The First Large Application of MPPC: T2K Neutrino Beam Monitor INGRID

Similar documents
The status of neutrino experiment WAGASCI

First neutrino beam and cosmic tracks. GDR neutrino

K2K and T2K experiments

SciBar and future K2K physics. F.Sánchez Universitat Aútonoma de Barcelona Institut de Física d'altes Energies

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

Baby MIND: A magnetised spectrometer for the WAGASCI experiment

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

PoS(KAON09)023. Beam Hole Photon Veto For J-PARC K O TO experiment. Yosuke Maeda Kyoto University

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

The Factors That Limit Time Resolution for Photon Detection in Large Cherenkov Detectors

Performance of the MCP-PMT for the Belle II TOP counter

PoS(ICHEP2016)474. SoLid: Search for Oscillations with a Lithium-6 Detector at the SCK CEN BR2 reactor

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)522. The status of MICE Step IV

PoS(HEP2005)177. Status of the OPERA experiment. Francesco Di Capua. Universita Federico II and INFN.

PoS(PD07)031. General performance of the IceCube detector and the calibration results

The Short Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab

Today: Part I: Neutrino oscillations: beam experiments. Part II: Next tutorials: making distributions with histograms and ntuples

Hands on Project: Large Photocathode PMT Characterization

PoS(TIPP2014)033. Upgrade of MEG Liquid Xenon Calorimeter. Ryu SAWADA. ICEPP, the University of Tokyo

The First Results of K2K long-baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

7th International Conference on New Developments In Photodetection

Design, construction, and initial performance of SciBar detector in K2K experiment

arxiv: v4 [physics.ins-det] 15 Jan 2018

T2K and the MAINZ Photon Beam

PoS(RPC2012)034. Simulation studies on the Effect of SF 6 in the RPC gas mixture

XMASS 1.5, the next step of the XMASS experiment

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

PoS(PhotoDet 2012)008

Analysis of muon and electron neutrino charged current interactions in the T2K near detectors

First Stage Analysis of the Energy Response and Resolution of the Scintillator ECAL in the Beam Test at FNAL, 2008

Results from T2K. Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K

Status of KEK-E391a and Future Prospects on K L π 0 νν at KEK. GeiYoub Lim IPNS, KEK

PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

Luminosity measurements and diffractive physics in ATLAS

MINOS. Physics Program and Construction Status. Karol Lang The University of Texas at Austin. YITP: Neutrinos and Implications for Physics Beyond

PoS(PD07)020. Timing Properties of MCP-PMT. Kenji Inami. Nagoya university, Nagoya, Japan

Characterisation of Silicon Photomultipliers for the T2K Experiment

Precision neutron flux measurement with a neutron beam monitor

PoS(TIPP2014)093. Performance study of the TOP counter with the 2 GeV/c positron beam at LEPS. K. Matsuoka, For the Belle II PID group

A test experiment to measure sub-gev flux in the on-axis direction at the J-PARC neutrino beam

A RICH Photon Detector Module with G-APDs

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

The T2K experiment Results and Perspectives. PPC2017 Corpus Christi Mai 2017 Michel Gonin On behalf of the T2K collaboration

Potential of Hyper-Kamiokande at some non-accelerator Physics and Nucleon Decay Searches

Recent Results from T2K and Future Prospects

First Stage Analysis of the Energy response and resolution of the Scintillator ECAL in the Beam Test at FNAL, 2008

The R&D study for the KLOD experiment. at IHEP (Protvino) U-70 proton

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)483. The CERN Neutrino Platform. Stefania Bordoni CERN

The T2K Neutrino Experiment

COMET muon conversion experiment in J-PARC

Construction of the CALICE High Granular Scintillator Based Electromagnetic Calorimeter Prototype and Its Response to Electrons

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 25 Aug 2015

FIRST NEUTRINO EVENTS IN THE OPERA EMULSION TARGET

PoS(DIS 2010)058. ATLAS Forward Detectors. Andrew Brandt University of Texas, Arlington

Application of GLoBES: GLACIER on conventional neutrino beams

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 8 Feb 2013

PoS(FPCP2017)024. The Hyper-Kamiokande Project. Justyna Lagoda

Water Cherenkov Detector installation by the Vertical Muon Equivalent technique

Status of Simulation Tools for ScECAL of ILD

MAGNET INSTALLATION AND ALIGNMENT FOR THE FUJI TEST BEAM LINE AT KEKB

XMASS: a large single-phase liquid-xenon detector

MEG II 実験の準備状況と 今後の展望 東京大学 素粒子物理国際研究センター 岩本敏幸 他MEG II コラボレーション 2018年9月14日 日本物理学会2018年秋季大会 信州大学 JSPS Core-to-Core Program

The HARP Experiment. G. Vidal-Sitjes (INFN-Ferrara) on behalf of the HARP Collaboration

THE AMS RICH COUNTER

PoS(Nufact08)003. Status and Prospects of Long Baseline ν Oscillation Experiments

Neutrino Cross Section Measurements for Long-Baseline Acceleratorbased Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

New Results from the MINOS Experiment

The Hyper-Kamiodande Project A New Adventure in n Physics

Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

Figure 1 Overview of the T2K experiment

Muon track reconstruction and veto performance with D-Egg sensor for IceCube-Gen2

Atmospheric Neutrinos MINOS MINOS Far Detector Type of Atmospheric Neutrinos at MINOS Two MINOS Atmospheric Analyses.


Emittance Measurement in the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment

NEUTRINOS II The Sequel

- ICARUS status and near future

ATLAS New Small Wheel Phase I Upgrade: Detector and Electronics Performance Analysis

NICA/MPD Electromagnetic Calorimeter based on Multipixel Avalanche Photodetector

Muon detector and muon flux measurement at Yangyang underground laboratory for the COSINE-100 experiment

Dark Noise Calibration of the Super-Kamiokande Outer Detector

Status Report: A Search for Sterile Neutrino at J-PARC MLF (E56, JSNS 2 )

Discovery of the Neutrino Mass-I. P1X* Frontiers of Physics Lectures October 2004 Dr Paul Soler University of Glasgow

Time of Flight measurements with MCP-PMT

Simulation and validation of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter response

PoS(ICRC2015)641. Cloud Monitoring using Nitrogen Laser for LHAASO Experiment. Z.D. Sun 1,Y. Zhang 2,F.R. Zhu 1 for the LHAASO Collaboration

From Here to a Neutrino Factory: Neutrino Oscillations Now and Again

Development of a low-mass and high-efficiency charged-particle detector

The Silicon-Tungsten Tracker of the DAMPE Mission

Cosmic Muon induced EM Showers in NOνA Detector

1 Introduction. KOPIO charged-particle vetos. K - RARE Meeting (Frascati) May Purpose of CPV: veto Kl

Overview of the COMET Phase-I experiment

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 30 Nov 2009

PoS(Nufact08)043. The Totally Active Scintillator Detector. Alan Bross 1 2. Malcolm Ellis. Steve Geer. Enrique Fernandez-Martinez.

Neutrino Cross Sections and Scattering Physics

A new IceCube starting track event selection and realtime event stream

Atmospheric Neutrinos and Neutrino Oscillations

FoCal Project in ALICE. Yota Kawamura for the ALICE FoCal collaboration TCHoU workshop 2018/3/15

K2K and T2K. 2006/10/19 For the 2006 External Review Panel. Masato Shiozawa Kamioka Observatory

K + Physics at J-PARC

LIQUID XE DETECTOR FOR MU E GAMMA SEARCH

Transcription:

The First Large Application of MPPC: T2K Neutrino Beam Monitor INGRID Kyoto University, Japan E-mail: masashi.o@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp We report design and performance of T2K neutrino beam monitor INGRID. INGRID has 9,592 channels which consists of scintillator, fiber, and MPPC. We assembled INGRID and tested all channels. RMS of MPPC gain is 5% and light yield with cosmic-ray is larger than 19.4 photoelectrons. International Workshop on New Photon Detectors PD09 June 24-26 2009 Shinshu University Matsumoto Japan Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/

1. Introduction The T2K(Tokai-to-Kamioka) experiment is long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment in Japan. J-PARC generates muon neutrino which is detected by near detector in J-PARC and SK(Super Kamiokande) located 295 km away from J-PARC(Fig.1). The main goals of T2K are precise measurement of ν µ disappearance and the discovery of ν e appearance. One of the feature of T2K is the off axis neutrino beam. The neutrino beam direction is around 2.5 degrees away from SK direction. The off axis beam makes neutrino energy spectrum at SK sharply peaked at the oscillation maximum(fig.2). The peak of the energy spectrum, however, strongly depends on off-axis angle. Therefore the neutrino beam direction has to be monitored with high precision. INGRID(Interactive Neutrino GRID) monitors the neutrino beam direction with required precision day-by-day at the designed beam power. Figure 1: The T2K(Tokai-to-Kamioka) experiment is long base line neutrino oscillation experiment in Japan. Muon neutrino produced at J-PARC is observed at near detector at J-PARC and Super Kamiokande at 295 km away from J- PARC. Figure 2: Top figure shows the beam neutrino energy spectrum expected at SK for several off axis angles. Bottom figure represents the oscillation probability at SK for oscillation parameters given in the figure. The neutrino beam is optimized to maximize the probability by choosing an appropriate off axis angle. 2. Design of INGRID Because the beam neutrino is widely distributed at near detector hall, INGRID has to cover wide range. Hence INGRID consists of sixteen identical modules arranged in a cross around ±5 m of the beam center(fig.3). INGRID module is a sandwich of nine irons and eleven scintillator tracking planes(fig.4). Scintillator tracking plane consists of horizontal and vertical scintillator layers which are made of twenty-four scintillator bars. Scintillator bar is 120 5 1 cm 3 and produced at FNAL[1]. Scintillation light is collected and transported with wave length shifting fiber which is inserted into a hole at the center of scintillator bar. One end of fiber is attached to MPPC(Multi Pixel Photon Counter). 2

MPPC is the production of Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.. MPPC gain is 7.5 10 5 at V over = 1.5V where V over is defined as V V br. All performances except noise rate are characterized with V over. ~120cm ~120cm iron Scintillator tracking plane Figure 3: Schematic view of the INGRID detector configuration. Sixteen identical modules are placed around the beam center and cover ±5 m area. Seven modules are placed in horizontal direction, another seven are in vertical, and two are off axis position. Figure 4: Schematic view of INGRID module. Module consists nine iron plates and eleven scintillator tracking planes. Iron plate at the most downstream position is missing. 3. Performance of one channel In order to monitor the beam direction with required precision all channels must have high detection efficiency. In other words all channel should have large light yield. We measured the light yield of prototype of the channel with 3 GeV electron beam at KEK FUJI test beam line. Fig.5 shows the setup of the measurement. Temperature is monitored with a temperature sensor and over voltage(v over ) is adjusted to 1.4 V. Fig.6 shows the distribution of the number of photoelectrons obtained by 3 GeV electron beam. The light yield defined as the peak of distribution is 15.0 photoelectrons. The efficiency expected from Poisson distribution is 99.9 % with 2.5 photoelectrons threshold. Consequently INGRID performance has met requirement. 4. Assembly and Performance of INGRID We assembled all scintillator planes from August 2008 to December 2008. Before installtion of all MPPCs, we measured the basic performances of all MPPCs[2]. Using this data, V over is set to 1.5 V. Just after assemly we checked the performances of all 9,592 channels. First we checked MPPC gain and then we measured light yield with cosmic-ray. First of all we checked ADC distribution of all channels by eye(fig.7). After that we calculated the distance between pedestal peak and 1 p.e. peak to obtain MPPC gain by the unit of ADC counts. RMS of MPPC gain is 5%(Fig.8). Finally we measured light yield of all channels with cosmic-ray. We piled up four scintillator planes and used top and bottom one as the trigger counter. In this analysis we defined light yield 3

Figure 5: Experimental setup of the measurement of light yield with 3 GeV electron beam at KEK FUJI test beam line. Electron beam events are triggered with upstream and downstream scintillation counter. Figure 6: Light yield distribution with 3 GeV electron beam. Light yield defined as the peak of distribution is 15.0 photoelectrons. Ch.1 Ch.2 Ch.3 Ch.4 Ch.5 Ch.6 Ch.7 Ch.8 Ch.9 Figure 7: Examples of ADC distribution of MPPC darknoise. The data was taken with periodic trigger. First large peak is pedestal and second one is 1 p.e. peak and so on. All distributions are almost identical. 40 70 Gain[ADC counts] Figure 8: The distribution of MPPC gain with the unit of ADC counts. RMS of gain is 5%. as the mean of the number of photoelectrons because the number of events is not enough to fit the peak of the distribution. Light yield of all channels is larger than 19.4 photoelectrons. From June 2009 to October we assembled and installed all INGRID modules. T2K neutrino beam commissioning will start from October 2009. 5. Summary We designed INGRID for the T2K neutrino beam monitor and tested prototype channel of it with the 3 GeV electron beam. One channel consists of scintillator bar, fiber and MPPC. The light yield of prototype channel is 15.0 photoelectrons which is high enough. We assembled INGRID and tested all channels. RMS of gain is 5% and light yield of all channels is larger than 19.4 photoelectrons. Consequently we expect INGRID has required peformance and observe T2K first neutrino event at beam commissioning which will start from October 2009. 4

entries Short Title for header 20 cut 10 0 50 100 # of photoelectrons Figure 9: The distribution of light yield with cosmic-ray. We cut the events which have smaller than 10 photoelectrons in order to remove the MPPC noise event amplified by cross talk and after pulse. Light yield is defined as the mean of the distribution. mean of each channel Figure 10: Light yield of each channel. Light yield is larger than 19.4 photoelectrons. Acknowledgments It is a pleasure to thank KEK FUJI test beam line group. We are grateful to Mechanical Support Co. for helping assembly of INGRID. References [1] A.Pla-Dalmau,A.D.Bross,and V.V.Rykalin, FERMILAB-CONF-03-3180E. [2] M.Yokoyama et al."mass production test of Hamamatsu MPPC for T2K neutrino oscillation experiment", arxiv:0807.3147 5