One way to deal with the unpredictable costs of winter weather. By Shane Belvin

Similar documents
Weather Risk Management

Speedwell Weather. Topics: Setting up a weather desk (a shopping list)

Weather Risk Management. Salah DHOUIB Underwriter Paris Re

Weather Derivatives-Pricing and Design Issue in India

Weather Derivatives. AgBiz Insurance Workshop 08 October Raphael N. Karuaihe, PhD

WEATHER DERIVATIVES - A NEW CONCEPT IN THE WEATHER INSURANCES NARCIS EDUARD MITU

PRICING AND PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC VARIABLES

Allianz Risk Transfer. Weather Solutions

DRIVING ROI. The Business Case for Advanced Weather Solutions for the Energy Market

WEATHER DERIVATIVES AS A VEHICLE TO REALISE THE SKILL OF SEASONAL FORECASTS

Name of Bank BASEL III LEVERAGE RATIO REPORT As of 30 Sep 2018

Into Avista s Electricity Forecasts. Presented by Randy Barcus Avista Chief Economist Itron s Energy Forecaster s Group Meeting

World Meteorological Organization

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU F CLASS FILING INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN MODEL

Colorado State University (CSU) Atlantic Hurricane Season Forecast

MACRO-PRUDENTIAL RULES AND REGULATION (2015): DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS ANNEXURE I: FORMAT FOR ANNUAL DISCLOSURES DRUK PNB BANK LTD.

Thank you for your interest in the Support Resistance Strength Analyzer!

Winter Weather. National Weather Service Buffalo, NY

Here s what a weak El Nino usually brings to the nation with temperatures:

Lakeland Court MHP Norton Rd Lakeland, FL 33809

Indiana Academic Standards Science Grade: 3 - Adopted: 2016

Weather Company Energy and Power Products

Sunshine City 47-Sp MHP

Hosts: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada June 16-18,

Sample Institution Memphis, TN

DELAWARE COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU, INC. Internal Rate Of Return Model

A STOCHASTIC DAILY MEAN TEMPERATURE MODEL FOR WEATHER DERIVATIVES

CustomWeather Statistical Forecasting (MOS)

Quantifying Weather Risk Analysis

WeatherManager Weekly

Chapter 5. Transmission networks and electricity markets

FINAL REPORT EVALUATION REVIEW OF TVA'S LOAD FORECAST RISK

Sample Snow Services Proposal Alle Rorie 7157 E Kemper Rd Cincinnati, OH Phone: (800)

Home Owners. Age Male/Female. Snow removal for his/her driveway or private property

GLOUCESTER COAL LTD 2006 Annual Results Media Presentation 25 August 2006

Whitepaper. All Currency, One Wallet!

NOAA s Regional Climate Science & Information: Opportunities and Challenges

T E S L A T O A C Q U I R E S O L A R C I T Y

This introduction is intended for compliance officers at Protection Seller and Broker-Advisor firms

Social Studies 3 Vocabulary Cards. century. History 1. period of 100 years

Opportunities and Priorities in a New Era for Weather and Climate Services

Financial markets for weather

acuitas, inc. s survey of fair value audit deficiencies April 2012 audit deficiency trends pcaob inspections methodology description of a deficiency

Fossil Fuels Conference. 10 November The Limpopo Province A Hub for Sustainable Development

Disclosures - IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. for the period 1st April, st December, 2018 S.No. Form No Description

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Federated Strategic Value Dividend Fund (FSVF) vs. Dow Jones Select Dividend Index (Benchmark) 6/30/2017-9/29/2017 Sector Summary

Community and Infrastructure Services Committee

Winter. Here s what a weak La Nina usually brings to the nation with tempseraures:

Chapter 6 Continuous Probability Distributions

Project Name: Income Generation Project 4 Pouk District, Siem Reap Province Implementing Partner: Farmer Livelihood Development (FLD)

Great Lakes Update. Volume 191: 2014 January through June Summary. Vol. 191 Great Lakes Update August 2014

The impact of the open geographical data follow up study Agency for Data Supply and Efficiency

Christopher ISU

Financial Management of Weather Risk with Energy Derivatives

LEGAL DISCLAIMER. APG Coin (APG) White Paper (hereinafter 'the White Paper', 'the Document') is presented for informational purposes only

Adopted Budget Presented for Board Approval June 15, 2016

Winter Maintenance Report

Session 4: Money. Jean Imbs. November 2010

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Colorado State University (CSU) Atlantic Hurricane Season Forecast

Draft Model Memorandum of Understanding to promote voluntary cooperation between Government and Chemical Industry to enhance Precursors Chemicals

Federated Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKSCF) vs. Russell 2000 Growth Index (Benchmark) 12/29/2017-3/30/2018 Sector Summary

Kenneth Shelton, Assistant Superintendent, Business Services Los Angeles County Office of Education 9300 Imperial Highway Downey, CA 90242

WEATHER NORMALIZATION METHODS AND ISSUES. Stuart McMenamin Mark Quan David Simons

Seasonal Hazard Outlook

At the Midpoint of the 2008

PUBLIC UTILITY COMIVIISSION OF OREGON STAFF REPORT PUBLIC MEETING DATE: March 8, 2016

Drexel Woods Homeowner s Association, Inc Baltimore National Pike, Box 158 Catonsville, MD 21228

Economics th April 2011

Sometimes Accountants Fail to Budget

2012 AND ESTIMATE FOR Q1, 2013 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT FOR NIGERIA

Allianz Thailand Equity

Impact on Agriculture

REVISED UPDATED PREPARED DIRECT SAFETY ENHANCEMENT COST ALLOCATION TESTIMONY OF GARY LENART SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND

Internal Audit Report

Enhancing Weather Information with Probability Forecasts. An Information Statement of the American Meteorological Society

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions

Rebate Report. $15,990,000 Public Finance Authority Charter School Revenue Bonds (Voyager Foundation, Inc. Project) Series 2012A

HEALTHCARE. 5 Components of Accurate Rolling Forecasts in Healthcare

LOADS, CUSTOMERS AND REVENUE

Weather Company Energy and Power Products

Climate Change Impact on Air Temperature, Daily Temperature Range, Growing Degree Days, and Spring and Fall Frost Dates In Nebraska

Plows Truck Drivers. tations. Winter Maintenance Report. 30,546 Lane Miles 87% 174,000 40,000. Total Cost of Winter $ Million

Put the Weather to Work for Your Company

Adopted Budget Presented for Board Approval June 21, 2017

Minimizing Commercial Influence on Education Policy

WeatherManager Weekly

Snow Cover. Snow Plowing and Removal Services Best Practices Guide. l

MeteoGroup RoadMaster. The world s leading winter road weather solution

1 Bewley Economies with Aggregate Uncertainty

Use of Normals in Load Forecasting at National Grid

The financial reports included in your board packet represent IHLS Financial Activities through July 31, 2018.

RISK-RETURNS OF COTTON AND SOYBEAN ENTERPRISES FOR MISSISSIPPI COUNTY, ARK

2017 Settlement Calendar for ASX Cash Market Products ASX SETTLEMENT

2019 Settlement Calendar for ASX Cash Market Products. ASX Settlement

J2.4 SKILLFUL SEASONAL DEGREE-DAY FORECASTS AND THEIR UTILITY IN THE WEATHER DERIVATIVES MARKET

The Economics of E-commerce and Technology

Background and Assumptions

SuperPack North America

Transcription:

One way to deal with the unpredictable costs of winter weather. By Shane Belvin 32 INTERNATIONAL PARKING INSTITUTE SEPTEMBER 2016

Believe it or not, snow and ice are right around the corner. The volatility of the past several winters, from mild temperatures to record snowfall, has complicated the already difficult task of budgeting during the winter months. This can directly affect the bottom line of both leased and owned parking facilities by keeping lots empty and increasing snow removal costs. For managed properties, it can stress margins and damage client relationships. The uncertainty of weather ensures that the only thing definite about snow-related costs is that they will be unpredictable. You can analyze forecasts (what does El Niño mean?), read the Farmers, Almanac, use last year s expenditures as a placeholder, or just throw a dart at a board. A fixed, seasonal rate may help, but you still have risk in both high and low snow years. During seasons with below-average snowfall, you are paying for a service that isn t being provided. In high-snow seasons, some vendors might skimp on service to manage their own margins. These costs are independent of the weather s effect on customer behavior, which negatively affects revenue. Tools exist that can mitigate this seasonal risk. Coupled with using vendor management and RFP best practices, these financial instruments can effectively cap a variable expense. This allows both tenants and parking service providers to better manage their costs, revenue, and capital structure. These financial tools utilize weather options or derivatives. Hedging your snow removal costs will allow you to cap your snow removal expenses without sacrificing service. OPINION ISTOCK / PAVELRODIMOV parking.org/tpp SEPTEMBER 2016 INTERNATIONAL PARKING INSTITUTE 33

How It Works Weather options act in a similar way to insurance but differ in two key aspects: Unlike the long process of collecting on an insurance claim, you will receive payment 30 days from the end of the winter season. The payout is not determined by the costs you incur at your specific location. Instead, you are paid based on the amount of snow at an agreed-upon location. This eliminates the need for a long claims process and minimizes the administrative burden. These products have been around for decades and have been widely adopted by the energy and agriculture sectors. Oil and gas companies can protect themselves against the negative effects of a warm winter, and utilities can save themselves from a decrease in electricity usage in cool summers. Agriculture can protect itself from instances of extreme temperature or precipitation. Following is an overview of the weather derivatives market, a basic explanation of the product s mechanics, and some ways it may benefit the parking industry. History of Weather Derivatives The weather market is rooted in the energy industry and began around the same time as deregulation in the U.S. Energy providers always knew that variability in the weather was probably the largest factor affecting energy consumption. However, these companies were able to absorb the ups and downs of the market because they were operating as monopolies. This provided great financial stability for the energy companies with minimal financial risk. At the time of deregulation, the various entities in the process of producing, marketing, and delivering energy to U.S. households and businesses were forced to confront weather as a significant risk to their bottom line. The first participants in the market energy traders such as Koch Industries and Aquila created and executed the first weather derivative transactions in 1997. The first deals were all structured as protection Table 1 against warmer- or cooler-than-average weather in specific regions for the winter or summer seasons. The early market participants saw weather derivatives as an opportunity to hedge inherent weather exposure in their core assets and a new risk management product to offer to regional utilities. The weather derivatives market has since expanded to the agriculture market and beyond. Bill Windle, managing director of Munich Re and long-time participant in the weather options market, has experienced this growth firsthand. He observes, The weather derivatives industry has grown considerably in recent years. When I first started, we spent most of our time and effort helping those in the energy and agriculture industries mitigate the impact that weather had on their businesses. In recent years, we ve helped everyone from real estate to municipalities manage their weather risk. I like to think that we are helping people take some of the worry out of their budgets. Anatomy of a Weather Derivative Weather derivatives exist primarily in the private or overthe-counter market. This just means the trades are not conducted on exchanges such as the New York Stock Exchange or the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. While the transactions are not completed on exchanges, they are still regulated by the National Futures Association and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. The transactions are executed with one-to-one agreements with the underwriter, or person taking the opposite position on the trade. In the weather derivatives market, these underwriters are large, highly regulated, international insurance and reinsurance companies, such as Munich Re, Swiss Re, and Nephila Capital. There are two primary references that need to be identified before using a weather option to manage your snow removal costs: quantifying the impact of an inch of snow for your location and identifying when you want the option to start paying you. Once that has been completed, determining the other components of the Reference Weather Station Index (Weather Statistic) Term (Timeframe) Strike (Trigger) Payout Premium Example Contract Structure All contracts are settled based on a measurement of weather at a particular weather station. These stations are operated and monitored by the NOAA, a thrid-party government entity. This is the measure of the weather that will define the payout of the weather derivative contract. The statistic most applicable to snow removal is inches of snow at the closest weather station. Contracts have a defined start and end date that define the period that the weather statistic is calculated. The most common term for winter season contracts is Nov. 1 through March 31. A specific amount of snowfall is identified that determines the point that you would like the option to begin paying. Businesses will define this measurement based on risk appetite and strategy. The contract will have a defined payment that mirrors the expenses that your locations endure as a result of snowfall. The payout will occur as a function of snowfall above or below the defined trigger. The buyer of a weather option pays a premium to the seller that is typically 10 to 20 percent of the overall value of the contract. This may vary substantially depending on risk profile. An example of a trade to mitigate snow removal costs in Baltimore, Md., would be: payout of $10,000 per inch of snow at BWI Airport for every inch above 20'' between Nov. 1 and March 31. ISTOCK / COLOROFTIME 34 INTERNATIONAL PARKING INSTITUTE SEPTEMBER 2016

Figure 1 Figure 1 Snow Removal in Avg Snow Year Average Annual Snowfall Figure 2 Option Payout w/ Avg Strike Snow removal expenses increase with snowfall and are highly variable on a year-to-year basis. The red line in Figure 1 represents the increase in snow removal costs as the seasonal snowfall rises. These expenses are usually recognized at the property level and can severely damage annual budgets. To offset snow removal expenses in years with high snowfall, a call option is purchased. The blue line in Figure 2 represents the payout of the option as the snowfall total for the season increases. In this example, the option has a strike at the average snow amount and pays a pre-determined and increasing amount for every inch over that strike. In Figure 3 the hedge payout and the increasing expenses are layered together. You can see that the cost of the hedge, or premium, creates a slight increase in expenses in low snow years. However, the payout offsets the above-average expenses when the option is in the money. Figure 4 illustrates the resulting budget predictability as a result of the hedge. are capped at a predictable value that is slightly above the historical annual average. This cap still allows for positive budget Figure 3 Option Payout Annual Average Layering the Hedge Into Budget w/o Hedge Hedge Premium Budgeted w/ Hedge transaction (weather station, index, term, strike, payout, and premium) is relatively straightforward. Table 1 defines the factors required to enter a hedging agreement. After the agreement is entered, the premium is paid to the underwriter. At the end of the agreed-upon term (in this example: March 31), if the snowfall for the identified weather station is above the strike amount, the option is considered in the money. This means that you will receive the payout that corresponds to the incremental amount identified in your contract. Using the sample contract from Table 1, the payout would be $200,000 in the event that it snowed 40 inches at Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport. (40 inches-20 inches = 20 inches; 20 inches x $10,000 = $200,000). Mechanics We will now walk through a step-by-step graphical illustration of the effect hedging against snowfall can have on your budget. For simplicity, we will address snow removal costs only, not lost revenue. Figure 4 Variable are Capped in Budget Average Annual Snowfall parking.org/tpp SEPTEMBER 2016 INTERNATIONAL PARKING INSTITUTE 35

Snow Removal $160,000 $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 Unhedged Expense Net Expense Figure 5 $0 '20 '40 '80 Seasonal Snowfall (in) SHANE BELVIN is managing director of Nobel Weather Associates. He can be reached at shane@ nobelweather.com. variances in low-snow years, allowing you to come in under budget while de-risking your parking portfolio. Case Study Now that we have gone through the anatomy of a weather hedge, let s look at an actual example of weather options being used to manage snow removal expenses. This location is a class A office building located in Elgin, Ill. The average seasonal snowfall for the location is 40 inches, with an average snow removal expense of roughly $80,000. The property manager, with the help of an adviser, chose a hedge that paid out $2,500 per inch for every inch above 40 inches. The premium for this transaction was roughly $18,000. As you can see in Figure 5, the snow removal expenses in the average year are increased by the amount of the option premium. It is also worth noting that the net expense (the costs of snowplowing, plus the cost of the hedge, minus the option payout) ended up actually being less in the historically high, 80-inch, snow season. Possible Effects Outside of budget certainty and cost savings, there are a number of additional benefits that can come from removing the volatility of weather. Many parking service providers choose to pass winter maintenance costs directly through to their clients. As clients continue to look toward bundled services, synthetically fixing snow removal costs may allow managers to add services to their scope of work without risking margins. Additionally, any opportunity to help clients (owners, municipalities, investors) save money might lead to longer contract terms and stickier relationships. It can also allow vendors to remain profitable and provide quality service rather than losing money in high-snow years. Lastly, we must think about how weather affects revenue, not just expenses. The examples used here have been largely applicable to parking lots. However, numerous locations have had their revenue affected by the rough winter of 2014-15 or the East Coast blizzard of 2016. Even if you are operating garage locations, you were likely affected if you operate around a leisure or tourist location. As with all financial instruments, you must always ensure that you understand all the risks and benefits related to weather options. This overview hopes to provide those in the parking sector with information that may be useful in analyzing their weather-related financial risks and understand that there are products out there designed to mitigate those risks. The information herein should not be construed or interpreted as recommending any investment in any particular product, instrument, or security and should not be relied on as the sole source of information upon which to base an investment decision. We recommend that you always do your homework to understand the needs and health of your business before deciding what financial programs are best for you. As we look toward the 2016-17 winter, there might be a few tools out there that can help make the process a little less uncertain and a lot more bearable. 36 INTERNATIONAL PARKING INSTITUTE SEPTEMBER 2016