Does the ATOVS RARS Network Matter for Global NWP? Brett Candy, Nigel Atkinson & Stephen English

Similar documents
Assimilation of IASI data at the Met Office. Fiona Hilton Nigel Atkinson ITSC-XVI, Angra dos Reis, Brazil 07/05/08

Bias correction of satellite data at the Met Office

ASSIMILATION OF CLOUDY AMSU-A MICROWAVE RADIANCES IN 4D-VAR 1. Stephen English, Una O Keeffe and Martin Sharpe

Satellite Radiance Data Assimilation at the Met Office

STATUS OF JAPANESE METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITES AND RECENT ACTIVITIES OF MSC

OBSERVING SYSTEM EXPERIMENTS ON ATOVS ORBIT CONSTELLATIONS

MONITORING WEATHER AND CLIMATE FROM SPACE

Ninth Workshop on Meteorological Operational Systems. Timeliness and Impact of Observations in the CMC Global NWP system

Bias correction of satellite data at the Met Office

Scatterometer Wind Assimilation at the Met Office

An Evaluation of FY-3C MWHS-2 and its potential to improve forecast accuracy at ECMWF

Dissemination of Global Products from EUMETSAT

- an Operational Radio Occultation System

Land Data Assimilation for operational weather forecasting

ASSIMILATION EXPERIMENTS WITH DATA FROM THREE CONICALLY SCANNING MICROWAVE INSTRUMENTS (SSMIS, AMSR-E, TMI) IN THE ECMWF SYSTEM

Dissemination of global products from Metop

UPDATE ON RARS. Action/Recommendation proposed:

Bias correction of satellite data at Météo-France

Use of AMSU data in the Met Office UK Mesoscale Model

IMPACT EXPERIMENTS ON GMAO DATA ASSIMILATION AND FORECAST SYSTEMS WITH MODIS WINDS DURING MOWSAP. Lars Peter Riishojgaard and Yanqiu Zhu

EARS-ATMS, EARS-CrIS and EARS-VIIRS: Three New Regional Services

NOAA Direct Broadcast Real-Time Network Status

NOAA Direct Broadcast Data Initiative to Meet NWP Latency Requirements

Extending the use of surface-sensitive microwave channels in the ECMWF system

EUMETSAT PLANS. Dr. K. Dieter Klaes EUMETSAT Am Kavalleriesand 31 D Darmstadt Germany

Plans for the Assimilation of Cloud-Affected Infrared Soundings at the Met Office

NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS USING CLOUD MOTION WINDS AT ECMWF GRAEME KELLY. ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading ABSTRACT

Use and impact of ATOVS in the DMI-HIRLAM regional weather model

MONITORING WEATHER AND CLIMATE FROM SPACE

Effect of Predictor Choice on the AIRS Bias Correction at the Met Office

EUMETSAT SAF NETWORK. Lothar Schüller, EUMETSAT SAF Network Manager

AMVs in the ECMWF system:

OSSE to infer the impact of Arctic AMVs extracted from highly elliptical orbit imagery

AMVs in the operational ECMWF system

WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THE NWP SAF ATMOSPHERIC MOTION VECTOR MONITORING?

EUMETSAT PLANS. K. Dieter Klaes EUMETSAT Darmstadt, Germany

TOWARDS IMPROVED HEIGHT ASSIGNMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL OF AMVS IN MET OFFICE NWP

Status Report on the Global Regional ATOVS Retransmission Service (RARS)

Assimilating AMSU-A over Sea Ice in HIRLAM 3D-Var

Use of ATOVS raw radiances in the operational assimilation system at Météo-France

ITSC-18 RARS TECHNICAL SUBGROUP. (Participants: See Annex 1)

Recent Data Assimilation Activities at Environment Canada

OCEAN & SEA ICE SAF CDOP2. OSI-SAF Metop-A IASI Sea Surface Temperature L2P (OSI-208) Validation report. Version 1.4 April 2015

THE POLAR WIND PRODUCT SUITE

Improved Use of AIRS Data at ECMWF

ACCOUNTING FOR THE SITUATION-DEPENDENCE OF THE AMV OBSERVATION ERROR IN THE ECMWF SYSTEM

REPORT ON EUMETCAST INCLUDING GEONETCAST

The ATOVS and AVHRR Product Processing Facility of EPS

Initial results from using ATMS and CrIS data at ECMWF

All-sky assimilation of MHS and HIRS sounder radiances

THE ASSIMILATION OF SURFACE-SENSITIVE MICROWAVE SOUNDER RADIANCES AT ECMWF

Use and impact of satellite data in the NZLAM mesoscale model for the New Zealand region

The satellite wind activities at Météo-France!

EARS: A user-driven Regional Data Service

COMPARISON OF SIMULATED RADIANCE FIELDS USING RTTOV AND CRTM AT MICROWAVE FREQUENCIES IN KOPS FRAMEWORK

STATUS AND DEVELOPMENT OF SATELLITE WIND MONITORING BY THE NWP SAF

EUMETSAT current and future plans on product generation and dissemination

EUMETSAT SAF NETWORK. Lothar Schüller, EUMETSAT SAF Network Manager

AVHRR Polar Winds Derivation at EUMETSAT: Current Status and Future Developments

Using HIRS Observations to Construct Long-Term Global Temperature and Water Vapor Profile Time Series

Global NWP Index documentation

OSI SAF Sea Ice products

Pre-Operational Assimilation Testing of the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounder (SSMI/S)

REPORT ON GEONETCAST In response to CGMS action/recommendation

Introduction to Data Assimilation

PRECONVECTIVE SOUNDING ANALYSIS USING IASI AND MSG- SEVIRI

NOAA MSU/AMSU Radiance FCDR. Methodology, Production, Validation, Application, and Operational Distribution. Cheng-Zhi Zou

IMPROVEMENTS IN FORECASTS AT THE MET OFFICE THROUGH REDUCED WEIGHTS FOR SATELLITE WINDS. P. Butterworth, S. English, F. Hilton and K.

MET report. The IASI moisture channel impact study in HARMONIE for August-September 2011

The satellite winds in the operational NWP system at Météo-France

A two-season impact study of the Navy s WindSat surface wind retrievals in the NCEP global data assimilation system

THE USE OF SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS IN NWP

EARS-NWC SERVICE: NRT NOWCASTING PRODUCTS ON EUMETCAST

Assimilating only surface pressure observations in 3D and 4DVAR

ASCAT NRT Data Processing and Distribution at NOAA/NESDIS

UPDATES IN THE ASSIMILATION OF GEOSTATIONARY RADIANCES AT ECMWF

REGIONAL SPECIALISED METEOROLOGICAL CENTRE (RSMC), EXETER, VOS MONITORING REPORT. (Submitted by Colin Parrett (United Kingdom), RSMC Exeter)

Satellite Assimilation Activities for the NRL Atmospheric Variational Data Assimilation (NAVDAS) and NAVDAS- AR (Accelerated Representer) Systems

VALIDATION OF DUAL-MODE METOP AMVS

MONITORING WEATHER AND CLIMATE FROM SPACE

Feature-tracked 3D Winds from Satellite Sounders: Derivation and Impact in Global Models

The NWP SAF: what can it do for you?

ECMWF. ECMWF Land Surface Analysis: Current status and developments. P. de Rosnay M. Drusch, K. Scipal, D. Vasiljevic G. Balsamo, J.

Upgraded usage of MODIS-derived polar winds in the JMA operational global 4D-Var assimilation system

IMPACT STUDIES OF AMVS AND SCATTEROMETER WINDS IN JMA GLOBAL OPERATIONAL NWP SYSTEM

Improving the use of satellite winds at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)

ASSIMILATION OF ATOVS RETRIEVALS AND AMSU-A RADIANCES AT THE ITALIAN WEATHER SERVICE: CURRENT STATUS AND PERSPECTIVES

An Eye in the Sky EUMETSAT. Monitoring Weather, Climate and the Environment

Evaluation and comparisons of FASTEM versions 2 to 5

The assimilation of AMSU and SSM/I brightness temperatures in clear skies at the Meteorological Service of Canada

Toward assimilation of CrIS and ATMS in the NCEP Global Model

Interaction of GPS Radio Occultation with Hyperspectral Infrared and Microwave Sounder Assimilation

Assimilation of precipitation-related observations into global NWP models

Current Status of COMS AMV in NMSC/KMA

REGIONAL SPECIALIZED METEOROLOGICAL CENTRE (RSMC), EXETER, VOS MONITORING REPORT. (Submitted by Colin Parrett (United Kingdom), RSMC, Exeter)

Assimilation of GNSS Radio Occultation Data at JMA. Hiromi Owada, Yoichi Hirahara and Masami Moriya Japan Meteorological Agency

Document NWPSAF_EC_VS_027 Version /11/15

Satellite-derived Wind, Cloud, and Surface Products at Direct Broadcast Sites in the Antarctic and Arctic

IASI Level 2 Product Processing

Julia Figa-Saldaña. OVWST Meeting, May 2010, Barcelona Slide: 1

Transcription:

Does the ATOVS RARS Network Matter for Global NWP? Brett Candy, Nigel Atkinson & Stephen English Met Office, Exeter, United Kingdom 1. Introduction Along with other global numerical weather prediction centres, the Met Office routinely assimilates data from Regional ATOVS Retransmission (RARS) networks, such as the EARS service provided by EUMETSAT. Recently additional data has been made available for the Asia-Pacific and South American regions. In this study we investigate the forecast impact of using this data in addition to the standard global ATOVS datasets. We also examine the forecast benefit if all ATOVS data arrived in time to make the main forecast runs. This latter study gives insight into geographical areas in which extensions to the RARS network would be useful. 2. Sources of ATOVS data The main ATOVS data used at the Met Office are the global dumps arriving at the 1b level (antenna temperatures) from NOAA/NESDIS for NOAAs 15 to 18. Global MetOp data at the 1c level (brightness temperatures) arrives via EUMETCast. NOAA-18 1c data also is disseminated via this route and provides a level of robustness. In addition to these global streams, data from RARS stations arrives via ftp and EUMETCast at the 1c level. Data from each RARS station is routinely checked for the following: Consistency of brightness temperatures against global equivalent Consistency of navigation against global equivalent Data delay (time between the observation and its arrival in the Met Office database) Robustness how often does each station miss all available passes in 24 hours Monitoring of the above is available on an external website (see Section 6). Figure 1 shows an example of the brightness temperature consistency check. 3. Use of RARS data in Operations During a six hour assimilation window the volume of RARS data (from 17 stations) is typically in excess of 200000 observations. This is a large amount of data and so a duplicate check is applied prior to quality control and 1D-Var retrievals. Within this check observations from the same satellite that are within 20 km apart are considered duplicates, from which the global data is given preference. Consequently the RARS data is used to fill in regions where the global data did not arrive in time. At each analysis time (0, 6, 12, 18 UTC) two assimilation/forecast runs are performed, a main run and an update. The main run is the most time critical as the forecasts go out to two days, and at 0 and 12 UTC, to five days. Currently the main run starts 2 hours 45 minutes after the nominal analysis time, i.e. the 12 UTC run starts at 14:45 UTC. At six hours after the nominal analysis time an update run is performed, whose purpose is to provide a six hour forecast for the next cycle. Because of the time constraint it is in the main run analyses that we expect RARS data to be of most use, although it will also be of benefit in the update analyses should the global stream suffer an outage.

Figure 2 shows the RARS data that has passed the duplicate check for a series of main run. Note the large amount of NOAA-16 data which is being supplied by RARS. This is because over 24 hours several orbits from this platform suffer appreciable delays via the global stream. Once the duplicate check has been performed the global and RARS data streams are treated in an identical way through the pre-processing and assimilation, with the exception of channels from the HIRS instrument. These are rejected from RARS stations and not used in the assimilation step, due to the likelihood of missing calibration scans at the beginning and end Figure 1: The brightness temperature difference between RARS and the corresponding global data for AMSUA channel 15 mapped to the HIRS grid. The RARS ground station is Cachoeira Paulista in Brazil.

Figure 2: RARS data passing the duplicate check for 4 assimilation cycles. Key: Green NOAA-18, Blue NOAA-16. of the overpass, which can lead to significant differences in the brightness temperatures between the global and local streams for this instrument. Figure 3 shows that typically around 25% of the satellite observations made during each assimilation window do not arrive in time via the global stream to make the main forecast runs, though on several occasions the loss can be in excess of 40%. The current network of RARS stations helps to fill in and typically recovers around 30% of the missing data. 1.2 10 4 Number of NOAA18 amsua 14 obs assimilated 1.0 10 4 8.0 10 3 6.0 10 3 4.0 10 3 1213 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 December 2007 2008 Figure 3: The number of ATOVS observations assimilated from the NOAA-18 platform for main forecast runs during mid December 2007 to early January 2008. Key: Green data from global ATOVS dumps arriving in time, Blue- global dumps + 17 RARS stations, Red: ATOVS global data regardless of arrival time. 4. The Impact of RARS in NWP 4.1 Robustness Whilst the dissemination from NESDIS of the global stream is very reliable, there are occasional outages. In these cases RARS provides a useful backup as demonstrated by Figure

4 which shows the last occasion during which the global stream from NOAA platforms was unavailable. Figure 4: An example of the amount of ATOVS data assimilated if the global stream from NESDIS was unavailable. 4.2 RARS Forecast Impact Experiments In section 3 it was shown that a significant amount of ATOVS data is missing from the main forecast runs and so in the following section the impact of using this late data is investigated, along with an assessment of whether the RARS network can recover some of this impact. This work follows on from an earlier study by Candy et al. (2004) which demonstrated that the late ATOVS data does have a useful forecast impact of between 1 and 4% in the 500 hpa height in the extra-tropics. The study also showed evidence that some of this impact was recovered by using data from the EARS network. The investigation has been repeated as we now have a better distribution of RARS stations (Figure 5). However there are several factors which may result in a reduced impact from the late ATOVS data: 2004 study used AMSU data from three satellites (NOAAs-15, 16 & 17), in 2008 four satellites are assimilated (NOAA-16,17 (HIRS only),18 & MetOp-A). Svalbard downlink is now used for MetOp-A and certain orbits of NOAA-18 so timeliness of global stream improved for these platforms. In 2004 the sole satellite sounding information was provided by ATOVS, in 2008 AIRS, IASI & SSMIS are also operationally assimilated. In 2004 main run was started 2 hrs after analysis time, In 2008 this has been relaxed to 2 hrs 45 mins, so the amount of late data is reduced.

Figure 5: The RARS stations used in the 2004 study (top panel) and in the 2008 study (bottom panel) A control run of the global assimilation and forecast system was performed during mid- December 2007 to mid-january 2008 in which observations were assimilated as in operations, apart from ATOVS, which only used data from the global stream. All data arriving beyond a certain time limit was not used in the assimilation. This was set to 2 hrs 45 mins after the analysis time of each main run and mimics the operational schedule. Hereafter this run is referred to as ATOVSG. Two experiment runs were then performed: RARS. As ATOVSG and also RARS data from 17 stations for NOAAs 16 & 18. ALL ATOVS. As ATOVSG but the time limit is ignored for ATOVS observations only, i.e. all observations in the global stream are used regardless of their arrival time. The forecast impact of the RARS and All ATOVS experiments against the control is summarised in Figure 6. This shows the impact on pressure at mean sea level (PMSL) forecasts for both northern and southern extra-tropical regions. The impact of the late global stream data that does not make the main run forecasts is significant, particularly in the Southern Hemisphere. The impact from the current RARS network is smaller, although provides a useful impact at long range (beyond 72 hours) in the Southern Hemisphere. This impact is perhaps smaller than might be expected, however it should be noted that for the principle ATOVS satellites used at the Met Office the RARS service only supports NOAA16 & 18, as currently the MetOp satellite does not broadcast the HRPT stream.

All ATOVS RARS improvement in PMSL forecast error (%) 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0-0.5 Northern Hemisphere Southern Hemisphere 24 48 72 96 120 24 48 72 96 120 Forecast Time (Hours) Figure 6: The forecast impact in the All ATOVS and RARS experiments. Given the increasing number of RARS stations providing data it is instructive to examine the regions that are most sensitive to the late ATOVS data. In Figure 7 the RMS difference between the All ATOVS and ATOVSG main run analyses is shown. The largest differences are in the Southern Ocean and in the North Pacific regions and so it is potentially in these regions where further RARS stations would be of most benefit. All ATOVS - ATOVSG with operational cutoff pl 500 ht 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Figure 7: The RMS difference between the main run analyses at 12 UTC from the All ATOVS experiment and the ATOVSG control.

5. Conclusions The RARS network has grown considerably over the last four years and now contains stations in both hemispheres. Global coverage has grown from ~25% to ~60%. This increased coverage makes it a useful auxiliary source of data in global models, both for robustness should the global stream be interrupted, and to provide more observations in the time-critical main forecast runs. Experiments carried out during winter 2007/08 demonstrated that the late ATOVS data which does not make the main forecast runs has a significant forecast impact, even in an assimilation system that uses sounding data from several diverse systems such as AIRS and SSMIS. This shows that timeliness of the sounding data is still an important issue and use of the RARS network helps to recover some of the lost impact, particularly in the Southern Hemisphere. Analyses appear to be most sensitive to the late ATOVS data in the Southern Ocean and North Pacific regions. Data from Argentina and the Antarctic Peninsula are also now available, while further expansion is expected during 2008 and 2009 e.g. Hawaii, Fiji and La Réunion. These will be added at the earliest opportunity to the 17 RARS stations already used in Met Office operations. 6. References and Websites B. Candy, A. Doherty, S. English & R. Saunders: 2004. The Use of EARS Data at The Met Office. In Proc. of the 2004 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Conference, Prague, Czech Republic. NWP SAF Regional and Global ATOVS intercomparison Website: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/interproj/nwpsaf/index.html