Clinical Implementation of the IPEM 2003 Code of Practice for Electron Dosimetry

Similar documents
ABSORBED DOSE TO WATER MEASUREMENTS IN HIGH ENERGY ELECTRON BEAMS USING DIFFERENT PLANE PARALLEL CHAMBERS *

NACP-02 perturbation correction factors for the NPL primary standard of absorbed dose to water in high energy electron beams

Dosimetry: Electron Beams

Reference Dosimetry for Megavoltage Therapy Beams: Electrons

Updating reference dosimetry a decade after TG-51

) for Varian TrueBeam high-dose-rate therapy beams

Improvements to the UK Primary Standard Therapy Level Electron Beam Calorimeter

8/2/2012 UPDATING TG-51. When will it end? Part 1 - photon addendum. What are these updates? Photons: Electrons: More widespread revision required

N. E. Ipe*, K. E. Rosser, C. J. Moretti, J. W. Manning and M. J. Palmer

Radiation Dosimetry. Electron interactions with matter. Important processes in radiotherapy. Contents. Alun Beddoe

Referensdosimetri. Crister Ceberg Medical Radiation Physics Lund University Sweden

High-Energy Photon Beam Therapy Dosimetry with Ionisation Chambers

Instrumentation for Verification of Dose

Code of Practice for the Absorbed Dose Determination in High Energy Photon and Electron Beams

Comparison between TG-51 and TRS-398: Electron Contamination Effect on Photon Beam Quality Specification.

PRIMARY STANDARDS of AIR KERMA for 60 CO and X-RAYS & ABSORBED DOSE in PHOTON and ELECTRON BEAMS. Malcolm McEwen

Implementation of the IAEA-AAPM Code of Practice for the dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy

Instrumentation for Verification of Dose

Air Kerma Primary Standard: Experimental and. Simulation Studies on Cs-137. J. Cardoso, L. Santos, C. Oliveira

Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors

Principles of applied dosimetry - illustrated by ionometry. Lesson FYSKJM4710 Eirik Malinen

Chapter 9: Calibration of Photon and Electron Beams

NPL s progress towards absorbed dose standards for proton beams

High dose-per-pulse electron beam dosimetry A model to correct for the ion recombination in the Advanced Markus ionization chamber

Comparison of Primary Doses Obtained in Three 6 MV Photon Beams Using a Small Attenuator

TITLE: Air Kerma Primary Standard: Experimental and Simulation Studies on Cs-137

FOREWORD In 1987 the IAEA published a Code of Practice entitled Absorbed Dose Determination in Photon and Electron Beams: An International Code of

A Measuring System with Recombination Chamber for Photoneutron Dosimetry at Medical Linear Accelerators

Diamond detector in absorbed dose measurements in high-energy linear accelerator photon and electron beams

CHARACTERISTICS OF DEGRADED ELECTRON BEAMS PRODUCED BY NOVAC7 IORT ACCELERATOR

Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration

Larry A. DeWerd, PhD, FAAPM UW ADCL & Dept. Medical Physics University of Wisconsin

7. a XV-2 high spatial resolution lm detector (Kodak). Important parameters of these detectors are given in Table1. The ionization chambers and the di

Evaluation of different methods for determining the magnitude of initial recombination in ionization chambers

STANDARD WATER PHANTOM BACKSCATTER FACTORS FOR MEDIUM ENERGY X-RAYS

Progress in calculations of k Q for TG-51

Study of the influence of phantom material and size on the calibration of ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water

The EPOM shift of cylindrical ionization chambers - a status report Hui Khee Looe 1, Ndimofor Chofor 1, Dietrich Harder 2, Björn Poppe 1

M [scale units/s] of the system

COMPARISON OF ABSORBED DOSE TO AIR CALIBRATION FACTORS FOR A PARALLEL PLATE IONIZATION CHAMBER*

Electron therapy Class 2: Review questions

ABSTRACT. Keywords: Megavoltage, dosimetry, TG51 protocol, TG21 protocol, parallel-plate chambers, crosscomparison. INTRODUCTION

ELECTRON INTERACTIONS

Photon-beams monitor-unit calculations

Optimization of microionization chambers for small-field reference dosimetry

Comparison of the air kerma standards for 137 Cs and 60 Co gamma-ray beams between the IAEA and the NIST. Ronaldo Minniti 1 and Ladislav Czap 2

An introduction to IAEA TRS-483

Gerhard Stucki, Sandor VörösV

General Overview of Gas Filled Detectors

1.1.4 What are the differences between the Varian 600C and the Siemens KD2?

KCDB-Identifiers: EURAMET.RI(I)-K1.2 / EURAMET.RI(I)-K4.2 / EURAMET.RI(I)-K5.1. Pilot laboratory: BEV (AT) Andreas Steurer 1), Wilhelm Tiefenboeck

factors for NE2561 ionization chambers in 3 cm x 3 cm beams of 6 MV and 10 MV photons

General characteristics of radiation dosimeters

DUAL NATURE OF RADIATION AND MATTER

ERRATA LIST AND UPDATES TO IAEA TRS-398 (2000) 1

Monte Carlo commissioning of photon beams in medical LINACS using wide-field profiles in a water phantom

R. C. Tailor and W. F. Hanson. Department of Radiation Physics. The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Houston, Texas 77030

4.1b - Cavity Theory Lecture 2 Peter R Al mond 2011 Overview of Lecture Exposure (W/e)air Exposure Exposure and and and Air Air Kerma

Composite field dosimetry

Efficiencies of Some Spherical Ion Chambers in Continuous and Pulsed Radiation: A Numerical Evaluation

Ionizing Radiation Dosimetry and Medical Physics

ESTIMATION OF 90 SCATTERING COEFFICIENT IN THE SHIELDING CALCULATION OF DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EQUIPMENT

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K4 of the absorbed dose to water standards of the METAS, Switzerland and the BIPM in 60 Co gamma radiation

ABSORBED DOSE BEAM QUALITY FACTORS FOR CYLINDRICAL ION CHAMBERS: EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION AT 6 AND 15 MV PHOTON BEAMS

Metrological traceability and specific needs in: - IR measurement for radiation protection (RP) - IR measurement for radiotherapy (RT)

Tutorial: simulating a rod pinch diode for pulsed radiography with Trak and GamBet

1 Introduction. A Monte Carlo study

Bureau International des Poids et Mesures

Determination of absorbed dose to water for 60Co by the scaling theorem. M. Boutillon and A.-M. Perroche (1)

Chapiter VII: Ionization chamber

Shielding of Ionising Radiation with the Dosimetry & Shielding Module

Contents. Charged Particles. Coulomb Interactions Elastic Scattering. Coulomb Interactions - Inelastic Scattering. Bremsstrahlung

Use of a radioactive check device for redundancy check of ionization chambers

Objectives. Tolerance Limits and Action Levels for IMRT QA. The Overall Process of IMRT Planning and Delivery. Chain of IMRT Process

pp physics, RWTH, WS 2003/04, T.Hebbeker

Radiation Dose, Biology & Risk

Monitor Unit Calculations for Photon and Electrons. AAMD Meeting Raleigh, NC October 3, John P. Gibbons Chief of Clinical Physics

Determination of contributions of scatter and distance error to the source strength of 192 Ir HDR brachytherapy source

Recombination factor dependancy of high and low dose pulsed accelerators for electron beam energies

Dosimetry and beam calibration

Comparison of the standards of air kerma of the GUM and the BIPM for 60Co 'Y rays

Heuijin Lim, Manwoo Lee, Jungyu Yi, Sang Koo Kang, Me Young Kim, Dong Hyeok Jeong

Manipulation on charged particle beam for RT benefit.

A comparison of methods for monitoring photon beam energy constancy

Chapter 8 Electron Beams: Physical and Clinical Aspects

Chapter V: Cavity theories

Comparison of the standards of air kerma of the BNM-LPRI and the BIPM for 137CS y rays

Variations in daily quality assurance dosimetry from device levelling, feet position and backscatter material

Measurement of induced radioactivity in air and water for medical accelerators

Comment on Proton beam monitor chamber calibration

Commissioning of the Beta Secondary Standard (BSS2)

Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2006), Vol. 118, No. 3, pp Advance Access publication 6 October 2005

BEAMnrc: a code to simulate radiotherapy external beam sources

Photoelectric effect

Instructions for Use for the transfer chamber and the electronic measuring device Revision 1

Non-radioactive radiation sources. Lesson FYSKJM4710 Eirik Malinen

3. Gas Detectors General introduction

8/4/2016. Determination of small field output factors, advantages and limitations of Monte Carlo simulations

Simulation Modeling in Dosimetry

Specific Accreditation Criteria Calibration ISO/IEC Annex. Ionising radiation measurements

Transcription:

Clinical Implementation of the IPEM 2003 Code of Practice for Electron Dosimetry TJ JORDAN Royal Surrey County Hospital IPEM Electron Dosimetry Working Party: + DI Thwaites, AR DuSautoy, MR McEwen, AE Nahum, A Nisbet & WG Pitchford Practical Course in Reference Dosimetry, NPL 2016

Basic Methodology Calorimeter based Absorbed Dose to Water calibration in electron beams Pictures courtesy of NPL

Basic Methodology Calorimeter based Absorbed Dose to Water calibration in electron beams Individualised parallel plate electron chamber calibration at 6 electron beam qualities based on R 50,D (depth of 50% dose) Original NPL accelerator, R 50,D : 1.97 to 6.60cm [6 to 19 MeV] LESS than the range of hospital clinical beams Elekta Clinical Linac, R 50,D : 1.6 up to 8.9*cm [4 to 22* MeV] *(not guaranteed)

Basic Methodology NPL Calibration certificate Calorimeter based Absorbed Dose to Water calibration in electron beams Individualised parallel plate electron chamber calibration at 6 electron beam qualities based on R 50,D Uses reference depth defined as Z ref = 0.6 R 50,D 0.1cm NPL determined Recombination f ion = m(dose per pulse) + c

Basic Methodology Calorimeter based Absorbed Dose to Water calibration in electron beams 100 %Depth Dose Individualised parallel plate electron chamber calibration at 7 electron beam qualities based on R 50,D Uses reference depth defined as Z ref = 0.6 R 50,D 0.1cm % Dose 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 dmax Zref NPL determined Recombination f ion = m(dose per pulse) + c 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 R50 Depth (mm)

Basic Methodology NPL Calibration certificate Calorimeter based Absorbed Dose to Water calibration in electron beams Individualised parallel plate electron chamber calibration at 7 electron beam qualities based on R 50,D Uses reference depth defined as Z ref = 0.6 R 50,D 0.1cm NPL determined Recombination f ion = m(dose per pulse) + c

Basic Methodology NPL Calibration certificate Calorimeter based Absorbed Dose to Water calibration in electron beams Individualised parallel plate electron chamber calibration at 6 electron beam qualities based on R 50,D Uses reference depth defined as Z ref = 0.6 R 50,D 0.1cm NPL determined Recombination f ion = m(dose per pulse) + c

Determination of R 50,D Measurement of Depth- Dose For photons, Dose w Air ionisation x W/e x [µ en / ] w,air [µ en / ] w,air the Mass Energy Absorption Coefficient for water to air is nearly constant with depth and relative Depth-Ionisation is assumed to Depth-Dose in water. For electrons Dose w Air ionisation x W/e x S w,air As the electron energy spectrum decreases rapidly with depth (from incident energy to 0), the Stopping Power ratio S w,air is NOT constant Depth-Ionisation curve needs renormalising at every point by S w,air ratio to be representative of a Depth-Dose curve

Sw,med Stopping Power Ratios (20MeV Electrons) 1.3 1.2 Water/Air 1.1 1 0.9 0 20 40 60 80 100 Depth (mm)

Sw,med Stopping Power Ratios (20MeV Electrons) 1.3 1.2 Water/Si Water/Air 1.1 1 0.9 0 20 40 60 80 100 Depth (mm)

Determination of R 50,D Protocol gives 3 options; Find R 50,D either from; R 50,D = 1.029 x R 50,I 0.063 cm eqn. 2.1 Use measured Depth-Ionisation curve (Need %DD curve clinically, see later) S w,air corrected Depth-Ionisation curve To produce Depth-Dose curve Directly from diode measured Depth-Ionisation curve as S w,silicon constant until deep Measure Depth-Dose directly

% DOSE Depth Dose Measurement 100 90 80 70 Si diode NACP S w,air Corr. 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 DEPTH (mm)

(corrected) NACP vs Diode: Energy Dependence 100 90 80 70 6MeV NACP 9MeV NACP 12MeV NACP 16MeV NACP 20MeV NACP % Dose 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Depth (mm) Bremsstrahlung tail

(corrected) NACP vs Diode: Consistent Error % Dose 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 6MeV NACP 9MeV NACP 12MeV NACP 16MeV NACP 20MeV NACP Diode 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Depth (mm)

Effective Point of Measurement, P eff An air ionisation chamber introduces an air bubble into the water phantom The effective point of measurement is where the fluence is equivalent to the fluence in the undisturbed medium For a parallel plate chamber P eff is just inside the front window [For a cylindrical chamber it is around 0.6 x Internal Radius forward of the physical centre]

Effective Point of Measurement, P eff ROOS 1.18x 1mm NACP FARMER 0.125cc DIODE 1.7x 0.6mm 1.8mm 1.7mm 0.5mm Effective Depths

Polarity In an electron beam a polarity effect may arise as some of the primary beam collides with the collecting electrode F pol = ( M + + M - )/2M M is reading with normal polarity M + and M - readings with respective polarity In an electron beam polarity can change with depth (and energy) as electrons scatter obliquely

Polarity NPL polarity negative volts (to front window) Collecting electrode positive wrt front window Uses conventional connection of separate HV Connects to flying lead, or outer braid of cable

Polarity (conventional) NACP FLYING LEAD -100V EARTH NEGATIVE TYPE B

Polarity (electrometer floating) NACP +100V EARTH POSITIVE TYPE A

Reading Polarity: Measurement Accuracy 2400 2350 2300 2250 NACP: 4MeV, R50-200V +200V USE A GOOD REFERENCE CHAMBER Switch off and disconnect Earth cable Reverse polarity Reconnect and switch on Take readings until stable Repeat Do +/- volts consecutively (not as part of recombination study) If in doubt use F pol = 1.0(!) -50V Time

1/Reading Ion Recombination Theory Plotting 1/Reading vs 1/Voltage is a straight line This can easily be extrapolated to volts, or 100% collection efficiency 0 ( volt) 1/Volts Linear dependence permits use of the 2 voltage method f ion - 1 = (M 1 /M 2-1)/(V 1 /V 2-1) In particular, if V 1 = 2x V 2 then f ion = M 1 / M 2 (M is reading)

Recombination Correction f ion 0.051 Actual: Farmer Well behaved 1/Reading 0.050 0.049 0.048 12mev 20mev Parallel lines means curves overlay when normalised This means recombination is independent of energy Unless dose per pulse, Dp changes 0.047 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 1/Voltage 200 100 75 50 Volts

1/Reading Recombination Correction f ion Actual: Parallel Plate chambers 1.09 1.08 1.07 1.06 4 MeV, Markus 4 MeV NACP 10 MeV NACP 15 MeV NACP 1.05 1.04 1.03 1.02 1.01 0.99 1 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04 0.045 0.05 1/VOLTS oo 200 100 50 33 25 VOLTS

Recombination Correction Use of lower voltages (~100V) on parallel plate ensures linear region but may give large correction factor (2-3% on Varian) Use of higher voltages will give a smaller correction but loss of linearity means the error on the volt intercept is high It is recommended to stay close to NPL calibration voltage (100V) to reduce uncertainty MEASURE LOCALLY and use NPL as check only Due to uncertainty in Dose per Pulse

Recombination Correction f ion Roos chamber ion recombination 0.1000 1/reading 0.0900 0.0800 6MeV 9MeV 12MeV 16MeV 20MeV 0.0700 0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0.050 1/voltage

Recombination/Polarity NPL Certificate

Recombination Correction Recombination depends only on the Dose per Pulse (D p ) and chamber voltage Recombination is independent of energy But different energies might use a different Dose per Pulse!! Recombination is linearly related to D p F ion = 1 + (c-1)(v cal /V user ) + m(v cal /V user ) D p F ion = c + m x D p (at V user = 100Volt)

Linear Accelerator Calibration Roos or NACP with inside of front window at Z ref D w = R x N D,w x f t,p x f ion x f pol x %DD From %Depth Dose curve establish correction for dose at Z ref depth to D max depth Clinically quote Dose at d max and calibrate linac for 1cGy/mu at that point (NOT Z ref ) Negligible up to >12MeV Can be 4-5% at higher energy

Spreadsheet Calculates composite N D,W factors including polarity, recombination and Stopping power extrapolation User Electron Beam Definition 2 Type data into yellow cells only Accelerator Varian 2100cd Field Size (cmxcm) 10x10 at F.S.D (cm) 100 Energy 1 Energy 2 Energy 3 Energy 4 Energy 5 Energy 6 Nominal Energy (MeV) 6 MeV 9 MeV 12 MeV 16 MeV 20 MeV 20 MeV dmax (cm) in water 1.4 2.1 2.9 3.2 2.1 2.1 R50,I (cm) in water 2.4 3.6 4.9 6.5 8.0 8.0 R50,D (cm) in water 2.4 3.6 5.0 6.6 8.2 8.2 zref (cm) in water 1.3 2.1 2.9 3.9 4.8 4.8 Mean Surface Energy (MeV) 5.7 8.4 11.5 15.3 18.9 18.9 Stopping Power Ratio (Eqn D.2) 1.072 1.057 1.045 1.032 1.022 1.022 Reference Chamber Factor Summary: Calibration Factor x 10 7 (Gy/C) 14.03 13.82 13.71 13.46 13.33 13.33 Polarity Corr. 0.9981 1.0000 0.9998 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Recombination Corr. 1.0101 1.0101 1.0101 1.0101 1.0101 1.0101 Electrometer Corr. (nc) 1.0010 1.0010 1.0010 1.0010 1.0010 1.0010 % Depth Dose at Zref 100.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 95.4 95.4 Composite Factor (to cgy) 14.16 13.97 13.86 13.73 14.12 14.12

Extrapolation to Higher (& Lower) Beam Qualities The previous NPL calibration covers a limited range of electron beam qualities The higher end was equivalent to a ~16MeV clinical beam To extrapolate to a higher energy use the ratio of stopping powers at the two (different) reference positions N w,user = N w,r50=6.6 x [S w,air, R50=User, dref ] / [S w,air, R50=6.6 ] N w,user = N w,r50=6.6 x [S w,air, R50=User, dref ] / 1.0323 Use SPR table in protocol or spreadsheet

Nw,u Spreadsheet: Extrapolation to Higher Beam Qualities PLOT Nw,u calibration and extrapolation N w,u x 10 7 (Gy/C) 14.10 14.09 13.99 13.82 13.81 13.61 13.46 13.325 R 50,D (cm) 1.23 1.97 2.75 3.48 4.23 5.72 6.60 8.17 Type extrapolation value S w,air 14.2 14.0 13.8 13.6 13.4 13.2 13.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 R50,D

Nw,u Spreadsheet: Extrapolation to Higher Beam Qualities PLOT Nw,u calibration and extrapolation Type extrapolation value S w,air lin regrssn N w,u x 10 7 (Gy/C) 14.10 14.09 13.99 13.82 13.81 13.61 13.46 13.325 13.294 R 50,D (cm) 1.23 1.97 2.75 3.48 4.23 5.72 6.60 8.17-0.23% 14.2 14.0 13.8 13.6 13.4 13.2 13.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 R50,D

Nw,u Spreadsheet: Extrapolation to Higher Beam Qualities PLOT Nw,u calibration and extrapolation Type extrapolation value S w,air lin regrssn cubic N w,u x 10 7 (Gy/C) 14.10 14.09 13.99 13.82 13.81 13.61 13.46 13.325 13.294 13.262 R 50,D (cm) 1.23 1.97 2.75 3.48 4.23 5.72 6.60 8.17-0.23% -0.47% 14.2 14.0 13.8 13.6 13.4 13.2 13.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 R50,D

2,3,4 Rule of Thumb

Last Word Feedback on implementation and 2003/1996 differences tom.jordan@royalsurrey.nhs.uk Recommendations on 2 year calibration may be reexamined