment are presented in the T&T Stage 1 report (Ref 1) dated October 2010 and released to the general public by EQC. The Stage 1 report presented the land damage categorisation, mapping methodology, information and results generated to 1 October 2010. Land remediation concepts and generalised land remediation options were also presented. The T&T Stage 2 report (Ref 2) dated November 2010 and released to the general public by EQC is based on a detailed suburb-by-suburb engineering assessment into the nature and extent of land damage. It also identifies land repair strategies for each suburb and areas most affected by land damage. The report presents 22,500 mapped properties as at 5 November 2010 in Canterbury and separates them into three recovery zones; A, B and C. These recovery zones relate to the extent of land repair required and allow for a coordinated recovery plan.

2 3 Site description 3.1 General New Brighton subject area is located in the north of Christchurch approximately 6 km from Christchurch CBD (Drawing LOC-NBT-01, Appendix A). The subject area is within the Christchurch City Council jurisdiction. The Avon River runs through the south of the subject area. The area is low lying and topographically is typically flat. 3.2 Regional geology Geology of the Christchurch Urban Area (Ref 3) shows the subject area of New Brighton to be underlain by three different geologies, sand, silt and occasional peat deposits of drained lagoons and estuaries, sand of fixed and semi-fixed dunes and beach deposits, and alluvial sand and silt overbank deposits. All three deposits are of Holocene age. 4 Geotechnical investigations 4.1 General The geotechnical investigations commissioned by EQC from September 2010 were determined and located under direction from T&T. The locations were selected taking into account access for the site investigation plant, the presence of services and any traffic management requirements. The current investigations comprise: (a) 24 Cone penetration tests (CPTs) (b) 480 m of MASW geophysical testing The location of the site investigations is shown on Drawing GIP-NBT-01 (Appendix A) and each of the above investigation techniques is discussed below. 4.2 Cone penetration testing (CPT) Five companies were commissioned to provide CPT probing services on this project and information on the CPT rig capability is summarised briefly below. The output of each CPT rig varies and therefore the testing data has been produced on a standard T&T template. The company which carried out each CPT test is identified on the CPT log. The companies that carried out the testing were: a) Opus International Consultants Ltd (Opus) - 18T truck-mounted rig b) Perry Drilling Ltd (Perry) - 20T rubber tracked truck-mounted rig c) McMillan Drilling Services (McMillan) - 14T truck-mounted rig d) Geotech Drilling (Geotech) - 16T truck-mounted rig e) Ground Investigations Ltd (GI) - self-augering Pagani CPT rig. The rig augers reaction anchors into place in the ground in order to drive a standard CPTu cone with up to 20T of force. Selected CPT probes had down-hole seismic shear wave velocity testing carried out. These are identified on each CPT log and summarised in Table 4-1 below.

3 Each CPT probe location was pre-dug by hand to between 800 mm and 1200 mm to mitigate the risk of unforeseen underground services being present at the selected investigation locations. The results of the CPT probing are presented in Appendix B. The CPT testing undertaken is summarised in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 Cone penetration testing summary CPT ID Maximum depth (m) Location (me) Location (mn) Ground Surface R.L CPT-NBT-01 16.95 2485975.4 5745633.8 1.96 CPT-NBT-02 15.30 2486131.7 5745519.1 1.78 Comments CPT-NBT-03 0.00 2486173.3 5745319.9 1.76 Seismic CPT CPT-NBT-04 15.26 2486122.1 5745083.2 1.68 CPT-NBT-05 18.14 2486316.5 5744950.8 1.54 CPT-NBT-06 20.49 2486521.5 5744783.4 1.41 Seismic CPT CPT-NBT-07 14.27 2486769.7 5744668.4 1.59 CPT-NBT-08 14.31 2486821.6 5744921.7 2.26 CPT-BUR-38 12.53 2485148.0 5745199.5 1.98 CPT-BUR-39 25.99 2485074.1 5745064.4 1.96 CPT-BUR-40 19.53 2485244.0 5745047.0 1.91 Seismic CPT CPT-BUR-41 34.12 2485447.6 5745076.9 1.66 CPT-BUR-42 12.79 2485332.8 5745456.6 2.26 CPT-BUR-43 13.30 2485303.0 5745859.0 1.97 CPT-BUR-44 27.72 2485537.5 5745837.6 1.98 CPT-BUR-45 26.20 2485779.8 5745636.6 1.49 Seismic CPT CPT-BUR-46 24.36 2485770.0 5745438.3 1.57 CPT-BUR-57 32.77 2485108.0 5745028.3 1.46 CPT-BUR-58 32.90 2485169.4 5745013.1 1.41 CPT-BUR-59 33.18 2485309.3 5745033.1 1.39 CPT-BUR-60 33.84 2485384.2 5745055.0 1.66 CPT-AVD-11 17.14 2485334.3 5744891.9 1.93 CPT-AVD-12 15.16 2486054.0 5744924.7 2.07 CPT-AVD-13 17.20 2486076.4 5745033.7 1.78 4.3 Machine boreholes No machine boreholes have been carried out in the suburb of New Brighton.

4 4.4 Geophysical testing Southern Geophysical Ltd completed a series of geophysics tests at specified locations within the suburb. The testing comprised Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) and was used to provide a shear wave velocity profile with depth. The geophones used were typically spaced at 1.0 m centres, which have produced a vertical profile extending around 13.0 m below ground level. This technique was carried out at approximately 5.0 m centres to provide a two dimensional profile of subsurface shear wave velocities. Copies of the geophysical testing results are presented in Appendix C. 5 Groundwater observations In New Brighton, during the investigations, groundwater depths ranged 3.1 to 0.5 m below existing ground level. These identified levels were based on dynamic pore water pressure results in CPT testing and field observations of waterways (rivers and streams). 6 Laboratory testing No laboratory testing has been carried out for the subject area. 7 Environment Canterbury information Additional borehole data, which is held by Environment Canterbury for the subject area, has been included in Appendix D. This data has been reproduced with the permission of Environment Canterbury and forms part of previous investigations undertaken by a variety of geotechnical consultants. Records for boreholes outside of the area covered by this report may be obtained from Environment Canterbury. 8 References 1. Tonkin & Taylor Ltd (October 2010), prepared for the Earthquake Commission Darfield Earthquake 4 September 2010 Geotechnical Land Damage Assessment & Reinstatement Report STAGE 1 REPORT. 2. Tonkin & Taylor Ltd (November 2010), prepared for the Earthquake Commission Darfield Earthquake 4 September 2010 Geotechnical Land Damage Assessment & Reinstatement Report STAGE 2 REPORT. 3. Brown, L.J.; Weeber, J.H. (1992), Geology of the Christchurch urban area. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1:25,000 geological map 1. 1 sheet + 104p. Lower Hutt, New Zealand, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited.

5