Very Large Hadron Collider - phase 2 Optimization of the beam screen cooling & Impact of the photon stop on the cryogenic system

Similar documents
A PHOTON-STOP FOR THE VLHC-2 ENGINEERING DESIGN PART 1

Measurements of temperature on LHC thermal models

Supercritical Helium Cooling of the LHC Beam Screens

ANSWERS TO NICOLAAS KOS FOR HIS PAPER Cold Beam Vacuum System for the LHC IR Upgrade Phase-1

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

Higgs Factory Magnet Protection and Machine-Detector Interface

Accelerators. Lecture V. Oliver Brüning. school/lecture5

BEAM SCREEN ISSUES (with 20 T dipole magnets instead of 8.3 T)

Preliminary design of the new HL-LHC beam screen for the low-β triplets

Feasibility of HTS DC Cables on Board a Ship

Large Hadron Collider at CERN

He II Heat transfer through a Corrugated Tube - Test Report

(4) vacuum pressure & gas desorption in the IRs ( A.

SPPC Study and R&D Planning. Jingyu Tang for the SPPC study group IAS Program for High Energy Physics January 18-21, 2016, HKUST

1.1 Electron-Cloud Effects in the LHC

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Preliminary Design of m + m - Higgs Factory Machine-Detector Interface

WHAT CAN THE SSC AND THE VLHC STUDIES TELL US FOR THE HE-LHC?

Overview of LHC Accelerator

Results on a-c tubes subjected to synchrotron irradiation

Impact of the forces due to CLIQ discharges on the MQXF Beam Screen. Marco Morrone, Cedric Garion TE-VSC-DLM

The Large Hadron Collider Lyndon Evans CERN

Much of this material comes from lectures given by Philippe Lebrun (head of CERN's Accelerator Technology Department), at SUSSP, Aug

HE II HEAT EXCHANGER TEST UNIT FOR THE LHC INNER TRIPLET

Accelerator development

Alignment in Circular Colliders and Specific Requirements for LHC

DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION OF SUPERCONDUCTING AND CRYOGENIC EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS FOR ACCELERATORS BY IHEP

Experience from the LEP Vacuum System

Very Large Hadron Collider Beam Screen Design. Preliminary Investigation of Space Requirements

Optimization of the SIS100 Lattice and a Dedicated Collimation System for Ionisation Losses

The LHC Collider. STOA lecture, Brussels, 27 th November 2012 Steve Myers Director of Accelerators and Technology, CERN

Experimental Results of a LHC Type Cryogenic Vacuum System Subjected to an Electron Cloud

LHC Status and CERN s future plans. Lyn Evans

RING-RING DESIGN. Miriam Fitterer, CERN - KIT for the LHeC study group

Thermal Field in a NMR Cryostat. Annunziata D Orazio Agostini Chiara Simone Fiacco

LHC operation in 2015 and prospects for the future

IR status. 2009/3/19 M. Iwasaki For Super-KEKB MDI group U. Tokyo, Tohoku U., and KEK

Superconduttivita e Criogenia

USING TEVATRON MAGNETS FOR HE-LHC OR NEW RING IN LHC TUNNEL*

Why are particle accelerators so inefficient?

Compressor Ring. Contents Where do we go? Beam physics limitations Possible Compressor ring choices Conclusions. Valeri Lebedev.

2008 JINST 3 S Main machine layout and performance. Chapter Performance goals

Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung mbh (GSI), Planckstrasse 1, D Darmstadt, Germany

The LHC: the energy, cooling, and operation. Susmita Jyotishmati

1.1 Machine-Detector Interface

Longitudinal Dynamics

Beam induced heat loads on the beam-screens of the twin-bore magnets in the IRs of the HL-LHC

Analysis of Coupled Electromagnetic-Thermal Effects in Superconducting Accelerator Magnets

Innovative fabrication method of superconducting magnets using high T c superconductors with joints

R&D ON FUTURE CIRCULAR COLLIDERS

The High-Power-Target System of a Muon Collider or Neutrino Factory

A Very Large Lepton Collider in a VLHC tunnel

Physics at Accelerators

Superconducting Magnets for Future Electron-Ion Collider. Yuhong Zhang Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, USA

SC magnets for Future HEHIHB Colliders

A SIMULATION STUDY OF THE ELECTRON CLOUD IN THE EXPERIMENTAL REGIONS OF LHC

Theory English (Official)

(a) (b) Fig. 1 - The LEP/LHC tunnel map and (b) the CERN accelerator system.

Introduction to particle accelerators

2.6 Electron transport lines

LHC status & 2009/2010 operations. Mike Lamont

Colliders and the Machine Detector Interface

Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

Overview of HEMC Scheme

HL LHC: impedance considerations for the new triplet layout in IR1 & 5

OVERVIEW OF THE LHEC DESIGN STUDY AT CERN

Study of Distributed Ion-Pumps in CESR 1

Fundamentals of Accelerators

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Local Power Distribution from Particle Losses. in the LHC Inner Triplet Magnet Q1. A. Morsch. CERN LIBRHRIES. sawzvq

MAGNET INSTALLATION AND ALIGNMENT FOR THE FUJI TEST BEAM LINE AT KEKB

Principles of Food and Bioprocess Engineering (FS 231) Problems on Heat Transfer

Vacuum System of Synchrotron radiation sources

Luminosity for the 100 TeV collider

LHC. Construction Understanding first the commissioning. Prospects for

Helium two-phase flow in a thermosiphon open loop

CRYOGENIC CONDUCTION COOLING TEST OF REMOVABLE PANEL MOCK-UP FOR ITER CRYOSTAT THERMAL SHIELD

The Very Large Hadron Collider Beam Collimation System

5CM, NO IRON SSC DIPOLE 12M MODEL CRYOSTAT THERMAL PERFORMANCE* R. J. Powers, J. D. Gonczy, J. Otavka, R. C. Niemann, A. Szymulanski, and J. L.

Cryogenic and Electrical Test Results of a 30 M HTS Power Cable

LHC accelerator status and prospects. Frédérick Bordry Higgs Hunting nd September Paris

Beam heat load due to geometrical and resistive wall impedance in COLDDIAG

LEP 2 Energy Calibration and the Spectrometer

General Considerations

Monte Carlo Simulations of Synchrotron Radiation and Vacuum Performance of the MAX IV Light Sources

Introduction to Accelerators. Scientific Tools for High Energy Physics and Synchrotron Radiation Research

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

Examination Heat Transfer

CURRENT LEADS FOR THE LHC MAGNET SYSTEM

100 TeV Collider Magnets

3.2.2 Magnets. The properties of the quadrupoles, sextupoles and correctors are listed in tables t322_b,_c and _d.

PUBLICATION. Thermal Design of an Nb3Sn High Field Accelerator Magnet

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

Beam-induced heat loads on the beam screens of the inner triplets for the HL-LHC

LHC Upgrade Plan and Ideas - scenarios & constraints from the machine side

Superconducting RF Accelerators: Why all the interest?

Luminosity Considerations for erhic

ThomX Machine Advisory Committee. (LAL Orsay, March ) Ring Beam Dynamics

Review of proposals of ERL injector cryomodules. S. Belomestnykh

Transcription:

Very Large Hadron Collider - phase 2 Optimization of the beam screen cooling & Impact of the photon stop on the cryogenic system VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum Saturday June 23, 21 - Christine Darve & Pierre Bauer

Headlines Specification and Model for the beam screen cooling Influence of the synchrotron radiation Heat flux equations Cooling loop optimization Configuration @ RT Design of the beam screen Impact of the photon-stop on the cryogenic system CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 2

Specification Extract the beam-induced heating: Synchrotron radiation, resistive wall and multipacting heat loads Tolerant of vacuum, irradiation and cryogenic environments, Allow the gas-load to be cryopumped by the cold bore, Limit the photodesorption, The design must be cost effective (minimize the total refrigeration cost). CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 3

Space requirement CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 4

Space requirement Cold bore Cooling surface < 28% x Cold bore X-sectional area D 32.5 mm D 2 mm D2< Available cooling space <D32.5 CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 5

Cooling System - Schematic S by Tom Peterson Tom Peterson 19 March 21 High Field VLHC cell flow concept with S. Zlobin electrical scheme Dipole bus and coil leads Focussing quad bus and coil leads Defocussing quad bus and coil leads 6 IPS (17 cm) pipe 3 K, 1.2 bar helium gas return 4.5 K, 4 bar magnet helium flow One 27 meter cell Relief and cooldown valve D D C C C D dq Spool D D D D D D D fq Large D D D D D D D dq Spool Spool Magnet cryostat Transfer line 9 K to 11 K beam screens 8 K to 9 K thermal shield Jumper connections (Include vacuum breaks) 1.5 inch (3.8 cm) tube 36 inch (92 cm) magnet cryostat vacuum shell 26 inch (66 cm) OD transfer line vacuum shell Pipe includes 4.5 K, 4 bar helium flow parallel to magnet flow Four 25 ka bus in 4 IPS (11 cm) helium pipe Shield and beam screen flow valve 4 IPS (11 cm) pipe 5.5 K, 1.8 bar helium return and quench header 5 IPS (14 cm) pipe 8 K, 2 bar helium thermal shield supply and beam screen supply 6 IPS (17 cm) pipe 11 K, 17 bar helium shield return flow and transfer line shield Quench and cooldown valve CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 6

Cooling System Parameters that influence the refrigeration cost: Limits: Luminosity Synchrotron radiation Cell length Inlet temperature of the beam screen Cooling X-section area Mass flow: Pressure drop Cross-sectional area of the cooling channel < 28 % of the cold bore one Temperature gradients Output: Optimal temperature of the thermal shield Optimal temperature of the beam screen Different wall plug powers CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 7

Definition of parameters Symb Definition Unit Value ol T bs Beam screen average temperature K T ts +DT bs /2+DT ts /2 T cb Cold bore temperature K 5 d cb Cold bore inner diameter mm 34 d bs Beam screen outer diameter mm 32.5 g Thermal conductance coefficients (*) W/m/K 2.32 3.11-6 h Efficiency.3 ess Emissivity of stainless steel surfaces.1 @ 4 K.2 @ 3 K eal Emissivity of aluminum surfaces.4 @ 4 K.15 @ 3 K s Stefan-Boltzmann constant Watt/m 2 /K 4 5.67 1-8 DT BS Allowable temperature gradient in the K 2 beam screen cooling pipe DT TS Allowable temperature gradient in the K 5 thermal shield cooling pipe m Cryogen mass-flow g/s TBD L Cell length m TBD (135) N Number of cooling tube TBD CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 8

Model for the beam screen cooling L is the beam screen cooling loop length (equal to n x 135 meters by default ) Cooling tube th=.5 mm L Beam screen th=1 mm Qs Qc ( T ) = Po P ( T T ) P, bs bs cb bs cb P bs R SS R He T bs T ct T P He CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 9

From Pierre Bauer CHRONOLOGY psr (W/m/beam) 1 1 1.1.1.1 electrons protons TEV LEP HERA APS LHC 197 198 199 2 21 22 23 year VLHC1 VLHC2 The VLHC2 would be the first SR dominated cryogenic collider. Accelerator & Technology Seminar Fermilab, June 12, 21 13 P. Bauer Synchrotron Radiation and Vacuum issues in the VLHC2 CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 1

p P SR peak SR (W/m/beam) Accelerator & Technology Seminar Fermilab, June 12, 21 From Pierre Bauer = SR POWER LAW 4 2 EfN p γ m pc 4πrp fnb N W γ = 2πρ 2 6πρ m ρ 7 6-7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 25 4 55 5-6 r fixed at 29.9 km 4-5 3-4 2-3VLHC2* 1-2 -1 7 g 85 1 12 115 13 P. Bauer Synchrotron Radiation and Vacuum issues in the VLHC2 CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 11 * 5 times more than in LHC! 145 1 ini pb 6 4 Ib 2 4.7 W/m/beam I b (ma)

Influence of the synchrotron radiation New parameters Previous parameters Energy per proton E b (TeV) 87.5 87.5 Peak Luminosity L (cm -2 s -1 ) 2 1 34 2 1 34 Total Circumference C (km) 233 241 Bending radius r (km) 29.9 29.1 Dipole Field B (T) 9.7 1 Circumference Arc l arc (km) 22 22 Magnet packing factor (%) 85.5 85 Number of Bunches N b 37,152 81,16 Initial Nr. of Protons per Bunch N p/b 7.5 1 9 6.2 1 9 Bunch Spacing (ns) 18.8 9 Revolution frequency f (Hz) 1,286 1,242 Rms bunch length (cm) 3.3 3.3 Number of IP s 2 2 Beta* (cm) 71 25 Luminosity life-time (collision loss only) t L (hours) 9.8 9.8 Gamma g 93,284 93,284 Beam Current I b (ma) 57.4 11 Radiation damping time t R (hours) 2.5 2.5 SR heat load vs. Luminosity for one beam 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 p peak SR = 4 2 ini pb EfN p γ m pc 4πrp fnbn W γ = 2πρ 2 6πρ m ρ 4 Ib 2 1E+34 3E+34 5E+34 7E+34 9E+34 Luminosity (cm -2 s -1 ) CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 12

Heat flux equations f (T ) = 1 T η TR T η =.3 ptot = pbs (Tbs ) f (T ) + pcb (Tbs ) f (Tcb ) CARNOT EFFICIENCY dptot (Tbs ) = dt 1 2 @ 5 K 1 7 @ 97 K 1 1 5 1 15 2 TEMPERATURE (K) CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 13

Heat flux equations Heat load to the cold bore (Pcb( Pcb) p cb ( ) ( 2.34 2.34 ) ( 4 4 T = C T T + C σ T T ) bs 1 bs cb 2 bs cb C1 = 3.1 1 6 watt m K 2.32 Ref: LHC-PROJECT-NOTE-2 - Heat Flow Measurements on Beam Screens with and without Supports.125 W/m for Tbs=97 K C2 = σ 4 4 ( T bs T cb ) π d bs 1 εst( T bs d + ) d P cb (T bs )<.15 W/m bs cb 1 1 εst( T cb 1 ) heat transfer (W/m) 1.1.1.32 W/m for Tbs=97 K 1 Radiation Conduction Total 5 1 15 2 25 3 beam-screen temp (K) CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 14

Calculation of beam screen parameters Q s = S ll T bs T m=6.6 g/s ct k SS ( T ) Cooling surf=9% Tct=96.45 K Tbsout=15.97K dt QsT ( ) QcTfT (, ) Pbs phemdottout (,, Tin) 2 15 1 5 Q c = N A L ct h ( T )( T ) ct T ( T ) k ( T ) h = Nu d ct Nu =.23Re Pr = µ Re = ρ v ( T ) = ( T ) A ct c ( T ) k m& ρ.8 ( T ) ( T ) p d v µ ct Pr ( T ) ( T ) N.4 95 95.5 96 96.5 97 T bs ( T ) = Po P ( T T ) P, bs cb bs cb p He = dm dt c p 1 ( T )( Tout Tin ) L CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 15

Ptsrad ( Tts) = Heat flux to the thermal shield α P ts ( Tts) = Ptsrad ( Tts) + Ptscond ( Tts) 2 ( Tvv Tts 2 N 2 ) + β ( Tvv 4 Tts N 4 ) Per ts Perimeter of the thermal shield a,b are coefficients taking into account the thermal conductivity of the superinsulation system and the emissivity factor of superinsulation, respectively. Both coefficients are deduced from the type of superinsulation and the residual gas pressure in the vacuum vessel. Ptscond ( Tts) = 5 2 ( 7 1.6 Tts + 8.19) 1 Ptsrad(65K) = 2.8 W/m Ptscond(65K) = 1.4 W/m CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 16

Cooling loop:thermal shield and Beam screen in series ( T ) = f ( T ) P ( T ) + f ( T ) [ 2 P ( T )] + f ( T ) [ 2 P ( T, T ) 1] P2 Q ts ts ts ts bs bs bs cb cb bs cb + We estimate that.5 W/m is the additional heat load, Q1, on the two cold bores due to resistive heating in the magnet, beam gas scattering, radiation from the shield, conduction through the cold mass supports. Power at the plug (W) 5 4 3 2 1 Optimization refrigeration cost for PSR=5 W/m ~ 1% of economy for Tbs @ 97 K compared to Tbs @76 K optimum BS temp (K) 12 1 8 6 4 2 5 4 3 2 1 5 1 15 2 synchrotron rad power (W/m/beam) cooling surface (mm 2 ) 5 1 15 2 Beam screen temperature (K) Installed Power 1.4 MW CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 17

Cooling loop optimization Optimal beam screen temperature (K) 13 12 11 1 9 8 7 5 1 15 2 PSR (W/m) Optimal beam screen temperature (average) for a beam screen in series with the thermal shield Optimal thermal shield temperature (Calculated independently from the beam screen cooling system) Operating wall power plug (W/m) - No beam screen in series 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 2 6 1 14 Thermal shield temperature (K) CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 18

Cooling loop optimization Parameters calculated for a luminosity of 2.1 34 34 cm -1.s -1-1, with 4.7 W/m of SR power: 1- the optimal beam screen temperature if in series w/ thermal shield T1_BS opt = 97 K 2- the optimal thermal shield temperature if in series w/ beam screen T1_TS opt = 83 K 3- the optimal thermal shield temperature w/o beam screen T_TS opt = 63 K 4- the one beam screen + one cold bore operating wall plug power Ptotbs(82.7K) = 64.8 W/m 5- the thermal shield (only) operating wall plug power PtsRT(82.7K) =37.1 W/m CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 19

Cooling loop optimization Parameters calculated for a luminosity of 2.1 34 34 cm -1.s -1-1, with 4.7 W/m of SR power: 6- the beam screen + cold bore operating wall plug power PtotRT(97K) =224.6 W/m 7- the thermal shield + cold mass operating wall plug power PtsRT(82.7K) = 197 W/m 8- the VLHC total operating wall plug power PRT_BScold = 61.8 MW 9- the VLHC total operating wall plug power w/ the safety and overcapacity factor Power_BScold = 1.4 MW CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 2

Ref: Fermilab-TM-2149 Design Study for a Staged VLHC Shield supply Shield return pipe pipe Thermal shield Beam screen and thermal shield Magnet cold mass (in transfer line) (magnet) (two beams) (transfer line) Temp in (K) 77. 77.61 87.58 77.61 4.5 Press in (bar) 2. 19.4 19.3 18.1 4. Temp out (K) 77.61 87.58 16.58 18.82 5.5 Press out (bar) 19.4 19.3 18.1 17.7 1.8 Predicted heat load (W/m).1 4.2 1. 2.2.83 Heat uncertainty factor 1.25 1.25 1. 1.25 1.25 Design heat load (W/m).13 5.25 1. 2.75 1.4 Distance (m) 97. 97. 7824. 97. 97. Design total heat (kw) 1.2 5.9 78.2 26.7 1.1 Design mass flow (g/s) 114. 13.6 6.8 114. 422.7 Design ideal power (kw) 1.4 137.5 194.5 63. 647.3 4.5 K equiv design power (kw).2 2.1 3. 1. 9.9 Efficiency (fraction Carnot).3.3.3.3.3 Efficiency in Watts/Watt (W/W) 28.7 9. 8.3 7.9 214.4 Nominal operating power (kw) 34.8 458.2 648.5 21.1 2157.6 Overcapacity factor 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Installed operating power (kw) 45.2 595.7 843. 273.1 284.8 Percent of power 1.% 12.6% 17.9% 5.8% 59.4% Total installed operating power for one 1 km string (MW) 4.7 Total installed 4.5 K equivalent power for one 1 km string (kw) 21.2 Number of above "strings" in accelerator 24 Operating wall plug power for cryogenics for entire accelerator (MW) 85.7 Installed wall plug power for cryogenics for entire accelerator (MW) 113.3 Installed 4.5 K equivalent power for entire accelerator (kw) 58.9 Installed number of LHC system equivalents 3.5 From Tom Peterson CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 21

Configuration @ RT Solution: 2 g/s of water to keep a 2 K gradient along the beam screen DP= 1 bar thermal shield around the beam screen If the thermal shield is cooled in series w/ the cold mass then Tts=95 K X-section water + X-section He = 22 % + 12% >28 % available for the 4 aperture magnets Save 27 % of the refrigeration cost Installed Power 76.1 MW Need to increase the aperture of the magnet ==> not a realistic solution CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 22

Configuration @ RT 5 1 K beam screen Total refrigeration power (W/m) 4 3 2 1 3 K beam screen Plots for P SR = 8.5 W/m 5 1 15 2 Temperature of the thermal shield (K) Save 27 % of the refrigeration cost Installed Power 76.1 MW Need to increase the aperture of the magnet ==> not a realistic solution CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 23

Beam screen design Cold bore updated dimensions: 5/53 mm LHC beam screen Operating temperature : 5 K to 2 K Cooling tube: ID=3.7 mm,.53 mm thick, developed with high manganese and high nitrogen content stainless steel grade (commercial name Boehler P56). This steel grade needs a magnetic permeability of < 1.5 at temperatures of 5-2 K Preliminary VLHC beam screen proposal 8 tubes (3.7 mm id / 4.5 mm od), screen (44 mm id / 46 mm od) and cold bore (49 mm id / 52 mm od); CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 24

VLHC2-BS 6W/m-12% DESIGN Beam-screen: 32.5 mm OD 1mm SS.5 mm brass/ss supports Extruded SS cooling channel (.5 mm wall thickness) Aperture: 2x3 mm 2µm Cu layer - co-laminated 9-11 K*, 19-18 bar* 6.6 g/sec GHe 12 pump. slots/m 1.5x8mm-rounded Accelerator & Technology Seminar Fermilab, June 12, 21 18 K. Ewald 1.5 mm cold-bore, 34 mm ID P. Bauer Synchrotron Radiation and Vacuum issues in the VLHC2 * refers CD - June to 23, a 135 21 m half-cell VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 25

ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS From Pierre Bauer 14 GHe CB wall Power per beam (W/m) 12 1 8 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 GHe H 2 O BS CB BS BSTS PS C. Darve synchrotron rad power (W/m/beam) CB Accelerator & Technology Seminar Fermilab, June 12, 21 22 P. Bauer Synchrotron Radiation and Vacuum issues in the VLHC2 CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 26

Acknowledgement - Tom Peterson - Berthold Jenninger - Nicolaas Kos - Tom Nicol CD - June 23, 21 VLHC workshop on the beam tube vacuum 27