Machine Foundation Analysis VERIFICATION MANUAL REV D

Similar documents
Prob. 1 SDOF Structure subjected to Ground Shaking

Chapter 2: Rigid Bar Supported by Two Buckled Struts under Axial, Harmonic, Displacement Excitation..14

Chapter a. Spring constant, k : The change in the force per unit length change of the spring. b. Coefficient of subgrade reaction, k:

NUMERICAL MODELLING OF RUBBER VIBRATION ISOLATORS

ON THE PREDICTION OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS FROM TWO PILE TESTS UNDER FORCED VIBRATIONS

CIVL 8/7117 Chapter 12 - Structural Dynamics 1/75. To discuss the dynamics of a single-degree-of freedom springmass

Structural Dynamics Lecture 2. Outline of Lecture 2. Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems (cont.)

Active Impact Sound Isolation with Floating Floors. Gonçalo Fernandes Lopes

Chapter 14 Oscillations. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Dynamics of structures

Vibrations Qualifying Exam Study Material

Structural System, Machines and Load Cases

Computational Simulation of Dynamic Response of Vehicle Tatra T815 and the Ground

Chapter 14 Oscillations

Varuvan Vadivelan. Institute of Technology LAB MANUAL. : 2013 : B.E. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING : III Year / V Semester. Regulation Branch Year & Semester

Influence of the Soil Structure Interaction on the Fundamental Period of Large Dynamic Machine Foundation

Dynamic Soil Structure Interaction

Mechatronics. MANE 4490 Fall 2002 Assignment # 1

APPROXIMATE DYNAMIC MODEL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR LARGE, COMPLEX SPACE STRUCTURES. Timothy S. West, Senior Engineer

Chapter 14 Oscillations. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

COMPLEX MODULUS AND DAMPING MEASUREMENTS USING RESONANT AND NON-RESONANT METHODS

Structural Dynamics. Spring mass system. The spring force is given by and F(t) is the driving force. Start by applying Newton s second law (F=ma).

Vibrations of Machine Foundations

UNITS AND DEFINITIONS RELATED TO BIOMECHANICAL AND ELECTROMYOGRAPHICAL MEASUREMENTS

Advanced Vibrations. Elements of Analytical Dynamics. By: H. Ahmadian Lecture One

k 21 k 22 k 23 k 24 k 31 k 32 k 33 k 34 k 41 k 42 k 43 k 44

Dynamic Analysis Contents - 1

Foundation Engineering Dr. Priti Maheshwari Department Of Civil Engineering Indian Institute Of Technology, Roorkee

This equation of motion may be solved either by differential equation method or by graphical method as discussed below:

EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF STRUCTURES

NONLINEAR CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PILE-SOIL SYSTEM UNDER VERTICAL VIBRATION

A Circular Cavity Embedded in a Full-Plane Under Impulse Pressure

Oscillations. Phys101 Lectures 28, 29. Key points: Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM) SHM Related to Uniform Circular Motion The Simple Pendulum

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002

Dynamic Analysis of Pile Foundations: Effects of Material Nonlinearity of Soil

Introduction to Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

*Definition of Mechanics *Basic Concepts *Newton s Laws *Units

557. Radial correction controllers of gyroscopic stabilizer

Analyses of Soil-Structure Systems

Sound radiation and sound insulation

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PILES IN SAND BASED ON SOIL-PILE INTERACTION

NONLINEAR STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS USING FE METHODS

Modal analysis of shear buildings

Structural Dynamics Lecture 4. Outline of Lecture 4. Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems. Formulation of Equations of Motions. Undamped Eigenvibrations.

Response Spectrum Analysis Shock and Seismic. FEMAP & NX Nastran

WORK SHEET FOR MEP311

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each.

Vibration analysis of compressor piping system with fluid pulsation

Design Procedures For Dynamically Loaded Foundations

SHOCK RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS VIA THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD Revision C

ME 563 HOMEWORK # 5 SOLUTIONS Fall 2010

Effect of Soil-Foundation Interaction on the Dynamic Response of a Four-Cylinder Compressor Foundation

Chap. 15: Simple Harmonic Motion

T1 T e c h n i c a l S e c t i o n

DEVELOPMENT OF ACTIVELY TUNED VIBRATION ABSORBER FOR WASHING MACHINE

Theoretical Manual Theoretical background to the Strand7 finite element analysis system

Explosion Protection of Buildings

18.12 FORCED-DAMPED VIBRATIONS

TWO-STAGE ISOLATION FOR HARMONIC BASE EXCITATION Revision A. By Tom Irvine February 25, 2008

NON-LINEAR VISCOELASTIC MODEL OF STRUCTURAL POUNDING

PLANAR KINETICS OF A RIGID BODY: WORK AND ENERGY Today s Objectives: Students will be able to: 1. Define the various ways a force and couple do work.

Final Exam December 13, 2016

SHAKE TABLE STUDY OF SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION EFFECTS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE AND ADJACENT BUILDINGS

Strength Study of Spiral Flexure Spring of Stirling Cryocooler

Dynamics Manual. Version 7

MODELLING OF VIBRATION WITH ABSORBER

Structure Design and Modal Analysis for a New Type of Cycloidal Drives

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURES CONSIDERING SOIL-PILE-STRUCTURE INTERACTION

Engineering Science OUTCOME 2 - TUTORIAL 3 FREE VIBRATIONS

1. Multiple Degree-of-Freedom (MDOF) Systems: Introduction

LANMARK UNIVERSITY OMU-ARAN, KWARA STATE DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING COURSE: MECHANICS OF MACHINE (MCE 322). LECTURER: ENGR.

Determination of dynamic soil characteristics and transfer functions to support the evaluation of the efficiency of vibration mitigation measures

STIFFNESS AND DAMPING OF SOIL-PILE SYSTEM IN LIQUEFACTION PROCESS

Introduction to Continuous Systems. Continuous Systems. Strings, Torsional Rods and Beams.

MASS LOADING EFFECTS FOR HEAVY EQUIPMENT AND PAYLOADS Revision F

MODELING AND FEM ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF THERMALLY OPTIMAL COMPOSITE MATERIALS

3. Overview of MSC/NASTRAN

Lecture 31. EXAMPLES: EQUATIONS OF MOTION USING NEWTON AND ENERGY APPROACHES

Final Exam Solution Dynamics :45 12:15. Problem 1 Bateau

Embedded Foundation with Different Parameters under Dynamic Excitations

Address for Correspondence

Modal and Static Structural Analysis of Exhaust Collector Box for Compressor test facility

COEFFICIENT OF DYNAMIC HORIZONTAL SUBGRADE REACTION OF PILE FOUNDATIONS ON PROBLEMATIC GROUND IN HOKKAIDO Hirofumi Fukushima 1

ROTATING RING. Volume of small element = Rdθbt if weight density of ring = ρ weight of small element = ρrbtdθ. Figure 1 Rotating ring

Rigid Part Mating. Goals of this class

3-D FINITE ELEMENT NONLINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS FOR SOIL-PILE-STRUCTURE INTERACTION

MEC3403. Dynamics II. Introductory book. Faculty of Engineering and Surveying

RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF PEAK FLOOR ACCELERATION DEMAND

Integration simulation method concerning speed control of ultrasonic motor

Introduction to Mechanical Vibration

Chapter 5. Vibration Analysis. Workbench - Mechanical Introduction ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.

A Guide to linear dynamic analysis with Damping

Software Verification

ABSTRACT. Ossama Salem Ali Ahmed, Ph.D., interaction of the pile with the surrounding soils under vibratory loading will modify

Experimental Study of Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction by using Large Geotechnical Centrifuge System

On The Finite Element Modeling Of Turbo Machinery Rotors In Rotor Dynamic Analysis

Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

Research on Optimization of Bearing Span of Main Reducer Gear System Based on the Transfer Matrix

Graphical User Interface (GUI) for Torsional Vibration Analysis of Rotor Systems Using Holzer and MatLab Techniques

EQUIVALENT FRACTURE ENERGY CONCEPT FOR DYNAMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF PROTOTYPE RC GIRDERS

Transcription:

Machine Foundation Analysis VERIFICATION MANUAL REV. 12.1-D TM

Page:2 COPYRIGHT The computer program CLOCKWORK and all associated documentation are proprietary and copyrighted products. Worldwide rights of ownership rest with NEWTONIAN MACHINES. Unlicensed use of the program or reproduction of the documentation in any form, without prior written authorization from NEWTONIAN MACHINES is explicitly prohibited. NEWTONIAN MACHINES ANDRÉS DE FUENZALIDA 147 PROVIDENCIA, SANTIAGO, CHILE Tel: (+56 2) 2 23553800 Email: contact@newtonianmachines.com Web: http://www.newtonianmachines.com

Page:3 CONTENT I. INTRODUCTION... 4 1. TEST CASE 1... 5 2. TEST CASE 2... 7 3. TEST CASE 3... 9 4. TEST CASE 4... 11 5. TEST CASE 5... 14

Page:4 I. INTRODUCTION Clockwork is a foundation design and analysis software, based on well-known and internationally accepted theories. This document provides example problems from recognized publications in order to verify the achievement of accuracy and acceptable results. However and by the nature of this software, it is difficult to find suitable examples for this verification manual since most publications are conceived to be a guide for engineers by doing hand calculations, aside from the laborious task that it is for example calculate a structure with six degree of freedom, natural frequencies for a coupled system, intricate periodic loads, etc. The analyzed tests in this manual are just a small part of the rigorous tests that our developers run in the testing stage to ensure the quality of Clockwork.

Page:5 1. TEST CASE 1 Dynamic load of single-cylinder compressor. a. Overview Reference: [1] Foundation Vibration Analysis Using Simple Physical Models, John P. Wolf, pg. 56., ISBN: 0-13-010711-5 Dynamic Load Type: Periodic Excitation Units: tonnef / m b. Problem Description On a rigid block foundation rests a reciprocating machine composed of a compressor and a driving motor, which generates a vertical unbalanced dynamic load with two components. The first component acts at a frequency of 9Hz and the second component at twice this frequency. The resulting dynamic total load it is represented by P(t) (Fig.1.1). c. Input Parameters Compressor and driving motor mass = Dynamic Load Total load acts vertically on the foundation block. Total Load P(t) = Total Load Operation Frequency = 9 Hz Number of terms used in Fourier Series = 20 Fig. 1.1 Dynamic total load from vertical single-cylinder compressor.

Page:6 Rigid Foundation Block Size Length = 2.0 m Width = 1.5 m Height = 1.0 m Soil Poisson s Ratio µ = 0.33 Specific Mass Density ρ = d. Analysis Shear Modulus G = For this analysis the Cone method it is used in Clockwork. e. Results Comparison Measured Value Clockwork Displacement Ref[1] Displacement [mm] [mm] Lower Peak -0.01206-0.01125 ± 0.00125* Higher Peak 0.02072 0.02125 ± 0.00125* * Displacement value from Fig. XX [1] Fig1.2 - Dynamic vertical displacement from Clockwork results.

Page:7 2. TEST CASE 2 Dynamic load of weaver s loom. a. Overview Reference: [1] Foundation Vibration Analysis Using Simple Physical Models, John P. Wolf, pg. 56, ISBN: 0130107115 Dynamic Load Type: Periodic Excitation Units: tonnef / m b. Problem Description On a rigid block foundation rests a weaver s loom operating at 9Hz with a mass of 2750kg. In this case the load is expressed as a Fourier series with 20 terms (Fig 2.1). c. Input Parameters Weaver s loom mass = Dynamic Load Load acts vertically on the foundation block. Vertical Load P(t) Fig 2.1 Dynamic vertical load from weaver s loom. Load Operation Frequency = 9 Hz up to 180 Hz Number of terms used in Fourier Series = 20

Page:8 Rigid Foundation Block Size Length = 2.0 m Width = 1.5 m Height = 1.0 m Soil Poisson s Ratio µ = 0.33 Mass Density ρ = d. Analysis Shear Modulus G = For this analysis the Cone method it is used in Clockwork e. Results Comparison Measured Value Clockwork Displacement Ref[1] Displacement [mm] [mm] Lower Peak -0.015956-0.015625±0.000625* Higher Peak 0.008334 0.008±0.000750* * Displacement value from Fig. 2-14 [1] Fig 2.2 Dynamic vertical displacement from Clockwork results.

Page:9 3. TEST CASE 3 Vertical single-cylinder compressor. a. Overview Reference: [2] Vibration of Soils and Foundations, F. E. Richart, Jr., pg. 360. ISBN: 0139417168 Dynamic Load Type: Harmonic Excitation Measured Units: lbf / ft b. Problem Description c. Input Parameters Weight * f compressor = Dynamic Load Load acts vertically on the foundation block. Vertical Load = Fig. 3.1 Dynamic vertical load Load Operation Frequency = 7.5 Hz

Page:10 Rigid Foundation Block Size Length = 16 ft Width = 7 ft Height = 3 ft Soil Poisson s Ratio µ = 0.33 Mass Density ρ = d. Analysis Shear Modulus G = For this analysis all available methods were used in Clockwork. e. Results Comparison Measured Clockwork Displacement Displacement Ref[2] Value [in] Zero to Peak 0.0001595 [ft] 0.001908 [in] 0.0019

Page:11 4. TEST CASE 4 a. OVERVIEW The Foundation from Fig 4.1 was subjected to six load cases in order to compare results using SAP2000 and Clockwork. Dynamic Load Type: Harmonic Excitation Units: SI Damping and Group Effect were not considered. a. PROBLEM DESCRIPTION A square foundation is loaded on one of its edges and on the geometric center of gravity of the soil contact area. b. PARAMETERS FOUNDATION PARAMETERS Number of Piles 4 Pile Diameter Foundation Height Foundation Length Foundation Width 400 mm 1000 mm 3000 mm 3000 mm Specific Weight 2500 kgf/m 3 Soil Stiffness 80 kgf/cm 2 Foundation Weight 22500 kgf PILES LOCATION X - mm Y - mm Pile 1 500 500 Pile 2 500 2500 Pile 3 2500 500 Pile 4 2500 2500 Fig 4. 1 Pile Foundation on SAP2000 CASE Location Load Location Load X Y Z tonf mm mm mm 1 X 35 0 3000 1000 2 Y 35 0 3000 1000 3 Z -35 0 3000 1000 4 X 35 1500 1500 0 5 Y 35 1500 1500 0 6 Z -35 1500 1500 0

Page:12 c. RESULTS - SAP2000 v15 Measured Points Displacements Angular Displacements CASE X Y Z u1 u2 u3 θ1 θ2 θ3 mm mm mm m m m rad rad rad 1 0 2500 1000 4,77E-04 2,29E-04 4,00E-05 0 2,70E-05-1,52E-04 2 0 2500 1000 2,29E-04 4,77E-04-4,00E-05-2,70E-05 0-1,52E-04 3 0 2500 1000-4,00E-05 4,00E-05-8,90E-05-2,40E-05-2,40E-05 0 4 0 2500 1000 2,21E-04 0 1,60E-05 0 1,10E-05 0 5 0 2500 1000 0 2,21E-04-1,60E-05-1,10E-05 0 0 6 0 2500 1000 0 0-1,70E-05 0 0 0 1 1500 1500 0 2,21E-04 0 0 0 2,70E-05-1,52E-04 2 1500 1500 0 0 2,21E-04 0-2,70E-05 0-1,52E-04 3 1500 1500 0-1,60E-05 1,60E-05-1,70E-05-2,40E-05-2,40E-05 0 4 1500 1500 0 2,10E-04 0 0 0 1,10E-05 0 5 1500 1500 0 0 2,10E-04 0-1,10E-05 0 0 6 1500 1500 0 0 0-1,70E-05 0 0 0 RESULTS - CLOCKWORK v12 Measured Points Displacements Angular Displacements CASE X Y Z u1 u2 u3 θ1 θ2 θ3 mm mm mm m m m rad rad rad 1 0 2500 1000 4,76E-04 2,28E-04 4,01E-05 0 2,67E-05-1,52E-04 2 0 2500 1000 2,28E-04 4,76E-04-4,01E-05-2,67E-05 0-1,52E-04 3 0 2500 1000-4,01E-05 4,01E-05-8,85E-05-2,39E-05-2,39E-05 0 4 0 2500 1000 2,21E-04 0 1,61E-05 0 1,07E-05 0 5 0 2500 1000 0 2,21E-04-1,61E-05-1,07E-05 0 0 6 0 2500 1000 0 0-1,65E-05 0 0 0 1 1500 1500 0 2,21E-04 0 0 0 2,67E-05-1,52E-04 2 1500 1500 0 0 2,21E-04 0-2,67E-05 0-1,52E-04 3 1500 1500 0-1,61E-05 1,61E-05-1,65E-05-2,39E-05-2,39E-05 0 4 1500 1500 0 2,10E-04 0 0 0 1,07E-05 0 5 1500 1500 0 0 2,10E-04 0-1,07E-05 0 0 6 1500 1500 0 0 0-1,65E-05 0 0 0 Fig 4.2 Pile Foundation on Clockwork 12

Page:13 Porcentual Difference of Results between SAP2000 and Clockwork Measured Point Location Displacements Angular Displacements CASE X Y Z u1 u2 u3 θ1 θ2 θ3 mm mm mm m m m rad rad rad 1 0 2500 1000 0,21% 0,44% 0,25% 0,00% 1,11% 0,00% 2 0 2500 1000 0,44% 0,21% 0,25% 1,11% 0,00% 0,00% 3 0 2500 1000 0,25% 0,25% 0,56% 0,42% 0,42% 0,00% 4 0 2500 1000 0,00% 0,00% 0,62% 0,00% 2,73% 0,00% 5 0 2500 1000 0,00% 0,00% 0,62% 2,73% 0,00% 0,00% 6 0 2500 1000 0,00% 0,00% 2,94% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 1 1500 1500 0 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 1,11% 0,00% 2 1500 1500 0 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 1,11% 0,00% 0,00% 3 1500 1500 0 0,62% 0,62% 2,94% 0,42% 0,42% 0,00% 4 1500 1500 0 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 2,73% 0,00% 5 1500 1500 0 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 2,73% 0,00% 0,00% 6 1500 1500 0 0,00% 0,00% 2,94% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00%

Page:14 5. TEST CASE 5 a. OVERVIEW The Foundation from Fig 5.1 was subjected to six load cases in order to compare results using SAP2000 and Clockwork. Dynamic Load Type: Harmonic Excitation Units: SI Damping and Group Effect were not considered b. PROBLEM DESCRIPTION A square foundation is loaded on one of its edges and on the geometric center of gravity of the soil contact area. c. PARAMETERS FOUNDATION PARAMETERS Piles: 6 Pile Diameter: 400 mm Block 1 - Height: 1500 mm Block 1 - Length: 2000 mm Block 1 - Width: 3000 mm Block 2 - Height: 2500 mm Block 2 - Length: 3000 mm Block 2 - Width: 3000 mm Reinf. Concrete Specific Weight 2500 kgf/m 3 Peso fundación : 78,75 kgf Soil Stiffness 80 kgf/cm 2 Fig 5. 1 Pile Foundation on SAP2000 Fig 5. 2 Pile Foundation on Clockwork 12

Page:15 PILES LOCATION X mm Y mm CASE Location Load tonf X mm Y mm Pile 1 : 500 750 Pile 2 : 500 2250 Pile 3 : 2500 750 Pile 4 : 2500 2250 Pile 5 : 4500 750 Pile 6 : 4500 2250 1 X 35 0 3000 2 Y 35 0 3000 3 Z -35 0 3000 4 X 35 2500 1500 5 Y 35 2500 1500 6 Z -35 2500 1500 RESULTS SAP2000 v15 Measured Points Displacements Angular Displacements Caso X Y Z u1 u2 u3 θ1 θ2 θ3 mm mm mm m m m rad rad rad 1 0 3000 1000 2,49E-04 1,57E-04 2,20E-05 0 8,87E-06-6,30E-05 2 0 3000 1000 1,57E-04 4,84E-04-6,00E-05-4,00E-05 0-1,05E-04 3 0 3000 1000-2,20E-05 6,00E-05-7,80E-05-2,80E-05-1,00E-05 0 4 0 3000 1000 1,41E-04 0 6,84E-06 0 2,73E-06 0 5 0 3000 1000 0 1,62E-04-1,80E-05-1,20E-05 0 0 6 0 3000 1000 0 0-1,10E-05 0 0 0 1 2500 1500 0 1,41E-04 0 0 0 8,87E-06-6,30E-05 2 2500 1500 0 0 1,62E-04 0-4,00E-05 0-1,05E-04 3 2500 1500 0-6,84E-06 1,80E-05-1,10E-05-2,80E-05-1,00E-05 0 4 2500 1500 0 1,37E-04 0 0 0 2,73E-06 0 5 2500 1500 0 0 1,44E-04 0-1,20E-05 0 0 6 2500 1500 0 0 0-1,10E-05 0 0 0 RESULTS - CLOCKWORK v12 Measured Points Displacements Angular Displacements Caso X Y Z u1 u2 u3 θ1 θ2 θ3 mm mm mm m m m rad rad rad 1 0 3000 1000 2,49E-04 1,57E-04 2,22E-05 0 8,88E-06-6,29E-05 2 0 3000 1000 1,57E-04 4,84E-04-6,01E-05-4,00E-05 0-1,04E-04 3 0 3000 1000-2,22E-05 6,00E-05-7,80E-05-2,76E-05-1,02E-05 0 4 0 3000 1000 1,41E-04 0 6,87E-06 0 2,75E-06 0 5 0 3000 1000 0 1,62E-04-1,86E-05-1,24E-05 0 0 6 0 3000 1000 0 0-1,10E-05 0 0 0 1 2500 1500 0 1,41E-04 0 0 0 8,88E-06-6,29E-05 2 2500 1500 0 0 1,62E-04 0-4,00E-05 0-1,04E-04 3 2500 1500 0-6,87E-06 1,86E-05-1,10E-05-2,76E-05-1,02E-05 0 4 2500 1500 0 1,37E-04 0 0 0 2,75E-06 0 5 2500 1500 0 0 1,43E-04 0-1,24E-05 0 0 6 2500 1500 0 0 0-1,10E-05 0 0 0

Page:16