(Dynamical) quantum typicality: What is it and what are its physical and computational implications?

Similar documents
From unitary dynamics to statistical mechanics in isolated quantum systems

Simulating Quantum Systems through Matrix Product States. Laura Foini SISSA Journal Club

Mixing Quantum and Classical Mechanics: A Partially Miscible Solution

What is thermal equilibrium and how do we get there?

1 Traces, Traces Everywhere (5 points)

Time-dependent DMRG:

Response of quantum pure states. Barbara Fresch 1, Giorgio J. Moro 1

Efficient time evolution of one-dimensional quantum systems

Thermodynamical cost of accuracy and stability of information processing

High-Temperature Criticality in Strongly Constrained Quantum Systems

Typical quantum states at finite temperature

Lecture 2: Open quantum systems

1 Mathematical preliminaries

Spin-Boson Model. A simple Open Quantum System. M. Miller F. Tschirsich. Quantum Mechanics on Macroscopic Scales Theory of Condensed Matter July 2012

Giant Enhancement of Quantum Decoherence by Frustrated Environments

Ensembles and incomplete information

Solution Set 3. Hand out : i d dt. Ψ(t) = Ĥ Ψ(t) + and

Non-Markovian Quantum Dynamics of Open Systems: Foundations and Perspectives

Simple one-dimensional potentials

Decoherence and Thermalization of Quantum Spin Systems

Quantum measurement theory and micro-macro consistency in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics

Classical and quantum simulation of dissipative quantum many-body systems

Quantum Mechanics + Open Systems = Thermodynamics? Jochen Gemmer Tübingen,

Lecture 4: Entropy. Chapter I. Basic Principles of Stat Mechanics. A.G. Petukhov, PHYS 743. September 7, 2017

Quantum mechanics in one hour

Einselection without pointer states -

P3317 HW from Lecture and Recitation 10

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 24 Dec 2003

Dephasing, relaxation and thermalization in one-dimensional quantum systems

NON-EQUILIBRIUM DYNAMICS IN

The Quantum Heisenberg Ferromagnet

2 The Density Operator

Typicality paradigm in Quantum Statistical Thermodynamics Barbara Fresch, Giorgio Moro Dipartimento Scienze Chimiche Università di Padova

4.3 Lecture 18: Quantum Mechanics

The goal of equilibrium statistical mechanics is to calculate the diagonal elements of ˆρ eq so we can evaluate average observables < A >= Tr{Â ˆρ eq

C/CS/Phys C191 Particle-in-a-box, Spin 10/02/08 Fall 2008 Lecture 11

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2004 Assignment 3

Quantum quenches in the thermodynamic limit

NANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Fabian Essler (Oxford)

Quantum Mechanics I Physics 5701

Quantum Reservoir Engineering

Quantum Chaos and Nonunitary Dynamics

Time evolution of states in quantum mechanics 1

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND TYPOS (send to

Recurrences and Full-revivals in Quantum Walks

Trapped ion spin-boson quantum simulators: Non-equilibrium physics and thermalization. Diego Porras

S.K. Saikin May 22, Lecture 13

Optimal quantum driving of a thermal machine

Frustration-free Ground States of Quantum Spin Systems 1

4 Matrix product states

Storage of Quantum Information in Topological Systems with Majorana Fermions

(# = %(& )(* +,(- Closed system, well-defined energy (or e.g. E± E/2): Microcanonical ensemble

Automorphic Equivalence Within Gapped Phases

Anderson Localization Looking Forward

Second Quantization: Quantum Fields

The quantum state as a vector

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

Time Evolving Block Decimation Algorithm

Many-Body Localization. Geoffrey Ji

Quantum Light-Matter Interactions

Taming the non-equilibrium: Equilibration, thermalization and the predictions of quantum simulations

C/CS/Phys C191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell 10/06/07 Fall 2009 Lecture 12

3 Symmetry Protected Topological Phase

Classical Monte Carlo Simulations

The general reason for approach to thermal equilibrium of macroscopic quantu

Quantum Mechanics C (130C) Winter 2014 Final exam

The Kubo formula of the electric conductivity

Lyapunov-based control of quantum systems

10. Zwanzig-Mori Formalism

First Problem Set for Physics 847 (Statistical Physics II)

Vibronic quantum dynamics of exciton relaxation/trapping in molecular aggregates

Techniques for translationally invariant matrix product states

Hydrodynamics. Stefan Flörchinger (Heidelberg) Heidelberg, 3 May 2010

On solving many-body Lindblad equation and quantum phase transition far from equilibrium

10. Zwanzig-Mori Formalism

arxiv: v4 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 25 Jun 2015

Space from Superstring Bits 1. Charles Thorn

Physics 7240: Advanced Statistical Mechanics Lecture 1: Introduction and Overview

arxiv: v3 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 7 Jan 2015

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 5 Apr 2018

Sweep from Superfluid to Mottphase in the Bose-Hubbard model p.1/14

Physics 581, Quantum Optics II Problem Set #4 Due: Tuesday November 1, 2016

Emergent Fluctuation Theorem for Pure Quantum States

1 Equal-time and Time-ordered Green Functions

Physics 4022 Notes on Density Matrices

H ψ = E ψ. Introduction to Exact Diagonalization. Andreas Läuchli, New states of quantum matter MPI für Physik komplexer Systeme - Dresden

Theoretical design of a readout system for the Flux Qubit-Resonator Rabi Model in the ultrastrong coupling regime

Two and Three-Dimensional Systems

Haydock s recursive solution of self-adjoint problems. Discrete spectrum

Bethe Ansatz Solutions and Excitation Gap of the Attractive Bose-Hubbard Model

Quantum Phase Transitions

Entanglement Entropy in Extended Quantum Systems

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

The nature of superfluidity in the cold atomic unitary Fermi gas

GRAPH QUANTUM MECHANICS

The 4th Windsor Summer School on Condensed Matter Theory Quantum Transport and Dynamics in Nanostructures Great Park, Windsor, UK, August 6-18, 2007

Language of Quantum Mechanics

Thermalization and Revivals after a Quantum Quench in a Finite System

Transcription:

(Dynamical) : What is it and what are its physical and computational implications? Jochen Gemmer University of Osnabrück, Kassel, May 13th, 214

Outline Thermal relaxation in closed quantum systems? Typicality in a nutshell Numerical experiment: model, observables and results Typicality in formulas Spin transport in the Heisenberg chain Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis

Thermal relaxation in closed quantum systems? Why it should occur: We see it in system we assume to be closed. Why it should not occur: There are issues with the underlying theory: (Non-eq.) Thermodynamics autonomous dynamics of a few macrovariables attractive fixed point, equilibrium often describable by master equations, Fokker-Planck equations, stochastic processes, etc. Quantum Mechanics autonomous dynamics of the wave function (number of parameters: insane) no attractive fixed point (Schroedinger equation) Schroedinger equation is no rate equation Quantum systems that explicitly exhibit relaxation but are not of the small system + large bath type appear to be rare in the literature. To cut it short: Why and how do two cups of coffee thermalize each other?

Typicality in a nutshell The naive view on relaxation i.e. 2nd law of thermodynamcis: QM: ˆρ = ψ ψ evolves into ˆρ eq = 1 Ĥ Z e kt or ˆρ eq 1 ˆδ(Ĥ E) Z problem: invariance of Von Neuman-entropy traditional cure: open quantum systems this requires: environment special structure of structure of environment: large, broad band (oscillator) bath adequate weak coupling, applicability of projection techniques specific initial states: factorizing, thermal bath... etc. Typicality: ˆρ = ψ ψ does not evolve into ˆρ eq = 1 Ĥ Z e kt, ˆρ eq = 1 ˆδ(Ĥ E) Z but ψ Â(t) ψ evolves into Tr{ˆρ eq Â} for many (all?) Â... Can this be true?

Numerical experiment: model and observables spin-model L R Heisenberg-type Hamiltonian: A ladder with anisotropic, XXZ-type couplings which are strong along the legs and weak along the rungs: Ĥ = ij J ij (ˆσ i xˆσ j x + ˆσ i yˆσ j y +.6 ˆσ i zˆσ j z), J ij = 1 for solid lines, J ij = κ =.2 for dotted lines and J ij = otherwise. Total number of spins: N = 32. The z-component of total magnetization S z = i ˆσi z is conserved We analyze: magnetization difference ˆx ( ˆx = ˆσ z l ) ˆσ z r r R l L eigenvalues of ˆx within the subspace of vanishing total magnetization, S z = : X = 16, 14,...,+16.

Numerical experiment: results (Phys. Rev. E, 89, 42113, (214) ˆx: z-magnetization difference between legs P X (t): probability to find a certain X P x (t) 1.8.6.4.2 15 1 5-5 2-1 -15 x data from solving the Schroedinger equation (N = 32) for two pure, partially random initial states: ψ X () = e αĥ2ˆp xˆp(s z = ) ω, (remark: taking this picture took 6h on 65 CPU s. Thanks to: 4 6 8 t 1 H. de Raedt, K. Michielsen (Juelich)) <x(t)> σ ² (t) 12 8 4 time shifted ˆx(t) <x()>=2 <x()>=4 <x()>=6 <x()>=8 <x()>=1 <x()>=12 5 1 15 t 12 8 4 variances of x <x()>= <x()>=2 <x()>=4 <x()>=6 <x()>=8 <x()>=1 <x()>=12 typical variance 5 1 15 t

Typicality in formulas (Phys. Rev. Lett., 12, 1143 (29), Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 1927 (21)) static typicality < A >:= Tr{Â}/d: expectation value of the maximally mixed state ω uniform random states sampled according to the unitary invariant measure HA[ ω Â ω ] =< A > HV[ ω Â(t) ω ] = 1 ( < A 2 > < A > 2) d + 1 In a high dimensional Hilbert space almost all possible states feature very similar expectation values for observables with bound spectra. It is no surprise to find these expectation values eventually. dynamical typicality ψ := ˆρd ω : taylored, non-uniform random states, Â ˆB(t) HA[ ψ ˆB(t) ψ ] = Tr{ˆB(t)ˆρ} HV[ ψ ˆB(t) ψ ] Tr{ˆB 2 (t)ˆρ} d eff d eff : inverse of the largest eigenvalue of ˆρ, interpreted as effective dimension Very many different pure states exhibit very similar dynamics of expectation values

Typicality in formulas correlation functions ψ := ˆρd ω : taylored, non-uniform random states, Â Ĉ(t) := 1 2 (ˆB(t)ˆB + ˆBˆB(t)) HA[ ψ Ĉ(t) ψ ] = Tr{Ĉ(t)ˆρ} HV[ ψ Ĉ(t) ψ ] Tr{Ĉ2 (t)ˆρ} d eff What to do practically? Compute ψ(t) := e iĥt/ ˆρd ω, ψ (t) := e iĥt/ ˆB ˆρd ω ψ(t) ˆB ψ(t) Tr{ˆB(t)ˆρ} Re[ ψ(t) ˆB ψ (t) ] Tr{ 1 2 (ˆB(t)ˆB+ˆBˆB(t))ˆρ} If ˆρ is of exponential form, e.g., ˆρ e β(ĥ Ē)2 α(ˆb B) 2 or ˆρ e βĥ αˆb than everything can be done based on pure state propagation

Spin transport in the anisotropic Heisenberg chain (PRL., 112, 1261, (214) ) Linear response conductivity from current autocorrelation function here: infinite temperature, i.e., ˆρ ˆ1, ˆB Ĵ C(t) Tr{Ĵ(t)Ĵ} C(t) / J 2.1.5 [34,36] =.5 =1. =1.5 norm (a.u.) (a) L=33 (β=) [t 1,t 2 ] 1-1 (a) =1. (β=) t J 1 C(t) / J 2 C(t) / J 2 1-2 1-1 1-2 L (b) =1.5 (β=) 1-3 1 2 t J L=18 (ED) L=18 L=2 L=22 L=24 L=26 L=28 L=3 (k=) L=32 (k=) L=33 (k=) tdmrg C(t 1,t 2 ) / J 2 C(t 1,t 2 ) / J 2.5 [2,21] [35] fit =.5 =1. =1.5 even odd (b) Drude weight (β=) 1/3 1/2 1/1 1/L (β=) Bethe Ansatz lower bound.1 ED, fit RK, L=3 RK, L.5 tdmrg.5 1 1.5 anisotropy

Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) ETH: Eigenstates of some Hamiltonian Ĥ that are close in energy feature expectation values of some observable ˆB that are close to each other. E n E m n ˆB n m ˆB m Jochen s formulation: Eigenstates belong to the set of typical states If ETH applies: - Expecation values from microncanonical ensembles are close to expecation values of individual eigenstates - Initial state independent equilibration: ˆB(t) = n,m ρ nmb mne i(en Em) t If the oscillating terms behave like white noise for τ large enough ˆB(τ) = n ρ nnb nn ETH B nn But does ETH apply? Have to check by exact diagonalization, or...

ETH check for the Heisenberg ladder (Phys. Rev. Lett., 112, 1343, (214)) Â := ˆx 2 : width of the magnetization distribution ˆρ e α(ĥ U)2 Ā := n ρ nna nn ψ Â ψ Σ 2 + Ā2 := n ρ nna 2 nn Re[ ψ(τ) Â ψ (τ) ] A nn A nn A nn 6 3 6 3 6 3 (a) L=7 (b) L=9 (c) L=1 ED A±Σ -4-2 2 U / J A (d) J J L L d=2 2L Σ 3 2 1 L=7.3 t J 18 L=8.2 (d eff ) -1/2 ETH applies! t 1.1 L=9 L=1 6 γ(t) Σ scales approx like Ĥ was a random matrix.

The End more people involved in this: R. Steinigeweg, A. Khodja, H. Niemeyer, D. Schmidtke, C. Gogolin... Thank you for your attention! The talk itself as well as the mentioned papers may be found on our webpage.