N. Tsoupas, E. Rodger, J. Claus, H.W. Foelsche, and P. Wanderer Brookhaven National Laboratory Associated Universities, Inc. Upton, New York 11973

Similar documents
FOCUSING AND MATCHING PROPERTIES OF THE ATR TRANSFER LINE*

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (03/lfi?lfibr-~/15/1998):

+.V) eo(o) -2 so - sx. hngc)90w3-- Beam-beam collisions and crossing angles in RHIC*

Colliding Crystalline Beams

AC dipole based optics measurement and correction at RHIC

A NEW TARGET CONCEPT FOR PROTON ACCELERATOR DRIVEN BORON NEUTRON CAPTURE THERAPY APPLICATIONS* Brookhaven National Laboratory. P.O.

DML and Foil Measurements of ETA Beam Radius

Bulk Modulus Capacitor Load Cells

Plasma Response Control Using Advanced Feedback Techniques

Spin States Separation Based on the Longitudinal Stern-Gerlach Effect

Tell uric prof i 1 es across the Darrough Known Geothermal Resource Area, Nevada. Harold Kaufniann. Open-file Report No.

Scaling between K+ and proton production in nucleus-nucleus collisions *

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

PLASMA MASS DENSITY, SPECIES MIX AND FLUCTUATION DIAGNOSTICS USING FAST ALFVEN WAVE

W. Fischer and M. Okamura Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA

(4) How do you develop an optimal signal detection technique from the knowledge of

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (06/16/1998-9/15/1998):

The photoneutron yield predictions by PICA and comparison with the measurements

Optimization of NSLS-II Blade X-ray Beam Position Monitors: from Photoemission type to Diamond Detector. P. Ilinski

4kU. Measurement of Storage Ring Motion at the Advanced Light Source. QSTt ERNESTORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEYNATIONAL LABORATORY

8STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF HIGH EXPLOSIVE DETONATION DATA. Beckman, Fernandez, Ramsay, and Wendelberger DRAFT 5/10/98 1.

A Distributed Radiator, Heavy Ion Driven Inertial Confinement Fusion Target with Realistic, Multibeam Illumination Geometry

Magnetic Measurements of the Elliptical Multipole Wiggler Prototype

GA A22722 CENTRAL THOMSON SCATTERING UPGRADE ON DIII D

CQNl_" RESPONSE TO 100% INTERNAL QUANTUM EFFICIENCY SILICON PHOTODIODES TO LOW ENERGY ELECTRONS AND IONS

1 GeV CW nonscaling FFAG for ADS, and magnet parameters

Analysis of Shane Telescope Aberration and After Collimation

Beam Dynamics Activities at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (Jefferson Lab)

Development of a High Intensity EBIT for Basic and Applied Science

Start-up Noise in 3-D Self-AmpMed

Survey, Alignment and Beam Stability at the Advanced Light Source

9 7og$y4- International Conference On Neutron Scattering, Toronto August Spin Dynamics of the reentrant spin glass Fe0.7A10.3.

Diffractive Dijet Search with Roman Pots at CDF

D. Trbojevic, A.J. Stevens, M.A. Harrison, E Dell, and S. Peggs Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA

The PEP-I1 B-Factory Septum Quadrupole Magnet

Performance and Capabilities of the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory at BNL. June Collider-Accelerator Department

Plutonium 239 Equivalency Calculations

Determine the Inside Wall Temperature of DSTs using an Infrared Temperature Sensor

Final Technical Report. Department of Energy. for

BASAL CAMBRIAN BASELINE GEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION COMPLETED

Modeling Laser and e-beam Generated Plasma-Plume Experiments Using LASNEX

Controlling Backstreaming Ions from X-ray Converter Targets with Time Varying Final Focusing Solenoidal Lens and Beam Energy Variation

RESEARCH IN ACCELERATOR PHYSICS (THEORY)

12/16/95-3/15/96 PERIOD MULTI-PARAMETER ON-LINE COAL BULK ANALYSIS. 2, 1. Thermal Neutron Flux in Coal: New Coal Container Geometry

Multicusp Sources for Ion Beam Lithography Applications

GA A26686 FAST ION EFFECTS DURING TEST BLANKET MODULE SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS IN DIII-D

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NEUTRAL BEAMLINE IRON TO PLASMA NON-AXISYMMETRIC FIELDS

ust/ aphysics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA

Two-Screen Method for Determining Electron Beam Energy and Deflection from Laser Wakefield Acceleration

Multi-Scale Chemical Process Modeling with Bayesian Nonparametric Regression

Capabilities for Testing the Electronic Configuration in Pu

August 3,1999. Stiffness and Strength Properties for Basic Sandwich Material Core Types UCRL-JC B. Kim, R.M. Christensen.

UPGRADED CALIBRATIONS OF THE THOMSON SYSTEM AT DIII D

Study of a Non-Intrusrve blectron

Constant of Motion for a One- Dimensional and nth-order Autonomous System and Its Relation to the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian

Comparison Between Various Beam Steering Algorithms for the CEBAF Lattice* INTRODUCTION. SVD Based Algorithm

GA A27806 TURBULENCE BEHAVIOR AND TRANSPORT RESPONSE APPROACHING BURNING PLASMA RELEVANT PARAMETERS

Applications of Pulse Shape Analysis to HPGe Gamma-Ray Detectors

Walter P. Lysenko John D. Gilpatrick Martin E. Schulze LINAC '98 XIX INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE CHICAGO, IL AUGUST 23-28,1998

e, )2 Crossing Angles In The Beam-Beam Interaction R.H. Siernann* II. PERTURBATION FORMALISM SLAC-PUB-7225

RWM FEEDBACK STABILIZATION IN DIII D: EXPERIMENT-THEORY COMPARISONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ITER

A Geological and Geophysical Assessment of the Royal Center Gas Storage Field in North-Central Indiana, a Joint NIPSCO, DOE & GRI Case Study

Fission-Fusion Neutron Source

Three-Dimensional Silicon Photonic Crystals

GA A23736 EFFECTS OF CROSS-SECTION SHAPE ON L MODE AND H MODE ENERGY TRANSPORT

The NLC Positron Source*

Alex Dombos Michigan State University Nuclear and Particle Physics

Hyperon Particle Physics at JHF. R. E. Mischke

FUSION WITH Z-PINCHES. Don Cook. Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185

Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

The Gas Flow from the Gas Attenuator to the Beam Line

Peak Reliability Delivering near real-time phase angle deltas using Inter-Control Center Communication Protocol (ICCP)

SPHERICAL COMPRESSION OF A MAGNETIC FIELD. C. M. Fowler DISCLAIMER

- High Energy Gull Generator

Excitations of the transversely polarized spin density. waves in chromium. E3-r 1s

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY

Determine the Inside Wall Temperature of DSTs using an Infrared Temperature Sensor

GA A24166 SUPER-INTENSE QUASI-NEUTRAL PROTON BEAMS INTERACTING WITH PLASMA: A NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION

INTERMOLECULAR POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND HIGH RESOLUTION MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY OF WEAKLY BOUND COMPLEXES. Final Progress Report

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF SOLVENT TRANSPORT IN POLYMER NETWORKS

BWXT Y-12 Y-12. A BWXT/Bechtel Enterprise SMALL, PORTABLE, LIGHTWEIGHT DT NEUTRON GENERATOR FOR USE WITH NMIS

Summary Report: Working Group 5 on Electron Beam-Driven Plasma and Structure Based Acceleration Concepts

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Multi-scale modeling with generalized dynamic discrepancy

CEIVED. 3UN 2 5 m7 O ST I. NE Holden' NEUTRON AND NUCLEAR DATA REVISED FOR THE 1997/98HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS*

(6, magnetic moment) it is

FUSION TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE

by KAPL, Inc. a Lockheed Martin company KAPL-P EFFECTS OF STATOR AND ROTOR CORE OVALITY ON INDUCTION MACHINE BEHAVIOR September 1996 NOTICE

GA A22677 THERMAL ANALYSIS AND TESTING FOR DIII D OHMIC HEATING COIL

GA A24016 PHYSICS OF OFF-AXIS ELECTRON CYCLOTRON CURRENT DRIVE

Turbulent Scaling in Fluids. Robert Ecke, MST-10 Ning Li, MST-10 Shi-Yi Li, T-13 Yuanming Liu, MST-10

Quench Propagation Velocity for Highly Stabilized Conductors

U. S. Department of Energy

Incoherent wind velocity sensing with a two-beam interferometer

GA A27857 IMPACT OF PLASMA RESPONSE ON RMP ELM SUPPRESSION IN DIII-D

PROCEEDINGS THIRD WORKSHOP GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR ENGINEERING. December 14-15,1977

GA A26474 SYNERGY IN TWO-FREQUENCY FAST WAVE CYCLOTRON HARMONIC ABSORPTION IN DIII-D

Design of Current Leads for the MICE Coupling Magnet

Data Comparisons Y-12 West Tower Data

Ray M. Stringfield Robert J. Kares J. R. Thomas, Jr.

Transcription:

,+ v Submitted t o : " 1995 Particle Accelerator Conference & International Conference on High-Energy Accelerators (May 1-5, 1995), Dallas, TX BNL-61195 DESIGN AND B-FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF A LAMBERTSON INJECTION MAGNET FOR THE RHIC MACHINE; N. Tsoupas, E. Rodger, J. Claus, H.W. Foelsche, and P. Wanderer Brookhaven National Laboratory Associated Universities, Inc. Upton, New York 11973 Two Lambertson-typeinjection magnets have &en designed, constructed and tested magnetically. One magnet is the mirror image of the other and each will serve as an injector in the rings of the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) accelerators under construction at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL).To obtain the required field quality in the injected beam region and low stray fields in the circulating beam region of the magnet, an optimization study was performed using computer codes to provide solutions for a two and three dimensional model of the magnet. The calculations are compared to the magnetic field measurements taken in the injected and circulating beam regions mentioned above. Field inhomogeneities in the injected beam region were less than 6x104 for either measured or calculatedb-fields. The magnetic-field strength in the circulating beam region was less than 0.1 Gauss (measured or calculated). A description of the mechanical design of the magnet as well as a detailed comparison of the measured magnetic fields to those calculated using the two and three dimensional computer codes is presented here. Fig. la shows the injected beam at the entrance of the magnet which will bend by -38 mrad and will then continue at the exit of the magnet on the same vertical plane as the RHIC circulating beam. RHIC ClRC 7-z F'igure la. I I. INTRODUCTION SECTION A-A Figure lb. The Lambertson injection magnet which will be described in this paper is the last magnetic element of the beam transfer line between the Alternating Gradient Synchrotron (AGS) and RHlC accelerators at BNL. Two such magnets have been constructed, each of which will inject into the counter circulating beam-rings of the RHIC machine. Since each magnet is the mirror image of the other, we will only describe the magnet which injects into the counterclockwisecirculating beam-ring of RHIC. II. GEOMETRY and DESIGN PARAMETERS The relative location of the magnet with respect to the straight section of the RHIC ring is shown in Fig. la (top view), Ib (side view), and IC(view looking upstream). *Work performed under the auspices of the U.S.Department of Energy. DISl'R\BWON OF THIS DOCUMUJT IS UWIM! Figure IC. MAST

4 A cross section of the magnet by a vertical plane containing the symmetry axis (AA) of thc magnct is shown in Fig. Ib. In this figure. the central ray of the injected beam makes an angle of -3 rrirad with the central ray of the RHIC circulating beam. Beam size considerations at the entrance and exit of the magnet for both the injected and circulating beams dictated that the surface of the bottom pole of the magnet make an angle of -2.57 mrad with the central ray of the circulating beam, and -2.24 mrad with the axis of the circulating bemi pipe. This geometry helps minimize the septum thickness of the magnet, which is 10.8 mm as seen in Fig. IC. Fig. IC, a view of the magnet iooking upstream shows the injected and circulating tube sizes, wall thickness, and their relative locations. There is a 4. 8 9 mm air space between the circulating beam tube and the magnet iron. The locations of the bean at the upstream ( U / S ) and downstream (D/S) ends of the, magnet is also shown. The design parameters of the magnet, which appear below and in Figs. la through IC were determined from optimization calculations, taking into account the geometry of the injection region the magnetic properties of the magnet steel and permalloy-80pipe, and the maximum field at the beam injection gap, which in turn was determined by the field requirements in the injection and circulating beam regions. Magnet design parameters 1. Length = 4 m 2. Bend angle = 38 mrad @ ( B.p=100 T.m 3. Magnet gap = 26.1 mm 4. Inner dim. of circulating beam tube = 67 mm Wall thickness = 1.3 mm III. MECHANICAL DESIGN Details of the mechanical design of the magnet as well as the magnetic properties of the steel and the high permeability of the circulating; beam tube appear in Ref. 1. IV. MAGNETIC FELIX (CALCULATIONS and MEASUREMENTS)i The magnetic field calculations were performed using the computer code OPERA of VECTOR FIELDS Inc. (Ref. 2) and were separated into two parts: fust in the calculations of the fields well inside the magnet where the 2-D version of the code. was used, and second, the calculations of the fields at the entrance and exit of the magnet where the 3-D version of the code was used. A ) Two Dimensional Calculations. The 2-Dcalculations were performed in order to determine the minimum septum thickness (minimum distance of the RHIC beam pipe from the lower magnetic. % ' pol: of the magnet) and the maximum radius of the circulating beam pipe, which will keep stray fields in the circulated beam region at values of less than 1 Gauss, and field uniformity in the injected beam region of AB/B16x104. One of the cross sections of the magnet where 2-D calculations were performed is shown in Fig. 2 and corresponds to the middle of the magnet. Q Figure 2. Because of the -3 mrad vertical slope of the magnet axis with respect to the horizontal plane (Fig. Ib), the septum thickness along the magnet varies and is at a minimum at the exit of the magnet. For this reason we performed the 2-Dcalculationson a cross-section at the exit of the magnet and subsequently verified that the optimum 2-Dsolution at the exit of the magnet also satisfies the B-field requirements mentioned above at any other cross-section of the magnet. The permeability of the magnet's iron and that of the pemalloy-80 tube used in the calculations were equivalent to C1006 steel, and to p-metal respectively. The results of an optimized solution for a cross section at the middle of the magnet and at an excitation current corresponding to a 38 mrad bend of a 100 Tm rigid beam are as follows: In the injected beam region the calculated field uniformity is AB/BS6xlV and is computed over the area covered by 95% of the injected beam. The measured field uniformity is AB/B=(5.WOS)xlw. The measurements of the field uniformity in the injected beam region, were performed with a 30" long rotating coil of radius=l cm. The axis of the measuring coil was parallel to the center axis (AA) (Fig. la) and at -1.2 cm above the bottom surface of the magnet's gap and the coil was inserted well inside the magnet gap and away from the fringe field region. The measurements were performed at three locations inside the magnet with the axis of the coil placed (-I, 0 and +I cm) away from the (AA) symmetry axis of the magnet. The measurements of the B field (for the same excitation current as above) in the circulating beam region were made by placing the 30" long coil well inside the circulating beam tube with its axis parallel to, and 1.8 cm above. the circulating beam tube axis. The measured field value was (0.04 f 0.01) Gauss. The correspondingcalculated

DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. lrnages are produced from the best available original document.

4 value of the B-field was 0.055 Gauss. In order to demonstrate the effect of the high permeability material of the circulating beam tube, the 2-D calculations above were repeated on the same cross section (at the middle of thc magnet), except this time the circulating beam tube was made of the same material as the magnet and the air space between the tube and the magnet was filled with the same material as the magnet. The results of the calculated B field at the same location inside the Circulating beam tube as above was 7.5 Gauss, which is two orders of magnitude higher as compared to the corresponding field of 0.055 Gauss when the permalloy-80 tube is in place. B ) Three Dimensional Calculations The 3-D calculations were necessary to help us design the entrance and exit regions of the magnet in order to minimize the fringe fields in the circulating beam tube at the entrance and exit of the magnet. An isometric schematic plot of the entrance and exit regions of the magnet with the magnet coil and the field clamps is shown in Fig. 3. fringe field region of the magnet. From these measurcments a beam bcnd of (0.8 f 0.1) prad was calculated. This value is in good agreement with the calculated value of 0.4 prad. In order to demonstrate the effect of the extensions and field clamps mentioned above, we performed 3D calculations on the same magnet with the extensions and field clamps removed. The calculated fringe field integral of the By component of the field in the circulating beam pipe, with the extensions and the field clamps removed, yields a bending angle of 75 prad on a 100 Tm rigid beam. A plot of the calculated Bycomponent of the field inside the circulating beam pipe at the exit of the magnet from -10 cm inside the magnet to 40 cm outside, (with the extensions and field clamps removed), is shown in Fig. 4. The high fields (- lo00 Gauss) and high field gradients shown in Fig. 4 were reduced by a factor greater than 10oO with the use of extensions and field clamps. This reduction of the fringe field is shown in Fig. 5 of Ref. 1. This figure is a view of a 3-D plot of the By component of the fringe field in the region of the circulating beam pipe of the magnet, with extensions and field clamps in place. X(cm) Y(cm) -1.2 Z(cm) -10.0 695-1 2 0.0 Figure 3. The lower pole piece of the magnet was extended by 7 cm at the entrance and 4 cm at the exit beyond the edge of the top pole piece of the magnet (Fig. 3) to reduce the fiinge field at the circulating beam region. The field clamps also shown in Fig. 3 were placed at the entrance and exit of the magnet to further reduce the fringe field inside the circulating beam pipe. The calculated cumulative effect of the By (vertical) component of the fringe field inside the circulating beam region on a 100 Tm rigid beam is equivalent to 0.4 pad bend when the extensions of the lower magnetic poles and the field clamps are in place. The experimental measurements of the corresponding field integral inside the circulating beam pipe were done with a 4.946 m long coil which was placed inside the circulating beam pipe with end of the coil extending well beyond the -12 10.0-1.2 20.0-0% -1 2 30.0-12 40.0 Figure 4 V. REFERENCES [11 Design of a Lambertson injection magnet for the RHIC machine. E. Rodger, N. Tsoupas, J. Claus, H.W. Foelsche. BNL PAC Washington DC May 17-21) 1993. 121 Vector Fields Inc.

DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an amunt of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.