Solution Set Two. 1 Problem #1: Projectile Motion Cartesian Coordinates Polar Coordinates... 3

Similar documents
Physics 351, Spring 2015, Homework #6. Due at start of class, Friday, February 27, 2015

ESM 3124 Intermediate Dynamics 2012, HW6 Solutions. (1 + f (x) 2 ) We can first write the constraint y = f(x) in the form of a constraint

is conserved, calculating E both at θ = 0 and θ = π/2 we find that this happens for a value ω = ω given by: 2g

P321(b), Assignement 1

Marion and Thornton. Tyler Shendruk October 1, Hamilton s Principle - Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics.

Physics 351 Wednesday, February 14, 2018

Question 1: A particle starts at rest and moves along a cycloid whose equation is. 2ay y a

Phys 7221, Fall 2006: Midterm exam

Question 1: Spherical Pendulum

Distance travelled time taken and if the particle is a distance s(t) along the x-axis, then its instantaneous speed is:

Assignment 2. Goldstein 2.3 Prove that the shortest distance between two points in space is a straight line.

Physics 351, Spring 2017, Homework #2. Due at start of class, Friday, January 27, 2017

CP1 REVISION LECTURE 3 INTRODUCTION TO CLASSICAL MECHANICS. Prof. N. Harnew University of Oxford TT 2017

Classical Mechanics Comprehensive Exam Solution

Mechanics Lecture Notes

Physics 106a, Caltech 16 October, Lecture 5: Hamilton s Principle with Constraints. Examples

SOLUTIONS, PROBLEM SET 11

Columbia University Department of Physics QUALIFYING EXAMINATION

PHY321 Homework Set 10

Classical Mechanics Ph.D. Qualifying Examination. 8 January, :00 to 12:00

Physics 351, Spring 2015, Homework #7. Due at start of class, Friday, March 3, 2017

Physics 106a, Caltech 4 December, Lecture 18: Examples on Rigid Body Dynamics. Rotating rectangle. Heavy symmetric top

Physics 351, Spring 2015, Homework #7. Due at start of class, Friday, March 6, 2015

M2A2 Problem Sheet 3 - Hamiltonian Mechanics

28. Pendulum phase portrait Draw the phase portrait for the pendulum (supported by an inextensible rod)

Classical Mechanics Review (Louisiana State University Qualifier Exam)

Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics (Symon Chapter Nine)

COMPLETE ALL ROUGH WORKINGS IN THE ANSWER BOOK AND CROSS THROUGH ANY WORK WHICH IS NOT TO BE ASSESSED.

Two dimensional oscillator and central forces

Solution Set Five. 2 Problem #2: The Pendulum of Doom Equation of Motion Simple Pendulum Limit Visualization...

Constrained motion and generalized coordinates

Lecture 17 - Gyroscopes

Problem Set 5 Solution

Mechanics Departmental Exam Last updated November 2013

Homework 1. Due Thursday, January 21

STEP Support Programme. Mechanics STEP Questions

Problem Goldstein 2-12

Physics 351, Spring 2015, Homework #5. Due at start of class, Friday, February 20, 2015 Course info is at positron.hep.upenn.

PHYSICS 311: Classical Mechanics Final Exam Solution Key (2017)

The Restricted 3-Body Problem

Homework 1. Due whatever day you decide to have the homework session.

PHY 5246: Theoretical Dynamics, Fall September 28 th, 2015 Midterm Exam # 1

Rotational motion problems

PHYSICS 221, FALL 2009 EXAM #1 SOLUTIONS WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2009

Assignments VIII and IX, PHYS 301 (Classical Mechanics) Spring 2014 Due 3/21/14 at start of class

Goldstein Problem 2.17 (3 rd ed. # 2.18)

Lecture Notes for PHY 405 Classical Mechanics

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics. Final Examination December 17, 2004

Projectile Motion and 2-D Dynamics

Problem 1: Lagrangians and Conserved Quantities. Consider the following action for a particle of mass m moving in one dimension

Classical Mechanics. FIG. 1. Figure for (a), (b) and (c). FIG. 2. Figure for (d) and (e).

Physics 235 Chapter 7. Chapter 7 Hamilton's Principle - Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Dynamics

Physics 351, Spring 2017, Homework #12. Due at start of class, Friday, April 14, 2017

Physics 351, Spring 2015, Final Exam.

Exam Question 6/8 (HL/OL): Circular and Simple Harmonic Motion. February 1, Applied Mathematics: Lecture 7. Brendan Williamson.

HW3 Physics 311 Mechanics

Lecture 4. Alexey Boyarsky. October 6, 2015

the EL equation for the x coordinate is easily seen to be (exercise)

Symmetries 2 - Rotations in Space

2 We alsohave a second constant of the motion, the energy, H = 2 (M + m) _X 2 +mr cos # _X _ #+ 2 mr2 _ # 2 mgr cos # = constant : For small displacem

Chapter 9 Notes. x cm =

Physics 2211 M Quiz #2 Solutions Summer 2017

Motion under the Influence of a Central Force

Lecture 13 REVIEW. Physics 106 Spring What should we know? What should we know? Newton s Laws

Homework 1. Due Tuesday, January 29.

Consider a particle in 1D at position x(t), subject to a force F (x), so that mẍ = F (x). Define the kinetic energy to be.

Constraints. Noninertial coordinate systems

Chapter 14 Periodic Motion

PC 1141 : AY 2012 /13

Assignment 2. Tyler Shendruk October 8, Hamilton s Principle - Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics.

First Year Physics: Prelims CP1 Classical Mechanics: DR. Ghassan Yassin

Problem Set 2 Solution

Circular motion. Aug. 22, 2017

Q1. A) 46 m/s B) 21 m/s C) 17 m/s D) 52 m/s E) 82 m/s. Ans: v = ( ( 9 8) ( 98)

Physics H7A, Fall 2011 Homework 6 Solutions

HW 6 Mathematics 503, Mathematical Modeling, CSUF, June 24, 2007

PHY6426/Fall 07: CLASSICAL MECHANICS HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #1 due by 9:35 a.m. Wed 09/05 Instructor: D. L. Maslov Rm.

Physics H7A, Fall 2011 Homework 4 Solutions

Forces of Constraint & Lagrange Multipliers

1 Motion of a single particle - Linear momentum, work and energy principle

Physics 202 Laboratory 3. Root-Finding 1. Laboratory 3. Physics 202 Laboratory

Physics 351, Spring 2017, Homework #3. Due at start of class, Friday, February 3, 2017

21.60 Worksheet 8 - preparation problems - question 1:

Newton s Laws of Motion, Energy and Oscillations

The Principle of Least Action

Circular Motion Dynamics

Chapter 4. Oscillatory Motion. 4.1 The Important Stuff Simple Harmonic Motion

06. Lagrangian Mechanics II

Physics 8, Fall 2011, equation sheet work in progress

Kinematics (special case) Dynamics gravity, tension, elastic, normal, friction. Energy: kinetic, potential gravity, spring + work (friction)

Solutions. 8th Annual Boston Area Undergraduate Physics Competition April 27, 2002

MOTION IN TWO OR THREE DIMENSIONS

Two-Body Problem. Central Potential. 1D Motion

PH1104/PH114S MECHANICS

Exam II: Solutions. UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA Department of Physics and Astronomy. PH 125 / LeClair Spring 2009

Figure 1 Answer: = m

4.1 Important Notes on Notation

Problem Set 2 Solution

Lecture 8: Ch Sept 2018

Stellar Dynamics and Structure of Galaxies

Transcription:

: Solution Set Two Northwestern University, Classical Mechanics Classical Mechanics, Third Ed.- Goldstein October 7, 2015 Contents 1 Problem #1: Projectile Motion. 2 1.1 Cartesian Coordinates.................................... 2 1.2 Polar Coordinates...................................... 3 2 Goldstein 1.21. 4 2.1 Determining Coordinates.................................. 4 2.2 Finding the Lagrange Equations.............................. 4 2.3 Obtaining the First Integral................................ 5 3 Goldstein 2.18. 7 3.1 Determining Lagrange Equations and Conserved Quantities............... 7 3.2 Finding Equilibrium Points................................. 8 4 Goldstein 3.11. 9 5 Problem #5: Particle Motion in Potentials. 11 1

1 Problem #1: Projectile Motion. Derive the equations of motion for a particle moving in two dimensions under a uniform, vertical gravitational field using the Lagrangian method, in Cartesian and polar coordinates. 1.1 Cartesian Coordinates. The Lagrangian for two dimensional projectile motion in Cartesian coordinates is simply, L = T x + T y U grav = 1 2 mv2 mgy = 1 2 m(ẋ2 + ẏ 2 ) mgy, (1) where m is the mass of the particle and g is the gravitational acceleration. The coordinates are chosen following the convention the x is the horizontal coordinate and y is the vertical. Note that the Lagrangian is cyclic in x, which says dl dẋ is a conserved quantity, the linear momentum in the x direction. The Lagrange equations in these coordinates are, ( ) = 0 (2) dẋ ( ) dẏ dy = 0, (3) due to x being a cyclic coordinate. Substituting in the Lagrangian from Equation 1 and performing the derivatives yields, mẍ = 0 (4) mÿ = mg, (5) note the m cancels from each equation. These can be integrated once to get velocities as functions of time, ẋ = v x0 (6) ẏ = gt + v y0, (7) where v i0 is the initial velocity in the i th direction. Upon the second integration, the positions as functions of time are given by, x(t) = x 0 + v x0 t (8) y(t) = y 0 + v y0 t 1 2 gt2, (9) where x 0 and y 0 are the initial horizontal and vertical positions, respectively, which are the classic Newtonian result. Page 2 of 13

1.2 Polar Coordinates. In polar coordinates the Lagrangian has the same form as Equation 1 but the components x and y, and their first derivatives have the form, { { x = r cos θ ẋ = ṙ cos θ r ; θ sin θ y = r sin θ ẏ = ṙ sin θ + r θ, (10) cos θ which gives the velocity squared to be, v 2 = ẋ 2 + ẏ 2 = ṙ 2 + r 2 θ2, (11) by noting that the cross terms (ones that contain ṙ and θ) cancel and using the trigonometric identity sin 2 θ + cos 2 θ = 1. Substituting v 2 and y from Equations 11 and 10 into Equation 1 gives the Lagrangian, L = 1 2 mṙ2 + 1 2 mr2 θ2 mgr sin θ, (12) which is not cyclic in any coordinate, and therefore has no conserved quantities. The Lagrange equations in these coordinates are, ( ) dṙ dr = 0 (13) ( dl which gives the equations of motion, which in a simpler form are, d d θ ) dθ = 0, (14) m r = mr θ 2 mg sin θ (15) (2mrṙ θ) + (mr 2 θ) = mgr cos θ, (16) r = r θ 2 g sin θ (17) θ = g r θ cos θ 2 r ṙ, (18) and can be integrated to get the coordinates r and θ as a function of time. Page 3 of 13

2 Goldstein 1.21. Two point masses, m 1 and m 2 are connected by a massless, inextensible string of length l. The mass m 1 rests on the surface of a smooth table, with the string passing through a hole in the center of the table so m 2 hangs suspended. Consider the motion only until m 1 reaches the hole. 2.1 Determining Coordinates. The mass on the table m 1 is free to move on the two dimensional surface of the table, where the hole is defined as the origin. Additionally, the table surface is defined as the zero level of potential energy. The coordinates that describe the motion of m 1 are standard polar coordinates, r and θ, while m 2 only moves in one direction and can be described by the coordinate y, the distance from the table. The table surface is set to y = 0, and y is defined to be positive below the table. Therefore at a positive y position, the potential energy will be negative. Using these coordinates, and the result in Equation 11 for v 1, the velocity of m 1, it is easy to find the kinetic and potential energies, T = 1 2 m 1v 2 1 + 1 2 m 2v 2 2 = 1 2 m 1(ṙ 2 + r 2 θ2 ) + 1 2 m 2ẏ 2 (19) U = m 2 gy, (20) but by imposing a constraint on the coordinate y due to the length of the string, it can be elimated as follows, With this substitution the energies become, y = l r (21) ẏ = ṙ. (22) T = 1 2 m 1(ṙ 2 + r 2 θ2 ) + 1 2 m 2( ṙ) 2 = 1 2 (m 1 + m 2 )ṙ 2 + 1 2 m 1r 2 θ2 (23) U = (m 2 gl m 2 gr), (24) but the constant term in U can be neglected when writing the Lagrangian, because the useful information comes from taking derivatives. 2.2 Finding the Lagrange Equations. The Lagrangian is, L = 1 2 (m 1 + m 2 )ṙ 2 + 1 2 m 1r 2 θ2 m 2 gr + m 2 gl, (25) which is cyclic in θ, corresponding to conservation of angular momentum. This gives Lagrange equations of the form, ( ) dṙ dr = 0 (26) ( ) d θ = 0, (27) Page 4 of 13

which when substituting in Equation 25 and performing the derivatives gives the equations, ( ) ( ) m1 r = r m 1 + m m2 g 2 m 1 + m 2 (28) d [m 1r 2 θ] = 0. (29) By noting that m 1 r 2 θ must equal a constant, call it l for angular momentum, θ can be eliminated from Equation 28, ( ) ( ) m1 l 2 ( ) ( m2 l 2 ) 1 r = r m 1 + m 2 m 1 r 2 g = m 1 + m 2 m 1 (m 1 + m 2 ) r 3 m 2 g (m 1 + m 2 ). (30) which can be solved for ṙ by taking the first integral. The equation of motion, Equation 30, can be rewritten as, ( ) l 2 (m 1 + m 2 ) r = m 1 r 3 m 2 g. (31) 2.3 Obtaining the First Integral. In order to solve Equation 31, an effective potential, V eff is defined to be the the sum of the centrifugal term and true potential term of the Lagrangian. In polar coordinates for this potential, the effective potential is, V eff m 2 gr 1 2 m 1r 2 θ2 = m 2 gr 1 ( ) l 2 2 m 1r 2 m 1 r 2 = m 2 gr 1 l 2 2 m 1 r 2, (32) then Equation 31 can be written as, (m 1 + m 2 ) r = dv eff dr. (33) A factor of integration 2ṙ can be applied to Equation 33 making it, ( ) dve ff dr 2(m 1 + m 2 ) rṙ = 2 dr (m 1 + m 2 ) d [ṙ2 ] = 2 dv eff, (34) by noting the time derivative of ṙ 2 is 2ṙ r. Then integrating each side with respect to time yields, d dve ff (m 1 + m 2 ) [ṙ2 ] = 2, (35) which gives an equation for the radial velocity, 1 2 (m 1 + m 2 )ṙ 2 = V eff + C, (36) where C is a constant of integration, which will be determined by imposing initial conditions on the system. Notice that by moving the V eff term to the other side of the equation yields an expression for total energy, which is equal to a constant and therefore conserved. Substituting in Equation 32 and solving for the radial velocity as a function of r, we obtain the first integral of the equation of motion, ṙ(r) = ± l 2 m 1 (m 1 + m 2 ) r 2 2m 2g (m 1 + m 2 ) r + C, (37) Page 5 of 13

the constant C was changed to C because it absorbed the factor of two and the sum of the masses while solving for ṙ. The two solutions result from taking the square root of ṙ, and allows selection of the result which has physical meaning. This function tells you how fast m 2 is falling as a function of how close m 1 is to the hole on the table, at a given angular momentum. The constant is necessary to interpret the physical meaning of Equation 37, and to ensure solutions make sense. Consider the initial condition that the system started at rest, with m 1 is located a distance r 0 away from the origin, { ṙ(r 0 ) = 0 (38) l = 0. Under these conditions, Equation 37 can be solved for C, giving C = 2m 2g m 1 + m 2 r 0, (39) which after plugging in, gives the final form for the radial velocity equation, l ṙ(r) = ± 2 m 1 (m 1 + m 2 ) r 2 + 2m 2g (m 1 + m 2 ) (r 0 r). (40) This equation can be verified by investigating the scenario set as the initial conditions, no angular momentum and no initial velocity. Intuitively, we know the mass on the table should move towards the hole because of gravity pulling down the suspended mass, which implies ṙ < 0. Additionally, r < r 0 for any t > 0, because the mass on the table is moving towards the hole. Using these facts, it is easy to see the kernel of the square root is a positive number, which gives a real solution. The negative solution would be selected because of the physical restrictions of the scenario. For any value of r, there is a critical angular momentum l 0 for which the radius of m 1 s orbit around the hole will not increase or decrease, ṙ = 0. This implies m 2 maintains a constant distance from the table. If the angular momentum exceeds l 0, the distance m 1 is from the hole will increase. This critical angular momentum maintains a constant distance of both masses from the hole, given by, l 2 0 m 1 (m 1 + m 2 ) r 2 = 2m 2g (m 1 + m 2 ) (r 0 r) l 0 = 2m 1 m 2 gr 2 (r r 0 ). (41) Clearly this can only happen for r values larger than the initial distance of m 1 to the hole. Page 6 of 13

3 Goldstein 2.18. A point mass is constrained to move on a massless hoop of radius a, fixed in a vertical plane and rotating about its vertical symmetry axis with constant angular speed ω. The only external forces on this system arise from gravity. 3.1 Determining Lagrange Equations and Conserved Quantities. The origin of the coordinate system will be located at the center of the hoop, used in polar coordinates, with a fixed value of r, the radial coordinate. Let θ be the polar angle, the angle the mass makes along the hoop, and φ be the azimuthal angle, the angle face of the hoop makes around in its rotation, such that ω = dφ. In a Cartesian coordinate system, each coordinate and velocity can be defined as, x = a sin θ cos φ ẋ = a[( θ cos θ) cos φ sin θ( φ sin φ)] y = a sin θ sin φ ; ẏ = a[( θ cos θ) sin φ + sin θ( φ cos φ)]. (42) z = a cos φ ż = a θ sin θ The Lagrangian is easily written down in a Cartesian coordinate system, L = 1 2 mv2 mgy = 1 2 m(x2 + y 2 + z 2 ) mgy, (43) but substituting in Equation 42, the Lagrangian in the desired coordinates is obtained, L = 1 2 m[a2 ( θ 2 + φ 2 sin 2 θ)] mga cos θ, (44) by noting that in ẋ 2 and θ 2, the cross terms (terms with ṙ θ) cancel when added. Also note during the calculation of v 2, the trigonometric identity sin 2 θ + cos 2 θ = 1 was used three times. This gives the Lagrange equations, ( ) d ( θ d φ dθ = 0 = d ma2 θ ma 2 φ2 cos θ sin θ + mga sin θ (45) ) dφ = 0 = d ma2 φ sin 2 θ, (46) and the equations of motion upon substitution of ω = dφ and noting it is a constant become, θ = ω 2 cos θ sin θ g sin θ a (47) cst = mr 2 ω sin 2 θ. (48) The second equation of motion represents a constant of motion, the quantity mr 2 ω sin 2 θ is conserved. The Hamiltonian is also conserved, because the Lagrangian does not explicitly depend on time. Page 7 of 13

3.2 Finding Equilibrium Points. Again, an effective potential V eff is defined to be the sum of the true potential and centrifugal terms of the Lagrangian. In spherical coordinates, for this potential, the effective potential is, V eff mga cos θ 1 2 ma2 ω 2 sin 2 θ. (49) Minimizing this potential with respect to θ will give the values of θ for which equilibrium points exits. Physically, these equilibrium points are locations along the hoop the mass can sit at which, for a given ω, will remain without sliding around the hoop in the ˆθ direction. To minimize V eff, it is differentiated with respect to θ and solved for θ when the derivative equals zero, dv eff dθ = 0 = ma 2 ω 2 sin θ cos θ + mga sin θ (50) 0 = aω 2 cos θ + g (51) cos θ = g aω 2, (52) which can only be satisfied for π 2 < θ 3π 2. Define a critical angular speed ω 0 = g a, so that, cos θ = ω2 0 ω 2. (53) For angular velocities greater than ω 0, the above equation is solvable and there exist θ s for stable orbits that are not located at the bottom of the hoop, θ = π. When ω = ω 0 the ratio is 1, which corresponds to the only stable location for the mass to remain is the bottom of the hoop. For ω < ω 0 the ratio in Equation 53 is greater than one and the equation is not solvable. When this is the case, there is no global minimum of the V eff function in the domain of possible θ values, π 2 < θ 3π 2, the bottom half of the hoop. The minimum, then, is the location at which cos θ takes its minimum value. However, in solving Equation 50, there is another solution, sin θ = 0. Which happens (in the domain of the possible θ values) at θ = π, which is also when cos θ takes its minimum value. This implies for ω < ω 0, the only stable point along the hoop, is at θ = π, the bottom of the hoop. Page 8 of 13

4 Goldstein 3.11. Two particles move about each other in circular orbits under the influence of gravitational forces with a period τ. Their motion is suddenly stopped at a given instant in time, and they are then released and allowed to fall into each other. Prove that they collide after a time τ/(4 2). The Lagrangian for a system of two particles, in the center of mass frame, where the only forces present are the interactions of the particles with each other reduces to an equivalent one-body problem. This formula is given by Goldstein Equation 3.6, L = 1 2 µ(ṙ2 + r 2 θ2 ) U(r) (54) = 1 ( ) 2 µ(ṙ2 + r 2 Gm1 θ2 m 2 ), (55) r where r is the distance between the masses, and µ = m 1m 2 m 1 +m 2, the reduced mass. This Lagrangian is cyclic in θ which implies angular momentum is conserved, as shown in the Lagrange equations, d ( dl dṙ ) ( ) dl d d θ dr = 0 = µ r [µr θ 2 Gm 1 m 2 r 2 ] (56) = 0 = d µr2 θ. (57) The conserved angular momentum is l = µr 2 θ. The angular velocity of a circular orbit with a given period is θ = 2π τ, which when substituted into Equation 56 and simplified, yields, ( ) 2π 2 r = r G(m 1 + m 2 )r 2. (58) τ While the two masses are orbiting their common center of mass, the orbit is stable so the distance between the masses doesn t change: r = ṙ = 0, on this orbit the separation of the masses is r 0. Solving Equation 58 under these conditions gives, Once the orbits are stopped, θ = 0, so Equation 56 reduces to, r 3 0 = G(m 1 + m 2 )τ 2 4π 2. (59) r = G(m 1 + m 2 )r 2, (60) by dividing by µ. Multiplying this equation by an integrating factor, 2ṙ, becomes, 2r r = 2G(m 1 + m 2 )( ṙr 2 ) d [ṙ2 ] = 2G(m 1 + m 2 ) d [r 1 ], (61) taking the integral with respect to time gives an equation for the radial speed as a function of r, ṙ 2 = 2G(m 1 + m 2 )r 1 + C, (62) where C is a constant of integration. This constant can be calculated by noting that at r = r 0 the radial velocity, ṙ is zero, ṙ 2 (r 0 ) = 0 = 2G(m 1 + m 2 ) r 0 + C, (63) Page 9 of 13

and solving for C. This makes the radial velocity, Equation 62 into, ṙ(r) 2 = 2G(m 1 +m 2 )r 1 2G(m [ 1 + m 2 ) 1 = 2G(m 1 +m 2 ) r 0 r 1 ] [ ] r0 r = 2G(m 1 +m 2 ), (64) r 0 rr 0 from this we can get an expression for time by noting ṙ = dr, then inverting and integrating both sides, 0 t = r 0 dr dr = 1 0 rr0 dr. (65) 2G(m 1 + m 2 ) r 0 r 0 r The negative sign comes from taking the square root of ṙ 2, since the masses are attracted to each other r is decreasing as a function of time. Evaluating this integral in Mathematica yields a value for the time of collapse, t = 1 2G(m 1 + m 2 ) πr 3/2 0 2. (66) Plugging in the expression for r 0, Equation 59, gives the expression for the time from when the circular orbit stops and the masses collide, t = π G(m1 + m 2 )τ 2 1 2 4π 2 2G(m1 + m 2 ) = τ 4 2, (67) which is the value it should be, as asserted in the beginning. Page 10 of 13

5 Problem #5: Particle Motion in Potentials. One can think of motion on the curve surface as motion in an effective potential U(r), where different physical situations correspond to different potentials. Consider the potential energy function U(r) = U 0 1 2 κr2 exp[ r 2 /R 2 ], (68) where U 0, κ, and R are all constants. The force a particle feels under this potential is the negative gradient of the potential. For this potential, the force is F = U = r Uˆr + 1 r θ U ˆθ + 1 r sin θ φ U ˆφ = κr exp[ r 2 /R 2 ]ˆr, (69) which does not depend on the constant U 0. Physically, this is because one is free to arbitrarily set the level of zero potential. Raising or lowering the potential by a constant value has no effects on the dynamics of a particle subject to that potential. Mathematically, this is true because constants disappear under differentiation. See Figures 1, 2 and 3 for a vizualization of this potential and the effects of varying κ and R on the potential. A conservative force does the same amount of work moving a particle from a to b regardless of choice of path. Which implies the work done along any closed path is zero. Consider a circle with point a and point b separated by an angle θ = π in a vector force field F. The work done in moving a particle from a to b along the contour of the circle is W a b = b a F dr, (70) while the work done moving the particle back from b to a along the other half of the circle is W b a = a b F dr = W a b. (71) The particle has now moved along a contour C which bounds the surface of the circle S. The work in moving a particle around C from a through b and back to a is just the sum of the work done in moving the particle across each path, W C = F dr = W a b + W b a, (72) C which is clearly zero, which was stated above. Using Stokes Theorem on Equation 72, 0 = F dr = ( F)dS, (73) C which states the curl of a conservative force s vector field is zero (irrotational vector field). The curl of a gradient is always zero if the first and second derivatives are continuous 1, so by finding the force by taking the gradient of a potential guarantees a conservative force. More concisely, if a scalar potential energy function that describes the force exists, the force is conservative by definition. Therefore, the formulation of the question ensures that the force given by Equation 69 is conservative. S 1 Nykamp DQ, The curl of a gradient is zero. From Math Insight. http://mathinsight.org/curl gradient zero Page 11 of 13

The potential energy of a particle in this potential in a small region around the origin, ρ, such that ρ R can be found by Taylor Expanding the potential around the origin. Equation 68 becomes, to second order, where the derivatives are given by, { U (r) = κr exp[ r 2 /R 2 ] U(r) = U(0) + U (0)r + 1 2 U (0)r 2 + O(r 3 ), (74) U (r) = κ exp[ r 2 /R 2 ] 2κ r2 exp[ r 2 /R 2 ] R 2 This makes Equation 76 into, ; { U (0) = 0 U (0) = κ. (75) U(r) = U 0 1 2 κr2 + 1 2 κr2 + O(r 3 ), (76) which has the form of a harmonic oscillator, V HO = 1 2 kρ2 + V 0. This form is valid for the small neighborhood around the origin, ρ x ρ. If a particle of mass m is moving in this potential, it has the Lagrangian, which gives the equation of motion, L = 1 2 mẋ2 1 2 κx2 V 0, (77) ẍ = κ m x, (78) which can be solved for velocity, v, by imposing initial conditions on the particle s motion. For convenience, define ω = κ m. At time t = 0, the particle passes through the origin with a speed v 0. The velocity as a function of displacement can be found by performing the first integration. Some manipulation of Equation 78 yields dẋ = ω2 x = dẋ dx dx = dẋ dxẋ, (79) with some rearranging and taking an integral on both sides, this becomes v(ρ) ρ ẋdẋ = ω 2 xdx 1 v 0 0 2 (v(x)2 v0) 2 = 1 2 ω2 ρ 2, (80) which yields the equation for velocity as a function of displacement ρ, v(ρ) = ± v0 2 ω2 ρ 2. (81) The two solutions make sense because for any given displacement the particle can be travelling in either direction. Figure 1: Shape of the potential in two dimensional space. Variables were changed from r to x and y such that r 2 = x 2 + y 2. The U 0 parameter was set to zero, because it does not change the shape of the potential, just provides an offset. Both parameters κ and R were set to 1 for this plot. Page 12 of 13

(a) Plot showing the effects of varying κ from 4 to 4 with integer steps. The other parameters were set to U 0 = 0 and R = 1. Positive and negative values of κ were chosen because it will change the potential from being repulsive to attractive if κ < 0 is chosen. (b) Plot showing the effects of varying R from 1 to 5 with integer steps. The other parameters were set to U 0 = 0 and κ = 1. Only positive values of R were chosen because it only appears in the potential as R 2, so ±R has the same effect. Figure 2: Diagrams showing the effects of varying κ and R, respectively. Figure 3: Shape of the potential in parameter space, for r = 1 and U 0 = 0. Parameter ranges are 4 κ 4 and 1 R 5. The Mathematica code to generate these plots is as follows: U[r_, \[Kappa]_, R_] := - (1/2) \[Kappa] R^2 Exp[-r^2/R^2]; Plot3D[U[Sqrt[x^2 + y^2], 1, 1], {x, -2, 2}, {y, -2, 2}, AxesLabel -> {"x", "y", "U(r)"}] \[Kappa]List = Table[U[r, \[Kappa], 1], {\[Kappa], -4, 4}]; \[Kappa]Labels = Table["\[Kappa] = " <> ToString[\[Kappa]], {\[Kappa], -4, 4}]; Plot[\[Kappa]List, {r, -2, 2}, PlotLegends -> \[Kappa]Labels, AxesLabel -> {"r", "U(r)"}] RList = Table[U[r, 1, R], {R, 1, 5}]; RLabels = Table["R = " <> ToString[R], {R, 1, 5}]; Plot[RList, {r, -8, 8}, PlotLegends -> RLabels, AxesLabel -> {"r", "U(r)"}] Plot3D[U[2, k, R], {k, -4, 4}, {R, 1, 5}, AxesLabel -> {"\[Kappa]", "R", "U(r)"}] Page 13 of 13