CHAPTER 3 HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION. Editors: Mr Mohamed Ezani Md. Taib Dato Dr David Chew Soon Ping Dr Ashari Yunus

Similar documents
CHAPTER 3 HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION. Editors: Mr Mohamed Ezani Md. Taib Dato Dr David Chew Soon Ping Dr Ashari Yunus

CHAPTER 8. Editors: Dr Omar Sulaiman Dr Hooi Lai Seong

CHAPTER 8 DECEASED (CADAVERIC) ORGAN AND TISSUE DONATION. Editor: Datin Dr Fadilah Zowyah Lela Yasmin Mansor Dr Hooi Lai Seong

Indications and outcomes after UD HSCT

Supplementary Online Content

Lecture 7 Time-dependent Covariates in Cox Regression

Srdan Verstovsek, MD, PhD Professor, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Initial Certification

DEATHS. In 2011, Florida resident deaths increased to 172,856. This is a 0.2 percent increase from 2010.

January NCCTG Protocol No: N0927 Opened: September 3, 2009

Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant Crossword Puzzle on Discharge Education

. In 2009, Florida resident deaths decreased to 169,854. This is a 0.4 percent decrease from 2008.

Multistate models in survival and event history analysis

Deep Temporal Generative Models of. Rahul Krishnan, Uri Shalit, David Sontag

Philip J Cimo DDS PA 650 West Bough Lane Ste #160 Houston TX

McGill University. Faculty of Science MATH 204 PRINCIPLES OF STATISTICS II. Final Examination

Individualized Treatment Effects with Censored Data via Nonparametric Accelerated Failure Time Models

CHART D-1: RESIDENT DEATHS AND RATES PER 100,000 POPULATION, BY RACE AND GENDER, FLORIDA AND UNITED STATES, CENSUS YEARS AND

2011/04 LEUKAEMIA IN WALES Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit

BIOL 51A - Biostatistics 1 1. Lecture 1: Intro to Biostatistics. Smoking: hazardous? FEV (l) Smoke

Critical Illness Cover

Estimating Causal Effects of Organ Transplantation Treatment Regimes

ADVANCED STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES. Cox s regression analysis Time dependent explanatory variables

JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT (JSNA) Key findings from the Leicestershire JSNA and Charnwood summary

REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR TIME-TO-EVENT DATA THE PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS (COX) MODEL ST520

Supplementary Material

Section IX. Introduction to Logistic Regression for binary outcomes. Poisson regression

LIST OF TABLES END STAGE RENAL DISEASE NETWORK 8, INC.

Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Patrick J. Heagerty PhD Department of Biostatistics University of Washington

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Introduction to Inferential Statistics. Jaranit Kaewkungwal, Ph.D. Faculty of Tropical Medicine Mahidol University

Multi-state Models: An Overview

Ph.D. course: Regression models. Introduction. 19 April 2012

Approach to identifying hot spots for NCDs in South Africa

Study No: Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Statistical Methods:

Definitions and examples Simple estimation and testing Regression models Goodness of fit for the Cox model. Recap of Part 1. Per Kragh Andersen

Ph.D. course: Regression models. Regression models. Explanatory variables. Example 1.1: Body mass index and vitamin D status

Alternative Approaches to Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: Uniportal, Supxiphoid,

Bayesian Nonparametric Accelerated Failure Time Models for Analyzing Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Year 8: Living World- Functioning Organisms

You know I m not goin diss you on the internet Cause my mama taught me better than that I m a survivor (What?) I m not goin give up (What?

CASE REPORT FORM (April 2012)

COOK ISLANDS TE MARAE ORA

Part III Measures of Classification Accuracy for the Prediction of Survival Times

Multi-state models: prediction

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 4, April ISSN

STAC51: Categorical data Analysis

Lynsi Rahorst, MT(ASCP) IRL Staff Technologist II. Everything But the Kitchen Sink!

A homo-dimer of annexin V protects against ischemia reperfusion injury in lung transplantation

DISCRETE PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS

Chronic Granulomatous Disease Medical Management

Chapter 4 Fall Notations: t 1 < t 2 < < t D, D unique death times. d j = # deaths at t j = n. Y j = # at risk /alive at t j = n

Log-linearity for Cox s regression model. Thesis for the Degree Master of Science

STAT 526 Spring Final Exam. Thursday May 5, 2011

Year 8: Living World- Functioning Organisms.

Auxiliary-variable-enriched Biomarker Stratified Design

Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology HST.952: Computing for Biomedical Scientists. Data and Knowledge Representation Lecture 2

Use of frequentist and Bayesian approaches for extrapolating from adult efficacy data to design and interpret confirmatory trials in children

Practical APLIS-based Structured/Synoptic Reporting

Survival Analysis. 732G34 Statistisk analys av komplexa data. Krzysztof Bartoszek

SEYCHELLES NATIONAL CANCER REGISTRY REPORT FOR

MAS3301 / MAS8311 Biostatistics Part II: Survival

Sample Size and Power I: Binary Outcomes. James Ware, PhD Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA

New Immigrant Survey Section D - Health

JOINT MODELING OF MULTIVARIATE LONGITUDINAL DATA AND COMPETING RISKS DATA JEEVANANTHAM RAJESWARAN

Data Analysis and Statistical Methods Statistics 651

GIS and Health Geography. What is epidemiology?

Time-dependent covariates

Online supplement. Absolute Value of Lung Function (FEV 1 or FVC) Explains the Sex Difference in. Breathlessness in the General Population

NCCTG Status Report for Study N May 2010

Lung Exchange. November 23, Abstract

Interplay Between S-adenosylmethionine, Folate, Cobalamin, and Arsenic Methylation in Bangladesh

Compare Predicted Counts between Groups of Zero Truncated Poisson Regression Model based on Recycled Predictions Method

Modular Program Report

Supplementary webappendix

4. Comparison of Two (K) Samples

Using rjags for survival data with right censoring

Probability and Probability Distributions. Dr. Mohammed Alahmed

Treatment Intake Form

PhD course: Statistical evaluation of diagnostic and predictive models

Chapter 7 Fall Chapter 7 Hypothesis testing Hypotheses of interest: (A) 1-sample

Phone number: When and how did your pain begin? (a date is required for Medicare and some insurance policies) Date of onset:

Textbook: Survivial Analysis Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data 2nd edition, by Klein and Moeschberger

Statistics in medicine

Low-Income African American Women's Perceptions of Primary Care Physician Weight Loss Counseling: A Positive Deviance Study

Enrollment of Students with Disabilities

Chapter Six: Two Independent Samples Methods 1/51

Survival Analysis with Time- Dependent Covariates: A Practical Example. October 28, 2016 SAS Health Users Group Maria Eberg

Bias in Markov Models of Disease

Apply Grey Relational Grade And Rough Set Theory for The Factor Weighting Analysis in Liver Function

Distributed analysis in multi-center studies

Jefferies Gene Editing/Therapy Summit Matthew Kapusta, Interim Chief Executive Officer OCTOBER 11, 2016

Practice problems from chapters 2 and 3

MRI of the airways and lungs Including hyperpolarized techniques

Welfare and Equity Consequences of Transplant Organ Allocation Policies

CARDIAC METASTASIS MASQUERADE AS STEMI D R S R E E K A N T H K O D U R

Mixture Models for Capture- Recapture Data

Constrained Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Model Calibration Using Summary-level Information from External Big Data Sources

The Design of a Survival Study

Robust estimates of state occupancy and transition probabilities for Non-Markov multi-state models

Transcription:

CHAPTER 3 HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Editors: Mr Mohamed Ezani Md. Taib Dato Dr David Chew Soon Ping Dr Ashari Yunus Expert Panel: Mr Mohamed Ezani Md. Taib (Chairperson) Dr Abdul Rais Sanusi Datuk Dr Aizai Azan Abdul Rahim Dr Ashari Yunus Dato Dr David Chew Soon Ping Contents 3.0 Introduction 3.1 Stock and Flow of Heart Transplantation 3.2 Recipients Characteristics Demographics and Clinical Status Primary Diagnosis 3.3 Transplant Practices Type of Transplant Immunosuppressive Therapy and Other Medications Duration of Waiting Time on the Waiting List 3.4 Transplant Outcomes Post Transplant Complications Patient Survival Causes of Death

HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION National Transplant Registry 2014 List of Tables Table 3.1.1a: Stock and Flow of Heart Transplantation, 1997-2014... 4 Table 3.2.1a: Distribution of Patients by Gender, 1997-2014... 5 Table 3.2.2a: Distribution of Patients by Ethnic Group, 1997-2014... 5 Table 3.2.3a: Distribution of Patients by Age, 1997-2014... 5 Table 3.2.4a: Distribution of Patients by Primary Diagnosis, 1997-2014... 5 Table 3.3.1a: Distribution of Patients by Heart Procedure, 1997-2014... 6 Table 3.3.2a: Distribution of Patients by Immunosuppressive Used, 1997-2014... 6 Table 3.3.3a: Immunosuppressive Used at Time of Last Follow-up up to 2014... 6 Table 3.4.1: Post Transplant Events at Last Follow-up up to 2014... 7 Table 3.4.2: Post Transplant Malignancies at Follow-up up to 2014... 8 Table 3.4.3: Non-compliance at Follow-up up to 2014... 8 Table 3.4.4: Patient Treated for Rejection at Follow-up up to 2014... 8 Table 3.4.5a: Distribution of Patients by Time of Deaths, 1997-2014... 8 Table 3.4.6: Patient Survival, 1997-2014... 10 Table 3.4.7: Cause of Death at Discharge, 1997-2014... 10 Table 3.4.8: Cause of Death at Follow-up, 1997-2014... 11 Table 3.1.1b: Stock and Flow of Lung Transplantation, 2005-2014... 12 Table 3.2.1b: Distribution of Patients by Gender, 2005-2014... 13 Table 3.2.2b: Distribution of Patients by Ethnic Group, 2005-2014... 13 Table 3.2.3b: Distribution of Patients by Age, 2005-2014... 13 Table 3.2.4b: Distribution of Patients by Primary Diagnosis, 2005-2014... 13 Table 3.3.1b: Distribution of Patients by Heart Procedure, 2005-2014... 14 Table 3.3.3b: Immunosuppressive Used at Time of Last Follow-up up to 2014... 14 Table 3.4.5b: Distribution of Patients by Time of Deaths, 2005-2014... 14 List of Figures Figure 3.1.1a: Stock and Flow of Heart Transplantation, 1997-2014... 14 Figure 3.4.6: Patient Survival, 1997-2014... 10 Figure 3.1.1b Stock and Flow of Lung Transplant and Heart Lung Transplant... 12 2

National Transplant Registry 2014 HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION 3.0 INTRODUCTION The first heart transplant in Malaysia was in 1997, and the first lung transplant was in 2005. Since then the numbers of thoracic transplants have remained few and far between. For end stage heart failure patients, the use of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to heart transplant has been employed, to keep patients alive when their condition deteriorated while on the heart transplant waiting list. In 2014, there was only one thoracic organ transplant (heart transplant) performed. After 16 years since heart transplantation started in Malaysia, this option for the treatment of patients with end stage heart failure remains limited in availability. The Kaplan Meier survival curve is 54% at 1 year and 44% at 5 years. Most patients succumb early post heart transplant. The rest of the report that follows review the results of heart and lung transplantation in Malaysia till end of 2014. 3

HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION National Transplant Registry 2014 HEART TRANSPLANTATION 3.1 STOCK AND FLOW Table 3.1.1a: Stock and Flow of Heart Transplantation, 1997-2014 97 98 99 2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 New transplant patients 1 3 2 3 4 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 Deaths 0 1 0 3 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 Retransplanted 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alive at 31 st December 1 3 5 5 8 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 8 8 11 10 10 10 Note: The same patient was re-transplanted in the year 2007, thus only counted as one Figure 3.1.1a: Stock and Flow of Heart Transplant, 1997-2014 4

National Transplant Registry 2014 HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION 3.2 RECIPIENTS CHARACTERISTICS Table 3.2.1a: Distribution of Patients by Gender, 1997-2014 97 98 99 2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL Gender n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n Male 1 3 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 17 Female 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 TOTAL 1 3 2 3 4 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 24 Note: The same patient was re-transplanted in the year 2007, thus only counted as one Table 3.2.2a: Distribution of Patients by Ethnic Group, 1997-2014 97 98 99 2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL Ethnic group n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n Malay 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 9 Chinese 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 Indian 1 3 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 TOTAL 1 3 2 3 4 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 24 Note: The same patient was re-transplanted in the year 2007, thus only counted as one Table 3.2.3a: Distribution of Patients by Age, 1997-2014 97 98 99 2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL Age, years n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 0-19 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 20-39 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 5 40-59 1 1 0 2 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 13 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 3 2 3 4 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 24 Mean 51 40 15 37 38-46 - 15 44 14-41 - 36-43 37 35 SD - 9 1 22 17-8 - - - - - - - 13 - - - 15 Median 51 37 15 44 43-46 - 15 44 14-41 - 33-43 37 40 Minimum 51 33 15 13 14-40 - 15 44 14-41 - 25-43 37 13 Maximum 51 50 16 55 54-52 - 15 44 14-41 - 50-43 37 54 Age=date of transplant-date of birth Note: The same patient was re-transplanted in the year 2007, thus only counted as one Age for 2007 patient was same for 1 st and 2 nd transplant Table 3.2.4a: Distribution of Patients by Primary Diagnosis, 1997-2014 97 98 99 2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL Primary diagnosis n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy 1 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 8 Restrictive Cardiomyopathy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 End Stage Valvular Heart Disease 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1* 4 TOTAL 1 3 2 3 4 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 24 *Non ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy Note: The same patient was re-transplanted in the year 2007, thus only counted as one 5

HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION National Transplant Registry 2014 3.3 TRANSPLANT PRACTICES Table 3.3.1a: Distribution of Patients by Heart Procedure, 1997-2014 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL Heart Procedure n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n Orthotopic Bicaval 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 5 Orthotopic Traditional 0 2 2 3 4 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 19 TOTAL 1 3 2 3 4 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 24 Table 3.3.2a: Distribution of Patients by Immunosuppressive Used, 1997-2014 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Total Type of immunosuppressive n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n Steroids Prednisolone 1 3 2 3 4 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 21 Methylprednisolone 1 3 2 3 4 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 24 Calcineurin Inhibitors Neoral 1 3 2 3 4 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 22 Tacrolimus (FK506) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Antimetabolites Azathioprine (AZA) 1 3 2 3 4 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 9 Anti-lymphocyte Receptor Antibodies Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Simulect 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 TOTAL patients at notification 1 3 2 3 4 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 24 Table 3.3.3a: Immunosuppressive Used at Time of Last Follow-up up to 2014 of follow up* 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Type of immunosuppressive n n n n n n n n n n n Steroids Prednisolone 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 2 1 1 1 Methylprednisolone 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 Everolimus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Calcineurin Inhibitors Neoral 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 6 10 9 9 FK506 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 Antimetabolites Azathioprine (AZA) 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) 3 3 5 5 6 6 6 6 9 8 8 Everolimus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 TOTAL patients at follow-up 6 6 7 7 8 8 8 8 10 10 10 *Data according to year of follow up of transplanted patients 6

National Transplant Registry 2014 HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Table 3.3.4a: Duration of Waiting Time on Waiting List, 1997-2014 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL Duration (months)* n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n <5 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 7 5 10 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 10 15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 15 20 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 40 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 45 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 1 2 2 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 20 Mean 6 2 4 15 5-20 - 9 10 13-13 - 21-41 13 12 SD - 0 1 6 5-25 - - - 0 - - - 34 - - - 16 Median 6 2 4 15 5-20 - 9 10 13-13 - 2-41 13 8 Minimum 6 2 3 10 1-2 - 9 10 13-13 - 1-41 13 1 Maximum 6 2 5 19 8-37 - 9 10 13-13 - 61-41 13 61 *Duration=date of transplant-date added to wait list 3.4 TRANPLANT OUTCOMES Table 3.4.1: Post Transplant Events at Last Follow-up up to 2014 of transplant* Type of post transplant events Drug Treated Hypertension Bone Disease (Symptomatic) 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 Chronic Liver Disease 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cataracts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diabetes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Renal Dysfunction 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 Stroke 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Drug-Treated Hyperlipidaemia 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 10 TOTAL patients at follow-up 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 10 *Data according to year of transplant of patient 7

HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION National Transplant Registry 2014 Table 3.4.2: Post Transplant Malignancies at Follow-up up to 2014 of transplant* 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL Type of post transplant n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n malignancies Donor related 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recurrence of pretransplant tumor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 De novo solid tumor 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 De novo lymphoproliferative 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Skin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total patients at follow up 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 10 *Data according to year of transplant of patient Table 3.4.3: Non-compliance at Follow-up up to 2014 of transplant* 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL Non-compliance during follow-up n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n Yes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 10 TOTAL patients at follow-up 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 10 *Data according to year of transplant of patient Table 3.4.4: Patient Treated for Rejection at Follow-up up to 2014 of transplant* 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL Patient treated for rejection n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n Yes 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 10 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL patients at follow-up 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 10 *Data according to year of transplant of patient Table 3.4.5a: Distribution of Patients by Time of Deaths, 1997-2014 of discharge 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL Time of deaths* n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n <3 months (at discharge) 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 3-<6 months 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 months-1 year 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 >1 year 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 TOTAL patients who died 0 1 0 3 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 14 *Time=Date of death date of transplant 8

National Transplant Registry 2014 HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Table 3.4.6: Patient Survival, 1997-2014 of Transplant 1997-2014 Interval % Survival SE 1 year 54 0.10 3 year 50 0.10 5 year 44 0.11 10 year 38 0.11 Figure 3.4.6: Patient Survival, 1997-2014 9

HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION National Transplant Registry 2014 Table 3.4.7: Cause of Death at Discharge, 1997-2014 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL Cause of death n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n Hyperacute rejection 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Multi organ failure 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Respiratory failure secondary to 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 septicaemia Respiratory failure, renal function and liver failure, ARDS, 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 septicaemia Septicaemia, multiorgan 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 failure Graft failure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Severe Pneumonia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 TOTAL patients who died at discharge 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 10

National Transplant Registry 2014 HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Table 3.4.8: Cause of Death at Follow-up, 1997-2014 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL Cause of death n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n Severe bleeding 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lung cancer, small cell type bronchopneumonia 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Rejection due to non compliance 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Sudden death due most likely to graft CAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL patients who died at follow up 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 6 11

HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION National Transplant Registry 2014 LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Table 3.1.1b: Stock and Flow of Lung Transplantation, 2005-2014 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 New Heart and Lung Transplant Patients 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 New Lung Transplant Patients 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 Deaths 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 Alive at 31 st December 1 1 2 2 2 1 4 3 3 2 Figure 3.1.1b Stock and Flow of Lung Transplant and Heart Lung Transplant 12

National Transplant Registry 2014 HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION 3.2 RECIPIENTS CHARACTERISTICS Table 3.2.1b: Distribution of Patients by Gender, 2005-2014 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL Gender n n n n n n n n n n n Male 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 Female 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 TOTAL 1 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 9 Table 3.2.2b: Distribution of Patients by Ethnic Group, 2005-2014 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL Ethnic group n n n n n n n n n n n Malay 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 Chinese 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Indian 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 Bumiputra Sarawak 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 1 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 9 Table 3.2.3b: Distribution of Patients by Age, 2005-2014 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL Age, n n n n n n n n n n n years 0-19 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20-39 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 40-59 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 4 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 9 Age=date of transplant-date of birth Table 3.2.4b: Distribution of Patients by Primary Diagnosis, 2005-2014 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL Primary diagnosis n n n n n n n n n n n Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 5 Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bronchiectasis 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 1* 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 1 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 9 * ventricular septal defect (VSD) and Eisenmenger s syndrome 13

HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION National Transplant Registry 2014 3.3 TRANSPLANT PRACTICES Table 3.3.1b: Distribution of Patients by Thoracic Transplant Procedure, 2005-2014 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL Heart Procedure n n n n n n n n n n n Single lung transplant 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Double lung transplant 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 Heart-Lung tranplant 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 TOTAL 1 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 9 Table 3.3.3b: Immunosuppressive Used at Time of Last Follow-up up to 2014 of follow up* 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Type of immunosuppressive n n n n n n n n n n Steroids: Prednisolone 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Methylprednisolone 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Calcineurin Inhibitors: Neoral 1 2 3 0 0 1 1 3 3 2 FK506 (Tacrolimus) 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 Antimetabolites: Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) 1 2 3 2 0 0 1 3 3 2 TOTAL patients at followup 1 2 3 2 2 1 1 3 3 2 *Data according to year of follow up of transplanted patients 3.4 TRANSPLANT OUTCOMES Table 3.4.5b: Distribution of Patients by Time of Deaths, 2005-2014 of discharge 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL Time of deaths* n n n n n n n n n n n <3 months (at discharge) 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 3-<6 months 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 months-1 year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 >1 year 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 TOTAL patients who died 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 7 *Time=Date of death date of transplant 14