A decision support system for predicting seasonal rainfall variations in sub-humid and semi-arid high country areas

Similar documents
NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION MEETING. December 3, 2008 Birmingham Alabama. Roger McNeil Service Hydrologist NWS Birmingham Alabama

Analysis of Rainfall and Other Weather Parameters under Climatic Variability of Parbhani ( )

Inflow Forecasting for Hydro Catchments. Ross Woods and Alistair McKerchar NIWA Christchurch

El Nino: Outlook VAM-WFP HQ September 2018

Global Climates. Name Date

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

CHAPTER-11 CLIMATE AND RAINFALL

Variability of Reference Evapotranspiration Across Nebraska

CATCHMENT DESCRIPTION. Little River Catchment Management Plan Stage I Report Climate 4.0

2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

Drought in Southeast Colorado

Will a warmer world change Queensland s rainfall?

YACT (Yet Another Climate Tool)? The SPI Explorer

Communicating Climate Change Consequences for Land Use

Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook

The Climate of Bryan County

Climate also has a large influence on how local ecosystems have evolved and how we interact with them.

Sierra Weather and Climate Update

Study of Hydrometeorology in a Hard Rock Terrain, Kadirischist Belt Area, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh

Agricultural Science Climatology Semester 2, Anne Green / Richard Thompson

CLIMATE OVERVIEW. Thunder Bay Climate Overview Page 1 of 5

El Nino 2015 in South Sudan: Impacts and Perspectives. Raul Cumba

2015 Fall Conditions Report

A SUMMARY OF RAINFALL AT THE CARNARVON EXPERIMENT STATION,

Christopher ISU

The Climate of Marshall County

Seasonal Climate Watch June to October 2018

El Nino 2015: The Story So Far and What To Expect Next

El Nino 2015: The Story So Far and What To Expect Next

The Climate of Payne County

2003 Moisture Outlook

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

Champaign-Urbana 2000 Annual Weather Summary

DROUGHT IN MAINLAND PORTUGAL

Analysis of Historical Pattern of Rainfall in the Western Region of Bangladesh

The Colorado Drought : 2003: A Growing Concern. Roger Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center.

Three main areas of work:

Seasonal Climate Watch July to November 2018

What Does It Take to Get Out of Drought?

US Drought Status. Droughts 1/17/2013. Percent land area affected by Drought across US ( ) Dev Niyogi Associate Professor Dept of Agronomy

The Climate of Kiowa County

The Climate of Murray County

GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

Geostatistical Analysis of Rainfall Temperature and Evaporation Data of Owerri for Ten Years

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

Tracking the Climate Of Northern Colorado Nolan Doesken State Climatologist Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University

Monthly overview. Rainfall

UK Flooding Feb 2003

The Climate of Haskell County

Minnesota s Climatic Conditions, Outlook, and Impacts on Agriculture. Today. 1. The weather and climate of 2017 to date

ZUMWALT WEATHER AND CLIMATE ANNUAL REPORT ( )

Seasonal Climate Watch April to August 2018

A Report on a Statistical Model to Forecast Seasonal Inflows to Cowichan Lake

Summary report for Ruamāhanga Whaitua Committee The climate of the Ruamāhanga catchment

The Climate of Grady County

Climate of Columbus. Aaron Wilson. Byrd Polar & Climate Research Center State Climate Office of Ohio.

Fire Season Prediction for Canada, Kerry Anderson Canadian Forest Service

8.1 Attachment 1: Ambient Weather Conditions at Jervoise Bay, Cockburn Sound

The Climate of Seminole County

Seasonal Climate Watch September 2018 to January 2019

A summary of the weather year based on data from the Zumwalt weather station

On the presence of tropical vortices over the Southeast Asian Sea- Maritime Continent region

The Palfai Drought Index (PaDI) Expansion of applicability of Hungarian PAI for South East Europe (SEE) region Summary

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF SURFACE WATER RESOURCES - A STUDY FROM DEDURU OYA BASIN OF SRI LANKA

The Climate of Pontotoc County

HAIDA GWAII CLIMATE ASSESSMENT 2010 Special Report for MIEDS Franc Pridoehl

ANALYSIS OF CLIMATIC DATA FOR THE CHATEAU, MT RUAPHEHU ( ), IN RELATION TO CLIMATIC CHANGE

Percentage of normal rainfall for August 2017 Departure from average air temperature for August 2017

Statistical Analysis of Temperature and Rainfall Trend in Raipur District of Chhattisgarh

Weather History on the Bishop Paiute Reservation

Science Standard 1: Students analyze monthly precipitation and temperature records, displayed in bar charts, collected in metric units (mm).

East Africa: The 2017 Season. Somalia again on the brink of drought

Climate Variability in South Asia

Dust storm variability over EGYPT By Fathy M ELashmawy Egyptian Meteorological Authority

Lesson 8: Variability in a Data Distribution

Rainfall Observations in the Loxahatchee River Watershed

2016 Meteorology Summary

The Climate of Texas County

NIWA Outlook: March-May 2015

January 25, Summary

REPORT ON SOWING PERIOD AND FLOODING RISKS IN DOUALA, CAMEROON. Cameroon Meteorological Department

SEASONAL CLIMATE OUTLOOK VALID FOR JULY-AUGUST- SEPTEMBER 2013 IN WEST AFRICA, CHAD AND CAMEROON

Champaign-Urbana 2001 Annual Weather Summary

Multivariate Regression Model Results

NIWA Outlook: October - December 2015

Constructing a typical meteorological year -TMY for Voinesti fruit trees region and the effects of global warming on the orchard ecosystem

Champaign-Urbana 1999 Annual Weather Summary

El Nino: Outlook 2018

CAMARGO RANCH, llc. CRAIG BUFORD BufordResources.com

REMOTELY SENSED INFORMATION FOR CROP MONITORING AND FOOD SECURITY

What s the value of rain forecasts for dryland cotton? Preliminary. Rebecca Darbyshire

The Colorado Drought of 2002 in Perspective

JOINT BRIEFING TO THE MEMBERS. El Niño 2018/19 Likelihood and potential impact

UWM Field Station meteorological data

Validation of the Weather Generator CLIGEN with Precipitation Data from Uganda. W. J. Elliot C. D. Arnold 1

CLIMATE OF THE ZUMWALT PRAIRIE OF NORTHEASTERN OREGON FROM 1930 TO PRESENT

U.S. Outlook For October and Winter Thursday, September 19, 2013

Modeling of peak inflow dates for a snowmelt dominated basin Evan Heisman. CVEN 6833: Advanced Data Analysis Fall 2012 Prof. Balaji Rajagopalan

NASA Products to Enhance Energy Utility Load Forecasting

Transcription:

Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 58: 87 91 (1996) 87 A decision support system for predicting seasonal rainfall variations in sub-humid and semi-arid high country areas G.K. HUTCHINSON AgResearch Tara Hills High Country Research Station, Rural Bag 19, Omarama Abstract The variable seasonal pattern of pasture production is dominantly influenced by rainfall in the semiarid and sub-humid high country regions. A decision support system for predicting seasonal rainfall has been developed and tested using the rainfall data from 14 sites in the semi-arid, sub-humid and humid high country zones. The prediction system improves the chances of making a correct or incorrect but conservative risk management decision from 50:50 to as much as 92:8 dependent on the site s weather characteristics and the length of rainfall records available. The system provides support for risk management decisions such as whether to employ the buffers of stocking rate adjustments and feed conservation measures usually present in most high country farming systems to cope with the variability in seasonal pasture growth. The method has particular applicability in the semi-arid and subhumid areas of the inland basins and foothills and the mid Waitaki area. Keywords: decision support, high country, rainfall, risk management, semi-arid, sub-humid Introduction To be useful, weather information should help in making decisions. These decisions may be based directly on the information content of data or indirectly through the way in which the information affects a decision variable, such as an environmental production function (Revfeim & Hurnard 1980). In the harsh high country environment, seasonal pasture growth is highly variable from year to year. The seasonal pattern of pasture production depends on a number of factors but is dominantly influenced by rainfall in the sub-humid region of the high country including the intermontane basins and the mid Waitaki (O Connor 1968). Farmers in this environment have historically had no management tools that can effectively assist them in predicting a season s likely pasture growth pattern. Even faithfully recorded monthly or daily rainfall data have not been very useful in improving predictability of the nature of the upcoming growth season in comparison with making a random choice at the decision time based on instinct, experience and the chance probability (similar to tossing a coin) of getting it right on average at least 50% of the time. The challenge to science is to see whether a model incorporating objective rainfall data can provide a reasonably simple but better method for farmers to improve the odds in their favour of making a correct decision (or at least a conservative decision if wrong) on rainfall expectations for the next six months. Background The concept of a predictive model has been developed and initially tested using 45 years of rainfall records at AgResearch Tara Hills High Country Research Station at Omarama in an attempt to address this challenge. Figure 1 Average Monthly Rainfall (mm) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 JAN Annual average rainfall at Tara Hills High Country Research Station, Omarama. FEB Average Annual Rainfall = 528mm pa MAR APR MAY JUN The average monthly rainfall data for Tara Hills High Country Research Station from 1950 to 1995 (Figure 1) creates the impression that the monthly rainfall pattern is remarkably consistent at 34 58 mm. This averaged monthly rainfall data in fact mask a wide range of extremes in which any month can receive a rainfall varying between 2 mm and 204 mm (Figure 2). Identifying some sort of pattern within this wide variability (CV%=70) is difficult but necessary if the aim is to improve the odds for good decision making. The combination of low rainfall, high altitude and inland location make Tara Hills an extreme farming environment. Monthly rainfall probabilities do not favour sustained pasture growth at any time of the year; although a positive soil water store coming out of winter JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

88 means there is always some sort of plant growth in spring (Wardle et al. 1992). The average pattern of expected dry matter production for the research station (Figure 3) shows that most of the effective feed is produced in three spring months of the year (October December), that an autumn flush of feed is not reliable and that there is a long winter period during which the property relies on various forms of conserved feed and controlled grazing. High wind run in conjunction with high temperatures, high sunshine hours and low humidity virtually nullify the effectiveness of summer rain, despite precipitation being evenly spread throughout the year. Therefore, soil moisture over summer months is usually insufficient to support sustained pasture growth (Wardle et al. 1992). The need for conservative management with large buffers in the farming system and useful decision support tools becomes more apparent in this environment. Method A computer-based model, initially for predicting rainfall and likely growth season (November April) rainfall in relation to previous rainfall, was developed and tested using the 45 years of rainfall records at Tara Hills High Country Research Station from 1950 to 1994. The model was also tested using a range of cumulative rainfall periods (from 1 to 12 months) to ascertain which was the most appropriate to give the best chance of improving the odds of better rainfall prediction. A flexibility component was also built into the model on the assumption that if the resulting rain fell somewhere within a range of the prediction, it would still have given an acceptable rainfall prediction for use in management decisions. Differences greater than the flexibility component would give predictions that were either highly conservative (a much wetter year occurs than predicted) or wildly optimistic (a much drier year occurs than predicted). The model was tested on a range of semi-arid, subhumid and humid rainfall sites in the high country area Figure 2 Rainfall (mm). total DM (Tonnes) 250 200 150 100 50 0 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Jan Figure 3 Variability in Monthly Rainfall at Tara Hills Research Station. Feb Mar Apr May Jun Minimum monthly rainfall Average monthly rainfall Maximum monthly rainfall Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jul Average total dry matter production at Tara Hills Research Station. IRRIGATED FLATS -220ha DRY FLATS- 455ha HILL- 2665ha Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Table 1 How well did the model predict the next six months rainfall from 1 August for the period 1970 1980 at Tara Hills Research Station? Year Annual Model Prediction for next 6 Outcome for 6-month period Actual Outcome rainfall (mm) months from 1 Aug 31 Jan from 1 Aug rainfall (mm) vs model (Feb Jan) for 6 months prediction from 1 Aug 1970 613 significantly less than average significantly more than average 434 0 1971 486 significantly less than average about average 298 0 1972 538 about average about average 317 + 1973 418 significantly less than average significantly less than average 250 + 1974 519 significantly more than average significantly less than average 193-1975 565 significantly more than average significantly less than average 185-1976 431 significantly less than average significantly less than average 255 + 1977 336 significantly less than average significantly less than average 143 + 1978 511 about average about average 268 + 1979 732 significantly more than average significantly more than average 396 + 1980 580 about average about average 308 + Average annual rainfall = 544 mm (Feb Jan) + = correct prediction 0 = wrong but conservative prediction - = wrong & over-optimistic prediction

89 to see whether the results were repeatable at other places with reasonable length of rainfall records. The model was then adjusted to test the quality of seasonal (6-month) rainfall prediction results at various decision points throughout the year at the same range of rainfall stations. Results The model was tested using lesser and greater lengths of historical records to identify its predictability over a range of periods but the best results were obtained in predicting what the next 6 months of rainfall were likely to be. The use of 6 months as the prediction period also has some practical rationale in that this would be likely to be the maximum period of consequential benefit of a significant rainfall event within a farming system in the sub-humid zone before that water is effectively lost to the pasture system through evaporation or groundwater flow. The 6-month prediction period also has some correlation with the reported cycle length of the El Nino/La Nina weather systems which markedly influence New Zealand weather. This was also recognised as the likely seasonal period for which predictability advice would be of most benefit in management decisions. The model indicates that in the case of Tara Hills, either a correct prediction or a poor but conservative prediction would have been made in 76% of the years and in only 24% of years would a decision based on the prediction have been a bad or over-optimistic one (Table 2). This is a distinct improvement on the 50:50 odds of any decision based purely on instinct. An example of the model s prediction and actual outcome for the 6-month rainfall period from 1 August in 1970 until 1980 at Tara Hills. Similar or better results were obtained for the seven other sites in the sub-humid zone that were tested except for Tekapo (74%) and Omahau (72%) where the model gave worse results but still enabled decisions to be correct or poor but conservative for significantly more than 50% of the time. The model gave a high level of predictability at the two semi-arid zone sites, with correct or poor but conservative decisions being made in 92% of years at Ranfurly and 86% of years at Otematata. The accuracy of decisions in the humid zone above 650 mm drops significantly back to almost the random choice odds of 50:50 but as the annual pasture yield in this zone is little influenced by year-to-year variations in rainfall (O Connor et al. 1968), there is less likelihood of rainfall being as important in the decision process. The model was then tested at the range of sites for its variability when different decision points are chosen. A number of other prediction points were tested and Table 2 Testing the model at various rainfall stations: how accurately did it predict the growth season s rainfall at a November decision point? Predictability model outcomes Rainfall No. of Average Max. Min. SD Correct Wrong but Wrong and Station records annual annual annual decisions conservative over-optimistic rainfall rainfall rainfall decisions decisions (mm) (mm) (mm) Semi-arid rainfall zone (300 450 mm pa) Ranfurly 48 424 607 269 73 79% 13% 8% Otematata 36 435 604 267 87 72% 14% 14% Sub-humid rainfall zone (450 650 mm pa) Grays Hills 46 457 627 334 76 67% 13% 20% Cliffside 42 504 679 270 88 62% 19% 19% Tara Hills 45 528 772 344 105 60% 16% 24% Waipiata 53 550 752 244 87 78% 13% 9% Omahau 25 566 821 377 115 44% 28% 28% Tekapo 69 601 881 324 126 54% 20% 26% Naseby Forest 72 607 879 419 89 67% 15% 18% Glenbrook 19 607 794 425 112 68% 16% 16% Humid rainfall zone (650 1500 mm pa) Wanaka 64 678 952 418 138 44% 27% 30% Fairlie 53 728 1061 467 136 44% 26% 30% Ben Ohau 29 742 1079 504 136 48% 24% 28% Lake Coleridge 46 851 1161 557 142 59% 20% 22% NB Wrong but conservative decisions are those where the prediction is wrong but the consequences for management are minimal. Wrong and over-optimistic decisions are those wrong predictions with major consequence for the management process.

90 while the percentage of predictability varied between prediction dates, the model continued to give results that were much better than the 50:50 odds of an instinctive decision (Table 3). Table 3 Discussion Testing the model at various rainfall stations: how accurately did it predict the next six month s rainfall for a different decision point (April)? Rainfall No. of Average Correct or Wrong & overstation records annual wrong but optimistic rainfall conservative decisions (mm) decisions April Decision Point Semi-Arid Rainfall Zone (300 450 mm pa) Ranfurly 48 424 96% 4% Otematata 36 435 92% 8% Sub-Humid Rainfall Zone (450 650 mm pa) Grays Hills 46 457 80% 20% Cliffside 42 504 86% 14% Tara Hills 45 528 95% 5% Waipiata 53 550 94% 6% Omahau 25 566 80% 20% Tekapo 69 601 81% 19% Naseby Forest 72 607 89% 11% Glenbrook 19 607 85% 16% Humid Rainfall Zone ( 650 1500 mm pa) Wanaka 64 678 82% 18% Fairlie 53 728 80% 20% Ben Ohau 29 742 72% 28% Lake Coleridge 46 851 72% 28% With the use of rainfall data and a relatively simple model, a reasonable level of confidence can be achieved in predicting the nature of the likely growing season by the usual critical decision time in early November. The model also gives a reasonable level of confidence to 6- month rainfall predictions for decision making at other times of the year. It should be emphasised that this is not a perfect model; it cannot accurately predict likely rainfall on a daily or monthly basis, particularly in the highly variable sites in the sub-humid and semi-arid zones of New Zealand, but it can definitely improve the odds for rainfall prediction for better decision making on a seasonal basis. The decision support system can be used by most farmers who either operate a rain gauge on their property or have an official meteorological station in their vicinity and are aware of the variations in rainfall patterns between the station and their own property. Obviously, length of records will have a major impact on the quality of the prediction; Stations tested to date have had at least 19 years of rainfall records and it is suggested that at least 15 years of records are required before any patterns of predictability begin to emerge. The method has the potential to incorporate objective predictive measurements to give more confidence to the risk management decisions on whether to employ the buffers usually present in most high country farming systems to cope with the variability in seasonal pasture growth. Most buffers involve seasonal decision-making responses rather than daily, weekly or monthly responses. These buffers usually involve the manipulation of stocking numbers, or other risk management decisions such as the level of feed conservation to employ (hay, silage, crops or saved pasture). The model has potential to improve the quality of decision making on a seasonal basis. The method has applicability in the semi-arid and sub-humid area of the inland basins and foothills and the mid-waitaki area where seasonal fluctuations in pasture growth are often observed and rainfall is the main limiting factor to pasture growth, but will not be as effective in the humid areas of the upper montane zone where year-to-year variations in rainfall have little effect on annual yield. The model has wider applicability than just the farming community; other seasonal weatherdependent decision makers such as power generation authorities and tourist operators may also gain benefits from better seasonal prediction methods. The model would still benefit from more extensive testing over a wider range of climatic zones but has the potential to become the basis of a useful decision support tool especially for farmers for use in farm management decision processes. The model is currently being developed into a commercial decision support tool (called HUSERAP) by AgResearch. Details of the methodology are therefore limited by the need to protect the intellectual property involved. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks are owing to Robert Gibson (Landcare) for assistance with rainfall data, Bruce Allan, Bill Lowther, Colin Boswell and Peter Johnstone (AgResearch), and to Tony Trewinnard (Blue Skies Weather Forecasting) for support and constructive comments on the model and paper. REFERENCES O Connor, K.F.; Vartha, E.W.; Belcher, R.A.; Coulter, J.D. 1968. Seasonal and annual variation in pasture production in Canterbury and North Otago. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 30: 50 63.

Revfeim, K.J.A.; Hurnard, S.M. 1980. Pasture, pumpkins, persimmons or pines the use of weather information in planning plant and animal production in the 1980s. NZ agricultural science 14: 160 162. Wardle, R.; Gibson, R.; Robertshaw, J.; Duncan, R. 1992. Climate Information for the semi-arid lands of the South Island. Rabbit and Land Management News Sept 1992; Manaaki Whenua, Landcare Research, Alexandra.! 91

92