New Physics Scales to be Lepton Colliders (CEPC)

Similar documents
Higgs Boson: from Collider Test to SUSY GUT Inflation

at the Higgs factory

Precision of Higgs Couplings at CEPC

Potential Discoveries at the Large Hadron Collider. Chris Quigg

Tim Barklow (SLAC) April 13, 2016 Experimental Challenges for the LHC Run II, KITP

PROSPECTS FOR MEASURING HIGGS CP VIOLATION AT FUTURE COLLIDERS

Phenomenology of the Higgs Triplet Model at the LHC

CEPC NOTE CEPC-RECO April 1, Higgs Signal Reconstruction at CEPC-v4 Baseline Detector for the CEPC CDR. CEPC Simulation Group

LHC Higgs Signatures from Extended Electroweak Guage Symmetry

Basics of Higgs Physics

Higgs Coupling Measurements!

CEPC Simulation: next step & Wish list to the MC Tool

Higgs physics at the ILC

KITP, Dec. 17, Tao Han

Wei-Ming Yao(LBNL) For CEPC Physics and Simulation Group

Can the Hbb coupling be equal in magnitude to its Standard Model value but opposite in sign? Howard E. Haber July 22, 2014

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 5 Sep 2014

Higgs Physics. Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) November 26, 2004, at KEK

The search for the (SM) Higgs Boson

Searching exotic decay channels of the SM Higgs boson at CEPC

CEPC Theory Discussion

The Higgs boson. Marina Cobal University of Udine

Higgs Searches and Properties Measurement with ATLAS. Haijun Yang (on behalf of the ATLAS) Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Higgs Signals and Implications for MSSM

The HL-LHC physics program

Detector Requirements for Precision Higgs Boson Physics

Higgs Searches and Properties Measurement with ATLAS 杨海军 ( 上海交通大学 )

Prospects and challenges for future ee and ep colliders

HUNTING FOR THE HIGGS

Matter, antimatter, colour and flavour in particle physics

Natural Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in NMSSM and Higgs at 100 GeV

Day2: Physics at TESLA

8.882 LHC Physics. Higgs Physics and Other Essentials. [Lecture 22, April 29, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements

Higgs Bosons Phenomenology in the Higgs Triplet Model

IX. Electroweak unification

Dmitri Sidorov Oklahoma State University On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration DIS2014, 04/28/2014

Why a muon collider?

Decoupling and Alignment in Light of the Higgs Data. Howard E. Haber Pi Day, 2014 Bay Area ParCcle Physics Seminar San Francisco State Univ.

ATLAS Run II Exotics Results. V.Maleev (Petersburg Nucleare Physics Institute) on behalf of ATLAS collaboration

COLLIDER STUDIES OF HIGGS TRIPLET MODEL

Results from the Tevatron: Standard Model Measurements and Searches for the Higgs. Ashutosh Kotwal Duke University

Higgs Property Measurement with ATLAS

Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model

Higgs quantum numbers and couplings. E. Pianori University Of Warwick On behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations

What the Higgs is going on? (beyond the SM)

Hunting for the Higgs Boson. Ulrich Heintz Brown University

The BEH-Mechanism in the SM. m f = λ f. Coupling of Higgs boson to other particles fixed by particle mass and vev

The Standard Model and Beyond

Abdelhak DJOUADI ( LPT Orsay)

Channels and Challenges: Higgs Search at the LHC

The Higgs Mechanism and Electroweak Symmetry Breaking at e + e - Colliders

HIGGS&AT&LHC. Electroweak&symmetry&breaking&and&Higgs& Shahram&Rahatlou. Fisica&delle&Par,celle&Elementari,&Anno&Accademico&

Jürgen R. Reuter, DESY. BSM Physics at High-Energy ee Colliders

Higgs Prospects for future (HL)LHC runs

COLLIDER STUDIES OF HIGGS TRIPLET MODEL

Lecture 23. November 16, Developing the SM s electroweak theory. Fermion mass generation using a Higgs weak doublet

Search for Higgs Bosons at LEP. Haijun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Physics at the LHC: from Standard Model to new discoveries

Physics at Photon Colliders. Prof. Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University

CEPC Input to the ESPP Physics and Detector

Finding the Higgs boson

Beyond the Standard Model

Tevatron Physics Prospects. Paul Grannis, for the CDF and DØ collaborations ICFA Seminar, Oct

Teoria e fenomenologia dei modelli di Higgs composto. Roberto Contino - CERN

The Higgs boson. as a window to Beyond the Standard Model Physics. Roberto Contino. Università di Roma La Sapienza

Elementary Particles II

Higgs Top couplings. Zhen Liu. Based on work with Ian Low and Lian-Tao Wang, to appear

Higgs and Dark Photon Searches

Higgs physics at the LHC

ATLAS+CMS Higgs run 1 Combinations

Higgs searches in CMS

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Measuring the Higgs CP property at LHC and CEPC

Minimal Flavor Violating Z boson. Xing-Bo Yuan. Yonsei University

Problems for SM/Higgs (I)

Properties of the Higgs Boson, and its interpretation in Supersymmetry

Physics at Hadron Colliders

Probing the Majorana nature in radiative seesaw models at collider experiments

Higgs Boson Phenomenology Lecture I

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 17 Apr 2000

CMS Higgs Results Adi Bornheim Caltech

Higgs couplings and mass measurements with ATLAS. Krisztian Peters CERN On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration

November 24, Scalar Dark Matter from Grand Unified Theories. T. Daniel Brennan. Standard Model. Dark Matter. GUTs. Babu- Mohapatra Model

The Higgs discovery - a portal to new physics

A model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:

Moriond QCD La Thuile, March 14 21, Flavour physics in the LHC era. An introduction. Clara Matteuzzi. INFN and Universita Milano-Bicocca

Search for physics beyond the Standard Model at LEP 2

Measurements of the Higgs Boson at the LHC and Tevatron

Discovery of the Higgs Boson

Light Higgs Discovery Potential with ATLAS, Measurements of Couplings and

perturbativity Pankaj Sharma Based on : arxiv: st September, 2012 Higgs-electroweak precision, vacuum stability and perturbativity

HIGGS AT HADRON COLLIDER

Higgs Candidate Property Measurements with the Compact Muon Solenoid. Andrew Whitbeck * for the CMS Collaboration. Johns Hopkins University

Dark Matter and Gauged Baryon Number

model-independent determination of Higgs e+e- colliders

Search for Fermionic Higgs Boson Decays in pp Collisions at ATLAS and CMS

Top quark mass at ATLAS and CMS

Higgs Top couplings. Zhen Liu. Based on work with Ian Low and Lian-Tao Wang, to appear

Hidden two-higgs doublet model

Measurements of the W Boson Mass and Trilinear Gauge Boson Couplings at the Tevatron

Transcription:

New Physics Scales to be Probed @ Lepton Colliders (CEPC) Shao-Feng Ge (gesf02@gmail.com) Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany 2016-1-11 Contribution to CEPC precdr & CDR Collaboration with Hong-Jian He & Rui-Qing Xiao arxiv:1603.03385

Higgs discovery is not just about H particle Force Mediators Gauge Forces Spin-1 Gauge Bosons Gravity Spin-2 Graviton (?) New Force Spin-0 Higgs Boson Deep understanding of Mass Generation Yukawa Forces Hierarchy & Mixing (Flavor Symmetries?) Discrete v.s. Continuous Full v.s. Residual [1104.0602, 1108.0964, 1308.6522] Higgs Self-Interaction Forces h 3 & h 4 (concerns spontaneous EWSB and providing masses to all particles). True Self-Interactions Exactly the Same Quantum # Spin Charge Both Yukawa & Self-Interaction forces associated with spin-0 Higgs were Never Seen Before. Needs to be directly tested.

Current Status LEP/Tevatron/LHC have good tests only on gauge forces. Higgs Yukawa Force is Flavor-Dependent + Huge Hierarchy. LHC has limited sensitivity to Yukawa couplings of htt, hbb, hτ τ @ the order of 15% 30%. LHC cannot probe other Yukawa Couplings! Higgs Self-Interaction is also difficult @ LHC Run-I. +0.14 κ W = 0.95-0.13 +0.16 κ Z = 1.05-0.16 +0.19 κ t = 0.81-0.15 +0.33 κ b = 0.74-0.29 +0.19 κ τ = 0.84-0.18 < 1.87 κ µ 1412.8662 CMS -1-1 19.7 fb (8 TeV) + 5.1 fb (7 TeV) 68% CL 95% CL 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Parameter value 1/2 /2v) or (g λ f V 10 1-1 -2 10-3 10-4 10 CMS µ 68% CL 95% CL -1-1 19.7 fb (8 TeV) + 5.1 fb (7 TeV) SM Higgs b τ (M, ε) fit W Z t 68% CL 95% CL 0.1 1 10 100 Particle mass (GeV)

Standard Model is Incomplete! Mass Generation Yukawa force is Flavor-Dependent & Hierarchically Unnatural Higgs mass itself is Radiatively Unnatural Vacuum Stability Neutrino Oscillation Dark Matter Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry Vacuum Energy & Inflation Pole top mass Mt in GeV 175 170 Instability 10 12 1,2,3 Σ 10 10 1205.6497 165 115 120 125 130 5 h Meta stability Stability

Beyond SM? NO particle beyond SM discovered @ LHC yet! 1.9TeV di-boson? 750GeV di-photon? Full/Precise Picture of New Physics @ Higher Energy? Even within SM, we are strongly motivated to quantitatively test Yukawa and Higgs Self-Interaction Forces! Precision Measurement + Discovery Machine: SLAC? + Sp ps [W/Z Masses] LEP + (Tevatron [t] + LHC [h]) Go beyond! CEPC (e + e, 250 GeV) SppC (pp, 50-100 TeV)

Higgs Factory @ 250 GeV LHC tells us: h(125) is SM-like Dream Case for Experiments! CEPC produces h(125) via e + e Zh, ν νh, e + e h Indirect Probe to New Physics. 5/ab with 2 detectors in 10y 10 6 Higgs Relative Error 10 3. e + Z H e Z e + e W W - ν H ν e + e Z Z e + H e

Production & Background Processes Large Statistics 10 6 Higgs Relative Error 10 3. Clean Background Easy for Simulation [Loop Calculation] Polarization

Mo, Li, Ruan & Lou, Chin.Phys.C 2015

e + e Zh Recoil Mass Distribution: m 2 rec ( s E ff ) 2 p 2 ff Cross Section: σ(zh) Γ(h ZZ) Higgs Mass: m h Higgs Width: Γ h Branching Ratios: Model-Independent Invisible Decay

Combination of Various Channels σ(zh) [0.51%] h bb [0.28%], cc [2.2%], gg [1.6%]

Combination of Various Channels h ZZ [4.3%] h WW [1.5%] h τ τ [1.2%] h γγ [9.0%] h µµ [17%] h invisible [0.14%] CEPC: http://cepc.ihep.ac.cn/

Extracting the Physics Potential Coupling: Cross Section: δσ(zh) g hii g sm hii σ(zh) 2δκ Z, Decay Width: Γ hii Γ sm hii Branching Ratio: Γ i = κ 2 i, κ i 1 + δκ i. Γ inv Γ sm tot Br i Br sm i 1 + Γ tot j with coefficients, δσ(ν νh) σ(ν νh) 2δκ W. = Br(inv) δκ inv. A ij δκ j, Br inv δκ inv. A ij = 2(δ ij Br sm j ), A i,inv = 1, A inv,i = 0, A inv,inv = 1.

Inputs: Event Rate Cross Section & BR SM Predictions: M h Γ h σ(zh) σ(ν νh) Br(h bb) 5.9 MeV 2.8% 0.51% 2.8% Decay Mode σ(zh) Br Br h bb 0.28% 0.57% h cc 2.2% 2.3% h gg 1.6% 1.7% h ττ 1.2% 1.3% h WW 1.5% 1.6% h ZZ 4.3% 4.3% h γγ 9.0% 9.0% h µµ 17% 17% h invisible 0.14% Br(b b) Br(c c) Br(gg) Br(τ τ) Br(WW ) Br(ZZ) Br(γγ) Br(µ µ) Br(inv) 58.1% 2.10% 7.40% 6.64% 22.5% 2.77% 0.243% 0.023% 0

Precision on Higgs Couplings CEPC precdr Table: Precisions on measuring Higgs couplings at CEPC (250GeV, 5ab 1 ), in comparison with LHC (14TeV, 300fb 1 ), HL-LHC (14TeV, 3ab 1 ) and ILC (250GeV, 250fb 1 )+(500GeV, 500fb 1 ). Precision (%) CEPC LHC HL-LHC ILC-250+500 κ Z 0.254 0.254 8.5 6.3 0.50 κ W 1.22 1.22 5.4 3.3 0.46 κ γ 4.67 4.67 9.0 6.5 8.6 κ g 1.52 1.52 6.9 4.8 2.0 κ b 1.29 1.29 14.9 8.5 0.97 κ c 1.69 1.69 2.6 κ τ 1.40 1.40 9.5 6.5 2.0 κ µ 8.59 Br inv 0.138 0.138 8.0 4.0 0.52 Γ h 2.8 2.8 LHC & ILC from 1312.4974

Precision on Higgs Couplings CEPC precdr

Precision on Higgs Couplings 1/2 /2v) or (g λ f V 10 1-1 -2 10-3 10-4 10 CMS µ 68% CL 95% CL -1-1 19.7 fb (8 TeV) + 5.1 fb (7 TeV) SM Higgs b τ (M, ε) fit W Z t 68% CL 95% CL 0.1 1 10 100 Particle mass (GeV) Particle Mass / VEV [246 GeV] 10 0 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 CEPC c τ µ 95% CL 0.1 1 10 100 b Particle Mass [GeV] 68% CL SM Higgs Z W

Precision on Higgs Couplings CEPC precdr

Higgs Self-Coupling Rescaling of the trilinear term h 3 L = 1 3! δκ h3λ sm hhh h3. Affect σ(zh) via Loop Correction Constrained by σ(zh) meansurement δσ(zh) σ(zh) 2 δκ Z + 0.014 δκ h3. 1312.3322

Higgs Self-Coupling Precision (%) 80 70 60 50 40 30 HL-LHC (3ab -1 ) CEPC1 (1ab -1 ) CEPC3 (3ab -1 ) CEPC5 (5ab -1 ) CEPC10 (10ab -1 ) SPPC3 (3ab -1 ) SPPC30 (30ab -1 ) CEPC precdr 20 10 0 HL-LHC CEPC1 CEPC3 CEPC5 CEPC10 SPPC3 SPPC30

CEPC Test of Higgs CP Violation 1308.1094 LHC: h ZZ, τ τ CEPC: h τ τ L hττ y τ 2 h τ(cos + iγ 5 sin )τ. Complex enough to retain info about the τ spin. h τ + + τ ρ + ν τ + ρ ν τ π + π 0 ν τ + π π 0 ν τ. CP-even part (cos ) in p-wave & CP-odd (sin ) in s-wave. Precision Measurement @ CEPC Higgs Report

Effective Field Approach Unitarity see also 1411.0676 New physics appears @ high energy scale & can only be probed Indirectly L = L SM + y ij Λ 10 14 GeV (L i H)( H L j ) + c i Λ 2 O i. ij i SM Gauge Invariance is respected O H 1 2 ( µ H 2 ) 2, O T 1 2 (H Dµ H) 2, O WW g 2 H 2 W a µνw a,µν, O BB g 2 H 2 B µν B µν, O WB gg H σ a HW a µνb µν, O HB ig (D µ H) (D ν H)B µν, O HW ig(d µ H) σ a (D ν H)W a µν, O (3) L (ih σ a Dµ H)(Ψ L γ µ σ a Ψ L ), O (3) LL (Ψ Lγ µ σ a Ψ L )(Ψ L γ µ σ a Ψ L ), O L (ih Dµ H)(Ψ L γ µ Ψ L ), O g g 2 s H 2 G a µνg aµν, O R (ih Dµ H)(ψ R γ µ ψ R ).

Scheme-Independent Analysis EW Parameters: M (SM) Z = M (r) Z ( 1 + δm Z M Z which can be denoted as Observables: ) (, G (SM) F = G (r) F 1 + δg ) ( F, α (SM) = α (r) 1 + δα ). G F α f (SM) f (r) + δf f (r) ( 1 + δf f X X(f (SM) ) + δx = X(f (r) ) + X (f )δf + δx ) Analytical Fit: χ 2 ( δm Z, δg F, δα, c i Λ 2 ) = j [ ( O th j δmz, δg F, δα, c ) ] i Λ O exp 2 2 j, O j

Scheme-Independent Analysis Observables: EWPO + HO Observables Central Value Relative Error SM Prediction M Z 91.1876GeV 2.3 10 5 M W 80.385GeV 1.87 10 4 G F 1.1663787 10 5 GeV 2 5.14 10 7 α 7.2973525698 10 3 3.29 10 10 σ[zh] 0.51% σ[ν νh] 2.86% σ[ν νh] 350GeV 0.75% Br[WW ] 1.6% 22.5% Br[ZZ] 4.3% 2.77% Br[bb] 0.57% 58.1% Br[cc] 2.3% 2.10% Br[gg] 1.7% 7.40% Br[ττ] 1.3% 6.64% Br[γγ] 9.0% 0.243% Br[µµ] 17% 0.023% Fitting Parameters: EW: M (SM) Z = M (r) Z ( ) 1 + δm Z M, G (SM) Z F dim-6 Higgs Operators: c i ( ) = G (r) F 1 + δg F G, α (SM) = α (r) ( 1 + δα ) F α.

Sensitivities from Existing EWPO & Future HO 14 12 New Physics Scales to be Probed at CEPC via dim-6 Operators 95% EWPO+HO 5σ Λ/ c j (TeV) 10 8 6 4 1/4 2 0 c H c T c WW c BB c WB c HW c HB c (3) LL c (3) L c L c R c (3) Lq c Lq c Ru c Rd c g 1603.03385

Enhancement from M Z & M W @ CEPC Observables Current Relative Error CEPC M Z 2.3 10 5 5.5 10 6 1.1 10 5 M W 1.9 10 4 3.7 10 5 6.2 10 5 Table: The M Z and M W @ CEPC [Z.Liang, Z & W Physics @ CEPC ]. Scheme-Independent Analysis Λ ci [TeV ] O H O T O WW O BB O WB O HW O HB O (3) LL O (3) L O L O R O (3) L,q O L,q O R,u O R,d O g HO+EWPO 2.74 10.6 6.38 5.78 6.53 2.15 0.603 8.57 12.1 10.2 8.78 1.85 0.565 0.391 0.337 39.8 +M Z 2.74 10.7 6.38 5.78 6.54 2.15 0.603 8.61 12.1 10.2 8.78 1.85 0.565 0.391 0.337 39.8 +M W 2.74 21.0 6.38 5.78 10.4 2.15 0.603 15.5 16.4 10.2 8.78 1.85 0.565 0.391 0.337 39.8 +M Z,W 2.74 23.7 6.38 5.78 11.6 2.15 0.603 17.4 18.1 10.2 8.78 1.85 0.565 0.391 0.337 39.8 Table: Impacts of the projected M Z and M W measurements at CEPC on the reach of new physics scale Λ/ c j (in TeV) at 95% C.L. The Higgs observables (including σ(ν νh) at 350 GeV) and the existing electroweak precision observables are always included in each row. The differences among the four rows arise from whether taking into account the measurements of M Z and M W or not. The second (third) row contains the measurement of M Z (M W ) alone, while the first (last) row contains none (both) of them. We mark the entries of the most significant improvements from M Z /M W measurements in red color. SFG, Hong-Jian He, Rui-Qing Xiao, 1603.03385

Enhancement from Z-Pole Observables @ CEPC N ν A FB (b) R b R µ R τ sin 2 θ w 1.8 10 3 1.5 10 3 8 10 4 5 10 4 5 10 4 1 10 4 Table: The Z-pole measurements at CEPC [Z.Liang, Z & W Physics @ CEPC ]. Z-Pole Observables are IMPORTANT for New Physics Scale Probe O H O T O WW O BB O WB O HW O HB O (3) LL O (3) L O L O R O (3) L,q O L,q O R,u O R,d O g 2.74 23.7 6.38 5.78 11.6 2.15 0.603 17.4 18.1 10.2 8.78 1.85 0.565 0.391 0.337 39.8 2.74 23.7 6.38 5.78 11.6 2.15 0.603 17.5 18.3 10.5 8.78 1.85 0.565 0.391 0.337 39.8 2.74 24.0 8.32 5.80 12.2 2.15 0.603 20.7 23.0 12.5 13.0 2.08 1.62 0.391 3.97 39.8 2.74 24.0 8.33 5.80 12.2 2.15 0.603 20.7 23.0 12.5 13.0 7.90 7.89 3.55 4.05 39.8 2.74 24.0 8.54 5.80 12.2 2.15 0.603 20.7 23.4 14.4 14.0 8.63 8.62 4.88 4.71 39.8 2.74 24.0 8.75 5.80 12.3 2.15 0.603 20.7 23.7 15.8 14.9 9.21 9.21 5.59 5.17 39.8 2.74 26.3 12.6 5.93 15.3 2.15 0.603 30.2 35.2 19.8 21.6 9.21 9.21 5.59 5.17 39.8 Table: Impacts of the projected Z-pole measurements at the CEPC on the reach of new physics scale Λ/ c j (in TeV) at 95% C.L. For comparison, the first row of this table repeats the last row of Table??, as our starting point of this table. For the (n + 1)-th row, the first n observables are taken into account. In addition, the estimated M Z and M W measurements at the CEPC, the Higgs observables (HO), and the existing electroweak precision observables (EWPO) are always included for each row. The entries with major enhancements of the new physics scale limit are marked in red color. A factor of 2 enhancement from Z-Pole Observables

Sensitivity from EWPO+HO+Z-Pole 40 35 New Physics Scales to be Probed at CEPC via dim-6 Operators 95% EWPO+HO+Z-Pole 5σ 30 Λ/ c j (TeV) 25 20 15 10 5 0 c H c T c WW c BB c WB c HW c HB c (3) LL c (3) L c L c R c (3) Lq c Lq c Ru c Rd c g 1603.03385

Summary Higgs Discovery is not just about New Particle, but also New Force! Yukawa Force: Non-Trivial Mixing & Hierarchically Unnatural Higgs Self-Interaction Force: Radiatively Unnatural New Physics Neutrino Oscillation Dark Matter Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry Vacuum Energy & Inflation LHC Discovery Machine vs Poor sensitivity CEPC 10 6 Higgs Higgs Coupling O(1%) Level Higgs Self-Coupling 30% Precise measurement of CP 2.5 Probe new physics to 10 TeV (40 TeV for O g ) [35 TeV @ Z-Pole]

Thank You!