Release of Galerucella calmariensis and Galerucella pusilla (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) To Control Purple Loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria

Similar documents
Holly Meehan 1 INTRODUCTION

Some are beneficial... biological noxious weed control can be elusive and long term

Purple Loosestrife Project Biocontrol Sites:

Appendix 5: Purple Loosestrife Biocontrol Monitoring Protocol from Cornell University

Integrated Weed Control Project - Biological Control -

EC Ecological Control of Purple Loosestrife : Monitoring Galerucella Establishment and Impact

History INVASIVE INSECTS THREATENING YOUR BACKYARD: BROWN MARMORATED STINK BUG & VIBURNUM LEAF BEETLE. Identification. Common Look-A-Likes 1/12/2015

Musk thistle and Canada thistle

Invasive Species Management Plans for Florida

Title Aliens, Unwanted Invaders, and Biogeography

Integrated Weed Control 2018 Catalog

Goldenrod Galls and the Scientific Method

Biology Principles of Ecology Oct. 20 and 27, 2011 Natural Selection on Gall Flies of Goldenrod. Introduction

Many of the pictures in this field guide came from Jerry Caldwell and Morgan Mendenhall. Thank you for the use of your excellent pictures.

Arthropod Containment in Plant Research. Jian J Duan & Jay Bancroft USDA ARS Beneficial Insects Research Unit Newark, Delaware

BIOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL

Kansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter

3.3 TXT + WKBK answers.docx Page 1 of 5

Entomology Research Laboratory The University of Vermont South Burlington, Vermont USA

Distribution of Hydrilla and Giant Salvinia in Mississippi in 2005

WEED WATCH LEEANNE MILA EL DORADO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Garlic Mustard Biocontrol An Update. Jeanie Katovich, Esther Gerber, Hariet Hinz, Luke Skinner, David Ragsdale and Roger Becker

What is insect forecasting, and why do it

Essential Understandings

Gypsy Moth Defoliation Harpers Ferry, Va

leeanne mila El dorado county department agriculture

Vanishing Species 5.1. Before You Read. Read to Learn. Biological Diversity. Section. What do biodiversity studies tell us?

Boise Parks and Recreation 2018 Monarch Report

A Gallery of Important Insect Pollinators

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE ALIEN PLANTS IN THE FYNBOS: AN OVERVIEW

Common Name: GLADE WINDFLOWER. Scientific Name: Anemone berlandieri Pritzel. Other Commonly Used Names: southern thimble-weed

Boise Parks & Recreation 2016 Monarch Report

Page # Invasive species Pop quiz. Invasive species. Invasive species. Endemic species - Species native to a particular area

BENEFICIAL INSECTS GOING BUGGY

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Attracting Pollinators to Your Garden

Dectes Stem Borer: A Summertime Pest of Soybeans

Avocado Thrips Subproject 2: Pesticide Evaluations and Phenology in the Field

ACCURACY OF MODELS FOR PREDICTING PHENOLOGY OF BLACKHEADED FIREWORM AND IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPROVED PEST MANAGEMENT

Text and photos by Caitlin LaBar. Prepared for USFWS in June 2009 Revised February 2014

Lesson: Why a Butterfly Garden? Seeking Pollinator Certification for a Butterfly Garden

Invasive Species Test. 30 Stations 90 seconds each -or- 15 stations (2/seat) 3 minutes each

Insect Pests. Ric Bessin

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Entomology Commons

Pollinators. Pam Brown University of Florida/IFAS Extension, Retired

Common Name: FLORIDA ADDER S-MOUTH ORCHID. Scientific Name: Malaxis spicata Swartz. Other Commonly Used Names: none

Biological control of invasive weeds: the fight against the homogenization and decline of the earth s floral biodiversity

JEFFERSON COUNTY NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL BOARD 380 Jefferson Street, Port Townsend Ext. 205

Two shoot miners as potential biological control agents for garlic mustard: should both be released?

Wild Rice Seed Enumeration Report: Upper Clam Lake, Lower Clam Lake, Long Lake, and Clam River Flowage

Ecology Practice Questions 1

Flower Species as a Supplemental Source of Pollen for Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) in Late Summer Cropping Systems

Exploring Matthaei s Ecosystems

Evaluation of natural enemies released for the biological control of purple loosestrife in Iowa

Pollinator Activity #1: How to Raise a Butterfly

C1 Weeds in North Queensland

The Mexican bromeliad weevil (Metamasius callizona): Changing Florida s canopy. Teresa M. Cooper, Ronald D. Cave, and J.

Biocontrol of Garlic Mustard and Buckthorn, an Update

Ecology Impacts and Genetic Variability Research for Invasive Weeds

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

FOSS California Environments Module Glossary 2007 Edition. Adult: The last stage in a life cycle when the organism is mature and can reproduce.

Gibbs: The Investigation of Competition

Grade: K to 2 Length: one hour Subjects: life science Topics: weed identification. Preparation

Competition Among Organisms

Managing stink bugs through cultural practices

Application of Remote Sensing and Global Positioning Technology for Survey and Monitoring of Plant Pests

Living Laboratory. Phacelia flowers Praying mantis Mealyworms Cockroaches Slugs Worms Wee beasties (Paramecium)

Investigating Use of Biocontrol Agents to Control Spotted Knapweed

The Effect of Larval Control of Black Fly (Simulium vittatum species complex) conducted in Winter Harborages

1:30 2:00 Tangible Examples of NVC Uses from Monitoring, Mapping, and Habitat Modeling. (Todd Keeler- Wolf, ESA Panel)

Red Admiral (Early Stages)

Common Name: GLADE MEADOW-PARSNIP. Scientific Name: Thaspium pinnatifidum (Buckley) Gray. Other Commonly Used Names: cutleaf meadow-parsnip

Dave Williams Liz Schultheis Jen Lau

Evaluation of the host range of Lathronympha strigana (L.) (Tortricidae), and Chrysolina abchasica

Florida Friendly Landscapes?

Weed Identification and Control. Jim Wanstall NMDA State Noxious Weed Coordinator

Brown Hairstreak (Early Stages)

Previously Used Scientific Names: Viburnum dentatum L. var. bracteatum

Plant Growth and Development Part I. Levels of Organization

Biocontrol of Rangeland Weeds TRA Pest Management Workshop, Feb 20, 11:15 am. Outline. Pest Management Workshop 2013 Bean, Rangeland Pest Control

SUMMER NECTAR AND FLORAL SOURCES

MEXICAN BROMELIAD WEEVIL REPORT 12 JANUARY 2013

Modelling the effect of field margins on parasitoid-host interactions

B A C K C O U N T R Y. Bio-Control of Diffuse Knapweed

Invasive Species Pilot Project: Site Visit Report

14 th North America Agroforestry Conference Ames, IA June 1 th, Gary Bentrup Research Landscape Planner USDA National Agroforestry Center

Leo Donovall PISC Coordinator/Survey Entomologist

Agapanthus Gall Midge update (Hayley Jones, Andrew Salisbury, Ian Waghorn & Gerard Clover) all images RHS

Levels of Organization

Biocontrol News and Views for Wyoming INSIDE WYO-BIO. Mapping the Weeds of the Past, Present and Future... 2

Description DESCRIPTION

Native Species? In US prior to European settlement

Rapid Global Invasion by Quadrastichus erythrinae (Eulophidae), the Erythrina Gall Wasp and the Hawaii Biological Control Success

Why Erosion and Sedimention Control is Important: A Fish s Point of View

Fickeisen Plains Cactus (Pediocactus peeblesianus ssp. fickeiseniae)

Chapter 6 Reading Questions

Identifying Thrips & Their Damage in New England Greenhouses

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Mapping for Successful Management. Kayla Malone Chaffee County Noxious Weed Department Supervisor

GARLIC MUSTARD (Alliaria petiolata) EMERGING PEST PLANT IN NC

PERFORMANCE OF NATURAL ENEMIES REARED ON ARTIFICIAL DIETS J.E. Carpenter 1 and S. Bloem 2 1

Transcription:

Release of Galerucella calmariensis and Galerucella pusilla (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) To Control Purple Loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria FINAL REPORT 2017 Prepared by: Mark Mayer Wayne Hudson Rhonda Strubel Cynthia Detweiler-Hill Angela Lovero George Robbins Phillip Alampi Beneficial Insect Laboratory New Jersey Department of Agriculture Division of Plant Industry

ABSTRACT The PABIL has released 2,221,503 Galerucella spp. beetles since 1997. With the ability of the beetles to establish, flourish and disperse in New Jersey, the beetles continue to have an impact on the purple loosestrife infestation levels within the state. The percent cover of purple loosestrife has been reduced by 70% and the average plant height of the tallest plants/quadrat has decreased from two meters to one meter in the monitored plots. The plant has been naturalized to where it is no longer the dominant plant in the ecosystem. Even though there is some variability from year to year that is not an uncommon occurrence in a biological control program. When the carrying capacity of the loosestrife at a site is reduced, a natural decrease in beetle population can be expected as their food source decreases. What follows then is a season or two of some increased loosestrife growth until the beetle population builds up and impacts the plants again but the cycle insures that the loosestrife will no longer be the pest that it has been in the past. Biological control does not mean eradication or that the pest will be eliminated from the ecosystem but rather that the carrying capacity of the pest in the ecosystem will be reduced. The project has been discontinued as there is no further need to rear the Galerucella spp. beetles as they are well established in the environment. INTRODUCTION Purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.) is an erect, herbaceous, invasive wetland perennial that is native to Eurasia. Since its accidental introduction to North America in the early 1800s, L. salicaria can now be found in all contiguous states of the United States (except Florida) and all Canadian provinces (Blossey 2002). In the United States, it covers approximately 400,000 acres and costs about $45 million a year in control costs and lost forage (USFWS 1999a). In a 1996 weed survey of the most troublesome weeds in the US, the Nature Conservancy ranked purple loosestrife #2 in wetlands and in 2000, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service declared purple loosestrife Public Enemy #1 on Federal Lands (Wiebe 2000). Some wetland areas of New Jersey were suitable for the establishment of this invasive plant. It can be found throughout most of the state, but it is primarily a problem in the northern and central counties, in the inner coastal plain along the Delaware River although its presence in the pinelands in the southern part of the state has been negligible. The damage to the state s wetlands is in its displacement of native flora, which is essential for food and cover to native wildlife. It can also decrease the water storage capacity of a wetland, reduce the ability of the wetland to attenuate floods, clog drainage channels and irrigation ponds and reduce the capacity of a wetland to hold and absorb excess water. In 1996, the Phillip Alampi Beneficial Insect Laboratory (PABIL) of the New Jersey Department of Agriculture began to investigate the feasibility of initiating a classical biological control program (developed by Bernd Blossey) for purple loosestrife in the state. Two species of Chrysomelid beetles, Galerucella calmariensis and Galerucella pusilla, native to Europe and introduced to North America in 1992, were obtained by the PABIL from Dr. Bernd Blossey of Cornell University for the purpose of rearing and eventual release into purple loosestrife (PLS) infested wetlands. The following year, 1997, the New Jersey Department of Agriculture (NJDA) and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), Division of Fish and Wildlife entered into a cooperative agreement to conduct a pilot project to release the beetles on purple loosestrife on five Wildlife Management Areas (WMA s). The program was expanded to include known bog turtle sites in 1998. The bog turtle, Clemmys muhlenbergii, is an endangered native species that is adversely affected by purple loosestrife where the plants form a monoculture so thick that the bog turtle cannot move through it. From 1998 until 2004, the New Jersey Department of Agriculture, working with the NJDEP, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Endangered and Nongame Species Program released 722,464 beetles in 36 bog turtle sites.

The PABIL rearing and release program continues to provide Galerucella spp. beetles for New Jersey and for out of state sales. Due to widespread beetle dispersal and establishment, only 93,790 beetles were released in thirteen sites within NJ on either state or private lands in 2012. Since the inception of this program in 1997, 2,221,503 beetles have been released at 129 sites in 17 of the 21 counties throughout NJ (See Table 1 which shows a breakdown of the number of release sites (old and new) and the number of Galerucella spp. beetles released in New Jersey from 1997-2014). Table 1. Number of Galerucella spp. Beetles Released, 1997 2014 Year No. Released No. Release Sites 1997 50,030 5 (5) 1 1998 222,283 8 (3) 1999 228,363 20 (19) 2000 353,251 22 (16) 2001 242,875 14 (13) 2002 203,573 22 (13) 2003 150,077 12 (8) 2004 59,000 12 (5) 2005 105,650 10 (9) 2006 26,100 7 (2) 2007 40,500 4 (3) 2008 36,500 7 (6) 2009 112,000 9 (4) 2010 2011 76,217 83,831 3 (0) 10 (5) 2012 93,790 13 (4) 2013 66,289 11 (3) 2014 45,625 8 (5) 2015 57,293 11 (6) 2016 8,166 1 Totals 2,213,337 129 2 1 Numbers in parenthesis are the number of new release sites for the year. 2 Number indicates the total number of sites; derived from adding number of new sites. No releases were made in 2017. The first recovery of Galerucella spp. beetles in New Jersey at a non-release dispersal site occurred in 2002. Between 2002 and 2013, the natural dispersal of the beetles was observed at 98 non-release sites. The presence of the beetles, either through release or natural dispersal, has now been documented in 19 of the state s 21 counties although it s likely that the beetles are present in all of them. In 2017, all purple loosestrife sites that were checked had beetles present. Galerucella spp. BEETLES Galerucella calmariensis and G. pusilla are nearly identical in their life cycles and morphology. In the field it is extremely difficult to differentiate between the two species, so for expediency they are grouped together as Galerucella spp. The adult beetle (Figure 2) is light brown, sometimes with a dark stripe on the elytra. Adults overwinter in the duff or soil beneath the plant and emerge in the spring shortly after new loosestrife foliage has sprouted. Feeding begins

immediately and continues for several days prior to reproduction. Adult feeding is easily recognizable by the shot-hole appearance in the leaf. The females lay eggs in masses (Figure 1), usually consisting of 2-10 eggs. These masses can be found along the stems, at leaf axils, or under the leaves. They are cream colored and have a noticeable dark stripe (frass left by the female) across the top. Each female is capable of producing 500 eggs during a 45-day oviposition period. Egg laying peaks in May and June, but will continue into mid-july (GLIFWC 2000). Larvae (Figure 2) begin to emerge 7-10 days after oviposition and migrate to the shoot tips. Larvae are yellow to orange, with a black head and are only about 6 mm in length when fully developed. First instar larvae feed primarily upon the apical meristem while later instars are less discriminating and feed more heavily upon the leaves. Larvae cause characteristic feeding damage, window-paning, consuming the upper layer of the leaf tissue while leaving the lower layer intact. The larval stage lasts about three weeks, after which they drop to the ground to pupate in the soil or duff beneath the loosestrife plant. The pupation period lasts for about two weeks. Adult emergence typically lasts from July through September. The total maturation time from egg to adult is about 30-45 days (GLIFWC 2000). Figure 1. Adult Galerucella spp. and Egg Mass Photos by J. Zhang and J. Lashomb, Rutgers University MATERIALS AND METHODS Study Sites Figure 2. Galerucella spp. Larva and Damage Photos by J. Zhang and J. Lashomb, Rutgers University In 2009 monitoring and data collection was discontinued due to the reduction in field staff. The five original release sites were monitored using the Cornell University purple loosestrife Monitoring Protocol as described in Blossey, et.al. (2015).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Galerucella spp. Establishment and Dispersal Initial establishment of Galerucella spp. beetles was documented in 1998 when recoveries were made at four of the five original release sites (Scudder et al. 1998). Since that time, the program has recovered beetles at 106 of 106 monitored release sites for a 100% success rate. Once the population of beetles reaches a level that results in significant reduction of purple loosestrife (50% defoliation), the beetles disperse to new loosestrife infestations (Wiebe 2000). The first dispersal by beetles of 1.85 miles from the Amwell Lake release site was documented in 2002. Since 2002, a total of 98 non-release site establishments have been recorded. There were no new Galerucella spp. recovery sites in 2013and 2014. These documented dispersals of Galerucella spp. beetles indicate that an important phase (the log phase of the population cycle) has been reached in the establishment and control program. Beetle populations have now reached the level where they actively search out new infestations of purple loosestrife. The Galerucella spp. furthest dispersal to date was to a Wildlife Management Area, 31 miles from the closest release site in 2007. Figure 4 shows before and after photos where the plant has been reduced in the wetland, at one of the dispersal sites. Figure 3. Galerucella Releases and Non-Release Recoveries in NJ 1997-2013*

Figure 4. Hainesville farm in 2004 and 2007 Galerucella spp. Impact One of the more frequently asked questions when discussing the use of Galerucella spp. beetles to reduce a purple loosestrife stand is, How long will it take to reduce the loosestrife infestation? The literature suggests that it may take 5-10 years before significant control becomes evident (Malecki et al. 1993). A number of factors, such as the size of the infestation, the number of beetles released, the success of the beetle s establishment at the site, and environmental conditions, all have a bearing on the time needed for control. The beetle populations have shown a classical predator/prey population lag/log scenario since the initial release in 1997. Fluctuations will occur between the populations of loosestrife and the beetles until the carrying capacity of the purple loosestrife is lowered, resulting in a significant reduction from the original invasive population. It must be remembered that all populations oscillate and that the loosestrife population will come back but not to its initial levels. Essentially the beetles naturalize the population, making the pest part of the natural flora. At this point, the loosestrife should be less of a problem but many people become concerned when they see it in a wetland and there may be no further reason for that concern due to the biocontrol by the beetles. As the loosestrife biomass decreases, native flora, can again establish in its place. There has been an observable increase in other plant species at both Amwell Lake (Figure 5) and Columbia Lake Wildlife Management Areas (Figure 6). The cattail population at has been particularly noticeable, as more and more plants have appeared in the areas where the loosestrife population has declined (Figure 6). The decrease in the loosestrife population at each of these sites has lead to increased diversity and better balanced ecosystems at the sites. Figure 5. Amwell Lake 1999 and 2008 Figure 6 also shows a sequence of photos by year for the Columbia Lake WMA since 1997. The initial release at that site was in 1997 and by 2001 the number of inflorescences was substantially

reduced. By 2004, native plants were back with cattails predominating by 2007. Purple loosestrife started to come back in 2008, reaching high population levels in 2009 and 2010 but these population levels were visibly less than half of the original population in 1997. By 2011 the beetles had defoliated the plants to the point at which there was little flowering in 2012 and 2013. The purple loosestrife made a small comeback again in 2014 but by 2015 the population was reduced below that of 2010. What you have is a series of peak populations beginning in 1997 where the population was greatest with a second peak in 2009 which was less than half of 1997. The last peak was in 2014 which was far lower than 2009. Each successive peak of the purple loosestrife was smaller than the previous one and the beetles took less time to reduce the population. The plant population has not only been reduced but plants were almost one meter less in overall height than they were at the beginning of the project (Figure 7). The plants went from an average of almost two meters in height overall to one meter in height which is similar to the plant height found in Europe. In 2011 the beetles had defoliated the plants again and there was little flowering by 2013. Unfortunately, no photos were available for 2002, 2003 (due to bad film) and 2010 (no photos taken) but the reinfestation levels of the purple loosestrife were not near the levels observed in 1997. When the yearly photos are compared there is far less flowering and % cover of purple loosestrife from 1997 than in the present. 1997 1998 2000 2001

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2012

2013 2014 2015 Figure 6. Columbia Lake 1997-2015 Photos by M. Mayer and T. Scudder When a biological control organism is released it generally takes six to ten generations of the beneficial before you see an impact on the pest population. When the pest population came back at Columbia Lake in 2008, only three years passed before the purple loosestrife population was reduced by the beetles. The second population peak of the purple loosestrife was not as high and it did not take as much time for the beetles to reduce the population. Population fluctuations are like a typical numerical response of predator to prey and should continue into the future with the peak populations of the purple loosestrife continuing to decline until they reach an equilibrium. The goal of the program is not to eliminate the purple loosestrife, but rather to reduce its impact in the environment. Biological control does not mean eradication or that the pest will be eliminated from the ecosystem but rather that the carrying capacity of the pest in the ecosystem will be reduced to the point that the plant s impact is mitigated. Figures 7 and 8 were developed from 2008 data which was the last year that numerical data was collected but they both show detrimental effects on the plant population by reducing overall plant height and the percent cover of the plant in the wetlands. The ultimate effect is to allow native plants to repopulate the wetlands and compete with the loosestrife. The loosestrife is controlled but it is not gone. We are at the point where we can appreciate the purple loosestrife for its beauty and its function as an excellent nectar and pollen source for honeybees and other pollinators. Purple loosestrife is no longer a serious threat to wetlands in NJ and if people want to plant it in their gardens, let them, it s just more beetle food. The project has been discontinued as there is no further need to rear the Galerucella spp. beetles as they are well established in the environment.

Height in Centimeters 250 Average Plant Height of the Five Tallest Purple Loosestrife Plants/Quadrat at Galerucella spp. Release Sites in NJ 1997-2008 200 150 100 50 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Year Figure 7. Average Statewide Plant Height of Purple Loosestrife at the Release Sites in NJ. Figure 8. Percent Cover and Galerucella spp. Population at the Amwell Lake Release Site. CONCLUSION The PABIL has released 2,221,503 Galerucella spp. beetles since 1997 and with the ability of the beetles to establish, flourish and disperse in New Jersey continues to have an impact on the purple loosestrife infestation levels within the state. The percent cover of purple loosestrife has been reduced by 70% and the average plant height of the tallest plants/quadrat has decreased from two meters to one meter in the monitored plots. The plant has been naturalized to where it is no longer the dominant plant in the ecosystem. Even though there is some variability from year to year that is not an uncommon occurrence in a biological control program. When the carrying capacity of the loosestrife at a site is reduced, a natural decrease in beetle population

can be expected as their food source decreases. What usually follows then is a season or two of some increased loosestrife growth until the beetle population builds up and impacts the plants again but the cycle insures that the loosestrife will no longer be the pest that it has been in the past. The PABIL has discontinued the program as the beetles are well established and capable of responding to any increase in the purple loosestrife population. ACKNO WLEDGEMENTS Cornell University Dr. Bernd Blossey Rutgers University Dr. James Lashomb and Dr. Jason Zhang New Jersey Department of Agriculture Phillip Alampi Beneficial Insect Laboratory Eric VandenBerghe Robert Huffman* Amber Bradley Daniel Palmer* John Lukaszewski* Robert Chianese* Thomas Scudder* *Retired

REFERENCES Blossey, B., and D. Schroeder. 1991. Study and screening of potential biological control agents of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.). IntnÆl Inst. of Bio. Cont. Blossey, B. 2002. Biological Control of Non-Indigenous Plant Species, Cornell University. http://www.invasiveplants.net/plants/purpleloosestrife.htm. Blossey, B., C.B. Randall, M. Schwȁrtzlander. 2015. Biology and Biological Control of Purple Loosestrife., 2 nd Edition. FHTET-2015-3. (GLIFWC) Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission. 2000. The Life Cycle of Galerucella Beetles. http://www.glifwc.org/weeds/loosestrife/biocontrol/plbio2a_i.htm Malecki, R.A., B. Blossey, S.D. Hight, D. Schroeder, L.T. Kok, and J.R. Coulson. 1993. Biological Control of Purple Loosestrife. BioScience 43: 680-686. Scudder, T. and M. Mayer. 1998. Unpublished Annual Report on Purple Loosestrife. Phillip Alampi Beneficial Insect Laboratory, Division of Plant Industry, New Jersey Department of Agriculture. Scudder, T., M. Mayer, D. Palmer, R. Hufffman, J. Lukaszewski, S. Elsner, M. Kolodziej. 2006. Release of Galerucella calmariensis and Galerucella pusilla (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) To Control Purple Loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria: 2006 Report. Phillip Alampi Beneficial Insect Laboratory, Division of Plant Industry, New Jersey Department of Agriculture, Trenton, NJ. http://www.state.nj.us/agriculture/plant/biolab.htm Stuckey, R.L. 1980. Distributional history of Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) in North America. Bartonia 47: 3-20. (USFWS) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999a. The Loosestrife Problem. USFWS. http://bluegoose.arw.r9.fws.gov/nwrsfiles/habitatmgmt/pestmgmt/loosestrifeproblem.html (USFWS) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999b. Appendix 1: Biology of Purple Loosestrife. USFWS. http://bluegoose.arw.r9.fws.gov/nwrsfiles/habitatmgmt/pestmgmt/3speciesea/3speciesapp endix1.html Wiebe, A. 2000. Purple Loosestrife Outline and Bibliography. http://www.agron.iastate.edu/~weeds/weedbiollibrary/517%20student%20pages/ /purple.ht