Flag Manifolds and Representation Theory. Winter School on Homogeneous Spaces and Geometric Representation Theory

Similar documents
A relative version of Kostant s theorem

Eigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 28 Jan 2009

LINEAR CYCLE SPACES IN FLAG DOMAINS. Joseph A. Wolf and Roger Zierau. March 19, Section 1. Introduction.

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

The Spinor Representation

A PROOF OF BOREL-WEIL-BOTT THEOREM

COHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II

Mathematical Research Letters 7, (2000)

Injectivity of the Double Fibration Transform for Cycle Spaces of Flag Domains

Non-classical flag domains and Spencer resolutions

Contents. Chapter 3. Local Rings and Varieties Rings of Germs of Holomorphic Functions Hilbert s Basis Theorem 39.

Rigid Schubert classes in compact Hermitian symmetric spaces

A GEOMETRIC JACQUET FUNCTOR

Characterization of smooth Schubert varieties in rational homogeneous manifolds of Picard number 1

ON ORBIT CLOSURES OF SYMMETRIC SUBGROUPS IN FLAG VARIETIES

Determinant Functions and the Geometry of the Flag Manifold for SU(p,q)

Representation theory and the X-ray transform

Symplectic varieties and Poisson deformations

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

Twisted Sheaves on Flag Varieties: sl(2, C) Calculations

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

Minimal surfaces in quaternionic symmetric spaces

Kähler manifolds and variations of Hodge structures

GEODESIC ORBIT METRICS ON COMPACT SIMPLE LIE GROUPS ARISING FROM FLAG MANIFOLDS

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

THE WEYL CHARACTER FORMULA

Homogeneous spaces admitting transitive semigroups

Dolbeault cohomology and. stability of abelian complex structures. on nilmanifolds

Equivariant Algebraic K-Theory

Representation Theory and Orbital Varieties. Thomas Pietraho Bowdoin College

Complex Geometry and Representations of Lie Groups

IVAN LOSEV. Lemma 1.1. (λ) O. Proof. (λ) is generated by a single vector, v λ. We have the weight decomposition (λ) =

Geometry of symmetric R-spaces

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

Uniform K-stability of pairs

Rigidity of Harmonic Maps of Maximum Rank

12 Geometric quantization

Defining equations for some nilpotent varieties

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions

Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.

BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)

PART I: GEOMETRY OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

TORI INVARIANT UNDER AN INVOLUTORIAL AUTOMORPHISM II

TitleOn manifolds with trivial logarithm. Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 41(2)

SARA BILLEY AND IZZET COSKUN

Lectures on the Orbit Method

arxiv:alg-geom/ v1 29 Jul 1993

C*-Algebras and Group Representations

EKT of Some Wonderful Compactifications

Quaternionic Complexes

Classification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO

On the Harish-Chandra Embedding

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 17 Apr 2015

Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces

NOTES ON HOLOMORPHIC PRINCIPAL BUNDLES OVER A COMPACT KÄHLER MANIFOLD

THE QUANTUM CONNECTION

Twisted Harish-Chandra sheaves and Whittaker modules: The nondegenerate case

Uniformization in several complex variables.

About polynomiality of the Poisson semicentre for parabolic subalgebras

Hermitian Symmetric Domains

NEW REALIZATIONS OF THE MAXIMAL SATAKE COMPACTIFICATIONS OF RIEMANNIAN SYMMETRIC SPACES OF NON-COMPACT TYPE. 1. Introduction and the main results

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Weights

Fixed Point Theorem and Character Formula

arxiv: v2 [math.gt] 21 Dec 2018

Contributors. Preface

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 31 Oct 2008

HOMOGENEOUS VECTOR BUNDLES

QUATERNIONIC-LIKE MANIFOLDS AND HOMOGENEOUS TWISTOR SPACES. This paper is dedicated to the 150th anniversary of the Romanian Academy.

Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry 18: , Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.

Hodge Theory of Maps

The Weyl Character Formula

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

Published as: Math. Ann. 295 (1993)

GENERALIZING THE LOCALIZATION FORMULA IN EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY

Parabolic subgroups Montreal-Toronto 2018

The Structure of Compact Groups

arxiv: v4 [math.kt] 9 Apr 2014

PREFACE TO THE DOVER EDITION

On exceptional completions of symmetric varieties

Primitive Ideals and Unitarity

Geometry of multiplicity-free representations of GL(n), visible actions on flag varieties, and triunity

LECTURES ON EQUIVARIANT LOCALIZATION

On the Hilbert polynomials and Hilbert series of homogeneous projective varieties Benedict H. Gross and Nolan R. Wallach 1

The Grothendieck-Katz Conjecture for certain locally symmetric varieties

Notes on Partial Resolutions of Nilpotent Varieties by Borho and Macpherson

Littlewood Richardson coefficients for reflection groups

ON THE CHIEF FACTORS OF PARABOLIC MAXIMAL SUBGROUPS IN FINITE SIMPLE GROUPS OF NORMAL LIE TYPE

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Complex Structures

WEAKLY COMPLEX HOMOGENEOUS SPACES

The Poisson Embedding Problem

Birational geometry and deformations of nilpotent orbits

Positively curved GKM manifolds

ON THE TOPOLOGY OF KAC-MOODY GROUPS CONTENTS

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

Transcription:

Flag Manifolds and Representation Theory Winter School on Homogeneous Spaces and Geometric Representation Theory Lecture I. Real Groups and Complex Flags 28 February 2012 Joseph A. Wolf University of California at Berkeley p. 1

Parabolic Subalgebras G: conn. simply conn. complex semisimple Lie group g: the Lie algebra of G H: Cartan subgroup (centralizer of a Cartan subalg. h) Σ = Σ(g,h): root system, so g = h+ α Σ g α Σ + = Σ(g,h) + is a choice of positive root system Ψ = Ψ(g,h): simple system of roots for Σ + Φ is an arbitrary subset of Ψ q = q Φ := q nilp +q red parabolic subalgebra where q nilp = Σ + \ Φ g α is its nilradical and q red = h+ Φ g α is the Levi (reductive) component Notation example: p. 2

Parabolic Subgroups Q = Q Φ = {g G Ad(g)q = q}: parabolic subgroup of G. A parabolic subgroup is its own normalizer Each G conjugacy class of parabolic subgroups contains just one of the 2 #Ψ groups Q Φ Extremes: Q is a Borel subgroup and Q Ψ = G Let π λ be an irreducible finite dimensional representation of G of highest weight λ. Let v λ be a highest weight vector and Φ = {ψ Ψ λ,ψ = 0}. Then Q Φ is the G stabilizer of the line v λ C. In the action of G on the assoc. complex projective space, Q Φ is the isotropy subgroup of G at [v λ ]. Let G 0 be a real form of G. Then parabolic subgroup of G 0 means a subgroup that is a real form of a parabolic subgroup of G. p. 3

Complex Flag Manifolds the Z = G/Q, Q parabolic in G, are the complex flag manifolds Q z and q z : isotropies of G and g at z Z G u : compact real form of G can assume that H u := G u H is a maximal torus in G u fact: G u Q is the centralizer of a subtorus of H u and is a compact real form L u of the reductive part Q red of Q. Complex flag manifolds Z = G/Q = G u /L u are characterized by any of Z = G/Q is a complex homogeneous projective variety Z = G u /L u is a compact simply connected homogeneous Kähler manifold Z = G u /L u where L u is the centralizer of a torus p. 4

Homogeneous Vector Bundles In general: let A/B be a homogeneous space and β : B End(E β ) a linear representation Define E β = A β E β where A β E β = (A E β )/{(ab,v) = (a,β(b)v)} for a A,b B. Then µ : E β A/B, by µ[a,v] = ab, is an A homogeneous vector bundle with typical fiber E β on which B acts by β Sections are given by f : A E β with f(ab) = β(b) 1 f(a). This works w/o change in the categories C 0, C k and C. For the holomorphic category, one must define a complex structure on E β for which there are sufficiently many local holomorphic sections. This means local sections annihilated by antiholomorphic vector fields on A/B. p. 5

Borel Weil Theorem Again, G is a connected complex semisimple Lie group, Q is a parabolic subgroup and Z = G/Q complex flag τ λ is an irreducible representation of Q with highest weight λ and representation space E λ E λ Z = G/Q is the associated homogeneous holomorphic vector bundle and O(E λ ) Z is the sheaf of germs of holomorphic sections. Borel Weil Theorem. Let H 0 (Z;O(E λ )) denote the space of global holomorphic sections of E λ Z. If λ is Σ + dominant, i.e. λ,ψ 0 for all ψ Ψ, then the action of G on the H 0 (Z;O(E λ )) is the irreducible representation of G with highest weight λ. p. 6

Proof of Borel Weil Recall q = q red +q nil with g u q = l u where l = q red. { Λ := ν h 2 ν,ψ ψ,ψ }, integer 0 highest weights ν of irreducible representations π ν of G. H 0 (Z;O(E λ )) = (L 2 (G u /L u ) E λ ) qnil = ν Λ ((V ν Vν E λ ) l ) qnil = ν Λ ((V ν Vν E λ ) qnil ) l using the Peter Weyl Theorem and because l = q red normalizes q nil = ν Λ (V ν (V ν E λ ) qnil ) l = ν Λ (V ν E ν E λ ) l because q nil ignores E λ and pushes V ν to E ν = ν Λ V ν (E ν E λ ) l = V λ as G module. p. 7

Bott Borel Weil Theorem W = W g,h : Weyl group, generated by reflections in the roots, w α : ν ν 2 ν,α α,α α ρ: half the sum of the positive roots if w W then length l(w) = #{α Σ + w(α) Σ + } if λ h nonsingular (λ α for α Σ) then q(λ) = l(w) where w = w λ W s.t. w(λ),α > 0 for every α Σ + Bott Borel Weil Theorem Let λ h, highest weight of a representation τ λ of Q, defining E λ Z. If λ+ρ is singular then every H q (Z;O(E λ )) = 0. If λ+ρ is nonsingular then H q (Z;O(E λ )) = 0 for q q(λ+ρ), and H q(λ+ρ) (Z;O(E λ )) is the irreducible G module of highest weight w λ+ρ (λ+ρ) ρ. p. 8

Proofs Bott s proof of the Bott Borel Weil Theorem combines the Borel Weil Theorem, the Leray spectral sequence, and the Kodaira Vanishing Theorem. It is an analytic proof based on the theory of compact Kähler manifolds. Kostant s proof is based more on the structure of parabolic subalgebras q g (new at the time) and his idea of looking at Lie algebra cohomology. More recent proofs are based on Lie algebra cohomology and/or the Bernstein Gelfand Gelfand resolution of certain modules Because of time constraints that s all I ll say about it. p. 9

Real Group Orbits G 0 : real form of G Q z Q z and q z q z : complexifications of real isotropies G 0 Q z and g 0 q z fact: g 0 q z contains a Cartan subalgebra of g 0 consequence: only finitely many G 0 orbits on Z consequence: G 0 has open orbits on Z if G 0 (z) is open then Cartan H 0 G 0 Q z is fundamental (maximally compact for CSG of G 0 ) If H 0 G 0 Q z is a fundamental Cartan denote W(g,h) h 0 = {w W(g,h) w(h 0 ) = h 0 } open orbits are given by a double coset space of the Weyl group, W(g 0,h 0 )\W(g,h)/W(g,h) h 0 p. 10

Examples G 0 = SU(p,q) defined by h(z,w) = p 1 z iw i q 1 z p+iw p+i Z = {q dim subspaces of C p+q } G 0 orbits given by signature (+, ) of h Open: D i = {z Z signh z = (i,q i)} D 0 = {W C p q I WW >> 0} bounded symmetric domain Closed: S = {z Z nullh z = min(p,q)} Bergman-Shilov boundary of D 0 Z = CP n and G 0 = SL(n+1;R). Orbits: G 0 (u+iv) with u,v R n+1 If u,v linearly independent: open orbit G 0 ([e 1 + 1e 2 ]) If u,v linearly dependent: closed orbit G 0 ([e 1 ]) p. 11

Compact Subvarieties D = G 0 (z): open G 0 orbit on Z = G/Q K 0 : maximal compact subgroup of G 0 C 0 : unique K 0 orbit on D that is a complex submanifold Properties: Can assume C 0 = K 0 (z). Then the base cycle C 0 = K(z) = K/(K Q) is a flag manifold The cycle space M D of D is the component of C 0 in {gc 0 g G and gc 0 D} M D is a contractible Stein manifold of known structure Suppose that G 0 /K 0 is a bounded symmetric domain B. Then M D is B or B (hermitian holomorphic case) or B B (hermitian non holomorphic case) More precisely: p. 12

Hermitian Types Let G 0 be simple and of hermitian type: the symmetric space G 0 /K 0 is an irreducible bounded symmetric domain B. If D is of holomorphic type in the sense that µ and ν in the double fibration µ G 0 /(Q r 0 K 0) ν D = G 0 /Q r 0 B = G 0 /K 0 can be made simultaneously holomorphic, then M D is holomorphically equivalent to B or to B. If D is of nonholomorphic type in the sense that µ and ν cannot be made simultaneously holomorphic, then M D = B B. p. 13