Standard Young Tableaux Old and New

Similar documents
Patterns in Standard Young Tableaux

NOTES ABOUT SATURATED CHAINS IN THE DYCK PATH POSET. 1. Basic Definitions

YOUNG TABLEAUX AND THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP

Cylindric Young Tableaux and their Properties

Reduced words and a formula of Macdonald

MULTI-ORDERED POSETS. Lisa Bishop Department of Mathematics, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041, United States.

Characters, Derangements and Descents for the Hyperoctahedral Group

Combinatorial Structures

Enumeration on row-increasing tableaux of shape 2 n

Coxeter-Knuth Classes and a Signed Little Bijection

Asymptotics for minimal overlapping patterns for generalized Euler permutations, standard tableaux of rectangular shapes, and column strict arrays

QUASISYMMETRIC (k, l)-hook SCHUR FUNCTIONS

Coxeter-Knuth Graphs and a signed Little Bijection

Boolean Product Polynomials and the Resonance Arrangement

Factorization of the Robinson-Schensted-Knuth Correspondence

Enumerative Combinatorics with Fillings of Polyominoes

Increasing and Decreasing Subsequences

Refined Cauchy/Littlewood identities and partition functions of the six-vertex model

Random sorting networks

q-alg/ v2 15 Sep 1997

Multiplicity Free Expansions of Schur P-Functions

The symmetric group action on rank-selected posets of injective words

Enumerative Combinatorics with Fillings of Polyominoes

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 16 Aug 2018

Skew row-strict quasisymmetric Schur functions

Matrix compositions. Emanuele Munarini. Dipartimento di Matematica Politecnico di Milano

RCC. Drew Armstrong. FPSAC 2017, Queen Mary, London. University of Miami armstrong

Shifted symmetric functions I: the vanishing property, skew Young diagrams and symmetric group characters

arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 18 May 2017

Combinatorics for algebraic geometers

ENUMERATION OF TREES AND ONE AMAZING REPRESENTATION OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP. Igor Pak Harvard University

GENERALIZATION OF THE SIGN REVERSING INVOLUTION ON THE SPECIAL RIM HOOK TABLEAUX. Jaejin Lee

A Formula for the Specialization of Skew Schur Functions

On Descents in Standard Young Tableaux arxiv:math/ v1 [math.co] 3 Jul 2000

Counting chains in noncrossing partition lattices

Row-strict quasisymmetric Schur functions

Primes, partitions and permutations. Paul-Olivier Dehaye ETH Zürich, October 31 st

CHAINS OF MAXIMUM LENGTH IN THE TAMARI LATTICE

Smith Normal Form and Combinatorics

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 2 Dec 2008

Smith Normal Form and Combinatorics

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 28 Feb 2012

THE MAJOR COUNTING OF NONINTERSECTING LATTICE PATHS AND GENERATING FUNCTIONS FOR TABLEAUX Summary

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 23 Feb 2012

SHIFTED K-THEORETIC POIRIER-REUTENAUER BIALGEBRA

Combinatorial properties of the numbers of tableaux of bounded height

Littlewood Richardson polynomials

The Littlewood-Richardson Rule

LARGE SCHRÖDER PATHS BY TYPES AND SYMMETRIC FUNCTIONS

On Multiplicity-free Products of Schur P -functions. 1 Introduction

Young s Natural Representations of S 4

Lecture 6 : Kronecker Product of Schur Functions Part I

EQUIDISTRIBUTION AND SIGN-BALANCE ON 321-AVOIDING PERMUTATIONS

KRONECKER POWERS CHARACTER POLYNOMIALS. A. Goupil, with C. Chauve and A. Garsia,

Operators on k-tableaux and the k-littlewood Richardson rule for a special case. Sarah Elizabeth Iveson

Sergey Fomin* and. Minneapolis, MN We consider the partial order on partitions of integers dened by removal of

The (q, t)-catalan Numbers and the Space of Diagonal Harmonics. James Haglund. University of Pennsylvania

Pattern Avoidance of Generalized Permutations

Hook formulas for skew shapes (extended abstract)

PLANE PARTITIONS AMY BECKER, LILLY BETKE-BRUNSWICK, ANNA ZINK

DUAL IMMACULATE QUASISYMMETRIC FUNCTIONS EXPAND POSITIVELY INTO YOUNG QUASISYMMETRIC SCHUR FUNCTIONS

The Murnaghan-Nakayama Rule

A NATURAL GENERALISATION OF BALANCED TABLEAUX

Plücker Relations on Schur Functions

Cyclic sieving for longest reduced words in the hyperoctahedral group

Skew quantum Murnaghan-Nakayama rule

ON KRONECKER PRODUCTS OF CHARACTERS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS WITH FEW COMPONENTS

ALGEBRAIC COMBINATORICS

THE KNUTH RELATIONS HUAN VO

A DECOMPOSITION OF SCHUR FUNCTIONS AND AN ANALOGUE OF THE ROBINSON-SCHENSTED-KNUTH ALGORITHM

Geometric RSK, Whittaker functions and random polymers

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.co] 27 Nov 2006

On Böttcher s mysterious identity

arxiv: v4 [math.co] 7 Aug 2017

Problem 1. Let f n (x, y), n Z, be the sequence of rational functions in two variables x and y given by the initial conditions.

d-complete Posets and Hook Formulas Soichi OKADA (Nagoya University) Algebraic and Enumerative Combinatorics in Okayama Okayama, Feb.

The half-plactic monoïd

Two Remarks on Skew Tableaux

Two Remarks on Skew Tableaux

Some Catalan Musings p. 1. Some Catalan Musings. Richard P. Stanley

A Murnaghan-Nakayama Rule for k-schur Functions

Modular representations of symmetric groups: An Overview

Results and conjectures on the number of standard strong marked tableaux

From longest increasing subsequences to Whittaker functions and random polymers

A Note on Skew Characters of Symmetric Groups Jay Taylor

Pieri s Formula for Generalized Schur Polynomials

AN ALGORITHMIC SIGN-REVERSING INVOLUTION FOR SPECIAL RIM-HOOK TABLEAUX

COUNTING NONINTERSECTING LATTICE PATHS WITH TURNS

Rational Catalan Combinatorics: Intro

Noncommutative Schur P -functions and the shifted plactic monoid

Poset and Polytope Perspectives On Alternating Sign Matrices

Multiplicity-Free Products of Schur Functions

Representation theory & the Hubbard model

arxiv: v3 [math.co] 4 Apr 2014

A Pieri rule for key polynomials

Algebraic and Enumerative Combinatorics in Okayama

An Investigation on an Extension of Mullineux Involution

Orthogonal polynomials, lattice paths, and skew Young tableaux

Maximal supports and Schur-positivity among connected skew shapes

ALGEBRAIC COMBINATORICS

Transcription:

Standard Young Tableaux Old and New Ron Adin and Yuval Roichman Department of Mathematics Bar-Ilan University Workshop on Group Theory in Memory of David Chillag Technion, Haifa, Oct. 14 1 2 4 3 5 7 6 8 9 1 2 4 3 5 7 6 8 9

David Chillag

Abstract More than a hundred years ago, Frobenius and Young based the emerging representation theory of the symmetric group on the combinatorial objects now called Standard Young Tableaux (SYT). Many important features of these classical objects have since been discovered, including some surprising interpretations and the celebrated hook length formula for their number. In recent years, SYT of non-classical shapes have come up in research and were shown to have, in many cases, surprisingly nice enumeration formulas. The talk will present some gems from the study of SYT over the years, based on a recent survey paper. No prior acquaintance assumed.

Founders

Founders A. Young

Founders A. Young F. G. Frobenius

Founders A. Young F. G. Frobenius P. A. MacMahon

Classical

Introduction Consider throwing balls labeled 1, 2,..., n into a V-shaped bin with perpendicular sides.

Introduction Consider throwing balls labeled 1, 2,..., n into a V-shaped bin with perpendicular sides. 1

Introduction Consider throwing balls labeled 1, 2,..., n into a V-shaped bin with perpendicular sides. 2 1

Introduction Consider throwing balls labeled 1, 2,..., n into a V-shaped bin with perpendicular sides. 2 3 1

Introduction Consider throwing balls labeled 1, 2,..., n into a V-shaped bin with perpendicular sides. 2 3 1 4

Introduction Consider throwing balls labeled 1, 2,..., n into a V-shaped bin with perpendicular sides. 5 2 3 1 4

Introduction Consider throwing balls labeled 1, 2,..., n into a V-shaped bin with perpendicular sides. 5 2 3 1 4 Rotate:

Introduction Consider throwing balls labeled 1, 2,..., n into a V-shaped bin with perpendicular sides. 5 2 3 1 4 Rotate: 1 2 3 5 4

Introduction Consider throwing balls labeled 1, 2,..., n into a V-shaped bin with perpendicular sides. 5 2 3 1 4 Rotate: 1 2 3 5 4 1 2 3 5 4

Diagrams and Tableaux

Diagrams and Tableaux partition diagram/shape λ = (4, 3, 1) 8 [λ] =

Diagrams and Tableaux partition diagram/shape λ = (4, 3, 1) 8 [λ] = Standard Young Tableau (SYT): T = 1 2 5 8 3 4 6 7 SYT(4, 3, 1). Entries increase along rows and columns

Conventions 1 2 3 5 4 5 4 4 2 3 3 5 1 1 2 English Russian French

Number of SYT

Number of SYT f λ = # SYT(λ)

Number of SYT f λ = # SYT(λ) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 4 3 5 1 2 5 3 4 1 3 4 2 5 1 3 5 2 4

Number of SYT f λ = # SYT(λ) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 4 3 5 1 2 5 3 4 1 3 4 2 5 1 3 5 2 4 λ = (3, 2), f λ = 5

SYT and S n Representations S n = the symmetric group on n letters

SYT and S n Representations S n = the symmetric group on n letters λ χ λ partition of n irreducible character of S n

SYT and S n Representations S n = the symmetric group on n letters λ χ λ partition of n irreducible character of S n SYT(λ) basis of representation space

SYT and S n Representations S n = the symmetric group on n letters λ χ λ partition of n irreducible character of S n SYT(λ) basis of representation space f λ = χ λ (id)

SYT and S n Representations S n = the symmetric group on n letters λ χ λ partition of n irreducible character of S n SYT(λ) basis of representation space f λ = χ λ (id) Corollary: (f λ ) 2 = n! λ n

[Robinson, Schensted (, Knuth)] RS(K) Correspondence

[Robinson, Schensted (, Knuth)] RS(K) Correspondence π (P, Q) permutation pair of SYT of the same shape

[Robinson, Schensted (, Knuth)] RS(K) Correspondence π (P, Q) permutation pair of SYT of the same shape 4236517 1 3 5 7 2 6 4, 1 3 4 7 2 5 6

[Robinson, Schensted (, Knuth)] RS(K) Correspondence π (P, Q) permutation pair of SYT of the same shape 4236517 1 3 5 7 2 6 4, 1 3 4 7 2 5 6 Corollary: (f λ ) 2 = n! λ n

Interpretation: The Young Lattice A SYT describes a growth process of diagrams.

Interpretation: The Young Lattice A SYT describes a growth process of diagrams. For example, 1 2 5 3 4 corresponds to the process

Interpretation: The Young Lattice A SYT describes a growth process of diagrams. For example, 1 2 5 3 4 corresponds to the process

Interpretation: The Young Lattice A SYT describes a growth process of diagrams. For example, 1 2 5 3 4 corresponds to the process

Interpretation: The Young Lattice A SYT describes a growth process of diagrams. For example, 1 2 5 3 4 corresponds to the process

Interpretation: The Young Lattice A SYT describes a growth process of diagrams. For example, 1 2 5 3 4 corresponds to the process

Interpretation: The Young Lattice A SYT describes a growth process of diagrams. For example, 1 2 5 3 4 corresponds to the process The Young lattice consists of all partitions (diagrams), of all sizes, ordered by inclusion.

Interpretation: The Young Lattice A SYT describes a growth process of diagrams. For example, 1 2 5 3 4 corresponds to the process The Young lattice consists of all partitions (diagrams), of all sizes, ordered by inclusion. SYT(λ) maximal chains in the Young lattice from to λ

Interpretation: The Young Lattice A SYT describes a growth process of diagrams. For example, 1 2 5 3 4 corresponds to the process The Young lattice consists of all partitions (diagrams), of all sizes, ordered by inclusion. SYT(λ) maximal chains in the Young lattice from to λ The number of such maximal chains is therefore f λ.

Interpretation: Lattice Paths Each SYT of shape λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ) corresponds to a lattice path in R t, from the origin 0 to the point λ, where in each step exactly one of the coordinates changes (by adding 1), while staying within the region {(x 1,..., x t ) R t x 1... x t 0}.

Interpretation: Lattice Paths Each SYT of shape λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ) corresponds to a lattice path in R t, from the origin 0 to the point λ, where in each step exactly one of the coordinates changes (by adding 1), while staying within the region {(x 1,..., x t ) R t x 1... x t 0}. x 2 x 1

Interpretation: Lattice Paths Each SYT of shape λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ) corresponds to a lattice path in R t, from the origin 0 to the point λ, where in each step exactly one of the coordinates changes (by adding 1), while staying within the region {(x 1,..., x t ) R t x 1... x t 0}. x 2 1 x 1

Interpretation: Lattice Paths Each SYT of shape λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ) corresponds to a lattice path in R t, from the origin 0 to the point λ, where in each step exactly one of the coordinates changes (by adding 1), while staying within the region {(x 1,..., x t ) R t x 1... x t 0}. x 2 1 2 x 1

Interpretation: Lattice Paths Each SYT of shape λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ) corresponds to a lattice path in R t, from the origin 0 to the point λ, where in each step exactly one of the coordinates changes (by adding 1), while staying within the region {(x 1,..., x t ) R t x 1... x t 0}. x 2 x 1 1 2 3

Interpretation: Lattice Paths Each SYT of shape λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ) corresponds to a lattice path in R t, from the origin 0 to the point λ, where in each step exactly one of the coordinates changes (by adding 1), while staying within the region {(x 1,..., x t ) R t x 1... x t 0}. x 2 x 1 1 2 3 4

Interpretation: Lattice Paths Each SYT of shape λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ) corresponds to a lattice path in R t, from the origin 0 to the point λ, where in each step exactly one of the coordinates changes (by adding 1), while staying within the region {(x 1,..., x t ) R t x 1... x t 0}. x 2 λ = (3, 2) 1 2 x 1 3 4 5

Interpretation: Order Polytope The order polytope corresponding to a diagram D is P(D) := {f : D [0, 1] c D c = f (c) f (c ) ( c, c D)}, where D is the natural partial order between the cells of D. It is a closed convex subset of the unit cube [0, 1] D.

Interpretation: Order Polytope The order polytope corresponding to a diagram D is P(D) := {f : D [0, 1] c D c = f (c) f (c ) ( c, c D)}, where D is the natural partial order between the cells of D. It is a closed convex subset of the unit cube [0, 1] D. a b c d e

Interpretation: Order Polytope The order polytope corresponding to a diagram D is P(D) := {f : D [0, 1] c D c = f (c) f (c ) ( c, c D)}, where D is the natural partial order between the cells of D. It is a closed convex subset of the unit cube [0, 1] D. a b c d e f : {a, b, c, d, e} [0, 1] f (a) f (b) f (c) f (d) f (e) f (a) f (d) f (b) f (e)

Interpretation: Order Polytope The order polytope corresponding to a diagram D is P(D) := {f : D [0, 1] c D c = f (c) f (c ) ( c, c D)}, where D is the natural partial order between the cells of D. It is a closed convex subset of the unit cube [0, 1] D. Observation: a b c d e f : {a, b, c, d, e} [0, 1] f (a) f (b) f (c) f (d) f (e) f (a) f (d) f (b) f (e) vol P(D) = f D D!.

Interpretation: Reduced Words (1) The following theorem was conjectured and first proved by Stanley using symmetric functions. A bijective proof was given later by Edelman and Greene. Theorem: [Stanley 1984, Edelman-Green 1987] The number of reduced words (in adjacent transpositions) of the longest permutation w 0 := [n, n 1,..., 1] in S n is equal to the number of SYT of staircase shape δ n 1 = (n 1, n 2,..., 1).

Interpretation: Reduced Words (2) An analogue for type B was conjectured by Stanley and proved by Haiman. Theorem: [Haiman 1989] The number of reduced words (in the alphabet of Coxeter generators) of the longest element w 0 := [ 1, 2,..., n] in B n is equal to the number of SYT of square n n shape.

Product and Determinantal Formulas For a partition λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ), let l i := λ i + t i (1 i t).

Product and Determinantal Formulas For a partition λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ), let l i := λ i + t i (1 i t). Theorem: [Frobenius 1900, MacMahon 1909, Young 1927] f λ = λ! t i=1 l i! (i,j): i<j (l i l j ).

Product and Determinantal Formulas For a partition λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ), let l i := λ i + t i (1 i t). Theorem: [Frobenius 1900, MacMahon 1909, Young 1927] f λ = λ! t i=1 l i! Theorem (Determinantal Formula) (i,j): i<j (l i l j ). [ f λ 1 = λ! det (λ i i + j)! ] t, i,j=1 using the convention 1/k! := 0 for negative integers k.

Hook Length Formula The hook length of a cell c = (i, j) in a diagram of shape λ is h c := λ i + λ j i j + 1.

Hook Length Formula The hook length of a cell c = (i, j) in a diagram of shape λ is h c := λ i + λ j i j + 1. hook of c = (1, 2) 6 4 3 1 4 2 1 1 hook lengths

Hook Length Formula The hook length of a cell c = (i, j) in a diagram of shape λ is h c := λ i + λ j i j + 1. hook of c = (1, 2) 6 4 3 1 4 2 1 1 hook lengths Theorem: [Frame-Robinson-Thrall, 1954] f λ = λ! c [λ] h. c

Still Classical

Skew Shapes If λ and µ are partitions such that [µ] [λ], namely µ i λ i ( i), then the skew diagram of shape λ/µ is the set difference [λ/µ] := [λ] \ [µ] of the two ordinary shapes. = [(6, 4, 3, 1)/(4, 2, 1)] 2 5 6 3 7 1 4 SYT((6, 4, 3, 1)/(4, 2, 1)).

Skew Shapes and Representations

Skew Shapes and Representations λ/µ χ λ/µ skew shape of size n (reducible) character of S n

Skew Shapes and Representations λ/µ χ λ/µ skew shape of size n (reducible) character of S n SYT(λ/µ) basis of representation space

Skew Shapes and Representations λ/µ χ λ/µ skew shape of size n (reducible) character of S n SYT(λ/µ) basis of representation space f λ/µ = χ λ/µ (id)

Skew Shapes and Representations λ/µ χ λ/µ skew shape of size n (reducible) character of S n SYT(λ/µ) basis of representation space f λ/µ = χ λ/µ (id) For example, the regular character χ reg (g) = G δ g,id (G = S 4 )

Skew Determinantal Formula Let λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ) and µ = (µ 1,..., µ s ) be partitions such that µ i λ i ( i). Theorem [Aitken 1943, Feit 1953] [ f λ/µ 1 = λ/µ! det (λ i µ j i + j)! ] t, i,j=1 with the conventions µ j := 0 for j > s and 1/k! := 0 for negative integers k. Unfortunately, no product or hook length formula is known for general skew shapes.

Shifted Shapes A partition λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ) is strict if the part sizes λ i are strictly decreasing: λ 1 >... > λ t > 0.

Shifted Shapes A partition λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ) is strict if the part sizes λ i are strictly decreasing: λ 1 >... > λ t > 0. The shifted diagram of shape λ is the set D = [λ ] := {(i, j) 1 i t, i j λ i + i 1}. Note that (λ i + i 1) t i=1 are weakly decreasing.

Shifted Shapes A partition λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ) is strict if the part sizes λ i are strictly decreasing: λ 1 >... > λ t > 0. The shifted diagram of shape λ is the set D = [λ ] := {(i, j) 1 i t, i j λ i + i 1}. Note that (λ i + i 1) t i=1 are weakly decreasing. λ = (4, 3, 1) = [λ ] =

Shifted Shapes A partition λ = (λ 1,..., λ t ) is strict if the part sizes λ i are strictly decreasing: λ 1 >... > λ t > 0. The shifted diagram of shape λ is the set D = [λ ] := {(i, j) 1 i t, i j λ i + i 1}. Note that (λ i + i 1) t i=1 are weakly decreasing. λ = (4, 3, 1) = [λ ] = T = 1 2 4 6 3 5 8 7 SYT((4, 3, 1) ).

Shifted Shapes and Representations

Shifted Shapes and Representations Strict partitions λ of n essentially correspond to irreducible projective characters of S n.

Shifted Shapes and Representations Strict partitions λ of n essentially correspond to irreducible projective characters of S n. g λ := # SYT(λ ) Corollary: 2 n t (g λ ) 2 = n! λ =n

Shifted Formulas Like ordinary shapes, the number g λ of SYT of shifted shape λ has three types of formulas product, hook length and determinantal. Theorem [Schur 1911, Thrall 1952] Theorem Theorem g λ = g λ = λ! t i=1 λ i! g λ = (i,j): i<j λ! c [λ ] h c λ i λ j λ i + λ j [ λ! (i,j): i<j (λ i + λ j ) det 1 (λ i t + j)! ] t i,j=1

Non-Classical

Truncated Shapes 1 2 4 3 5 7 6 8 9 1 2 4 3 5 7 6 8 9

Truncated Shapes 1 2 4 3 5 7 6 8 9 classical 1 2 4 3 5 7 6 8 9 non-classical

Truncated Shapes 1 2 4 3 5 7 6 8 9 classical skew 1 2 4 3 5 7 6 8 9 non-classical shifted, truncated

Truncated Shapes 1 2 4 3 5 7 6 8 9 classical skew 1 2 4 3 5 7 6 8 9 non-classical shifted, truncated # SYT = 768 # SYT = 4

Truncated Shifted Staircase The number of SYT whose shape is a shifted staircase with a truncated corner came up in a combinatorial setting, counting the number of shortest paths between antipodes in a certain graph of triangulations.

Truncated Shifted Staircase The number of SYT whose shape is a shifted staircase with a truncated corner came up in a combinatorial setting, counting the number of shortest paths between antipodes in a certain graph of triangulations. Computations show that # SYT is unusually smooth.

Truncated Shifted Staircase The number of SYT whose shape is a shifted staircase with a truncated corner came up in a combinatorial setting, counting the number of shortest paths between antipodes in a certain graph of triangulations. Computations show that # SYT is unusually smooth. λ = (9, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1) N = 54 (size)

Truncated Shifted Staircase The number of SYT whose shape is a shifted staircase with a truncated corner came up in a combinatorial setting, counting the number of shortest paths between antipodes in a certain graph of triangulations. Computations show that # SYT is unusually smooth. λ = (9, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1) N = 54 (size) g λ = 116528733315142075200 = 2 6 3 5 2 7 13 2 17 2 19 23 37 41 43 47 53 The largest prime factor is < N!!!

Shifted Staircase Let δ n := (n, n 1,..., 1), a strict partition (shifted staircase shape).

Shifted Staircase Let δ n := (n, n 1,..., 1), a strict partition (shifted staircase shape). Corollary: (of Schur s product formula for shifted shapes) The number of SYT of shifted staircase shape δ n is where N := δ n = ( ) n+1 2. n 1 i! g δn = N! (2i + 1)!, i=0

Truncated Shifted Staircase The following enumeration problem was actually the original motivation for the study of truncated shapes, because of its combinatorial interpretation.

Truncated Shifted Staircase The following enumeration problem was actually the original motivation for the study of truncated shapes, because of its combinatorial interpretation. Theorem: [A-King-Roichman, Panova] The number of SYT of truncated shifted staircase shape δ n \ (1) is equal to g δn C nc n 2 2 C 2n 3, where C n = 1 n+1( 2n n ) is the n-th Catalan number.

Truncated Shifted Staircase More generally, truncating a square from a shifted staircase shape: [δ 5 \ (2 2 )] = Theorem: [AKR] The number of SYT of truncated shifted staircase shape δ m+2k \ ((k 1) k 1 ) is g (m+k+1,...,m+3,m+1,...,1) g (m+k+1,...,m+3,m+1) N!M! (N M 1)!(2M + 1)!, where N = ( ) m+2k+1 2 (k 1) 2 is the size of the shape and M = k(2m + k + 3)/2 1. Similarly for truncating almost squares (k k 1, k 1).

Rectangle [(5 4 )] = Observation: The number of SYT of rectangular shape (n m ) is f (nm) = (mn)! FmF n F m+n, where F m := m 1 i=0 i!.

Truncated Rectangle Truncate a square from the NE corner of a rectangle: [(5 4 ) \ (2 2 )] = Theorem: [AKR] The number of SYT of truncated rectangular shape ((n + k 1) m+k 1 ) \ ((k 1) k 1 ) (and size N) is N!(mk 1)!(nk 1)!(m + n 1)!k (mk + nk 1)! Fm 1F n 1 F k 1 F m+n+k 1. Similar results were obtained for truncation by almost squares.

Truncated Rectangle Not much is known for truncation of rectangles by rectangles. The following formula was conjectured by AKR and proved by Sun. Theorem: [Sun] For n 2 f (nn )\(2) = (n2 2)!(3n 4)! 2 6 (6n 8)!(2n 2)!(n 2)! 2 F 2 n 2 F 2n 4. Theorem: [Snow] For n 2 and k 0 f (nk+1 )\(n 2) = (kn k)!(kn + n)! (kn + n k)! FkF n F n+k.

Truncated Rectangle Truncate a rectangle by a (shifted) staircase. [(4 5 ) \ δ 2 ] = Theorem: [Panova] Let m n k be positive integers. The number of SYT of truncated shape (n m ) \ δ k is ( ) N f (n k 1)m (m,m 1,...,m k) E(k + 1, m, n k 1) g, m(n k 1) E(k + 1, m, 0) where N = mn ( ) k+1 2 is the size of the shape and E(r, p, s) =....

Shifted Strip

Shifted Strip Theorem: [Sun] The number of SYT of truncated shifted shape with n rows and 4 cells in each row is the (2n 1)-st Pell number 1 2 2 ( (1 + 2) 2n 1 (1 2) 2n 1).

Open Problems Which non-classical shapes have nice/product formulas? A modified hook length formula? A representation theoretical interpretation?

Grazie per l attenzione!