APPENDIX C BIODIVERSITY OFFSET STRATEGY

Similar documents
15 March 2010 Re: Draft Native Vegetation of the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority Area GIS layers and explanatory reports

LEARD FOREST REGIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY STAGE 1 SCOPING REPORT FINAL

Natural Resource Management. Northern Tasmania. Strategy. Appendix 2

Biodiversity Blueprint Overview

Council Roadside Reserves Environmental Grants

REGIS RESOURCES LTD. McPhillamys Update Presentation May 2018

HCSA Peer Review Report Korindo - PT. Tunas Sawaerma (POP A) (PT. TSE)

SIF_7.1_v2. Indicator. Measurement. What should the measurement tell us?

Local Area Key Issues Paper No. 13: Southern Hinterland townships growth opportunities

Comparing losses and gains in biodiversity: Lessons learnt from HS2 Phase One

Bushfire Risk Management and how it affects Revegetation Design

ACTON COMMUNITY WIDE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY. Town of Acton and PAL, Inc.

Appendix 2b. NRCS Soil Survey

Conserving freshwater ecosystem values in Tasmania, Australia: identification and application of freshwater conservation management priority areas

Appendix 15a Aboriginal Heritage Inquiry System Search Results

Spatial Graph Theory for Cross-scale Connectivity Analysis

Australian tropical savanna Information sheet

Independent Environmental Audit Erosion and Sediment Control

Investigating the Grassland Ecosystem Student Notes

POPULATION TRENDS FOR TULARE PSEUDOBAHIA AND STRIPED ADOBE LILY

KUSILE 60 YEAR ASH DUMP FACILITY WETLAND OFFSET STRATEGY

Spatial Decision-Support for National Marine Conservation Areas in the Southern Strait of Georgia and Gwaii Haanas

PEST MONITORING Describe GIS, and design and report possum population monitoring programmes using GIS

Environmental Statement South Kyle Wind Farm August Appendix 12.9: The Habitat Loss and Disturbance Calculations

Local Biodiversity Program

Southwest LRT Habitat Analysis. May 2016 Southwest LRT Project Technical Report

Factors That Shape Places. Sackville North

A national islands database and assessment of conservation value

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

Changes in Texas Ecoregions

Orica Australia Pty Ltd Ammonium Nitrate Facility Upgrade

Assessing the ecological impacts of salinity management using a Bayesian Decision Network

How much is the environment worth? Catchment management decisions in the Hawkesbury-Nepean

Most people used to live like this

VCS MODULE VMD0018 METHODS TO DETERMINE STRATIFICATION

Factors That Shape Places Sackville North

Appendix K.2: Sediment Management Excerpt from South Orange County Hydromodification Management Plan

BURACOPPIN EXPLORATION UPDATE

Looking at the big picture to plan land treatments

1 Summary Monetary Component Public Purpose Land Provision Introduction Document Structure...

An Introduction to Day Two. Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning Lakewood, Colorado August 15-16, 16, 2006

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

RANGE AND ANIMAL SCIENCES AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT - Vol. II - Catchment Management A Framework for Managing Rangelands - Hugh Milner

Atlas of Living Scotland New data infrastructure for research and citizen science

For personal use only

GIS to Support West Nile Virus Program

Consulting Services (Pty.) Ltd.

The Soils and Land Capability for Agriculture. Land North of Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire

EcoServ-GIS. EcoServ GIS Stage I. Why EcoServ GIS? 17/12/2012

Krešimir Žganec, doc. dr. sc. University of Zadar

Natural Vegetation and Wildlife

Savannah District s Revised SOP: Moving Towards A Functional Approach. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

± Portion_82_of_216. Knysna_Vegetation. Vegetation Type, Ecosystem Status

HCSA Peer Review Report Musim Mas PT. Mentari Pratama (PT. MP)

ASX RELEASE ACTIVITY UPDATE SPARGOVILLE PROJECT WA MINING AND EXPLORATION

Priority areas for grizzly bear conservation in western North America: an analysis of habitat and population viability INTRODUCTION METHODS

Resilient Landscapes Fund

A Small Migrating Herd. Mapping Wildlife Distribution 1. Mapping Wildlife Distribution 2. Conservation & Reserve Management

GIS AND REMOTE SENSING FOR OPEN SPACE PROTECTION ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT

Appendix E: Wetland Verification Exercise

Jl. ZA.PagarAlam No. 26, LabuhanRatu, Bandar Lampung 35142, Lampung, Indonesia

Faculty of Biosciences Department of Plant Sciences Master in Plant Sciences

NSW MINING Health, Safety, Environment & Community

Exploring Victoria s Biodiversity

For personal use only

Conserving Brownfield Biodiversity. Jamie Roberts Biodiversity Projects Manager

For personal use only

Seas of Bees: Astonishing Native Bee Richness at Pinnacles National Monument

For personal use only

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT Date: 03 October 2018 Number: 604/031018

A P P E N D I X I A P P E N D I X GEODIVERSITY REVIEW

GEOPACIFIC REPORTS HIGH GOLD VALUES IN AUGER SOIL SAMPLES FROM THE QALAU AND TATAIYA PROSPECTS, RAKI RAKI PROJECT,

EXPLORATION UPDATE: BODDINGTON SOUTH GOLD PROJECT AND DOOLGUNNA STATION PROJECT

Cripps Ranch 76+/- Acres Orchard Development Opportunity Dixon, CA. Presented By:

New Gold Anomalies Outlined at Yako, Burkina Faso

Mapping and Modeling for Regional Planning

First application of Habitat Evaluation Procedure to EIA in Japan: How to quantify loss and gain of habitats?

DESKTOP PALAEONTOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Bloemhof Extensions 11, 12 and 13 Township development in Lekwa-Teemane Local Municipality

Name Block Date. The Quadrat Study: An Introduction

NOSE HILL PARK LINEAR BIRD TRANSECTS 2006

Appendix D ORV Assessment for Clarion River

Planning for coastal hazards in a changing climate

For personal use only

Getting Biodiversity Data

Biophysical Interactions

An Introduction to NatureServe Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning Phoenix, Arizona November 8 & 9, 2006

Draft Urban Hamilton Official Plan. Amendment No. XX

Privately Protected Areas in Australia: Progress and Prospects

Data Dictionary for Network of Conservation Areas Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Can a model transferability framework improve ecosystem service estimates? A case study of soil carbon sequestration in Tillamook Bay, OR, USA

Creating an e-flora for South Africa

For personal use only

ACRONYMS AREAS COUNTRIES MARINE TERMS

FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE, DEHRADUN

Document Control. Revision No. Date issued Authors Reviewed by Date Reviewed Revision type. 1 25/07/2012 T. Brown A. Sinel 25/07/2012 Draft

An Update on Land Use & Land Cover Mapping in Ireland

CHEMISTRY, BS. Degree Requirements. Admissions. Policies. Requirements. Admissions & Policies. Teacher Licensure. BS without Concentration

Visit us at...

Landscape Planning and Habitat Metrics

EPA public register: Licensee: HV Operations Pty Ltd PO Box 315, Singleton NSW 2330

Transcription:

APPENDIX C BIODIVERSITY OFFSET STRATEGY Submissions Report 17 076 Final v1 C I

Submissions Report C.1 INTRODUCTION This Biodiversity Offset Strategy (BOS) outlines a broad approach for meeting the offset requirements for the proposal in accordance with the NSW Framework for Biodiversity Assessment (FBA); the appropriate pathway for assessing biodiversity impacts for this project. The offset requirements for the proposal have been determined according to the FBA through the preparation of a Biodiversity Assessment Report (BAR) (NGH Environmental 2017b). These requirements are summarised in Section C.2 below. Under Section 11.2 of the FBA, ecosystem and species credit requirements identified for the project can be offset in a number of ways, including: a) Retirement of biodiversity credits from the biodiversity register established under Part 7A of the TSC Act (which would include retiring credits via a BioBanking agreement) b) Ecological rehabilitation of previously mined land in accordance with Section 12.2 of the FBA c) Supplementary measures as determined in accordance with the NSW Biodiversity Offsets Policy for Major Projects (if appropriate offsets are not feasible, proponents can provide funds equivalent to those required to purchase biodiversity credits) d) A combination of the above. Based on changes made to the project footprint (described in Section 3 of the Submission Report) the updated credit requirement is provided in Section C.2 below and the proposed strategy for meeting this requirement is detailed in Section C.3. C.2 UPDATED CREDIT REQUIREMENT C.2.1 Refinement of the indicative layout Two vegetation communities occur onsite. Both belong to the White Box Yellow Box Blakely s Red Gum Woodland Endangered Ecological Community (EEC). One patch meets the Commonwealth Environment Protection Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) criteria for a listed Critically Endangered Ecological Community (CEEC). The indicative layout has been updated specifically to reduce impacts on significant vegetation, identified as high constraints. In response to OEH submission, this includes the area in the centre of the site that would meet the CEEC definition. The comparison of the native vegetation impacts presented in the EIS (and BAR) to the refined layout is provided in Table C 1. In summary: No CEEC would now be impacted (a reduction of approximately 2 ha). 8.48 ha less native vegetation in moderate to good and 1.35 ha in low condition would now be impacted. 17 076 Final v1 C II

Submissions Report Table C 1 Comparison of the native vegetation impacts presented in the EIS and those now proposed PCT 266 White Box Grassy Woodland and derived native grassland Total: Impacted area from EIS (ha) 8.57 (moderate to good condition) 135.34 (low condition) Revised impact area now proposed (ha) 0.09 (moderate to good condition) 134.04 (low condition) Net (ha) 8.48 (moderate to good condition) 1.3 (low condition) Amount that qualifies as CEEC: 2.08 0.00 2.08 267 Blakely's Red Gum Yellow Box grassy tall woodland Total: 0.32 (low condition) 0.27 (low condition) 0.05 (low condition) Amount that qualifies as CEEC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 C.2.2 Requirement to offset Clearing of EEC (and CEEC) or threatened species habitat with site value scores equal to or greater than 17 generates an offset requirement for the project. No threatened species credits for species credit species are generated. The proposed layout has been redesigned to avoid all impacts to zones generating offsets where possible. The has resulted in small residual areas that are mostly due to cable routes where impacts to native dominated areas cannot be avoided. The comparison of the native vegetation zones that generated offsets in the EIS (and BAR) to the refined layout is provided in Table C 2. Table C 2 Comparison of the zones generating offsets presented in the EIS and those now proposed Zone ID Vegetation zones Condition class Impacted area from EIS (ha) 2. PCT #266 BVT CW216 White Box Grassy Woodland in the Upper Slopes sub region of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion 4. PCT #266 BVT CW216 White Box Grassy Woodland in the Upper Slopes sub region of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion 5. PCT #266 BVT CW216 White Box Grassy Woodland in the Upper Slopes sub region of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion Moderate/Good Other (Planted Vegetation) Moderate good Derived Grassland Moderate to Good Revised impact area now proposed (ha) Net (ha) 0.90 0.00 0.90 1.81 0.06 1.75 5.86 0.03 5.83 17 076 Final v1 C III

Submissions Report Zone ID Vegetation zones Condition class Impacted area from EIS (ha) Revised impact area now proposed (ha) Net (ha) Total 8.57 0.09 8.48 C.2.3 Updated FBA credit calculations The BAR determined that a total of 203 ecosystem credits were required to be offset for the development (BioBanking Credit Calculator (BCC) Major Project 144/2017/4350MP Version 2). The BCC full credit report for the development site was provided as Appendix E of the BAR (NGH Environmental 2017b). The impact areas were updated consistent with Table C 2 above. No other changes were warranted to the calculations. The updated offset requirement is 3 ecosystem credits, a reduction of credits, as detailed in Table C 3. The credit report produced by the BCC is provided below in Section C.4. Table C 3 Updated credit requirement Zone ID Vegetation zones Condition class Credits required in BDAR 2. PCT #266 BVT CW216 White Box Grassy Woodland in the Upper Slopes sub region of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion 4. PCT #266 BVT CW216 White Box Grassy Woodland in the Upper Slopes sub region of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion 5. PCT #266 BVT CW216 White Box Grassy Woodland in the Upper Slopes sub region of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion Moderate/Good Other (Planted Vegetation) Moderate good Derived Grassland Moderate to Good Revised credit requirement now proposed Net 26 0 26 56 2 54 121 1 120 Total 203 3 200 C.3 STRATEGY TO RETIRE CREDITS Considering the options set out in Section C.1, Option a) Retiring credits via a BioBanking agreement established within the solar farm site, would have been the preferred approach to retire the required credits. However, given the very low credit requirement of the revised project design (3 ecosystem credits), the establishment of physical offsets to meet this requirement is not considered practical. The small size of an offset site generating 3 would be fragmented, subject to edge effects and unlikely to improve in biodiversity value. As such, retirement of the 3 biodiversity credits from the biodiversity register 17 076 Final v1 C IV

Submissions Report established under Part 7A of the TSC Act is preferred. No onsite offsets or enhancement of existing vegetation is proposed. When the NSW biodiversity offsets policy for major projects was developed, it was recognised that it should be supported by an offsets fund. The fund would allow proponents to meet their offset requirement through a payment into the fund, if they choose. The fund would then buy the required offsets instead of the proponent. This increases certainty for proponents and allows a more strategic approach to finding and buying offsets. Payment into the fund would be considered a supplementary measure under Section 11.2 of the FBA. This fund has now been established under the NSW Biodiversity Offsets Scheme as detailed by the NSW Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (BC Act), as the Biodiversity Conservation Trust Fund (BCTF). If credits are not able to be retired through purchasing them from the biodiversity register (or equivalent under the new legislation), then the preferred approach would be to make a payment into the BCTF. The amount to be paid into the BCTF would be calculated using the NSW OEH Offsets Payment Calculator with a conversion factor applied on the FBA credit requirement (to convert to the equivalent credit number under the new scheme to be determined in consultation with OEH). Note: No Rehabilitation on land identified for rehabilitation or supplementary measures as defined in the NSW Biodiversity Offsets Policy for Major Projects are proposed as part of this BOS. C.4 CONCLUSION The proposed layout has been redesigned to avoid all impacts to zones generating offsets, where possible. The has resulted in small residual areas that are mostly due to cable routes where impacts to native dominated areas cannot be avoided. In summary: No CEEC would now be impacted (a reduction of approximately 2 ha). 8.48 ha less native vegetation in moderate to good and 1.35 ha in low condition would now be impacted. A credit requirement of 3 biodiversity credits is generated by the proposal. Retirement of the 3 biodiversity credits from the biodiversity register established under Part 7A of the TSC Act is preferred. No onsite offsets or enhancement of existing vegetation is proposed. 17 076 Final v1 C V

Submissions Report C.5 BIOBANKING CREDIT CALCULATOR CREDIT REPORT FOR THE REVISED LAYOUT 17 076 Final v1 C VI

Biodiversity credit report This report identifies the number and type of biodiversity credits required for a major project. Date of report: 8/03/2018 Time: 5:03:41PM Calculator version: v4.0 Major Project details Proposal ID: Proposal name: 144/2017/4350MP Proposal address: Goolma Road Wellington NSW 2820 Proponent name: First Solar (Australia) Pty Ltd Proponent address: Level 3 16 Spring Street Sydney NSW 2000 Proponent phone: 02 9002 7710 Assessor name: Dave Maynard Assessor address: PO Box 470 Bega NSW 2550 Assessor phone: (02) 64928311 Assessor accreditation: 144

Summary of ecosystem credits required Plant Community type Area (ha) Credits created Blakely's Red Gum - Yellow Box grassy tall woodland of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion 0.27 0.00 White Box grassy woodland in the upper slopes sub-region of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion 134.13 3.00 Total 134.40 3 Credit profiles

1. Blakely's Red Gum - Yellow Box grassy tall woodland of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW112) Number of ecosystem credits created IBRA sub-region 0 Upper Slopes - Central West Offset options - Plant Community types Offset options - IBRA sub-regions Blakely's Red Gum - Yellow Box grassy tall woodland of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW112) Fuzzy Box Woodland on alluvial brown loam soils mainly in the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW138) Upper Slopes - Central West and any IBRA subregion that adjoins the IBRA subregion in which the development occurs White Box grassy woodland of the Nandewar Bioregion and Brigalow Belt South Bioregion, (CW215) White Box grassy woodland in the upper slopes sub-region of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW216) Red Box - White Box +/- Red Stringybark hill woodland in the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW280)

2. White Box grassy woodland in the upper slopes sub-region of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW216) Number of ecosystem credits created IBRA sub-region 0 Upper Slopes - Central West Offset options - Plant Community types Offset options - IBRA sub-regions White Box grassy woodland in the upper slopes sub-region of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW216) Blakely's Red Gum - Yellow Box grassy tall woodland of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW112) Upper Slopes - Central West and any IBRA subregion that adjoins the IBRA subregion in which the development occurs Fuzzy Box Woodland on alluvial brown loam soils mainly in the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW138) White Box grassy woodland of the Nandewar Bioregion and Brigalow Belt South Bioregion, (CW215) Red Box - White Box +/- Red Stringybark hill woodland in the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW280)

3. White Box grassy woodland in the upper slopes sub-region of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW216) Number of ecosystem credits created IBRA sub-region 3 Upper Slopes - Central West Offset options - Plant Community types Offset options - IBRA sub-regions White Box grassy woodland in the upper slopes sub-region of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW216) Blakely's Red Gum - Yellow Box grassy tall woodland of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW112) Upper Slopes - Central West and any IBRA subregion that adjoins the IBRA subregion in which the development occurs Fuzzy Box Woodland on alluvial brown loam soils mainly in the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW138) White Box grassy woodland of the Nandewar Bioregion and Brigalow Belt South Bioregion, (CW215) Red Box - White Box +/- Red Stringybark hill woodland in the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion, (CW280)

Summary of species credits required

BioBanking Credit Calculator Ecosystem credits Proposal ID : Proposal name : Assessor name : Assessor accreditation number : Tool version : Report created : 144/2017/4350MP Dave Maynard 144 v4.0 08/03/2018 17:01 Assessment Landsc Vegetation Vegetation type name Condition Red Management Manage Current Future Loss in Credit Credit TS with highest credit requirement Average Species TG Final credit circle name ape zone name flag zone name ment site site site required required species loss Value requirement for score status zone value value value for bio for TS management area diversity zone Circle 1 12.80 CW112_Lo Blakely's Red Gum - Yellow Box grassy tall woodland of the Low No 1 0.27 14.00 0.00 14.00 4 0 0.00 0.00 0 w NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion Circle 1 12.80 CW216_Lo White Box grassy woodland in the upper slopes sub-region Low No 3 1.98 8.67 0.00 8.67 19 0 0.00 0.00 0 w of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion Circle 1 12.80 CW216_Mo derate/goo d White Box grassy woodland in the upper slopes sub-region of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion Moderate/Goo d Yes 4 0.06 36.67 0.00 36.67 2 2 Speckled Warbler 33.33 2.60 2 Circle 1 12.80 CW216_Mo White Box grassy woodland in the upper slopes sub-region Moderate/Goo No 5 0.03 26.00 0.00 26.00 1 1 Speckled Warbler 38.89 2.60 1 derate/goo of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion d_derived d_derived grassland grassland Circle 1 12.80 CW216_Mo derate/goo d_poor White Box grassy woodland in the upper slopes sub-region of the NSW South Western Slopes Bioregion Moderate/Goo d_poor No 6 132.06 10.67 0.00 10.67 0 1,479 Masked Owl 33.33 3.00 0 As on 8/03/2018 Page 1 of 2

BioBanking Credit Calculator Species credits Proposal ID : Proposal name : Assessor name : Assessor accreditation number : Tool version : v4.0 Report created : 08/03/2018 17:01 Scientific name Common name Species TG value Identified population? Can Id. popn. be offset? Area / number of loss Negligible loss Red flag status Number of credits No As on 8/03/2018 Page 2 of 2