Foundations for the New Keynesian Model. Lawrence J. Christiano

Similar documents
Foundations for the New Keynesian Model. Lawrence J. Christiano

Simple New Keynesian Model without Capital. Lawrence J. Christiano

Simple New Keynesian Model without Capital

Simple New Keynesian Model without Capital

Simple New Keynesian Model without Capital

Equilibrium Conditions for the Simple New Keynesian Model

The Basic New Keynesian Model, the Labor Market and Sticky Wages

The Labor Market in the New Keynesian Model: Incorporating a Simple DMP Version of the Labor Market and Rediscovering the Shimer Puzzle

Optimal Simple And Implementable Monetary and Fiscal Rules

The Labor Market in the New Keynesian Model: Foundations of the Sticky Wage Approach and a Critical Commentary

Deviant Behavior in Monetary Economics

Monetary Economics. Lecture 15: unemployment in the new Keynesian model, part one. Chris Edmond. 2nd Semester 2014

Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models. December 4, 2007

Problem 1 (30 points)

Lecture 2 The Centralized Economy

A Modern Equilibrium Model. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde University of Pennsylvania

The Basic New Keynesian Model. Jordi Galí. June 2008

ADVANCED MACROECONOMICS I

Advanced Macroeconomics II. Monetary Models with Nominal Rigidities. Jordi Galí Universitat Pompeu Fabra April 2018

Advanced Macroeconomics

Gali (2008), Chapter 3

Macroeconomic Theory and Analysis Suggested Solution for Midterm 1

Monetary Economics: Solutions Problem Set 1

The Basic New Keynesian Model. Jordi Galí. November 2010

The New Keynesian Model: Introduction

Neoclassical Business Cycle Model

Lecture 3, November 30: The Basic New Keynesian Model (Galí, Chapter 3)

WORKING PAPER NO INTEREST RATE VERSUS MONEY SUPPLY INSTRUMENTS: ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MARKOV-PERFECT OPTIMAL MONETARY POLICY

Stagnation Traps. Gianluca Benigno and Luca Fornaro

Equilibrium in a Production Economy

New Keynesian DSGE Models: Building Blocks

DSGE-Models. Calibration and Introduction to Dynare. Institute of Econometrics and Economic Statistics

(a) Write down the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Equation in the dynamic programming

Macroeconomics Theory II

Lecture 6, January 7 and 15: Sticky Wages and Prices (Galí, Chapter 6)

Session 4: Money. Jean Imbs. November 2010

Getting to page 31 in Galí (2008)

The New Keynesian Model

Macroeconomics Theory II

Permanent Income Hypothesis Intro to the Ramsey Model

Monetary Policy and Unemployment: A New Keynesian Perspective

Imperfect Information and Optimal Monetary Policy

Part A: Answer question A1 (required), plus either question A2 or A3.

Topic 8: Optimal Investment

Inference. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde University of Pennsylvania

Toulouse School of Economics, M2 Macroeconomics 1 Professor Franck Portier. Exam Solution

Financial Factors in Economic Fluctuations. Lawrence Christiano Roberto Motto Massimo Rostagno

SGZ Macro Week 3, Lecture 2: Suboptimal Equilibria. SGZ 2008 Macro Week 3, Day 1 Lecture 2

1. Constant-elasticity-of-substitution (CES) or Dixit-Stiglitz aggregators. Consider the following function J: J(x) = a(j)x(j) ρ dj

New Keynesian Model Walsh Chapter 8

Advanced Macroeconomics

problem. max Both k (0) and h (0) are given at time 0. (a) Write down the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Equation in the dynamic programming

Toulouse School of Economics, Macroeconomics II Franck Portier. Homework 1. Problem I An AD-AS Model

Monetary Policy Design in the Basic New Keynesian Model. Jordi Galí. October 2015

Fiscal Multipliers in a Nonlinear World

Macroeconomic Theory and Analysis V Suggested Solutions for the First Midterm. max

Resolving the Missing Deflation Puzzle. June 7, 2018

Graduate Macro Theory II: Business Cycle Accounting and Wedges

Monetary Economics Notes

Demand Shocks with Dispersed Information

Equilibrium Conditions and Algorithm for Numerical Solution of Kaplan, Moll and Violante (2017) HANK Model.

Foundation of (virtually) all DSGE models (e.g., RBC model) is Solow growth model

The Smets-Wouters Model

Government The government faces an exogenous sequence {g t } t=0

Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Volatility in a Small Open Economy. Jordi Galí and Tommaso Monacelli. March 2005

Demand Shocks, Monetary Policy, and the Optimal Use of Dispersed Information

Topic 9. Monetary policy. Notes.

Fluctuations. Shocks, Uncertainty, and the Consumption/Saving Choice

The Natural Rate of Interest and its Usefulness for Monetary Policy

MAGYAR NEMZETI BANK MINI-COURSE

Signaling Effects of Monetary Policy

Modelling Czech and Slovak labour markets: A DSGE model with labour frictions

Schumpeterian Growth Models

Public Economics The Macroeconomic Perspective Chapter 2: The Ramsey Model. Burkhard Heer University of Augsburg, Germany

Chapter 7. Endogenous Growth II: R&D and Technological Change

Competitive Equilibrium and the Welfare Theorems

Topic 2. Consumption/Saving and Productivity shocks

Optimal Inflation Stabilization in a Medium-Scale Macroeconomic Model

Monetary Policy and Unemployment: A New Keynesian Perspective

Practice Questions for Mid-Term I. Question 1: Consider the Cobb-Douglas production function in intensive form:

MA Advanced Macroeconomics: 7. The Real Business Cycle Model

Solutions to Problem Set 4 Macro II (14.452)

u(c t, x t+1 ) = c α t + x α t+1

Online Appendix for Investment Hangover and the Great Recession

Economic Growth: Lecture 9, Neoclassical Endogenous Growth

The Real Business Cycle Model

Nonlinearity. Exploring this idea and what to do about it requires solving a non linear model.

Macroeconomics I. University of Tokyo. Lecture 12. The Neo-Classical Growth Model: Prelude to LS Chapter 11.

Lecture notes on modern growth theory

Structural change in a multi-sector model of the climate and the economy

Assumption 5. The technology is represented by a production function, F : R 3 + R +, F (K t, N t, A t )

"0". Doing the stuff on SVARs from the February 28 slides

Economic transition following an emission tax in a RBC model with endogenous growth. EC-IILS JOINT DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES No. 17

Macroeconomics Theory II

Expanding Variety Models

Lecture 15. Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model. Randall Romero Aguilar, PhD I Semestre 2017 Last updated: July 3, 2017

The Ramsey Model. (Lecture Note, Advanced Macroeconomics, Thomas Steger, SS 2013)

The TransPacific agreement A good thing for VietNam?

Gold Rush Fever in Business Cycles

Advanced Macroeconomics II. Real Business Cycle Models. Jordi Galí. Universitat Pompeu Fabra Spring 2018

Transcription:

Foundations for the New Keynesian Model Lawrence J. Christiano

Objective Describe a very simple model economy with no monetary frictions. Describe its properties. markets work well Modify the model dlto include price setting frictions. Now markets won t necessarily work so well, unless monetary policy is good.

Model Household preferences: E 0 t0 t logc t exp t N t, t t t, t ~iidn0, 2

Production Final output requires lots of intermediate inputs: Y t Yi,t 0 Production of intermediate inputs: di, Y a t a a ~iidn0, 2 i,t e N i,t, Δa t Δa t t, t a Constraint on allocation of labor: N it di N t 0

Efficient Allocation of Total Labor Suppose total labor,, is fixed. N t What is the best way to allocate N t among the various activities, 0 i? Answer: allocate labor equally across all the activities N it N t, all i

Suppose Labor Not Allocated Equally Example: N it 2N t i 0, 2 2 N t i,,0. 2 Note that this is a particular distribution of labor across activities: N di 2N it t 2 N N 2 2 t t 0

Labor Not Allocated Equally, cnt d Y t Y i,t 0 di 0 2 Y i,t e a t 0 2 di N i,t Yi,t 2 di 2 di Ni,t di e a 2 t 2N t di 0 2 Nt 2 e a t N t 0 2 2 di 2 2 a t e N t 2 2 2 2 di di e a t N t f

f 2 2 2 2 Efficient Resource Allocation Means Equal Labor Across All Sectors 0 0.98 0.96 0.94 f 0.92 0.9 6 0.88 0. 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 α

Economy with Efficient N Allocation Efficiency dictates N it N t all i So, with efficient production: Y a t e t N t Resource constraint: Preferences: C t Y t E 0 t0 N t logc t t exp t, ~iid, t t, t

Efficient Determination of Labor Lagrangian: max E 0 C t,n t t0 t logc t exp t N t uc t,n t, t t e a t N t C t First order conditions: or: u c C t,n t, t t, u n C t,n t, t t e a t 0 marginal cost of labor in consumption units u n,t u c,t a t u n,t u c,t e 0 du dnt du dct dc t dnt marginal product of labor e a t

Efficient Determination of Labor, cont d Solving the fonc s: u n,t u c,t e a t C t exp t N e a t t e a t N t exp t N t e a t N t exp t Note: C t exp a t t Labor responds to preference shock, not to tech shock

Response to a Jump in a consumption Higher a Indifference curve Budget constraint Leisure, -N

Decentralizing the Model Give households budget constraints and place them in markets. Give the production functions to firms and suppose that they seek to maximize i profits.

Solve: Subject to: Households t N t maxe 0 logc t exp t, t0 bonds purchases in t wage rate profits (real) interest on bonds C t B t w t N t t r t B t First order conditions: u n,t u c,t C t exp t N t w t marginal cost of working equals marginal benefit u c,t E t u c,t r t marginal cost of saving equals marginal benefit

Final Good Firms Final good firms buy Y i,t, i 0,, at given prices,, to maximize profits: P i,t Y t P i,t Y i,t di 0 Subject to Y t Yi,t 0 di Fonc s: P i,t Y t Y i,t Y i,t P i,t Y t, Pi,t di 0

Intermediate Good Firms Y i,t For each there is a single producer who is a monopolist in the product market and hires labor, in competitive labor markets. N i,t Marginal cost of production: (real) marginal costs t dcost dwor ker doutput dwor ker subsidy payment to firm expa t wt t Subsidy will be required to ensure markets work efficiently.

Intermediate Good Firms Demand curve P i,t Y i,t P i,t Y t Marginal cost, s t Marginal revenue Y i,t

ith Intermediate Good Firm Problem: max Nit P it Y it s t Y it Subject to demand for : Problem: max N it Y i,t Y i,t P i,t Y t P it P i,t Y t s t P i,t Y t fonc : P it Y t s t P i,t Y t 0 P it s t price is markup over marginal cost Note: all prices are the same, so resources allocated efficiently across intermediate good firms. P i,t P j,t, because Pi,t di 0

Equilibrium Pulling things together: w s t t expa t household fonc if u n,t u c,t expa t. u n,t u c,t expa t If proper subsidy is provided to monopolists, employment is efficient: if, then u n,t u c,t expa t

Equilibrium Allocations With efficient subsidy, u n,t u c,t functional form Ct exp t N t resource constraint expat exp t N t expa t N t exp t t C a t t e N t exp ep a t Bond marketclearing implies: B t 0 always

Interest Rate in Equilibrium Interest rate backed out of household intertemporal Euler equation: u c,t E t u c,t r t C E t r t C t t r t C E t t E t expc t c t C t E t exp a t a t t t exp E Δa t t, V t 2 a ep t a t V 2 2 2 logr t log E t c t c t Δa t t t 2 V

Dynamic Properties of the Model Response to.0 Technology Shock in Period x 0-3 Response to.0 Preference Shock in Period 0.04-0.5 0.035-0.03 -.5 log C t 0.025 0.02 0.05 0.0 (a t - a t- ) = 0.75(a t- - a t-2 ) + epsa t log C t -2-2.5-3 -3.5-4 τ t = 0.5τ t- + epstau t 0.005-4.5 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 20 22 24 t -5 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 20 22 24 t interest rate x 0-3 interest rate r t log, r 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.0 0.0 0.009 log r t = -logβ + 0.75a t- 9 t t- r t log, r 9.5 8.5 8 log r t = -logβ - (0.5 - )τ t /( + ) 0.008 7.5 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 20 22 24 t 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 20 22 24 t

Key Features of Equilibrium Allocations Allocations efficient (as long as monopoly power neutralized) Employment does not respond to technology Improvement in technology raises marginal product of labor and marginal cost of labor by same amount. First best consumption not a function of intertemporal considerations Discount rate irrelevant. Anticipated future values of shocks irrelevant. Natural rate of interest steers consumption and p employment towards their natural levels.

Introducing Price Setting Frictions (Clarida Gali Gertler Gertler Model) Households maximize: E 0 t0 Subject to: logc t exp t N t, t t t, t ~iid, P t C t B t W t N t R t B t T t Intratemporal first order condition: C N W t C t exp t N t W t P t

Household Intertemporal FONC Condition: or E t u c,t u c,t R t t C t E R t t C t t E t explogr t log t Δc t explogr t E t t E t Δc t, c t logc t take log of both sides: or 0 log r t E t t E t Δc t, r t logr t or c t log r t E t t c t

Final Good Firms Buy at prices and sell for Y i,t, i 0, P i,t Y t P t Take all prices as given (competitive) Profits: Production function: P t Y t P i,t Y i,t di 0 Y t Yi,t 0 di,, First order condition: Y i,t Y t P i,t P t P t Pi,t di 0

Intermediate Good Firms Each ith good produced by a single monopoly producer. Demand curve: Technology: Y i,t Y t P i,t P t Calvo Price setting Friction Y i,t expa t N i,t, Δa t Δa t t a, P i,t P t P i,t with probability with probability,

Marginal Cost real marginal cost s t dcost dwor ker doutput dwor ker W t/p t expa t in efficient setting C t exp t N t expa t

The Intermediate Firm s Decisions ith firm is required to satisfy whatever demand shows up at its posted price. It s only real decision is to adjust price whenever the opportunity arises.

Intermediate Good Firm Present tdiscounted d value of firm profits: period tj profits sent to household E t j0 j marginal value of dividends to householdu c,tj /P tj tj revenues P i,tj Y i,tj totalt cost P tj s tj Y i,tj Each of the firms that can optimize price choose P to optimize P t in selecting price, firm only cares about future states in which it can t reoptimize E t j j tj P ty t i,tj P tj s tj Y i,tj. j0

Intermediate Good Firm Problem Substitute t out the demand dcurve: E t j tj P ty i,tj P tj s tj Y i,tj j0 j0 E t j tj Y tj P tj P t P tj s tj P t. Differentiate with respect to : or E t j0 j tj Y tj P tj P t P tj s tj P t 0, j P t E t tj Y tj P tj s Ptj tj 0. j0 P t

Intermediate Good Firm Problem Objective: E t j u C tj Y tj P P t tj s tj 0. P tj P tj j0 or j P t E t P tj Ptj s tj 0. j0 E t j0 j X t,j p tx t,j s tj 0, p t P t, X P t,j t tj tj t, j tj tj t, j 0., X t,j X t,j, j 0 t

Intermediate Good Firm Problem Want p t in: E t j0 j X t,j p tx t,j s tj 0 Solution: p t E t j0 j X t,j E t j X t,j j0 s tj K t F t But, still need expressions for K t, F t.

K t E t j X t,j j00 s tj s t E t j X t,j t j t s tj s t E t j X t,j s tj t t j0 E t by LIME s t E t E t t j X t,j s tj j0 exactly K t! s t E t t E t j X t,j j0 0 s tj s t E t t Kt

From previous slide: Kt K t s t E t K t. t Substituting out for marginal cost: dcost/dlabor s t W t /P t doutput/dlabor expa t W t Pt by household optimization exp t N t C t expa t.

In Sum solution: Where: p t E t j0 j X t,j E t j0 j X t,j s tj K t, F t F t K t t exp t N t C t expa t E t t Kt. F F j t E t X t,j E t F t t j0

To Characterize Equilibrium Have equations characterizing optimization by firms and households. Still need: Expression for all the prices. Prices, P i,t,0 i, will all be different because of the price setting frictions. i Relationship between aggregate employment and aggregate output not simple becauseof price distortions: Y a t t e N t, in general This part of the analysis is the reason why it made Cl Calvo famous it s not easy.

Going for Prices Aggregate price relationship P t P i,t di 0 P di i,t firms that reoptimize price P i,t firms that don t reoptimize price di all reoptimizers choose same price P t P i,t di firms that don t reoptimize price In principle, to solve the model need all the prices, P t, P i,t,, 0 i Fortunately, that won t be necessary.

Key insight firms that don t reoptimize price in t P i,t di add over prices, weighted by # of firms posting that price number of firms thatt hd had price, P, in t and were not able to reoptimize i in t f t,t P d

Applying the Insight By Calvo randomization assumption total number of firms with price P in t f t,t f t, for all Substituting: P i,t di firms that don t reoptimize price f t,t P d f t P d P t Something hard got very simple!

p t Expression for in terms of aggregate inflation Conclude that this relationship holds between prices: P t P t P t. Only two variables here! Divide by P : P t Rearrange: p t t t p t t

Relation Between Aggregate Output and Aggregate Inputs Technically, there is no aggregate production function in this model If you know how many people are working, N, and the state of technology, a, you don t have enough information to know what Y is. Price frictions imply that resources will not be efficiently allocated among different inputs. Implies Y low for given a and N. How low? Tak Yun (JME) gave a simple answer.

Tak Yun Algebra Y t 0 Yi,t di 0 At N i,t di labor market clearing At N t demand curve Y P i,t Yt di 0 P t Y t P t Pi,t di 0 Calvo insight Y t P t P t Where: P t Pi,t 0 di P t P t

Relationship Between Agg Inputs and Agg Output Rewriting previous equation: Y t P t P t Yt p t e a t N t, efficiency distortion : p t : P i,t P j,t,, all i,j

Example of Efficiency Distortion P j,t P P 0 j 2 P 2 j. p P t t P P t 0.5, 0 P 2 P 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.95 0.94 093 0.93 - -0.5 0 0.5 logp /P 2

Collecting Equilibrium Conditions Price setting: K t exp t N t C t A t E t t K t () F t E t t F t (2) Intermediate good firm optimality and restriction across prices: p t by firm optimality Kt F t p t by restriction across prices t (3)

Equilibrium Conditions Law of motion of (Tak Yun) distortion: p t t t (4) p t Household IntertemporalCondition: E C t t C t R t t (5) Aggregate inputs and output: C t p t e a t N t (6) 6 equations, 8 unknowns:, C t, p t,nn t, t, K t, F t, R t System under determined!

Underdetermined System Not surprising: we added a variable, the nominal rate of interest. Also, we re counting subsidy as among the unknowns. Have two extra policy variables. One way to pin them down: compute optimal policy.

Ramsey Optimal Policy 6 equations in 8 unknowns.. Many configurations i of the 8 unknowns that satisfy the 6 equations. Look kfor the best configurations (Ramsey optimal) Value of tax subsidy and of R represent optimal policy Finding the Ramsey optimal setting of the 6 variables ibl involves solving li a simple Lagrangian optimization problem.

Ramsey Problem max E 0,p t,c t,n t,r t, t,f t,k t t0 0 t logc t exp t N t t E R t t Ct C t C t t C t 2t pt t t p t 3t E t t F t F t 4t C t exp t N t a t e 5t F t t Kt E t t K t K t 6t C t p t e a t N t

Solving the Ramsey Problem (surprisingly easy in this case) First, substitute out consumption everywhere defines R defines F defines tax defines K max E 0 t logn t logp exp t N t t,p t,n t,r t, t,f t,k t 0 t0 e t p E at R t t N t t e a t Nt p t 2t pt t t t p t 3t E t t F t F t 4t exp t N t p t E t t K t K t 5t F t t Kt

Solving the Ramsey Problem, cnt d Simplified problem: max E 0 t logn t logp exp t N t t t,p t,n t t0 2t pt t t p t First order conditions with respect to p t, t, N t p t 2,t t 2t, t p t p t, Nt exp t Substituting the solution for inflation into law of motion for price distortion: p t p t.

Solution to Ramsey Problem Eventually, price distortions eliminated, regardless of shocks p t When price distortions t p gone, so is inflation. t p t p t p t t N t exp Efficient ( first best ) allocations in real economy C t p t e a t N t. Consumption corresponds to efficient allocations in real economy, eventually when price distortions gone

Eventually, Optimal (Ramsey) Equilibrium and Efficient i Allocations in Real Economy Coincide id Convergence of price distortion 0.98 0.96 0.94 0.92 0.75, 0 r p-star 0.9 0.88 p t p t 0.86 0.84 0.82 0.8 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 20

The Ramsey allocations are eventually the best allocations in the economy without price frictions (i.e., first best allocations ) Rf Refer to the Ramsey allocations as the natural allocations. Natural consumption, natural rate of interest, etc.

Preceding provides important foundations for Preceding provides important foundations for the construction of the New Keynesian model.