ATLAS Level-1 trigger studies for the invisibly decaying Higgs boson produced in vector boson fusion

Similar documents
Triggering on Long-lived neutral particles in ATLAS

ATLAS Discovery Potential of the Standard Model Higgs Boson

2 ATLAS operations and data taking

Upgrade of ATLAS and CMS for High Luminosity LHC: Detector performance and Physics potential

VBF SM Higgs boson searches with ATLAS

Physics with Tau Lepton Final States in ATLAS. Felix Friedrich on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration

Physics potential of ATLAS upgrades at HL-LHC

Risultati dell esperimento ATLAS dopo il run 1 di LHC. C. Gemme (INFN Genova), F. Parodi (INFN/University Genova) Genova, 28 Maggio 2013

Light Higgs Discovery Potential with ATLAS, Measurements of Couplings and

Measurement of the Higgs Couplings by Means of an Exclusive Analysis of its Diphoton decay

8.882 LHC Physics. Higgs Physics and Other Essentials. [Lecture 22, April 29, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements

Studies of top pair production in the fully hadronic channel at LHC with CMS

B-physics with ATLAS and CMS

Trigger di primo livello per gli esperimenti ATLAS & CMS ad LHC

THE ATLAS TRIGGER SYSTEM UPGRADE AND PERFORMANCE IN RUN 2

HIGGS Bosons at the LHC

Title Text. ATLAS Higgs Boson Discovery Potential

ATLAS-CONF October 15, 2010

PERFORMANCE OF THE ATLAS MUON TRIGGER IN RUN 2

The ATLAS muon and tau triggers

Discovery potential of the SM Higgs with ATLAS

The ATLAS trigger - commissioning with cosmic rays

Jet reconstruction in LHCb searching for Higgs-like particles

Jet reconstruction with first data in ATLAS

Higgs Boson Searches at ATLAS

Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson in H WW lν lν with the ATLAS experiment

Yoshikazu NAGAI (CPPM, Aix Marseille Université)

Searches for exotica at LHCb

ATLAS HLT Steering. Andrey Belkin Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz

QCD Jets at the LHC. Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago. on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations

Preparations for SUSY searches at the LHC

LHC State of the Art and News

Physics at Hadron Colliders

Rare B decays in ATLAS and CMS

ZZ 4l measurement with the first ATLAS data

How to make the most of LHC data

Searching for the Higgs at the LHC

Physics at Tevatron. Koji Sato KEK Theory Meeting 2005 Particle Physics Phenomenology March 3, Contents

Higgs couplings and mass measurements with ATLAS. Krisztian Peters CERN On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration

Physics at the LHC. Academic Training, Part 3: Experiment and Standard Model

Physics at Hadron Colliders Part II

The ATLAS C. Gemme, F.Parodi

ATLAS Run 2 Higgs Prospects

Early physics with Atlas at LHC

Higgs HL-LHC perspectives from ATLAS and CMS

The ATLAS Detector - Inside Out Julia I. Hofmann

Preparations for SUSY searches at the LHC

Mini-Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CMS

CMS Higgs Results Adi Bornheim Caltech

CMS Status and the US-CMS DAQ projects

The trigger system of the ATLAS experiment

The HL-LHC physics program

ATLAS CSC NOTE 10. August 14, Sensitivity to an invisibly decaying Higgs boson with ATLAS data

Higgs Boson Production at the LHC

B-Tagging in ATLAS: expected performance and and its calibration in data

Search for Fermionic Higgs Boson Decays in pp Collisions at ATLAS and CMS

Jet Energy Scale in ATLAS

Jets triggers for the ATLAS experiment

Discovery potential for SUGRA/SUSY at CMS

Recent Developments in Little Higgs Searches. at LHC

La ricerca dell Higgs Standard Model a CDF

4. LHC experiments Marcello Barisonzi LHC experiments August

Study of supersymmetric tau final states with Atlas at LHC: discovery prospects and endpoint determination

Extra dimensions and black holes at the LHC

Taller de Altas Energías Michael Holzbock September 7, LMU Munich

QCD Studies at LHC with the Atlas detector

7 Physics at Hadron Colliders

SUSY Search Strategies at Atlas and CMS

The ATLAS Run 2 Trigger: Design, Menu, Performance and Operational Aspects

Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II

Probing SUSY Dark Matter at the LHC

Searching for Beyond Standard Model Physics with Top Quarks at the ATLAS Detector

The ATLAS Detector at the LHC

Reconstruction and identification of hadronic τ decays with ATLAS

Application of the Tau Identification Capability of CMS in the Detection of Associated Production of MSSM Heavy Neutral Higgs Bosons Souvik Das

Measurement of the Inclusive Isolated Prompt Photon Cross Section at CDF

A Measurement Of WZ/ZZ ll+jj Cross Section. Rahmi Unalan Michigan State University Thesis Defense

Exclusive Central π+π- Production in Proton Antiproton Collisions at the CDF

Perspectives of Higgs measurements at High-Luminosity LHC

Results from combined CMS-TOTEM data

Motivations for a L1 Track Trigger

Measurement of the associated production of direct photons and jets with the Atlas experiment at LHC. Michele Cascella

Prospects for early discoveries in final states. LRSM and Leptoquarks

J. C. Vasquez CCTVal & USM

Higgs Searches at CMS

CDF top quark " $ )(! # % & '

Recent searches for new particles using 13 TeV data with ATLAS at the LHC

Ridge correlation structure in high multiplicity pp collisions with CMS

Two Early Exotic searches with dijet events at ATLAS

Jet Energy Calibration. Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool

Higgs Production at LHC

Atlas results on diffraction

Atlas Status and Perspectives

Top Physics at CMS. Intae Yu. Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Korea Yonsei University, Sep 12 th, 2013

Early SUSY searches at the LHC

QCD at CDF. Régis Lefèvre IFAE Barcelona On behalf of the CDF Collaboration

Search for long-lived particles at CMS

Search for a heavy scalar boson decaying into a pair of Z bosons in the 2l2ν final state in CMS

Dark matter at LHC (Mostly ATLAS) Ian Hinchliffe LBNL

Efficiency of the CMS Level-1 Trigger to. Selected Physics Channels

Transcription:

ATLAS Level-1 trigger studies for the invisibly decaying Higgs boson produced in vector boson fusion Guilherme Nunes Hanninger Markus Schumacher (Uni Siegen) Maria Laach, Sept. 2007

Invisibly decaying Higgs boson If: There are new weakly interacting particles with mass less than half the Higgs mass (mh) and mh is smaller than 160 GeV ~2mW, so that the Higgs partial width into SM particles is very small, the Higgs boson might predominantly decay into these new weakly interacting particles. If these new particles are neutral and stable, the Higgs boson will decay invisibly! 2

Higgs Invisible Inv. decaying Higgs boson appears in several extensions of the SM: eg.: SUSY, Dark matter, theories with extra space dimensions, 4th generation neutrinos, general scalar gauge singlet added to the SM,... Vector Boson Inv. VBF Higgs signature: Fusion (VBF) two jets in opposite hemisphere production channel is the most promising if trigger is feasible! considerable missing transverse energy cross section: ~3.5 pb (mh=130 GeV/c2) Main source of background at LVL1 trigger: Multi-jet production via purely QCD processes (QCDjj - ~20mb; pt>8 GeV/c) 3

VBF Higgs Invisible Offline event selection: ATL-PHYS-2003-006 4

Signal jets topology: Full simulation Central Jets ( η <3.2) Mixed 1 Jet ( η <3.2) 1 Jet (3.2< η <4.9) Forward Jets (3.2< η <4.9) mh = 110GeV/c2 19±3% 68±4% 13±3% mh = 130GeV/c2 14.2±2.0% 69.3±2.6% 16.5±2.1% mh = 200GeV/c2 23±3% 66±3% 11±2% Need to trigger on central and forward jets if 2 jets are required! Higgs mass has low influence in the jets topology -3.2<η<3.2 4.67 <θ<175.33-4.9<η<4.9 0.85 <θ<179.15 5

LHC: pp collisions: High Energy: s=14tev Luminosity 3 initial years: L=2 10 33 cm 2 s 1 after: 34 L=10 cm s 2 1 Bunch crossing rate: t =25ns 40MHz 23 events per bunch crossing (minimum bias) 6

The trigger challenge: rate total interaction rate Bunch Crossing: 40MHz Interaction rate: 1GHz 1PB/sec Affordable mass storage: 300MB/sec Storage rate: ~200Hz Online rejection: 99.9995% storage rate Powerful trigger needed: discoveries Highly selective; as inclusive as possible maximize the physics coverage open to new and unforeseen signatures configuration must be flexible 7

ATLAS trigger: Overview software hardware Level-1: decision based on data from calorimeters and muon trigger chambers 2.5 µs Level-2: uses Regions of Interest (identified by the level-1trigger) data (ca. 2%) with full granularity from all detectors Event Filter: has access to full event ~ 10 ms and can perform more refined event reconstruction ~ 1 sec. Regions of Interest 8

LVL1 Trigger Studies Level-1 trigger simulation: Full GEANT Simulation (FullLVL-1) Fast Simulation (FastLVL-1) Important for background simulation!! 9

LVL1 Trigger Studies Evaluating the Central Jet ET ( η <3.2), Forward Jet ET (3.2< η <4.9), and ETmiss underestimation by the level-1 trigger: Full Level-1 simulation, Invisible VBF Higgs (mh=130gev/c2) ET95miss = ETmiss at 95% efficiency Level-1 Example: ETmiss Level-1 cut ET95miss (reco) 20 GeV 50 GeV 150 GeV 57 GeV 88 GeV 213 GeV Level-1 thresholds are significantly below offline values! 10

LVL1 Trigger Studies ETmiss FullLevel-1 trigger simulation: Central Jets Forward Jets 11

LVL1 Trigger Studies FullLVL-1 Jets FastLVL-1 Jets 12

Level-1 Trigger menu High signal acceptance Keep the trigger rate low low trigger thresholds high trigger thresholds trigger menu is a compromise! Goal: level-1 output rates for Invisible VBF Higgs (+BKGD): O(~100Hz) 13

LVL-1 trigger menu: 2 Jets ( <4.9) + ETmiss: QCDjj L=2 1033cm-2s-1 PYTHIA (18mb; pt>8 GeV/c) Signal events (mh=130 GeV) Accep.= Nr. of evt. passed LVL1trig. Offline selec. Number of evt. passed Offline Selec. QCDjj not so sensitive to jet ET thresholds Low threshold for better signal acceptance! 14

LVL-1 trigger menu: 2 Jets ( <4.9) + ETmiss: QCDjj L=2 1033cm-2s-1 PYTHIA (18mb) and HERWIG (14mb) Signal events (mh=130 GeV) Large uncertainty coming from the generator! 15

LVL-1 trigger menu: 2 Jets ( <4.9) + ETmiss: Invisibly decaying Higgs boson produced in VBF: 2 Jets ( <4.9) >20 GeV + ETmiss >? 2 Jets ( <4.9) >20 GeV + ETmiss >50GeV provides signal acceptance above 95% and LVL1 output rate of ~ 50Hz. 16

Level-1 trigger output rates estimation 2 Jets ( <4.9) + ETmiss>60GeV 2 Jets ( <4.9) in opposite hemisphere + ETmiss >60GeV 2 Jets (0.8< <4.9) in opposite hemisphere + ETmiss>60GeV 2 Jets (1.6< <4.9) in opposite hemisphere + ETmiss>60GeV QCDjj Best QCDjj reduction and high Level-1 acceptance! L=2 1033cm-2s-1 level-1 17

Conclusions: @ L=2 1033cm-2s-1 2 Jets ( <4.9) ET>20GeV + ETmiss>50 GeV are recommended for the LVL1 trigger condition for the Invisible VBF Higgs For this configuration: QCDjj Level-1 output rate ~ 50 Hz Signal acceptance @ Level-1 >95% @ L=1034cm-2s-1 needs study with pile-up 2 Jets (1.6< <4.9) in opposite hemisphere + ETmiss might be useful for background suppression and maintain high level-1 trigger acceptance 18

Many Thanks!!

ATLAS Detector: 22m 44m 3

Higgs boson production at LHC GGF VBF WH tth Diplom Kolloquium 8/31

Branch Ratio (BR) Standard Model Higgs boson decay Why investigate the Invisibly decaying Higgs boson? Diplom Kolloquium 9/31

Higgs Invisible Inv. decaying Higgs boson appears in several extensions of the SM: eg.: SUSY, Dark matter containing a stable singlet scalar, theories with extra space dimensions, 4th generation neutrinos, general scalar gauge singlet added to the SM,... VBF seems to be most promising channel if trigger is feasible! ATL-PHYS-PUB-2006-009 6

VBF Higgs Invisible Invisible VBF Higgs signature: two jets in opposite hemisphere considerable missing transverse energy cross section: ~3.5 pb (mh=130 GeV/c2) Main source of background at LVL1 trigger: Multi-jet production via purely QCD processes (QCDjj - ~20mb; pt>8 GeV/c) 7

VBF Higgs Invisible At low luminosity: 2 1033 cm-2s-1 At level-1 trigger: No dedicated trigger menu for invisible VBF Higgs So far, 1 JET ( <3.2) > 50GeV + ETmiss>60GeV (SUSY) (ATL-DAQ-2003-004) No forward jets trigger at LVL-2 yet Only QCDjj background considered (Zjj and Wjj have low rate at LVL1 trigger (<10Hz)) Goal: level-1 output rates for Invisible VBF Higgs (+BKGD): O(~100Hz) LVL-1 trigger menu: High signal acceptance Keep the trigger rate low low trigger thresholds high trigger thresholds trigger menu is a compromise! 9

LVL1 Trigger Studies Level-1 trigger simulation: Full GEANT Simulation (FullLVL-1) Fast Simulation (FastLVL-1) Important for background simulation!! Before the LVL-1 trigger menu studies, investigate the LVL-1 trigger performance: FullLVL-1 (Jet E, Fjet E, E miss) vs. Offline Rec. (GEANT) (Jet E, Fjet E, E miss) FastLVL-1 (Jet E, Fjet E, E miss) vs. Offline Rec. (GEANT) (Jet E, Fjet E, E miss) T T T T T T T T T T T T FullLVL-1 (Jet E, Fjet E, E miss) vs. FastLVL-1 (Jet E, Fjet E, E miss) T T T T T T 10

LVL1 Trigger Studies Level-1 trigger underestimates Jet ET, ETmiss Discrepancies between FastLVL-1 and FullLVL-1 trigger simul. 13

1 Jet ( <3.2)> 50GeV + ETmiss>60GeV (SUSY) (ATL-DAQ-2003-004) Provides 67.6±2.7% acceptance for signal events and a LVL-1 output rate for the QCDjj background of 18.4±1.6Hz at L=2 1033cm-2s-1 2 Jets ( <4.9) + ETmiss 1 FJet (3.2< <4.9) + ETmiss 1 CJet + 1 FJet + ETmiss Topology (e.g.: jets in opposite hemisphere) Eff.= Nr of events passed LVL1 trigger Total number of events Accep.= Nr. of evt. passed LVL1trig. Offline selec. Number of evt. passed Offline Selec. 16

LVL-1 trigger menu: 2 Jets ( <4.9) + ETmiss: Level-1 signal efficiency: FullLVL-1 vs. FastLVL-1 Signal events (mh=130 GeV) FastLevel-1 presented lower efficiency than FullLevel-1 QCD rates might be underestimated! 14

LVL-1 trigger menu: 1CJet + 1FJet +ETmiss: Signal events (mh=130 GeV) QCDjj L=2 1033cm-2s-1 PYTHIA (18mb; pt>8 GeV/c) Provides even lower acceptance than the previous menu! 19

LVL-1 trigger menu: 1FJet (3.2< <4.9)+ETmiss: Signal events (mh=130 GeV) QCDjj L=2 1033cm-2s-1 PYTHIA (18mb; pt>8 GeV/c) Provides lower acceptance than the previous menu! 18

Does topology information helps QCDjj reduction? 2 Jets ( <4.9) in opposite hemisphere + ETmiss 1 Central Jet + 1 Forward Jet in opposite hemisphere + ETmiss L=2 1033cm-2s-1 2 Jets in opposite hemispheres: no significant improvement in the LVL-1 output rate 20

And redefining the boundary between central and forward jets? Signal events (mh=130 GeV/c2) After offline cuts: 25

Conclusions: @ L=2 1033cm-2s-1 2 Jets ( <4.9) ET>20GeV + ETmiss>50 GeV are recommended for the LVL1 trigger condition for the Invisible VBF Higgs For this configuration: QCDjj Level-1 output rate ~ 50 Hz Signal acceptance @ Level-1 >95% If not possible... 1 FJet (3.2< <4.9) ET>20GeV + ETmiss>50 GeV with acceptance ~ 80% and output rate ~ 20Hz @ L=1034cm-2s-1 needs study with pile-up 2 Jets (1.6< <4.9) in opposite hemisphere + ETmiss might be useful for background suppression and maintain high level-1 trigger acceptance 19

Backup Dijet events produced via color singlet exchange: =>New source of Background? Exchange of a color singlet > yield a rapidity gap; The observation of rapidity gaps between jets at both the Tevatron and the DESY implies the exchange of a hard color singlet; The fraction of such events is roughly 1% at Tevatron and 10% at DESY; G. N. Hanninger LVL 1 trigger studies for the VBF Higgs > Inv. ATLAS T&P Week, June 2007 27

DiJets with color singlet exchange: Cross-section: 0.15 mb L=2 1033cm-2s-1 G. N. Hanninger LVL 1 trigger studies for the VBF Higgs > Inv. ATLAS T&P Week, June 2007 28

Observation: distribution for the QCD jets (ATLFAST with FastShower) Entries 0 Entries 0 Entries 0 All Jets G. N. Hanninger 2 highest PT jets LVL 1 trigger studies for the VBF Higgs > Inv. Problem with the FastShower!! ATLAS T&P Week, June 2007 29

Solution for the Asymmetry: Michael Duehrssen: There is a shift of 0.1 for particles with eta< 3.2. The reason is a cast from double to int that doesn't behave as wanted for particles with eta< 3.2. change in FastShowerUtils/FastShowerUtils 00 02 0X/src/GridletForger.cxx the definition of constants at the begin of the file: change : const double mineta = 3.2 to : const double mineta = 5.0 and in FastShowerUtils/FastShowerUtils 00 02 0X/src/Gridlet.cxx, in the constants, change : const double s_phistep = 0.1 to : const double s_phistep = 0.0981748 All Jets G. N. Hanninger LVL 1 trigger studies for the VBF Higgs > Inv. 2 highest PT jets ATLAS T&P Week, June 2007 30

Observation: ETmiss distribution for QCD background produced by ATLFAST (with FastShower) and FASTLVL1; ETmiss FastLVL1 harder than ATLFAST Same distribution, different scale. ETmiss =>10 bit range for the JET RoI!!! Such events with high ETmiss will fire the trigger. G. N. Hanninger LVL 1 trigger studies for the VBF Higgs > Inv. ATLAS T&P Week, June 2007 31

G. N. Hanninger LVL 1 trigger studies for the VBF Higgs > Inv. ATLAS T&P Week, June 2007 30