Fission. Department of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering (DEI) - University of Bologna

Similar documents
Introduction to Fusion Physics

INTRODUCTION TO MAGNETIC NUCLEAR FUSION

Magnetic Confinement Fusion and Tokamaks Chijin Xiao Department of Physics and Engineering Physics University of Saskatchewan

Chapter IX: Nuclear fusion

Simple examples of MHD equilibria

Der Stellarator Ein alternatives Einschlusskonzept für ein Fusionskraftwerk

The Path to Fusion Energy creating a star on earth. S. Prager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

Magnetic Confinement Fusion-Status and Challenges

Introduction to Nuclear Fusion. Prof. Dr. Yong-Su Na

Joint ITER-IAEA-ICTP Advanced Workshop on Fusion and Plasma Physics October Introduction to Fusion Leading to ITER

Recent Development of LHD Experiment. O.Motojima for the LHD team National Institute for Fusion Science

The Dynomak Reactor System

Toward the Realization of Fusion Energy

Jacob s Ladder Controlling Lightning

Physics of fusion power. Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER

Spherical Torus Fusion Contributions and Game-Changing Issues

The Levitated Dipole Experiment: Towards Fusion Without Tritium

Tokamak Fusion Basics and the MHD Equations

Chapter 12. Magnetic Fusion Toroidal Machines: Principles, results, perspective

Fast Ion Confinement in the MST Reversed Field Pinch

and expectations for the future

Physics & Engineering Physics University of Saskatchewan. Supported by NSERC, CRC

Turbulence and Transport The Secrets of Magnetic Confinement

A Technology Review of Electricity Generation from Nuclear Fusion Reaction in Future

DT Fusion Ignition of LHD-Type Helical Reactor by Joule Heating Associated with Magnetic Axis Shift )

D- 3 He HA tokamak device for experiments and power generations

A Faster Way to Fusion

TWO FUSION TYPES NEUTRONIC ANEUTRONIC

EF2200 Plasma Physics: Fusion plasma physics

MHD. Jeff Freidberg MIT

Fusion Principles Jef ONGENA Plasma Physics Laboratory Royal Military Academy Brussels

Plasma & Fusion on Earth: merging age-old natural phenomena into your present and future

Overview of Pilot Plant Studies

Chapter 1 Nature of Plasma

0 Magnetically Confined Plasma

Helium Catalyzed D-D Fusion in a Levitated Dipole

JET JET JET EFDA THE JOINT EUROPEAN TORUS A EUROPEAN SUCCESS STORY

Advanced Tokamak Research in JT-60U and JT-60SA

JET and Fusion Energy for the Next Millennia

Fusion Energy: Pipe Dream or Panacea

ª 10 KeV. In 2XIIB and the tandem mirrors built to date, in which the plug radius R p. ª r Li

Stellarators. Dr Ben Dudson. 6 th February Department of Physics, University of York Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK

Technological and Engineering Challenges of Fusion

Unpressurized steam reactor. Controlled Fission Reactors. The Moderator. Global energy production 2000

Confinement of toroidal non-neutral plasma

Efficient Energy Conversion of the 14MeV Neutrons in DT Inertial Confinement Fusion. By F. Winterberg University of Nevada, Reno

Neutral beam plasma heating

Atomic physics in fusion development

The GDT-based fusion neutron source as a driver of subcritical nuclear fuel systems

Progressing Performance Tokamak Core Physics. Marco Wischmeier Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik Garching marco.wischmeier at ipp.mpg.

Plasma Wall Interactions in Tokamak

A Passion for Plasma Physics and Nuclear Fusion Research. K. A. Connor Plasma Dynamics Laboratory ECSE Department RPI

Design window analysis of LHD-type Heliotron DEMO reactors

General Physics (PHY 2140)

Toroidal confinement devices

Fast ion generation with novel three-ion radiofrequency heating scenarios:

STELLARATOR REACTOR OPTIMIZATION AND ASSESSMENT

Compact, spheromak-based pilot plants for the demonstration of net-gain fusion power

HIGH PERFORMANCE EXPERIMENTS IN JT-60U REVERSED SHEAR DISCHARGES

The RFP: Plasma Confinement with a Reversed Twist

Direct drive by cyclotron heating can explain spontaneous rotation in tokamaks

Nuclear Fusion and ITER

THE SHEARED-FLOW STABILIZED Z-PINCH

Possibilities for Long Pulse Ignited Tokamak Experiments Using Resistive Magnets

The Spherical Tokamak as a Compact Fusion Reactor Concept

Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion

Energetic Particle Physics in Tokamak Burning Plasmas

Resistive Wall Mode Control in DIII-D

OVERVIEW OF THE ALCATOR C-MOD PROGRAM. IAEA-FEC November, 2004 Alcator Team Presented by Martin Greenwald MIT Plasma Science & Fusion Center

Imposed Dynamo Current Drive

Study on supporting structures of magnets and blankets for a heliotron-type type fusion reactors

THE HENRYK NIEWODNICZAŃSKI INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES PLASMA-FOCUS AND CONTROLLED NUCLEAR FUSION.

Observation of Neo-Classical Ion Pinch in the Electric Tokamak*

Burn Stabilization of a Tokamak Power Plant with On-Line Estimations of Energy and Particle Confinement Times

Formation and Long Term Evolution of an Externally Driven Magnetic Island in Rotating Plasmas )

PFC/JA NEUTRAL BEAM PENETRATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR CIT

DT Fusion Power Production in ELM-free H-modes in JET

Current density modelling in JET and JT-60U identity plasma experiments. Paula Sirén

Developing a Robust Compact Tokamak Reactor by Exploiting New Superconducting Technologies and the Synergistic Effects of High Field D.

FAST 1 : a Physics and Technology Experiment on the Fusion Road Map

Fusion Development Facility (FDF) Mission and Concept

for the French fusion programme

STEADY-STATE EXHAUST OF HELIUM ASH IN THE W-SHAPED DIVERTOR OF JT-60U

Beams and magnetized plasmas

MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS

Nuclear Energy in the Future. The ITER Project. Brad Nelson. Chief Engineer, US ITER. Presentation for NE-50 Symposium on the Future of Nuclear Energy

New technologies of electric energy converters and actuators

PLASMA: WHAT IT IS, HOW TO MAKE IT AND HOW TO HOLD IT. Felix I. Parra Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford

Integrated Modelling and Simulation of Toroidal Plasmas

EU PPCS Models C & D Conceptual Design

Concept of Multi-function Fusion Reactor

Denis Bytschkow. Investigation of MHD mode rotation in the tokamak ASDEX Upgrade

Plasma and Fusion Research: Regular Articles Volume 10, (2015)

Aspects of Advanced Fuel FRC Fusion Reactors

arxiv: v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 24 Nov 2017

First Observation of ELM Suppression by Magnetic Perturbations in ASDEX Upgrade and Comparison to DIII-D Matched-Shape Plasmas

Role of Magnetic Configuration and Heating Power in ITB Formation in JET.

Toroidal confinement of non-neutral plasma. Martin Droba

DEMO Concept Development and Assessment of Relevant Technologies. Physics and Engineering Studies of the Advanced Divertor for a Fusion Reactor

Nuclear Fusion 1 of 24 Boardworks Ltd 2011

Transcription:

CONTROLLED THERMONUCLEAR FUSION Nuclear energy E = m c Fusion Fission 1 Main CTF Reactions DD, DT, DHe 3 Reactions D + D D + T D + He 3 T (1 MeV) + p (3 MeV) - 5 % He 3 (.8 MeV) + n (.45 MeV) - 5 % He 4 (3.5 MeV) + n (14.1 MeV) He 4 (3.7 MeV) + p (14.7 MeV) - D (deuterium) hydrogen stable isotope,.15 % content in water. - T (tritium) hydrogen instable isotope, coming from: Li 6 + n He 4 ( MeV) + T(.7 MeV) Li 7 + n He 4 + T + n -.5 MeV - Li (lithium) natural element with isotopes: Li 6-7.4 % and Li 7-9.6 % in nature. 1

Magnetic Confinement of Fusion Plasmas: The charged particles, the ions and the electrons, are confined by the magnetic fields, the neutrons escape from the plasma volume. I(B z ) I(B tr ) CTF Reactions Secondary reactions present with the primary DT reaction: T + T He 3 + He 3 He 4 + n + 11.3 MeV He 4 + p + 1.9 MeV T + He 3 He 4 + n + p + 1.1 MeV [51 %] He 4 + D + 14.3 MeV [43 %] He 5 + p + 14.3 MeV [6 %] He 4 + n 4

CTF Reactions without neutrons The energy released by the fusion reaction given to neutrons escapes from the plasma as they are not contained by the magnetic field. The following fusion reactions do not have neutrons as products: p+ B 11 3He 4 (8.66 MeV) p+ Li 6 He 3 (.3 MeV) + He 4 (1.7 MeV) In this case the energy released by the fusion reaction is given to charged particles only and remains inside the plasma as they are contained by the magnetic field. 5 CTF Reaction cross sections 6 3

Coulomb barrier When the nuclei of to atoms, that are both positively charged, approach, the repulsive Coulomb force acts. At R this force is replaced by the attractive nuclear force replace the Coulomb force. Then fusion of the two nuclei in a new nucleus. The energy due to the Coulomb force to reach the distance r between the nuclei is Z1Ze W = 4 r Thus in order to reach the distance R to have fusion the energy to be supplied to the nuclei is: W Z1Ze = 4 R ZZe 1 4e R R r 7 f v = CTF Reaction integrals R f nn 1 + = f ( v ) f ( v ) v - v ( v - v ) d v d v 1 1 1 f 1-1 3 m s 8 4

Energy balance in CTF Energy gain due to the fusion reactions: P f = n 1 n < f v> Q P f, = n 1 n < f v> Q where Q and Q are the total energy and the energy of the particles (He 4 ) respectively released by a fusion DT: Q = 3.5 MeV and Q = 17.6 MeV) 9 Energy balance in CTF Radiation losses: When hydrogen isotopes are present, there are not line radiation but only bremstralung radiation: -4 P = 1.43 1 Z n n T W / m b If there are impurities with high atomic numbers, You have high loss rates due to line radiation can be present. Confinement losses: Plasma energy per unit volume is given by 3 E = k n T + n T c e e i i At the end of the confinement after "energy confinement time of τ c seconds this energy is release, therefore it is lost the loss. The energy lost per unit of time is i c τ c is a confinement cycle depending on the c fusion system (reactor). c 1 P = E e 3 5

Energy balance in CTF Conditions to be reached for CTF : - Ignition: P f, P b + P C - Breakeven: P f P b + P C CTF obtained through DD reactions assuming that: n = n e = n i, T = T e = T i. To have ignitions it is necessary that: 3knT ¼ n v Q + 1.43 1-4 f n T n c ¼ v f c Q 3knT -1.43 1-4 T 11 Energy balance in CTF Schematic of a power plant with a CTF reactor 1 6

Energy balance in CTF Lawson criterion Lawson criterion is an important general measure of a system that defines the conditions needed for a fusion reactor to reach ignition, that is, that the heating of the plasma by the products of the fusion reactions is sufficient to maintain the temperature of the plasma against all losses without external power input. The criterion gives a minimum required value for the electron density n e and the "energy confinement time c. - Released power after a cycle od a time c : P out P f + P b + P C - Power to be supplied to reach CTF conditions: P in P b + P C If is the CTF conversion efficiency, for the self-maintenance of the process it must be: P out P in CTF obtained through DD reactions with n = n e = n i, T = T e = T i, it is n c ¼ v f Q 3knT -1.43 1 1 - -4 T 13 Energy balance in CTF Criterions for breakeven and ignition (also Lawson criterion ) 14 7

Magnetic confinement The magnetic confinement in CTF is realized by means of magnetic containment of the fusion plasma (T 1 kev) that exploit the property of charged particles that have to move on the walls of magnetic flux tubes. 15 Magnetic confinement Pinch effect + A discharge in a gas induces an azimuth induction field that is composed of the current and produces a centripetal force acting on the charged plasma particles. This phenomenon takes the name of pinch effect. J J B 16 8

Magnetic surfaces The Dall'equazione equation of di the conservazione momentum conservation della quantità equation di moto e and dall'equazione the nd Maxwell di Ampere: law are: p + t u uu JB B J L'equazione At equilibrium di conservazione the equation of della the momentum quantità di conservation moto all'equilibrio equation diviene: becomes: p = JB moltiplicando By means of of scalarmente the multiplication tale equazioneof per this Jequation e per B: by J and B alternatively, it is: J p = B p = J and B lie on isobaric surfaces. 17 Magnetic surfaces in linear configurations For Per linear le scariche configuration nelle configurazioni of the discharge lineari (z-pinch) pinch) the momentum dalla continuità conservation della quantità equation di ismoto: dp dr =-J B dp=-j B dr z z From Dall'equazione the nd Maxwell di Ampere: law it is: l Bdl= I z rb = r J z B = 1 rj z 3 r dp = -½ J r dr z Z-Pinch + Detto For the R external il raggio radius esterno of the della discharge scarica, R p it = is p per = : r = R: R R R dpr = r dp=- rpdr R p R p R R r dp = R p I 8 3 J zr dr J zr 8 z 4 Assuming J z constant. I z B 18 9

Linear configurations Bennet relation From the B = rj z / it is B = I z /R (J z. constant for r R) it follows: B R p I z p 8 If Si N definisce = R n con is the N number = R n of il numero particles di per particelle unit of per length unità di of lunghezza the discharge, della as scarica. p = nk(t Poiché p = nk(t i +T e ) i +T e ), for the z- pinches si ottiene (linear la relazione discharges) Bennet the Bennet per le configurazioni relation follows lineari (z-pinch): as: + Nk T + T i e 8 I z I z For Per un a LTE plasma plasma in ETL where con gas temperatura temerature de and gas electron temperature uguale alla temperatura are equal, the degli Bennet elettroni relation relazione is: di Bennet diviene: Nk T I z 16 B 19 Linear configurations Bennet relation The beta parameter is defined (not to be confused with the Hall parameter) as the ratio between the thermodynamic pressure and the magnetic pressure: p = B / p B = p B / 8 R I z Nk T + T i e I 8 Bennet Relation z + I z B 1

Linear configurations Bennet relation A z-pinch discharge shift causes an increase in B within the discharge column and a decrease in B on the outside. There is therefore a more intense Lorentz force inside than outside causing instability with amplification of the deviation from linear geometry. To stabilize the z-pinch a magnetic induction field B parallel to the axis whose force lines remain within the discharge as B is parallel to J. B forces the charged particles to move along their own flux lines and the discharge does not deviate from the linear geometry. For the z-pinch stabilized Bennet relationship it is: Nk T + T i e 8 I z J + B B J 1 Toroidal configurations To eliminate particle losses in the electrode regions, in parallel to the discharge axis, and energy losses due to the contact with the electrodes, toroidal configurations are used. 11

Toroidal configurations In the inner side of the toroidal configuration, B and the Lorentz's strength are more intense than in the external side. Thus the plasma torus tends to expand. In order to avoid this, a magnetic field parallel to the major axis of the torus, a vertical field B z is added. The component of the poloidal field produced by the plasma current B θ outside the torus is increased and inside of it is is decreased. Thus, a balance effect prevents the torus expansion. In addition a toroidal field, B, is added to have a stable configuration (as in the stabilized z-pinch). B Confining poloidal B B z : Balancing axial B B Stabilizing toroidal B 3 Toroidal configurations Derivation of B z : The forces acting on the radial direction: - F p : due to the thermodynamic pressure; -F m : due to the magnetic pressure depending on W m =½LI (magnetic energy where I is the plasma current); -F z : due to the vertical field B z. From the principle of virtual work : dl p = p dv = p R = a p dr + dr - R a = dl p Fp = = a p = Nk Te T = I f dr 4 Toroidal coordinates: r, 8R Cilindrical coordinates: R, z, d R ln dw a m dl F m = = ½I = ½I = dr dr dr L coefficientediautoinduzi onedelplasma. Per torosottile(r a) 8R = ½I ln 1 8R For thin etorus distribuzi (R a) onedicorrenteuniforme: and J L Rln a a z R R a r 1

Toroidal configurations F p and F m are oriented toward the increasing R-direction (R majour torus radius) therefore act to expand the torus, F z is directed toward the decreasing R- direction : F = R I B z z Hence F z is balancing F p +F m : F+F =F p m z B = I z R ln 8R 1 4 a 5 Toroidal configurations Security factor q The Il passo pitch della of the linea of di the forza spiral del magnetic campo flux magnetico lines is: è: B B pr = r B B The Il fattore security di sicurezza, factor q, funzione function di of r, r, è: is: qr = pr R = r R B B B p Ergodic behaviour of the field linens: q is an irrational number, the field lines lay on the isobaric surfaces and completely cover them. Non-ergodic behaviour of the field linens: q is rational, the field lines after a certain number of turns close on themselves. 6 13

Toroidal configurations B B p p B B Tokamak - Stellarator In tokamaks the plasma is created by the discharge current (plasma current) I and B is induced by I The stability is reached by B In stellarators I and B is induced by external currents. Reversed Field Pinch In RFP the plasma is created by the plasma current I and B is induced by I The stability is reached by B which go to zero and then reverses. 7 Toroidal configurations In a stellarator the plasma current is zero and all fields are produced by external currents. For the solenoidality of B, it is B 1/R. If only B is present, a drift velocity would induce a charge separation and, as consequence, an electric field E. Thus, a drift velocity due to E of the same direction for negative and positive particles is determined. This would produce a torus expansion. A B θ field is required to rotate the positive particles from the bottom up and the negative particles from top to bottom by limiting the effect E. Torus only with B R Torus with B eb v E + E v C v C B B 8 14

Instability in fusion plasmas MHD instability (macroscopic instability): it concerns the location of plasma equilibrium and cause disruption of the discharge following displacements from the equilibrium position. Microscopic instability: they affect transport quantities and cause both particle and energy losses. 9 Instability in fusion plasmas Equilibrium analysis Energy principle: By means of continuity equations and Maxwell's equations, can express the potential energy of the system U (ξ) as a function of the displacement ξ. The equilibrium position is at ξ =. - Stable equilibrium: U (ξ) > U() - Unstable equilibrium: U (ξ) < U() Modal Analysis: Through the MHD model the configuration behaviour for a displacement of ξ with respect to the equilibrium position with ξ =, is studied: = (r) expi[(m n ) ] Depending on the boundary conditions, the instability of poloidal mode are with m =, 1,,... (also called flute or sausage instability, kink or braid instability, second order instability, etc., and the instability of toroidal modes with n =,1,,3... 3 15

Instability in fusion plasmas m = m = 1 m = Poloidal instabilities a. Flute instability (m = ); b. Kink instability (m = 1); c. Second order instability (m = ). Toroidal instabilities 31 Instability in fusion plasmas Instability control in Tokamaks: In order to suppress the instability of the poloidal mode from the mode to the mode m, it needs that: qa = a B m R B From the expression of q(a) and as from the 1 st Maxwell s law (Biot-Savart law) I = ab /, it follows: I < m a B R 3 16

CTF Additional plasma heating P J = EJ = J /: As T 3/, increase with increasing. This is a limit for the Joule heating. Moreover I and J are limited as q(a) > m. In order to control the poloidal mode m of the instability it must be: I a B /(m R ). To increase the temperature additional heating is necessary. This can be done by means of: Adiabatic heating (T/n = const.) Neutral injection Radiofrequency heating (F = 1 MHz 1 GHz) 33 CTF Additional plasma heating Adiabatic heating: T/n = const. 34 17

CTF Additional plasma heating Radiofrequency heating e = eb m e i = eb m i L = pi 1+ pe pi (f 1 GHz) (f 1 MHz) (f 1 GHz) U = pe + e (f 1 GHz) 35 CTF Additional plasma heating Neutral injection A f + A + A f+ + A (Charge exchange) A f + e A f+ + e (Electronic impact ionization) A f + A + A f+ + A + + e (ionic ionization) I(x) = I exp[-x/ ] =1/(Q ionizz n) a/4 (a torus small radius) 36 18

Toroidal machines Tokamak Machines - Transformer effect Air magnetic core Iron magnetic core Tokamak Machines The tokamak machine m requires to have a compact configuration (a R, B θ B Φ affichè I Φ ) qa = a R B B m 19

Tokamak Machines Main windings Tokamak Machines I(B tr ) I(B z )

Tokamak Machines Behaviour of the main currents during a pulse Toroidal field current Primary transformer current Plasma current Tokamak Machines Pl.Maj. rad..935 m Pl. Min. Rad..31 m Pl. Current 1.6 MA Tor. Field 8 T Tor. Field En. 16 MJ Pol. Field En. MJ Pulse Rep. Rate: 1 pulse every min. 1

Main Tokamak Machines T15 JT6 TFTR JET Russia Japan USA UE R [m].43 3..55.96 a [m].7.95.9 1.5 (.1) B [T] 5.5 4.5 5. 3.45 I P [MA].3.7 3. 5.1 JET - Joint European Torus (Culham - GB) Dimensions: R =.96 m, a = 1.5 (.1) m, B = 3.45 T, I φ = 5.1 MA

JET - Joint European Torus (Culham - GB) Electrical power Fusion power [W] Year Remote handling Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor - TFTR Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Design Achieved R.1-3.1 m.1-3.1 m Pl.Maj. Rad. a.4-.85 m.4 -.96 m Pl. Min. Rad. B ϕ 5. T 6. T Tor. Field I ϕ 3. MA 3. MA Pl.Current P NBI 33 MW 39.5 MW N. Beam Pow. P ICRF 1.5 MW 11.4 MW ICRF Power 3

Performance Q= P f P IN Q = P f, P IN (where: P IN = P C +P b ) Reversed Field Pinch 4

Reversed Field Pinch RFX Padova Stellarator Continuous regime machine 5

Stellarator Wendelstein Wendelstein 7-X 7-X Max Plank Inst. für Plasmaphysik, Greifswald, Germany Max Plank Inst. für Plasmaphysik, Greifswald, Germany Major radius: 5.5 m Minor radius:.53 m Plasma volume 3 m 3 Non planar coils: 5 Planar coils: Number of ports: 99 Rot. transform: 5/6 5/4 Induction on axis: max. 3T Stored energy: 6 MJ Heating power 15 3 MW Pulse length: 3 min Machine height: 4.5 m Maximal diameter: 16 m Machine mass: 75 t Cold mass: 39 t W7 X symmetry: 5 identical modules Module symmetry: flip symmetrical half 51 Wendelstein 7-X Max Plank Inst. für Plasmaphysik, Greifswald, Germany 5 6

Wendelstein 7-X Vacuum chamber Magnetic System Plasma 53 ITER International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor Cadarache (Proveza), France Central transformer coils Nb 3 Sn, 6 moduls Toroidal coils Nb 3 Sn, 18 moduls 5,3 T on the plasma axis Poloidal coils Nb-Ti, 6 modules ITER will start in 19. Nel 7 will produce electrical power of 5 MW for about 15 minutes. Criostat 4 m haigth x 8 m diam. Plasma characteristics Majour radius: 6. m Minor average radius: m Volume: 84 m 3 Current: 15 MA Density: 1 m -3 Temperature: 15- kev Fusion power: 5-7 MW Pulse time > 3 s Port Plug Criogenich pumps 8 54 7

ITER Vacuum Chamber and remote handling system 55 ITER Additional heating q Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica 56 8

ITER Magnetic system 57 ITER Estimated cost The estimated cost for construction is 4 6 M (5 value). About 5, M have been estimated for years of operation. Partners' contribution to construction is: o EU: 5% o JA RF CN KO US IN: 1% ciascuno 1% of the total cost is held as a reserve. 58 9

EU Strategy DEMO : To demonstrate electric energy production on a scale of FPP DEMO ITER: Scientic and technological feasibility Fusion Power Plant (FPP): Safe and acceptable for environmental impact and cost 59 Fusion Power Plant (FPP) Breeding Blanket Poloidal Field Coil Toroidal Field Coil Power Conversion System Heating & Current drive D+T+ashes Pumping Supply Electric Power to the Grid Isotope Separation 6 3

Fusion Power Plant (FPP) Safe and environmental impact Radiotoxicity (relative units) Nuclear fission Fusion Ashes of a coal plant Time after the arrest 61 31